1260:. Mine was just a crude example, but those colors help us a great deal and there must be some middle ground on this. It would be better if the cells remain fully colored in. Knowledge has plenty of example of colored cells including MOS and essays. If the choice of green is too dark or vivid it can easily be softened to more of a standard html5 color. I can't tell you how many folks I talk to that watch the show simply say the "green tribe", or the "yellow tribe", rather than the tribe name. It's ingrained in the show and is quite important. Does it need to be the exact color green from the show?... not if we can help our sight-challenged readers see the text a bit better. Screen readers should have no trouble. But we also don't want our majority of sighted readers to be inconvenienced either, and from dark-bold colors to white or grey is a bookend of extremes we can avoid.
2175:
good template that we can take advantage of in improving this article further. The first few places that need to be improved are the following: an
Overview section should be added at the beginning of the article that gives a brief synopsis of Survivor as a show, as well as any relevant information about the location or production of the season; the episode summaries should all be reviewed and given proper attention (I see that episode five doesn't have a summary at all as of now); and, if possible, some illustrations of the contestants or maybe the filming location should be added to better the article. Again, I think that this is definitely an article that we can work through, but I do see these as major issues right off the bat, before I even get into the more minor issues.
1332:
at work in replacing the old chart, I would be fired! The old chart conveys the info best. Having the name age and location in the same box is tighter and lets readers assimilate the info in one glance. The color for the tribes is missing... that alone would have a magazine throw out my submission. And turning "Finish" cell into two cells with extra subheadings is overkill. It also make the entire table wider which is tougher on cell phones. In the real world, the new chart is busier and much harder to navigate for most readers. Again, Wiki has it's rules we follow but sometimes it's a bitter pill when it's our readers who suffer the consequences. My choice when asked is to give the best experience to our readers, not wikipedia management.
1299:
helpful. You might say that fans of the show might only remember the colours used with the individual tribes, but I counter that someone reading the article who doesn't have that information will be completely lost. The voting history is the same on the old version, it is using that colour to mean that a that person was a part of that tribe, but doesn't explain that at any time, and is using that colour as the only way to distinguish information... Which is against our MOS. I can't say that there being colours in the contestant summary would be all that big of a deal - but also, when we literally have a table for who won each challenge, and every tribal council do we even list this information again in the contestants section?
1317:
When we start to get distance from the first time someone's tribe is mentioned it's not a bad thing to do so again. MOS also gives us the ability balance things with common sense. What MOS does not allow us to do would be use color alone to distinguish data. But we have a tribe name smack dab in the middle of that color to distinguish what it's for. That should be good enough for MOS. If you want more then add a small key table above the chart with color and tribe name. I agree that color in the cell is better. What I was worried about was contrast of the cell color with the text so visually impaired readers could best make out the text while still conveying tribe color to sighted readers.
2326:]. Looking at the television part of the MOS, it seems as though the expectation is for the series overview to contain a section dedicated to the plot of the season in one of two ways: an episode table in which each episode's plot is summarized in no more than 200 words OR a prose plot summary of 500 words for the entire season. Looking at this, I would lean towards the former option. To do otherwise would require a series overview with an average of 33 words for each episode. The MOS guide specifically notes that an article should NOT contain an episode table summary AND a prose plot summary, which is an issue since this article contains both.
2285:
with
Clarence), while still being concise, though, again, even it needs to be reworded to sound less clunky. To give an example of some of the clunkiness, "The tribes are told of the immunity challenge but do not realize they have reached the merge until they arrive, and the challenge is now on an individual level." seems like it could be simplified to something like "When the contestants arrive at the immunity challenge, they learn that they are all merging into one tribe, thus entering the individual portion of the game."
502:
492:
468:
2314:
information. The climax of most episodes of the show is someone getting voted out, and thus, the most necessary part of an episode summary should be the explanation of why the person who left did, how they did (or didn't) attempt to save themselves, and (assuming they did try) why their plan failed. In addition, the summary may mention important themes or plot points that come up later in the season, like Teresa's vote for Lex in the merge episode.
436:
416:
346:
1291:- apologies, I thought we were still discussing the voting history table. I don't know, I think I even prefer the background to the weird outlines. The thing is, a lot of these articles have severe duplication of information. Prior to changes, the contestant section would state which tribe they were on, and then that would also be stated again in the season summary, and then again in two places on the voting history.
21:
3206:
3183:
3165:
3134:
3110:
3083:
3069:
3040:
3022:
3008:
2994:
2959:
2925:
2157:
2133:
2115:
2083:
2058:
1986:
1968:
1940:
274:
564:
2030:
2016:
1954:
1904:
1870:
576:
336:
305:
1551:
and jury member data into one cell, since they are elements of the same component, and having a separate column for jury members left the table with a lot of dead space on the far right column on both the top and bottom, and looked awkward. As far as readability, it’s the voting table at the bottom that’s incredibly wide, but there’s very little we can do to remedy that.
2620:
summarize that the younger players took control of
Samburu but the older players were able to adjust to the tribe swap. Similarly, make sure that Boran also receives a bit of attention in the summary. The goal here should be to follow the broad narrative that CBS is attempting to tell. I don't know that the section needs a full rewrite, but it could use work.
1739:
2637:
clunky. The second comma in the sentence about The Purple Rock
Podcast is unnecessary, and, again, the multiple quotations make the sentences clunky (assuming citing a fan site is proper to begin with). In the last sentence of the section, a semicolon is incorrectly used to introduce a quote. Really, this whole section could use a rewrite.
2460:
Again, this one looks alright. The one other possible controversy that comes to my mind is in regards to the "Beangate" situation between
Clarence and Diane in the first episode and specifically the way in which Clarence was treated by the other members of his tribe being perceived by some viewers as
1550:
I actually like the new layouts, although I could see adding a softer version of whatever color to the contestants’ table since the tribe name is also given. I like having the age and hometown separated, as well as the day of elimination. The only adjustment I did was to combine the elimination order
1376:
That's fair. I don't particularly like the amount of colour, but so long as the article (and these articles in general) meet the MOS, that is all I care about. I am steadily working my way through them with a plan to GA, so that is the solution. The voting history table is very much where the MOS was
2187:
The lead should be a bit more in-depth a summary. For example, Ethan ought to be specified to have won the cash prize of one million dollars in addition to the title. Furthermore, some information ought be included about the tribes the and the contestants divided into them. Again, I think looking at
1331:
As for your example on the Africa "List of
Survivor: Africa contestants", beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I understand Knowledge MOS wanting separate columns (especially for sorting), and I understand them trying to avoid the small text unless necessary. That said, if I presented the new chart
1316:
Quite often info is repeated if it's in a separate table. Just like linking. MOS tells us not to overlink once a person is already linked in prose, but often the first time someone's name is mentioned in a new table, their name is linked, and every subsequent table is the also linked the first time.
2734:
We are talking about challenges where the description of the task can be really long-winded. Sure, "hold your hand up for the longest", is quite easy to explain, but a multi-task challenge with a puzzle at the end would be a bit much to explain and then just say that X won. There's also usually two
2351:
No drama. I actually prefer the plot summary to the episode list as survivor is a series that is much less about the individual episodes and more about how the tides turn over it. The current plot summary is less than 500, so if you are cool with it, I'll remove the info from the episode summaries.
