2007:. You may find that few, if any clinical professionals consider the ICD when making any decisions or writing about health conditions. It is used almost entirely for purposes of epidemiology and business. We laugh about it in the clinic probably on a weekly basis, basically every time we need to hunt down a code for billing purposes, because the options are so overlapping and contradictory and absurd. So I wouldn't personally say it has much, if anything, to do with the medical or clinical definitions of "disease." There's an ICD code for "Accidental striking against or bumped into by another person, sequela" (W51.XXXA) and "Activities involved arts and handcrafts" (Y93.D) and "Problems in relationship with in-laws" (Z63.1) and "Bizarre personal appearance" (R46.1) and I could go on and on. None of these are diseases.As for the sources in question, I disagree with your interpretations. I think I may have not given enough by just linking, so here are the quotes I noted in particular:
1185:. Such wording doesn't make much sense in a medical article as opposed to a social-sciences one, and in this context is more confusing than helpful. I have no objection to shifting more toward using "male" and "female" over "men" and "women", especially given that many M or F conditions also affect boys and girls, respectively. But it is clear that the medical literature routinely uses, respectively, "women" or "men" to mean humans with female genetics and biology, or those with male. WP follows the sources and does not engage in language-change advocacy.
158:
1981:
that its inclusion in this list means that the terms used are mutually exclusive whereas they also could've simply chosen to include overlapping or synonymous terms for the purpose of clarification. A more appropriate interpretation of the evidence we have presented would be that there are no real definitions of these terms, and that generally people understand that the use of "conditions and diseases" or often even just "diseases" can cover everything. (also pinging
2145:(948 hits) and you'll easily find sentences like: "...tics, and Tourette's syndrome (TS) display sex differences in disease susceptibility...", "First, there are those diseases, such as WiskottAldrich syndrome....", "Sex differences in Sjögren’s syndrome:..SS is diminished secretory production from the primary exocrine gland and the lacrimal or salivary glands resulting in symptoms of dry eye and mouth. The disease is believed...", ~1/10th number of hits with
142:
1963:- while syndrome has a stable definition, disease and disorder don't (and the stable definition of syndrome gets ignored by everyone anyway, in favour of established naming). For your citations, the first that you gave for disorder is a symposium. It also explicitly notes that disease doesn't have a clear definition (as does the second). Both are attempts to establish a definition. With your examples, you have also ignored the literal standard - the
533:
512:
605:
2163:"Sex differences in a disease or trait can provide insight into its causes, risk factors, and consequences. The aims of this paper are to: (a) summarize the sex-specific lifetime prevalence of the most common psychiatric disorders among adults and youth; (b) enumerate hypotheses for sex differences in mental disorders; (c) describe the use of the concepts and tools of genetic epidemiology to evaluate..."
655:
428:
407:
438:
234:
2220:(and even in those 9 hits, the phrasing at the top is: "...sex differences in health and a wide range of diseases". Diseases that have an age association will give you more hits with "sex differences in health" since "health and aging" often come together. That might be a fine article, but it isn't this one. Hard to assess the entire query, but hits I get from the things like
265:
317:
296:
327:
1904:" so as to lessen the pathologizing nature of our labels. Many users would agree that many flavors of Autism, Downs, and Klinefelter's are non-pathological and largely benign. Describing these as "diseases" is reductionist and pathologizing, and, truthfully, inaccurate as these are "syndromes" in the technical sense
659:
2311:
I'm not saying that is what the article is, but what I believe it should be. In any case, there are health conditions other than diseases that do not fit the "disease" category that differ either in existence, presentation, or frequency between both sexes and thus renaming to disease would mean there
2215:
has a paltry 3 hits. This page is currently a list of diseases ("disease" or "illness" begins each section) and their relative prevalence between sexes (and the underlying causes). It would be odd to discuss a long list of diseases in with an article titled "health". Risk, diagnosis and treatment are
2058:
Strictly speaking, the terms 'diagnosis' and 'disease' are both best avoided in psychiatric discourse unless they are completely justified. Clinical psychiatrists make few diagnoses in the sense of identifying known abnormalities which underlie the presenting symptoms. Instead, for most patients they
833:
to every point about sex differences, but keeping this makes it look like some do want that. Removing it in no way implies anything regarding any other text in the article present or future. There are much more weighty discussions going on above, and this text distracts from and confuses all of that.
2529:
article. I would strongly suggest that everyone look at the scope of the health article before making a decision. I'll also quickly list some alternatives to what has been mentioned already: merge into the health article, merge the health article into this medicine article, merge both articles under
2398:
is the way to win. In these discussions, arguments are judged on their merits, not how often they go unanswered. For many of the arguments I have encountered on this site (in all manner of places), it is better to not respond at all. Readers can view the arguments made here and decide for themselves
2348:
Hi, several editors here appear to disagree with what you believe the scope of the article is, and I would very explicitly disagree with your interpretation of MEDRS and the word "disease." Please do not continue to claim something is obvious when others disagree, it prevents a collaborative editing
2036:
Compared with disease, disorder is less restrictive: Merriam-Webster’s defines it simply as “an abnormal physical or mental condition,”2(p360) a definition with which
Dorland’s largely concurs.3(p555) The Oxford English Dictionary emphasizes that disorder involves a disturbance of function but again
832:
None of the sources are about the topic of sex differences. It is just an off-topic tangent of the sort that could be appended to any discussion of sex differences. There is no reason to shout-out different small subgroups like that here. We're obviously not going to add asides about gender identity
1999:
The ICD is not the standard for what counts as a "disease." If it were, then there would be no trauma codes in the ICD, as diseases are physiological disruptions of normal functioning by any of many definitions, trauma (e.g. getting hit by a bus) would not apply. Pregnancy would also not appear, as
1980:
do not define distinct scopes for the terms. In fact, of the organisational examples you presented, the CDC, the MO Dept of Health and
Hopkins either do not define terms or actively define them as synonymous. And the NIH Cancer Institute doesn't actually define "disease", so you are simply assuming
2702:
That is a strange question. There are many things broke on wikipedia, and have been for long periods of time; to find something that has been broke for decades isn't particularly surprising. This article is low quality: there is no real body here, lead doesn't follow the body, the terms used there
2507:
changing to "disease" version that makes the scope explicitly match what is in the article. Current title "medicine" is too general (e.g., do doctors dismiss information from female patients) and "health" becomes outright sociological. Maybe in the future somebody will write a great article on a
2616:
Actionable side issues frequently come up as a result of other ongoing talk page activity. Now that it has come up, it seems a perfectly reasonable proposal. Are you suggesting there is some problem with that, or is this just further litigation (by insinuation, which only makes it worse) of the
1851:
title would narrow the scope of the article, and, as a rule, it is generally not a good idea to pick new names that change article scope without first changing that scope. Medicine involves more than just diseases. We reassure people about benign conditions, natural variations, etc. We also treat
2381:
Hi, never said
Maneesh shouldn't raise the issue. I said he should not raise it as though it is the obvious only choice, when clearly many different views exist in this discussion. I also never said that this is a vote, I would agree with you that it is not. Both of these appear to be straw men
1805:
in the title). Using "sex differences in disease" will cover sex differences in terms of risk, diagnosis and treatment and makes it easier to cover both sex differences in diseases that both sexes can be diagnosed with as well as "sex specific" diseases that only one sex can be diagnosed with
2333:
But this is about moving this article, which I don't think you can deny is about "disease". If you think there is an article about sex differences in health, you can just create it (and presumably use the word "health" more than once). See my above comments if you are not familiar with MEDRS,
2013:
A syndrome is the most basic and is a constellation of specific signs and symptoms which commonly co-occur but that have no known etiology. A disorder is also a collection of signs and symptoms without a known cause, but it does have associated features that are assumed to play a role in its
2367:. If you disagree with Maneesh, you should respond to the issues they've raised rather than simply saying they shouldn't raise them at all. (I will note that you have responded to the issues raised in this comment, just that the points in Maneesh's other comments haven't been.) --
1111:
I'm confused. If it already says the diseases occur in the female reproductive system, is any further description necessary? Isn't it understood that only people with female reproductive systems can have those diseases? Female, women, or any other term would be redundant if so.
