Knowledge

Talk:Stochastic process

Source đź“ť

1067:
variables is known as a random field, which is then a generalization of a stochastic/random process. This is a popular convention. But many books also keep the index set for a stochastic processes very general, which means that a random field is just a specific case of a stochastic/random process. I have tried to include both viewpoints or conventions. I think the article on random fields should be kept and then extended and improved, using some of the references cited in the stochastic process article (eg the books by Alder).
301: 280: 400: 390: 369: 247: 586: 495: 474: 657: 207: 1187:"A martingale is a discrete-time or continuous-time stochastic process with the property that, given all the previous values of the process, the expectation of the next value of a martingale is equal to the current value." – For discrete time it is OK, but for continuous time it is not. What could be meant by "next value" and "current value" when the time is continuous? If these are 505: 238: 1294:. We should either formulate it for discrete time only (and send the reader to the main article for more), or give a correct formulation for continuous time. If we prefer a simple but incorrect formulation for accessibility (which I doubt we should) then AT LEAST we should warn the reader by such words as "roughly" etc. 1090:
For example, to some people, a Poisson (point) process is something that evolves over time (ie it is defined on the real line), while for others it's something that can be defined on the real line or much more general spaces. In the LĂ©vy process literature, often people say "Poisson process" to refer
960:
I didn't include many applications. Each major stochastic process (at least all the ones covered) have an abundance of applications, so I thought it would not be difficult for contributors to find applications. Also, perhaps, detailed examples of applications belong on the articles of the individual
1167:
Many thanks. I wrote the article a few months ago, thinking a re-write was the best approach, but I just didn't have the time to do the citations until now. As "increasing numbers", sure. It's a fair point. It actually took some effort to write that introduction. I wanted it to be understandable
1066:
The previous article version had the index set as being one-dimensional (or some totally-ordered set T), so the interpretation was that stochastic processes evolve over time, which meant if we replace the index set with the Cartesian plane (or some manifold), then the resulting collection of random
820:
I have used the traditional mathematical definition of a stochastic process (ie an index collection of random variables). (I say "traditional" because two separate books wrote that and many other books use this mathematical definition). I have then given the traditional interpretation of this (ie a
780:
I have completely re-written the article from scratch. I tried to capture all the key parts from the previous version of the article. Apologies if I have left out key contributions. Apologies also if I have made any mistakes or broken any rules or guidlines (I'm relatively new at wikipedia). I will
755:
Agreed. AND Knowledge has a specific and agreed mandate to write at the level of beginners, or, at least, a high school junior or senior. THAT is concensus on this project, and has been for almost two decades. Mathematics and statistics/probability are not the exception to that rule, nor should
875:
For books, I have tried to always cite the page number, unless referring to a subject covered by the whole book. I have also done the same, mostly, for longer articles, with the exception of a couple of articles, such as the historical pieces/memoires by Harald Cramér (1976) and Paul-André Meyer
860:
I have tried to be very generous in citing. (Perhaps too much in some cases). I did this partly to strengthen claims like "commonly used", but ultimately I am trying to make it easier for contributors to use the citations to improve other related articles. It also makes it easier for everybody to
976:
Hi, I think this article as it stands is quite outstanding for wiki standard. While I did not find the lack of applications bothersome, I do wonder if mentioning some of the typical problems/questions that are investigated in the study of stochastic process would be worthwhile. Things like first
1308:
I propose: "A martingale is a discrete-time or continuous-time stochastic process with the property that, at every instant, given the current value and all the past values of the process, the conditional expectation of every future value is equal to the current value. In discrete time, if this
1086:
Point processes have a couple of interpretations, with literature (for many years now) favouring the random measure one. Some, perhaps most, authors consider points processes and stochastic/random processes as different objects, while acknowledging that some stochastic processes (eg ones with
700:
Simple as it may be, this article, or at least the introduction, are filled with jargon and are not written at an acceptable reading level. I recommended that those who are knowledgeable on the subject matter revise the introduction and make it more accessible to the public. As is, this is
1151:
A small remark on the phrase "Historically, the random variables were indexed by some set of increasing numbers" (in the lead): I feel what you mean, but still, "increasing number" sounds bad. Every set of real numbers is ordered naturally, which is not a reason to call it "increasing".
