Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:Pentax K1000

Source đź“ť

67: 49: 149: 131: 444:
same camera in M42 mount. But you have a DOF preview/power switch button and a better designed film advance lever. Stop down metering is an annoyance but it's the price to pay to you use M42 lenses. And I love M42 because there is a lot excellent M42 lenses that you can also use an almost any camera film or digital with the right adapter. So IMHO the Spotmatic F is also greater than the greatest.
219: 22: 357:
that because the feature was considered ingeniously handy, aftermarket adhesive-backed memo holders sprang up so that photographers could add one to cameras that didn't originally come with one. If you bought your K1000 used, I think the more likely scenario for why it has a memo holder is that the original owner applied one of these stick-on holders.
474:
A professional photographer could take 1000 film exposures in one busy workday (double that in the digital era). With an amateur level 50,000 cycle rating, the K1000 was simply not durable or rugged enough to keep up a professional pace for long. (During the 1980s, the professional level Nikon F3 and
478:
Instead of "durable," the K1000 was "reliable." According to the McGraw-Hill Encyclopedia of Science and Technology: "Reliability is the probability that an engineering system will perform its intended function satisfactorily (from the viewpoint of the customer) for its intended life under specified
317:
The entry states that the camera does not even have a film box end memo holder. Mine has - serial number 6020737 - this means a) the entry is wrong or b) some previous owner has gone to the trouble of prising one off another camera and sticking it on mine. Is it worth suggesting that this sentence
443:
I have one and I love it. But the K1000 lacks some very important features : a power switch and a DOF preview button. The KX & the KM are the same thing with more features. So they are greater than the greatest.  :-)) Well I love my K1000 but I prefer the Spotmatics a Spotmatic F is mostly the
356:
It is possible that Asahi Optical included a memo holder on some production batches over the K1000's long 21 year run – I don't have information detailed enough to confirm or refute that, except to say no book, manual or brochure I've seen mentions a factory produced memo slot. Instead, please note
346:
When the Pentax K-series was designed during the early 1970s, film box end memo holders were not a standard 35 mm SLR feature, and the KM and K1000 were introduced without one, although the K2 and KX did have one. (All of the M-series have a memo holder.) As late as their October 1977 issue, Modern
466:
In 1983, Modern Photography said: "When we say a camera is rugged, we mean that it's capable of taking a greater-than-average amount of physical abuse without breaking down. When we say a camera is durable we mean that it will tend to last longer than most cameras of its type without breaking down
389:
Well, yes and no. The whole K series(K2, KX, KM, and K1000) are all essentially Spotmatics with the K mount. More specifically, the KM is a Spotmatic F, the K1000 is an SP1000, the KX is an improved SP-F, and the K2 is an improved ES-II. In that way the KX can sort of be thought as the Ultimate
223: 374:
It seems that nowhere in the article it's stated that the K1000 is a K mount version of the Spotmatic SPII. Bodies looks similar and many part are exchangeable between the cameras. BTW I plan to replace the winding lever on mine by a SPII one that is more ergonomic, but was probably much more
467:
under conditions of average use, or will withstand a greater number of 'cycles of operation' (i.e., film wind and shutter release with film in the camera) while remaining within tolerance." (Anonymous "Too Hot To Handle." p 59.
