1092:
through to the final word. Just by way of example, under the subsection "Government", the article claims "the chief executive is typically a member of the local ethnic group while the party general secretary is non-local and usually Han
Chinese." This may well be correct, but it requires a direct and reliable source - if such a source cannot be located and verified, the offending sentence should be deleted. This is consistent with website-wide Knowledge guidelines. There are many very important claims made by contributors to this page which have no sources whatsoever, beyond just this one example. And again, I am *not* saying that these are incorrect - but they need to be backed up by sources. "Common sense" or "what I read in the paper at some point" are not sources, and cannot back up claims like this. Stricter moderation of claims and sources is required here. This article needs a thorough comb run through it in order to verify many claims here because, again, 'common sense' or 'what everyone knows' are not valid bases for a platform like this. (
1221:
representative of their people to some extent. Yet, the quote (which I couldn't find in his book btw) is being used to present the opposite view, that China's government is not representative of its people. This is a misrepresentation of his work, and is not the central thesis of his book. As I pointed out, on page 13 is where he presents his thesis for his book, which is the part of the book I quoted. I'm not sure how it's "more relevant" to use an out of context line of his work to make the opposite point of the central thesis of his book. I don't know when or how it was decided that he should be given a mention in the lead of the article, but it's wrong to misrepresent his work to suggest the opposite of what his book is about. Either the book being referenced should be taken for what it argues, or it shouldn't be in the lead at all. But the current situation where a quote (that I haven't yet verified is even in this work being cited) is being used out of context to suggest the opposite of the author's main thesis.
1410:
USA is divided into 50 states, each with their own executive, judicial and legislative administrations. How do elections work? In the USA, elections can be direct or indirect, with elections only for the legislative and executive branches, with judicial roles being appointed. What are the political factions in the USA? The factions are generally divided between liberals and conservatives, with a focus on social policies, the liberals are generally regarded as more progressive socially, and being found mostly on the democratic party, with the republicans representing the conservatives (this section could go even further on factionalism).
299:
229:
875:
economic performance and cultural tradition are not entirely irrelevant, they are a relatively small part of the explanation for why political trust is so high in China. In fact, our ongoing analysis of more recent public opinion survey data suggests that such responsiveness accounts for more than 50 percent of the variation in political trust. In other words, government responsiveness is by far the most important reason for the high level of political trust in China.
289:
262:
869:
indicate an absence of public political demand. While it is true that, on average, satisfaction with the national government is high, it is by no means perfect, or monolithic. In fact, about 65 percent of the public in China reports at least some degree of dissatisfaction with the central government. This dissatisfaction appears to be ālistened toā by the
Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which claims to represent the interests of āmostā Chinese people.
418:
397:
365:
428:
1008:
794:
directly by or at a minimum, reviewed and edited by someone in PRC. You can tell by the tone, word choice, poor translations, and of course, the pro-China, at worst "nuetral," never negative, bias in articles. I think the neutral bias is fine - I'd rather the articles be present, and let the reader be aware that they are reading something that is being presented by a
Chinese author, with their bias.
613:
1375:, the observations about the factions are generally very conflicting and contradictory (i.e., one news will say this official is part of this faction, but another report will disagree). Additionally, it's harder to get reporting of factions under the Xi era due to his consolidation of power, and removal of the old factions, leading observers to focus more on Xi and less on other officials.
523:
502:
533:
220:
1409:
Here is an example of a few interesting topics, and how they would apply to an article about the USA. How is the power balance between the three powers? In the US, the judicial has a slight advantage, due to a more broad constitution and their permanent titles. How do administrative regions work? The
1405:
There are many times chinese elections are discredited, giving way to a tyrannical view of the government, even though this is a much more complicated issue. It should be expected of an article all about chinese politics to actually explore the nuances of their electoral system, and how it plays into
1401:
Although it is stated that the communist party is rooted in many of the country's institutions, this is never clarified with specifics, resorting to low quality reference bombing as a way of creating the illusion of thoroughly researched statements. China is a deeply bureaucratic state, and I believe
1200:
At least one line in this article (alleging vast human rights abuses on the part of China) cites
Freedom House as its only source. Freedom House is a source that even this very wiki states is known to be state-funded and to declare the fake elections of right wing dictatorships to be "free and fair".