840:
To describe individual stochastic processes, I think using more words than mathematics is a better approach in such a general article. Admittedly, we then don't know the precise mathematical definition of each process, but then the person can click on the main article of each process
800:
Although 95+% of people who are interested in stochastic processes are probably interested in models of something, a stochastic process does not, strictly speaking, need to be a model of anything. So I changed the opening sentence used in the previous article version.
1037:
The article previous version had a signicant section (perhaps a third) dedicated to the construction (and its issues) of stochastic processes. Although important for some mathematicians, I think most readers will not be interested in this, so I have put it at the end.
1057:
I tried to put the important definitions towards the start of the article and the less important ones at the end. I have tried to make the order of the defintions flow logically (eg we need to separability before we can talk about how to resolve construction issues).
153: 995:
I sort of tried to do that with the classic processes, Brownian/Wiener and Poisson, giving their original applications in the history section. But I suppose one can cite other typical examples earlier on, where the articles are first described in
1091:
to the random object on the real line, while reserving "Poisson random measure" for the Poisson point process on the higher dimensions (usually the Cartesian product between the half-line and the space that the state space of the LĂ©vy process).
661: 1113:
I am not sure which term is better. Part of me thinks Wiener process is more appropriate for the mathematical object. But then many people, perhaps most, use simply "Brownian motion" when referring to the stochastic
147: 351: 456: 1434: 741:
can be enhanced. Specialist already know the material-- you don't write an encyclopedia article for specialists, you write it for beginners. Put technical details at the end.
198: 1268: 1424: 1239: 1212: 168: 1439: 135: 1087:
discrete state spaces) can be re-considered by looking at their corresponding point processes. Some consider point process as types of stochastic processes.
251: 1449: 341: 1474: 1464: 561: 551: 446: 79: 44: 129: 1419: 1358:
The article is poorly written and not very accessible to the layman. I did what I could to improve the opening paragraph, but it could use more work
677: 895:
The article needs more diagrams. I think there are some good diagrams on other stochastic process articles (eg Wiener process), which can be re-used.
1454: 1479: 1429: 125: 422: 756:
they be. I am not unschooled in mathematics nor in statistics, and I find this jargony lede circular and unintelligible. We can do better.
1459: 708: 317: 175: 85: 1444: 527: 1469: 1395: 1373: 1378: 607: 602: 413: 374: 194: 190: 141: 308: 285: 1414: 1018:
The article has a large history section. If that's an issue, I suggest moving sections to the articles on individual articles.
518: 479: 99: 30: 660:
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available
104: 20: 728: 510: 74: 260: 1343: 1173: 1138: 1119: 1099: 1072: 1043: 1023: 1001: 966: 946: 919: 900: 881: 866: 846: 826: 806: 786: 640: 65: 821:
random system evolving over time). I later write a stochastic process can also be interpreted as a random function.
933:
I think the defintions are all correct, but a second (or third, fourth etc) opinion would be nice, particularly on
206: 185: 746: 712: 619: 217: 724: 723:
Hopefully, the writing for the specialists can be maintained, and writing for beginners added right after. —
1391: 1369: 109: 1339: 1169: 1134: 1115: 1095: 1068: 1039: 1019: 997: 962: 942: 915: 896: 877: 862: 842: 822: 802: 782: 876:(translated in 2009) as well as some of the articles used in the history section of statistical physics. 266: 399: 300: 279: 1383: 1361: 742: 704: 237: 761: 161: 55: 1379:
https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/126791/is-a-time-series-the-same-as-a-stochastic-process
526:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
421:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
316:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1387: 1365: 982: 685: 625: 405: 222: 70: 24: 389: 368: 51: 1328: 1314: 1299: 1244: 1157: 621: 585: 219: 1217: 1190: 757: 1408: 978: 681: 669: 665: 1168:
to normal people. But I guess most people will assume the numbers are increasing.
