364:
multiple ring names, including her real name in
Shimmer. I don't know if moving the article midway through a GA review is wise, though. (2) I added dates to the "Debut" section. I agree that following the career of an independent wrestler can be confusing, as some (like stock) wrestle for several promotions in quick succession just to get some ring time. (3) It's hard to find information from good sources. Wrestling rumor sites talk about her, but they're not particularly reliable. I expanded the discussion of Stock's career with Shimmer, though.
341:
272:
248:
221:
211:
186:
172:
158:
118:
104:
317:
303:
48:
at the same time, comments about one of the articles can be left on the review page for the other, if you so desire, to save time flitting between the articles. Whilst reviewing articles is a speciality of mine, wrestling is not, and so I may appreciate some help with terms, and the like. Good luck!
363:
Thank you for the review. In response to your comments: (1) I agree that the statement about Stock returning to her real name is proven false by the sources. I removed the sentence. As for the article name, your comment made me realize that the article should probably be moved. She competes under
40:, I will be your reviewer for the forseeable future. Due to the lengthy wait before this review, I shall attempt to complete this review as quick as possible, although of course I will never sacrifice quality. Due to the fact that I will be revewing
382:
You have addressed my concerns. I'm now ready to list this as a GA, but I will let you move the article first. As such, I'll do all of the "paperwork" in adding it to the GA page, etc a bit later after the article is moved. Regards,
127:
It is hard to get a handle on the time frame of Stock's time spent in various promotions (debut). The entire section seems to encompass only about a year and a half, but with only two date mentions, I kinda get lost. Can this be
123:
The article seems to suggest that Stock only wrestled under the name "Dark Angel" for a brief time, though the citations suggest it has been in use longer. Given the article is titled "Dark Angel", this seems incongruous to
53:
Note: It has been five days since the above was posted and the reviewer hasn't edited on
Knowledge (XXG) since then, so I am removing the "under review" tag at WP:GAN in the hope of finding a reviewer.
82:
76:
131:
There also does not appear to be much after 2006. Is there more information available on what Stock has been up to in the past two years?
295:
178:
346:
Decent article overall, especially compared to what it was when AfDed. I'd say a few minor clarifications and this is a GA.
110:
144:
404:
372:
59:
45:
41:
367:
Please look these changes over when you have a chance and let me know what you think. Thanks again,
400:
368:
55:
285:
387:
350:
234:
37:
17:
309:
164:
384:
347:
396:
408:
390:
376:
353:
63:
322:Images would be nice, but not necessary for GA
8:
294:(images are tagged and non-free images have
7:
316:
302:
289:, where possible and appropriate.
24:
339:
315:
301:
270:
246:
243:Fair representation without bias
219:
209:
184:
170:
156:
116:
102:
395:Thanks. The article is now at
1:
340:
271:
247:
220:
210:
185:
171:
157:
117:
103:
409:02:43, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
391:02:28, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
377:01:54, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
354:00:15, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
427:
64:15:31, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
92:reasonably well written
308:(appropriate use with
283:It is illustrated by
235:neutral point of view
199:broad in its coverage
46:Juggernaut (wrestler)
42:Dark Angel (wrestler)
296:fair use rationales
140:factually accurate
36:Hello. My name is
310:suitable captions
267:No edit wars etc.
418:
343:
342:
319:
318:
305:
304:
274:
273:
250:
249:
223:
222:
213:
212:
188:
187:
174:
173:
165:reliable sources
160:
159:
120:
119:
106:
105:
18:Talk:Sarah Stock
426:
425:
421:
420:
419:
417:
416:
415:
232:It follows the
206:(major aspects)
72:
34:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
424:
422:
414:
413:
412:
411:
401:GaryColemanFan
369:GaryColemanFan
361:
360:
359:
358:
357:
356:
327:
326:
325:
324:
323:
281:
280:
279:
278:
277:
257:
256:
255:
254:
253:
230:
229:
228:
227:
226:
195:
194:
193:
192:
191:
163:(citations to
136:
135:
134:
133:
132:
130:
129:
126:
125:
87:
86:
71:
68:
67:
66:
56:GaryColemanFan
33:
30:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
423:
410:
406:
402:
398:
394:
393:
392:
389:
386:
381:
380:
379:
378:
374:
370:
365:
355:
352:
349:
345:
344:
337:
334:
333:
331:
328:
321:
320:
313:
311:
299:
297:
291:
290:
288:
287:
282:
276:
275:
268:
265:
264:
262:
258:
252:
251:
244:
241:
240:
238:
236:
231:
225:
224:
217:
207:
203:
202:
200:
196:
190:
189:
182:
180:
168:
166:
154:
150:
149:
147:
146:
141:
137:
122:
121:
114:
112:
100:
96:
95:
93:
89:
88:
85:for criteria)
84:
80:
78:
74:
73:
69:
65:
61:
57:
52:
51:
50:
47:
43:
39:
31:
26:
19:
366:
362:
335:
329:
307:
293:
284:
266:
260:
242:
233:
215:
205:
198:
176:
162:
153:(references)
152:
143:
139:
108:
98:
91:
75:
35:
397:Sarah Stock
38:weebiloobil
145:verifiable
128:addressed?
336:Pass/Fail
216:(focused)
27:GA Review
70:Take two
330:Overall
99:(prose)
286:images
261:stable
259:It is
237:policy
197:It is
138:It is
90:It is
79:review
81:(see
32:Intro
16:<
405:talk
388:lute
385:Reso
373:talk
351:lute
348:Reso
142:and
83:here
60:talk
44:and
124:me.
111:MoS
407:)
399:.
375:)
338::
332::
314::
306:b
300::
292:a
269::
263:.
245::
239:.
218::
214:b
208::
204:a
201:.
183::
179:OR
175:c
169::
161:b
155::
151:a
148:.
115::
107:b
101::
97:a
94:.
77:GA
62:)
403:(
371:(
312:)
298:)
181:)
177:(
167:)
113:)
109:(
58:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.