351:
328:
314:
283:
259:
232:
222:
197:
183:
169:
138:
124:
448:
I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow folks to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns, and let me know one of those places when the issues have been addressed. If I may suggest that you strike out, check mark, or otherwise
407:
Critical reception, first paragraph, first sentence, you mention the two performers who collaborated, but never say who they are or what they did. Also, this whole paragraph sounds like opinion, but it isn't stated whose opinion is being given. From the sourcing, it looks like a review by Joel Brito?
544:
I went through and did a copyedit for some passive voice as well as other convoluted phrasing. I see the extraneous album covers have been removed (Thanks Daniel, for bringing that to our attention!) and unless Daniel has some other objections, I'll feel pretty comfortable with passing this for GA
525:
I will need help about this issue (passive to active), and about the cities I think is important to name them, since (for the
Mexican cities) there are very important cities on the list, but another cities are not that big, that is why I wanted to describe the mini-tour with all the cities.
425:
Album section, third paragraph, first sentence. The "instead of employing multiple composers and producers from previous albums..." I think you mean "instead of employing multiple composers and producers as in previous albums, ..." which reads correctly.
370:
Album history, second paragraph, "Despite this, he made live performances in very important cities..." Suggest rewording to "Despite this, he made live performances in the
Mexican cities of (list cities) and the American cities (List cities)."
566:
Since all issues are taken care of, I'll pass this article as GA now. I strongly suggest a peer review if you're thinking of trying for FA status, I'm only a so-so copyeditor, and the prose would benefit by a fresh pair of eyes.
476:
I was going to say the same thing (I had printed this out and was reviewing it as well). They have the same image, just with a different background color and cover text. They are not discussed in the article. They fail
445:
Overall, just a few concerns as mentioned above. I took the liberty of adjusting a few small things. Nice work, and after these concerns are addressed, I have no hesitation on passing it for GA.
449:
mark the items I've detailed, that will make it possible for me to see what's been addressed, and you can keep track of what's been done and what still needs to be worked on.
456:
The three images are nearly all identical, I do not believe they can all be supported by a fair use claim, they are near redundant images. —
66:
102:
96:
306:
62:
481:#8 pretty clearly and can just as easily be described in text. I would not pass this article for GA until those images are removed.
189:
47:
505:
those cities? "Major
American and Mexican cities" covers it quite well. And I'd go through the article and convert a lot of
39:
130:
155:
514:
531:
489:
434:
416:
396:
379:
296:
572:
550:
466:
388:
Critical reception, first paragraph "Two experienced performers..." Experienced sounds peacocky.
86:
55:
17:
478:
245:
510:
320:
527:
485:
430:
412:
392:
375:
175:
408:
Need to attribute the opinions to someone, and most of this paragraph reads as opinion.
568:
546:
506:
457:
82:
32:
575:
553:
535:
518:
493:
468:
438:
420:
400:
383:
89:
501:
Also, in describing the tour, is it really necessary to list
367:
A little bit of weasel wording going on, some examples:
74:
43:
8:
305:(images are tagged and non-free images have
7:
300:, where possible and appropriate.
24:
349:
326:
312:
281:
257:
254:Fair representation without bias
230:
220:
195:
181:
167:
136:
122:
81:I'll be reviewing this shortly.
1:
576:21:03, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
554:13:35, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
536:02:43, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
519:05:59, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
494:02:43, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
469:21:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
439:02:43, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
421:02:43, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
401:02:43, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
384:02:43, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
350:
327:
313:
282:
258:
231:
221:
196:
182:
168:
137:
123:
90:16:10, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
596:
545:within the next few days.
112:reasonably well written
319:(appropriate use with
294:It is illustrated by
246:neutral point of view
210:broad in its coverage
363:Specific concerns:
307:fair use rationales
151:factually accurate
321:suitable captions
278:No edit wars etc.
