1345:
had done his duty gallantly throughout the siege. Next morning, early (16th July) there occurred the greatest loss which our defence had yet suffered, in the death of
Captain Strouts, commanding the detachment of Royal Marine Light Infantry. He was hit while walking in the Fu with Colonel Shiba and the "Times " correspondent, Dr. G. Morrison, and died within two or three hours from exhaustion, due to the loss of blood. It is impossible for me to adequately express my regret for his loss. Captain Strouts and Mr. Warren were buried at 6 o'clock in the evening, and just as the funeral procession was being formed, word was brought that a messenger with a white flag was advancing from the North Bridge towards the main gate of the Legation. As he came nearer, he was recognized as the old convert. His approach, which owing to his feebleness was very slow and deliberate, was accompanied by a succession of shells from a Krupp gun, most of which burst over the Legation. One exploded close to a group outside the gate, who were waving handkerchiefs to encourage him. He brought a letter to myself, and a telegram in cypher to the United States' Minister, transmitted through the Chinese Minister in Washington. The reply to this, a terse statement of our experiences, has been published. The tone and style of the communication to myself were different from that of the letter of the 14th. Our refusal to proceed to the Yamen was accepted without demur, and assurances given that the Legations would henceforth be properly protected. So great was the change in the tone of this letter that we suspected something to have happened in the outside world alarming to the Chinese Government. In this we were correct, for on the 11th July the native city of Tien-tsin had been taken, and probably an immediate advance on Peking was feared. There followed on the receipt of this letter a suspension of hostilities for several days. Some shells were fired the next morning, but they were the last until the closing days of the siege, and for ten or twelve days there was no heavy rifle firing. The Chinese troops showed themselves freely without arms on all their barricades, came forward to talk to our men, and explained that orders had now been received not to fire. This ready obedience to the orders to cease fire showed how completely under the control of the Government had been the previous attacks. We were far from reciprocating the confidence they showed in our good faith, aud were at much pains, both by verbal explanations and warning placards, to make clear to them that il they came too close they would be shot, but it was very difficult to restrain their curiosity to see more of our defences. There were noteworthy differences, however, between the troops on different sides of us, those to the north and west—all Kansuh men under Tung-fu-hsiang— remaining sullen and suspicious. From other directions, and especially on the east, where Jung Lu's troops were posted, it was possible to obtain supplies (small, but welcome) of eggs and vegetables, the sellers being smuggled through the Chinese soldiers' lines in spite of the prohibition of their officers, and it was from this side that the messengers came with all later letters. They declared, in fact, that they could not get through the troops on our western side without being shot. The truce, by whatever motives dictated, was very welcome, and we were anxious not to abbreviate it by any action of ours, but it was evidently regarded by the Chinese Government as likely to be but temporary, for on all sides the work of strengthening their barricades and gun-platforms proceeded.
1669:"Walking out in the morning, the German Minister saw one of the ordinary hooded Peking carts trotting carelessly along, with the mule all ears, because the carter was urging him along with many digs near the tail. But it was not the cart, nor the carter, nor yet the mule, which attracted His Excellency's immediate attention, but the passenger seated on the customary place of the off-shaft. For a moment Baron von K—— could not believe his eyes. It was nothing less than a full-fledged Boxer with his hair tied up in red cloth, red ribbons round his wrists and ankles, and a flaming red girdle tightening his loose white tunic; and, to cap all, the man was audaciously and calmly sharpening a big carver knife on his boots! It was sublime insolence, riding down Legation Street like this in the full glare of day, with a knife and regalia proclaiming the dawn of Boxerism in the Capital of Capitals, and withal, was a very ugly sign. What did K—— do—go home and invite some one to write a despatch for him to his government deprecating the growth of the Boxer movement, and the impossibility of carrying out conciliatory instructions, as some of his colleagues, including my own chief, would have done? Not a bit of it! He tilted full at the man with his walking stick, and before he could escape had beaten a regular roll of kettledrums on his hide. Then the Boxer, after a short struggle, abandoned his knife, and ran with some fleetness of foot into a neighbouring lane. The gallant German Minister raised the hue and cry, and then discovered yet another Boxer inside the cart, whom he duly secured by falling on top of him; and this last one was handed over to his own Legation Guards. The fugitive was followed into Prince Su's grounds, which run right through the Legation area, and there cornered in a house. The mysterious Dr. M—— then suddenly appeared on the scenes and insisted upon searching the Manchu Prince's entire grounds and most private apartments. But time was wasted in pourparlers, and in spite of a minute inspection, which extended even to the concubine apartments, the Boxer vanished in some mysterious way like a breath, and is even now untraced. This shows us conclusively that there are accomplices right in our midst."