494: 473: 701:
unreadable unless the reader has an extensive learning history with statistics.
1324: 1310: 1295: 1153: 656: 418: 623: 500: 395: 313: 221: 1399: 1347: 1332: 1318: 1303: 1177: 1161: 1142: 1123: 1103: 1076: 1047: 1027: 1005: 986: 970: 950: 923: 904: 885: 870: 850: 830: 810: 790: 781:
now detail reasons for the re-write and possible issues of the new version.
765: 750: 732: 716: 689: 523: 504: 1309:
property holds for the next value, then it holds for all future values."
977:
passage time (e.g. in gambler's ruin problems, diffusion process), etc.
1094:
I have tried to inclde these different viewpoints or conventions.
626: 579: 231: 223: 15: 914:
The article needs more links to other Knowledge articles.
160: 1247: 1220: 1193: 651:
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
522:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 417:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 312:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 1323:No objections, no remarks? Well, now implemented. 1262: 1233: 1206: 861:find a book or resource if there are more options. 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 1435:Knowledge level-4 vital articles in Mathematics 1109:Wiener process versus Brownian motion (process) 796:Mathematical object versus mathematical model 634:This page has archives. Sections older than 174: 8: 935:finite-dimensional probability distributions 1082:Stochastic processes versus point processes 1381: 1359: 468: 363: 274: 1246: 1225: 1219: 1198: 1192: 1183:Martingale in continuous time - incorrect 1062:Stochastic processes versus random fields 678:Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment 1425:Knowledge vital articles in Mathematics 676:Above undated message substituted from 470: 365: 276: 235: 644:when more than 5 sections are present. 1440:B-Class vital articles in Mathematics 929:Mathematical defintions need checking 7: 1338:Sounds good. No objections. Thanks. 516:This article is within the scope of 411:This article is within the scope of 306:This article is within the scope of 816:Traditional mathematical definition 265:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 1450:Top-importance Statistics articles 14: 1475:Mid-importance Economics articles 1465:Top-priority mathematics articles 1148:Thank you for the excellent work! 638:may be automatically archived by 431:Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics 1420:Knowledge level-4 vital articles 655: 584: 503: 493: 472: 434:Template:WikiProject Mathematics 398: 388: 367: 326:Knowledge:WikiProject Statistics 299: 278: 245: 236: 205: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 1455:WikiProject Statistics articles 556:This article has been rated as 536:Knowledge:WikiProject Economics 451:This article has been rated as 346:This article has been rated as 329:Template:WikiProject Statistics 1480:WikiProject Economics articles 1430:B-Class level-4 vital articles 1376:) 23:46, 16 October 2020 (UTC) 1348:06:38, 20 September 2018 (UTC) 1333:15:41, 17 September 2018 (UTC) 1319:19:51, 15 September 2018 (UTC) 1304:10:17, 14 September 2018 (UTC) 737:No, hopefully the writing for 733:14:41, 30 September 2013 (UTC) 539:Template:WikiProject Economics 1: 776:Article completely re-written 530:and see a list of open tasks. 