Knowledge

Talk:Self-induced abortion

Source 📝

1342:, you read malice in my edits where there is none. Instead, just a newer editor's mistakes. I don't want to censor the content at all, but instead to update it based on the most recent and rigorous science. I agree that it would be historically inaccurate not to include dangerous methods, and as I've mentioned, I think those details belong in the history section. The most common self-induced abortion methods in 2019 are abortion pills. Of course, more "dangerous" methods are still used today, which is why I mention methods like "injury to the uterus" and "physical harm to the body" in my edits. I agree that it would be inaccurate to leave these out, but I do not think it is accurate to detail methods from one specific country (India, per previous content) and call it accurate or thorough. Per the comment you have on my page, yes, we have lots of global evidence that the most common documented self-induced abortion methods are abortion pills, and also that women continue to use other methods (such as herbs, mixtures, alcohol, inflicting violence on themselves) when pills aren't available or known about. 1315:, which is appropriate when there is a content dispute. It is unfortunate when an editor deletes sourced content in order to replace it with other sourced content, because the reversion to the status quo necessitates the deletion of the new content, but that is the nature of content disputes. MEDRS, of course, does not apply to disclosing factual historical beliefs in the effectiveness of methods, and it is frankly absurd to delete, for example, all references to coathangers, where these are themselves a symbol of the legal abortion movement. With respect to censorship, the removing editor said himself above that he rewrote the section "to delete details of dangerous methods", which appears to be intended to hide the fact that dangerous methods were used. 1391:) reviewed self-induced (they refer to it as "self-managed") abortion studies over the last 30+ years and found that abortion pills are most common method used. Other methods they cite include herbs, physical trauma of all kinds (like those you name), actions like jumping from a high place or excessive exercise, etc. This review specifically says that before 2000, 14 includes studies reported on the use of plants/herbs, physical trauma, intrauterine trauma, and alcohol use, and only two studies mentioned misoprostol. Out of a total of 93 included studies that were published during or after the year 2000, the majority documented use of misoprostol alone or mifepristone/misoprostol in combination, followed up plants and herbs as the next most common. 1473:
are approved methods including induction of abortion with medication, described below, as well as unapproved and unsafe methods which can be broadly categorized as either consuming toxic substances, putting substances into the vagina and/or uterus, and traumatizing the cervix and/or uterus with instruments or foreign bodies (e.g. stick, hanger). Then the methods section could have a sub-section for "Approved Regimens for self-managed abortion" containing most of the info already there and another for. "Unsafe self-managed abortion" focusing on management of unsafe abortion complications, as there is literature on that. This distinction between the two types of self managed abortion is so important. Thanks for your thoughts. --
1036:. I believe that an article that primarily focuses on methods is going to be incomplete and unencyclopedic. In addition to "how", there should be substantial information on "who" (e.g., mostly poor women), "where" (e.g., is it a rural phenomenon?), "when" (e.g., is it less common now than in previous centuries?), and "why" (e.g., what alternatives are realistically available?). Outcomes are also important: "You can stick a knitting needle up there" should always be followed by "but you might bleed to death afterwards". There should be a link to 286: 265: 375: 354: 190: 975:
resulted in failure or worse. I'll submit a draft that organizes and itemizes these medically unsafe and ineffective methods, including the history of some (if/where/when appropriate), but has the primary focus of updating and strengthening this article's focus on Self-induced Abortion, as well as providing the latest medical information. Thanks for your input. /Lakshmi Singh
1190:
performed in the country where it is illegal or in others where its practice is legal or less punishable (abortive tourism). Clandestine abortion, when carried out in countries where it is illegal, is usually practiced in conditions of sanitary or legal insecurity; when it is carried out in other countries it can be carried out in conditions of sanitary and legal security.