394:
1051:"The Muslim Kansu braves and Boxers, along with other Chinese then attacked and killed Chinese Christians around the legations in revenge for foreign attacks on Chinese, the foreigners provoked the Chinese forces numerous times due to the rampant killing of Chinese labeled as "Boxers". "Â : so the Boxers were only killing in retaliation, because the killing of Chinese was 'rampant', and they were killing indiscriminately, innocent victims which they labeled as 'Boxers'. So the killing of Chinese Christians was well justified -- that's your message, isn't it?
571:
490:
561:
534:
378:
426:
506:
458:
64:
637:
442:
474:
263:
693:
113:
335:
324:
313:
1048:"thousands of Boxers burst into the walled city of Beijing ... The soldiers at the British Embassy and German Legations shot and killed several Boxers. The trigger-happy foreign soldiers alienated the Chinese population of the city..."Â : trigger-happy weren't they? Killed a few while under attack. And the entire population of Beijing was aroused? Is that a fact?
673:
410:
203:
144:
302:
291:
1340:
The old convert, of whose character the French
Fathers spoke disparagingly, showed not the slightest reluctance to take our reply, and it was surmised that he had secured a friendly reception from the enemy hy promising information as to our position and resources. He was sent out at noon on the 15th
1036:
Seems to me that a hierarcy of articles is needed. The first level is the article "Boxer
Rebellion" which should cover all the events in brief. The second level is articles about major sub-topics such as the Siege of the Beijing Legation Quarter, Battle of Beijing, Battle of Tianjin, etc. Then, a
1488:
Yes, the
Spanish, Belgians and also Dutch had representatives in the Legation quarter, but these were small trade offices compared to the others. The combined manpower of all three could not have been more than a dozen men at most. And their countries took not part of the Eight Nations Alliance and
1348:
So great was their activity in this direction as to give some ground for a suspicion that the truce was treacherously designed to enable these works to be carried out without danger from our fire—a suspicion strengthened by reports (since ascertained to have been correct) that mines were also being
1344:
There was much rifle fire on the afternoon of the 15th, and one of the
Student Interpreters of the Legation, Mr , Warren, was wounded at a loophole at a barricade in the Fu. It was doubtful at first whether his wound, though known to be serious, would prove fatal, but he died early in the night. He
1074:
Well, I wrote most of this article, but allow me to deny any responsibiity for the childish and misleading part of it. For example, in one paragraph we have the
Chinese army skillfully attacking foreigners and killing them in droves and in the next we learn that the whold Siege was a sham and that
894:
I have no problem with the merge of my article with this one. However, in the merging I lose all credit for the 99 percent of the merged article which is my work. Is there a remedy to this? Or do I swallow my (overly large) ego and accept that my contribution to the wisdom of the world was "writ
955:
It has to be specifically requested. The first step is to add "peer-review=yes" to the
Milhist banner above, then after saving it there will be a redlink to the peer review page. Click on that link and create the peer review page. From there it can be transcluded onto the Milhist peer review page,
1026:
The Battle of Peking in my opinon refers to the allied relief expedition (called in Wiki the "Eight Nation
Alliance") which marched from Tianjin to Beijing, defeated the Chinese army, and relieved the siege of the Legation Quarter. (Relief of Beijing might be a more accurate title that "Battle of
1101:
The Relief of the
Legations section first claims that "After many relatively quiet days, the night of August 13, ... may have been the most difficult of the siege." In the next paragraph, though, "The fighting and Chinese offensives became so severe from August 9–13 that the legations would have
1078:
I would, however, defend the trigger-happy characterization of the foreign soldiers (although the term "trigger-happy" is not appropriate). There's no doubt in my mind that the frequent incidents of foreigners shooting
Chinese indiscriminately -- in the pre-siege stage before the Legations were
1341:
by the sluice gate, followed, within an hour, by the man who had come in with him. It had been intended that they should be dispatched together, but, owing to a misunderstanding, this was not done, and the second man was fired at by the Chinese soldiers outside, with what effect is not known.
1139:
1673:
In short, Clemens von Ketteler came upon two boxers. One managed to run away, one was handed over to the German legation guards. No word on their ages or whether the prisoner was or was not executed. For this reason, I will remove the word "boy" and the phrase "and inexplicably executed him"
731:
This "article" is a complete and utter joke. Listen, my gook brothers and busy editors, we all know that where you live, "truth" is constructed at the whim of the party headquarters and plausibility is no concern at all. But please, don't try to export this cheap commodity ...