511:Business and economics portal 425:and see a list of open tasks. 320:and see a list of open tasks. 42:Put new text under old text. 1460:B-Class mathematics articles 1400:23:40, 16 October 2020 (UTC) 1033:Construction towards the end 766:16:43, 7 November 2018 (UTC) 690:10:14, 17 January 2022 (UTC) 1445:B-Class Statistics articles 1178:20:03, 4 January 2017 (UTC) 1162:19:21, 4 January 2017 (UTC) 1143:15:25, 4 January 2017 (UTC) 1124:13:25, 4 January 2017 (UTC) 1104:13:25, 4 January 2017 (UTC) 1077:13:25, 4 January 2017 (UTC) 1048:13:25, 4 January 2017 (UTC) 1028:13:25, 4 January 2017 (UTC) 971:13:25, 4 January 2017 (UTC) 951:13:25, 4 January 2017 (UTC) 924:13:25, 4 January 2017 (UTC) 905:13:25, 4 January 2017 (UTC) 886:13:25, 2 January 2017 (UTC) 871:13:25, 2 January 2017 (UTC) 851:13:25, 4 January 2017 (UTC) 831:13:25, 4 January 2017 (UTC) 811:13:25, 4 January 2017 (UTC) 791:13:25, 4 January 2017 (UTC) 50:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 1496: 1470:B-Class Economics articles 1006:09:03, 16 March 2018 (UTC) 987:22:44, 10 April 2017 (UTC) 717:23:13, 6 August 2013 (UTC) 562:project's importance scale 555: 488: 450: 383: 345: 294: 273: 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 836:Words versus mathematics 751:13:45, 8 July 2016 (UTC) 457:project's priority scale 1263:{\displaystyle s<t,} 414:WikiProject Mathematics 1415:B-Class vital articles 1264: 1235: 1208: 856:Abundance of citations 641:Lowercase sigmabot III 309:WikiProject Statistics 75:avoid personal attacks 1265: 1236: 1234:{\displaystyle X_{t}} 1209: 1207:{\displaystyle X_{s}} 664:. Student editor(s): 519:WikiProject Economics 252:level-4 vital article 199:Auto-archiving period 100:Neutral point of view 1245: 1218: 1191: 1133:Thanks for reading. 1129:End of my discussion 1014:Abundance of history 437:mathematics articles 105:No original research 725:Charles Edwin Shipp 332:Statistics articles 1260: 1231: 1204: 668:. Peer reviewers: 662:on the course page 542:Economics articles 406:Mathematics portal 261:content assessment 86:dispute resolution 47: 25:Stochastic process 1402: 1386:comment added by 1377: 1364:comment added by 1340:Improbable keeler 1290:is not "next" to 1274:is not "next" to 1170:Improbable keeler 1135:Improbable keeler 1116:Improbable keeler 1096:Improbable keeler 1069:Improbable keeler 1040:Improbable keeler 1020:Improbable keeler 998:Improbable keeler 963:Improbable keeler 943:Improbable keeler 916:Improbable keeler 897:Improbable keeler 878:Improbable keeler 863:Improbable keeler 843:Improbable keeler 823:Improbable keeler 803:Improbable keeler 783:Improbable keeler 707:comment added by 648: 647: 613: 612: 576: 575: 572: 571: 568: 567: 467: 466: 463: 462: 362: 361: 358: 357: 230: 229: 66:Assume good faith 43: 1487: 1269: 1267: 1266: 1261: 1240: 1238: 1237: 1232: 1230: 1229: 1213: 1211: 1210: 1205: 1203: 1202: 719: 692: 659: 643: 627: 599: 598: 588: 580: 544: 543: 540: 537: 534: 