1812:
is wrong. More generally, the problem with hypothesizing that all these tribes come from Caesar's Suebi is that first of all
Tacitus does not take that view and second Suebia is a very large territory, over half of Germany. Although you can argue that the Marcomanni and Quadi came downstream from Caesar's Suebi, you can't deal at all with Suiones, the Balts and the Finno-Ugrians in this way and have no choice but to arbitrarily reject all parts of Tacitus except those that fit that narrow hypothesis; hence, the need to invent a great skepticism of Tacitus. But if Tacitus is unreliable in those parts, why would he be reliable in all the rest? We need to take the most general and open interpretation here and in fact all the articles on the Balts take Tacitus seriously about the Aestii and the etymologists do connect Suebi with Suiones. So, whatever the prehistoric migrational situation was we can't assume it all happened just before Caesar got there. Either we just throw Tacitus totally out as some kind of hortatory propaganda or we have to consider everything he says. I don't say we can't find evidence to dispute it. But in fact Tacitus corresponds more or less to Ptolemy and the other sources, which I will be bringing in below. As for the part about the Huns, well, that information is covered in the parts of the article that deal with that time, which is at the very end of the classical Suebic identity. Understand, the population of the Suebi did not suddenly vanish, they only started assuming other identites, such as Alamannic, Alsatian, Bavarian, Swiss, eventually Austrian, what have you. In any case only some of them were concentrated on the Elbe; that is, the statement takes the narrow view. On to the rest of the article.
1610:
is basic knowledge. It is NOT obvious to the general reader. As it is not basic knowledge and if someone else has it, how about a note? You can't just say "following
Mommsen I understand." You need a citation with a page number and I would further suggest you quote a phrase as I did, but in the article on Germania. The latter needs reworking and expansion but so do most articles in this area and I would face the same problem if I were to do it, which, if no volunteers come forward, I may have to. For the rest, Tacitus is not THE classical source. I deny that. The other classical authors do not appear in the article because no one put them there yet (I did not write the article). I do plan to cover them but I'm going sequentially so I encountered these statements by you first. And for the "land sakes alive", I got no idea vis a vis the subject why you would have that reaction. The reader needs to know the classical sources are equivocal. That note on Widsith actually is rather extensive even though the Suebi are mentioned in one line of the poem. It does present the issue fairly with ancient sources. It is not a new or obscure issue. In case the book is not available to you, it can be previewed on Google. And, I don't know what you mean by strained notes, but that brings me to mind, would you mind using proper citation format on your citations?
1620:
user page. That's all right. I forgive you. Maybe it needed deletion. I can't remember that you ever had anything good to say about my editing, even though I have gotten some recognition from my other peers. Your remarks generally border on ad hominem, not quite enough to attract the attention of the administration. I am sure you are a valuable contributor and I appreciate you for many things you have done. As I gained more experience I thought you were often peremptory and wrong with a tendency to belittle rather than guide. However I accepted your comments with no complaint. What I am not going to do, though, is be belittled out of working on an article that needs work and in which I am interested. My apprenticeship is over. My notes are not strained. Your opinions are not obvious information. I know as much if not more than you about the topic. So, I'm not going to be belittled out of it. You might as well drop that tone. I think I'm a reasonable man and can work with reasonable men. If you do not reply reasonably I wiil stop responding to you in any way at all.
1556:
well, it is an interesting opinion. Publish it somewhere else, tip me off, and I will make sure it gets in there. As for the Roman public setting up the polarities, really, that goes too far. You are giving sociological conjectures as the reason why the words of
Tacitus might not be taken at face value nowadays, thus involving yourself in cultural relativism. We don't care if he or they happened to be bipolar or if this condition mandated a hortatory approach, what we want to know is how trustworthy are the statements of Tacitus with regard to the truth. He himself admitted that he was relying on different sources with contradictory stories. You make it sound as though just now after 2000 years we are discovering that because of the sociology Tacitus can't be trusted, a fact never ever revealed before in the long history of Tacitean scholarship. Really.
2637:
itself. 2. While you may be right about the
Southern German and Alpine area, there are certainly some linguists who doubt that we should be confident about whether the early NON-Suebian (or perhaps non Irmionic is a better term) Germanic tribes, actually spoke a language which would be categorized today as Germanic, even if it was a kind of lost cousin for example. Remember we have very little evidence for that and in fact Celtic seems to have been the cultural language that comes across in "German" names etc. The Suebian (and presumably related Chatti and Cherusci) German seems to have over-run the earlier languages of northern Germany or else they would be more distinct. (The consonant changes and other things which distinguish north and south German mainly happened later.)--
1452:
were soon nullified; his brother
Tiberius had to campaign again. Shortly the Marcomanni required military operations and they were under the name of Suebi. That region between the Rhine and the Danube was the most heavily fortified with 3 or more big bases, walls and river commands. If the border was secure, why maintain this apparatus? Well, I looked at the citation on this and it requires me to learn Swedish and buy access to the Swedish national encyclopedia! I bet, even if I did so, I would not find the statement there and if I did it would not mean what it implies in the article, that Drusus achieved a permanent security of the Rhine-Danube border against the Suebi on the other side. So, I am taking the liberty of changing a couple of words to make it fit.
1711:
could argue that
Tacitus is being oversimple in being overelaborate. This seems rather indirect to me. Now, the reference is on the oversimplification. What oversimplification? You have not in any way said and so the reader has to read the 2 volumes to find out what you mean. Unfortunately they are in German, so he has to learn German. We expect too much of him, don't you think? Moreover, the volumes are presented as "The modern view." Oh really? Is there any other or is it all there in those two volumes? Do they present one view or many? By what world-wide authority did it get to be "the"? This is really a weasel word, isn't it? You are trying to weasel out of saying anything.
2060:
then move the classical information into more logical sections such as concerning maybe origins, locations, tribes and a I think definitely a section on classical historical events involving the Suebi. In the longer run of course more secondary sources would be desirable, but as with any such classical subject known only from a few classical snippets, it can be helpful to improve a poor article by first building a foundation which recognizes those snippets. (The secondary literature in classical subjects is enormous but a very mixed bag. So starting with that can make it hard to think straight.)--
2166:*swē- meaning "one's own" is very manipulative, because it is EXACTLY the same word in slavic languages. I can say that it originates from slavic root *swē- meaning "one's own". But it is still not a reason to delete Proto-Germanic version, is it? I think that banning and slowing down information gathering about this topic will surely not solve it. You should be either more interested in this topic, try to know how the world (or at least Europe) looks like, or slow down and re-think your delete actions.
2996:"The Rhine arises from the Celtic Alps, just outside of Raetia, and heading in a westerly direction it divides Γαλατία and its inhabitants on the left bank from the Κελτοί on the right bank, and in the end, it flows into the Ocean. This has always been considered the boundary, at least since the names of these peoples came to be differentiated; for in the very remote past, both peoples dwelling on either side of the river were called Κελτοί. It was at this point in time, then, that Caesar became the
200:
1494:
formed their observations and beliefs, so we can't just drop it from the classics and from modern
English. I understand why you don't like it as it has all sorts of unscientific and often deadly connotations and denotations and is vague and imprecise. Nevertheless we use it and so did the ancients. So any identity is likely to be a "race" or a "people" or a "tribe" on any basis whatever and it is up to us to figure out what they meant. We can't just excise ethnic from English.
537:
516:
1639:
Tacitus' Germania. I don't think we are neglecting the problems in the sources. Its nothing new. They've always been there. Tacitus' remarks have been passing around for a couple of thousand years. You fail to present enough detail to make your assertions anything more than your opinion on
Tacitus. And anyway anyone who reads the Germania from the beginning is already tipped off by Tacitus himself that he does not have a consistent picture.
918:
897:
851:
343:
833:
322:
547:
2567:
about this? (By the way for anyone wondering about the Franks, it was stated in classical sources that at least two of the border tribes were descended from the Chatti, and the others were apparently mixed within alliances with the
Cherusci for a while.) If my remark here is easier to source for "Irminones" than for "Suebi" then the question of the notability for this article still does not go away?--
254:
233:
2253:
well: these Slavic populations did not move west. Connection of the Suevi to Slavs is strictly a folk etymology. The other tribes entering Iberia during the collapse of Roman authority were all
Germanic peoples, including Goths, Vandals (Andalusia). The Suevi have a likely connection to Swabia, then pronounced by the people as something like "swabben" The modern German pronunciation of
432:
411:
3279:" and contrasts it with the distinction between Celts and Germani he says Caesar originated. He says that even after Caesar, even when Greek authors were clearly aware of the distinction or even mentioned it, "most Greek writers did not take Caesar's categories too seriously and that they conceived of the Celts in the West, and Scythians in the East right up to Late Antiquity". --
2030:, that met the year 589, the visigothic king expressed about the recent conversion of its kingdom: "Nec enim sola Gothorum conversio ad cumulum nostrae mercedis accessit, quin immo et Suevorum gentis infinita multitudo, quam praesidio caelesti nostro regno subiecimus." That is, king Reccared celebrates not only the conversion of the Goths, but also of an infinite number of Suevi.