234: 457: 1278:
presume that there was no problem with the material added and focus discussion only on what they had originally removed? DataNerdMPH identified some problems with the material, both in factual content and in connection with MEDRS (it looks like you've restored primary research, for example), which is
866:
This Knowledge article is about self-induced abortion and should therefore focus on safe and medically effective methods - while reviewing numerous unsafe and ineffective practices. The Fielding letter, which I deleted, is both extremely dated in that regard, and digresses from the article's intent.
775:
Now. This is anecdotal, and anecdotal evidence says nothing useful for WP. But our article claims that "the historical use of this method has led to the use of coathangers as a symbol of the abortion rights movement," so I really feel that we should make certain that coat-hangers were actually at
705:
not a good analogy, considering murder needs motives (psychopathy, hate, jealousy etc) but in these girls I'm referring to they already have. the murder article doesn't report alternative ways of committing murder plus the ways of killing someone are pretty much known. (ways of getting away with it
1472:
It is so important to distinguish between approved regimens to self-induce or self-manage an abortion (misoprostol/mifepristone) and unsafe, unapproved methods in this section. I was thinking of adding a sentence after "Self-induced abortion methods vary around the world" along the lines of: There
947:
Who's the "we" ? Do you claim to speak on behalf of all women, or aborted women, or self induced abortees etc.. ? Knowledge has policies. Please study them before removing large chunks of referenced materials which you disagree with. Knowledge operates through consensus, and you don't have it. I'm
767:
Your authors have lectured nationwide on abortion on an average of one city a week for almost three decades. We frequently ask the audience to provide documented proof of a self-induced coat hanger abortion. In all this time no one has given us a single case. It may well be — there never were any
1552:
Hi all, new to wikipedia and this page - hoping to help update this article, as this topic is being searched more and more. In the current literature and conversations, it's more often referred to as a self-managed abortion. What do others think about including that term throughout the article
593: 974:
I believe that the heading of this article page, "Self-induced Abortion" should primarily focus on just that: how women can self-induce, without the potential and risk that women have been facing for countless millennia. But I see @Jim1138's point about the mentions of those methods that have
1189:
Specifically, clandestine abortion is that which is usually practiced out in countries were is penalized or illegal. The purpose is to hide its realization as well as the identity of the woman in order to avoid the penalties that may be imposed by the authorities. Clandestine abortion can be
1511:
I agree with the idea of distinguishing between methods. Rather than assigning value to them (such as "approved', under the "Methods attempted" section, I was thinking of one subheading of "Mifepristone and/or misoprostol" and another of "Physical trauma, herbs, and other substances". This
1005:
There is no potential criminal liability for providing accurately sourced information describing how other people have engaged in a medical act, just as there is no threat of an indictment for practicing medicine without a license for including such information in the article
990:
Your approach may turn out to be a waste of time and also criminal incitement in many jurisdictions where self induced abortions are illegal. If you don't get why the Fielding letter is important for retention in this article, you ought not to be editing in this area.
1043:
Also, speaking of "miscarriages", that word is significantly overused in this article at the moment. These methods to not ever produce miscarriages. They may produce "the death of the embryo/fetus/baby", and they may "end" or "terminate" the pregnancy, but the term
1568: 776:
some point by someone getting an abortion. I did a (very) quick Google and came up blank; can anyone do me a favor, find a documented example of a coat-hanger abortion, add the citation to the article, and prove these AbortionFacts people wrong? Much obliged. --
1223:
I rewrote the methods section to delete details of dangerous methods and anecdotal stories from doctors, instead replacing it with the World Health Organization protocols and a review of the current literature on self-induced abortion methods globally.
1360:? It is hardly the case that everyone in the world has access to abortion pills. As for the appearance of malice, your edits were followed by your accidental deletion of my talk page comment, which did lend to an unfortunate appearance of misbehavior. 1571:, and a Google search returns about three times as many hits for "self-induced abortion" as for "self-managed abortion". Google Scholar returns about nine times as many hits for "self-induced abortion" as for "self-managed abortion". 625:
Does anyone know what happened to the Gabriela Flores case? All sources on the web seem to be rehashings: she spent 4 months in jail and could face 2 more years in prison. By now it should be clear whether she was indeed convicted.