934:. That would hopefully elicit suggestions from other editors about what might need to be done to take it towards GA and above. If you wish to do this, just follow the link I've provided above and there are a list of steps. Anyway, keep up the good work. Cheers.
47:
856:
i would rather that this article be deleted, and the article 'Siege of the Legations, Beijing 1900' be retained. this article is very biased towards the Chinese perspective, while the latter article has an impartial look on the actual events....
497:
182:
513:
186:
1054:"Angry at the Chinese christians for collaborating with foreigners who were murdering Chinese, the muslims and Boxers roasted some of them alive."Â : well, it's understandable, they were angry at these collaborators, so they roasted them --
951:
Well, looking at the instructions for requesting a peer review I'm totally confused. Is there a regular review process by which articles will be evaluated? Or does one have to request a review? Smallchief 11:02, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
481:
433:
178:
166:
417:
401:
162:
158:
465:
449:
174:
170:
385:
154:
1075:
the Chinese were only setting off firecrackers. The internal contradictions in this article are many. I would edit out the objectionable parts, but I've done that before on related acticles and they just get reinserted.
791:
At the very least they need to be merged. Unfortunately I do not have enough knowledge about the subject to complete this task, so if anyone else out there would like to assist that would be appreciated.
1810:
1661:
The account of how Clemens von Ketteler spotted the first boxer, as cited in the article (Indiscreet Letters From Peking, ed. B. L. Putman Weale, New York 1907, p.50/51), can be found online, e.g.
1820:
1815:
1825:
1079:
under attack -- contributed to the hostilty of the Chinese. Especially prone to shooting Chinese was Baron Von Ketteler, the German diplomat, whose assassination may have been in retaliation.
1840:
1434:
Title The Boxer Catastrophe, by Chester C. Tan Author Chester C. Tan Editor Columbia university. Faculty of political science. . Publisher Columbia University Press, 1955 Length 284 pages
1057:
Not only is all this strongly and childishly biased, but it does in fact present no fact, no bit of information that could help understand the admittedly confusing situation at the time.
1709:
1800:
1770:
930:
No worries, happy to help where I can. Incidentally, the article seems like it has potential for a higher rating. If you are keen to continue working on it, I'd suggest requesting a
1805:
1775:
1760:
1750:
1790:
1780:
1765:
1755:
1795:
1785:
1740:
1745:
1017:
I believe this is a stand alone article and that the title is correct. The siege was of the Legation Quarter which was one small area of Peking (or Beijing, as you prefer).
1450:
1445:
276:
253:
215:
1294:
There is a lot of repetitive, emotional, and contradictory material in this article which I am attempting to remove or fix. Hopefully, my efforts will find approval.
1850:
651:
1835:
1735:
1605:
1601:
1587:
617:
243:
1855:
262:
1565:
1702:
1697:
1845:
1830:
1381:
Lipman, Jonathan N. (Jul., 1984). "Ethnicity and Politics in Republican China: The Ma Family Warlords of Gansu". Sage Publications, Inc. p. 296.
1268:
related articles. Put it this way, their books cover many important historical topics, and Yihetuan is just part of them. Discussion is open now.
970:
Done! (I think) My problem was I couldn't find the link. I'll be interested in how this process works. Smallchief 20:01, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
627:
210:
149:
1193:
Were they ever called "Muslim Kansu braves" or "Chinese Muslims"? If so, the new article ought to mention it, who called them that, and why. (
1037:
third level comes in with less important events such as "Battle of Yancun, Battle of Dagu Forts", etc. Smallchief 17:05, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
646:
544:
219:
1537:
774:
739:
1860:
1121:
There it says the British fought Chinese Muslims, whereas here it states they got in through an unguarded gate and continued unopposed.
778:
1451:
http://books.google.com/books?id=K-qdMZOS33oC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
1446:
http://books.google.com/books?id=RNANAAAAIAAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
1058:
717:
864:
705:
1349:
dug under different parts of our lines. Against these we took unremitting precautions in the shape of trenches and counter-mines,
593:
98:
76:
94:
90:
86:
82:
1142:
that says that the British were opposed by Muslim troops during the relief of the legations, so thats the one that is correct.