2329:
Forgive me for this; I made the mistake of using the other GA listed seasons to help me find the mistakes in this one. While that's not entirely unfair, I should have checked the MOS first. I'm still quite new to reviewing, so I hope you'll excuse the mistake; I know that I'll become better at this
1597:
You don’t see the overcomplication the new tables create? Rowspans for tribe membership unless it’s a merged tribe is just creating more work for the editor. Knowledge should be an easily disgusted article for the subject matter. This and other changes do not accomplish that. The old system worked,
2787:
about the season summary being more important than individual episode summaries is because this is a case where the whole does not necessarily equal the sum of its parts. Some episodes are vital to the story of a season. Others really don't have much impact at all. Ultimately, I feel that the page
2651:
the actual game elements, like challenges and swaps, should still be documented as those are obvious, require no interpretation, and should remain relatively short. The season summary can document how major player actions influenced the game at a level that is too hard to delve into interpretative
2280:
I notice that reading through all of the summaries, the winner of the season, Ethan, is barely mentioned at all. On one hand, I understand that Ethan wasn't the most strategic player on the season or even the one who was usually in the spotlight; on the other hand, it is an issue that if I had not
1708:
I'm sorry, I don't have anything new to add, just to say that this new layout is very uncomfortable to read or even understand the voting process. Colors are parts of the game, fans might not remember the tribe names, but they'd remember their colors. This feels like an unnecessary change. The old
1298:
is a diff from before changes were made to the tables. The contestants table uses small html lettering, which isn't something we should ever use, thus meaning suitability for creating columns for age and location. Having a series of yellows, red and greens, especially without any explanation isn't
1098:
We are not supposed to represent important information by color, that is a core facet of ACCESS. And the fact that people wanted to use the exact tribe colors, which nearly always were not accessible colors, and use those over and over and over again, made that even more difficult. Using the tribe
2313:
They definitely don't need to go super in depth, but I do think most of them could use at least a bit more meat. If you look at Season 40's episodes that give the ins and outs of every single challenge throughout the season and all that, I definitely think it comes out to way too much unnecessary
2284:
I think that the summary of episode seven, though very clunky, is a decent example of the amount of information that ought to be contained within the summary. It establishes the main plots of the episode (the merge, the deal struck between Teresa and
Clarence, and everybody else's refusal to work
2174:
Looking at the article in its current state, I definitely do see some significant work that needs to be done. Fortunately, several articles on other seasons (Borneo, the
Australian Outback, and Cook Islands) of the show have been classified as Good Articles, and I think that they provide a pretty
1626:
Sorry but your ideas for the new table formats are not very good. In fact, they make it more difficult to understand than before as others above have also mentioned. It actually seems more people are against this new table layout. So maybe we should go back to the drawing board before making such
1361:
I understand that, and I said sorting comes into play because of wikipedia rules. We are not a magazine. If we were we would take things into consideration like aesthetics, ease of use, and our readers. Sorting age and birth year is extremely trivial. Splitting the last column into two columns is
2751:
Working from the
Amazing Race articles (where our episode "summaries" there are limited to the tasks and locations), I think it is entirely possible to write the tasks for Survivor w/o getting into the weeds about the rules. What is 100% in the weeds is the strategy discussion at the individual
2333:
With all that said, how do you think is best to approach the article from here? Additionally, is there anything I've described here that I'm misunderstanding (because, again, I'm very new to this)? Assuming that I am properly understanding, my recommendation would be a full deletion of the prose
2254:
This is also relatively solid, at least for the most part. I think that it would come off less clunky to refer to the two Kims on the season as Powers and
Johnson rather than by their last initials (after going through the whole article, this is actually an issue that is not unique to the season
2692:
I mean, I get why you might want to include info on swaps, or major gameplay items, but things like challenges rarely have an effect on the outcome of a vote, unless a potential votee wins immunity. The actual details of the challenges are kinda irrelevant in my eyes. I think the current way of
2317:
I used episode seven as my example, which, in hindsight, was a pretty terrible choice. When I made this comment originally, I did so thinking about quantity of information over quality of information. Quality-wise, episode seven dwells way too much on Teresa and Clarence at the challenge, while
1569:
The contestant layout is dreadful. Colours are a huge part of Survivor (tribe designation being pivotal) and unnecessarily creating rowspan for tribe swaps is an incredible amount of overkill and overcomplication. But the episode guide and voting chart USE the colours? There's no uniformity and
1474:
to note that someone was in the red team over and over again in an article. We also mention in prose what colours the teams are - so all I can suggest is that these tables are being used for quick reference for fans of the show. We don t (or at least shouldn't) have items designed for fans, but
2636:
There are several errors here, especially with quotations and punctuation. Dalton Ross' quote is a bit clunky; it would be smoother to use a paraphrase, especially because whoever quoted Ross messed with his original punctuation. Similarly, using three Santilli quotations in one sentence feels
866:
Can we please not remove the original tribes and colors associated with them ? Almost every other season of survivor has made it clear which tribe each contestant was on throughout the various tribe swaps. These changes do nothing but confuse the reader. I’ve seen many complaints about the new
2619:
Since we've decided to go with the season summary route, the summary should really be rewritten to better encompass the season as a whole. I would take the focus off of specifics such as Carl and Lindsey's quiz at tribal council or Linda's being voted off; instead, it would be simpler just to
2906:
has not edited for two months, I am taking over this GAN. I see that there was quite a bit of discussion about things like episode summaries but those seem to have been revolved, as have the other issues relating to quotes. Overall, this article passes all criteria and is an easy promote.
926:
I understand why losing some of that color can be disconcerting since it's been there so long. However, as an editor in a topic area that is similarly impacted by inaccessible pages, this is important. What may be lost for sighted people (and it might be nice to have a color
1419:
Yes there is, they do not provide any new information already given by the tribe name. The excessive use of color is something that is reflective of fan-driven tracking of players, and that's beyond our purpose here; we need to keep these "bland" to meet MOS standards.
1475:
optimized for the general reader. It's the same reason why we don't have trivia sections. The article is perfectly readable without the colours, and pointing to the season summary section isn't great, as that table probably needs a cull of fancruft too. Best Wishes,
1612:
No, Knowledge articles should follow the MOS as for any other article. The old system didn't meet the MOS guidelines. It makes no difference what the season is about. If you want to have different tables that don't meet the MOS, do it on a fan website. Best Wishes,
1437:
No there isn't and yes they do. It is not excessive in the least because the show constantly throws the colors in our faces. It is very important to keep, and we do not in the least need to "keep these "bland" to meet MOS standards"... that is far from true.
1084:
How so? How does a reader even know that there is any meaning for the colouring? It's not what is important for Survivor, it's important for Knowledge. If you can come up with an alternative table that follows the MOS, then that would be fine. Best Wishes,
2735:
challenges per episode - I feel like we're getting down the fancruft avenue. In the past, these episode summaries have been incredibly wrong with all the details of the reward and immunity challenges, along with names that aren't mentioned in the episodes.
2669:
I agree, losing the episode summaries is a real loss. Sure, some of these could use some work compared to more recent seasons. But I was under the impression that individual episode summaries were preferable to season-long recaps, although in the case of
2546:
I've done a couple replies. I think this pretty much boils down to whether or not we kill off the episode summaries. That would be my preferred way to deal with it - as individual episodes just give details on challenges and such, not really an overview.
1469:
I'm really unsure how colours being used in the show (which I don't even think is true) has any baring on how we layout the tables on Knowledge. I feel like the arguments are to appease fans of the show, which isn't what we are here for. It feels very
2839:
The season summary is far better because it captures broad trends in how a given season goes. I do think we still can have the season summary and episode "summations" which only touch on the gameplay activities (including things like merges, etc.).
2273:
Maybe the section that needs the most work. Some of these episodes summaries are just too shallow. The fifth episode, arguably one of the most consequential episodes of Survivor considering the introduction of the tribe swap, has no summary
2824:
That may well be the case; I'm not an authority here. I mainly want to emphasize that the season summary and episode summary are two separate things. If we can only have one, I don't want to sacrifice the former for the sake of the latter.