1425:
Yes, which is why I start the sentence in the methods section with: "The most commonly recorded are ingestion of plants or herbs, ingesting toxic substances, causing trauma to the uterus, causing physical trauma to the body..."
1639:"As a result, a diyya of approximately 1000 dinar is issued for the abortion of male fetuses and dinar for female ones, though the diyya is lowered to 60 dinar." This seems strange. Under what circumstances lowered, and why? 153: 1193:
The clandestine abortion not only causes the death of the fetus, but also causes serious organic injuries to the woman that often leaves her disabled to procreate in the future, and in other cases causes her
1682: 1640: 336: 545:"fairly common where abortion is illegal or unavailable, but it does occur in developed countries as well." This phrase seems to suggest that abortion is illegal only in undeveloped countries. 498: 1387:, I'm not suggesting that at all. Of course those methods are still used, just not as frequently as in past decades. At least that's what the science documents. A recent scoping review ( 596:, so anyone who comes searching for "coat hanger abortion" would greatly benefit from this redirect. My only regret about this article was that I didn't get an opportunity to vote 1274:
It looks like in restoring sourced content you actually removed far more sourced content than you restored. Could you elaborate on what was wrong with the other material, or can
147: 769: 1672: 578: 467: 326: 1677: 492: 1553:
and/or actually changing the title? I realize that may be quite bold for a new wikipedia editor but want to keep this article relevant. Thanks for your thoughts. --
1120: 1116: 1102: 1692: 429: 44: 927:
We do agree! Women must know that sharp-object and bleach abortions will kill them, and this is the place to be sure to impart this knowledge. /Lakshmi Singh
1667: 1198:
I have removed this for two reasons, first because it is unsourced, and second because it does not seem to be specific to abortions that are self-induced.
210:. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. 302: 79: 435: 1662: 1697: 1687: 415: 197: 707: 667: 293: 270: 85: 1040:, and the history section should note that when legal access to abortion became available, that the number of septic "miscarriages" dropped. 511: 849:
Very interesting. I'm not sure if this would be considered relevant to this article but here's another recent bit of news: Jane Sutton, "
754:
I just read a rather startling thing while doing some partisan research for an abortion debate I'm having with a friend. This is from a
391: 1644: 1098:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
168: 135: 666:?? srlsy LOL, i'm still laughing x]. i hope girls who are thinking of abortion (in any country) don't get ideas from this article 839: 805: 213: 201: 99: 30: 867:
My updates include new scientific information and research, new and updated sources, and advances in medicine. /Lakshmi Singh
382: 359: 104: 20: 1239:
I have reverted your deletion of sourced content. If you want to add content to the article, that's fine, but Knowledge is
640:
says that she was released on her own recognizance, and that there were five similar cases in the state from 2000 to 2004.
850: 74: 1163: 561: 245: 1088: 823: 129: 720:
Self-induced abortion is a well-reported scientific fact, and so it is reported here. Perhaps a better analogy is the
65: 526: 125: 711: 671: 1119:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1517: 1302: 1284: 175: 1356:
Are you suggesting that sharp objects, abdominal blows, douches, and other methods are no longer being used
1154: 1080: 219: 109: 1600: 1558: 1478: 1076: 1053: 996: 957: 781: 1431: 1396: 1347: 1294: 1240: 1229: 1138:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1126: 1072: 251: 24: 1079:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 1388: 882:
I disagree. The article, titled "self-induced abortion" should include the horrors of the coat hanger.
794: 589: 549: 506: 233: 1513: 1298: 1280: 908: 835: 801: 601: 161: 141: 55: 390:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
301:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1033: 70: 1405:
I would say, then, that it is inaccurate to describe methods still in use as merely historical.