513: 508: 507: 497: 490: 489: 484: 476: 469: 439: 438: 435: 432: 429: 408: 403: 402: 392: 385: 384: 379: 371: 364: 352:importance scale 334: 333: 330: 327: 324: 303: 296: 295: 290: 282: 275: 258: 249: 248: 241: 240: 232: 224: 210: 209: 200: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 16: 1495: 1494: 1490: 1489: 1488: 1486: 1485: 1484: 1405: 1404: 1356: 1325:Boris Tsirelson 1311:Boris Tsirelson 1296:Boris Tsirelson 1243: 1242: 1221: 1216: 1215: 1194: 1189: 1188: 1185: 1154:Boris Tsirelson 1131: 1111: 1084: 1064: 1055: 1035: 1016: 958: 931: 912: 893: 858: 838: 818: 798: 778: 743:Geoffrey.landis 709:173.162.169.233 702: 698: 675: 653: 639: 628: 622: 593: 541: 538: 535: 532: 531: 509: 502: 482: 436: 433: 430: 427: 426: 404: 397: 377: 331: 328: 325: 322: 321: 288: 259:on Knowledge's 256: 246: 226: 225: 220: 197: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 1493: 1491: 1483: 1482: 1477: 1472: 1467: 1462: 1457: 1452: 1447: 1442: 1437: 1432: 1427: 1422: 1417: 1407: 1406: 1355: 1354:Poorly written 1352: 1351: 1350: 1286:, then again, 1259: 1256: 1253: 1250: 1228: 1224: 1201: 1197: 1184: 1181: 1165: 1164: 1149: 1130: 1127: 1110: 1107: 1083: 1080: 1063: 1060: 1054: 1051: 1034: 1031: 1015: 1012: 1011: 1010: 1009: 1008: 990: 989: 957: 954: 930: 927: 911: 908: 892: 889: 857: 854: 837: 834: 817: 814: 797: 794: 777: 774: 773: 772: 771: 770: 769: 768: 697: 694: 652: 649: 646: 645: 633: 630: 629: 624: 620: 618: 615: 614: 611: 610: 605: 595: 594: 589: 583: 574: 573: 570: 569: 566: 565: 558:Mid-importance 554: 548: 547: 545: 528:the discussion 515: 514: 498: 486: 485: 483:Mid‑importance 477: 465: 464: 461: 460: 449: 443: 442: 440: 423:the discussion 410: 409: 393: 381: 380: 372: 360: 359: 356: 355: 348:Top-importance 344: 338: 337: 335: 318:the discussion 304: 292: 291: 289:Top‑importance 283: 271: 270: 264: 242: 228: 227: 218: 216: 215: 212: 211: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1492: 1481: 1478: 1476: 1473: 1471: 1468: 1466: 1463: 1461: 1458: 1456: 1453: 1451: 1448: 1446: 1443: 1441: 1438: 1436: 1433: 1431: 1428: 1426: 1423: 1421: 1418: 1416: 1413: 1412: 1410: 1403: 1401: 1397: 1393: 1389: 1388:Unified field 1385: 1380: 1375: 1371: 1367: 1366:Unified field 1363: 1353: 1349: 1345: 1341: 1337: 1336: 1335: 1334: 1330: 1326: 1321: 1320: 1316: 1312: 1306: 1305: 1301: 1297: 1293: 1289: 1285: 1281: 1277: 1273: 1257: 1254: 1251: 1248: 1226: 1222: 1199: 1195: 1182: 1180: 1179: 1175: 1171: 1163: 1159: 1155: 1150: 1147: 1146: 1145: 1144: 1140: 1136: 1128: 1126: 1125: 1121: 1117: 1108: 1106: 1105: 1101: 1097: 1092: 1088: 1081: 1079: 1078: 1074: 1070: 1061: 1059: 1052: 1050: 1049: 1045: 1041: 1032: 1030: 1029: 1025: 1021: 1013: 1007: 1003: 999: 994: 993: 992: 991: 988: 984: 980: 975: 974: 973: 972: 968: 964: 955: 953: 952: 948: 944: 940: 936: 928: 926: 925: 921: 917: 909: 907: 906: 902: 898: 890: 888: 887: 883: 879: 873: 872: 868: 864: 855: 853: 852: 848: 844: 835: 833: 832: 828: 824: 815: 813: 812: 808: 804: 795: 793: 792: 788: 784: 775: 767: 763: 759: 754: 753: 752: 748: 744: 740: 736: 735: 734: 730: 726: 722: 721: 720: 718: 714: 710: 706: 696:Reading Level 695: 