2124:. It needlessly narrows the scope of the article, which already contains examples of conditions that are explicitly not diseases. If we are to keep those examples, either we would be pathologising those conditions or we would have to remove content due to the narrower scope.
1635:
is important opens with discussion on sex differences (and should link back here). The disparities between women's health and men's health is why prominent agencies that have led work in sex differences (which the article does not reflect) in medicine are tied to women, see
2530:
a different name, delete this article, or turn this article into a list. I don't overly care what's decided and I'm not necessarily arguing that any of these are good ideas, but this discussion has gotten overly fixated on terms rather than considering alternatives. --
871:
Why not just say women (and trans men) as a much shorter compromise. And perhaps most importantly, what is the citation for the claim about women? I also know it to be true, but right now there are no citations for that fact aside from the transgender citations...
2552:. Different parameters, different criteria, different closers. We should not muddy the waters with so many options that a consensus becomes impossible. Such ideas can be worked out in future discussions. At this point, we are talking only about article name. —
2665:
Hey, just a heads up: I never said it was an unreasonable proposal. Simply that I disagree with its conclusions. I think it's a reasonable proposal that deserves to be answered in good faith. I would characterize that part of your comment as a possible
2508:
grand unified theory of sex (and gender!) differences in health, medicine, disease, etc but for now it will invite scope creep in a focused article. Less is more. State the actual focus accurately, don't expand it or obfuscate it as all of "medicine".
2775:
The person who made the proposal claims the two names are interchangeable. This is incorrect. Things like Autism and ADHD are NOT diseases, but they are subject to the topic medicine and would therefore belong in one article but not the other.
890:
I would say the compromise is to not mention gender at all. In fact, isn't that basically your position for other text - to separate sex and gender? Why not just say "female reproductive system" under the
Females heading and be done with it?
1580:. we're not supposed to be linking everyday words used in their normal manner, so links are not necessary for this. If we do it anyway, then don't link to a social-gender-related article but to a biological one (and just one, not two).
2066:
I was referring to these other sources (MO DoH, CDC, etc) as a way to show how they delineate "Disease" vs other "conditions." Not because I was citing them for any particular definition or quotation. You'll notice this is why I said:
1888:
which is used to describe a perturbation in the normal functioning of different systems in the body. Some disorders are not considered diseases, as there is not enough of a "smoking gun" to determine the causative process (the
1814:
but can't find "sex differences in medicine". Current use of "sex-related diseases" in article is not supported by sources; article needs to be coherent with title and "sex differences in disease" makes that much easier to do.
213:
2641:
I don't see anything wrong with asking why a proposal is necessary. I've usually found such questions help the discussion be more concise and purposeful than before. There is no need to make insinuations about a neutral
135:
150:
2312:
is no place in WP for description of those differences (unless we make an article for sex differences in syndromes, etc.). I think health is an umbrella term that would allow for an article of higher quality.
2793:: I would not place too much weight on search results of verbatim uses of the whole phrase "sex differences in medicine", "sex differences in disease", etc. We are not looking for the verbatim phrase to be a
1249:- if this is the language that gets everyone in agreement, hell yes I support it. It also is what's being used by professional organizations. Like Shibbolethink, this support include the removal of "woman".
1640:, in Journal of Women's Health with authors from the NIH's Office of Research on Women’s Health. The prominence of Women's Health organizations in sex differences is reflected in the content of the cite in
583:
1971:
throughly, contains every single diagnosis and even situation listed in this article. For some further examples, now simply demonstrating that the definition is not as clear as how you've presented it:
2075:
Overall, it seems you have misread my comment. I am sorry you disagree with my interpretation of these sources, I do not think that is a matter we will resolve here in any reasonable course of time. —
2023:
disease: A physical or mental disturbance involving symptoms (such as pain or feeling unwell), dysfunction or tissue damage, especially if these symptoms and signs form a recognisable clinical pattern.
2159:"In this review, we describe the sex differences in prevalence, onset, symptom profiles, and disease outcome that are evident in schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder."
2741:
to stop using "Sex differences in medicine". It made me believe the article was about gender differences. I support "Sex differences in disease", or "in health", or "in health and medicine".
616:
2196:
as well. Both would enable an expansion in this article's scope, which has long been mostly a couple of lists tied together with a minimal amount of prose. "Sex differences in health" has
935:
Please don't put words in my mouth. I reassess each situation as it comes, and offer compromises to try and achieve consensus, regardless of what I may personally feel about the answer.
171:
2703:
don't line up with the sources, the sources that support the content are about "sex differences in disease", there is relatively little RS out there for "sex differences in medicine".
2488:. Pregnancy is not a disease, and is not listed here; it will show up as a common factor in sex differences in disease. "Health" is an oddly inverted way of discussing these things.
1852:
disorders, syndromes, conditions, and yes, diseases. But these things are not interchangeable, they have actual meanings, regardless of how often the words are misused. For example,
1631:- "humans' is rather implicit here. Very simple and straight forward since, as has been demonstrated in the threads on this page, MEDRS uses man/woman synonymously with male/female.
