466:
work to create a useful entry (of any length). If it is not notable, then it shouldn't be included at all (at least not on a list of major areas). The argument that the section is not very long, doesn't speak at all to whether or not the subfield is notable. And since this is a collaborative encyclopedia, section length will always be in flux. My opinion has nothing to do with the merits of critical psychology - it has to do with the fact that is is not a major research area or degree specialization. To include it in the same list as social, cognitive, and developmental psychology (which gives it the appearance of equal weight) just seems absurd. Because of its breadth, psychology is already a difficult topic for people to understand. We're not doing anyone any favors by clouding the picture and highlighting niche disciplines. This list is entirely too long (there isn't a psychology department in the world that has 23 separate areas); eliminating critical psychology, global psychology, and postmodern psychology seemed like a conservative approach to focusing the scope of this list.
243:
222:
345:
327:
191:
253:
581:
This list is more updated in division of psychology for the description of its research, development and application. As a matter of fact, lots of information contains in the page of "Psychology" is not the perspective of contemporary psychology nowadays, which is more multicultural and dualistic.
465:
Note that the lede for the page says that the article covers the "major areas of inquiry that comprise psychology." It is not meant to be a comprehensive list. To me, due weight is the consideration of whether or not a topic should be included at all. If a subfield is notable, then editors should
432:
in the process. The tiny passage certainly does not bloat the article beyond size limits. If that two-paragraph subsection carries undue weight, then it always could be trimmed to, say, one paragraph (probably the first). If, in terms of content, Knowledge (XXG) is to stand out from conventional
447:
P.S. As far as due weight is concerned, the subsection (if re-added) would be one of twenty-three listed. And 1/23 (roughly 4.3%) is not very much at all. Too much "spice" can be overwhelming, but even just a little bit can help to keep the intellectual taste buds awake.
153:
420:: True, critical psychology is rather esoteric. But a passage on critical psychology "spices things up" a bit; it adds some pertinent--if surprising--variety. And, since Knowledge (XXG) is
147:
509:. Unfortunately, a destination article for the merge was never identified. A fully formed proposal is needed before any meaningful merger discussion can take place.
44:
309:
79:
631:
299:
646:
389:
395:
636:
275:
85:
626:
30:
433:
encyclopedias, it's going to have to be somewhat unconventional at times. Indeed, it'll have to be a little "esoteric" in its own right.
651:
365:
266:
227:
168:
99:
641:
135:
104:
20:
74:
598:
202:
530:
361:
357:
352:
332:
65:
613:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
129:
125:
109:
175:
208:
546:
471:
24:
586:
453:
438:
594:
55:
541:. What criterion could there be for being a "psychology discipline" but not a "subfield of psychology"?
274:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
421:
70:
514:
141:
590:
538:
568:
161:
542:
467:
449:
434:
258:
51:
425:
429:
510:
559:
620:
602:
575:
550:
518:
475:
457:
442:
242:
221:
271:
248:
344:
326:
529:
I don't find a merge proposal on these talk pages, but merger of this with
424:, we can do those sorts of things, so long as we don't violate
184:
15:
364:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
418:
160:
498:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
270:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
174:
394:This article has not yet received a rating on the
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
537:. Having the two pages separate is an obvious
501:A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
8:
356:, an attempt to structure and organize all
321:
216:
190:
188:
360:. If you wish to help, please visit the
323:
218:
284:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Psychology
417:Wow, no discussion yet?! Anyway, re.
7:
492:The following discussion is closed.
350:This article is within the scope of
264:This article is within the scope of
207:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
632:Top-importance psychology articles
505:The result of this discussion was
14:
374:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Lists
50:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome!
647:Unknown-importance List articles
609:The discussion above is closed.
343:
325:
251:
241:
220:
189:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
637:WikiProject Psychology articles
304:This article has been rated as
287:Template:WikiProject Psychology
627:List-Class psychology articles
558:Two names for the same thing.
531:List of psychology disciplines
1:
603:01:12, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
358:list pages on Knowledge (XXG)
278:and see a list of open tasks.