2264:
I think it should be noted within the summary that Teresa was responsible for the mystery vote against Lex at the Clarence elimination. The current summary leaves the reader wondering whether or not Kelly actually was responsible for the
1390:
So, are you saying that coloring the tribe cells on the contestant table is okay? I redid a number of the Survivor tables based on the Cook Islands table, and don't want to continue if they're just going to be reverted. Please advise.
1641:
The Manual of Style is a site wide consensus. We can't just revert to a version that doesn't meet this. If you can come up with a better version that is fully MOS compliant, I'd be more than willing to look at it. Best Wishes,
1067:
That can be remedied, but the color of the tribe is far from irrelevant. It's one of the more helpful items in quickly discerning who has been voted off. Color is important in Survivor... it's not some arbitrary use of color.
207:
839:
2779:
As a note, is there a reason why individual Survivor episodes couldn't be made their own individual articles? If not, that's where I feel that would be the better place for most challenge or strategy-related
2610:
I wonder if the paragraph at the beginning of this section may not go better in the Overview section. It also might still be good to mention something about the jury, if we're mentioning the tribe swaps and
2806:
is very small. While there is definitely recap coverage and some opinion in that, it is nowhere close to the standard the TV project has for standalone television episodes, much less those from reality TV.
2583:
I'll be finishing the review soon enough, but I want to make sure there's future clarity on how the season/episode summaries need to be handled. Once I look through the article again, I'll get back to you.
1054:, the current version isn't even stringent enough. What is more, the colour of the tribe is irrelevant. The information is plenty with saying who was voting, and which person was voted off. Best Wishes,
867:
changes in the fan base, and if someone were to go back on these confusing and pointless changes, I will personally begin to donate to Knowledge for making the right changes to the topics I care about.
2647:
A comment about the episode summaries. I fully agree that on these Survivor articles they are far too long and tend to get lost in trying to interpret motives and intents of the scheming by players,
445:
319:
2035:
I think a section should probably be added that breifly describes the show as a whole. Some of the episode summaries need to go a little more in-depth. I'll point out individual issues I see below.
973:
Does anyone else agree that the new table layout for contestants, season summary, and voting history are very unpleasing to the eye? The way that they were previously looked way better. Thoughts?
425:
315:
1362:
better for wiki, not for readers. I didn't revert those things because of wikipedia rules. But the table is worse for it. The cell tribe color is different though... it is useful and important.
2788:
for a season of any show needs to be focused on the specifics of that show as a whole, and not the individual pieces. Season summaries probably fulfill that role better than episode summaries.
1346:
We aren't a magazine. We follow our style guidelines. There's a reason why we don't usually keep lots of different pieces of information in the same cell, that's due to sorting. Best Wishes,
951:
But what about users that might be dyslexic who would regularly rely on the colors and original format? Removing all of the color and previous organization structure negatively impacts them.
1103:
in appropriate locations in a table and then repeating the tribe name in normal non-colored text is far more appropriate even if it made it a tad less easy to see the results at a glance. --
1666:
833:
1909:
I definitely do see some grammar issues throughout the article that need to be improved. When I see minor issues, I'll fix them myself, but if anything larger comes up, I'll let you know!
1131:
2500:
That's okay with me. I've seen you around the community enough to know you're pretty active, so I'll take your word that you'll be here to check in on things once you get the chance!
2461:
having racist connotations. If there is sufficient information about that incident, particularly if it came up at all contemporary to the season, it should probably be included here.
3261:
931:
somehow) is more than made up for by the addition of features that make these tables more readable for the color-blind and those who use screen readers to interact with the web.
2292:
for example says these should be 700 characters for example. I'll have a scunny through, and maybe watch the swap episode again and write something up. Give me a bit of time.
742:
3276:
450:
2258:
The first paragraph focuses heavily on the tribe dynamics of the Samburu tribe, almost without mentioning dynamics of Boran, the tribe that the final four players came from.
201:
836:
to list the vote totals in the same order as the names in the finalist row immediately above the vote totals. All interested editors are invited to join that discussion.
988:
The changes look terrible and I dread the possibility of this spreading to the rest of the seasons, making them significantly more difficult to easily and quickly read.
1163:
They were not unreadable at all. Could the colors have been better... sure... but they are important that the tribes are starkly different. Do you even watch the show?
907:
Also, I will eventually change this to be uniform across all of these articles, but consistency is not a good reason for things to not adhere to MOS. See our policy on
2894:
1848:
1744:
3281:
2947:
2063:
On a quick skim of the article, this doesn't seem like a major issue. I'll keep an eye out for any problems here when I take the time to read a little more closely.
1892:
1777:
632:
774:
770:
756:
664:
660:
646:
3271:
3266:
1767:
3296:
3256:
3251:
548:
406:
396:
3306:
3157:
2107:
1584:
The big issue with the old version of the contestants table is having three pieces of information in one cell, small tags and no rowscopes. Best Wishes,
1229:
At the very least we can put a border color around each cell to designate the tribe color. There is no reason to throw the baby out with the bath water.
133:
2138:
If illustrations are available, and I've got to think they are, we could definitely use some. Visually, the article is pretty bare-bones at this point.
3286:
2951:
2943:
2321:
At the end of the day, the main point I should've made it to say that, if nothing else, at least some of the episode summaries need to be rewritten.
1896:
1888:
98:
2337:
Sorry, I know that's a lot of information, but I want to ensure we're on the same page. Please let me know if you have any thoughts. Many thanks!
554:
32:
3241:
3000:
2935:
1946:
1880:
1489:
This right here. Compare these tables to major sporting events where colors also are key and they use colors too but far more limiting (eg see
1749:
3246:
368:
139:
743:
https://web.archive.org/web/20150929005917/http://www.purplerockpodcast.com/2015/01/12/survivor-season-rankings-with-spoiler-free-summaries/
3316:
1816:
952:
868:
372:
3311:
2709:
I would disagree with the challenges, in part as they are the most objective part of any episode and part of the structure of the show.
1698:
1205:
46:
3175:
2884:
2125:
1838:
1599:
1571:
2191:
I fixed a couple minor verb tense issues in the lead. If the rest the article resembles the lead, grammar work will need to be done.
3291:
1302:
I just want the articles to meet the MOS so that they can be viewable by all, and get the items up to a higher rating. Best Wishes,
752:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
746:
642:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
524:
2324:
The part of the MOS you've linked me to seems to be in reference to episodic video games and not television, which is found here:
1135:
3301:
3236:
3171:
2986:
2939:
2121:
1932:
1884:
1050:
The previous version didn't have row or column scopes, so that is an instant MOS failure. We need to minimize use of colour. Per
942:
633:
https://web.archive.org/web/20151217035409/http://zap2it.com/2015/05/celebrate-survivor-15th-anniversary-10-best-5-worst-seasons/
359:
310:
222:
3096:
2890:
2044:
1844:
1772:
1051:
244:
189:
153:
84:
38:
3014:
1960:
1627:
drastic and unpopular changes. I understand the colors need to be changed but the new table format just isn't going to work.
158:
74:
2281:
seen the season before, I would have absolutely no clue why Ethan would have won the game from the episode summaries alone.
128:
2628:
The section looks good to me, but judging off the discussion, this definitely has broader implications than this article.
636:
817:
707:
515:
473:
285:
2318:
comparatively taking almost no time to explain why Clarence was voted out when his tribe had the majority over Samburu.
589:
478:
119:
2237:
Overall, this part looks alright. I would add a mention of the players making up the jury from the final 11 onwards.
183:
908:
239:
1690:
must understand to use the "new" table to read certain readers with brightness and contrast between color tables.