2273:
I think this title would be much more appropriate to help the article become more comprehensive and free from many of the issues it currently has (e.g. list style, expert jargon).
2154:
345:
2150:
1296:
now per clear agreement above. As I said at the beginning of this discussion, "removing it in no way implies anything regarding any other text in the article present or future".
349:
44:
2868:
2217:
2037:
further stresses structural change, this time in negative terms, stating that disorder is “usually a weaker term than DISEASE, and not implying structural change.”1(p449)
2009:
Although the terms syndrome, disease, and disorder are commonly used interchangeably, they are in fact distinct and reflect different levels of conceptual understanding.
2216:
all associated with disease. The fact that you see a lot of google scholar hits for "sex differences in health" doesn't necessarily mean a whole lot here, since e.g.:
573:
2873:
738:
2043:
Diagnosis of a syndrome (such as
Tourette's syndrome or sarcoidosis) depends on identification of possible combinations of signs and symptoms displayed by a patient
2004:. The ICD has morphed and changed into a system of billing codes, a purpose for which it was not intended, but which it has been manipulated and distorted to fill
184:
225:
2103:
549:
79:
2034:
You are right that disease has (to a degree) a malleable definition. But the most commonly used definition in medicine involves a single pathological process.
2146:
2863:
2466:
is "a disease". Also, a person's capacity for pregnancy is a medical condition that is dependent upon biological sex, and it's definitely not "a disease".
2142:
1893:). Psychiatry, for example, rarely, if ever uses the term "disease" and prefers "disorder" as it is more easily and aptly applied to most of its conditions
494:
389:
1475:- When describing sex-differences, we should not link to articles about gender. It's confusing and gives the impression that these are one and the same. —
2212:
221:
217:
2297:"health" only occurs once in the body of the article, "disease" occurs ~22 times. How do you figure this article is more about "health" than "disease"?
1024:
As a side point, just noting for the record that while that link does talk about "sex assigned..." in a transgender context, it does also simply state,
2853:
2838:
1941:
All of which to say, we should not use "disease" in the title because it excludes a great many of the health conditions discussed on the page already.
1755:
The result of the move request was: Not moved. There's some support for "Sex differences in health" and variations, but little for the proposed name.
1492:- As Shibbolethink said, sex is not gender. With these wikilinks on this article we should be linking to sex related pages, not gender related pages.
675:
484:
379:
1457:
Feel free to add your own options (directly below these), and please restrict your responses/discussion to this question whenever possible. Thanks —
2221:
1964:
2225:
540:
517:
85:
2843:
2481:
2485:
615:
procedure applies to this page. This page is related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, which has been
2858:
2387:
2099:
2095:
1798:
460:
354:
2165:. No "sex differences in medicine" in those articles. The scope of the article is appropriately expanded with "sex differences in disease".
1794:
2197:
1644:. There is, naturally, no symmetrical cite for men's health organizations. SMcCandlish's comment on overlink is important. EDIT: To be sure
2059:
have to make do with identifying disorders by assessing the number and severity of individually non-diagnostic symptoms from an agreed list
30:
2429:
1873:
a recognizable complex of symptoms and findings which indicate a specific condition for which a direct cause is not necessarily understood
2141:
comments about the differentiation between notions like "syndrome" etc. are pretty easily shown to be, somehow archaic. Search MEDRS for
1746:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
2549:
2848:
2833:
2432:
gives all the heavy citation counts for review sex differences across disease areas, analogous to the current content of the article.
1807:
999:
more often) but it's still normal in medical research. I think I argued for something like this on
Knowledge (XXG) a long time ago...
99:
1673:
1591:
1196:
451:
412:
340:
301:
104:
20:
2228:, the latter doesn't even sound like the right way to find the information here (even though there are more hits in this case).
2458:, people outside the medical profession often think primarily of infectious diseases, and then maybe it will occur to them that
74:
2026:
1977:
635:
612:
276:
658:
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki
Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available
191:
2247:
2189:
1837:
1758:
992:
65:
2820:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
2201:
2566:
631:
2526:
2462:, diabetes, and cancer probably count, too. But they won't necessarily tell you that their back pain or their need for
2382:
arguments.Further, it is not my job to refute whatever
Maneesh says in every one of his comments, and doing so would be
1768:
1737:
2544:
Merges cannot be the outcome of a move discussion. Such a decision would need to arise from the consensus built in an
1811:
1786:
1327:
1323:
24:
2798:
2399:
what they do and do not find persuasive, and then they can respond accordingly. That is the nature of consensus. —
233:
208:
198:
109:
2652:
2322:
2283:
1537:
1235:
1122:
2724:. I agree with the above comment that this title change would restrict the scope of this article unnecessarily.
1833:
1790:
1648:
is not a "gender" article, it unambiguously focuses on female biology and defines "woman" in terms of "female".
977:
use male/female and avoid usage of man/woman altogether. Needless to say the discussion on that has been long.
623:
244:
2251:
2243:
2193:
1841:
1092:
694:
Straw poll on removing side point about transgender identity from bullet point about female reproductive system
126:
2383:
1747:
282:
1930:
2525:: the widening of scope being described by many here will significantly duplicate the scope of the existing
996:
2794:
177:
2806:
2622:
2574:
2513:
2471:
2129:
1620:
1497:
1266:
1016:
982:
1907:. Here are many other examples where these terms are used in a distinct manner by authoritative sources:
1878:
634:
may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the
627:
55:
2781:
2763:
1701:
1670:
1588:
1193:
1173:
851:
548:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
459:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1577:
70:
2801:
nature. Sources tend to write about sex differences in whatever specific thing they're interested in.
798:
760:
759:
Stenzel, Ashley E.; Moysich, Kirsten B.; Ferrando, Cecile A.; Starbuck, Kristen D. (1 December 2020).