1128:
1107:
191:
442:
1138:
988:
2742:
3214:
The point of this particular sentence is simply concerning the habits of terminology of Greek writers, and it is not up to us as WP editors to decide on this. It seems you are also personally interested to know who the proper Celts "really" but I think this is a different question and probably one we
3206:
Besides, the links you have sent me are the ones I would have sent you to argue my case, namely, that Diodorus and Strabo, both with access to Posidonius' work, knew all too well that the Celts, the original Celts, who called themselves Celts, were in southern France, which is "west of the Alps", not
3078:
say that this is just an artificial term the Romans use. That's not in conflict our article. See the first sentence of the article and page 59. Your article uses the term "Greek tradition" 4 times. There is a tradition before Caesar, and then from Strabo onwards. Dio "creates something new out of the
3046:
Can you please keep your posts short and clear, and keep all discussion about one point within one sub-section? (You are currently posting in two sub-sections and I think you created both at almost the same time?) To me it looks like you are interested in discussing much more about this topic than we
1811:
Tacitus makes no such implication and the on-line Britannica - what we can see of it without buying - does not mention the topic. As for the Swedish ref, most of us can't read that so I don't know what it does say. If it says Tacitus says these tribes "come from" the the Suebi in the narrow sense, it
1609:
I'm having trouble following you, Wetman, but I will reply to what you seem to mean. Whether or not Germania is an exhortation IS an opinion. The question is whether it is exclusively your opinion. If it is, then it is either basic knowledge that does not need a reference or it is not. I deny that it
1368:
Agreed. This article is being anonymously rewritten. "Elbe-Germanic" is a linguistic category—and not a widely-used category at that (Google it!). Its application to identify a historical population needs to be introduced for the general reader. New edits show a tenuous control of English: "Sueve" is
1234:
Polish is not an easy language for Germans to learn, and it is hardly unique to Poles to see foreigners struggling with the local language and having strange ways of life to be seen as "dumb", and it's easy to understand that people who seem awkward in adapting to the linguistic ways of a new land to
3077:
Note that our article does not say how long the tradition lasted, and what different versions of it existed, and in that respect your article is quite clear that there was a strong Greek tradition until at least Strabo. After Strabo however the new tradition was to accept the term Germanoi, but just
3074:
Roman authors working in Latin quickly—and universally—adopted the Caesarian creation of the Germani. Greek writers, rather more constrained by a well-established and conservative tradition, were slower to accommodate Caesar’s apologetic ethnography and integrate this ἔθνος into their understandings
2935:
A bit difficult to follow your reasoning. The quotes you found make it clear that he literally said they were Celts. You seem to be arguing as if this term Celt was a kind of exact translation of Germani for him? So does he ONLY use the word Celt to refer to Germani? Does he for example never use it
3031:
This as it stands is a complete inversion of reality. Not only is there no such tradition, and not only was Cassius Dio not in any way a possible example of such tradition, it is most importantly disingenuous to say "this Ancient Greek author (who I won't tell you did not think the Germani existed,
2636:
Sorry but apparently I phrased my question badly. Just for the sake of getting it on record for future consideration: 1. I think your explanation is also not quite right. Germanic is a branch of the European family of Indo-European languages, so it presumably came into being as a dialect, in Europe
2566:
This question seems to me to be something suggested in some sources, but I can't quickly think of one that says it outright. If it is true or even thought to be likely, then it would be very notable and even deserving note in the first sentences. Does anyone else know of any sources which are clear
1710:
What it seems to say is exactly the opposite of what the scholars think. They think Tacitus has too many tribes in the Suebi. Thus Tacitus' view is not over-simple but over-elaborate, implying that the scholars have a view yet more elaborate of which Tacitus' is an oversimplification. I suppose you
1662:
I can't see how you can draw that conclusion. No, I don't take Tacitus at face value. I repeat, Tacitus himself pointed out the inconsistencies in his information. They have always been there and have always been considered with the widest possible spectrum of viewpoint. There is no new information
1619:
One last thing. This has been building up for some time has it not? We've often been in each other's sphere of interest ever since I got on Knowledge 1.5 years ago, and you were one of the very first to demand references and get my first article deleted out of hand. You did that before I even had a
1555:
Objection your honor! The prosecutor is leading the witness! In the first place we have no idea at all what you mean by hortatory essay. And second, how can you say what it was intended for? That is a long and arduous task of scholarship for which you have not given a source. If it is your opinion,
1508:
root *swe-. Some related English words are: sibling, sister, swain, self, ethnic." Why? In this list the derivation of "ethnos" from PIE *swe- is remote enough to distract the ordinary reader— while goosing the well-informed amateur PIE linguist with a little self-congratulatory flush. I deleted it
1389:
No text of 569 mentions "Nord-Schwaben", as the reader is being told. The reader is being given someone's POV reading, with dates adding a tone of credibility. A sounder approach: to identify the Chronicle entry then quote it, and then to report on the usual inference drawn from the brief chronicle
3021:
on it - and that not only he may not be used as "an example of Ancient Greek who calls people north of the Alps Celts", he may also not be used as "an example of an Ancient Geek author who considers the Suebi Celts" since he is specifically the one Ancient Greek author who does not consider anyone
2161:
like varit=barit (cook/boil/... in slavic). In today Slovak dialects i have seen only L=W. But by looking on some words (like barit=varit) you can see, that in the past V and B were also swapped. Also S and (english) SH can be swapped. Summary: L=W, V=B, S=SH. You can also look at inter-slavic and
2059:
working on this article in a non-random way. The classical sources section has been improved but I guess many people will agree with me that such a summary of every primary source is not really a great way to approach this subject on WP. But my idea is to start with what we have, get it right, and
1920:
Please stop edit warring. I appreciate that a new map is included, showing both Suebian areas at once, in Portugal and at the Rhine, but then huge a "one size fits all" map that covers half of Africa and Asia, too, is a temporary solution at best. Please crop to relevant area, cutting non-relevant
1493:
Hello Wetman. This is just a theoretical observation; I don't yet see where it impacts the article seriously, but "ethnic" even though you don't like it has a fairly concrete meaning in English and often nothing else will do. The classical writers certainly believed in it and used it often, and it
2263:
is consistent with Schwab-i, with the "S" representing the early German sound, and "u" as the usual Latin depiction of a "w"-like sound where it still existed. "e" was much more common following "u" in Spanish, and vowels are infamously unstable. "a" going to "e" in early Spanish dialects can be
2165:
If you dont agree with something, it doesnt mean that you should remove it. There were also other sources besides the one you criticised. I have not seen any reason to delete that article. There was nothing worser than in other articles. I could say that originating Suevi from Proto-Germanic root
2141:
As Slovak i can confirm that word Suav/Suev is the same as Slav. I can not say that anciet Slavs(Suevi) are the same nation(or sub-nation) as present day Slavs(Suavi). But it is clear, that it is the same name. Surely more clear than English=Angles. Present day Russians arent considered to be old
1451:
The statement is made that the Suebi remained a threat until Drusus secured the frontier. I can't imagine what that can mean; it is an oversimplification by far. Which Suebi did he secure it against? Troubles on the Suebian border went on and on right to the end of the empire. The gains of Drusus
723:
the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be
3271:
Woolf in the Gruen book says "Greek writers struggled to contain a wide range of groups with the category Keltoi, which originally seems to have encompassed all peoples north of the Mediterranean and west of Scythia". For our purposes here it is relevant to point out that the equivalence between
2252:
There was much Slavic settlement in what is now Germany, mostly in the lands that became the former DDR. Cities with names such as Chemtitz, Zwickau, and Leipzig attest to Slavic populations. The House of Mecklenburg was originally Slavic. Even Berlin was originally a Slavic settlement! But note
1901:
Mr Andrarias, have you actually looked at the maps, or are you just sockpuppeting for Srnec? They show the location of Suebian Kingdom, along with other nations. What's wrong with that? I'll be replacing them with zoomed-in versions soon, but for now I have to waste time with bigoted editors who
1638:
Why would the caution be any greater now than it ever was? Are you trying to say the students should not necessarily take it at face value? That's an editorial opinion and is not necessary. If the topic is the unreliability of Tacitus' Germania it seems to me you would want to take that up under
3247:
If "The point of this particular sentence is simply concerning the habits of terminology of Greek writers" then that point is not being made here. Asserting something is not making the point. The sentence asserts something for which there is actually no consensus. Cassius Dio is one author, not
1326:
of Serbia in the Balkans, the two tribes separated when another moved south in the 7th century AD. For the Germanic Suebi to have a partial Slavic component if not by similar enonyms is in need for further investigation before any inclusion of my ethnological theory, it's what I have in mind. +
3210:
Besides, the very first mentions of Celts, from Herodotus and Hecataeus, mention Celts even more western of southern France, within Iberia. So, certainly it is at least doubtful, pending evidence, that such a "tradition" of "ancient Greeks calling people north of the alps Celts" ever existed.
3202:
Hi Andrew. The reason I pre-empt this and say this can't be confirmed is simply that I have never read a paper where the conclusion was "the ancient Greeks had a tradition of labelling all barbarian people north of the alps as Celtic". Certainly Cassius Dio had that "tradition", but a one-man
1401:
I would not use the modern German word "Schwaben" as some readers might confuse it with some of the inhabitants of the modern German states of Baden-Württemberg and Bavaria. Furthermore, to use "Schwaben" in the context of the 6th century or earlier is unhistoric. It would be better to use an
2125:
Just a quick note to say that I removed a paragraph suggesting that Suebians were Slavs, and that the language of the Suebians is unknown, etc. For example compare to our language version, which is sourced. (And just using common sense, Adam of Bremen is hardly a good source for a striking
1587:
classical source: in removing that fact, Dave Botteville says "What about Caesar, Strabo, Pliny and Ptolemy?" Yes indeed! Let their passing references be added by David Botteville, then, in a footnote: they have not yet appeared anywhere in this article. The article's footnotes are a bit
1436:
The following is incomprehensible without some enlarging: " included all North Germanic and East Germanic tribes that were not directly annexed by the Romans, but this was due to a misunderstanding." What misunderstanding? What then were the actual facts, according to modfern historians?