1091:
I have no particular problem with this article, but I worry as I read it that there are many very bold and quite important claims that the average reader might take as stone-cold fact which are not backed up by any actual source. This starts within the first few sentences of the article and continues
687:
Im finding that often on
Chinese articles, in a sense. Its becoming hard to find actual criticism of the CCP, when there is in fact plenty to be had. This should be corrected for the affect of balance, as it can be stated that the CCP has done much good, but also a lot of bad. And its becoming harder
1448:
I agree with the overall sentiment. I favor a 'Politics of X' approach that focuses on concrete discussion of government mechanisms, political institutions, and other structures. I favor an approach that is more focused on 'nuts and bolts' and less focused on characterizations, which are a perennial
1413:
In an attempt to fearmonger, all profound analysis of real politics inside of china have been thrown to the sidelines, and
Although I myself am not unbiased, I believe in Knowledge's mission of neutrality, and this is a clear example of a violation of this. I wish for this talk page to be a place to
868:
At first glance, it is counter-intuitive that an authoritarian government needs to respond to public opinion, since authoritarian leaders do not have to face any meaningful elections at the national level. However, our research demonstrates that an absence of meaningful national elections does not
793:
Wikipedians... it should not be surprising to you that
Knowledge, as the single most popular English-language site for reading about anything, including China, might be monitored and edited by folks with a pro-China stance. I assume nearly everything in all China-related articles is either written
668:
The last few paragraph's of the article's intro (beginning with "China practices a form of democracy that it calls socialist consultative democracy.") are written strangely. That paragraph in particular keeps repeating itself. The rest of the intro is oddly pro-Chinese, talking about the merits of
1146:
Seems like the editors don't really do their homework and relying on shallow stereotypes. Like ie - China does have elections on a local level where people can vote for their local reps. Also it's not one party system. They technically have more than one political party in government albeit the
1220:
If you read the source, Rory Truex's book's thesis is to argue against the idea that China's government is not representative. Instead, in the quote I provided, he provides his central thesis of his book, which is that China (and other governments he classifies as "authoritarian") are in fact
874:
Lacking elections as an effective yardstick to measure such representativeness, the CCP is paranoid about every single protestor on the street. While resorting to coercive methods whenever necessary, it also feels compelled to respond to public demand when possible. Thus, while media control,
1397:
This page is filled with bias, as well as not being clear in specifying the state of the internal politics of China. In the introduction, there is a clear focus on semantic issues, using the official one party state denomination as a clear demonstration of the authoritarian nature of their
778:
Why are
Chinese sources considered unreliable but not something like Freedom House, which is still cited in the article. And how is this more biased than the sentence directly before the Freedom House citation flatly defining the Chinese political system as "authoritarian"?
708:
sound oddly condescending, and most of the sources are from sources like The China Daily, which is owned by the CCP. I have nor time neither the experience to clean up the article, nor do I want to engage in drive by tagging, but this seems like an candidate for
705:
However, elections are also an element in socialist consultative democracy, even though the People's
Republic of China is often erroneously criticized in the West for not having elections. This error likely stems from a misunderstanding of the PRC's election
760:
I straightened out the section's language to make clear what was opinion. It's still not an adequate account, but what's there is NPOV. I removed the "better source" tags and made clear that these official sources are good for stating official views.