1123:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1243:. We do not hide the fact that people use dangerous methods merely because they are dangerous. 1139: 637: 1596: 1554: 1474: 1049: 992: 980: 953: 935: 916: 890: 872: 777: 207: 51: 1619: 1581: 1501: 1427: 1415: 1392: 1370: 1343: 1325: 1275: 1253: 1225: 1208: 1020: 734: 695: 650: 614: 557: 1146: 1037: 298: 1105:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 831: 797: 627: 472: 421: 1145:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
285: 264: 1656: 681:
I would hope people contemplating murder don't get ideas from reading the article on
1089:
https://web.archive.org/web/20081217025152/http://big.berkeley.edu/ifplp.history.pdf
1007: 976: 931: 912: 902: 886: 868: 1648: 1624: 1610: 1604: 1586: 1572: 1562: 1521: 1506: 1492: 1482: 1435: 1420: 1406: 1400: 1382: 1375: 1361: 1351: 1337: 1330: 1316: 1306: 1288: 1269: 1258: 1244: 1233: 1213: 1199: 1168: 1112: 1057: 1025: 1011: 1000: 984: 961: 939: 920: 894: 876: 843: 809: 785: 739: 725: 715: 700: 686: 675: 655: 641: 630: 609: 565: 553: 907:
You need to discuss your intent to remove large amounts of content. Please get
1111:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 374: 353: 592:", because that's a very notable term, I've heard it discussed at length and 1092: 1512:
differentiates the types currently in use, whether they be legal or not. --
222:
when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
970:
Self-induced Abortion and the horrors of failed attempts at self-induction
387: 1595:
wow, learning so much already. self-induced abortion it is. thanks --
721: 682: 520: 487: 456: 851:
Florida man admits he tricked girlfriend into taking abortion drug
824:
An Idaho woman could change the course of American abortion law
451: 424:
in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
420:
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the
227: 184: 15: 724:
article, which describes the various ways the drug is taken.
685:, but that doesn't mean we fail to disclose the information. 465:
for Knowledge's health content are defined in the guideline
830:(December 21, 2012). On self-induced abortion these days. – 793:
Four+ years after the fact, but in case anyone is reading,
1083:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
948:
reverting back to an earlier stable version (apologies to
160: 1683:
Start-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
1178:
I have removed the following text from the article:
386:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 297:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 1115:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 512:
clinical publications about evidence-based medicine