2931:
1876:
1795:
53:
773:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
663:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
253:
2830:
2793:
2589:
2537:
2505:
2370:
2342:
1810:
1714:
179:
956:
872:
2976:
1922:
1598:
it’s not in line with Skill based shows as it factors in social politics, advantages, physicality and luck.
1443:
1410:
1367:
1337:
1322:
1265:
1234:
1168:
1073:
1041:
808:
734:
698:
624:
163:
1405:
There is nothing wrong with colored cells at all. However the shade of color should match html5 standards.
3212:
3075:
3061:
2515:
2022:
2008:
1791:
1603:
1575:
978:
730:
229:
2903:
2867:
2826:
2789:
2694:
2585:
2567:
2533:
2501:
2380:
2366:
2338:
2243:
I'll have to fact check the information in the chart at a later point, but the formatting all looks good.
1826:
1806:
20:
1632:
792:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
780:
682:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
670:
291:
2485:
All looks very doable. You may need to give me a little time as I've got quite a bit on at the moment.
733:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
623:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
3032:
3028:
1978:
1974:
1213:
938:
2411:
1710:
215:
109:
523:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1691:
1665:
Rather than have this conversation as a split over many pages, I've created a suitable thread at
1439:
1406:
1363:
1333:
1318:
1261:
1230:
1198:
1164:
1069:
1037:
989:
849:
747:
http://www.purplerockpodcast.com/2015/01/12/survivor-season-rankings-with-spoiler-free-summaries/
258:
124:
1493:
where team colors are used for table headers but thats its). Naming the tribes is sufficient. --
777:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
667:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
491:
467:
195:
793:
683:
2872:
2784:
2740:
2698:
2572:
2549:
2487:
2470:
2422:
2385:
2354:
2294:
2289:
2219:
2196:
1687:
1671:
1644:
1615:
1586:
1477:
1379:
1348:
1304:
1245:
1218:
1150:
1087:
1056:
974:
913:
896:
351:
105:
42:
882:
We are on Knowledge, not a fan website. Everything that has been changed is to adhere to our
3147:
2679:
2523:
2402:
2097:
1628:
1556:
1529:
1396:
1007:
993:
891:
726:
616:
255:
78:
1686:
requirements. The Reddit Survivor should have getting to understand with the arguments. So
1570:
creates a mish mash of information that can be explained clearer using colour identifiers.
800:
690:
2848:
2815:
2760:
2717:
2660:
1501:
1471:
1428:
1111:
1018:
932:
435:
364:
1682:
This is a total outrage within the table format for all seasons that doesn't comply with
1036:
How does using color with other attributes violate WP:Access? The design works as it is.
415:
2407:
1490:
759:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
649:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
1524:
Please advise as to whether or not the colors should remain on the contestants table.
799:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
689:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
637:
http://zap2it.com/2015/05/celebrate-survivor-15th-anniversary-10-best-5-worst-seasons/
3230:
2250:
Season summary (on hold; please see my comment below before you do any work on this)
883:
844:
507:
2738:
I don't think it matters in terms of the season what the individual challenges are.
345:
2518:
that might be appropriate since that was the reserve where this season was filmed.
581:
2420:
I mean, sure - I didn't write that article, nor is this a review of that article.
1991:
Definitely will get started on this part when I get a chance and get back to you.
842:
and the talk pages for each Survivor season in order to reach interested editors.
2675:
2519:
1552:
1525:
1392:
766:
656:
367:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can
1709:
format is much better and easier not only to understand but easier to the eye.
894:. Donating to Knowledge makes no difference to the content on it. Best Wishes,
2841:
2808:
2753:
2710:
2653:
1683:
1667:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject Television/Survivor task force#MOS fixes for tables
1494:
1421:
1197:
Hopefully this will be applied in all seasons to make the table layout clean.
1104:
1031:
1011:
887:
765:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
655:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
571:
497:
341:
2468:
If there is a suitable ref, I'd do so. I had a scunny and couldn't see one.
257:
2400:
no longer needs episode summaries, why not eliminate the episode recaps in
1798:. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
563:
3217:
2878:
2852:
2834:
2819:
2797:
2764:
2746:
2721:
2704:
2683:
2664:
2593:
2578:
2555:
2541:
2527:
2509:
2493:
2476:
2428:
2415:
2391:
2374:
2360:
2346:
2300:
2225:
2202:
1820:
1718:
1700:
1677:
1650:
1636:
1621:
1607:
1592:
1579:
1560:
1533:
1505:
1483:
1447:
1432:
1414:
1400:
1385:
1371:
1354:
1341:
1326:
1310:
1269:
1251:
1238:
1224:
1207:
1172:
1156:
1139:
1115:
1093:
1077:
1062:
1045:
1022:
997:
982:
960:
946:
919:
902:
876:
856:
834:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject Television/Survivor task force#Jury vote tables
822:
712:
2240:
Some pictures in this section could really help out the article visually.
363:, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Knowledge articles about
2870:- was there anything else preventing this from promotion to GA status?
2752:
episode level, as that really gets into interpretation of motivations.
335:
304:
520:
2188:
the other Good Articles I mentioned provides a decent template here.
838:
Since the Survivor task force appears to be inactive, I'm notifying
840:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject Television/Reality television task force
267:
259:
69:
15:
562:
434:
414:
2802:
re: Individual episode articles - the amount of reception
737:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
627:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
2288:
I'd argue they need to be pretty small to retain focus.
2693:
giving an overview of the season's structure is ample.
2277:
Several grammar issues are within this section as well.
1295:
1257:
1216:. Feel free to make the changes yourself. Best Wishes,
620:
59:
214:
519:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
2514:I have added an image. There are several images at
769:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
659:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
553:This article has not yet received a rating on the
3151:and other media, where possible and appropriate.
2261:Again, there are some grammar issues to clean up.
2246:Future appearances subsection looks good as well.
2101:and other media, where possible and appropriate.
1825:Heya! I think I can lend a hand on this review! ~
87:for general discussion of the article's subject.
45:. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
371:. To improve this article, please refer to the
755:This message was posted before February 2018.
645:This message was posted before February 2018.
3156:(images are tagged and non-free content have
2106:(images are tagged and non-free content have
228:
8:
3262:Unknown-importance Episode coverage articles
3277:Low-importance Reality television articles
1727:
725:I have just modified one external link on
615:I have just modified one external link on
462:
299:
2365:That sounds good to me. Thank you much!
2566:Was there anything else I needed to do
1758:
1730:
464:
301:
3282:Reality television task force articles
718:External links modified (January 2018)
2088:This one doesn't seem to be an issue.
7:
3272:GA-Class Reality television articles
3267:Episode coverage task force articles
2452:This one looks mostly alright to me.
1377:particularly effected. Best Wishes,
513:This article is within the scope of
357:This article is within the scope of
273:
271:
828:Survivor jury vote table discussion
290:It is of interest to the following
77:for discussing improvements to the
3297:Unknown-importance Africa articles
3257:GA-Class Episode coverage articles
3252:Low-importance television articles
2194:I've made a bit of a change here.
1243:Which cells exactly? Best Wishes,
1132:2601:196:0:750:450D:26A6:5C9A:D5CC
14:
3307:Unknown-importance Kenya articles
729:. Please take a moment to review
619:. Please take a moment to review
446:the Reality television task force
41:. If you can improve it further,
3204:
3181:
3163:
3132:
3108:
3105:Fair representation without bias
3081:
3067:
3038:
3020:
3006:
2992:
2957:
2923:
2155:
2131:
2113:
2081:
2056:
2053:Fair representation without bias
2028:
2014:
1984:
1966:
1952:
1938:
1902:
1868:
574:
500:
490:
466:
381:Knowledge:WikiProject Television
344:
334:
303:
272:
99:Click here to start a new topic.