1356:
1371:
1264:, and their books cover 10 to 70 years of Manchu Empire history, and yet, none of their books were being cited in all the
1366:
1316:
1313:
1717:
1361:
124:
679:
584:
539:
1566:
https://web.archive.org/20120512123211/http://seeingredinchina.com/2011/09/15/the-partys-narrative-of-chinas-history/
899:
I've added the merge to/from tag above, which links to the other article's history. Not sure if this helps, though.
961:
939:
904:
811:
758:
article origionally featured a description of the siege (and will again) so this article should not be necessary.--
592:
related articles on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1005:
763:
1569:
996:
This article should be renamed the "Siege of Peking" because that is the name most commonly used and perhaps the
1604:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1693:
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:
1473:
Weren't the Spanish and Belgian legations also under attack? Did they legation guards engaged in the defence?
743:
393:
1713:
1062:
782:
214:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
1102:
fallen if the relief force had not arrived." Does this mean the Chinese attacked on tiptoe on August 9-12?
1494:
1489:
relief force in any case. If you can find a source with accurate numbers then it may be worth mentioning.
1126:
1107:
918:
884:
797:
489:
1643:
1623:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1611:
1280:
1234:
1183:
957:
948:
Thanks, I'll do that. A new Wiki experience! I'm getting addicted. ("Get a life," says the Memsahib)
935:
900:
868:
807:
130:
1147:
895:
in water" -- as a fellow named John Keats said of his poems? Smallchief 21:51, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
1001:
777:, about seemingly the same event. That was created after this one was created... but is poorly named.
759:
63:
1299:
1084:
1000:
article (which refers to the relief) should be merged with this article. It was all one engagement.--
860:
735:
1721:
1683:
1651:
1520:
1498:
1482:
1463:
1329:
1303:
1284:
1238:
1204:
1187:
1151:
1130:
1111:
1088:
1066:
1009:
965:
943:
922:
908:
888:
872:
844:
815:
801:
786:
767:
747:
112:
1257:
1143:
720:
for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.
1382:
1608:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1261:
672:
1624:
1253:
1547:
1490:
1459:
1393:
1325:
1122:
1103:
914:
880:
840:
793:
560:
533:
1639:
1273:
1227:
1218:
times, all different troops with different name were recruited into a new army, that is the
1176:
997:
755:
377:
1631:
1555:
1516:
1478:
1418:
1406:
1295:
1215:
1201:
1080:
1357:
http://books.google.com/books?id=ds85AQAAIAAJ&pg=RA2-PA30#v=onepage&q&f=false
1167:
Muslim Kansu braves, Chinese Muslims, these are not official name. The official name is
1679:
1590:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
1372:
http://books.google.com/books?id=rJgAAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA1246#v=onepage&q&f=false
1265:
931:
425:
1630:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1367:
http://books.google.com/books?id=R5tPAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA137#v=onepage&q&f=false
1317:
http://books.google.com/books?id=H7gRAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA657#v=onepage&q&f=false
1314:
http://books.google.com/books?id=-YoxAQAAMAAJ&pg=PA657#v=onepage&q&f=false
1214:
Muslim Kansus braves and Chinese Muslims, both of them are not official names, during
1729:
1689:
Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion
1362:
http://books.google.com/books?id=3F4LAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA30#v=onepage&q&f=false
1455:
1321:
836:
806:
I agree, these two articles should be merged and then one redirected to the other.
576:
505:
1597:
1429:
1249:
1219:
1168:
636:
457:
1596:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
1570:
http://seeingredinchina.com/2011/09/15/the-partys-narrative-of-chinas-history/
1512:
1474:
1353:
Papers by Command, Volume 105 By Great Britain. Parliament. House of Commons
1194:
566:
927:
Thanks. I appreciate your kindness. Smallchief 02:29, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
1675:
441:
70:
473:
1662:
1552:
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add
1385:
409:
202:
143:
1560:
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
1508:
589:
835:. Please try to find a knowledgeable editor who can help.--
687:
667:
106:
1222:, that is the official name, why should other names be used?
1575:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
1309:
False reports of massacre of foreigners in the western press
635:
504:
488:
472:
456:
440:
424:
408:
392:
376:
261:
1256:, scholar, historian and writer of university text books,
1536:
I have just added archive links to one external link on
1541:
1171:, editors should use official name to avoid confusion.