2936:
to refer to people living in Gaul? My understanding is that several Greek writers simply didn't make a strong distinction between Celts and Germani, but this does not mean they did not use the term Celts to refer to the people of central Gaul (like Caesar did). See for example 39.49.
1356:
I would say "Suevi", but if not that, "Suebi". I wouldn't use Sueve or Suebic, but I've never before seen Sueve, and what do I know? What is the basis for the massive edits by a recent unnamed user? I have a feeling many should be reverted and some info retained and rewritten.
2264:
explained by the commonness of "ue" in Spanish and the scarcity of "ua". "b" and "v" have been confused in Iberia as a whole since Roman imperial times. The final "i" is a Latin plural for nouns in the nominative, and the tribe was known in a way to fit Latin norms in writing.
2955:
And 53.12 "For some of the Celts, whom we call Germans, had occupied all the Belgic territory along the Rhine and caused it to be called Germany". So the Germani are a subset of the Celts and the idea of saying they are not Celts is an innovation he does not always follow.
1578:
directed to Romans, not the supposed geographical and ethnological treatise for which the hundred-year-old pop references still being quoted in this article would mine it (following Th. Mommsen, I understand). I think we could unclench a little and let the information
1529:
indicates that it is a reconstruction. Dave informs us "You don't need the postulated; all IE roots are reconstructions, which is designated in linguistics by the *. Nothing is being asserted or 'postulated.'" Needless to say. But there's no reason to hang on quite so
2019:. It was a catholic council celebrated the Spanish Era 610, i.e. 572 A.D., under king Miro. Here is the headline "CONCILIUM BRACARENSE SECUNDUM DUODECIM EPISCOPORUM habitum anno secundo regis Mironis, die Kalendarum Iuniarum, aera DCX." So, the first council is
3047:
need to discuss concerning these couple of sentences in our WP article here. The talk page should not be used as a discussion forum for people generally interested in the topic. (Maybe we it would be a good thing to have a forum page for some articles!)
1680:
goose; often, I find, it's the only kindly way. More seriously, I added the following quite sensible note, deleted by Dave Botteville: "The modern view of the Suebi is laid out in two volumes stemming from papers delivered at a series of seminars at
1313:
The tribal names (etymology) for Suebis and Swedes are identical, their homeland was along the German Baltic coasts and perhaps are connected with Sweden by Jutland (Denmark) and the island of Bornholm. But to think about the Suebi may have possible
1993:. And a wiser head than mine could begin each edit perfectly fresh, not letting irritants from utterly unrelated editing encounters accumulate in unwarranted suspicions. You've nicely accepted my apologies before. I hope you'll do so now again, --
2987:"For some of the Celts, whom we now call Germans, had occupied all the Belgic territory along the Rhine and caused it to be called Germania..." (Book 53, chapter 12) (i.e. first they were Celts east of Rhine, then they changed their name)
2915:
Therefore the Knowledge article on the Suebi is currently misleading the audience by having them believe that Dio Cassius was saying that the Suebi were Celts, when clearly to him the word just meant German, since to him Keltike meant
2943:"This river has always down to the present time been considered the boundary, ever since these tribes gained their different names; for very anciently p383 both peoples dwelling on either side of the river were called Celts."--
1289:
The Svear of Sweden and the Suevi/Suebi/Suabi were all closely related Germanic people. What evidence or probability exists of the Suevi and the Svear being identical, i.e., a single tribe, during the first few centuries A.D.?
3032:
but rather considered them to be either Celts or Scythians) thought the Suebi were Celts" because it does not really mean what most of the audience will hear when you under-explain it this way you currently have.
2082:
I do not trust this sentence after reading some information and understanding the naming of localities of supposed suebi origin. The suebi inhabited rural areas, not urban ones, as the article is trying to hint.
2416:
In Galicia there are different villages with names ending in IZ, like Allariz and Beariz (Ourense) and Mondariz (Pontevedra), which origin comes from the Swebian tribe. Allaritz, Bearitz, Mondaritz....like
2169:
Another indication of slavic presence in central Europe (and connection with Suevi) could be Iazyges. Iazyk means tongue/language in slavic languages. Suevi=Slavi article on this discussion page is really
153:
728:
statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this
2966:
Reading Cassius Dio makes it clear he is avoiding calling the Germani by that name, and that the Celts to him are mainly an old western people who decided to call themselves Germani east of the Rhine:
2972:"This land is separated from the mainland of Keltike by fifty and four hundred stadia at the shortest distance, and extends by almost all of Gaul and Iberia..." (Book 39, Dindorf-Stephanus page 13)
2892:"Dio's name for Germany proper is Κελτική; when he uses the name Γερμανία, as here, he refers to the provinces of that name, Germania Superior and Germania Inferior, both lying west of the Rhine."
3272:"Celt" and "Galatian" is a similar but distinct topic. Perhaps we could say "Celts or Gauls", but in modern English these are both considered "Celtic", which is the word we are currently using.
3028:"Nevertheless, Cassius Dio wrote that the Suebi, who dwelt across the Rhine, were called Celts. This may follow a Greek tradition of labelling all barbarian people north of the Alps as Celtic."
1390:
entry. Once the "Sueve" (!) warbands split up, two threads have to be separately traced, in Germany and in Galicia. This article needs professionalizing: out of my competence, to be sure. --
3338:
3072:
The article your cite is interesting but completely in line with our article, which is not about Dio specifically, or about any attempt to go further than the post Strabo tradition. It says
304:
294:
2466:
742:
2807:
3343:
1663:
leading to new suspicions and no need to caution the reader that now, as opposed to some theoretically credulous past, we have to be even more careful than ever in suspecting Tacitus.
1216:
Poles refer to all Germans "Shvabs" or "Shkops", (both terms being extremely derogatory); not just to Ukrainian ones, of whom knowledge in Poland is practically non - existent.
3323:
3005:"And so, the Dacians and Suebi fought against each other in great numbers. These ones are Celts, while those are, in a certain way, Scythians." (Book 51, chapter 22, section 6)
1071:
1044:
1034:
270:
3333:
1019:
2476:
1267:
Schwabenland kommt nur einmal in einem Gedicht vor ,da war ein Herr aus Schwabenland, von hohem Wuchs und starker Hand'. Ist also dem Reim geschuldet und nicht historisch.
1238:
Now for a more relevant question: are the Suebi in any way connected to Schwabenland (Swabia), a former region of Germany now split between Bavaria and Baden-Wurttenburg?
3135:
This is commonly discussed in secondary sources, so a footnote can be added. Asking for a footnote is fine, but why do you pre-empt this and say this can't be confirmed?--
2622:
around the 1st century AD. In that sense one can say that the Suebi brought Germanic languages to this part of continental Europe. This is already mentioned in the lead.
1049:
1039:
2835:
However, searching Roman Histories by Cassius Dio online (freely available here: penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Cassius_Dio/ ) returns no such excerpt.
266:
261:
238:
3408:
3398:
3058:
Great. Our article also doesn't take that position, so no changes are needed? If you have any concrete proposal about changes to the article what would they be?--
2508:
2504:
2490:
2362:
2358:
2344:
968:
958:
863:
1084:
147:
1950:, however, places the Suebic conversion later and ascribes it, not to a Suebe, but to a Visigoth, placing it alongside that of the Goths, which occurred under
265:, a group of contributors interested in Knowledge's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our
1649:
Why would the caution be any greater now than it ever was? I don't know about "the student" but apparently Dave Botteville does take Tacitus at face value. --
862:, a collaborative effort to improve Knowledge's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please
3313:
2978:"Augustus also subdued the Astures and Cantabrians, Celtic nations..." (Book 44, chapter 42) and "He subdued both Keltike and Britain…" (Book 44, chapter 43)
3413:
2079:"The Germanic invaders settled mainly in the areas of Braga (Bracara Augusta), Porto (Portus Cale), Lugo (Lucus Augusti) and Astorga (Asturica Augusta)."
2467:
https://web.archive.org/web/20110809064309/http://www.indoeuropean.nl/cgi-bin/startq.cgi?flags=endnnnl&root=leiden&basename=%5Cdata%5Cie%5Cpokorny
3383:
3328:
1029:
593:
79:
2142:
russian vikings, but they still use their name. Present day English arent clean Angles, but it is the same name. Same for Macedonians, Bulgarians, ... .
3353:
3308:
3014:
Cassius Dio is a special case in his almost-complete avoidance of the term "Germani" (he only uses it once and it is when he quotes Emperor Augustus).
603:
383:
3423:
3393:
1194:
1184:
1080:
934:
652:
The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere. The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo.
393:
204:
3403:
3368:
3318:
2687:
Some guy just edited the beginning of the article to interpret the Suebi as Moors. Can we put the article under protection from future vandalism?
2470:
1235:
quite talking. The proverb that it is wiser to stay silent and seem stupid than to open one's mouth and leave all doubt is not strictly American.
488:
933:, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1956:
John of Biclarum might not be any more credible than Isidore of Seville, but wise readers of Knowledge don't neglect to read the Talk pages. --
3388:
2189:
Lots of words sound like words in other languages. Knowledge is not a place for publishing our own ideas, but ones which have been published.--
858:
838:
498:
3428:
3358:
2882:"Dio regularly uses the word "Celts" in place of "Germans"; to avoid confusion, however, the usual term has been adopted in the translation."