42:Put new text under old text.
519:16:07, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
476:20:30, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
458:18:30, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
443:16:27, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
576:19:47, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
551:13:32, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
668:
652:WikiProject Lists articles
396:project's importance scale
377:Template:WikiProject Lists
310:project's importance scale
393:
338:
303:
236:
215:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
642:List-Class List articles
611:Please do not modify it.
495:Please do not modify it.
25:Subfields of psychology
267:WikiProject Psychology
197:This article is rated
75:avoid personal attacks
533:is a good idea, so I
201:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
100:Neutral point of view
105:No original research
413:Critical psychology
290:psychology articles
203:content assessment
86:dispute resolution
47:
606:
589:comment added by
410:
409:
406:
405:
402:
401:
353:WikiProject Lists
320:
319:
316:
315:
259:Psychology portal
183:
182:
66:Assume good faith
43:
659:
605:
583:
573:
572:
566:
565:
497:
382:
381:
378:
375:
372:
347:
340:
339:
329:
322:
292:
291:
288:
285:
282:
261:
256:
255:
254:
245:
238:
237:
232:
224:
217:
200:
194:
193:
192:
185:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
667:
666:
662:
661:
660:
658:
657:
656:
617:
616:
615:
614:
584:
570:
569:
561:
560:
526:
493:
486:
415:
379:
376:
373:
370:
369:
289:
286:
283:
280:
279:
257:
252:
250:
230:
198:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
665:
663:
655:
654:
649:
644:
639:
634:
629:
619:
618:
608:
579:
578:
553:
525:
524:
523:
522:
521:
488:
487:
485:
482:
481:
480:
479:
478:
414:
411:
408:
407:
404:
403:
400:
399:
392:
386:
385:
383:
348:
336:
335:
330:
318:
317:
314:
313:
306:Top-importance
302:
296:
295:
293:
276:the discussion
263:
262:
246:
234:
233:
231:Top‑importance
225:
213:
212:
206:
195:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
664:
653:
650:
648:
645:
643:
640:
638:
635:
633:
630:
628:
625:
624:
622:
612:
607:
604:
600:
596:
592:
588:
577:
574:
567:
564:
557:
554:
552:
548:
544:
543:MartinPoulter
540:
536:
532:
528:
527:
520:
516:
512:
508:
504:
503:
502:
499:
496:
490:
489:
483:
477:
473:
469:
468:Osubuckeyeguy
464:
463:
462:
461:
460:
459:
455:
451:
445:
444:
440:
436:
431:
427:
423:
419:
412:
397:
391:
388:
387:
384:
380:List articles
367:
363:
359:
355:
354:
349:
346:
342:
341:
337:
334:
331:
328:
324:
311:
307:
301:
298:
297:
294:
277:
273:
269:
268:
260:
249:
247:
244:
240:
239:
235:
229:
226:
223:
219:
214:
210:
204:
196:
187:
186:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
610:
585:— Preceding
580:
562:
555:
534:
507:No Consensus
506:
500:
494:
491:
450:Cosmic Latte
446:
435:Cosmic Latte
416:
362:project page
351:
305:
265:
209:WikiProjects
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
422:WP:NOTPAPER
148:free images
31:not a forum
621:Categories
539:WP:POVFORK
511:NukeofEarl
366:discussion
281:Psychology
272:Psychology
228:Psychology
199:List-class
591:Anneisceo
563:Lova Falk
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
599:contribs
587:unsigned
556:Support.
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
535:support
426:WP:SIZE
308:on the
154:WP refs
142:scholar
430:WP:DUE
205:scale.
126:Google
484:Merge
371:Lists
333:Lists
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
595:talk
571:talk
547:talk
515:talk
472:talk
454:talk
439:talk
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
428:or
390:???
300:Top
176:TWL
623::
601:)
597:•
549:)
517:)
474:)
456:)
441:)
156:)
54:;
593:(
545:(
513:(
470:(
452:(
437:(
398:.
368:.
312:.
211::
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