713:
709:
700:
40:
69:
Facts from this article were featured on Knowledge's
1811:
Start-Class North American military history articles
588:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
274:
This article has been checked against the following
1821:
Start-Class United States military history articles
1816:
North American military history task force articles
1600:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
1507:Was there a Portuguese presence? They were holding
359:
273:
1826:United States military history task force articles
1841:C-Class China-related articles of Mid-importance
1338:
1801:Start-Class Japanese military history articles
1771:Start-Class European military history articles
1708:Participate in the deletion discussion at the
1586:This message was posted before February 2018.
1252:, scholar, historian and university lecturer,
1117:Disagreement with the Battle of Peking article
1806:Japanese military history task force articles
1776:European military history task force articles
1761:Start-Class Chinese military history articles
1751:Start-Class British military history articles
1430:http://books.google.com/books?id=eSiGQwAACAAJ
956:where editors will review and make comments.
8:
1791:Start-Class German military history articles
1781:Start-Class French military history articles
1766:Chinese military history task force articles
1756:British military history task force articles
913:Thanks mate, you learn something every day.
1796:German military history task force articles
1786:French military history task force articles
1741:Start-Class Asian military history articles
1442:put on wikisource and link to this article
1746:Asian military history task force articles
691:
528:
498:North American military history task force
356:
270:
138:
19:
15:
1335:Conduct during the siege of the legations
1163:Consensus seeking to use of official name
514:United States military history task force
1044:Stop adding this kind of non-information
698:Text and/or other creative content from
208:This article is within the scope of the
1851:Mid-importance Chinese history articles
530:
140:
110:
1414:
1402:
1391:
228:Knowledge:WikiProject Military history
218:. To use this banner, please see the
1836:Mid-importance China-related articles
1736:Start-Class military history articles
1703:BoxerRevolutionarybyGeorgeSStuart.jpg
1698:BaronRongluJung-LubyGeorgeSStuart.jpg
231:Template:WikiProject Military history
7:
1856:WikiProject Chinese history articles
1538:Siege of the International Legations
775:Siege of the Legations, Beijing 1900
754:This article should be deleted, the
701:Siege of the Legations, Beijing 1900
582:This article is within the scope of
482:Japanese military history task force
434:European military history task force
418:Chinese military history task force
402:British military history task force
129:It is of interest to the following
879:The merge has been completed now.
466:German military history task force
450:French military history task force
14:
1540:. Please take a moment to review
706:Siege of Beijing Legation Quarter
386:Asian military history task force
1846:C-Class Chinese history articles
1138:Battle of Peking actually has a
773:There is a new large article at
671:
569:
559:
532:
333:
322:
311:
300:
289:
201:
142:
111:
62:
622:This article has been rated as
248:This article has been rated as
1831:C-Class China-related articles
1722:19:43, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
1684:00:42, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
1438:Primary sources for wikisource
768:21:34, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
1:
1330:22:26, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
1010:01:09, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
644:This article is supported by
596:and see a list of open tasks.
1652:20:39, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
1499:06:40, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
1483:21:38, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
1464:06:06, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
1260:, history books writer, and
1089:14:06, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
1067:00:33, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
966:11:46, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
944:06:33, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
923:20:23, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
909:10:43, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
889:20:23, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
873:15:46, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
845:09:56, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
816:02:57, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
802:01:30, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
787:05:44, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
211:Military history WikiProject
647:WikiProject Chinese history
602:Knowledge:WikiProject China
1877:
1861:WikiProject China articles
1617:(last update: 5 June 2024)
1558:|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
1533:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
1304:11:03, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
1152:19:16, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
1131:21:53, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
1112:21:50, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
628:project's importance scale
605:Template:WikiProject China
294:Referencing and citation:
1521:01:48, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
1285:03:26, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
1239:16:02, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
1205:15:21, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
1188:08:20, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
748:21:42, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
704:was copied or moved into
682:by an editor in the past.
643:
621:
554:
512:
496:
480:
464:
448:
432:
416:
400:
384:
355:
247:
234:military history articles
196:
137:
22:
18:
1529:External links modified
360:Associated task forces:
305:Coverage and accuracy:
48:WikiProject peer review
1401:Check date values in:
1351:
640:
608:China-related articles
509:
493:
477:
461:
445:
429:
413:
397:
381:
338:Supporting materials:
266:
119:This article is rated
680:proposed for deletion
639:
508:
492:
476:
460:
444:
428:
412:
396:
380:
265:
1665:or on archive.org.
1657:First boxer captured
1598:regular verification
1583:to let others know.
