74:
53:
164:
22:
84:
467:
before hitting the mainland to avoid trouble with xenophobes and/or the law. Maybe both could be handled as something like "spycraft". The
Britons supposedly dyed their skin blue for religious/magical reasons. Presumably there are other instances/reasons/examples of artificially darkened/tinted skin
387:
claims that this produces a better tan than uv exposure are unfounded, sources are making statements about a diet rich in fruit and vegetables are being used to imply that eating large quantities of carotenoid containing foods to produce carotenaemia will give you an attractive tan, even though all
331:
I added this link to the bottom of this page as it has MANY resources for both straight forward information on sunless tanning products, health & safety, and cosmetic concerns as well as a forum for users to respond. This sunless tanning product user feedback section was extremely helpful to me
412:
Reason: Citation to “Dermnet – New
Zealand,” not a scientific site. Rather, the website was founded by a NZ dermatologist, offers “…up to date information on skin diseases and their management.” The section cited was written by Vanessa Ngan, Staff Writer (no other information) 14 years ago (2002).
224:
This article needs a lot of work. It has a good structure and has enough merit to warrant inclusion in
Knowledge (XXG), but it needs to be edited for tone and point of view, as it's mostly written in a sensationalist style. It also contains a lot of factual inaccuracies. It contained a lot of
367:
The claims made in this section, especially "safest" "most effective" and "permanent" seem to have little evidence. Also suspect is the fact that
Carotenoid-based products is the first subheading while topical tanning agents, which are are much more common and mainstream are simply filed under
306:
Edited the page out with misleading quotes that state that artificial tans remove the risk of skin cancer. People who get NO UV and people who get too much UV both share a higher risk of skin cancer, so total avoidance isn't prevention, and we should be careful not to imply this.
267:
forward slash (/) after a file name at the end of a url will screw the link more often than not. If you're going to contribute to an article, take the time to do it right and check your work. Others are supposed to be contributing their findings, not cleaning up your mess.
581:
This is an encyclopedia article on spray tanning and the main image is of someone who isn't even confirmed to have done it before? Only deemed "plausible" by the NYT? Bit ridiculous if you ask me. Maybe include the image lower in the article with an explanatory caption.
168:
352:
There are plenty of links on the page, but they are put in the article instead of used as footnotes. I feel there are plenty of citations in the article to verify the claims made on the page, and organization is the problem. Will see about fixing that soon.
509:
to say that he uses tanning lotion or any other method. And a reliable source in this case would IMO have to be someone with better information than conclusions drawn from looking at photos. Perhaps a better image to show what sunless tanning looks like is
332:
as I looked at options for creation of a new product. I'm fairly sure that this information would be of benefit to someone looking for more information on sunless tanners in general as it discusses the real-world usage experiences of many people.
271:
The article is very U.S. centric. More references to non-american regulations would be in order. This article should rather feature a general person in a spray tan facility rather than Donald Trump, especially when the photo is inobvious
532:
OK, using a NYT as a source that it is plausible that self-tanning products are the reason for Trump's winter tan. The article indicates why other explanations are unlikely, but that is too much info to include in the caption
325:(most?) of the internet resources on Sunless Tanning, DHA, Erythrulose, Melanotan, tyrosine, etc... The resources I found most useful were this article on Knowledge (XXG) and a website called Sunless.com
490:
which says "There is debate as to whether Donald Trump’s skin tone is due to a spray-on tan, sunbed or make-up." The image has been removed and can't be restored unless there is a supporting source.
388:
images of carotenaemia i could find look similar to jaundice and/or are localized to a specific area such as the nose, none of which resemble the look of someone who has a sun induced tan
338:
I would propose that you/we add a link to this website to the wikipedia article as it provides additional information and provides a forum for those who wish to discuss sunless tanners.