579:Knowledge:Votes for deletion/Self-induced abortion 434:This article has not yet received a rating on the 1487:Approved by whom? Where the practice is illegal, 1048:is reserved for unintentional pregnancy losses. 706:is another more complicated section of it though) 468:Knowledge:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) 1569:Ngrams show no hits for "self-managed abortion" 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 1297:-- it may be good to migrate that here FWIW. -- 1180: 1101:This message was posted before February 2018. 174: 8: 1295:User_talk:DataNerdMPH#Self-induced_abortion 1071:I have just modified one external link on 348: 259: 1093:http://big.berkeley.edu/ifplp.history.pdf 493:review articles from the past five years 1641:2A00:23C5:FE1C:3701:8D7A:EB85:4078:96DB 350: 261: 231: 1673:Low-importance women's health articles 1174:"Clandestine abortion" section removed 763:But what about coat hanger abortions? 7: 1693:Unknown-importance Abortion articles 636:I've been able to find nothing new. 521:Centre for Reviews and Dissemination 380:This article is within the scope of 311:Knowledge:WikiProject Women's Health 291:This article is within the scope of 1678:WikiProject Women's Health articles 1293:Ah, I see discussion is ongoing at 952:) so we can discuss this properly. 314:Template:WikiProject Women's Health 250:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 1311:I merely returned the page to the 1032:I saw the request for comments at 796:was published earlier that year. – 422:project-independent quality rating 14: 1075:. Please take a moment to review 862:Deletion of the "Fielding" letter 518:Other potential sources include: 750:Historical coat-hanger abortions 455: 373: 352: 284: 263: 232: 188: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 1668:C-Class women's health articles 1609:Always bring evidence. Cheers! 331:This article has been rated as 212:Content must be written from a 196:The subject of this article is 1663:Knowledge controversial topics 588:I'm creating a redirect from " 400:Knowledge:WikiProject Abortion 1: 1698:WikiProject Abortion articles 1688:Start-Class Abortion articles 1649:16:01, 4 September 2024 (UTC) 1548:self-managed v. self-induced? 844:02:32, 29 December 2012 (UTC) 810:02:32, 29 December 2012 (UTC) 656:18:16, 25 February 2006 (UTC) 631:16:52, 25 February 2006 (UTC) 479:sources of information about 403:Template:WikiProject Abortion 394:and see a list of open tasks. 305:and see a list of open tasks. 42:Put new text under old text. 1279:unrelated to NOTCENSORED. -- 1058:05:28, 27 October 2017 (UTC) 1026:17:44, 20 October 2017 (UTC) 1001:17:14, 20 October 2017 (UTC) 985:19:47, 16 October 2017 (UTC) 962:17:05, 20 October 2017 (UTC) 940:19:51, 16 October 2017 (UTC) 921:18:53, 16 October 2017 (UTC) 895:18:38, 16 October 2017 (UTC) 877:18:32, 16 October 2017 (UTC) 786:22:35, 8 November 2008 (UTC) 740:14:45, 30 October 2008 (UTC) 716:07:08, 30 October 2008 (UTC) 701:03:34, 30 October 2008 (UTC) 676:00:36, 30 October 2008 (UTC) 566:09:36, 19 January 2009 (UTC) 1436:22:58, 27 August 2019 (UTC) 1421:21:28, 27 August 2019 (UTC) 1401:13:42, 27 August 2019 (UTC) 1376:12:40, 27 August 2019 (UTC) 1352:14:56, 26 August 2019 (UTC) 1331:21:07, 25 August 2019 (UTC) 1307:21:02, 25 August 2019 (UTC) 1289:20:55, 25 August 2019 (UTC) 1259:19:41, 25 August 2019 (UTC) 1234:15:47, 25 August 2019 (UTC) 1169:11:11, 2 January 2018 (UTC) 206:When updating the article, 50:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 1714: 1132:(last update: 5 June 2024) 1068:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 758:POV source, so here goes: 608:Thanks - good redirect! -- 436:project's importance scale 294:WikiProject Women's Health 1522:02:00, 14 July 2020 (UTC) 433: 419: 368: 330: 279: 258: 208:be bold, but not reckless 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 1625:05:12, 2 July 2020 (UTC) 1605:04:50, 2 July 2020 (UTC) 1587:01:23, 2 July 2020 (UTC) 1563:00:01, 2 July 2020 (UTC) 1507:01:17, 2 July 2020 (UTC) 1491:methods are unapproved. 