Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:Star Awards

Source 📝

836:, I had already left a warning on your talk page in concerned of disruptive editing, and it may causing vandalism to the Star Awards Articles as well. Also, your suggestion here has been read, I have nothing to do with those changes because I'm not the one who create various colours in the table for different ceremonies. Secondly, where there is the nomination lists beside artistes names there should be chinese characters beside, because this is a Chinese televsied ceremony and it has nothing to do with bilingual, English is just for others who do not understand chinese. Finally, Star Awards 2023 has a different arrangement from the organizers, which had its own separated ceremony prior to the event, so there is nothing to do with the orders with the presenters as well. If you have further concern, please ask further with the event organizer, Thanks. ( 229: 283: 262: 293: 220: 464: 388: 367: 773:. It is rather explicit. As for consistency of having Chinese characters besides the names, in my opinion, we can safely remove most, if not all of the Chinese characters from the artistes' names, and even the television shows if it can be shown that these people and shows have been reported with their English names in the English media. 814:. The Academy Awards have the Governors Awards which is presented during the ceremony but is not one of the Academy Awards and hence should have their own sub sections. The only equivalent awards for Start Awards is the sponsored awards but as I am fine with this being in a standalone or merged section. 858:
You have templated me with a warning without any discussion and acting against a guideline. Yes, it has nothing with bilingual, English Knowledge (XXG) serves the English audience, if they do not understand Chinese, they would not have understand the Chinese characters as well so providing them with
1053:
I had already explained, if you so called "flow" which does not include Chinese characters, well as I know Knowledge (XXG) has a lot of articles which is not trustable because which is done by humans. Some of the Knowledge (XXG) guidelines might by wrong as well. As here I will stop chatting, I did
636:
I have already accepted some of the in text changes but the nomination for popularity awards which some of the artistes name has Chinese characters and some of it are not it does not fit well in the MOS as well, did MOS told anything that we should or should not put Chinese characters besides the
817:
In terms of the differing formats for Star Awards over the years but the format of the articles is the same. Multiple ceremonies means multiple sub sections for Ceremony Information. Order of awards should either follow order of presentation or follow how the organiser presented the information.
919:
is precisely why I chose to discuss here. If there is no discussion here, there will be edit wars on the pages. I did a bold change in accordance to Knowledge (XXG)'s guidelines, you reverted against Knowledge (XXG)'s guideline and then demanded here that I go change it myself. This is rather
931:
and the discussion is focused on your unsourced contents which robertsky had spent a long time explaining to you and also our discussion in merging trivia into ceremony information which I assumed you accepted or ignored based on the lack of discussion or changes to my update to the article.
1020:
If the flow is wrong, do we fix it or just let it continue? Also your so called "flow" is against the main flow of Knowledge (XXG), against Knowledge (XXG)'s guidelines. Your flow is wrong with the standards set by the community and I quote
881:,some of the ceremonies are one of a kind or different with others, If you "personally" prefer order of presentation, why not you help to change? Please help to change the whole article if you think that your idea is more reliable. ( 1273: 699:, it is acceptable to allow Chinese characters to remain if there are are no articles for the English term (or person in our case now). If you wish to propose a wholesale removal of all Chinese characters, I am agreeable with it. 744:
This is not about is this an English, Chinese or whatever language event or not. This is an English writeup on an event. Inclusion of chinese characters on this English article is guided by the Chinese characters guidelines.
233: 1263: 153: 805:
section. It is fine to have a sub section called popularity awards with all the various popularity-type awards. My personal choice is either you have all the subsections for the different categories like
702:
Also, there are many Knowledge (XXG) articles (beside the Star Awards article, there are also many biography articles which do not keep to the guidelines) which do not follow the guidelines and I am on a
442: 349: 1278: 1054:
not revert back your changes, let's just ask for everyone's opinion. Also, Star Awards' Article is less important article, I don't think we should take good care much on this unhealthy fight. (
950:
The removal is done by you, I just reverted to have all the Chinese characters displayed to match with previous year Ceremony. You are the one who did not wanted to acept my explanation. (
605:. A local consensus (i.e. between just us and any of the interested Star Awards editors) established here that contradicts the MOS is generally not acceptable by the wider community (see: 707:
journey to help getting them to conform to it. This is why I started this section to request editors not to include the Chinese Characters in the first place so we do not have to fix it.