464:
447:
like Burton felt they needed to artificially darken their skin to avoid being exposed and executed for violating its sanctity and
Lazarite missionaries to China like
140:
335:
I am not affiliated with the website. To my knowledge the website is not a commercial site; although it does have that appearance on first inspection.
180:
649:
130:
225:
external links (most of which I deleted). Also, it contains a lot of broken links that all seem to be really the same thing; for example, it has
488:
644:
106:
612:
Strongly agreed; including Trump as the only image in the article based on speculation, even speculation from a RS, is pretty ridiculous.
210:
436:
we should discuss and link blackface from here, at least in the context of actors playing We 3 Kings, Othello, Black Peit, &c. and
391:
409:
Deleted: "Since the coloration that forms does not provide much protection against UV, and the effect only lasts for a few hours,"
97:
58:
33:
587:
290:
167:
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki
Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available
555:
Well, I'm not particularly happy about including Trump but with the caption now saying "plausible" I think the image is OK.
511:
421:
Currently this seems to be
Knowledge (XXG)'s only article on the concept of skin modification (/skin dyeing) besides
583:
617:
321:
While doing extensive research on formulation of a sunless tanning product (I am a formulation chemist) I saw
39:
21:
214:
452:
395:
278:
206:
440:
we should have a further discussion of other skin darkening practices beyond the present-day First World.
613:
226:
373:
230:
105:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
248:
369:
469:
456:
311:
282:
538:
448:
286:
188:
172:
460:
560:
519:
495:
506:
422:
339:
89:
638:
534:
354:
308:
184:
244:
556:
515:
505:
I know his skin colour does look artificial, but without a reliable source it's
491:
163:
73:
52:
487:
The caption that says Trump uses tanning lotion isn't supported by the source
79:
426:
234:
621:
591:
564:
542:
523:
499:
477:
399:
377:
357:
342:
294:
251:
218:
192:
102:
243:
Beyond that, most of this article seems to be copied verbatim from
444:
15:
463:& al. protecting most Europeans from most persecution)
203:
Would someone please translate this article into spanish.
326:
158:
Wiki
Education Foundation-supported course assignment
101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
443:Off the top of my head, early European visitors to
363:Prominence of "Carotenoid-based products" subject
432:If this is going to be our only spot for this,
8:
19:
47:
465:felt they needed to dye their skin yellow
348:Changed tag from Unreferenced to Clean Up
301:
263:need to learn how to use links. Adding a
181:Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment
302:No sun doesn't equal no skin cancer risk
179:Above undated message substituted from
49:
7:
95:This article is within the scope of
115:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Fashion
38:It is of interest to the following
14:
453:Franciscans & co. mucking up
162:
82:
72:
51:
20:
650:Low-importance fashion articles
135:This article has been rated as
1:
565:14:56, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
543:05:27, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
524:12:01, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
468:that should be touched on. —
378:06:50, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
219:21:31, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
109:and see a list of open tasks.
645:Start-Class fashion articles
592:16:01, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
512:File:Tanning lotion mens.jpg
247:... Possibly copyright vio?