1483:00:18, 2 July 2020 (UTC) 768:coat hanger abortions. 616:July 2, 2005 23:30 (UTC) 604:2 July 2005 22:08 (UTC) 1214:02:03, 8 May 2018 (UTC) 1064:External links modified 317:women's health articles 1196: 594:Google hits confirm it 240:This article is rated 200:and content may be in 75:avoid personal attacks 1073:Self-induced abortion 857:(September 10, 2013). 621:Gabriela Flores case? 481:Self-induced abortion 214:neutral point of view 100:Neutral point of view 25:Self-induced abortion 1184:Clandestine abortion 1113:regular verification 590:coat hanger abortion 541:Developed countries? 499:free review articles 475:. Here are links to 383:WikiProject Abortion 105:No original research 1103:After February 2018 1635:Reduction of diyya 1157:InternetArchiveBot 1108:InternetArchiveBot 471:and are typically 246:content assessment 86:dispute resolution 47: 1133: 911:before removing. 569: 552:comment added by 535: 534: 450: 449: 446: 445: 442: 441: 406:Abortion articles 347: 346: 343: 342: 226: 225: 183: 182: 66:Assume good faith 43: 1705: 1617: 1579: 1499: 1413: 1386: 1368: 1341: 1323: 1273: 1251: 1206: 1167: 1158: 1131: 1130: 1109: 1018: 906: 828:The New Republic 732: 693: 648: 612: 568: 546: 459: 452: 408: 407: 404: 401: 398: 377: 370: 369: 364: 356: 349: 337:importance scale 319: 318: 315: 312: 309: 288: 281: 280: 275: 267: 260: 243: 237: 236: 228: 192: 191: 185: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 16: 1713: 1712: 1708: 1707: 1706: 1704: 1703: 1702: 1653: 1652: 1637: 1611: 1573: 1550: 1493: 1407: 1380: 1362: 1335: 1317: 1313:status quo ante 1267: 1245: 1221: 1200: 1187: 1186: 1176: 1161: 1156: 1124: 1117:have permission 1107: 1081:this simple FaQ 1066: 1038:septic abortion 1012: 972: 900: 864: 820: 752: 726: 708:150.140.227.137 687: 668:150.140.227.137 664: 642: 623: 610: 586: 575: 547: 543: 477:possibly useful 473:review articles 405: 402: 399: 396: 395: 362: 316: 313: 310: 307: 306: 273: 244:on Knowledge's 241: 189: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 1711: 1709: 1701: 1700: 1695: 1690: 1685: 1680: 1675: 1670: 1665: 1655: 1654: 1636: 1633: 1632: 1631: 1630: 1629: 1628: 1627: 1590: 1589: 1549: 1546: 1545: 1544: 1543: 1542: 1541: 1540: 1539: 1538: 1537: 1536: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1531: 1530: 1529: 1528: 1527: 1526: 1525: 1524: 1514:Cervix service 1453: 1452: 1451: 1450: 1449: 1448: 1447: 1446: 1445: 1444: 1443: 1442: 1441: 1440: 1439: 1438: 1299:Ryan (Wiki Ed) 1291: 1281:Ryan (Wiki Ed) 1262: 1261: 1241:WP:NOTCENSORED 1220: 1217: 1185: 1182: 1181: 1175: 1172: 1151: 1150: 1143: 1096: 1095: 1087:Added archive 1065: 1062: 1061: 1060: 1041: 1030: 1029: 1028: 971: 968: 967: 966: 965: 964: 929: 928: 924: 923: 884: 883: 863: 860: 859: 858: 819: 816: 815: 814: 813: 812: 773: 