2033:
So, I would say that John Blicarense's Chronica is second hand to this conversion, thought it is a primary and reliable source for the time.
1268:
1254:
754:
85:
1689:, (Göttingen) 1989, 1992." Even skimming the English-language reviews of the two volumes would bring one up to speed. Well, almost anyone.--
3373:
2876:"and together against each other the Dacians and the Suebi fought. And these are indeed Celts, while those are in some manner Scythians."
2477:
https://web.archive.org/web/20071025144447/http://www.koeblergerhard.de/germanistischewoerterbuecher/indogermanischeswoerterbuch/idgS.pdf
2418:
992:
925:
902:
569:
2800:
3378:
3188:
I fail to see how the links you showed me corroborate your idea. Rather, I see them obviously arguing my point, as I explained above.
1328:
1160:
359:
3241:
Unless you can point to a paper that concluded "the Ancient Greeks called people north of the Alps Celts", then how can you say that?
2771:
3418:
3348:
3120:
However, no such tradition can be confirmed. Otherwise, I would recommend adding a source, or removing this statement for accuracy.
2486:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
2107:
2868:
2480:
464:
2937:
1570:, not here: I haven't looked at that article recently, but it is not news, even to an amateur like me, that Tacitus' purpose in
3363:
3303:
3050:
This long new post just repeats the same position with more words, as if you have not read our previous posts? Your own words:
2743:
Bronze figure of Suebi male captive with bound hands; circular base. Culture period Gallo Roman term details British Museum.jpg
99:
30:
560:
521:
104:
20:
1592:: the remark that "Suebi" covers a large number of tribes in central Germany is supported by a 1912 annotation of a line in
2905:"and moreover Dacians and Suebi fought in crowds with one another. The latter are Germans, the former Scythians of a sort."
1151:
1112:
350:
327:
74:
44:
2456:
2815:
2782:
2753:
2551:
2322:
1505:
715:
707:
213:
3267:
Did you look at the sources I cited? I should mention that I found these very quickly, and could have given many more.
2015:
Well, I`m a little upset now -and when I say little I mean it-. Recently I modified the article, adding a reference to
2862:"καὶ ἀθρόοι πρὸς ἀλλήλους Δακοί τε καὶ Σουῆβοι ἐμαχέσαντο. εἰσὶ δὲ οὗτοι μὲν Κελτοί, ἐκεῖνοι δὲ δὴ Σκύθαι τρόπον τινά"
2660:
455:
416:
65:
1886:
Mr Talessman: what your map's contribution? There are better executed and more precise maps already in the article.
1777:
Tacitus hypothesized that other tribes emanated from it, such as the Quadi and the Marcomanni and probably also the
168:
3284:
3220:
3178:
3140:
3091:
3063:
2957:
2948:
2707:
2642:
2572:
2232:
2194:
2131:
2065:
1868:
1733:
1682:
1227:"Shvab" is probably "Szwab", likely from German "Schwab", a demonym for people from Scwabenland (German -- English
1732:
The modern view of the Suebi is laid out in two volumes stemming from papers delivered at a series of seminars at
135:
1635:", but it is now read with increasing caution for its passing remarks on geography and ethnology; nevertheless,"
1258:
2507:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
2361:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
2896:
2886:
2471:
http://www.indoeuropean.nl/cgi-bin/startq.cgi?flags=endnnnl&root=leiden&basename=%5Cdata%5Cie%5Cpokorny
1272:
686:
3253:
3193:
3125:
3037:
2924:
2843:
2692:
3017:
In summary, it is clear that Cassius Dio is attempting to erase the Germani from existence - there is even a
2422:
3235:
There is no consensus on this supposed fact that "the Ancient Greeks called people north of the Alps Celts".
2811:
2778:
2749:
2542:
2448:
693:
109:
3117:
Although, this may follow a Greek tradition of labelling all barbarian people north of the alps as Celtic.
2879:
However, the University of Chicago includes a note in translating Dio Cassius' Roman histories, which says:
1676:
No doubt we all feel more memorable than we really are: I'm sure I do. So I try to treat every goose as a
2940:
2909:
2444:
1332:
1006:
3249:
3189:
3121:
3033:
2920:
2839:
2688:
2562:
Are the Suebi the peoples who brought Germanic languages to modern Germanic speaking continental regions?
1381:. In connection to the Suebi Saxons and Langobards (Lombards) returning from Italy in 573, are mentioned.
3280:
3216:
3174:
3136:
3087:
3059:
2952:
2944:
2703:
2638:
2568:
2526:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
2514:
2400:
2380:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
2368:
2228:
2190:
2127:
2111:
2061:
219:
3229:"The point of this particular sentence is simply concerning the habits of terminology of Greek writers"
2651:
Thanks for the explanation. Perhaps you would be able to explain the difference between inhabitants of
2447:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
129:
3025:
Currently when Google is searched for "Cassius Dio" "Celts" "Suebi" it summarizes from Knowledge thus:
2041:
2272:
1239:
190:
3018:
2856:" Suebi fought in throngs with each other. The latter are Celts, the former a species of Scythian."
2276:
2145:
Its the same for Suobeni=Suoveni=Sloveni, Slovak=Suouak, Slavian=Shwabian. In some Slovak dialects
2036:
Accordingly, I`m changing again the article, trying to be respectfull with other editors choices.--
1922:
1907:
1891:
1243:
161:
55:
1159:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
568:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
463:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
358:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
125:
2902:
And thus the University of Chicago translates the same passage using "German" instead of "Celts":
2583:
2214:
2178:
2088:
1925:
1844:
1757:
1473:
They remained a threat to the Romans at the Rhine until Drusus the Elder secured the border 9 BC.
70:
2511:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
2365:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
2869:
https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=51.22.6&fromdoc=Perseus%3Atext%3A2008.01.0593
2832:
Nevertheless, Cassius Dio wrote that the Suebi, who dwelt across the Rhine, were called Celts.
2767:
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
2738:
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
2527:
2381:
1322:-speaking inhabitants of modern-day Saxony in eastern Germany. They are closely related to the
2838:
Pending the actual quote that justifies this assertion, I suggest it be removed for accuracy.
2721:
2668:
2627:
2481:
http://www.koeblergerhard.de/germanistischewoerterbuecher/indogermanischeswoerterbuch/idgS.pdf
2304:
2016:
1805:
1552:"as it was intended as a hortatory essay for a Roman public that set up cultural polarities,"
724:
listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are
51:
3155:
2938:
https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=39.49&fromdoc=Perseus%3Atext%3A2008.01.0593
1478:
It's referenced, so if you disagree it's better that you find a source that also disagrees.--
175:
3166:
2595:
2396:
2023:
the only contemporary record, and there is some evolution from the first to the second one.
1998:
1961:
1947:
1222:
782:
2534:
2388:
1971:
I think the deletions were accidental. The text is in there now, albeit in bulletted form.
1377:(northern Suebi) were mentioned in 569 under Frankish king Siegbert I. in areas of today's
1219:
The official slavonic name for Germans - Nemce, or Niemcy meant: "mutes" or "dumb people".
2587:
2312:
2037:
2027:
1976:
1813:
1712:
1664:
1640:
1621:
1567:
1557:
1495:
1453:
1060:
552:
536:
515:
355:
2227:
if you think I am misunderstanding Knowledge policy about what sources are appropriate.--
1441:
2796:
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
1921:
parts. Also, the spelling "Alammania" is new to me (and Albania at the Kaspian Sea). --
2656:
2493:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
2347:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
1903:
1887:
1315:
1143:
679:
2533:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
2457:
https://web.archive.org/web/20110518012642/http://www.sofi.se/images/NA/pdf/urnord.pdf
2387:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
2223:
As already mentioned, the sources are few, and not appropriate. You can raise this on
3297:
2323:
https://web.archive.org/20131014171959/http://www.sofi.se/servlet/GetDoc?meta_id=1017
2224:
2210:
2174:
2084:
1945:
The following sourced information might be valuable, though it's been deleted twice:
1862:
1378:
3086:. Isn't that all our article needs for the two sentences you are concerned about?--
3082:
within which he was working" (p.68). On page 68 your article literally refers to a
2717:
2664:
2623:
930:
917:
896:
719:: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are
447:
141:
3056:"Did he imply with that to say that they were "Celts, as opposed to Germani"? No."
3248:"academic consensus on what the Ancient Greeks called people north of the Alps".
2326:
1465:
De förblev ett hot mot romarna vid Rhen tills Drusus d.ä. säkrade gränsen 9 f.kr.
3011:
Did he imply with that to say that they were "Celts, as opposed to Germani"? No.
2777:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —
2748:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —
2652:
2603:
2500:
2354:
1994:
1957:
1793:
1690:
1650:
1597:
1535:
1438:
1403:
1391:
1347:
1299:
850:
832:
2607:
2499:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
2460:
2353:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
1972:
1951:
1778:
1479:
1422:
1358:
1319:
1133:
542:
437:
342:
321:
2663:, and my efforts to explain this difference has so far been without success.
1566:
The "scholarship" that is news to Dave Botteville should be referenced under
2897:
https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Cassius_Dio/53*.html#ref4
2887:
https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Cassius_Dio/38*.html#ref9
1786:
1534:
to information that may orient the Knowledge reader through this thought. --
1026:
Articles about ethnic groups that currently have issues needing resolution:
431:
410:
2919:
Therefore I advise changing the current highlighted excerpt for accuracy.