193:10:26, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
118:Template:WikiProject Fashion
500:18:03, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
317:Inclusion of a helpful link
295:22:33, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
259:Some of you people really,
666:
622:23:39, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
252:13:50, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
237:15:29, Feb 10, 2005 (UTC)
141:project's importance scale
478:06:00, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
358:22:57, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
312:23:57, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
134:
67:
46:
400:20:42, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
343:15:52, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
451:(coming in between the
28:This article is rated
171:. Student editor(s):
32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
584:MikeLovesBaseballCap
227:self-tanning lotion
98:WikiProject Fashion
383:carotenoid tanning
231:self-tanning cream
169:on the course page
34:content assessment
461:Treaty of Nanjing
457:Jesuits' missions
298:
281:comment added by
245:HowStuffWorks.com
209:comment added by
155:
154:
151:
150:
147:
146:
657:
475:
474:
405:Deletion 12/1/16
297:
275:
221:
195:
166:
123:
122:
121:fashion articles
119:
116:
113:
92:
87:
86:
85:
76:
69:
68:
63:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
665:
664:
660:
659:
658:
656:
655:
654:
635:
634:
485:
472:
470:
419:
417:Earlier history
407:
385:
365:
350:
319:
304:
299:
276:
204:
201:
178:
160:
120:
117:
114:
111:
110:
88:
83:
81:
61:
29:
12:
11:
5:
663:
661:
653:
652:
647:
637:
636:
633:
632:
631:
630:
629:
628:
627:
626:
625:
624:
614:Faceless Enemy
601:
600:
599:
598:
597:
596:
595:
594:
572:
571:
570:
569:
568:
567:
548:
547:
546:
545:
527:
526:
484:
481:
423:skin whitening
418:
415:
406:
403:
384:
381:
364:
361:
349:
346:
318:
315:
303:
300:
274:
257:
256:
255:
254:
200:
197:
159:
156:
153:
152:
149:
148:
145:
144:
137:Low-importance
133:
127:
126:
124:
107:the discussion
94:
93:
90:Fashion portal
77:
65:
64:
62:Low‑importance
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
662:
651:
648:
646:
643:
642:
640:
623:
619:
615:
611:
610:
609:
608:
607:
606:
605:
604:
603:
602:
593:
589:
585:
580:
579:
578:
577:
576:
575:
574:
573:
566:
562:
558:
554:
553:
552:
551:
550:
549:
544:
540:
536:
531:
530:
529:
528:
525:
521:
517:
513:
508:
504:
503:
502:
501:
497:
493:
489:
482:
480:
479:
476:
466:
462:
458:
454:
450:
446:
441:
439:
435:
430:
428:
424:
416:
414:
410:
404:
402:
401:
397:
393:
389:
382:
380:
379:
375:
371:
362:
360:
359:
356:
347:
345:
344:
341:
336:
333:
329:
327:
324:
316:
314:
313:
310:
296:
292:
288:
284:
280:
273:
269:
266:
262:
253:
250:
246:
242:
241:
240:
239:
238:
236:
232:
228:
222:
220:
216:
212:
211:201.141.210.3
208:
198:
196:
194:
190:
186:
182:
176:
174:
173:Deliriumwaltz
170:
165:
157:
142:
138:
132:
129:
128:
125:
108:
104:
100:
99:
91:
80:
78:
75:
71:
70:
66:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
486:
442:
437:
433:
431:
420:
411:
408:
390:
386:
366:
351:
337:
334:
330:
322:
320:
305:
270:
264:
260:
258:
249:24.0.253.136
223:
205:— Preceding
202:
177:
161:
136:
96:
40:WikiProjects
392:80.5.128.19
370:Bockrocker2
277:—Preceding
30:Start-class
639:Categories
368:"Other".
427:blackface
340:Kemistboy
265:backslash
535:Peaceray
471:Llywelyn
459:and the
449:Abbé Huc
355:Pharmboy
309:Pharmboy
291:contribs
283:Eysteine
279:unsigned
207:unsigned
199:Comments
185:PrimeBOT
139:on the
112:Fashion
103:Fashion
59:Fashion
261:really
36:scale.
507:WP:OR
483:Trump
445:Mecca
618:talk
588:talk
561:talk
539:talk
520:talk
496:talk
455:the
425:and
396:talk
374:talk
323:many
287:talk
235:Brim
233:. —
229:and
215:talk
189:talk
557:Sjö
516:Sjö
492:Sjö
183:by
131:Low
641::
620:)
590:)
563:)
541:)
522:)
514:.
498:)
473:II
438:b)
434:a)
429:.
398:)
376:)
328:.
293:)
289:•
217:)
191:)
175:.
616:(
586:(
559:(
537:(
518:(
494:(
394:(
372:(
285:(
213:(
187:(
143:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
