Knowledge

Talk:Postage stamps of Batum under British occupation

Source 📝

318:, describes six series of forgeries of these stamps. There are a number of small differences that distinguish the genuine from the forgeries. As shown in the images below (the central one is an enlargment of the 1 ruble stamp in the article), the bottom line of the numeral one in the lower left is straight, but bent downward in the forger. The dots surrounding the value tablets, lower right and left, also differ. This is pehaps most obvious in the upper right corner of the left value tablet; in the genuine there is a round dot. In the forgery, there are two dots run together to form a long, misshapen oval. See Ceresa, pp. 26, 41-42. 74: 53: 187: 166: 84: 197: 22: 357: 337: 419:
that is not true, the first set is quite scarce, the third was printed in much higher numbers, but even those stamps are not common. also, all devices were destroyed when the british left batum after 2 years, no stamps were printed at a later time
279:
The 50 rubles overprint stamp is one of the common forgeries of this overprint (Scott no. 43). As R. J. Ceresa notes, "This is the most highly forged of all Batum issues ..."
477: 257: 247: 373:
It should not be surprising that the group of four aloe tree stamps overprinted "BRITISH OCCUPATION" also are forgeries. They belong to a group described by Ceresa,
482: 472: 223: 462: 148: 138: 467: 210: 171: 457: 114: 426:
all stamps (tree and russion overprints) have been forged quite intensively. most of the stamps you see on ebay these days are forgeries.
415:
Despite the short period of British rule, the tree stamps exist in large numbers (probably additional ones were printed after the : -->
347: 406:, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section. 97: 58: 429:
phialtelic literature exists from Dr. R.J.Ceresa as well as from Mr. Barefoot. Also the rossica society published an article.
416:
occupation was over), but the overprinted Russian stamps are not common, and in 2003 some commanded prices of over $ 500 USD.
377:
which have the "S" (and "H") slightly larger than the other letters and the "N" too small. See Ceresa, id., p.p. 101-102.
33: 437: 386: 327: 304: 281:
The Postage Stamps of Russia, 1917-1923, Vol. 4, Transcaucasia, Parts 13-16, British Occupation of Batum, Section A
202: 21: 39: 434: 291:
and also have dots over the letter "i" in the English text, which reads "BRiTiSH OCCUPATiON". Ceresa,
222:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
113:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
382: 323: 300: 215: 283:, page 142. Genuine overprints have (among other characteristics) stops (or periods) after 109: 89: 73: 52: 451: 403: 423:
correct is: most of the overprinted russian stamps are scarcer than the tree stamps
186: 165: 445:
Last edited at 12:28, 8 June 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 03:17, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
378: 319: 296: 295:, page 142. This has none of these and is clearly one of the common forgeries. 356: 192: 79: 219: 103: 346: 336: 355: 345: 335: 412:
the pictures show forgeries, one picture has very bad quality
399:
Talk:Postage stamps of Batum under British occupation/Comments
15: 398: 314:
The 1 ruble "aloe tree" also is a forgery. Ceresa,
214:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 402:, and are posted here for posterity. Following 396:The comment(s) below were originally left at 8: 160: 47: 19: 478:Low-importance Georgia (country) articles 331: 232:Knowledge:WikiProject Georgia (country) 162: 49: 483:WikiProject Georgia (country) articles 235:Template:WikiProject Georgia (country) 473:Stub-Class Georgia (country) articles 7: 208:This article is within the scope of 95:This article is within the scope of 38:It is of interest to the following 14: 463:Low-importance Philately articles 404:several discussions in past years 195: 185: 164: 82: 72: 51: 20: 468:All WikiProject Philately pages 252:This article has been rated as 143:This article has been rated as 123:Knowledge:WikiProject Philately 126:Template:WikiProject Philately 1: 458:Stub-Class Philately articles 226:and see a list of open tasks. 211:WikiProject Georgia (country) 117:and see a list of open tasks. 369:British Occupation forgeries 499: 258:project's importance scale 238:Georgia (country) articles 149:project's importance scale 411: 251: 180: 142: 67: 46: 438:12:28, 8 June 2007 (UTC) 387:01:03, 6 June 2008 (UTC) 328:00:12, 6 June 2008 (UTC) 305:13:09, 3 June 2008 (UTC) 203:Georgia (country) portal 361: 351: 341: 28:This article is rated 359: 349: 339: 98:WikiProject Philately 392:Assessment comment 362: 352: 342: 129:Philately articles 34:content assessment 443: 442: 366: 365: 272: 271: 268: 267: 264: 263: 229:Georgia (country) 172:Georgia (country) 159: 158: 155: 154: 490: 409: 408: 401: 332: 240: 239: 236: 233: 230: 205: 200: 199: 198: 189: 182: 181: 176: 168: 161: 131: 130: 127: 124: 121: 110:stamp collecting 92: 90:Philately portal 87: 86: 85: 76: 69: 68: 63: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 498: 497: 493: 492: 491: 489: 488: 487: 448: 447: 397: 394: 371: 312: 310:Another forgery 277: 237: 234: 231: 228: 227: 201: 196: 194: 174: 128: 125: 122: 119: 118: 88: 83: 81: 61: 32:on Knowledge's 29: 12: 11: 5: 496: 494: 486: 485: 480: 475: 470: 465: 460: 450: 449: 441: 440: 393: 390: 370: 367: 364: 363: 353: 343: 311: 308: 276: 275:Common forgery 273: 270: 269: 266: 265: 262: 261: 254:Low-importance 250: 244: 243: 241: 224:the discussion 207: 206: 190: 178: 177: 175:Low‑importance 169: 157: 156: 153: 152: 145:Low-importance 141: 135: 134: 132: 115:the discussion 94: 93: 77: 65: 64: 62:Low‑importance 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 495: 484: 481: 479: 476: 474: 471: 469: 466: 464: 461: 459: 456: 455: 453: 446: 439: 436: 433: 430: 427: 424: 421: 417: 410: 407: 405: 400: 391: 389: 388: 384: 380: 376: 368: 358: 354: 348: 344: 338: 334: 333: 330: 329: 325: 321: 317: 309: 307: 306: 302: 298: 294: 290: 286: 282: 274: 259: 255: 249: 246: 245: 242: 225: 221: 217: 213: 212: 204: 193: 191: 188: 184: 183: 179: 173: 170: 167: 163: 150: 146: 140: 137: 136: 133: 116: 112: 111: 106: 105: 100: 99: 91: 80: 78: 75: 71: 70: 66: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 444: 435:145.253.2.29 431: 428: 425: 422: 418: 413: 395: 374: 372: 315: 313: 297:User:Ecphora 292: 288: 284: 280: 278: 253: 209: 144: 108: 102: 96: 40:WikiProjects 452:Categories 375:see above, 287:and after 30:Stub-class 316:see above 220:Georgians 120:Philately 104:philately 59:Philately 432:hth sb 379:Ecphora 360:Forgery 350:Forgery 340:Genuine 320:Ecphora 256:on the 216:Georgia 147:on the 36:scale. 414:: --> 293:supra 285:БАТУМ 383:talk 324:talk 301:talk 218:and 107:and 289:ОБЛ 248:Low 139:Low 454:: 385:) 326:) 303:) 381:( 322:( 299:( 260:. 151:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Philately
WikiProject icon
Philately portal
WikiProject Philately
philately
stamp collecting
the discussion
Low
project's importance scale
WikiProject icon
Georgia (country)
WikiProject icon
Georgia (country) portal
WikiProject Georgia (country)
Georgia
Georgians
the discussion
Low
project's importance scale
User:Ecphora
talk
13:09, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Ecphora
talk
00:12, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.