19:
3287:WikiProject Television articles
2893:for what the criteria are, and
2674:, I think both are worthwhile.
2602:Second Draft: Issues Unresolved
2406:, which still has a GA-status?
2029:
2015:
1953:
1903:
1869:
1847:for what the criteria are, and
1258:List of Survivor 42 contestants
1256:On things like the first table
1052:Talk:Survivor: Cook Islands/GA1
426:the Episode coverage task force
401:This article has been rated as
384:Template:WikiProject Television
2920:(prose, spelling, and grammar)
2783:The reason that I agree with @
2684:15:31, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
2665:12:27, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
2579:11:25, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
2532:Good thought! Thank you much!
2429:10:46, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
2416:04:23, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
2392:15:03, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
2334:section of the season summary.
2179:First Draft: Issues Unresolved
1865:(prose, spelling, and grammar)
29:has been listed as one of the
1:
3242:Media and drama good articles
3218:04:29, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
2556:11:38, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
2477:11:38, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
2375:18:44, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
2361:11:38, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
2226:11:38, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
2203:11:38, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
587:This article is supported by
527:and see a list of open tasks.
443:This article is supported by
423:This article is supported by
96:Put new text under old text.
33:Media and drama good articles
3247:GA-Class television articles
3205:
3182:
3164:
3133:
3109:
3082:
3068:
3039:
3021:
3007:
2993:
2958:
2924:
2879:18:35, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
2156:
2132:
2114:
2082:
2057:
1985:
1967:
1939:
823:00:09, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
533:Knowledge:WikiProject Africa
3317:WikiProject Africa articles
2853:02:13, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
2835:02:07, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
2820:01:18, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
2798:01:16, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
2765:00:42, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
2747:21:03, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
2722:20:26, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
2705:20:22, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
2594:00:54, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
2542:06:08, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
2528:00:58, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
2510:22:57, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
2494:14:22, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
2379:These have now been culled
2347:16:26, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
2301:14:06, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
1821:20:25, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
862:Contestant result confusion
536:Template:WikiProject Africa
104:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
3333:
3312:WikiProject Kenya articles
2900:
1678:22:46, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
1651:22:20, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
1637:22:18, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
1622:07:58, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
1608:21:45, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
1593:15:11, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
1580:14:36, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
1561:21:56, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
1534:02:01, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
1506:12:57, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
1484:12:49, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
1448:08:30, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
1433:01:49, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
1415:01:41, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
1401:15:11, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
1386:08:40, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
1372:23:37, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
1355:21:37, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
1342:20:52, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
1327:20:36, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
1311:19:34, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
1270:18:40, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
1252:09:40, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
1239:08:52, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
1225:08:36, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
1208:07:27, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
1173:08:49, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
1157:06:53, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
1140:01:05, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
1116:12:14, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
1094:09:40, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
1078:08:47, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
1063:07:01, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
1046:06:38, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
1023:04:36, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
998:04:19, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
983:23:39, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
961:23:59, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
857:16:37, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
786:(last update: 5 June 2024)
722:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
676:(last update: 5 June 2024)
612:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
555:project's importance scale
407:project's importance scale
1796:Talk:Survivor: Africa/GA1
947:20:57, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
920:07:48, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
903:07:45, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
877:07:25, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
713:18:34, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
570:
552:
485:
442:
422:
400:
329:
298:
134:Be welcoming to newcomers
3292:GA-Class Africa articles
1719:03:03, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
1006:The old format violated
3302:GA-Class Kenya articles
3237:Knowledge good articles
3158:non-free use rationales
2913:reasonably well written
2108:non-free use rationales
1858:reasonably well written
1701:01:21, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
832:There is a proposal at
608:External links modified
2897:for what they are not)
2516:Shaba National Reserve
1851:for what they are not)
1212:It will, but there is
1130:They look hideous now
567:
439:
419:
360:WikiProject Television
280:This article is rated
129:avoid personal attacks
57:: December 12, 2022. (
3145:It is illustrated by
3097:neutral point of view
3053:broad in its coverage
2095:It is illustrated by
2045:neutral point of view
2000:broad in its coverage
1832:Good Article Criteria
1148:before. Best Wishes,
566:
438:
418:
375:for the type of work.
154:Neutral point of view
39:good article criteria
2804:for a single episode
767:regular verification
657:regular verification
159:No original research
909:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS
757:After February 2018
647:After February 2018
387:television articles
369:join the discussion
365:television programs
3129:No edit wars, etc.
2972:factually accurate
2214:Currently unadded
2078:No edit wars, etc.
1918:factually accurate
811:InternetArchiveBot
762:InternetArchiveBot
701:InternetArchiveBot
652:InternetArchiveBot
568:
516:WikiProject Africa
440:
420:
286:content assessment
140:dispute resolution
101:
3213:ThadeusOfNazereth
3176:suitable captions
2987:reference section
2126:suitable captions
1933:reference section
1786:
1785:
1688:User:Lee Vilenski
843:
787:
677:
605:
604:
601:
600:
597:
596:
590:WikiProject Kenya
461:
460:
457:
456:
352:Television portal
266:
265:
120:Assume good faith
97:
68:
67:
64:
3324:
3216:
3208:
3207:
3185:
3184:
3167:
3166:
3136:
3135:
3112:
3111:
3085:
3084:
3071:
3070:
3042:
3041:
3024:
3023:
3010:
3009:
3001:reliable sources
2996:
2995:
2961:
2960:
2927:
2926:
2875:
2845:
2812:
2757:
2743:
2714:
2701:
2657:
2575:
2552:
2490:
2473:
2425:
2403:Survivor: Borneo
2388:
2357:
2297:
2222:
2199:
2159:
2158:
2135:
2134:
2117:
2116:
2085:
2084:
2060:
2059:
2032:
2031:
2018:
2017:
1988:
1987:
1970:
1969:
1956:
1955:
1947:reliable sources
1942:
1941:
1906:
1905:
1872:
1871:
1740:Copyvio detector
1728:
1696:
1674:
1647:
1618:
1589:
1498:
1480:
1425:
1382:
1351:
1307:
1248:
1221:
1203:
1153:
1108:
1090:
1059:
1035:
1015:
969:New table layout
935:
916:
899:
854:
847:
837:
821:
812:
785:
784:
763:
727:Survivor: Africa
711:
702:
675:
674:
653:
617:Survivor: Africa
584:
579:
578:
577:
541:
540:
537:
534:
531:
510:
505:
504:
503:
494:
487:
486:
481:
470:
463:
389:
388:
385:
382:
379:
373:style guidelines
354:
349:
348:
338:
331:
330:
325:
322:
316:Episode coverage
307:
300:
283:
277:
276:
275:
268:
260:
233:
232:
218:
149:Article policies
79:Survivor: Africa
70:
62:
60:Reviewed version
51:
27:Survivor: Africa
23:
16:
3332:
3331:
3327:
3326:
3325:
3323:
3322:
3321:
3227:
3226:
3211:
3172:appropriate use
3094:It follows the
2873:
2843:
2810:
2755:
2741:
2712:
2699:
2655:
2644:
2615:Season Summary
2604:
2573:
2550:
2488:
2471:
2448:Voting history
2423:
2386:
2355:
2295:
2220:
2197:
2181:
2172:
2122:appropriate use
2042:It follows the
1834:
1790:This review is
1782:
1754:
1726:
1692:
1672:
1669:. Best Wishes,
1645:
1616:
1587:
1496:
1478:
1423:
1380:
1349:
1305:
1246:
1219:
1199:
1151:
1106:
1088:
1057:
1029:
1013:
971:
933:
914:
911:. Best Wishes,
897:
884:Manual of Style
864:
850:
845:
830:
815:
810:
778:
771:have permission
761:
735:this simple FaQ
720:
705:
700:
668:
661:have permission
651:
625:this simple FaQ
610:
580:
575:
573:
539:Africa articles
538:
535:
532:
529:
528:
506:
501:
499:
476:
386:
383:
380:
377:
376:
350:
343:
323:
313:
284:on Knowledge's
281:
262:
261:
256:
175:
170:
169:
168:
145:
115:
58:
12:
11:
5:
3330:
3328:
3320:
3319:
3314:
3309:
3304:
3299:
3294:
3289:
3284:
3279:
3274:
3269:
3264:
3259:
3254:
3249:
3244:
3239:
3229:
3228:
3225:
3224:
3223:
3222:
3221:
3220:
3192:
3191:
3190:
3189:
3188:
3143:
3142:
3141:
3140:
3139:
3119:
3118:
3117:
3116:
3115:
3092:
3091:
3090:
3089:
3088:
3049:
3048:
3047:
3046:
3045:
2999:(citations to
2968:
2967:
2966:
2965:
2964:
2904:Vocem Virtutis
2899:
2898:
2881:
2868:Vocem Virtutis
2864:
2863:
2862:
2861:
2860:
2859:
2858:
2857:
2856:
2855:
2827:Vocem Virtutis
2790:Vocem Virtutis
2781:
2776:
2775:
2774:
2773:
2772:
2771:
2770:
2769:
2768:
2767:
2736:
2727:
2726:
2725:
2724:
2695:Vocem Virtutis
2687:
2686:
2643:
2640:
2639:
2638:
2630:
2629:
2622:
2621:
2613:
2612:
2603:
2600:
2599:
2598:
2597:
2596:
2586:Vocem Virtutis
2568:Vocem Virtutis
2564:
2563:
2562:
2561:
2560:
2559:
2558:
2534:Vocem Virtutis
2502:Vocem Virtutis
2497:
2496:
2482:
2481:
2480:
2479:
2463:
2462:
2454:
2453:
2446:
2445:
2444:
2443:
2442:
2441:
2440:
2439:
2438:
2437:
2436:
2435:
2434:
2433:
2432:
2431:
2381:Vocem Virtutis
2367:Vocem Virtutis
2339:Vocem Virtutis
2335:
2331:
2327:
2322:
2319:
2315:
2306:
2305:
2304:
2303:
2282:
2278:
2275:
2267:
2266:
2262:
2259:
2256:
2248:
2247:
2244:
2241:
2238:
2231:
2230:
2229:
2228:
2208:
2207:
2206:
2205:
2189:
2180:
2177:
2171:
2170:First Thoughts
2168:
2167:
2166:
2165:
2164:
2163:
2162:
2143:
2142:
2141:
2140:
2139:
2093:
2092:
2091:
2090:
2089:
2068:
2067:
2066:
2065:
2064:
2040:
2039:
2038:
2037:
2036:
1996:
1995:
1994:
1993:
1992:
1945:(citations to
1914:
1913:
1912:
1911:
1910:
1853:
1852:
1833:
1830:
1827:Vocem Virtutis
1807:Vocem Virtutis
1801:
1800:
1784:
1783:
1781:
1780:
1775:
1770:
1764:
1761:
1760:
1756:
1755:
1753:
1752:
1750:External links
1747:
1742:
1736:
1733:
1732:
1725:
1722:
1711:SeosiWrestling
1706:
1705:
1704:
1703:
1694:ApprenticeWiki
1663:
1662:
1661:
1660:
1659:
1658:
1657:
1656:
1655:
1654:
1653:
1567:
1566:
1565:
1564:
1563:
1548:
1547:
1546:
1545:
1544:
1543:
1542:
1541:
1540:
1539:
1538:
1537:
1536:
1491:Super Bowl LVI
1467:
1466:
1465:
1464:
1463:
1462:
1461:
1460:
1459:
1458:
1457:
1456:
1455:
1454:
1453:
1452:
1451:
1450:
1329:
1289:
1288:
1287:
1286:
1285:
1284:
1283:
1282:
1281:
1280:
1279:
1278:
1277:
1276:
1275:
1274:
1273:
1272:
1201:ApprenticeWiki
1186:
1185:
1184:
1183:
1182:
1181:
1180:
1179:
1178:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1128:
1127:
1126:
1125:
1124:
1123:
1122:
1121:
1120:
1119:
1118:
1096:
1001:
1000:
970:
967:
966:
965:
964:
963:
953:47.138.105.171
924:
923:
922:
869:76.190.196.224