2729:
2644:
2314:
2275:
2158:
2039:
1905:
1858:
is typically used in medicine to refer to a pathological state for which we have an identified cause
1529:
1227:
1134:
1114:
264:
2742:
1750:
after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
1085:
663:
2162:
2746:
2687:
2603:
2553:
2535:
2400:
2395:
2372:
2350:
2255:
2107:
2076:
1990:
1960:
1947:
1924:
1802:
1512:
1476:
1458:
1210:
1146:
940:
905:
873:
683:
249:
165:
2802:
2708:
2618:
2570:
2509:
2493:
2467:
2437:
2339:
2302:
2233:
2185:
2170:
2125:
2052:
1982:
1896:
1820:
1653:
1604:
1564:
1493:
1282:
1250:
1072:
1055:
1000:
978:
963:
818:
780:
667:
51:
2364:
2061:
1894:
1859:
2777:
2759:
2674:, presenting only two possible choices of what I could be suggesting. The truth is actually
2002:
Encounter for supervision of normal pregnancy, unspecified, unspecified trimester. (Z34. 90)
1764:
1718:
1697:
1665:
1637:
1583:
1188:
1169:
810:
772:
246:
2545:
904:
If we are talking about sex, then we shouldn't use the term "woman." That's my position. —
2725:
1298:
1030:
924:
893:
860:
835:
545:
443:
332:
1973:
698:
I propose to remove the underlined text from the following bullet point under "Females":
2810:
2785:
2767:
2750:
2733:
2712:
2695:
2658:
2626:
2611:
2578:
2561:
2539:
2517:
2497:
2475:
2441:
2408:
2376:
2358:
2343:
2328:
2306:
2289:
2263:
2237:
2204:
2174:
2133:
2115:
2084:
1994:
1955:
1824:
1779:
1722:
1705:
1678:
1657:
1623:
1596:
1568:
1543:
1519:
1501:
1484:
1466:
1304:
1286:
1269:
1241:
1218:
1201:
1177:
1154:
1128:
1102:
1076:
1059:
1036:
1019:
986:
967:
948:
930:
913:
899:
881:
866:
841:
687:
2000:
agreed upon below by other participants here and standards set elsewhere. But it does:
702:
248:
2014:
development. A disease is also composed of signs and symptoms but has a known etiology
532:
511:
2827:
2569:
is still a policy. Merges can be the outcome of any discussion, including this one.
2531:
2459:
2391:
2368:
2051:
These classifications are also per the DSM, which is a direct descendent of the ICD.
1986:
706:
679:
2592:
This article has existed at this name for almost 19 years. Since February 12, 2003.
1912:
958:
Let’s just say female and not mention woman. Saying female just makes things easier.
604:
2704:
2489:
2433:
2335:
2298:
2229:
2166:
2068:
1816:
1649:
1560:
1278:
1209:
it's confusing, unnecessary, and not supported by the sources currently provided —
1068:
1051:
959:
1918:
920:
Noting here that Shibbolethink already elsewhere answered "no" to including this.
858:
above that they originally added it and that they now agree it should be removed.
2016:
1773:
1714:
776:
654:
814:
2463:
973:
I suggested this previously except on a wider basis, that this article should
433:
322:
821:
783:
1900:
There are also many syndromes which are more and more being referred to as "
716:
427:
406:
1810:). You can also find "sex differences in disease" in top-tier source like
1207:
Support removal, but also do not include the word "woman" in the sentence.
1884:
1867:
1638:
Sex as a Biological Variable: A 5-Year Progress Report and Call to Action
456:
125:
1442:) - Use 'females' and 'males' and link to 'Woman#Health' and 'no link'.
761:"Clinical needs for transgender men in the gynecologic oncology setting"
2005:
1854:
2600:
What has changed recently that means this article requires a new name?
2363:
Hi, actually, I would very strongly argue that collaboration is not a
2045:
1968:
1876:
1397:
1388:
1385:
1365:
712:
1861:
1662:
How long will it stay that way is kind of an open question, though.
1362:) - Link to the sex-based article (subsection on mammals) (1 link).
1137:
I think, likely, the issue to some users around here is the use of "
1026:
Which term means the classification of people as male or female? Sex
995:... The sex-gender language is outdated in social sciences (we use
316:
295:
2588:
Perhaps the most important unanswered question about this proposal
1933:: "Disorders may be caused by genetic factors, disease, or trauma"
1645:
1641:
1632:
1445:
1425:
1345:
1311:
797:
Dutton, Lauren; Koenig, Karel; Fennie, Kristopher (1 July 2008).
1394:
1371:
711:
occur mostly in women (except in the rare instances where other
352:. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at
1801:(223 hits), the scope of the material is identical (look at an
1696:
is the least ambiguous. Definately don't link to a subsection.
141:
1431:
1351:
1315:
599:
258:
250:
15:
2041:
These other terms, however, have much more fixed definitions:
1322:
This is with regards to the first sentences in the sections "
344:, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the
622:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the
149:
2069:
examples where these terms are used in a distinct manner
799:"Gynecologic Care of the Female-to-Male Transgender Man"
2595:
2192:, which I think should be at least considered. Perhaps
1277:- How'd I miss this? Anyways, adding to the consensus.
921:
855:
2334:
disease/syndrome/disorder are often used syonymously.
709:
and other diseases of the female reproductive system
649:
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
1382:) - Link to the female and human articles (2 links)
544:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
455:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
197:
2155:"sex differences in medicine" "Sjögren’s syndrome"
2151:"sex differences in disease" "Sjögren’s syndrome"
2678:I am simply echoing the enduring rule of thumb:
2218:"sex differences in health" "Sjögren's syndrome"
937:I would appreciate it if you struck this comment
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
2149:(95 hits). EDIT: Look at any specific disease:
2071:not "here are some more quotes or definitions."
1224:Support according to Shibbolethink's objections
348:and that biomedical information in any article
939:and allowed me to answer on my own. Thanks. —
1422:) - change the plug to the gender-based term
346:Manual of Style for medicine-related articles
157:
8:
2271:Support move to "Sex differences in health".
2157:(6 hits). EDIT AGAIN: Same with "disorder"
2246:I would support either of these options. (
1803:article with "sex differences in medicine"
1736:The following is a closed discussion of a
1310:Straw poll: Should "female human" link to
558:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Women's Health
506:
401:
290:
2106:have been notified of this discussion. —
1985:as they made the same argument below). --
803:Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health
676:Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment
355:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Medicine
2213:"sex differences in health and medicine"
2147:"sex differences in medicine" "syndrome"
1965:International Classification of Diseases
2482:"sex differences in infectious disease"
2480:This page should also have entries for
2143:"sex differences in disease" "syndrome"
1145:" to refer to the same set of people.—
730:
674:Above undated message substituted from
508:
403:
292:
262:
2869:Low-importance women's health articles
2248:Sex differences in health and medicine
2190:Sex differences in health and medicine
2057:
2042:
2035:
2022:
2012:
2008:
2001:
1944:(edited 15:06, 25 December 2021 (UTC))
1872:
1838:Sex differences in health and medicine
1025:
2452:sex differences in medical conditions
2224:match the information here more than
183:
7:
1967:. Which, if you examine the current
1921:: "Health Conditions & Diseases"
538:This article is within the scope of
469:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Feminism
449:This article is within the scope of
364:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Medicine
338:This article is within the scope of
2874:WikiProject Women's Health articles
2486:"sex differences in lower backpain"
2222:"sex differences in disease" cancer
739:"Ovarian Cancer in Transgender Men"
561:Template:WikiProject Women's Health
281:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
2226:"sex differences in health" cancer
1509:, 3 is an unnecessary chain link.
