353:
330:
316:
285:
261:
234:
224:
198:
184:
170:
138:
124:
384:
I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow folks to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns, and let me know one of those places when the issues have been addressed. If I may suggest that you strike out, check mark, or otherwise
371:
A bit more in the lead might be nice. I'd really expect a two paragraph lead for an article of this size and importance. A trick I find helpful is to put in at least one sentence from each large paragraph in the article. So I'd expect two sentences in the lead dealing with the background, one or two
380:
Otherwise a very nice article. Have you ever been to the battlefield? I have, and it really brings home to you how ... impressive the defensive lines were. (I have ancestors who fought on both sides at
385:
mark the items I've detailed, that will make it possible for me to see what's been addressed, and you can keep track of what's been done and what still needs to be worked on.
66:
62:
372:
from opposing forces, four or five for the assaults, three for siege, one for command changes, one for crater, one for surrender, one for legacy.
47:
102:
96:
39:
308:
190:
130:
156:
55:
17:
298:
390:
86:
32:
247:
322:
176:
386:
82:
393:
89:
74:
43:
8:
307:(images are tagged and non-free images have
375:Sixth paragraph of Siege needs a citation.
81:I'll be reviewing this article shortly.
7:
302:, where possible and appropriate.
203:one paragraph could use a citation
24:
351:
328:
314:
283:
259:
256:Fair representation without bias
232:
222:
196:
182:
168:
136:
122:
1:
394:15:15, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
90:14:43, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
352:
329:
315:
284:
260:
233:
223:
197:
183:
169:
137:
123:
410:
143:Lead could be a bit bigger
112:reasonably well written
18:Talk:Siege of Vicksburg
321:(appropriate use with
296:It is illustrated by
248:neutral point of view
212:broad in its coverage
309:fair use rationales
152:factually accurate
366:Specific concerns
323:suitable captions
280:No edit wars etc.
401:
355:
354:
332:
331:
318:
317:
287:
286:
263:
262:
236:
235:
226:
225:
200:
199:
186:
185:
177:reliable sources
172:
171:
140:
139:
126:
125:
79:
70:
51:
409:
408:
404:
403:
402:
400:
399:
398:
245:It follows the
219:(major aspects)
60:
37:
31:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
407:
405:
397:
396:
382:
377:
376:
373:
363:
362:
361:
360:
359:
358:
339:
338:
337:
336:
335:
294:
293:
292:
291:
290:
270:
269:
268:
267:
266:
243:
242:
241:
240:
239:
208:
207:
206:
205:
204:
175:(citations to
148:
147:
146:
145:
144:
107:
106:
80:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
406:
395:
392:
388:
383:
379:
378:
374:
370:
369:
368:
367:
357:
356:
349:
346:
345:
343:
340:
334:
333:
326:
324:
312:
310:
304:
303:
301:
300:
295:
289:
288:
281:
278:
277:
275:
271:
265:
264:
257:
254:
253:
251:
249:
244:
238:
237:
230:
220:
216:
215:
213:
209:
202:
201:
194:
192:
180:
178:
166:
162:
161:
159:
158:
153:
149:
142:
141:
134:
132:
120:
116:
115:
113:
109:
108:
105:for criteria)
104:
100:
98:
94:
93:
92:
91:
88:
84:
78:
77:
73:
68:
64:
59:
58:
54:
49:
45:
41:
36:
35:
26:
19:
365:
364:
347:
341:
320:
306:
297:
279:
273:
255:
246:
228:
218:
211:
188:
174:
165:(references)
164:
155:
151:
128:
118:
111:
95:
75:
71:
57:Article talk
56:
52:
33:
30:
381:Vicksburg).
44:visual edit
157:verifiable
348:Pass/Fail
229:(focused)
27:GA Review
387:Ealdgyth
83:Ealdgyth
342:Overall
119:(prose)
67:history
48:history
34:Article
299:images
274:stable
272:It is
250:policy
210:It is
150:It is
110:It is
99:review
101:(see
76:Watch
16:<
391:Talk
154:and
103:here
87:Talk
63:edit
40:edit
131:MoS
389:-
350::
344::
327::
319:b
313::
305:a
282::
276:.
258::
252:.
231::
227:b
221::
217:a
214:.
195::
191:OR
187:c
181::
173:b
167::
163:a
160:.
135::
127:b
121::
117:a
114:.
97:GA
85:-
65:|
46:|
42:|
325:)
311:)
193:)
189:(
179:)
133:)
129:(
72:·
69:)
61:(
53:·
50:)
38:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.