1504:
The reader may wonder at this! I had removed "ethnic" from the remark "...
1127:
1106:
1020:
Resolve the disparity in importance rankings among different ethnic groups
253:
232:
2611:
2103:
1782:
929:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to
661:
565:
2309:
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add
1298:
and their sources (dates are important), and leave the question open? --
2941:
https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Cassius_Dio/39*.html
2910:
https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Cassius_Dio/51*.html
2763:
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
2734:
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
2599:
1156:
2659:/Scandinavian languages? There is an ongoing discussion about this at
2126:
etymological proposal that the word Suebian is the same as Slavian.)--
987:
2209:
doesnt look like an "opinion". It was mostly summary of references.--
2205:
Referenced writers probably wrote (published) something. Majority of
1838:
1789:, but whether the latter group were part of the Suebi is doubtful.
1751:
1228:
666:
1155:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of
2702:
Seems a very small incident, and not worthy of emergency action?--
2619:
2615:
2591:
2440:
2317:
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
2294:
1323:
460:
24:
3154:
Erich S. Gruen, Cultural Identity in the Ancient Mediterranean,
2618:
etc (who were part of the Suebi) settled there at the expense of
1989:
Thanks, Srnec. I should count to a hundred before using the verb
1895:
2792:
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
1902:
think they are wiki-gods because they get to be anonymous here.
1801:
1797:
1054:
3238:
My point here has nothing to do with who the Celts really were.
3084:"Greek tradition" "in which there exist only Σκύθαι and Κελτοί"
2267:
The Spanish would have later encounters with Slavic people as
2153:. In combination with other vowels it creates uo, ua, ue, ui.
2055:
In case anyone is wondering. I do not have lots of time but I
1318:
is another possibility to rule out. The Sorbs or Sorbians are
184:
15:
1736:
in 1986 and 1987, Günther Neumann and Henning Seemann, eds.,
1685:
in 1986 and 1987, Günther Neumann and Henning Seemann, eds.,
1513:
that was being made. As to Dave Botteville's other deletion,
3052:"So, did he literally call the Suebi Celts? Yes, literally."
2993:
Establishing that before Caesar, Germani were called Keltoi:
2984:
Establishing the Celts east of Rhine are now called Germans:
2332:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
3288:
3257:
3224:
3197:
3182:
3144:
3129:
3095:
3067:
3041:
2961:
2928:
2847:
2819:
2786:
2757:
2725:
2711:
2696:
2672:
2646:
2631:
2576:
2556:
2426:
2408:
2280:
2236:
2218:
2198:
2182:
2135:
2115:
2092:
2069:
2045:
2002:
1980:
1965:
1932:
1911:
1816:
1715:
1693:
1667:
1653:
1643:
1624:
1600:
1560:
1538:
1498:
1482:
1456:
1425:
1406:
1394:
1361:
1350:
1336:
1302:
1276:
1262:
1247:
269:. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our
3156:
https://books.google.be/books?id=G-OYdFG8wswC&pg=PA261
3008:
So, did he literally call the Suebi Celts? Yes, literally.
2865:
Which is Cassius Dio, Roman Histories, 51.22.6, from here:
2451:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
1369:
not the adjectival form: "Suebic" is. Take the following:
1253:
the german name of the region is Schwaben NOT Schwabenland
3167:
https://books.google.be/books?id=EK8HEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA44
771:
2293:
I have just added archive links to one external link on
2106:
is called Suebenheim. Mannheim is located near Rhine. --
1707:
Modern historians consider this an over-simplification.
2298:
2206:
810:
806:
638:
633:
628:
623:
1804:
would make some of them cross the Rhine and reach the
160:
2586:
were initially brought to continental Europe by the
1072:
Knowledge:WikiProject Ethnic groups/Article requests
1045:
Category:Ethnic groups articles needing reassessment
1035:
Category:Ethnic groups articles needing merge action
564:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
459:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
354:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
2853:
I found the original quote from the book. It reads:
2503:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
2357:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
1632:PS: the rest of it does not make any sense either:
3161:Steinacher, "Rome and its created northerners" in
1346:Which is the better adjectival form in English? --
3339:Low-importance Classical Greece and Rome articles
2594:. Germanic languages were however not brought to
2162:slavic-german and local differences in languages.
1738:Beiträge zum Verständnis der Germania des Tacitus
1687:Beiträge zum Verständnis der Germania des Tacitus
1050:Category:Ethnic groups articles needing attention
1040:Category:Ethnic groups articles needing infoboxes
2825:Did Cassius Dio say the Suebi were called Celts?
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
3344:All WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome pages
279:Knowledge:WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome
3275:Steinacher writes about a "Greek ethnographic
2806:Participate in the deletion discussion at the
2489:This message was posted before February 2018.
2343:This message was posted before February 2018.
2327:http://www.sofi.se/servlet/GetDoc?meta_id=1017
2011:The Second Council of Braga and The Conversion
282:Template:WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome
1016:of articles within the scope of this project.
174:
8:
1856:
1854:
1417:the link of Drusus must be "de-ambuguiated"
3324:Knowledge level-5 vital articles in History
2461:http://www.sofi.se/images/NA/pdf/urnord.pdf
1781:. The Suebi tribal group also included the
1431:
3334:B-Class Classical Greece and Rome articles
3054:Great, that's what you previously denied.
2102:It should be mentioned that a district of
1101:
1030:Category:Unassessed Ethnic groups articles
976:
891:
827:
611:
510:
405:
316:
227:
2439:I have just modified 3 external links on
1832:
1830:
1525:all know, that the asterisk in front of
3002:Now let's re-read what is being argued:
2999:first of the Romans to cross the Rhine.
2975:Establishing Keltike = Gaul and Iberia:
2969:Establishing Keltike = Gaul and Iberia:
1826:
1796:AD, the Suebi were concentrated at the
1725:
1103:
893:
829:
512:
407:
318:
229:
188:
3244:There is no source for that assertion.
3083:
3073:
3055:
3051:
2590:, which preceded the emergence of the
872:Knowledge:WikiProject Former countries
3409:Low-importance Ethnic groups articles
3399:WikiProject Former countries articles
980:WikiProject Ethnic groups open tasks:
875:Template:WikiProject Former countries
262:WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome
7:
3203:tradition isn't much of a tradition.
2257:involves regular linguistic change.
1294:Why not give your Swedish quotes of
1149:This article is within the scope of
923:This article is within the scope of
856:This article is within the scope of
656:Improve key articles to Good article
558:This article is within the scope of
453:This article is within the scope of
348:This article is within the scope of
259:This article is within the scope of
3314:Knowledge vital articles in History
943:Knowledge:WikiProject Ethnic groups
218:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
3414:WikiProject Ethnic groups articles
946:Template:WikiProject Ethnic groups
285:Classical Greece and Rome articles
14:
3384:High-importance Portugal articles
3329:B-Class vital articles in History
3232:That is my exact concern as well.
2443:. Please take a moment to review
2297:. Please take a moment to review
2051:currently working on this article
3354:High-importance Galicia articles
3309:Knowledge level-5 vital articles
2981:Now with that established, read:
1136:
1126:
1105:
986:
916:
895:
849:
831:
545:
535:
514:
440:
430:
409:
341:
320:
252:
231:
198:
189:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
3424:Mid-importance history articles
3394:B-Class former country articles
2951:) 23:53, 10 August 2024 (UTC)--
1189:This article has been rated as
963:This article has been rated as
598:This article has been rated as
493:This article has been rated as
388:This article has been rated as
299:This article has been rated as
3404:B-Class Ethnic groups articles
3369:High-importance Spain articles
3319:B-Class level-5 vital articles
3215:can't really answer anymore.--
2873:Which literally translates as:
1442:09:55, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
578:Knowledge:WikiProject Portugal
1:
3389:WikiProject Portugal articles
2801:Suebian German barbarians.jpg
2673:15:36, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
2647:21:57, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
2632:14:43, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
2237:07:55, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
2219:18:46, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
2093:18:34, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
1933:15:52, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
1912:20:16, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
1896:04:58, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
1873:, retrieved January 26, 2007.
1395:15:59, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
1248:17:07, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
1169:Knowledge:WikiProject History
1163:and see a list of open tasks.
937:and see a list of open tasks.
581:Template:WikiProject Portugal
572:and see a list of open tasks.
467:and see a list of open tasks.
368:Knowledge:WikiProject Galicia
362:and see a list of open tasks.
42:Put new text under old text.