741:. The National LGBT Cancer Network
14:
2670:.This comment is also creating a
50:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome!
2854:Low-importance Feminism articles
2839:Mid-importance medicine articles
2816:The discussion above is closed.
2617:campaign now in progress at AE?
2598:, it has never had another name.
2567:Knowledge (XXG):Ignore all rules
1797:(1890 hits) is more common than
653:
603:
531:
510:
436:
426:
405:
350:use high-quality medical sources
325:
315:
294:
263:
232:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
2864:B-Class women's health articles
2680:if it ain't broke, don't fix it
1729:Requested move 25 December 2021
1141:" and then immediately after, "
578:This article has been rated as
489:This article has been rated as
384:This article has been rated as
2844:All WikiProject Medicine pages
1555:& Human adult females are
1:
2859:WikiProject Feminism articles
2786:13:54, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
2768:13:30, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
2751:01:24, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
2734:21:48, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
2713:22:43, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
2696:14:46, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
2682:. In this case, I am asking:
2659:14:40, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
2627:14:30, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
2612:07:24, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
2579:06:29, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
2562:06:42, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
2540:05:56, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
2518:04:59, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
2498:03:15, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
2476:02:47, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
2442:13:08, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
2409:05:58, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
2388:high school/college forensics
2377:05:56, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
2359:19:18, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
2344:17:57, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
2329:16:38, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
2307:16:05, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
2290:11:04, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
2264:15:03, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
2238:08:18, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
2205:07:47, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
2175:03:16, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
2134:01:00, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
2116:00:50, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
2085:06:35, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
1995:05:56, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
1956:00:48, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
1825:00:18, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
1799:"sex differences in medicine"
1723:14:57, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
1706:00:17, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
1679:23:58, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
1663:
1658:17:39, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
1624:17:35, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
1597:17:29, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
1581:
1569:17:09, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
1544:16:24, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
1520:16:22, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
1502:15:47, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
1485:15:36, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
1467:15:35, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
1305:19:32, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
1287:19:45, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
1270:17:34, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
1242:16:23, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
1219:15:40, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
1202:14:17, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
1186:
1178:13:53, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
1155:15:19, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
1129:10:42, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
1103:08:48, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
1077:05:21, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
1060:04:57, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
1037:05:01, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
1020:02:34, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
987:02:29, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
968:01:54, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
949:15:03, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
931:05:01, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
914:15:06, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
900:00:59, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
882:23:42, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
867:22:59, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
842:22:57, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
636:contentious topics procedures
552:and see a list of open tasks.
472:Template:WikiProject Feminism
463:and see a list of open tasks.
367:Template:WikiProject Medicine
42:Put new text under old text.
2797:; the article title is of a
2527:Gender disparities in health
1795:"sex differences in disease"
688:09:02, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
2811:23:39, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
1927:: "Conditions and Diseases"
1915:: "Diseases and Conditions"
1787:Sex differences in medicine
1780:01:42, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
777:10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.09.038
25:Sex differences in medicine
2890:
2104:WikiProject Women's Health
1834:Sex differences in disease
1791:Sex differences in disease
1139:female reproductive system
815:10.1016/j.jmwh.2008.02.003
715:have said organs, such as
624:purpose of Knowledge (XXG)
541:WikiProject Women's Health
495:project's importance scale
390:project's importance scale
2849:B-Class Feminism articles
2834:B-Class medicine articles
2602:And why did it change? —
2454:. When you use the word
2448:sex differences in health
2430:"sex differences" disease
2386:the process. This is not
2252:Sex differences in health
2194:Sex differences in health
2188:had previously suggested
1931:National Cancer Institute
1842:Sex differences in health
1314:and "male human" link to
638:before editing this page.
577:
526:
488:
421:
383:
310:
289:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
2818:Please do not modify it.
1882:This is as opposed to a
1743:Please do not modify it.
1551:- Human adult males are
632:normal editorial process
997:sex assignment at birth
991:It would adhere to the
619:as a contentious topic.
564:women's health articles
1342:) - Keep it as it is.
628:standards of behaviour
271:This article is rated
75:avoid personal attacks
662:. Student editor(s):
275:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
226:Auto-archiving period
123:Find medical sources:
100:Neutral point of view
2100:WikiProject Feminism
2096:WikiProject Medicine
765:Gynecologic Oncology
452:WikiProject Feminism
341:WikiProject Medicine
105:No original research
2244:Firefangledfeathers
2202:Firefangledfeathers
2183:
1473:Options 2, 3, or 4
1408:) - Have no link.
666:. Peer reviewers:
660:on the course page
613:contentious topics
277:content assessment
129:
86:dispute resolution
47:
2181:
2118:
1945:
1919:MO Dept of Health
1762:
1759:non-admin closure
1522:
1452:
1435:
1415:
1401:
1375:
1355:
643:
642:
598:
597:
594:
593:
590:
589:
505:
504:
501:
500:
475:Feminism articles
400:
399:
396:
395:
370:medicine articles
257:
256:
128:Source guidelines
127:
66:Assume good faith
43:
2881:
2758:per Rreagan007--
2693:
2690:
2657:
2655:
2651:
2647:
2609:
2606:
2559:
2556:
2550:Merge Discussion
2406:
2403:
2356:
2353:
2327:
2325:
2321:
2317:
2288:
2286:
2282:
2278:
2261:
2258:
2113:
2110:
2093:
2082:
2079:
2070:
1953:
1950:
1943:
1776:
1756:
1745:
1677:
1617:
1614:
1611:
1608:
1595:
1542:
1540:
1536:
1532:
1515:
1510:
1482:
1479:
1464:
1461:
1443:
1423:
1409:
1383:
1363:
1343:
1303:
1263:
1260:
1257:
1254:
1240:
1238:
1234:
1230:
1216:
1213:
1200:
1168:per Crossroads.
1152:
1149:
1127:
1125:
1121:
1117:
1095:
1090:
1050:per Crossroads.
1035:
1013:
1010:
1007:
1004:
993:AMA's guidelines
946:
943:
929:
911:
908:
898:
879:
876:
865:
852:Feralcateater000
840:
826:
825:
794:
788:
787:
756:
750:
749:
747:
746:
735:
690:
657:
607:
600:
584:importance scale
566:
565:
562:
559:
556:
535:
528:
527:
522:
514:
507:
477:
476:
473:
470:
467:
446:
441:
440:
439:
430:
423:
422:
417:
409:
402:
372:
371:
368:
365:
362:
335:
330:
329:
328:
319:
312:
311:
306:
298:
291:
274:
268:
267:
259:
251:
237:
236:
227:
202:
201:
187:
161:
153:
145:
131:
95:Article policies
16:
2889:
2888:
2884:
2883:
2882:
2880:
2879:
2878:
2824:
2823:
2822:
2821:
2691:
2688:
2672:false dichotomy
2654:Please ping me!