18:Talk:Para Siempre
587:
464:
353:
352:
330:
329:
316:
315:
285:
284:
261:
260:
234:
233:
224:
223:
199:
198:
185:
184:
176:reliable sources
171:
170:
140:
139:
126:
125:
79:
70:
51:
595:
594:
590:
589:
588:
586:
585:
584:
458:
243:It follows the
217:(major aspects)
60:
37:
31:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
593:
591:
583:
582:
581:
580:
579:
578:
559:
558:
557:
556:
539:
538:
499:
498:
497:
496:
451:
450:
446:
442:
441:
423:
405:
404:
403:
386:
361:
360:
359:
358:
357:
356:
337:
336:
335:
334:
333:
292:
291:
290:
289:
288:
268:
267:
266:
265:
264:
241:
240:
239:
238:
237:
206:
205:
204:
203:
202:
174:(citations to
147:
146:
145:
144:
143:
107:
106:
80:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
592:
577:
574:
570:
565:
564:
563:
562:
561:
560:
555:
552:
548:
543:
542:
541:
540:
537:
533:
529:
524:
523:
522:
520:
516:
512:
508:
507:passive voice
504:
495:
491:
487:
484:
480:
475:
474:
473:
472:
471:
470:
467:
465:
463:
462:
455:
447:
444:
443:
440:
436:
432:
429:
424:
422:
418:
414:
411:
406:
402:
398:
394:
391:
387:
385:
381:
377:
374:
369:
368:
366:
365:
364:
355:
354:
347:
344:
343:
341:
338:
332:
331:
324:
322:
310:
308:
302:
301:
299:
298:
293:
287:
286:
279:
276:
275:
273:
269:
263:
262:
255:
252:
251:
249:
247:
242:
236:
235:
228:
218:
214:
213:
211:
207:
201:
200:
193:
191:
179:
177:
165:
161:
160:
158:
157:
152:
148:
142:
141:
134:
132:
120:
116:
115:
113:
109:
108:
105:for criteria)
104:
100:
98:
94:
93:
92:
91:
88:
84:
78:
77:
73:
68:
64:
59:
58:
54:
49:
45:
41:
36:
35:
26:
19:
502:
500:
482:
460:
459:
453:
452:
427:
409:
389:
372:
362:
345:
339:
318:
304:
295:
277:
271:
253:
244:
226:
216:
209:
187:
173:
164:(references)
163:
154:
150:
128:
118:
111:
95:
75:
71:
57:Article talk
56:
52:
33:
30:
511:Daniel Case
509:to active.
44:visual edit
528:Jaespinoza
486:Jaespinoza
431:Jaespinoza
413:Jaespinoza
393:Jaespinoza
376:Jaespinoza
156:verifiable
346:Pass/Fail
227:(focused)
27:GA Review
569:Ealdgyth
547:Ealdgyth
83:Ealdgyth
454:Comment
340:Overall
119:(prose)
67:history
48:history
34:Article
297:images
272:stable
270:It is
248:policy
208:It is
149:It is
110:It is
99:review
101:(see
76:Watch
16:<
573:Talk
551:Talk
532:talk
515:talk
490:talk
483:Done
479:NFCC
435:talk
428:Done
417:talk
410:Done
397:talk
390:Done
380:talk
373:Done
153:and
103:here
87:Talk
63:edit
40:edit
521:.
503:all
131:MoS
571:-
549:-
534:)
517:)
492:)
437:)
419:)
399:)
382:)
348::
342::
325::
317:b
311::
303:a
280::
274:.
256::
250:.
229::
225:b
219::
215:a
212:.
194::
190:OR
186:c
180::
172:b
166::
162:a
159:.
135::
127:b
121::
117:a
114:.
97:GA
85:-
65:|
46:|
42:|
530:(
513:(
488:(
461:R
433:(
415:(
395:(
378:(
323:)
309:)
192:)
188:(
178:)
133:)
129:(
72:·
69:)
61:(
53:·
50:)
38:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.