1433:
I just happened to read this article and came to the Talk page immediately after with the same concerns you laid out. The tone of this article as written is not
Knowledge's neutral voice. I don't know enough to help rework it, but I support doing so
233:
1370:
Thanks for tagging me Amigao. I began adding information about the factions, will continue to add later. The main problem with writing about the factions is that due to the extreme lack of information on what is going on inside the
1496:
625:
153:
1486:
728:
I went ahead and marked some sources as unreliable, hope this doesn't go to far, and I apologize if this is tag-bombing, I really don't have the expertise to actually fix most of the articles issues.
1501:
1061:
Civil society is something that has yet to be touch upon on this page. I added a new section but will need lots of help on developing it further. Maybe it should even have its own Knowledge page?
1516:
1258:
1123:
949:
147:
1268:
1526:
1452:
I do not know how much specific feedback you will get on this Talk page. It is probably best to begin making some edits to make some of these suggestions more concrete.
379:
1248:
1531:
1511:
345:
1189:
1172:
1018:
has an RFC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the
1406:
the wider bureaucracy, instead of focusing on social policies, which don't have as big of an impact on internal/external politics as the base system in itself.
1561:
579:
1521:
589:
79:
1546:
1481:
1402:
an article about Chinese politics cannot attempt to separate itself either from internal factionalism or the bureaucratic hierarchy installed within.
645:
484:
474:
44:
1566:
1506:
1491:
908:
The role of president has very little de facto power. (but de Jura has power due to generally also being general secretary of communist party)
1551:
1152:
893:
374:
355:
272:
85:
923:
673:
555:
1352:, so that's clearly a gap that needs filling. There's a template for CCP factions but there is not a stand-alone article about the topic.
1556:
1536:
450:
1541:
1334:
1163:
Its not just the strongest, it appoints the leadership of the other parties and controls them entirely... So yes, a one party system.
975:
1311:
1148:
889:
858:
Actually that is the reason why the government has such high trust from its citizens. According to research done by The Diplomat -
321:
190:
1314:
is closely related. Has this information been moved to a subsidiary article, or is there some other reason it has been omitted?
168:
1476:
546:
507:
99:
30:
1414:
discuss a more fundamental change in this and other articles, establishing some sort of standard for "politics of x" articles
135:
1076:
441:
402:
104:
20:
1177:
Also just FYI you added a source article entitled "What America's flawed democracy could learn from China's one-party rule"
1254:
74:
942:
1280:
1131:
986:
957:
242:
1264:
1185:
1168:
312:
267:
65:
1206:
1116:
784:
320:
related articles on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
185:
129:
688:
for some reason to find any of the bad in these articles... So, yes. I agree. There seems to be some bias here..
199:
1244:
1240:
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:
919:
677:
125:
1112:
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
1380:
1349:
1276:
1127:
982:
953:
863:
Indeed, one of the less noticed political realities in China is government responsiveness to public demand.
109:
1180:
with the edit summary "Added more top sources" so it seems that not even you believe your own horseshit...
1330:
1230:
1181:
1164:
1097:
1047:
which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. ā
915:
175:
1457:
1439:
1226:
1202:
780:
693:
248:
1201:
There's no way that Chinese sources can be deleted and called biased while this is allowed to remain.
880:
1419:
1064:
1029:
1020:
911:
848:
844:
805:
748:
744:
733:
729:
718:
714:
837:
The linked Knowledge article disputes the fact that the consensus is generally accepted, citing the
672:
I definitively second this notion. This opening seciton reads, borderline, like propaganda. Kyle C.
219:
637:
633:
161:
55:
1294:
The main internal force shaping Chinese politics seem to be the clashes between Xi's faction (the
554:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
449:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1376:
1353:
1072:
653:
616:
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between
204:
70:
971:
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
141:
1345:
1325:
1093:
799:
288:
261:
51:
24:
1453:
1435:
1361:
1348:, you make a good point. There's nothing of substance on factionalism in this article or in
1222:
838:
830:
689:
538:
201:
1299:
1295:
1025:
1014:
996:
433:
938:
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
826:
427:
417:
396:
364:
1470:
1236:
Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion
1108:
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
1068:
1048:
1000:
766:
649:
629:
795:
710:
304:
1057:
New Section on Civil Society, possible individual page for Civil Society in China?