772: 765: 751: 748: 747: 746: 745: 744: 743: 742: 663: 660: 659: 658: 622: 619: 618: 617: 602:CanadianCaesar 585: 582: 574: 571: 542: 539: 537: 533: 532: 531: 530: 516: 503: 484: 460: 448: 447: 444: 443: 440: 439: 432: 426: 425: 418: 412: 411: 409: 392:the discussion 378: 366: 365: 357: 345: 344: 341: 340: 333:Low-importance 329: 323: 322: 320: 308:Women's Health 303:the discussion 299:Women's Health 289: 277: 276: 274:Low‑importance 271:Women's Health 268: 256: 255: 249: 238: 224: 223: 193: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1710: 1699: 1696: 1694: 1691: 1689: 1686: 1684: 1681: 1679: 1676: 1674: 1671: 1669: 1666: 1664: 1661: 1660: 1658: 1651: 1650: 1646: 1642: 1634: 1626: 1623: 1622: 1618: 1616: 1615: 1608: 1607: 1606: 1602: 1598: 1594: 1593: 1592: 1591: 1588: 1585: 1584: 1580: 1578: 1577: 1570: 1567: 1566: 1565: 1564: 1560: 1556: 1547: 1523: 1519: 1515: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1505: 1504: 1500: 1498: 1497: 1490: 1486: 1485: 1484: 1480: 1476: 1471: 1470: 1469: 1468: 1467: 1466: 1465: 1464: 1463: 1462: 1461: 1460: 1459: 1458: 1457: 1456: 1455: 1454: 1437: 1433: 1429: 1424: 1423: 1422: 1419: 1418: 1414: 1412: 1411: 1404: 1403: 1402: 1398: 1394: 1390: 1384: 1379: 1378: 1377: 1374: 1373: 1369: 1367: 1366: 1359: 1355: 1354: 1353: 1349: 1345: 1339: 1334: 1333: 1332: 1329: 1328: 1324: 1322: 1321: 1314: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1304: 1300: 1296: 1292: 1290: 1286: 1282: 1277: 1271: 1266: 1265: 1264: 1263: 1260: 1257: 1256: 1252: 1250: 1249: 1242: 1238: 1237: 1236: 1235: 1231: 1227: 1218: 1216: 1215: 1212: 1211: 1207: 1205: 1204: 1195: 1191: 1183: 1179: 1173: 1171: 1170: 1165: 1160: 1159: 1148: 1144: 1141: 1137: 1136: 1135: 1128: 1122: 1118: 1114: 1110: 1104: 1099: 1094: 1090: 1086: 1085: 1084: 1082: 1078: 1074: 1069: 1063: 1059: 1055: 1051: 1047: 1042: 1039: 1035: 1031: 1027: 1024: 1023: 1019: 1017: 1016: 1009: 1004: 1003: 1002: 998: 994: 989: 988: 987: 986: 982: 978: 969: 963: 959: 955: 951: 946: 945: 944: 943: 942: 941: 937: 933: 926: 925: 922: 918: 914: 910: 904: 899: 898: 897: 896: 892: 888: 881: 880: 879: 878: 874: 870: 861: 856: 852: 848: 847: 846: 845: 841: 837: 833: 829: 825: 822:Ada Calhoun, 817: 811: 807: 803: 799: 795: 792: 791: 790: 789: 788: 787: 783: 779: 771: 766: 764: 761: 760: 759: 757: 749: 741: 738: 737: 733: 731: 730: 723: 719: 718: 717: 713: 709: 704: 703: 702: 699: 698: 694: 692: 691: 684: 680: 679: 678: 677: 673: 669: 661: 657: 654: 653: 649: 647: 646: 639: 635: 634: 633: 632: 629: 620: 615: 613: 607: 606: 605: 603: 599: 595: 591: 583: 581: 580: 572: 570: 567: 563: 559: 555: 551: 540: 538: 529: 528: 523: 522: 517: 514: 513: 508: 507:TRIP database 504: 501: 500: 495: 494: 489: 486: 485: 482: 478: 474: 470: 469: 464: 463:Ideal sources 461: 458: 454: 453: 437: 431: 428: 427: 423: 417: 414: 413: 410: 393: 389: 385: 384: 379: 376: 372: 371: 367: 361: 358: 355: 351: 338: 334: 328: 325: 324: 321: 304: 300: 296: 295: 290: 287: 283: 282: 278: 272: 269: 266: 262: 257: 253: 247: 239: 235: 230: 229: 221: 217: 215: 209: 205: 203: 199: 198:controversial 194: 187: 186: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 1638: 1620: 1613: 1612: 1597:Obgynhistory 