871:
accidentally exposed or something. "Significant" is also vague and subjective, so it's better to "show not tell" and give the actual number. Something like this would be less vague: "Epidemiological studies find the opposite response in humans; an exposure of X is statistically correlated with a Y increase in total cholesterol and a Z increase in LDL cholesterol." The rest of that sentence seems to assume that the relationship is causal, rather than allowing that correlation does not prove causation and saying something like: "If PFOS exposure actually causes higher cholesterol, this would indicate..." --
290:
269:
822:...especially, as a citation reference is given for that sentence. The entire point of the article is that there are undetermined correlations without established causality or mechanism; connections have been documented without the exact nature of them being known. This, necessarily, falls into the territory of "vagueness". Therefore, there is no reason to cast doubt upon a simple, self-evident statement (one which has a reference) by hanging a "vague" tag on it. Discussion?
1752:
warrant. Much of this can be condensed, removed, or moved to an article specific to PFAS litigation/regulation. The section on remediation needs a rewrite; it's not organized, it's unclear which technologies are in use and which are under research, or how well developed any of them are. I'm planning to start tackling these when I get a chance, but wanted to give people a chance to weigh in (or beat me to it!) in case there are any strong feelings about any of this.
673:
417:
396:
300:
709:
632:
582:
1441:
506:
485:
207:
238:
777:
self-published by C8SciencePanel.org. C8SciencePanel.org is registered anonymously, but appears to be owned by a plaintiff's law firm with a financial interest in PFAS litigation. Knowledge's editorial standards say that content "must be verifiable." The C8SciencePanel.org position papers are not verifiable. That Table should be deleted.
1419:. I don´t understand why the review (Houde M, Martin JW, Letcher RJ, Solomon KR, Muir DC (June 2006). "Biological monitoring of polyfluoroalkyl substances: A review". Environmental Science & Technology. 40 (11): 3463â3473) was removed; secondary sources are generally preferred in wp. Feel free to condense the text.
1239:
Of course: "It contains analysis, evaluation, interpretation, or synthesis of the facts, evidence, concepts, and ideas taken from primary sources". In this case the primary sources are the historical documents that they reviewed. It was published in a peer reviewed journal and is on PUBMED. So it is
861:
I don't think it's particularly required to be a medical expert in order to point out a phrase that is not clear to a general audience, but I do actually have a science background. Thanks for pointing out this thread, but it would be helpful to direct your comments to the merits of the text, rather
1751:
These three sections are pretty bloated. Health outcomes I think can be reduced to a single paragraph, rather than 7 subheadings. Same idea for litigation and regulation: there are quite a lot of details about litigation from individual US states that I think the breadth of this article does not
1578:
The quote from the article is "All legislation aimed at regulating toxic PFAS âforever chemicalsâ died in the
Democratic-controlled US Congress last session as companies flexed their lobbying muscle and bills did not gain enough Republican support to overcome a Senate filibuster." It doesn't say
870:
I don't have access to the referenced article, so I can't clarify whether the association is based on epidemiology that indicates a statistical correlation that may or may not indicate causation, medical studies that were testing PFOS as a treatment, or case reports from people who had just been
1289:âmanipulation of the research question to obtain predetermined results; funding and publishing research that supports industry interests; suppressing unfavorable research; distorting the public discourse about research; changing or setting scientific standards to serve corporate interests;"
776:
Echoing the previous comment, the page provides a Table titled "Probable links to health issues as identified by the C8 Science Panel." The Table lists position papers that did not meet the quality standards for publication in a reputable peer-reviewed scientific journal, and thus were
1722:. When using "PFASs", nobody would use "is" instead of "are". Furthermore, I've seen it several times, that people mistake "PFAS" to be a single chemical, similar to similar-looking acronyms such as PFOS, PFOA etc. This wouldn't happen if "PFASs" was used.
1594:
Even if well-sourced, the factoid may not merit inclusion in this article. It's not really about PFAS themselves. I don't know if this type of political information is appropriate for this article. (It doesn't sound like it belongs in an encyclopedia.)
1559:
Under the subheading of United States in the section titled "Concerns, litigation, and regulations in specific countries and regions" this statement is made: "but the
Republican Party, supported by the U.S. chemical industry filibustered the bill."