3429:WikiProject History articles
3359:WikiProject Galicia articles
3163:Interrogating the ‘Germanic’
2772:Recumbent Suebi from Apt.jpg
2557:07:02, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
1817:15:51, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
1716:01:36, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
1694:06:56, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
1668:01:36, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
1654:00:45, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
1644:00:16, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
1625:02:26, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
1601:00:45, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
1561:23:43, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
1539:00:45, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
1499:19:48, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
1483:19:55, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
1457:19:18, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
1447:Drusus securing the frontier
1362:01:50, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
1351:00:00, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
1263:17:10, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
1172:Template:WikiProject History
859:WikiProject Former countries
716:Template:Regions of Portugal
708:Category:History of Portugal
371:Template:WikiProject Galicia
3374:All WikiProject Spain pages
3289:07:53, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
3258:05:27, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
3225:15:38, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
3198:18:08, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
3183:11:53, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
3145:11:07, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
3130:21:17, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
3110:Was there a Greek tradition
3096:08:50, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
3068:08:07, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
3042:06:21, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
2962:23:53, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
2929:22:31, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
2848:21:15, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
2820:14:51, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
2787:14:06, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
2758:13:51, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
2661:Talk:North Germanic peoples
2427:18:31, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
2409:16:13, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
2281:04:09, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
2199:18:03, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
2183:15:31, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
2017:the Second Council of Braga
1432:Tacitus' "misunderstanding"
1303:04:51, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
473:Knowledge:WikiProject Spain
50:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
3445:
2520:(last update: 5 June 2024)
2436:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
2374:(last update: 5 June 2024)
2315:|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
2290:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
2046:09:35, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
2003:01:45, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
1981:00:39, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
1966:09:14, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
1407:16:13, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
1373:Part of the Suebi, called
1337:05:25, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
1195:project's importance scale
969:project's importance scale
604:project's importance scale
499:project's importance scale
476:Template:WikiProject Spain
394:project's importance scale
305:project's importance scale
3379:B-Class Portugal articles
2726:12:36, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
2712:10:24, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
2697:23:07, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
2577:09:19, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
2136:13:44, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
2070:12:08, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
1770:Repetitious or wrong text
1740:, (Göttingen) 1989, 1992.
1509:simply to strengthen the
1188:
1121:
993:WikiProject Ethnic groups
975:
962:
926:WikiProject Ethnic groups
911:
844:
610:
597:
530:
492:
425:
387:
336:
298:
276:Classical Greece and Rome
247:
239:Classical Greece and Rome
226:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
3419:B-Class history articles
3349:B-Class Galicia articles
2413:ALLARIZ BEARIZ MONDARIZ
2116:09:56, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
1704:I removed this for now:
1285:Suevi = Sueones = Svear?
1277:14:11, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
755:Help assessing articles.
687:Coat of arms of Portugal
2432:External links modified
2286:External links modified
2028:Third Council of Toledo
1869:Encyclopædia Britannica
1462:The encyclopedia says:
1426:17:25, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
878:former country articles
3364:B-Class Spain articles
3304:B-Class vital articles
2121:Suevi = Suavi = Slavi?
1549:Removed from article:
1402:anglicised Latin form.
949:Ethnic groups articles
711:: lots to remove there
75:avoid personal attacks
2157:is often replaced by
2149:is said as (english)
205:level-5 vital article
100:Neutral point of view
3114:The article states:
2582:It appears that the
2501:regular verification
2355:regular verification
2340:to let others know.
2301:. If necessary, add
1596:Land sakes alive! --
1583:: Tacitus is indeed
1342:"Sueve" or "Suebic"?
1309:Suebi tied to Sorbi?
772:Portuguese Knowledge
561:WikiProject Portugal
105:No original research
2491:After February 2018
2345:After February 2018
2336:parameter below to
2026:Then, also, in the
1881:
1413:ambuguity of Drusus
1152:WikiProject History
1085:discuss these tasks
991:Here are some open
351:WikiProject Galicia
2990:And finally, read:
2829:The article says:
2812:Community Tech bot
2779:Community Tech bot
2750:Community Tech bot
2584:Germanic languages
2545:InternetArchiveBot
2496:InternetArchiveBot
2350:InternetArchiveBot
1845:Nordisk familjebok
1758:Nordisk familjebok
1068:Start an article:
743:Requested articles
214:content assessment
86:dispute resolution
47:
2521:
2407:
2375:
1929:
1806:Iberian Peninsula
1209:
1208:
1205:
1204:
1201:
1200:
1100:
1099:
1096:
1095:
1092:
1091:
890:
889:
886:
885:
826:
825:
822:
821:
818:
817:
803:
802:
650:Find correct name
584:Portugal articles
509:
508:
505:
504:
456:WikiProject Spain
404:
403:
400:
399:
315:
314:
311:
310:
183:
182:
66:Assume good faith
43:
3436:
3281:Andrew Lancaster
3217:Andrew Lancaster
3175:Andrew Lancaster
3137:Andrew Lancaster
3088:Andrew Lancaster
3060:Andrew Lancaster
2953:Andrew Lancaster
2945:Andrew Lancaster
2859:The original is:
2704:Andrew Lancaster
2655:and speakers of
2639:Andrew Lancaster
2596:Southern Germany
2569:Andrew Lancaster
2555:
2546:
2519:
2518:
2497:
2403:
2402:Talk to my owner
2398:
2373:
2372:
2351:
2316:
2308:
2229:Andrew Lancaster
2191:Andrew Lancaster
2128:Andrew Lancaster
2075:Settlement areas
2062:Andrew Lancaster
1948:John of Biclarum
1930:
1927:
1874:
1858:
1849:
1834:
1774:I removed this:
1762:
1747:
1741:
1730:
1177:
1176:
1175:history articles
1173:
1170:
1167:
1146:
1141:
1140:
1139:
1130:
1123:
1122:
1117:
1109:
1102:
1014:on the talk page
1011:
1005:
990:
977:
951:
950:
947:
944:
941:
920:
913:
912:
907:
899:
892:
880:
879:
876:
873:
870:
869:Former countries