1582: 1575: 1574: 1555:Obgynhistory 1551: 1502: 1495: 1494: 1488: 1475:Obgynhistory 1416: 1409: 1408: 1371: 1364: 1363: 1357: 1326: 1319: 1318: 1312: 1254: 1247: 1246: 1222: 1209: 1202: 1201: 1197: 1192: 1188: 1177: 1155: 1152: 1127:source check 1106: 1100: 1097: 1070: 1067: 1050:WhatamIdoing 1045: 1021: 1014: 1013: 1008:Appendectomy 993:MalluMalleus 973: 954:MalluMalleus 949: 930: 909:wp:consensus 885: 865: 854: 827: 821: 778:BCSWowbagger 774: 762: 755: 753: 735: 728: 727: 696: 689: 688: 665: 662:coat-hanger? 651: 644: 643: 638:this article 624: 597: 587: 576: 544: 536: 525: 519: 510: 497: 491: 480: 476: 466: 462: 381: 332: 292: 252:WikiProjects 211: 195: 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 1428:DataNerdMPH 1393:DataNerdMPH 1344:DataNerdMPH 1276:DataNerdMPH 1226:DataNerdMPH 1046:miscarriage 548:—Preceding 363:Start‑class 148:free images 31:not a forum 1657:Categories 1164:Report bug 818:New source 577:Resolved: 496:(limit to 1147:this tool 1140:this tool 832:Roscelese 798:Roscelese 628:AxelBoldt 509:provides 490:provides 220:citations 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 1153:Cheers.— 840:contribs 806:contribs 600:on it. 584:Redirect 562:contribs 550:unsigned 397:Abortion 388:Abortion 360:Abortion 218:Include 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 1219:Methods 1077:my edit 977:LPSingh 950:Jim1138 932:LPSingh 913:Jim1138 903:LPSingh 887:Jim1138 869:LPSingh 855:Reuters 335:on the 242:C-class 202:dispute 154:WP refs 142:scholar 1614:BD2412 1576:BD2412 1496:BD2412 1410:bd2412 1383:BD2412 1365:bd2412 1358:at all 1338:BD2412 1320:bd2412 1270:BD2412 1248:bd2412 1203:bd2412 1194:death. 1034:WT:MED 1015:bd2412 770:source 756:highly 729:bd2412 722:heroin 690:bd2412 683:murder 645:bd2412 611:BD2412 554:Mtanti 488:PubMed 248:scale. 126:Google 416:Start 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 1645:talk 1601:talk 1559:talk 1518:talk 1479:talk 1432:talk 1397:talk 1389:here 1348:talk 1303:talk 1285:talk 1230:talk 1054:talk 997:talk 981:talk 958:talk 936:talk 917:talk 891:talk 873:talk 836:talk 802:talk 782:talk 712:talk 672:talk 598:Keep 558:talk 524:and 505:The 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 1489:all 1121:RfC 1091:to 573:VfD 527:CDC 430:??? 327:Low 176:TWL 1659:: 1647:) 1603:) 1561:) 1520:) 1481:) 1434:) 1399:) 1350:) 1305:) 1287:) 1232:) 1134:. 1129:}} 1125:{{ 1056:) 1010:. 999:) 983:) 960:) 938:) 919:) 893:) 875:) 853:" 842:) 838:⋅ 826:, 808:) 804:⋅ 784:) 714:) 674:) 564:) 560:• 156:) 54:; 1643:( 1621:T 1599:( 1583:T 1557:( 1516:( 1503:T 1477:( 1430:( 1417:T 1395:( 1385:: 1381:@ 1372:T 1346:( 1340:: 1336:@ 1327:T 1301:( 1283:( 1272:: 1268:@ 1255:T 1228:( 1210:T 1166:) 1162:( 1149:. 1142:. 1052:( 1022:T 995:( 979:( 956:( 934:( 915:( 905:: 901:@ 889:( 871:( 834:( 800:( 780:( 736:T 710:( 697:T 670:( 652:T 556:( 515:. 502:) 483:. 438:. 339:. 254:: 216:. 204:. 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 58:.

Index

talk page
Self-induced abortion
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
controversial
dispute
be bold, but not reckless
neutral point of view
citations

content assessment

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.