721:
190:
153:
1610:
You raise some interesting points. I agree that the article doesn't need a note about US legislation that didn't pass back in 2021. If we can get someone to second this point, then I'm in favor of removing the paragraph.
1453:
1263:
They also "developed deductive codes to assess industry influence". And this "development" is original work (primary research). The review element pertains to determining document dating, so far as I can see.
1284:
Drawing on the work of Bero and White , we deduced six codes from the cross-industry strategies of manipulation that researchers previously established to see whether the same practices emerge among the PFAS
1579:
that there was an actual filibuster. I take it to mean if there was a filibuster, there was not enough
Republican support to overcome it. So I agree that the wording in the article should be clarified.
1651:, as that seems to be more common in literature (and it's what the group I work with uses, so that helps). Whichever way it goes, a decision should be made and article updated to reflect that.
44:
147:
1519:
1647:
Article alternates between using PFAS as plural and PFASs. Should be standardized throughout. I see there was previously a RfC on this topic that did not lead to any changes.
1221:
The publisher categorize this as an "Original
Article", but PUBMED has it as a review. On inspection, it's a composite of both. So, the question is: is the cited material
728:
194:
1728:
1488:
The sections "Economic role" and "Estimated contemporary costs" partly cover the same topic. What about merging the contents in a section called "Socio-economic role"?
1831:
546:
556:
1672:. There are more instances of that being used over the other version, and I haven't seen any instances where PFAS was used to refer to something in the singular. â
1318:
Bits are primary and bits are secondary, as for many sources. However looking with that in mind the bits you added seem to be secondary, so there is not an issue.
198:
1806:
1724:
Initially, "PFASs" was used. A few years ago, there was a shift towards "PFAS". Recently, there has been a shift back to "PFASs" by
Organisations such as the UN
368:
1461:
378:
1816:
1725:
1091:
If you want to insert non-garbage-content, go ahead. But don't criticise legitimate cleanup of garbage sources (as you have before), as it's disruptive.
467:
457:
79:
1836:
522:
1710:
1826:
1821:
168:
135:
344:
1801:
1779:
1107:
85:
1193:
I see you reverted it simply stating "Primary sourcing". What do you mean exactly? The source is a high quality source as far as I can tell
1489:
513:
490:
433:
1023:
Considering environmental exposures to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) as risk factors for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy
1811:
1541:
1540:
Other than Teflon, that list isn't particularly meaningful to a non-chemist. Maybe list common products that contain these chemicals?
792:
590:
24:
1012:
129:
838:
317:
274:
651:
1059:
with the inappropriate comment "rmv. garbage". There are two 2023 review articles that cover at least major parts of the content:
1371:
687:
1563:
I read the article linked as support for this statement. It mentions filibuster once and does not state who did the filibuster.
125:
424:
401:
326:
99:
30:
104:
20:
175:
1683:
972:
Have you got a newer publication that is acceptable? If not, the one above should be sufficient to revert your removal. --
74:
312:
249:
65:
340:
206:
185:
1278:
The fact that a "novel" categorisation was used to classify the primary documents definitely does not make this a
679:
141:
1773:
Closing PFAS analytical gaps: Inter-method evaluation of total organofluorine techniques for AFFF-impacted water
740:
217:
1783:
942:
1493:
788:
1545:
1473:
1390:
1056:
928:
109:
1375:
330:
1568:
1520:âThis is Chernobylâ: Texas ranchers say âforever chemicalsâ in waste-based fertilizers ruined their land
1323:
1269:
1230:
1160:
1125:
1096:
986:
963:
784:
255:
1367:
A new documentary that was released a few days ago may be considered to be mentioned in the article:
780:
586:
334:
1716:
1291:
etc. They then used those codes to simply tag the documents they were reviewing to categorise them:
955:
333:
articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly
237:
1787:
1761:
1740:
1687:
1660:
1634:
1620:
1604:
1588:
1572:
1549:
1530:
1507:
1497:
1477:
1428:
1405:
1379:
1346:
1327:
1313:
1296:
1273:
1258:
1241:
1234:
1222:
1215:
1164:
1142:
1129:
1115:
1100:
1085:
1045:
1026:
999:
990:
976:
967:
949:
915:
898:
894:
880:
849:
831:
827:
807:
796:
322:
161:
55:
981:
Huh? That's not making sense. Could you say clearly in plain
English what you want to do exactly?
521:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
432:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1757:
1656:
1630:
1469:
1444:
This article was the subject of a Wiki
Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between
1424:
746:
305:
222:
70:
289:
268:
744:
221:
1679:
1600:
1279:
1135:
1064:
Occupational exposure and serum levels of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS): A review
51:
1771:
The following paper could be useful to improve and update the section on analytical methods:
1282:
source. The "deductive codes" refer to the categories they used to categorise the documents:
908:
1564:
1416:
1398:
1337:
1319:
1304:
1265:
1249:
1226:
1206:
1190:
1156:
1121:
1092:
982:
959:
936:
876:
761:
742:
708:
299:
219:
1035:
1526:
1412:
1394:
1198:
1148:
1018:. The following review articles might be helpful to draft a short section on that matter:
644:
1194:
416:
395:
1616:
1584:
890:
865:
845:. It seems to me that he is not an expert in the fields of epidemiology or medicine. --
823:
631:
518:
1073:
Occupational exposures to airborne per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS)âA review
958:
is a reasonable, but old, source in a changing field. What use should I be happy for?
1795:
1753:
1652:
1626:
1625:
I agree, not necessary for this article. Should also be removed from intro section.
1420:
1152:
1120:
The problem isn't the journal, it's
Knowledge content sourced to unreliable sources.
887:"Hypothyroidism is the most common thyroid abnormality associated with PFAS exposure"
820:
Hypothyroidism is the most common thyroid abnormality associated with PFAS exposure.
1673:
1596:
1457:
1393:
would need to be condensed considerably. The text includes general information on
1693:
1032:
Risk to human health related to the presence of perfluoroalkyl substances in food
818:
I strongly disagree with the necessity of hanging a "vague" tag on the sentence:
1440:
872:
842:
1076:
1067:
1747:
Condensing sections: adverse health outcomes, regulatory concerns, remediation
1709:"PFAS" is even sometimes used in singular, when actually the plural is meant,
1522:
1368:
295:
1776:
1737:
1612:
1580:
1504:
1402:
1139:
1112:
1082:
1042:
996:
973:
946:
912:
856:
846:
804:
505:
484:
429:
885:
Thanks for your reply, but my issue is with the wording, not the research.
911:
to check and to come up with a suggestion for rephrasing the sentence? --
1293:
We then analyzed the documents, coding for each of these strategies
1111:
is a garbage journal ⌠It's not a review article, but garbage?! --
683:
747:
702:
667:
572:
231:
223:
15:
1698:
any chemical with at least a perfluorinated methyl group (âCF
1299:. If you don't have further concerns would you self-revert?
1179:
Corporate and federal government suppression of information
1714:
Where PFAS is found at levels that exceed these standards
1484:
Merge "Economic role" and "Estimated contemporary costs"?
1186:
improving some content that had been removed in the past
995:
Typo fixed. Hence, you may now respond to the content. --
1187:
1184:
614:
608:
602:
596:
1195:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10237242/
160:
1369:
The Forever Chemical Scandal | Bloomberg Investigates
678:
On 24 May 2023, it was proposed that this article be
517:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
428:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
903:There is only one vague tag remaining (in section
1435:Wiki Education assignment: College Composition II
1503:Both sections (as such) do not exist anymore. --
1183:I have reintroduced a paragraph in this section
1015:Pregnancy-induced hypertension and pre-eclampsia
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
941:Would you be happy with the reference used in
755:This page has archives. Sections older than
174:
8:
1734:I do strongly prefer "PFASs" (with plural-s)
943:Gestational hypertension#cite_ref-Lo2013_4-0
1197:and the sourcing should be appropriate per
1013:removed the remaining parts of the section
1777:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hazl.2024.100122
1702:) or a perfluorinated methylene group (âCF
1411:Yes, we prefer wikilinks to concepts like
907:). Do you have access to the full text of
778:
639:Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
479:
390:
263:
1692:Even the OECD in its revised definition (
1730:, but also in the scientific literature.
1832:High-importance Science Policy articles
1649:I am partial to "PFAS" without plural s
481:
392:
321:to improve Knowledge's coverage of the
265:
235:
1719:
1713:
1697:
1295:. This falls well within the scope of
1292:
1288:
1283:
1108:Environmental Science & Technology
889:is not an especially vague statement.