147: 474: 79: 1258: 1288: 1107:
I noted that some Star Awards articles have some tables with very different colour scheme. Please choose and standardise the colour scheme which follows
339: 85: 1303: 1293: 1268: 432: 315: 1112: 1070: 501:
To help establish a simple and clean appearance, if a term is Wikified and has an article, do not provide characters or romanization again.
30: 1190:
You are firmly editing on demand of yourself, Star Awards article had been bilingual every year in the past, those changes you've made in
408: 1283: 641:, please check previous Star Awards' articles which it had already have Chinese characters beside artiste names, not in favour of MOS. ( 44: 1134:, those colors represents the title card of the table of different ceremonies, if you wanted to standardize it, please help to do so. ( 601:). If you would like these conventions to remain, the discussion has to be thrown open to the general Knowledge (XXG) community via a 306: 267: 99: 1226: 1158: 1120: 1030: 986: 937: 864: 823: 750: 712: 572: 527: 508: 104: 20: 1298: 74: 1253: 395: 372: 242: 1153:
Since you are rather adamant in going against Knowledge (XXG)'s guidelines, asking me to help set a standard is not helping.
1214: 1022: 974: 928: 770: 696: 496: 65: 168: 1222: 1187: 1168: 1154: 1131: 1116: 1026: 996: 982: 947: 933: 878: 860: 833: 819: 746: 722: 708: 657: 627: 590: 568: 559:, this is not remain as usual with all the articles. This is against Knowledge (XXG)'s guidelines and can be considered 537: 523: 504: 135: 470: 807: 190: 185: 109: 969:
Your explanation is against the guideline, my edit summary included the guideline and explanation. You insisted
199: 1308: 769:
To your first question: I suggest that you read and understand the specific section as linked in the shortcut
248: 129: 1199: 1176: 1139: 1059: 1006: 955: 901: 886: 841: 730: 681: 646: 545: 560: 55: 585:
The localised conventions (i.e. whatever we have had on the series of Star Awards page) contravenes the
407:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
314:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
125: 70: 598: 463: 219: 1078: 811: 778: 725:, talking back, this is not English event so by putting Chinese text is appropriate and suitable. ( 617: 175: 161: 1210: 1195: 1172: 1150: 1135: 1055: 1017: 1002: 966: 951: 912: 897: 882: 855: 837: 766: 741: 726: 692: 677: 642: 582: 556: 541: 519: 204: 51: 1218: 1191: 916: 673: 669: 665: 661: 637:
artiste? This is Innapropriate to have few Chinese characters displayed and a few doesn't. @
298: 201: 602: 586: 564: 1040: 141: 896:
Popularity Awards is Popularity Awards, there is nothing to do with Judged Categories. (
1074: 1048: 774: 638: 631: 613: 1247: 676:, there are Chinese characters beside artistes names which had not cause conflict. ( 970: 500: 1044: 594: 522:, on the usage of Chinese characters besides wikified BLP and articles. Thanks. 282: 261: 24: 606: 1194:
is inappropriate, with only a few of artiste with Chinese characters beside. (
288: 1108: 311: 1217:, the discussion is here for some time and as there is no response, I went 1001:
As I said, you are firmly did not accept the flow of Star Awards Article. (
503:
Please remove the chinese characters of the artistes' name as per the MOS.
512: 387: 366: 310:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to 978: 203: 593:
is trying to rectify, primarily on the usage of Chinese characters at
1274:
Knowledge (XXG) level-5 vital articles in Society and social sciences
1230: 1203: 1180: 1171:
It seems that you are the one who did not accept my explaination. (
1162: 1143: 1124: 1082: 1063: 1034: 1010: 990: 959: 941: 905: 890: 868: 845: 827: 782: 754: 734: 716: 685: 650: 621: 576: 549: 531: 404: 400: 458: 213: 205: 15: 1264:
Knowledge (XXG) vital articles in Society and social sciences
920:
frustrating and I am not spending my time to do such things.