863:
860:
829:
826:
805:
804:
797:
750:
749:
741:Added archive
719:
716:
695:
694:
687:
640:
639:
631:Added archive
609:
606:
603:
602:
599:
598:
595:
594:
586:
585:
569:
559:
558:
551:
545:
544:
542:
525:the discussion
512:
511:
495:
483:
482:
471:
459:
458:
455:
454:
451:Low-importance
441:
431:
430:
421:
411:
410:
403:Low-importance
399:
393:
392:
390:
356:
355:
339:
327:
326:
324:Low‑importance
308:
296:
295:
289:
278:
264:
263:
254:
252:
251:
248:
247:
235:
234:
172:
171:
167:
166:
161:
156:
147:
146:
144:
143:
136:
131:
122:
116:
114:
113:
102:
93:
92:
89:
88:
82:
66:
65:
50:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3329:
3318:
3315:
3313:
3310:
3308:
3305:
3303:
3300:
3298:
3295:
3293:
3290:
3288:
3285:
3283:
3280:
3278:
3275:
3273:
3270:
3268:
3265:
3263:
3260:
3258:
3255:
3253:
3250:
3248:
3245:
3243:
3240:
3238:
3235:
3234:
3232:
3219:
3214:
3210:
3209:
3202:
3199:
3198:
3196:
3193:
3187:
3186:
3179:
3177:
3173:
3161:
3159:
3153:
3152:
3150:
3149:
3144:
3138:
3137:
3130:
3127:
3126:
3124:
3120:
3114:
3113:
3106:
3103:
3102:
3100:
3098:
3093:
3087:
3086:
3079:
3077:
3065:
3063:
3062:major aspects
3057:
3056:
3054:
3050:
3044:
3043:
3036:
3034:
3030:
3018:
3016:
3004:
3002:
2990:
2988:
2982:
2981:
2979:
2978:
2973:
2969:
2963:
2962:
2955:
2953:
2949:
2945:
2941:
2937:
2933:
2921:
2917:
2916:
2914:
2910:
2909:
2908:
2905:
2896:
2892:
2888:
2886:
2882:
2880:
2877:
2876:
2869:
2866:
2865:
2854:
2850:
2846:
2838:
2837:
2836:
2832:
2828:
2823:
2822:
2821:
2817:
2813:
2805:
2801:
2800:
2799:
2795:
2791:
2786:
2782:
2778:
2777:
2766:
2762:
2758:
2750:
2749:
2748:
2745:
2744:
2737:
2733:
2732:
2731:
2730:
2729:
2728:
2723:
2719:
2715:
2708:
2707:
2706:
2703:
2702:
2696:
2691:
2690:
2689:
2688:
2685:
2681:
2677:
2673:
2668:
2667:
2666:
2662:
2658:
2650:
2646:
2645:
2641:
2635:
2634:
2633:
2627:
2626:
2625:
2618:
2617:
2616:
2609:
2608:
2607:
2601:
2595:
2591:
2587:
2582:
2581:
2580:
2577:
2576:
2569:
2565:
2557:
2554:
2553:
2545:
2544:
2543:
2539:
2535:
2531:
2530:
2529:
2525:
2521:
2517:
2513:
2512:
2511:
2507:
2503:
2499:
2498:
2495:
2492:
2491:
2484:
2483:
2478:
2475:
2474:
2467:
2466:
2465:
2464:
2459:
2458:
2457:
2451:
2450:
2449:
2430:
2427:
2426:
2419:
2418:
2417:
2413:
2409:
2405:
2404:
2399:
2395:
2394:
2393:
2390:
2389:
2382:
2378:
2377:
2376:
2372:
2368:
2364:
2363:
2362:
2359:
2358:
2350:
2349:
2348:
2344:
2340:
2336:
2332:
2328:
2325:
2323:
2320:
2316:
2312:
2311:
2310:
2309:
2308:
2307:
2302:
2299:
2298:
2291:
2287:
2286:
2283:
2279:
2276:
2272:
2271:
2270:
2263:
2260:
2257:
2253:
2252:
2251:
2245:
2242:
2239:
2236:
2235:
2234:
2227:
2224:
2223:
2216:
2215:
2213:
2212:
2211:
2204:
2201:
2200:
2193:
2192:
2190:
2186:
2185:
2184:
2178:
2176:
2169:
2161:
2160:
2153:
2150:
2149:
2147:
2144:
2137:
2136:
2129:
2127:
2123:
2111:
2109:
2103:
2102:
2100:
2099:
2094:
2087:
2086:
2079:
2076:
2075:
2073:
2069:
2062:
2061:
2054:
2051:
2050:
2048:
2046:
2041:
2034:
2033:
2026:
2024:
2012:
2010:
2009:major aspects
2004:
2003:
2001:
1997:
1990:
1989:
1982:
1980:
1976:
1964:
1962:
1950:
1948:
1936:
1934:
1928:
1927:
1925:
1924:
1919:
1915:
1908:
1907:
1900:
1898:
1894:
1890:
1886:
1882:
1878:
1866:
1862:
1861:
1859:
1855:
1854:
1850:
1846:
1842:
1840:
1836:
1835:
1831:
1829:
1828:
1823:
1822:
1818:
1815:
1812:
1808:
1805:
1799:
1797:
1793:
1788:
1787:
1779:
1776:
1774:
1771:
1769:
1766:
1765:
1763:
1762:
1757:
1751:
1748:
1746:
1743:
1741:
1738:
1737:
1735:
1734:
1729:
1723:
1721:
1720:
1716:
1712:
1702:
1699:
1697:
1695:
1689:
1685:
1684:accessibility
1681:
1680:
1679:
1676:
1675:
1668:
1664:
1652:
1649:
1648:
1640:
1639:
1638:
1634:
1630:
1625:
1624:
1623:
1620:
1619:
1611:
1610:
1609:
1605:
1601:
1596:
1595:
1594:
1591:
1590:
1583:
1582:
1581:
1577:
1573:
1568:
1562:
1558:
1554:
1549:
1535:
1531:
1527:
1523:
1522:
1521:
1520:
1519:
1518:
1517:
1516:
1515:
1514:
1513:
1512:
1511:
1510:
1509:
1508:
1507:
1503:
1499:
1492:
1488:
1487:
1486:
1485:
1482:
1481:
1473:
1449:
1445:
1441:
1440:Fyunck(click)
1436:
1435:
1434:
1430:
1426:
1418:
1417:
1416:
1412:
1408:
1407:Fyunck(click)
1404:
1403:
1402:
1398:
1394:
1389:
1388:
1387:
1384:
1383:
1375:
1374:
1373:
1369:
1365:
1364:Fyunck(click)
1360:
1359:
1358:
1357:
1356:
1353:
1352:
1345:
1344:
1343:
1339:
1335:
1334:Fyunck(click)
1330:
1328:
1324:
1320:
1319:Fyunck(click)
1315:
1314:
1313:
1312:
1309:
1308:
1300:
1297:
1294:It's a mess.
1292:
1271:
1267:
1263:
1262:Fyunck(click)
1259:
1255:
1254:
1253:
1250:
1249:
1242:
1241:
1240:
1236:
1232:
1231:Fyunck(click)
1228:
1227:
1226:
1223:
1222:
1215:
1214:WP:NODEADLINE
1211:
1210:
1209:
1206:
1204:
1202:
1196:
1195:
1194:
1193:
1192:
1191:
1190:
1189:
1188:
1187:
1174:
1170:
1166:
1165:Fyunck(click)
1162:
1161:
1160:
1159:
1158:
1155:
1154:
1147:
1143:
1142:
1141:
1137:
1133:
1129:
1117:
1113:
1109:
1102:
1097:
1095:
1092:
1091:
1083:
1082:
1081:
1080:
1079:
1075:
1071:
1070:Fyunck(click)
1066:
1065:
1064:
1061:
1060:
1053:
1049:
1048:
1047:
1043:
1039:
1038:Fyunck(click)
1033:
1028:
1027:
1026:
1025:
1024:
1020:
1016:
1009:
1005:
1004:
1003:
1002:
999:
995:
991:
987:
986:
985:
984:
980:
976:
968:
962:
958:
954:
950:
949:
948:
944:
940:
936:
930:
925:
921:
918:
917:
910:
906:
905:
904:
901:
900:
893:
889:
885:
881:
880:
879:
878:
874:
870:
861:
859:
858:
855:
853:
848:
841:
835:
827:
825:
824:
819:
814:
813:
802:
798:
795:
791:
790:
789:
782:
776:
772:
768:
764:
758:
753:
748:
744:
740:
739:
738:
736:
732:
728:
723:
717:
715:
714:
709:
704:
703:
692:
688:
685:
681:
680:
679:
672:
666:
662:
658:
654:
648:
643:
638:
634:
630:
629:
628:
626:
622:
618:
613:
607:
592:
591:
583:
572:
565:
561:
560:
556:
550:
547:
546:
543:
526:
522:
518:
517:
509:
508:Africa portal
498:
496:
493:
489:
488:
484:
480:
475:
472:
469:
465:
452:
449:(assessed as
448:
447:
437:
433:
432:
428:
427:
417:
413:
412:
408:
404:
398:
395:
394:
391:
374:
370:
366:
362:
361:
353:
347:
342:
340:
337:
333:
332:
328:
321:
317:
312:
309:
306:
302:
297:
293:
287:
279:
270:
269:
250:
249:
246:
243:
241:
237:
236:
231:
227:
224:
221:
217:
213:
209:
206:
203:
200:
197:
194:
191:
188:
185:
181:
178:
177:Find sources:
174:
173:
165:
164:Verifiability
162:
160:
157:
155:
152:
151:
150:
141:
137:
135:
132:
130:
126:
123:
121:
118:
117:
111:
107:
106:Learn to edit
103:
100:
95:
94:
91:
90:
86:
80:
76:
72:
71:
61:
56:
55:
48:
44:
40:
36:
35:
34:
28:
25:
22:
18:
17:
3200:
3194:
3169:
3155:
3146:
3128:
3122:
3104:
3095:
3073:
3059:
3052:
3026:
3012:
2998:
2984:
2975:
2971:
2929:
2919:
2912:
2901:
2883:
2874:Lee Vilenski
2871:
2803:
2785:Lee Vilenski
2780:information.