1544:. If necessary, add
712:. The former page's
1588:After February 2018
1579:parameter below to
718:provide attribution
327:Grammar and style:
280:for B-class status:
1714:Community Tech bot
1593:InternetArchiveBot
1469:Spanish? Belgians?
1290:Shortening article
992:Rename and merging
641:
510:
494:
478:
462:
446:
430:
414:
398:
382:
267:
216:list of open tasks
125:content assessment
23:Article milestones
1650:
1618:
1413:Missing or empty
1279:
1233:
1182:
863:comment added by
738:comment added by
724:
723:
686:
685:
666:
665:
662:
661:
658:
657:
585:WikiProject China
527:
526:
523:
522:
519:
518:
351:
350:
307:criterion not met
296:criterion not met
252:on the project's
220:full instructions
105:
104:
57:
56:
41:November 28, 2010
1868:
1646:
1645:Talk to my owner
1641:
1616:
1615:
1594:
1559:
1551:
1422:
1416:
1410:
1404:
1399:
1397:
1389:
1278:
1276:
1271:
1245:Historical books
1232:
1230:
1225:
1199:
1181:
1179:
1174:
1169:Wuwei Rear Troop
1002:$ 1LENCE D00600D
998:Battle of Peking
958:AustralianRupert
936:AustralianRupert
901:AustralianRupert
875:
808:AustralianRupert
760:$ 1LENCE D00600D
756:Battle of Peking
750:
703:
695:
694:
688:
675:
668:
610:
609:
606:
603:
600:
579:
574:
573:
572:
563:
556:
555:
550:
547:
536:
529:
367:
357:
341:
337:
336:
330:
326:
325:
319:
315:
314:
308:
304:
303:
297:
293:
292:
271:
236:
235:
232:
229:
226:
225:Military history
205:
198:
197:
192:
189:
150:Military history
146:
139:
122:
116:
115:
107:
66:
43:
20:
16:
1876:
1875:
1871:
1870:
1869:
1867:
1866:
1865:
1726:
1725:
1710:nomination page
1691:
1659:
1649:
1644:
1609:
1602:have permission
1592:
1553:
1545:
1531:
1471:
1440:
1412:
1400:
1390:
1380:
1337:
1311:
1292:
1274:
1272:
1247:
1228:
1226:
1216:Boxer Rebellion
1195:
1177:
1175:
1165:
1119:
1099:
1046:
994:
858:
733:
729:
699:
692:
607:
604:
601:
598:
597:
575:
570:
568:
548:
542:
365:
339:
334:
328:
323:
317:
312:
306:
301:
295:
290:
233:
230:
227:
224:
223:
190:
152:
123:on Knowledge's
120:
39:
12:
11:
5:
1874:
1872:
1864:
1863:
1858:
1853:
1848:
1843:
1838:
1833:
1828:
1823:
1818:
1813:
1808:
1803:
1798:
1793:
1788:
1783:
1778:
1773:
1768:
1763:
1758:
1753:
1748:
1743:
1738:
1728:
1727:
1706:
1705:
1700:
1690:
1687:
1671:
1670:
1658:
1655:
1642:
1636:
1635:
1628:
1573:
1572:
1564:Added archive
1530:
1527:
1526:
1525:
1524:
1523:
1502:
1501:
1470:
1467:
1439:
1436:
1424:
1423:
1336:
1333:
1310:
1307:
1291:
1288:
1266:Boxer Protocol
1246:
1243:
1242:
1241:
1210:
1208:
1207:
1164:
1161:
1159:
1157:
1156:
1155:
1154:
1118:
1115:
1098:
1095:
1094:
1093:
1092:
1091:
1076:
1045:
1042:
1041:
1040:
1039:
1038:
1031:
1030:
1029:
1028:
1021:
1020:
1019:
1018:
993:
990:
988:
986:
985:
984:
983:
982:
981:
980:
979:
978:
977:
976:
975:
974:
973:
972:
971:
892:
891:
854:
853:
852:
851:
850:
849:
848:
847:
823:
822:
821:
820:
819:
818:
753:
740:84.112.145.198
728:
725:
722:
721:
716:now serves to
696:
684:
683:
678:This page was
676:
664:
663:
660:
659:
656:
655:
652:Mid-importance
642:
632:
631:
624:Mid-importance
620:
614:
613:
611:
594:the discussion
581:
580:
564:
552:
551:
549:Mid‑importance
537:
525:
524:
521:
520:
517:
516:
511:
501:
500:
495:
485:
484:
479:
469:
468:
463:
453:
452:
447:
437:
436:
431:
421:
420:
415:
405:
404:
399:
389:
388:
383:
373:
372:
370:
368:
362:
361:
353:
352:
349:
348:
346:
344:
343:
342:
331:
320:
309:
298:
284:
283:
281:
268:
258:
257:
246:
240:
239:
237:
206:
194:
193:
147:
135:
134:
128:
117:
103:
102:
77:On this day...