864:join the project
853:
846:
845:
839:Former countries
835:
828:
645:
644:
612:
586:
585:
582:
579:
576:
555:
550:
549:
548:
539:
532:
531:
526:
518:
511:
481:
480:
477:
474:
471:
450:
445:
444:
443:
434:
427:
426:
421:
413:
406:
376:
375:
374:Galicia articles
372:
369:
366:
345:
338:
337:
332:
324:
317:
287:
286:
283:
280:
277:
256:
249:
248:
243:
235:
228:
211:
202:
201:
194:
193:
185:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
3444:
3443:
3439:
3438:
3437:
3435:
3434:
3433:
3294:
3293:
3169:pp.43-44, p. 51
3118:
3112:
3080:Greek tradition
2833:
2827:
2808:nomination page
2794:
2765:
2736:
2685:
2588:Jastorf culture
2564:
2549:
2544:
2512:
2505:have permission
2495:
2449:this simple FaQ
2434:
2406:
2401:
2366:
2359:have permission
2349:
2310:
2302:
2288:
2123:
2100:
2077:
2053:
2013:
1943:
1926:
1884:
1882:Talessman's map
1879:
1878:
1877:
1859:
1852:
1835:
1828:
1800:river, but the
1772:
1767:
1766:
1765:
1748:
1744:
1731:
1727:
1702:
1700:The modern view
1568:Germania (book)
1547:
1519:Dave Botteville
1491:
1489:The word ethnic
1449:
1434:
1415:
1344:
1311:
1287:
1269:213.165.185.130
1255:178.210.114.106
1214:
1174:
1171:
1168:
1165:
1164:
1142:
1137:
1135:
1115:
1061:Peruvian people
1009:
1003:
948:
945:
942:
939:
938:
905:
877:
874:
871:
868:
867:
814:
807:Watch this list
770:Translate from
643:
615:Portugal To-do:
600:High-importance
583:
580:
577:
574:
573:
553:Portugal portal
551:
546:
544:
525:High‑importance
524:
495:High-importance
478:
475:
472:
469:
468:
446:
441:
439:
420:High‑importance
419:
390:High-importance
373:
370:
367:
364:
363:
331:High‑importance
330:
284:
281:
278:
275:
274:
241:
212:on Knowledge's
209:
199:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
3442:
3440:
3432:
3431:
3426:
3421:
3416:
3411:
3406:
3401:
3396:
3391:
3386:
3381:
3376:
3371:
3366:
3361:
3356:
3351:
3346:
3341:
3336:
3331:
3326:
3321:
3316:
3311:
3306:
3296:
3295:
3292:
3291:
3273:
3265:
3264:
3263:
3262:
3261:
3260:
3250:KindSeriousMan
3245:
3242:
3239:
3236:
3233:
3230:
3208:
3204:
3200:
3190:KindSeriousMan
3171:
3170:
3159:
3148:
3147:
3122:KindSeriousMan
3116:
3111:
3108:
3107:
3106:
3105:
3104:
3103:
3102:
3101:
3100:
3099:
3098:
3070:
3048:
3034:KindSeriousMan
3029:
3026:
3023:
3015:
3012:
3009:
3006:
3003:
3000:
2997:
2994:
2991:
2988:
2985:
2982:
2979:
2976:
2973:
2970:
2967:
2921:KindSeriousMan
2917:
2913:
2906:
2903:
2900:
2893:
2890:
2883:
2880:
2877:
2874:
2871:
2866:
2863:
2860:
2857:
2854:
2840:KindSeriousMan
2831:
2826:
2823:
2804:
2803:
2793:
2790:
2775:
2774:
2764:
2761:
2746:
2745:
2735:
2732:
2731:
2730:
2729:
2728:
2689:Bornoutofsteel
2684:
2681:
2680:
2679:
2678:
2677:
2676:
2675:
2657:North Germanic
2563:
2560:
2539:
2538:
2531:
2484:
2483:
2475:Added archive
2473:
2465:Added archive
2463:
2455:Added archive
2433:
2430:
2399:
2393:
2392:
2385:
2330:
2329:
2321:Added archive
2287:
2284:
2250:
2249:
2248:
2247:
2246:
2245:
2244:
2243:
2242:
2241:
2240:
2239:
2171:
2167:
2163:
2143:
2122:
2119:
2099:
2096:
2076:
2073:
2052:
2049:
2012:
2009:
2008:
2007:
2006:
2005:
1984:
1983:
1942:
1939:
1938:
1937:
1936:
1935:
1915:
1914:
1904:Thomas Lessman
1883:
1880:
1876:
1875:
1850:
1825:
1824:
1820:
1771:
1768:
1764:
1763:
1742:
1724:
1723:
1719:
1701:
1698:
1697:
1696:
1673:
1672:
1671:
1670:
1657:
1656:
1630:
1629:
1628:
1627:
1614:
1613:
1612:
1611:
1604:
1603:
1546:
1545:The polarities
1543:
1542:
1541:
1490:
1487:
1486:
1485:
1476:
1475:
1474:
1468:
1467:
1466:
1448:
1445:
1433:
1430:
1429:
1428:
1414:
1411:
1410:
1409:
1398:
1397:
1386:
1385:
1384:
1383:
1365:
1364:
1343:
1340:
1316:Slavic origins
1310:
1307:
1306:
1305:
1286:
1283:
1282:
1281:
1280:
1279:
1213:
1210:
1207:
1206:
1203:
1202:
1199:
1198:
1191:Mid-importance
1187:
1181:
1180:
1178:
1161:the discussion
1148:
1147:
1144:History portal
1131:
1119:
1118:
1116:Mid‑importance
1110:
1098:
1097:
1094:
1093:
1090:
1089:
1081:edit this list
1077:
1076:
1075:
1074:
1066:
1065:
1064:
1057:
1052:
1047:
1042:
1037:
1032:
1024:
1023:
1022:
1017:
982:
981:
973:
972:
965:Low-importance
961:
955:
954:
952:
935:the discussion
921:
909:
908:
906:Low‑importance
900:
888:
887:
884:
883:
881:
854:
842:
841:
836:
824:
823:
820:
819:
816:
815:
811:Edit this list
804:
801:
800:
799:
798:
790:
789:
779:
778:
767:
766:
758:
757:
746:
745:
732:
731:
730:
712:
698:
697:
690:
683:
670:
669:
664:
642:
641:
636:
631:
626:
620:
617:
616:
608:
607:
596:
590:
589:
587:
570:the discussion
557:
556:
540:
528:
527:
519:
507:
506:
503:
502:
491:
485:
484:
482:
479:Spain articles
465:the discussion
452:
451:
435:
423:
422:
414:
402:
401:
398:
397:
386:
380:
379:
377:
360:the discussion
346:
334:
333:
325:
313:
312:
309:
308:
301:Low-importance
297:
291:
290:
288:
257:
245:
244:
242:Low‑importance
236:
224:
223:
217:
195:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3441:
3430:
3427:
3425:
3422:
3420:
3417:
3415:
3412:
3410:
3407:
3405:
3402:
3400:
3397:
3395:
3392:
3390:
3387:
3385:
3382:
3380:
3377:
3375:
3372:
3370:
3367:
3365:
3362:
3360:
3357:
3355:
3352:
3350:
3347:
3345:
3342:
3340:
3337:
3335:
3332:
3330:
3327:
3325:
3322:
3320:
3317:
3315:
3312:
3310:
3307:
3305:
3302:
3301:
3299:
3290:
3286:
3282:
3278:
3274:
3270:
3269:
3268:
3259:
3255:
3251:
3246:
3243:
3240:
3237:
3234:
3231:
3228:
3227:
3226:
3222:
3218:
3213:
3212:
3209:
3205:
3201:
3199:
3195:
3191:
3187:
3186:
3185:
3184:
3180:
3176:
3168:
3164:
3160:
3157:
3153:
3152:
3151:
3146:
3142:
3138:
3134:
3133:
3132:
3131:
3127:
3123:
3115:
3109:
3097:
3093:
3089:
3085:
3081:
3076:
3075:of the north.
3071:
3069:
3065:
3061:
3057:
3053:
3049:
3045:
3044:
3043:
3039:
3035:
3030:
3027:
3024:
3020:
3016:
3013:
3010:
3007:
3004:
3001:
2998:
2995:
2992:
2989:
2986:
2983:
2980:
2977:
2974:
2971:
2968:
2965:
2964:
2963:
2959:
2954:
2950:
2946:
2942:
2939:
2934:
2933:
2932:
2931:
2930:
2926:
2922:
2918:
2914:
2911:
2907:
2904:
2901:
2898:
2894:
2891:
2888:
2884:
2881:
2878:
2875:
2872:
2870:
2867:
2864:
2861:
2858:
2855:
2852:
2851:
2850:
2849:
2845:
2841:
2836:
2830:
2824:
2822:
2821:
2817:
2813:
2809:
2802:
2799:
2798:
2797:
2791:
2789:
2788:
2784:
2780:
2773:
2770:
2769:
2768:
2762:
2760:
2759:
2755:
2751:
2744:
2741:
2740:
2739:
2733:
2727:
2723:
2719:
2715:
2714:
2713:
2709:
2705:
2701:
2700:
2699:
2698:
2694:
2690:
2682:
2674:
2670:
2666:
2662:
2658:
2654:
2650:
2649:
2648:
2644:
2640:
2635:
2634:
2633:
2629:
2625:
2621:
2617:
2613:
2609:
2605:
2601:
2597:
2593:
2589:
2585:
2581:
2580:
2579:
2578:
2574:
2570:
2561:
2559:
2558:
2553:
2548:
2547:
2536:
2532:
2529:
2525:
2524:
2523:
2516:
2510:
2506:
2502:
2498:
2492:
2487:
2482:
2478:
2474:
2472:
2468:
2464:
2462:
2458:
2454:
2453:
2452:
2450:
2446:
2442:
2437:
2431:
2429:
2428:
2424:
2420:
2419:90.162.24.163
2414:
2411:
2410:
2404:
2397:
2390:
2386:
2383:
2379:
2378:
2377:
2370:
2364:
2360:
2356:
2352:
2346:
2341:
2339:
2335:
2328:
2324:
2320:
2319:
2318:
2314:
2306:
2300:
2296:
2291:
2285:
2283:
2282:
2278:
2274:
2270:
2265:
2262:
2258:
2256:
2238:
2234:
2230:
2226:
2222:
2221:
2220:
2216:
2212:
2208:
2204:
2203:
2202:
2201:
2200:
2196:
2192:
2188:
2187:
2186:
2185:
2184:
2180:
2176:
2172:
2168:
2164:
2160:
2156:
2152:
2148:
2144:
2140:
2139:
2138:
2137:
2133:
2129:
2120:
2118:
2117:
2113:
2109:
2105:
2097:
2095:
2094:
2090:
2086:
2085:user:PedroPVZ
2080:
2074:
2072:
2071:
2067:
2063:
2058:
2050:
2048:
2047:
2043:
2039:
2034:
2031:
2029:
2024:
2022:
2018:
2010:
2004:
2000:
1996:
1992:
1988:
1987:
1986:
1985:
1982:
1978:
1974:
1970:
1969:
1968:
1967:
1963:
1959:
1955:
1953:
1949:
1940:
1934:
1931:
1924:
1919:
1918:
1917:
1916:
1913:
1909:
1905:
1900:
1899:
1898:
1897:
1893:
1889:
1872:
1870:
1865:
1864:
1857:
1855:
1851:
1847:
1846:
1841:
1840:
1833:
1831:
1827:
1823:
1819:
1818:
1815:
1809:
1807:
1803:
1799:
1795:
1790:
1788:
1784:
1780:
1775:
1769:
1760:
1759:
1754:
1753:
1746:
1743:
1739:
1735:
1729:
1726:
1722:
1718:
1717:
1714:
1708:
1705:
1699:
1695:
1692:
1688:
1684:
1679:
1675:
1674:
1669:
1666:
1661:
1660:
1659:
1658:
1655:
1652:
1648:
1647:
1646:
1645:
1642:
1636:
1633:
1626:
1623:
1618:
1617:
1616:
1615:
1608:
1607:
1606:
1605:
1602:
1599:
1595:
1591:
1586:
1582:
1577:
1573:
1569:
1565:
1564:
1563:
1562:
1559:
1553:
1550:
1544:
1540:
1537:
1533:
1528:
1524:
1520:
1516:
1512:
1507:
1506:Indo-european
1503:
1502:
1501:
1500:
1497:
1488:
1484:
1481:
1477:
1472:
1471:
1470:Translation:
1469:
1464:
1463:
1461:
1460:
1459:
1458:
1455:
1446:
1444:
1443:
1440:
1427:
1424:
1420:
1419:
1418:
1412:
1408:
1405:
1400:
1399:
1396:
1393:
1388:
1387:
1382:
1380:
1379:Saxony-Anhalt
1375:Nord-Schwaben
1374:
1371:
1370:
1367:
1366:
1363:
1360:
1355:
1354:
1353:
1352:
1349:
1341:
1339:
1338:
1334:
1330:
1325:
1321:
1317:
1308:
1304:
1301:
1297:
1293:
1292:
1291:
1284:
1278:
1274:
1270:
1266:
1265:
1264:
1260:
1256:
1252:
1251:
1250:
1249:
1245:
1241:
1236:
1232:
1230:
1225:
1224:
1220:
1217:
1211:
1196:
1192:
1186:
1183:
1182:
1179:
1162:
1158:
1154:
1153:
1145:
1134:
1132:
1129:
1125:
1124:
1120:
1114:
1111:
1108:
1104:
1088:
1086:
1082:
1079:Feel free to
1073:
1070:
1069:
1067:
1063:
1062:
1058:
1056:
1053:
1051:
1048:
1046:
1043:
1041:
1038:
1036:
1033:
1031:
1028:
1027:
1025:
1021:
1018:
1015:
1008:
1007:Ethnic groups
1001:
1000:
998:
997:
996:
994:
989:
984:
983:
979:
978:
974:
970:
966:
960:
957:
956:
953:
940:Ethnic groups
936:
932:
931:ethnic groups
928:
927:
922:
919:
915:
914:
910:
904:
903:Ethnic groups
901:
898:
894:
882:
865:
861:
860:
855:
852:
848:
847:
843:
840:
837:
834:
830:
813:
812:
808:
797:
796:
795:
794:
788:
787:
786:
785:
784:
777:
776:
775:
774:
773:
765:
764:
763:
762:
756:
753:
752:
751:
750:
744:
740:
739:
738:
737:
733:
727:
722:
718:
717:
713:
710:
709:
705:
704:
703:
702:
696:
695:
691:
689:
688:
684:
682:
681:
677:
676:
675:
674:
668:
665:
663:
660:
659:
658:
657:
653:
651:
647:
646:
640:
637:
635:
632:
630:
627:
625:
622:
621:
619:
618:
614:
613:
609:
605:
601:
595:
592:
591:
588:
571:
567:
563:
562:
554:
543:
541:
538:
534:
533:
529:
523:
520:
517:
513:
500:
496:
490:
487:
486:
483:
466:
462:
458:
457:
449:
438:
436:
433:
429:
428:
424:
418:
415:
412:
408:
395:
391:
385:
382:
381:
378:
361:
357:
353:
352:
347:
344:
340:
339:
335:
329:
326:
323:
319:
306:
302:
296:
293:
292:
289:
272:
268:
264:
263:
258:
255:
251:
250:
246:
240:
237:
234:
230:
225:
221:
215:
207:
206:
196:
192:
187:
186:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
3276:
3266:
3172:
3162:
3149:
3119:
3113:
3079:
2837:
2834:
2828:
2805:
2795:
2776:
2766:
2747:
2737:
2686:
2565:
2543:
2540:
2515:source check
2494:
2488:
2485:
2438:
2435:
2417:Austerlitz--
2415:
2412:
2394:
2369:source check
2348:
2342:
2337:
2333:
2331:
2292:
2289:
2268:
2266:
2260:
2259:
2254:
2251:
2207:deleted part
2158:
2154:
2150:
2146:
2124:
2101:
2081:
2078:
2056:
2054:
2035:
2032:
2025:
2020:
2014:
1990:
1946:
1944:
1885:
1867:
1861:
1860:The article
1843:
1837:
1836:The article
1821:
1810:
1791:
1776:
1773:
1756:
1750:
1749:The article
1745:
1737:
1728:
1720:
1709:
1706:
1703:
1686:
1677:
1637:
1634:
1631:
1593:
1589:
1584:
1580:
1575:
1571:
1554:
1551:
1548:
1531:
1526:
1522:
1518:
1514:
1510:
1492:
1450:
1435:
1416:
1376:
1372:
1345:
1329:71.102.2.206
1312:
1295:
1288:
1237:
1233:
1226:
1221:
1218:
1215:
1190:
1150:
1078:
1059:
1013:
999:Meta-tasks:
985:
964:
924:
857:
805:
792:
791:
781:
780:
769:
768:
760:
759:
748:
747:
735:
734:
725:
720:
714:
706:
700:
699:
692:
685:
678:
672:
671:
655:
654:
649:
648:
599:
559:
494:
454:
448:Spain portal
389:
349:
300:
267:project page
260:
220:WikiProjects
203:
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
2653:Scandinavia
2604:Switzerland
2108:2.245.79.34
1954:in 587–589.
1794:1st century
1576:exhortation
1521:knows, and
1320:West Slavic
1223:Space Cadet
761:Need images
680:Os Lusíadas
148:free images
31:not a forum
3298:Categories
3150:Examples:
2683:Protection
2608:Marcomanni
2606:until the
2552:Report bug
2271:-- slaves.
2170:needed. ;)
2098:Suebenheim
2038:Cadroiolos
1991:suppressed
1952:Reccared I
1941:Suppressed
1822:References
1787:Langobards
1779:Hermunduri
1721:References
1002:Place the
3277:tradition
2908:(Source:
2895:(Source:
2885:(Source:
2716:I Agree.
2535:this tool
2528:this tool
2395:Cheers. —
2389:this tool
2382:this tool
2273:Pbrower2a
1888:Andrarias
1734:Göttingen
1683:Göttingen
1517:know and
1240:Pbrower2a
1012:template
271:talk page
208:is rated
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
3207:"north".
3022:Germani.
2916:Germany.
2612:Alemanni
2541:Cheers.—
2305:cbignore
2269:esclavos
2255:Schwaben
2211:Wolfy SK
2175:Wolfy SK
2104:Mannheim
1923:Matthead
1785:and the
1783:Alamanni
1594:Widsith!
1590:strained
1572:Germania
736:Requests
662:Portugal
575:Portugal
566:Portugal
522:Portugal
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
2718:Krakkos
2665:Krakkos
2624:Krakkos
2600:Austria
2445:my edit
2405::Online
2334:checked
2299:my edit
1928:DisOuß
1792:In the
1574:was an
1421:Done!--
1193:on the
1166:History
1157:History
1113:History
995:tasks:
967:on the
694:More...
673:Improve
629:history
602:on the
497:on the
392:on the
365:Galicia
356:Galicia
328:Galicia
303:on the
210:B-class
154:WP refs
142:scholar
2313:nobots
2225:WP:RSN
1995:Wetman
1958:Wetman
1871:online
1839:Sveber
1752:Sveber
1691:Wetman
1651:Wetman
1598:Wetman
1536:Wetman
1439:Wetman
1404:Ekki01
1392:Wetman
1348:Wetman
1300:Wetman
1229:Swabia
783:Wikify
749:Assess
701:Review
667:Lisbon
216:scale.
126:Google
3158:p.261
3019:paper
2620:Gauls
2616:Quadi
2592:Suebi
2441:Suebi
2295:Suebi
2261:Suebi
1973:Srnec
1863:Suebi
1532:tight
1527:*swe-
1511:point
1480:Berig
1423:Berig
1359:Srnec
1324:Serbs
1296:Svear
1212:Names
793:Vote:
729:box).
639:purge
634:watch
470:Spain
461:Spain
417:Spain
197:This
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
25:Suebi
3285:talk
3254:talk
3221:talk
3194:talk
3179:talk
3141:talk
3126:talk
3092:talk
3064:talk
3038:talk
2958:talk
2949:talk
2925:talk
2844:talk
2816:talk
2783:talk
2754:talk
2722:talk
2708:talk
2693:talk
2669:talk
2643:talk
2628:talk
2602:and
2573:talk
2423:talk
2338:true
2277:talk
2233:talk
2215:talk
2195:talk
2179:talk
2132:talk
2112:talk
2089:talk
2066:talk
2042:talk
1999:talk
1977:talk
1962:talk
1908:talk
1892:talk
1814:Dave
1802:Huns
1798:Elbe
1713:Dave
1665:Dave
1641:Dave
1622:Dave
1581:flow
1558:Dave
1496:Dave
1454:Dave
1333:talk
1273:talk
1259:talk
1244:talk
1231:).
1055:Iyer
741:See
624:edit
594:High
489:High
384:High
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
2810:. —
2509:RfC
2479:to
2469:to
2459:to
2363:RfC
2325:to
2021:not
1866:in
1842:in
1755:in
1678:new
1585:the
1523:you
1185:Mid
1083:or
959:Low
726:not
721:not
295:Low
176:TWL
3300::
3287:)
3256:)
3223:)
3196:)
3181:)
3173:--
3165:,
3143:)
3128:)
3094:)
3066:)
3040:)
2960:)
2927:)
2846:)
2818:)
2785:)
2756:)
2724:)
2710:)
2695:)
2671:)
2645:)
2630:)
2614:,
2610:,
2598:,
2575:)
2522:.
2517:}}
2513:{{
2425:)
2376:.
2371:}}
2367:{{
2311:{{
2307:}}
2303:{{
2279:)
2235:)
2217:)
2197:)
2181:)
2173:--
2134:)
2114:)
2091:)
2083:--
2068:)
2057:am
2044:)
2001:)
1979:)
1964:)
1910:)
1894:)
1853:^
1829:^
1808:.
1437:--
1335:)
1275:)
1261:)
1246:)
1087:.
1010:}}
1004:{{
809:—
156:)
54:;
3283:(
3252:(
3219:(
3192:(
3177:(
3139:(
3124:(
3090:(
3062:(
3036:(
2956:(
2947:(
2923:(
2912:)
2899:)
2889:)
2842:(
2814:(
2781:(
2752:(
2720:(
2706:(
2691:(
2667:(
2641:(
2626:(
2571:(
2554:)
2550:(
2537:.
2530:.
2421:(
2391:.
2384:.
2275:(
2231:(
2213:(
2193:(
2177:(
2159:V
2155:B
2151:W
2147:L
2130:(
2110:(
2087:(
2064:(
2040:(
1997:(
1975:(
1960:(
1906:(
1890:(
1848:.
1761:.
1515:I
1331:(
1271:(
1257:(
1242:(
1197:.
971:.
866:.
606:.
501:.
396:.
307:.
273:.
222::
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