2742:Lee Vilenski
2739:
2700:Lee Vilenski
2697:
2671:
2648:
2631:
2623:
2614:
2606:Contestants
2605:
2574:Lee Vilenski
2571:
2551:Lee Vilenski
2548:
2489:Lee Vilenski
2486:
2472:Lee Vilenski
2469:
2456:Controversy
2455:
2447:
2424:Lee Vilenski
2421:
2401:
2397:
2387:Lee Vilenski
2384:
2356:Lee Vilenski
2353:
2296:Lee Vilenski
2293:
2268:
2249:
2233:Contestants
2232:
2221:Lee Vilenski
2218:
2209:
2198:Lee Vilenski
2195:
2182:
2173:
2151:
2145:
2119:
2105:
2096:
2077:
2071:
2052:
2043:
2020:
2006:
1999:
1972:
1958:
1944:
1930:
1921:
1917:
1874:
1864:
1857:
1837:
1824:
1813:
1803:
1802:
1789:
1778:Instructions
1707:
1693:
1673:Lee Vilenski
1670:
1646:Lee Vilenski
1643:
1617:Lee Vilenski
1614:
1600:82.24.78.193
1588:Lee Vilenski
1585:
1572:82.24.78.193
1479:Lee Vilenski
1476:
1468:
1381:Lee Vilenski
1378:
1350:Lee Vilenski
1347:
1306:Lee Vilenski
1303:
1301:
1293:
1290:
1247:Lee Vilenski
1244:
1220:Lee Vilenski
1217:
1200:
1152:Lee Vilenski
1149:
1145:
1100:
1089:Lee Vilenski
1086:
1058:Lee Vilenski
1055:
975:NintendoGeek
972:
928:
915:Lee Vilenski
912:
898:Lee Vilenski
895:
865:
851:
831:
809:
806:
781:source check
760:
754:
751:
724:
721:
699:
696:
671:source check
650:
644:
641:
614:
611:
588:
582:Kenya portal
514:
444:
424:
402:
358:
292:WikiProjects
238:
225:
219:
211:
204:
198:
192:
186:
176:
148:
73:This is the
52:
43:please do so
31:
30:
26:
2944:word choice
2652:details. --
2274:whatsoever.
1889:word choice
1792:transcluded
1629:Miss HollyJ
937:(she/her •
202:free images
85:not a forum
3231:Categories
3033:plagiarism
2977:verifiable
2642:Discussion
2632:Reception
2330:with time.
2290:WP:VG/PLOT
2255:summary.).
2217:Now added
1979:plagiarism
1923:verifiable
1745:Authorship
1731:GA toolbox
1146:unreadable
1144:They were
934:Sammi Brie
888:MOS:ACCESS
818:Report bug
708:Report bug
378:Television
311:Television
37:under the
3201:Pass/Fail
2624:Episodes
2408:George Ho
2269:Episodes
2210:Overview
2152:Pass/Fail
1804:Reviewer:
1768:Templates
1759:Reviewing
1724:GA Review
1472:WP:CRUFTy
1008:WP:ACCESS
892:WP:COLOUR
886:, mostly
801:this tool
794:this tool
691:this tool
684:this tool
142:if needed
125:Be polite
75:talk page
3215:(he/him)
2672:Survivor
1817:contribs
1773:Criteria
846:Schazjmd
807:Cheers.—
697:Cheers.—
282:GA-class
240:Archives
110:get help
83:This is
81:article.
47:reassess
3195:Overall
3076:focused
3029:copyvio
2948:fiction
2146:Overall
2023:focused
1975:copyvio
1893:fiction
731:my edit
621:my edit
405:on the
320:Reality
208:WP refs
196:scholar
3148:images
3123:stable
3121:It is
3099:policy
3051:It is
2970:It is
2950:, and
2940:layout
2911:It is
2887:review
2676:Bgsu98
2611:merge.
2520:Bgsu98
2398:Africa
2098:images
2072:stable
2070:It is
2047:policy
1998:It is
1916:It is
1895:, and
1885:layout
1856:It is
1841:review
1553:Bgsu98
1526:Bgsu98
1393:Bgsu98
1099:color
990:AddMLR
929:accent
852:(talk)
530:Africa
521:Africa
474:Africa
288:scale.
180:Google
54:Review
3174:with
2952:lists
2889:(see
2265:vote.
2183:Lead
2124:with
1897:lists
1843:(see
1794:from
1032:Masem
479:Kenya
223:JSTOR
184:books
138:Seek
3031:and
2974:and
2936:lead
2934:for
2895:here
2891:here
2844:asem
2831:talk
2811:asem
2794:talk
2756:asem
2713:asem
2680:talk
2656:asem
2590:talk
2538:talk
2524:talk
2506:talk
2412:talk
2371:talk
2343:talk
1977:and
1920:and
1881:lead
1879:for
1849:here
1845:here
1811:talk
1715:talk
1633:talk
1604:talk
1576:talk
1557:talk
1530:talk
1497:asem
1444:talk
1424:asem
1411:talk
1397:talk
1368:talk
1338:talk
1323:talk
1296:here
1266:talk
1235:talk
1169:talk
1136:talk
1107:asem
1101:once
1074:talk
1042:talk
1014:asem
1010:. --
994:talk
979:talk
957:talk
890:and
873:talk
216:FENS
190:news
127:and
2932:MoS
2902:As
2649:but
2396:If
1877:MoS
775:RfC
745:to
665:RfC
635:to
549:???
397:Low
230:TWL
49:it.
3233::
3203::
3197::
3180::
3168:b
3162::
3154:a
3131::
3125:.
3107::
3101:.
3080::
3072:b
3066::
3058:a
3055:.
3037::
3025:d
3019::
3015:OR
3011:c
3005::
2997:b
2991::
2983:a
2980:.
2956::
2946:,
2942:,
2938:,
2928:b
2922::
2918:a
2915:.
2885:GA
2851:)
2833:)
2818:)
2796:)
2763:)
2720:)
2682:)
2663:)
2592:)
2570:?
2540:)
2526:)
2508:)
2414:)
2383:.
2373:)
2345:)
2154::
2148::
2130::
2118:b
2112::
2104:a
2080::
2074:.
2055::
2049:.
2027::
2019:b
2013::
2005:a
2002:.
1983::
1971:d
1965::
1961:OR
1957:c
1951::
1943:b
1937::
1929:a
1926:.
1901::
1891:,
1887:,
1883:,
1873:b
1867::
1863:a
1860:.
1839:GA
1819:)
1717:)
1635:)
1606:)
1578:)
1559:)
1532:)
1504:)
1446:)
1431:)
1420:--
1413:)
1399:)
1370:)
1340:)
1325:)
1268:)
1237:)
1171:)
1138:)
1114:)
1076:)
1044:)
1021:)
996:)
981:)
959:)
945:)
941:•
875:)
788:.
783:}}
779:{{
678:.
673:}}
669:{{
477::
453:).
318:/
314::
210:)
108:;
63:).
3178:)
3170:(
3160:)
3078:)
3074:(
3064:)
3060:(
3035:)
3027:(
3017:)
3013:(
3003:)
2989:)
2985:(
2954:)
2930:(
2849:t
2847:(
2842:M
2829:(
2816:t
2814:(
2809:M
2792:(
2761:t
2759:(
2754:M
2718:t
2716:(
2711:M
2678:(
2661:t
2659:(
2654:M
2588:(
2536:(
2522:(
2504:(
2410:(
2369:(
2341:(
2128:)
2120:(
2110:)
2025:)
2021:(
2011:)
2007:(
1981:)
1973:(
1963:)
1959:(
1949:)
1935:)
1931:(
1899:)
1875:(
1814:·
1809:(
1713:(
1631:(
1602:(
1574:(
1555:(
1528:(
1502:t
1500:(
1495:M
1442:(
1429:t
1427:(
1422:M
1409:(
1395:(
1366:(
1336:(
1321:(
1264:(
1233:(
1167:(
1134:(
1112:t
1110:(
1105:M
1072:(
1040:(
1034::
1030:@
1019:t
1017:(
1012:M
992:(
977:(
955:(
943:c
939:t
871:(
820:)
816:(
803:.
796:.
710:)
706:(
693:.
686:.
593:.
557:.
429:.
409:.
294::
245:1
242::
226:·
220:·
212:·
205:·
199:·
193:·
187:·
182:(
112:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