803:That table was removed a while ago. --
765:when more than 5 sections are present.
7:
1807:High-importance Environment articles
1555:Unsupported statement in the article
1385:Bioaccumulation and biomagnification
531:Knowledge:WikiProject Science Policy
511:This article is within the scope of
422:This article is within the scope of
591:Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances
534:Template:WikiProject Science Policy
254:It is of interest to the following
25:Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances
23:for discussing improvements to the
1727:(incl. Stockholm Convention), OECD
1518:Which section does this go under?
1449:
1445:
14:
1817:Mid-importance Chemistry articles
1720:If PFAS is detected in your water
759:may be automatically archived by
353:Knowledge:WikiProject Environment
1837:Knowledge pages with to-do lists
1452:. Further details are available
1439:
1240:a reliable secondary source per
1051:Professional ski wax technicians
1027:doi:10.1016/j.envres.2021.111113
707:
671:
630:
580:
504:
483:
415:
394:
356:Template:WikiProject Environment
298:
288:
267:
236:
205:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
1827:C-Class Science Policy articles
1201:for that kind of information.
551:This article has been rated as
462:This article has been rated as
442:Knowledge:WikiProject Chemistry
373:This article has been rated as
1822:WikiProject Chemistry articles
1788:23:59, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
1762:03:38, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
1741:21:32, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
1688:01:58, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
1661:00:11, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
1635:20:18, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
1287:. The codes were for example:
445:Template:WikiProject Chemistry
343:and leave any messages at the
1:
1696:) uses "PFAS" as a singular:
1643:Inconsistent - PFAS vs. PFASs
1621:12:32, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
1605:03:36, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
1589:21:51, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
1468:â Assignment last updated by
1429:08:49, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
1406:22:54, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
1380:21:26, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
1332:Thanks for the self-revert.
916:13:44, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
909:doi:10.1080/10408440802209804
899:22:39, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
881:23:07, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
850:09:23, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
832:04:04, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
797:21:15, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
525:and see a list of open tasks.
436:and see a list of open tasks.
42:Put new text under old text.
1802:C-Class Environment articles
1347:20:34, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
1328:20:25, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
1314:20:21, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
1274:20:00, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
1259:19:54, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
1235:19:47, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
1216:19:40, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
1165:00:35, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
1036:doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6223
1011:I noticed that you have now
1573:07:54, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
1143:21:41, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
1130:01:35, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
1116:21:29, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
1101:20:06, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
1086:19:59, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
1046:22:40, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
1000:21:29, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
991:19:56, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
977:19:54, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
968:19:41, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
950:19:37, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
808:22:17, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
650:Describe the occurrence of
50:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
1853:
1812:C-Class Chemistry articles
1531:18:49, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
1498:20:14, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
557:project's importance scale
514:WikiProject Science Policy
468:project's importance scale
379:project's importance scale
341:Knowledge:Contributing FAQ
1508:18:49, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
550:
499:
461:
410:
372:
283:
262:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
1732:For the reasons stated,
1550:13:38, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
1694:doi:10.1787/e458e796-en
1478:21:26, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
929:Special:Diff/1179060477
537:Science Policy articles
318:WikiProject Environment
315:article is part of the
1667:Leaning towards using
1514:Presence in Fertilizer
1363:Bloomberg Investigates
1077:doi:10.1002/ajim.23461
1068:doi:10.1002/ajim.23454
325:. The aim is to write
244:This article is rated
75:avoid personal attacks
1456:. Student editor(s):
837:These tags have been
425:WikiProject Chemistry
199:Auto-archiving period
100:Neutral point of view
1105:I wasn't aware that
905:Hypercholesterolemia
862:than other editors.