801:
Please move all awards (inclusive popularity awards) into
924: 810:
or just one main section for all the awards similar to
160: 1279:
C-Class vital articles in Society and social sciences
540:
Just remain as usual with all the articles. Thanks (
399:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 977:issue and should just be concentrated at just that 174: 859:something they cannot read is considered helpful? 491:On adding Chinese characters beside artistes' name 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 8: 1069:If you think the guidelines is wrong, go to 818:Personally I prefer order of presentation. 971:Just remain as usual with all the articles 361: 256: 1113:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Accessibility 923:Also with reference to your edit summary 1071:Knowledge (XXG):Village pump (proposals) 363: 258: 217: 1259:Knowledge (XXG) level-5 vital articles 324:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Singapore 7: 973:. This discussion has deviated into 473:on November 15, 2006. The result of 393:This article is within the scope of 304:This article is within the scope of 247:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 417:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Awards 14: 1289:Low-importance Singapore articles 50:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome! 1111:and if there is a need, consult 462: 386: 365: 291: 281: 260: 227: 218: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 469:This article was nominated for 437:This article has been rated as 344:This article has been rated as 1304:Low-importance awards articles 1294:WikiProject Singapore articles 1269:C-Class level-5 vital articles 327:Template:WikiProject Singapore 1: 927:, there was no discussion on 411:and see a list of open tasks. 318:and see a list of open tasks. 42:Put new text under old text. 589:on several points of which @ 420:Template:WikiProject Awards 1325: 1284:C-Class Singapore articles 1231:03:56, 21 April 2023 (UTC) 1204:03:53, 21 April 2023 (UTC) 1181:03:45, 21 April 2023 (UTC) 1163:01:38, 21 April 2023 (UTC) 1144:19:02, 20 April 2023 (UTC) 1083:04:52, 21 April 2023 (UTC) 1064:04:18, 21 April 2023 (UTC) 1035:04:09, 21 April 2023 (UTC) 1011:04:05, 21 April 2023 (UTC) 991:04:00, 21 April 2023 (UTC) 960:03:47, 21 April 2023 (UTC) 942:01:52, 21 April 2023 (UTC) 906:19:19, 20 April 2023 (UTC) 891:19:04, 20 April 2023 (UTC) 869:01:47, 21 April 2023 (UTC) 846:19:16, 20 April 2023 (UTC) 808:74th Primetime Emmy Awards 783:04:49, 21 April 2023 (UTC) 755:04:13, 21 April 2023 (UTC) 735:03:58, 21 April 2023 (UTC) 717:03:54, 21 April 2023 (UTC) 686:03:42, 21 April 2023 (UTC) 651:03:37, 21 April 2023 (UTC) 622:03:08, 21 April 2023 (UTC) 577:01:35, 21 April 2023 (UTC) 550:19:00, 20 April 2023 (UTC) 532:01:10, 20 April 2023 (UTC) 1125:02:10, 3 April 2023 (UTC) 828:02:01, 3 April 2023 (UTC) 513:01:32, 3 April 2023 (UTC) 436: 381: 343: 276: 255: 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 1299:C-Class awards articles 1223:Justanothersgwikieditor 1188:Justanothersgwikieditor 1169:Justanothersgwikieditor 1155:Justanothersgwikieditor 1132:Justanothersgwikieditor 1117:Justanothersgwikieditor 1073:and suggest otherwise. 1027:Justanothersgwikieditor 997:Justanothersgwikieditor 983:Justanothersgwikieditor 948:Justanothersgwikieditor 934:Justanothersgwikieditor 879:Justanothersgwikieditor 861:Justanothersgwikieditor 834:Justanothersgwikieditor 820:Justanothersgwikieditor 747:Justanothersgwikieditor 723:Justanothersgwikieditor 709:Justanothersgwikieditor 658:Justanothersgwikieditor 628:Justanothersgwikieditor 591:Justanothersgwikieditor 569:Justanothersgwikieditor 538:Justanothersgwikieditor 524:Justanothersgwikieditor 505:Justanothersgwikieditor 1254:C-Class vital articles 1221:and made the changes. 