67:
59:
58:
55:
54:
51:
44:
36:
35:
32:
29:
25:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1873:
1862:
1859:
1857:
1854:
1852:
1849:
1847:
1844:
1842:
1839:
1837:
1834:
1832:
1829:
1827:
1824:
1822:
1819:
1817:
1814:
1812:
1809:
1807:
1804:
1802:
1799:
1797:
1794:
1792:
1789:
1787:
1784:
1782:
1779:
1777:
1774:
1772:
1769:
1767:
1764:
1762:
1759:
1757:
1754:
1752:
1749:
1747:
1744:
1742:
1739:
1737:
1734:
1733:
1731:
1724:
1723:
1719:
1715:
1711:
1704:
1701:
1699:
1696:
1695:
1694:
1688:
1686:
1685:
1681:
1677:
1668:
1667:
1666:
1664:
1656:
1654:
1653:
1647:
1640:
1633:
1629:
1626:
1622:
1621:
1620:
1613:
1607:
1603:
1599:
1595:
1589:
1584:
1582:
1578:
1571:
1567:
1563:
1562:
1561:
1557:
1549:
1543:
1539:
1534:
1528:
1522:
1518:
1514:
1510:
1506:
1505:
1504:
1503:
1500:
1496:
1492:
1487:
1486:
1485:
1484:
1480:
1476:
1468:
1466:
1465:
1461:
1457:
1453:
1452:
1448:
1447:
1443:
1437:
1435:
1432:
1431:
1427:
1420:
1408:
1395:
1387:
1384:
1379:
1378:
1377:
1374:
1373:
1369:
1368:
1364:
1363:
1359:
1358:
1354:
1350:
1346:
1342:
1334:
1332:
1331:
1327:
1323:
1319:
1318:
1315:
1308:
1306:
1305:
1301:
1297:
1289:
1287:
1286:
1283:
1282:
1281:
1277:
1267:
1263:
1259:
1255:
1251:
1244:
1240:
1237:
1236:
1235:
1231:
1221:
1217:
1213:
1212:
1211:
1206:
1202:
1200:
1198:
1192:
1191:
1190:
1189:
1186:
1185:
1184:
1180:
1170:
1162:
1160:
1153:
1149:
1145:
1141:
1137:
1136:
1135:
1134:
1133:
1132:
1128:
1124:
1116:
1114:
1113:
1109:
1105:
1097:Contradiction
1096:
1090:
1086:
1082:
1077:
1073:
1072:
1071:
1070:
1069:
1068:
1064:
1060:
1055:
1052:
1049:
1043:
1035:
1034:
1033:
1032:
1025:
1024:
1023:
1022:
1016:
1015:
1014:
1013:
1012:
1011:
1007:
1003:
999:
991:
989:
969:
968:
967:
963:
959:
954:
953:
950:
949:
947:
946:
945:
941:
937:
933:
929:
928:
926:
925:
924:
920:
916:
912:
911:
910:
906:
902:
898:
897:
896:
890:
886:
882:
878:
877:
876:
874:
870:
866:
862:
846:
842:
838:
834:
833:Support merge
831:
830:
829:
828:
827:
826:
825:
824:
817:
813:
809:
805:
804:
803:
799:
795:
790:
789:
788:
784:
780:
779:76.66.199.238
776:
772:
771:
770:
769:
765:
761:
757:
751:
749:
745:
741:
737:
726:
719:
715:
711:
707:
702:
697:
690:
689:
681:
677:
674:
670:
669:
653:
650:(assessed as
649:
648:
638:
634:
633:
629:
625:
619:
616:
615:
612:
595:
591:
587:
586:
578:
567:
565:
562:
558:
557:
553:
546:
541:
538:
535:
531:
515:
507:
503:
502:
499:
491:
487:
486:
483:
475:
471:
470:
467:
459:
455:
454:
451:
443:
439:
438:
435:
427:
423:
422:
419:
411:
407:
406:
403:
395:
391:
390:
387:
379:
375:
374:
371:
369:
364:
363:
358:
354:
347:
345:
340:criterion met
332:
329:criterion met
321:
318:criterion met
310:
299:
288:
287:
286:
285:
282:
279:
278:
272:
269:
264:
260:
259:
255:
254:quality scale
251:
245:
242:
241:
238:
221:
217:
213:
212:
207:
204:
200:
199:
195:
188:
187:United States
184:
183:North America
180:
176:
172:
168:
164:
160:
156:
151:
148:
145:
141:
136:
132:
126:
118:
114:
109:
108:
100:
99:June 20, 2023
96:
95:June 20, 2020
92:
91:June 20, 2016
88:
87:June 20, 2013
84:
83:June 20, 2011
80:
78:
72:
68:
65:
61:
60:
52:
50:
49:
45:
42:
38:
37:
33:
30:
27:
26:
21:
17:
1707:
1692:
1672:
1660:
1637:
1612:source check
1591:
1585:
1580:
1576:
1574:
1535:
1532:
1491:Mediatech492
1472:
1454:
1449:
1444:
1441:
1433:
1428:
1425:
1375:
1370:
1365:
1360:
1355:
1352:
1347:
1343:
1339:
1320:
1312:
1293:
1270:
1269:
1258:Wang Shuzhen
1248:
1224:
1223:
1209:
1196:
1173:
1172:
1166:
1158:
1123:Clarityfiend
1120:
1104:Clarityfiend
1100:
1059:81.57.148.99
1056:
1053:
1050:
1047:
995:
987:
915:Anotherclown
893:
881:Anotherclown
855:
832:
794:Anotherclown
752:
734:— Preceding
730:
645:
623:
583:
577:China portal
275:
249:
209:
131:WikiProjects
74:
46:
1250:Tong Tekong
1220:Wuwei Troop
932:peer review
865:121.54.96.4
859:—Preceding
316:Structure:
250:Start-class
191:Start‑class
1730:Categories
1296:Smallchief
1262:Jin Manluo
1081:Smallchief
81:column on
1632:this tool
1625:this tool
1426:Page 114
1376:Page 296
1275:Arilang
1254:Hou Yijie
1229:Arilang
1178:Arilang
1027:Beijing."
710:this edit
71:Main Page
1638:Cheers.—
1548:cbignore
1394:cite web
861:unsigned
736:unsigned
727:Deletion
277:criteria
179:Japanese
167:European
53:Reviewed
1648::Online
1577:checked
1542:my edit
1456:Rajmaan
1322:Rajmaan
1144:ΔΥΝΓΑΝΕ
837:Kudpung
714:history
626:on the
545:History
163:Chinese
159:British
121:C-class
73:in the
31:Process
1556:nobots
1403:|date=
1386:189017
1140:source
175:German
171:French
127:scale.
97:, and
34:Result
1513:Error
1509:Macau
1475:FOARP
1415:|url=
1383:JSTOR
1197:Hohum
708:with
599:China
590:China
540:China
244:Start
155:Asian
1718:talk
1680:talk
1676:Yaan
1663:here
1581:true
1517:talk
1511:. --
1495:talk
1479:talk
1460:talk
1419:help
1407:help
1326:talk
1300:talk
1148:talk
1127:talk
1108:talk
1085:talk
1063:talk
1006:talk
962:talk
940:talk
919:talk
905:talk
885:talk
869:talk
841:talk
812:talk
798:talk
783:talk
764:talk
744:talk
28:Date
1712:. —
1606:RfC
1568:to
618:Mid
1732::
1720:)
1682:)
1619:.
1614:}}
1610:{{
1554:{{
1550:}}
1546:{{
1519:)
1497:)
1481:)
1462:)
1411:;
1398::
1396:}}
1392:{{
1328:)
1302:)
1203:)
1150:)
1129:)
1110:)
1087:)
1065:)
1008:)
964:)
942:)
921:)
907:)
887:)
871:)
843:)
814:)
800:)
785:)
766:)
746:)
654:).
543::
366:/
185:/
181:/
177:/
173:/
169:/
165:/
161:/
157:/
153::
93:,
89:,
85:,
1716:(
1678:(
1634:.
1627:.
1515:(
1493:(
1477:(
1458:(
1421:)
1417:(
1409:)
1405:(
1388:.
1324:(
1298:(
1146:(
1125:(
1106:(
1083:(
1061:(
1004:(
960:(
938:(
917:(
903:(
883:(
867:(
839:(
810:(
796:(
781:(
762:(
742:(
630:.
256:.
222:.
133::
101:.
79:"
75:"
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