1372:
1357:
1318:
1307:
981:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. ā
612:
1275:
Participate in the deletion discussions at the nomination pages linked above. ā
669:"consultative democracy" and rebutting the notion that China isn't democratic.
1430:
1415:
1044:
743:
I'm creating a couple of sections of specific points to link to in templates.
528:
423:
294:
1398:
government, even though factionalism is deeply rooted in the party's system.
203:
551:
1461:
1443:
1423:
1384:
1365:
1339:
1284:
1210:
1157:
1135:
1101:
1080:
1051:
1033:
990:
961:
927:
898:
852:
809:
788:
770:
752:
737:
722:
697:
681:
657:
762:
446:
833:"; thus, each claims sovereignty over the entire territory of the other.
532:
522:
501:
1303:
967:
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
821:
In addition, the People's Republic of China and the Republic of China (
822:
881:
https://thediplomat.com/2013/06/government-for-the-people-in-china/
317:
934:
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
1497:
Knowledge level-5 vital articles in Society and social sciences
213:
205:
15:
363:
1321:
failing to mention the Republican and Democratic parties.
1487:
Knowledge vital articles in Society and social sciences
1178:
160:
1502:
B-Class vital articles in Society and social sciences
607:
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
550:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
445:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
316:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1302:), and to a lesser extent other group memberships:
1517:B-Class China-related articles of Top-importance
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
819:
1290:Near-total lack of realpolitik in the article?
1122:Participate in the deletion discussion at the
948:Participate in the deletion discussion at the
174:
8:
1215:
1043:There is a move discussion in progress on
909:
803:
496:
391:
256:
1216:Rory Truex's book is being misrepresented
646:Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment
1527:Top-importance Chinese politics articles
1147:dominant party is by far the strongest.
644:Above undated message substituted from
498:
393:
258:
217:
1532:WikiProject Chinese politics articles
1512:Top-importance China-related articles
703:I also second this. Some lines, like
7:
664:Oddly-written intro, potential bias?
544:This article is within the scope of
439:This article is within the scope of
310:This article is within the scope of
247:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
1562:High-importance socialism articles
621:
617:
14:
1522:B-Class Chinese politics articles
1312:Generations of Chinese leadership
1547:Low-importance politics articles
1482:Knowledge level-5 vital articles
1356:may also find this of interest.
1196:Freedom House is a biased source
1006:
624:. Further details are available
611:
531:
521:
500:
426:
416:
395:
297:
287:
260:
227:
218:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
584:This article has been rated as
564:Knowledge:WikiProject Socialism
479:This article has been rated as
350:This article has been rated as
1567:WikiProject Socialism articles
1507:B-Class China-related articles
1492:B-Class level-5 vital articles
810:15:59, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
567:Template:WikiProject Socialism
459:Knowledge:WikiProject Politics
1:
1552:WikiProject Politics articles
1462:17:13, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
1444:12:04, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
1424:04:25, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
1231:05:43, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
1158:19:25, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
1136:11:23, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
899:19:27, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
698:03:37, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
558:and see a list of open tasks.
462:Template:WikiProject Politics
453:and see a list of open tasks.
372:This article is supported by
324:and see a list of open tasks.
42:Put new text under old text.
1340:18:28, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
1285:10:08, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
1190:15:48, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
1173:15:45, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
1149:WesternChristianitytestballi
1034:23:22, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
976:Zhao Leji official image.jpg
890:WesternChristianitytestballi
658:06:52, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
375:WikiProject Chinese politics
1385:08:09, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
1366:04:24, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
1298:) and Jiang's faction (the
1039:Move discussion in progress
904:is China semi-presidential?