2653:
2649:
2645:
2643:
2607:
2604:
2557:
2554:
2464:reading glasses
2404:
2401:
2354:
2351:
2349:environment. —
2324:Please ping me!
2323:
2319:
2315:
2313:
2285:Please ping me!
2284:
2280:
2276:
2274:
2259:
2256:
2111:
2108:
2080:
2077:
1951:
1948:
1845:
1774:
1741:
1731:
1615:
1612:
1609:
1606:
1539:Please ping me!
1538:
1534:
1530:
1528:
1513:
1480:
1477:
1462:
1459:
1410:(female humans
1320:
1297:
1261:
1258:
1255:
1252:
1237:Please ping me!
1236:
1232:
1228:
1226:
1214:
1211:
1183:Support removal
1150:
1147:
1135:A. C. Santacruz
1124:Please ping me!
1123:
1119:
1115:
1113:
1093:
1086:
1067:per Crossroads.
1029:
1011:
1008:
1005:
1002:
944:
941:
923:
909:
906:
892:
877:
874:
859:
834:
830:
829:
796:
795:
791:
758:
757:
753:
744:
742:
737:
736:
732:
696:
673:
651:
626:, any expected
563:
560:
557:
554:
553:
520:
474:
471:
468:
465:
464:
444:Feminism portal
442:
437:
435:
415:
369:
366:
363:
360:
359:
333:Medicine portal
331:
326:
324:
304:
272:
253:
252:
247:
224:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
2887:
2885:
2877:
2876:
2871:
2866:
2861:
2856:
2851:
2846:
2841:
2836:
2826:
2825:
2815:
2814:
2813:
2788:
2770:
2753:
2736:
2718:
2717:
2716:
2715:
2700:
2699:
2698:
2663:
2662:
2661:
2632:
2631:
2630:
2629:
2585:
2584:
2583:
2582:
2581:
2520:
2502:
2501:
2500:
2444:
2423:
2422:
2421:
2420:
2419:
2418:
2417:
2416:
2415:
2414:
2413:
2412:
2411:
2384:wp:bludgeoning
2268:
2267:
2266:
2240:
2179:
2178:
2177:
2153:(78 hits) vs.
2119:
2091:
2090:
2089:
2088:
2087:
2074:
2073:
2072:
2065:
2064:
2063:
2056:
2055:
2054:
2050:
2049:
2048:
2047:
2033:
2032:
2030:
2029:
2028:
2019:
2018:
1938:
1937:
1936:
1935:
1934:
1928:
1922:
1916:
1899:
1881:
1864:
1832:
1785:
1783:
1753:
1752:
1738:requested move
1732:
1730:
1727:
1726:
1725:
1708:
1683:
1682:
1681:
1626:
1599:
1571:
1546:
1523:
1504:
1487:
1455:
1454:
1436:
1416:
1402:
1376:
1356:
1331:
1319:
1308:
1290:
1289:
1272:
1244:
1221:
1204:
1180:
1162:
1161:
1160:
1159:
1158:
1157:
1106:
1105:
1088:Pyxis Solitary
1079:
1062:
1044:
1043:
1042:
1041:
1040:
1039:
956:
955:
954:
953:
952:
951:
918:
917:
916:
885:
884:
869:
828:
827:
809:(4): 331–337.
789:
771:(3): 899–905.
751:
729:
728:
724:
723:
721:
703:Ovarian cancer
695:
692:
650:
647:
645:
641:
640:
608:
596:
595:
592:
591:
588:
587:
580:Low-importance
576:
570:
569:
567:
555:Women's Health
550:the discussion
546:Women's Health
536:
524:
523:
521:Low‑importance
518:Women's Health
515:
503:
502:
499:
498:
491:Low-importance
487:
481:
480:
478:
461:the discussion
448:
447:
431:
419:
418:
416:Low‑importance
410:
398:
397:
394:
393:
386:Mid-importance
382:
376:
375:
373:
337:
336:
320:
308:
307:
305:Mid‑importance
299:
287:
286:
280:
269:
255:
254:
245:
243:
242:
239:
238:
204:
203:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2886:
2875:
2872:
2870:
2867:
2865:
2862:
2860:
2857:
2855:
2852:
2850:
2847:
2845:
2842:
2840:
2837:
2835:
2832:
2831:
2829:
2819:
2812:
2808:
2804:
2800:
2796:
2792:
2789:
2787:
2783:
2779:
2774:
2771:
2769:
2765:
2761:
2757:
2754:
2752:
2748:
2744:
2740:
2737:
2735:
2731:
2727:
2723:
2720:
2719:
2714:
2710:
2706:
2701:
2697:
2694:
2685:
2681:
2677:
2673:
2669:
2664:
2660:
2656:
2648:
2640:
2639:
2638:
2637:
2636:
2635:
2634:
2633:
2628:
2624:
2620:
2615:
2614:
2613:
2610:
2601:
2597:
2593:
2589:
2586:
2580:
2576:
2572:
2568:
2565:
2564:
2563:
2560:
2551:
2547:
2543:
2542:
2541:
2537:
2533:
2528:
2524:
2521:
2519:
2515:
2511:
2506:
2503:
2499:
2495:
2491:
2487:
2483:
2479:
2478:
2477:
2473:
2469:
2465:
2461:
2460:heart disease
2457:
2453:
2449:
2445:
2443:
2439:
2435:
2431:
2427:
2424:
2410:
2407:
2397:
2393:
2392:policy debate
2389:
2385:
2380:
2379:
2378:
2374:
2370:
2366:
2362:
2361:
2360:
2357:
2347:
2346:
2345:
2341:
2337:
2332:
2331:
2330:
2326:
2318:
2310:
2309:
2308:
2304:
2300:
2296:
2293:
2292:
2291:
2287:
2279:
2272:
2269:
2265:
2262:
2253:
2249:
2245:
2241:
2239:
2235:
2231:
2227:
2223:
2219:
2214:
2211:
2208:
2207:
2206:
2203:
2199:
2198:5,320 results
2195:
2191:
2187:
2180:
2176:
2172:
2168:
2164:
2160:
2156:
2152:
2148:
2144:
2140:
2137:
2136:
2135:
2131:
2127:
2123:
2120:
2117:
2114:
2105:
2101:
2097:
2092:
2086:
2083:
2062:
2060:
2053:
2046:
2044:
2040:
2038:
2031:
2027:
2024:
2021:
2020:
2017:
2015:
2010:
2006:
2003:
1998:
1997:
1996:
1992:
1988:
1984:
1979:
1975:
1970:
1966:
1962:
1961:Shibbolethink
1959:
1958:
1957:
1954:
1942:
1939:
1932:
1929:
1926:
1925:Johns Hopkins
1923:
1920:
1917:
1914:
1911:
1910:
1909:
1908:
1906:
1903:
1897:
1895:
1892:
1887:
1886:
1879:
1877:
1874:
1870:
1869:
1862:
1860:
1857:
1856:
1850:
1846:
1843:
1839:
1835:
1829:
1828:
1827:
1826:
1822:
1818:
1813:
1809:
1806:(source like
1804:
1800:
1796:
1792:
1788:
1782:
1781:
1778:
1777:
1770:
1766:
1760:
1751:
1749:
1744:
1739:
1734:
1733:
1728:
1724:
1720:
1716:
1713:- "No link".