75:avoid personal attacks 695:, Again referring to 307:WikiProject Singapore 241:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 234:level-5 vital article 100:Neutral point of view 1215:WP:CHINESECHARACTERS 1023:WP:CHINESECHARACTERS 975:WP:CHINESECHARACTERS 929:WP:CHINESECHARACTERS 803:Winners and nominees 771:WP:CHINESECHARACTERS 697:WP:CHINESECHARACTERS 603:Request for Comments 497:WP:CHINESECHARACTERS 105:No original research 812:95th Academy Awards 490: 1115:in colour choice. 561:disruptive editing 396:WikiProject Awards 330:Singapore articles 243:content assessment 86:dispute resolution 47: 915:What happened at 485: 484: 457: 456: 453: 452: 449: 448: 360: 359: 356: 355: 212: 211: 66:Assume good faith 43: 1316: 1213:Again, refer to 1192:Star Awards 2023 972: 917:Star Awards 2023 674:Star Awards 2019 670:Star Awards 2018 666:Star Awards 2017 662:Star Awards 2016 660:, just refer to 587:Manual of Styles 502: 466: 459: 443:importance scale 425: 424: 421: 418: 415: 390: 383: 382: 377: 369: 362: 350:importance scale 332: 331: 328: 325: 322: 301: 299:Singapore portal 296: 295: 294: 285: 278: 277: 272: 264: 257: 240: 231: 230: 223: 222: 214: 206: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 16: 1324: 1323: 1319: 1318: 1317: 1315: 1314: 1313: 1309:Awards articles 1244: 1243: 1105: 799: 797:Standardisation 493: 423:awards articles 422: 419: 416: 413: 412: 375: 329: 326: 323: 320: 319: 297: 292: 290: 270: 238: 228: 208: 207: 202: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 1322: 1320: 1312: 1311: 1306: 1301: 1296: 1291: 1286: 1281: 1276: 1271: 1266: 1261: 1256: 1246: 1245: 1242: 1241: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1237: 1236: 1235: 1234: 1233: 1104: 1101: 1100: 1099: 1098: 1097: 1096: 1095: 1094: 1093: 1092: 1091: 1090: 1089: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1085: 1051: 999: 921: 894: 874: 873: 872: 871: 798: 795: 794: 793: 792: 791: 790: 789: 788: 787: 786: 785: 763: 762: 761: 760: 759: 758: 757: 700: 634: 597:(and colours ( 579: 492: 489: 487: 483: 482: 475:the discussion 467: 455: 454: 451: 450: 447: 446: 439:Low-importance 435: 429: 428: 426: 409:the discussion 391: 379: 378: 376:Low‑importance 370: 358: 357: 354: 353: 346:Low-importance 342: 336: 335: 333: 316:the discussion 303: 302: 286: 274: 273: 271:Low‑importance 265: 253: 252: 246: 224: 210: 209: 200: 198: 197: 194: 193: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1321: 1310: 1307: 1305: 1302: 1300: 1297: 1295: 1292: 1290: 1287: 1285: 1282: 1280: 1277: 1275: 1272: 1270: 1267: 1265: 1262: 1260: 1257: 1255: 1252: 1251: 1249: 1232: 1228: 1224: 1220: 1216: 1212: 1211:Unknown152438 1208: 1207: 1205: 1201: 1197: 1196:Unknown152438 1193: 1189: 1185: 1184: 1182: 1178: 1174: 1173:Unknown152438 1170: 1166: 1165: 1164: 1160: 1156: 1152: 1151:Unknown152438 1148: 1147: 1145: 1141: 1137: 1136:Unknown152438 1133: 1129: 1128: 1127: 1126: 1122: 1118: 1114: 1110: 1103:Accessibility 1102: 1084: 1080: 1076: 1072: 1068: 1067: 1065: 1061: 1057: 1056:Unknown152438 1052: 1050: 1046: 1042: 1038: 1037: 1036: 1032: 1028: 1024: 1019: 1018:Unknown152438 1015: 1014: 1012: 1008: 1004: 1003:Unknown152438 1000: 998: 994: 993: 992: 988: 984: 980: 976: 968: 967:Unknown152438 964: 963: 