330:Knowledge:WikiProject China
50:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
1583:
1557:B-Class socialism articles
1537:WikiProject China articles
1393:Proposal For a Page Rework
1211:17:54, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
1052:09:17, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
928:19:43, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
853:13:25, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
789:17:48, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
753:13:25, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
738:18:58, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
723:20:20, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
590:project's importance scale
485:project's importance scale
356:project's importance scale
333:Template:WikiProject China
1542:B-Class politics articles
991:23:07, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
962:12:07, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
682:20:51, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
583:
516:
478:
411:
371:
349:
282:
255:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
1449:source of disagreements.
1141:So many things are wrong
1102:04:10, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
1081:01:17, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
1350:Chinese Communist Party
1255:Wang Huning en 2022.png
771:19:44, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
1477:B-Class vital articles
943:Zhao Leji Portrait.jpg
835:
368:
336:China-related articles
75:avoid personal attacks
1265:Zhao Leji en 2022.png
628:. Student editor(s):
547:WikiProject Socialism
367:
234:level-5 vital article
100:Neutral point of view
829:that there is only "
442:WikiProject Politics
105:No original research
1317:This would be like
1277:Community Tech bot
1128:Community Tech bot
983:Community Tech bot
954:Community Tech bot
632:. Peer reviewers:
626:on the course page
570:socialism articles
369:
243:content assessment
86:dispute resolution
47:
1338:
1245:Li Xi en 2022.png
1067:comment added by
930:
914:comment added by
812:
604:
603:
600:
599:
596:
595:
495:
494:
491:
490:
465:politics articles
390:
389:
386:
385:
313:WikiProject China
212:
211:
66:Assume good faith
43:
25:Politics of China
1574:
1328:
1203:FlamesThePhoenix
1182:Horse Eye's Back
1165:Horse Eye's Back
1083:
1010:
1009:
839:Taiwan consensus
781:FlamesThePhoenix
660:
623:
619:
615:
572:
571:
568:
565:
562:
541:
539:Socialism portal
536:
535:
525:
518:
517:
512:
504:
497:
467:
466:
463:
460:
457:
436:
431:
430:
420:
413:
412:
407:
399:
392:
338:
337:
334:
331:
328:
307:
302:
301:
300:
291:
284:
283:
278:
275:
264:
257:
240:
231:
230:
223:
222:
214:
206:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
1582:
1581:
1577:
1576:
1575:
1573:
1572:
1571:
1467:
1466:
1395:
1300:Shanghai clique
1296:Tsinghua clique
1292:
1238:
1218:
1198:
1156:
1143:
1124:nomination page
1110:
1089:
1087:General sources
1062:
1059:
1041:
1021:discussion page
1015:Uyghur genocide
1011:
1007:
1004:
997:Uyghur genocide
969:
950:nomination page
936:
906:
901:
876:
870:
864:
818:
666:
643:
618:18 January 2021
609:
586:High-importance
569:
566:
563:
560:
559:
537:
530:
511:Highāimportance
510:
464:
461:
458:
455:
454:
434:Politics portal
432:
425:
405:
335:
332:
329:
326:
325:
303:
298:
296:
276:
270:
241:on Knowledge's
238:
228:
208:
207:
202:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
1580:
1578:
1570:
1569:
1564:
1559:
1554:
1549:
1544:
1539:
1534:
1529:
1524:
1519:
1514:
1509:
1504:
1499:
1494:
1489:
1484:
1479:
1469:
1468:
1465:
1464:
1450:
1446:
1394:
1391:
1390:
1389:
1388:
1387:
1291:
1288:
1273:
1272:
1262:
1252:
1237:
1234:
1217:
1214:
1197:
1194:
1193:
1192:
1175:
1145:
1142:
1139:
1120:
1119:
1109:
1106:
1088:
1085:
1058:
1055:
1040:
1037:
1005:
1003:
994:
979:
978:
968:
965:
946:
945:
935:
932:
916:LordWikiMaster
905:
902:
887:
873:
867:
862:
827:1992 Consensus
817:
816:1992 consensus
814:
808:comment added
776:
775:
774:
773:
741:
740:
701:
700:
674:70.169.248.254
665:
662:
638:Marisa Balades
634:Varshanekkanti
608:
605:
602:
601:
598:
597:
594:
593:
582:
576:
575:
573:
556:the discussion
543:
542:
526:
514:
513:
505:
493:
492:
489:
488:
481:Low-importance
477:
471:
470:
468:
451:the discussion
438:
437:
421:
409:
408:
406:Lowāimportance
400:
388:
387:
384:
383:
380:Top-importance
370:
360:
359:
352:Top-importance
348:
342:
341:
339:
322:the discussion
309:
308:
292:
280:
279:
277:Topāimportance
265:
253:
252:
246:
224:
210:
209:
200:
198:
197:
194:
193:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1579:
1568:
1565:
1563:
1560:
1558:
1555:
1553:
1550:
1548:
1545:
1543:
1540:
1538:
1535:
1533:
1530:
1528:
1525:
1523:
1520:
1518:
1515:
1513:
1510:
1508:
1505:
1503:
1500:
1498:
1495:
1493:
1490:
1488:
1485:
1483:
1480:
1478:
1475:
1474:
1472:
1463:
1459:
1455:
1451:
1447:
1445:
1441:
1437:
1432:
1428:
1427:
1426:
1425:
1421:
1417:
1411:
1407:
1403:
1399:
1392:
1386:
1382:
1378:
1377:The Account 2
1374:
1369:
1368:
1367:
1363:
1359:
1355:
1354:The Account 2
1351:
1347:
1344:
1343:
1342:
1341:
1336:
1332:
1327:
1322:
1320:
1315:
1313:
1309:
1305:
1301:
1297:
1289:
1287:
1286:
1282:
1278:
1270:
1266:
1263:
1260:
1256:
1253:
1250:
1246:
1243:
1242:
1241:
1235:
1233:
1232:
1228:
1224:
1213:
1212:
1208:
1204:
1195:
1191:
1187:
1183:
1179:
1176:
1174:
1170:
1166:
1162:
1161:
1160:
1159:
1154:
1150:
1140:
1138:
1137:
1133:
1129:
1125:
1118:
1115:
1114:
1113:
1107:
1105:
1103:
1099:
1095:
1086:
1084:
1082:
1078:
1074:
1070:
1066:
1056:
1054:
1053:
1050:
1046:
1038:
1036:
1035:
1031:
1027:
1024:. Thank you.
1023:
1022:
1017:
1016:
1002:
998:
995:
993:
992:
988:
984:
977:
974:
973:
972:
966:
964:
963:
959:
955:
951:
944:
941:
940:
939:
933:
931:
929:
925:
921:
917:
913:
903:
900:
897:
895:
891:
886:
884:
883:
882:
877:
871:
865:
860:
859:
855:
854:
850:
846:
842:
840:
834:
832:
828:
824:
815:
813:
811:
807:
801:
797:
791:
790:
786:
782:
772:
768:
764:
759:
758:
757:
756:
755:
754:
750:
746:
739:
735:
731:
727:
726:
725:
724:
720:
716:
712:
707:
699:
695:
691:
686:
685:
684:
683:
679:
675:
670:
663:
661:
659:
655:
651:
647:
641:
639:
635:
631:
627:
614:
606:
591:
587:
581:
578:
577:
574:
557:
553:
549:
548:
540:
534:
529:
527:
524:
520:
519:
515:
509:
506:
503:
499:
486:
482:
476:
473:
472:
469:
452:
448:
444:
443:
435:
429:
424:
422:
419:
415:
414:
410:
404:
401:
398:
394:
381:
378:(assessed as
377:
376:
366:
362:
361:
357:
353:
347:
344:
343:
340:
323:
319:
315:
314:
306:
295:
293:
290:
286:
285:
281:
274:
269:
266:
263:
259:
254:
250:
244:
236:
235:
225:
221:
216:
215:
196:
195:
192:
189:
187:
183:
182:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
1412:
1408:
1404:
1400:
1396:
1346:CRGreathouse
1326:CRGreathouse
1323:
1316:
1293:
1274:
1239:
1219:
1199:
1144:
1121:
1111:
1094:KronosAlight
1090:
1063:āĀ Preceding
1060:
1042:
1019:
1013:
1012:
980:
970:
947:
937:
910:āĀ Preceding
907:
888:
885:
879:
878:
872:
866:
861:
857:
856:
843:
836:
825:) share the
820:
804:āĀ Preceding
792:
777:
742:
711:Template:POV
704:
702:
671:
667:
642:
610:
585:
545:
480:
440:
373:
351:
311:
305:China portal
249:WikiProjects
232:
184:
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
1454:JArthur1984
1436:SmoothAmber
1373:Zhongnanhai
1319:US politics
1308:princelings
1223:JasonMacker
690:SageSolomon
622:14 May 2021
148:free images
31:not a forum
1471:Categories
1269:discussion
1259:discussion
1249:discussion
1045:Talk:China
1026:Mikehawk10
845:Tijmen Wil
745:Tijmen Wil
730:Tijmen Wil
715:Tijmen Wil
831:One China
561:Socialism
552:socialism
508:Socialism
237:is rated
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
1077:contribs
1069:Serinali
1065:unsigned
1049:RMCD bot
924:contribs
912:unsigned
650:PrimeBOT
630:Serinali
456:Politics
447:politics
403:Politics
273:Politics
186:Archives
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
1310:, etc.
1304:Tuanpai
1117:čµµä¹é
.jpg
999:has an
806:undated
796:Bryanfw
706:system.
588:on the
483:on the
354:on the
239:B-class
154:WPĀ refs
142:scholar
1358:Amigao
823:Taiwan
245:scale.
126:Google
1431:Nknka
1416:Nknka
327:China
318:China
268:China
226:This
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
1458:talk
1440:talk
1420:talk
1381:talk
1362:talk
1281:talk
1227:talk
1207:talk
1186:talk
1169:talk
1153:talk
1132:talk
1098:talk
1073:talk
1030:talk
987:talk
958:talk
920:talk
894:talk
849:talk
800:talk
785:talk
767:talk
749:talk
734:talk
719:talk
694:talk
678:talk
654:talk
620:and
580:High
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
1126:. ā
1001:RFC
952:. ā
802:)
648:by
475:Low
346:Top
176:TWL
1473::
1460:)
1442:)
1422:)
1383:)
1364:)
1333:|
1324:-
1306:,
1283:)
1229:)
1209:)
1188:)
1171:)
1134:)
1104:)
1100:)
1079:)
1075:ā¢
1032:)
989:)
960:)
926:)
922:ā¢
851:)
841:.
787:)
769:)
763:ch
751:)
736:)
721:)
713:.
696:)
680:)
656:)
640:.
636:,
382:).
271::
156:)
54:;
1456:(
1438:(
1429:@
1418:(
1379:(
1360:(
1337:)
1335:c
1331:t
1329:(
1279:(
1271:)
1267:(
1261:)
1257:(
1251:)
1247:(
1225:(
1205:(
1184:(
1167:(
1155:)
1151:(
1130:(
1096:(
1071:(
1028:(
985:(
956:(
918:(
896:)
892:(
847:(
798:(
783:(
765:(
747:(
732:(
717:(
692:(
676:(
652:(
592:.
487:.
358:.
251::
191:1
188::
172:Ā·
166:Ā·
158:Ā·
151:Ā·
145:Ā·
139:Ā·
133:Ā·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