1712:
1709:
1707:
1703:
1699:
1695:
1691:
1687:
1684:
1680:
1675:
1672:
1669:
1668:
1661:
1660:
1659:
1655:
1651:
1647:
1643:
1639:
1634:
1630:
1627:
1625:
1622:
1619:
1618:
1603:
1600:
1598:
1593:
1590:
1587:
1586:
1579:
1575:
1572:
1570:
1566:
1562:
1558:
1554:
1550:
1547:
1545:
1541:
1533:
1527:
1524:
1521:
1517:
1516:
1508:
1505:
1503:
1499:
1495:
1491:
1490:Option 2 or 3
1488:
1486:
1483:
1474:
1471:
1470:
1469:
1468:
1465:
1450:
1447:
1441:
1437:
1433:
1430:
1427:
1421:
1417:
1413:
1407:
1403:
1399:
1396:
1393:
1390:
1387:
1381:
1377:
1373:
1370:
1367:
1366:female humans
1361:
1357:
1353:
1350:
1347:
1346:female humans
1341:
1337:
1336:
1335:
1334:
1329:
1325:
1317:
1313:
1309:
1307:
1306:
1302:
1301:
1295:
1288:
1284:
1280:
1276:
1273:
1271:
1268:
1265:
1264:
1248:
1245:
1243:
1239:
1231:
1225:
1222:
1220:
1217:
1208:
1205:
1203:
1198:
1195:
1192:
1191:
1184:
1181:
1179:
1175:
1171:
1167:
1164:
1163:
1156:
1153:
1144:
1140:
1136:
1132:
1131:
1130:
1126:
1118:
1110:
1109:
1108:
1107:
1104:
1100:
1096:
1091:
1089:
1083:
1080:
1078:
1074:
1070:
1066:
1063:
1061:
1057:
1053:
1049:
1046:
1045:
1038:
1034:
1033:
1027:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1018:
1015:
1014:
998:
994:
990:
989:
988:
984:
980:
976:
972:
971:
970:
969:
965:
961:
950:
947:
938:
934:
933:
932:
928:
927:
922:
919:
915:
912:
903:
902:
901:
897:
896:
889:
888:
887:
886:
883:
880:
870:
868:
864:
863:
857:
853:
850:as proposer.
849:
846:
845:
844:
843:
839:
838:
823:
820:
816:
812:
808:
804:
800:
793:
790:
785:
782:
778:
774:
770:
766:
762:
755:
752:
740:
734:
731:
727:
722:
720:
718:
714:
708:
707:endometriosis
704:
701:
700:
699:
693:
691:
689:
685:
681:
677:
671:
669:
665:
661:
656:
648:
646:
639:
637:
633:
629:
625:
620:
618:
614:
609:
606:
602:
601:
585:
581:
575:
572:
571:
568:
551:
547:
543:
542:
537:
534:
530:
529:
525:
519:
516:
513:
509:
496:
492:
486:
483:
482:
479:
462:
458:
454:
453:
445:
434:
432:
429:
425:
424:
420:
414:
411:
408:
404:
391:
387:
381:
378:
377:
374:
357:
356:
351:
347:
343:
342:
334:
323:
321:
318:
314:
313:
309:
303:
300:
297:
293:
288:
284:
278:
270:
266:
261:
260:
241:
240:
235:
231:
223:
219:
215:
212:
210:
206:
205:
200:
196:
193:
190:
186:
182:
179:
176:
173:
172:ScienceDirect
170:
167:
164:
160:
156:
152:
148:
144:
140:
137:
134:
130:
124:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
2817:
2803:Adumbrativus
2790:
2772:
2755:
2738:
2721:
2684:Is it broke?
2683:
2679:
2675:
2671:
2667:
2619:Sesquivalent
2599:
2596:the move log
2591:
2587:
2571:WhatamIdoing
2522:
2510:Sesquivalent
2504:
2468:WhatamIdoing
2455:
2451:
2447:
2425:
2294:
2270:
2209:
2186:SandyGeorgia
2138:
2126:Sideswipe9th
2121:
1983:Sideswipe9th
1940:
1901:
1890:
1883:
1866:
1853:
1848:
1830:
1784:
1772:
1754:
1742:
1735:
1710:
1693:
1689:
1685:
1666:
1642:Woman#Health
1633:Woman#Health
1628:
1605:
1601:
1584:
1573:
1556:
1552:
1548:
1525:
1511:
1506:
1494:Sideswipe9th
1489:
1472:
1456:
1448:
1439:
1428:
1419:
1414:male humans)
1411:
1405:
1391:
1379:
1368:
1359:
1348:
1339:
1332:
1321:
1299:
1293:
1291:
1274:
1251:
1246:
1223:
1206:
1189:
1182:
1165:
1142:
1138:
1098:
1087:
1081:
1064:
1047:
1031:
1001:
979:Sideswipe9th
974:
957:
936:
925:
894:
861:
847:
836:
831:
806:
802:
792:
768:
764:
754:
743:. Retrieved
733:
725:
710:
697:
672:
668:Haileewright
652:
644:
621:
610:
579:
539:
490:
450:
385:
353:
339:
283:WikiProjects
229:
207:
194:
188:
180:
174:
168:
162:
154:
146:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
2799:descriptive
2795:common name
2778:Licks-rocks
2760:Ozzie10aaaa
2450:or perhaps
2446:I'd prefer
1891:prime mover
1871:, which is
1748:move review
1698:Masterhatch
1688:Linking to
1667:SMcCandlish
1585:SMcCandlish
1578:WP:OVERLINK
1372:male humans
1352:male humans
1190:SMcCandlish
1170:Masterhatch
31:not a forum
2828:Categories
2726:Rreagan007
2689:Shibboleth
2605:Shibboleth
2555:Shibboleth
2428:the query
2402:Shibboleth
2352:Shibboleth
2257:Shibboleth
2109:Shibboleth
2078:Shibboleth
1949:Shibboleth
1902:conditions
1836:, Support
1602:2, 3, or 4
1478:Shibboleth
1460:Shibboleth
1300:Crossroads
1292:It's been
1212:Shibboleth
1148:Shibboleth
1032:Crossroads
942:Shibboleth
926:Crossroads
907:Shibboleth
895:Crossroads
875:Shibboleth
862:Crossroads
837:Crossroads
745:2021-02-21
726:References
617:designated
2668:straw man
2646:Santacruz
2642:question.