490:. "Reliability, availability, and maintainability," Vol. 15, pp 353-359.) Because of its simplicity, there was little to go wrong at any given moment, making the K1000 pretty reliable – if not abused. 516: 328:
The one that I have (and currently selling) does not have a film box memo holder. It is SN#:8022442 ... Maybe it was only for specific models? Or maybe your's was added... hmmm...
422:
Too biased. I own one, but to say it's the greatest is nonsense. Also Pentax made some great camera's before and after the K1000, I mention the spotmatic, the LX and the MX.
66: 48: 573: 189: 195: 475:
Canon F-1N were rated at 150,000 and 100,000 abusive cycles, respectively.) Therefore, I have restored phrasing that it was not of professional level durability.
558: 107: 113: 578: 235: 165: 568: 347:
Photography magazine thought film reminder slots were still novel enough that it was explicitly pointed out in their test report on the Nikon FM.
563: 156: 136: 83: 553: 520: 429: 487: 406: 74: 54: 29: 222:
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available
35: 512: 425: 394: 277:
After pressing the rewind release button on the bottom of the camera and rewinding the film, of course. :)
433: 319: 259: 164:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
82:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
303: 293: 278: 227: 402: 495: 318:
should have a "citation required" marker until this earth-shattering matter is finally resolved?
243: 484: 333: 535:
Someone removed Japan as one of the places the K1000 was made. Weren't some made in Japan?
449: 398: 380: 148: 130: 302:
Fixed link from Pentax and added a link to a manual in color and .jpg instead of .pdf.
547: 491: 358: 269: 239: 536: 329: 218: 161: 509:
lot of talk on how the pentaprism can desilver, but I know nothing about this
445: 376: 292:
The link for the Pentax manual is broken. I will attempt to find a new link.
479:
environmental and operating conditions." (Licker, Mark D., publisher.
539: 524: 499: 453: 437: 410: 384: 361: 337: 322: 306: 296: 272: 262: 247: 79: 15: 268:
Pull up firmly on the rewind knob and the back will open.
28:
This article has not yet been rated on Knowledge (XXG)'s
258:
HoW DO YOU GET FILM OUT OF THE PENTAX K100?!??@!@@# --
462:
The K1000 did not have professional level durability.
213:
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
471:, Volume 47, Number 3; March 1983. ISSN 0026-8240.) 160:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 78:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 481:
McGraw-Hill Encyclopedia of Science and Technology.
194:This article has not yet received a rating on the 112:This article has not yet received a rating on the 483:9th Edition. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 2002. 8: 510: 125: 43: 21: 19: 236:Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment 574:Unknown-importance Photography articles 234:Above undated message substituted from 174:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Photography 127: 45: 517:2601:192:4700:1F70:5411:F177:5934:F4CC 7: 154:This article is within the scope of 72:This article is within the scope of 34:It is of interest to the following 559:Unknown-importance Brands articles 390:Spotmatic... along with the 6x7. 92:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Brands 14: 579:WikiProject Photography articles 217: 177:Template:WikiProject Photography 147: 129: 65: 47: 20: 569:Unassessed Photography articles 540:03:16, 21 September 2022 (UTC) 323:21:17, 20 September 2007 (UTC) 1: 525:03:40, 17 December 2021 (UTC) 338:08:40, 28 November 2007 (UTC) 168:and see a list of open tasks. 86:and see a list of open tasks. 