693: 691: 687: 683: 679: 673: 671: 667: 663: 658: 650: 642: 637: 632: 631: 617: 616: 609: 606: 604: 601: 600: 597: 596: 592: 587: 582: 581: 578: 563: 559: 553: 550: 549: 546: 529: 525: 521: 520: 512: 506: 501: 499: 496: 492: 491: 487: 481: 478: 475: 471: 458: 454: 448: 445: 444: 441: 424: 420: 416: 415: 407: 401: 396: 394: 391: 387: 386: 382: 376: 373: 370: 366: 353: 349: 343: 340: 339: 336: 319: 315: 311: 310: 305: 302: 298: 297: 293: 287: 284: 281: 277: 272: 268: 262: 254: 253: 243: 239: 234: 233: 214: 213: 208: 204: 196: 192: 189: 187: 183: 182: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 1382:— Preceding 1360:— Preceding 1357: 1322: 1307: 1291: 1287: 1283: 1279: 1275: 1271: 1186: 1166: 1132: 1112: 1093: 1089: 1085: 1065: 1056: 1036: 1017: 959: 956:Applications 939:separability 938: 934: 932: 913: 894: 874: 859: 839: 819: 799: 779: 738: 703:— Preceding 699: 674: 654: 635: 590: 577: 557: 517: 453:Top-priority 452: 412: 378:Top‑priority 347: 307: 267:WikiProjects 250: 202: 184: 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 1053:Definitions 428:Mathematics 419:mathematics 375:Mathematics 148:free images 31:not a forum 1409:Categories 961:processes. 323:Statistics 314:statistics 286:Statistics 1278:. And if 739:beginners 608:Archive 2 603:Archive 1 533:Economics 524:Economics 480:Economics 255:is rated 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 1396:contribs 1384:unsigned 1374:contribs 1362:unsigned 1114:process. 979:Manoguru 891:Diagrams 841:covered. 705:unsigned 682:PrimeBOT 670:Chaley17 666:Chaley17 636:365 days 591:Archives 203:365 days 186:Archives 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 996:detail. 560:on the 455:on the 350:on the 257:B-class 154:WP refs 142:scholar 1241:where 263:scale. 126:Google 1270:then 910:Links 244:This 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 1392:talk 1370:talk 1344:talk 1329:talk 1315:talk 1300:talk 1252:< 1214:and 1174:talk 1158:talk 1139:talk 1120:talk 1100:talk 1073:talk 1044:talk 1024:talk 1002:talk 983:talk 967:talk 947:talk 937:and 920:talk 901:talk 882:talk 867:talk 847:talk 827:talk 807:talk 787:talk 762:talk 758:rags 747:talk 729:talk 713:talk 686:talk 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 680:by 552:Mid 447:Top 342:Top 176:TWL 1411:: 1398:) 1394:• 1372:• 1346:) 1331:) 1317:) 1302:) 1176:) 1160:) 1141:) 1122:) 1102:) 1075:) 1046:) 1026:) 1004:) 985:) 969:) 949:) 941:. 922:) 903:) 884:) 869:) 849:) 829:) 809:) 789:) 764:) 749:) 731:) 715:) 688:) 672:. 201:: 193:, 156:) 54:; 1390:( 1368:( 1342:( 1327:( 1313:( 1298:( 1292:s 1288:t 1284:t 1282:= 1280:s 1276:s 1272:t 1258:, 1255:t 1249:s 1227:t 1223:X 1200:s 1196:X 1172:( 1156:( 1137:( 1118:( 1098:( 1071:( 1042:( 1022:( 1000:( 981:( 965:( 945:( 918:( 899:( 880:( 865:( 845:( 825:( 805:( 785:( 760:( 745:( 727:( 711:( 684:( 564:. 459:. 354:. 269:: 195:2 191:1 188:: 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 58:.

Index

talk page
Stochastic process
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Archives
1
2


level-4 vital article
content assessment

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