961: 957: 953: 952:Unknown152438 949: 945: 944: 943: 939: 935: 930: 926: 922: 918: 914: 913:Unknown152438 910: 909: 907: 903: 899: 898:Unknown152438 895: 892: 888: 884: 883:Unknown152438 880: 876: 875: 870: 866: 862: 857: 856:Unknown152438 853: 852: 851: 850: 849: 847: 843: 839: 838:Unknown152438 835: 830: 829: 825: 821: 815: 813: 809: 804: 796: 784: 780: 776: 772: 768: 767:Unknown152438 764: 756: 752: 748: 743: 742:Unknown152438 739: 738: 736: 732: 728: 727:Unknown152438 724: 720: 719: 718: 714: 710: 706: 701: 698: 694: 693:Unknown152438 690: 689: 687: 683: 679: 678:Unknown152438 675: 671: 667: 663: 659: 655: 654: 652: 648: 644: 643:Unknown152438 640: 635: 633: 629: 625: 624: 623: 619: 615: 611: 609: 604: 600: 596: 592: 588: 584: 583:Unknown152438 580: 578: 574: 570: 566: 562: 558: 557:Unknown152438 554: 553: 551: 547: 543: 542:Unknown152438 539: 535: 534: 533: 529: 525: 521: 520:Unknown152438 517: 516: 515: 514: 510: 506: 498: 488: 480: 476: 472: 468: 465: 461: 460: 444: 440: 434: 431: 430: 427: 410: 406: 402: 398: 397: 392: 389: 385: 384: 380: 374: 371: 368: 364: 351: 347: 341: 338: 337: 334: 317: 313: 309: 308: 300: 289: 287: 284: 280: 279: 275: 269: 266: 263: 259: 254: 250: 244: 236: 235: 225: 221: 216: 215: 196: 195: 192: 189: 187: 183: 182: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 1106: 831: 816: 802: 800: 704: 607: 494: 486: 478: 438: 394: 345: 305: 249:WikiProjects 232: 184: 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 1075:– robertsky 775:– robertsky 614:– robertsky 610:at MOS page 595:MOS:CHINESE 148:free images 31:not a forum 25:Star Awards 1248:Categories 1041:Sculture65 599:WP:COLOURS 1109:MOS:COLOR 1049:Robertsky 639:Robertsky 632:Robertsky 321:Singapore 312:Singapore 268:Singapore 237:is rated 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 567:issues. 471:deletion 186:Archives 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 1219:WP:BOLD 1025:again. 979:section 608:Note a 441:on the 348:on the 239:C-class 154:WP refs 142:scholar 1045:TVSGuy 565:WP:OWN 414:Awards 405:prizes 401:awards 373:Awards 245:scale. 126:Google 495:From 226:This 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 1227:talk 1200:talk 1177:talk 1159:talk 1140:talk 1121:talk 1079:talk 1060:talk 1031:talk 1007:talk 987:talk 956:talk 938:talk 925:here 902:talk 887:talk 865:talk 842:talk 824:talk 779:talk 751:talk 731:talk 713:talk 705:slow 682:talk 647:talk 618:talk 573:talk 563:and 546:talk 528:talk 509:talk 479:keep 477:was 403:and 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 612:). 433:Low 340:Low 176:TWL 1250:: 1229:) 1206:) 1202:) 1183:) 1179:) 1161:) 1146:) 1142:) 1123:) 1081:) 1066:) 1062:) 1033:) 1013:) 1009:) 989:) 981:. 962:) 958:) 940:) 908:) 904:) 889:) 867:) 848:) 844:) 826:) 781:) 753:) 737:) 733:) 715:) 688:) 684:) 672:, 668:, 664:, 653:) 649:) 620:) 575:) 552:) 548:) 530:) 511:) 499:, 156:) 54:; 1225:( 1209:@ 1198:( 1186:@ 1175:( 1167:@ 1157:( 1149:@ 1138:( 1130:@ 1119:( 1077:( 1058:( 1047:@ 1043:@ 1039:@ 1029:( 1016:@ 1005:( 995:@ 985:( 965:@ 954:( 946:@ 936:( 911:@ 900:( 893:) 885:( 877:@ 863:( 854:@ 840:( 832:@ 822:( 777:( 765:@ 749:( 740:@ 729:( 721:@ 711:( 691:@ 680:( 656:@ 645:( 630:@ 626:@ 616:( 581:@ 571:( 555:@ 544:( 536:@ 526:( 518:@ 507:( 481:. 445:. 352:. 251:: 191:1 188:: 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 58:.

Index

talk page
Star Awards
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Archives
1

level-5 vital article
content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.