454:00:14, 5 February 2008 (UTC) 438:23:16, 16 January 2008 (UTC) 411:16:23, 1 November 2008 (UTC) 385:20:15, 13 January 2008 (UTC) 362:18:37, 3 December 2007 (UTC) 248:06:21, 17 January 2022 (UTC) 564:WikiProject Brands articles 95:Template:WikiProject Brands 595: 554:Unassessed Brands articles 500:19:39, 25 March 2010 (UTC) 196:project's importance scale 114:project's importance scale 418:Greatest camera on earth? 307:22:09, 17 June 2007 (UTC) 297:22:00, 17 June 2007 (UTC) 273:16:25, 17 July 2006 (UTC) 263:18:02, 11 July 2006 (UTC) 193: 142: 111: 60: 42: 505:desilvering of petaprism 370:The K1000 is a Spotmatic 281:03:01 10 Aug 2006 (UTC) 157:WikiProject Photography 226:. Student editor(s): 375:expensive to build. 313:Film Box Memo Holder 180:Photography articles 469:Modern Photography 224:on the course page 75:WikiProject Brands 30:content assessment 527: 515:comment added by 440: 428:comment added by 414: 397:comment added by 254:How to Eject Film 210: 209: 206: 205: 202: 201: 124: 123: 120: 119: 586: 423: 413: 391: 250: 221: 182: 181: 178: 175: 172: 151: 144: 143: 133: 126: 100: 99: 96: 93: 90: 69: 62: 61: 51: 44: 25: 24: 23: 16: 594: 593: 589: 588: 587: 585: 584: 583: 544: 543: 533: 507: 464: 420: 392: 372: 315: 290: 256: 233: 215: 179: 176: 173: 170: 169: 98:Brands articles 97: 94: 91: 88: 87: 12: 11: 5: 592: 590: 582: 581: 576: 571: 566: 561: 556: 546: 545: 532: 531:Made in Japan? 529: 506: 503: 463: 460: 458: 419: 416: 371: 368: 367: 366: 365: 364: 351: 350: 349: 348: 341: 340: 314: 311: 310: 309: 289: 286: 285: 284: 283: 282: 255: 252: 214: 211: 208: 207: 204: 203: 200: 199: 192: 186: 185: 183: 166:the discussion 152: 140: 139: 134: 122: 121: 118: 117: 110: 104: 103: 101: 84:the discussion 70: 58: 57: 52: 40: 39: 33: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 591: 580: 577: 575: 572: 570: 567: 565: 562: 560: 557: 555: 552: 551: 549: 542: 541: 538: 530: 528: 526: 522: 518: 514: 504: 502: 501: 497: 493: 489: 488:0-07-913665-6 486: 482: 476: 472: 470: 461: 459: 456: 455: 451: 447: 441: 439: 435: 431: 427: 417: 415: 412: 408: 404: 400: 396: 387: 386: 382: 378: 369: 363: 360: 355: 354: 353: 352: 345: 344: 343: 342: 339: 335: 331: 327: 326: 325: 324: 321: 320:81.152.153.61 312: 308: 305: 301: 300: 299: 298: 295: 287: 280: 276: 275: 274: 271: 267: 266: 265: 264: 261: 260:65.92.124.174 253: 251: 249: 245: 241: 237: 231: 229: 225: 220: 212: 197: 191: 188: 187: 184: 167: 163: 159: 158: 153: 150: 146: 145: 141: 138: 135: 132: 128: 115: 109: 106: 105: 102: 85: 81: 77: 76: 71: 68: 64: 63: 59: 56: 53: 50: 46: 41: 37: 31: 27: 18: 17: 534: 511:— Preceding 508: 480: 477: 473: 468: 465: 457: 442: 430:213.46.18.88 421: 388: 373: 316: 304:Tommy.rousse 294:Tommy.rousse 291: 257: 232: 216: 155: 73: 36:WikiProjects 424:—Preceding 393:—Preceding 288:Broken Link 279:Sharpvisual 228:Cyberhero22 171:Photography 162:photography 137:Photography 548:Categories 399:Stevopedia 513:unsigned 492:Paul1513 426:unsigned 407:contribs 395:unsigned 359:Paul1513 270:Paul1513 240:PrimeBOT 537:Bubba73 330:Mazakar 89:Brands 80:brands 55:Brands 32:scale. 446:Ericd 377:Ericd 521:talk 496:talk 485:ISBN 450:talk 434:talk 403:talk 381:talk 334:talk 244:talk 238:by 190:??? 108:??? 550:: 523:) 498:) 452:) 436:) 409:) 405:• 383:) 336:) 246:) 230:. 519:( 494:( 448:( 432:( 401:( 379:( 332:( 242:( 198:. 116:. 38::

Index

content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Brands
WikiProject icon
WikiProject Brands
brands
the discussion
???
project's importance scale
WikiProject icon
Photography
WikiProject icon
WikiProject Photography
photography
the discussion
???
project's importance scale

on the course page
Cyberhero22
Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment
PrimeBOT
talk
06:21, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
65.92.124.174
18:02, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
Paul1513
16:25, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
Sharpvisual

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