2396:spreading
2316:Santacruz
2277:Santacruz
1865:Versus a
1531:Santacruz
1229:Santacruz
1116:Santacruz
1084:. Ditto.
822:1526-9523
784:0090-8258
717:trans men
630:, or any
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
2743:Hosortyr
2676:neither.
2532:Xurizuri
2394:, where
2369:Xurizuri
1987:Xurizuri
1885:disorder
1868:syndrome
1849:proposed
1514:nableezy
1333:Options:
680:PrimeBOT
466:Feminism
457:Feminism
413:Feminism
361:Medicine
302:Medicine
209:Archives
178:Springer
143:Cochrane
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
2791:Comment
2739:Support
2705:Maneesh
2523:Comment
2505:Support
2490:Maneesh
2456:disease
2434:Maneesh
2426:Comment
2336:Maneesh
2299:Maneesh
2295:Comment
2230:Maneesh
2210:Comment
2200:, FYI.
2182:Comment
2167:Maneesh
2139:Comment
1875:(ibid,
1855:disease
1831:Oppose
1817:Maneesh
1650:Maneesh
1576:. Per
1561:GoodDay
1446:females
1326:" and "
1324:Females
1294:removed
1279:GoodDay
1275:Support
1247:Support
1166:Support
1099:L not Q
1082:Support
1069:CycoMa1
1065:Support
1052:Maneesh
1048:Support
960:CycoMa1
848:Support
713:genders
664:SWillow
582:on the
493:on the
388:on the
273:B-class
230:90 days
2773:Oppose
2756:oppose
2722:Oppose
2122:Oppose
2102:, and
2094:Note:
1969:ICD-11
1840:&
1775:buidhe
1715:Tewdar
1621:(talk)
1574:4 or 2
1398:humans
1389:humans
1386:female
1267:(talk)
1017:(talk)
279:scale.
166:OpenMD
136:PubMed
1694:woman
1646:woman
1557:women
1451:males
1426:women
1328:Males
1312:woman
1143:women
1094:(yak)
854:also
214:Index
192:Wiley
84:Seek
2807:talk
2782:talk
2764:talk
2747:talk
2730:talk
2709:talk
2623:talk
2594:Per
2575:talk
2536:talk
2514:talk
2494:talk
2472:talk
2438:talk
2373:talk
2365:vote
2340:talk
2303:talk
2254:) —
2250:and
2234:talk
2171:talk
2130:talk
1991:talk
1978:AIHW
1976:and
1974:AHRQ
1847:The
1821:talk
1812:this
1808:this
1719:talk
1702:talk
1692:and
1654:talk
1565:talk
1498:talk
1395:male
1283:talk
1174:talk
1073:talk
1056:talk
983:talk
975:only
964:talk
856:said
819:ISSN
781:ISSN
684:talk
611:The
185:Trip
159:Gale
151:DOAJ
73:and
2692:ink
2608:ink
2558:ink
2548:or
2546:AfD
2405:ink
2390:or
2355:ink
2260:ink
2112:ink
2081:ink
2011:...
1952:ink
1913:CDC
1880:).
1690:man
1676:😼
1616:Fir
1613:een
1610:rgr
1607:Eve
1594:😼
1553:men
1481:ink
1463:ink
1432:men
1316:man
1262:Fir
1259:een
1256:rgr
1253:Eve
1215:ink
1199:😼
1151:ink
1012:Fir
1009:een
1006:rgr
1003:Eve
945:ink
910:ink
878:ink
811:doi
773:doi
769:159
678:by
574:Low
485:Low
380:Mid
199:TWL
2830::
2809:)
2784:)
2766:)
2749:)
2732:)
2711:)
2686:—
2625:)
2590::
2577:)
2538:)
2516:)
2496:)
2484:,
2474:)
2440:)
2375:)
2342:)
2305:)
2236:)
2184::
2173:)
2161:,
2132:)
2098:,
2025:"
1993:)
1946:—
1898:.
1823:)
1793:–
1789:→
1771:)
1767:·
1740:.
1721:)
1704:)
1664:—
1656:)
1582:—
1567:)
1559:.
1518:-
1500:)
1285:)
1187:—
1176:)
1101:.
1097:.
1075:)
1058:)
1028:.
985:)
966:)
872:—
817:.
807:53
805:.
801:.
779:.
767:.
763:.
719:.)
705:,
686:)
670:.
228::
220:,
216:,
54:;
2805:(
2780:(
2762:(
2745:(
2728:(
2707:(
2650:⁂
2621:(
2573:(
2534:(
2512:(
2492:(
2470:(
2436:(
2371:(
2338:(
2320:⁂
2301:(
2281:⁂
2242:@
2232:(
2169:(
2128:(
1989:(
1863:.
1844:.
1819:(
1769:c
1765:t
1763:(
1761:)
1757:(
1717:(
1711:4
1700:(
1686:1
1674:¢
1671:☏
1652:(
1629:6
1592:¢
1589:☏
1563:(
1549:1
1535:⁂
1526:2
1507:2
1496:(
1453:)
1449:·
1444:(
1440:6
1438:(
1434:)
1429:·
1424:(
1420:5
1418:(
1412:·
1406:4
1404:(
1400:)
1392:·
1384:(
1380:3
1378:(
1374:)
1369:·
1364:(
1360:2
1358:(
1354:)
1349:·
1344:(
1340:1
1338:(
1330:"
1318:?
1281:(
1233:⁂
1197:¢
1194:☏
1172:(
1133:@
1120:⁂
1071:(
1054:(
981:(
962:(
824:.
813::
786:.
775::
748:.
682:(
586:.
497:.
392:.
358:.
285::
222:2
218:1
211::
195:·
189:·
181:·
175:·
169:·
163:·
155:·
147:·
139:·
133:·
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