359:Environment articles
105:No original research
313:environment-related
1767:analytical methods
1454:on the course page
652:PFAS in pesticides
620:Updated 2023-05-10
448:Chemistry articles
306:Environment portal
250:content assessment
86:dispute resolution
47:
1344:
1336:
1311:
1303:
1256:
1248:
1213:
1205:
1055:This section was
799:
783:comment added by
769:
768:
734:
733:
698:
697:
666:
665:
660:
659:
571:
570:
567:
566:
563:
562:
478:
477:
474:
473:
389:
388:
385:
384:
345:project talk page
230:
229:
66:Assume good faith
43:
1844:
1676:
1480:
1462:article contribs
1451:
1447:
1443:
1417:biomagnification
1399:biomagnification
1345:
1342:
1340:
1334:
1312:
1309:
1307:
1301:
1257:
1254:
1252:
1246:
1214:
1211:
1209:
1203:
1134:Do you refer to
940:
869:
860:
764:
748:
725:
724:
711:
703:
686:. The result of
675:
674:
668:
634:
627:
626:
621:
584:
583:
573:
539:
538:
535:
532:
529:
508:
501:
500:
495:
487:
480:
450:
449:
446:
443:
440:
419:
412:
411:
406:
398:
391:
361:
360:
357:
354:
351:
308:
303:
302:
292:
285:
284:
279:
271:
264:
247:
241:
240:
232:
224:
210:
209:
200:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
1852:
1851:
1847:
1846:
1845:
1843:
1842:
1841:
1792:
1791:
1780:194.230.145.139
1769:
1749:
1705:
1701:
1674:
1645:
1557:
1538:
1516:
1486:
1467:
1446:16 January 2024
1437:
1413:bioaccumulation
1395:bioaccumulation
1387:
1365:
1338:
1333:
1305:
1300:
1250:
1245:
1207:
1202:
1181:
1053:
934:
932:
863:
854:
816:
774:
760:
749:
743:
716:
672:
662:
661:
656:
595:
581:
553:High-importance
536:
533:
530:
527:
526:
494:Highâimportance
493:
447:
444:
441:
438:
437:
404:
375:High-importance
358:
355:
352:
349:
348:
331:well-referenced
304:
297:
278:Highâimportance
277:
248:on Knowledge's
245:
226:
225:
220:
197:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
1850:
1848:
1840:
1839:
1834:
1829:
1824:
1819:
1814:
1809:
1804:
1794:
1793:
1768:
1765:
1748:
1745:
1744:
1743:
1731:
1723:
1708:
1703:
1699:
1690:
1644:
1641:
1640:
1639:
1638:
1637:
1592:
1591:
1556:
1553:
1537:
1534:
1515:
1512:
1511:
1510:
1490:195.176.112.14
1485:
1482:
1436:
1433:
1432:
1431:
1386:
1383:
1364:
1361:
1360:
1359:
1358:
1357:
1356:
1355:
1354:
1353:
1352:
1351:
1350:
1349:
1180:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1174:
1173:
1172:
1171:
1170:
1169:
1168:
1167:
1080:
1079:
1070:
1052:
1049:
1039:
1038:
1029:
1009:
1008:
1007:
1006:
1005:
1004:
1003:
1002:
931:
926:
925:
924:
923:
922:
921:
920:
919:
918:
815:
814:Vague tag-ism?
812:
811:
810:
773:
770:
767:
766:
754:
751:
750:
745:
741:
739:
736:
735:
732:
731:
718:
717:
712:
706:
700:
696:
695:
688:the discussion
676:
664:
663:
658:
657:
655:
654:
638:
636:
635:
623:
578:
576:
569:
568:
565:
564:
561:
560:
549:
543:
542:
540:
528:Science Policy
523:the discussion
519:Science policy
509:
497:
496:
491:Science Policy
488:
476:
475:
472:
471:
464:Mid-importance
460:
454:
453:
451:
434:the discussion
420:
408:
407:
405:Midâimportance
399:
387:
386:
383:
382:
371:
365:
364:
362:
338:
310:
309:
293:
281:
280:
272:
260:
259:
253:
242:
228:
227:
218:
216:
215:
212:
211:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1849:
1838:
1835:
1833:
1830:
1828:
1825:
1823:
1820:
1818:
1815:
1813:
1810:
1808:
1805:
1803:
1800:
1799:
1797:
1790:
1789:
1785:
1781:
1778:
1774:
1766:
1764:
1763:
1759:
1755:
1746:
1742:
1739:
1735:
1729:
1726:
1721:
1718:
1715:
1712:
1707:
1706:â) is a PFAS.
1695:
1691:
1689:
1685:
1681:
1677:
1671:
1670:
1665:
1664:
1663:
1662:
1658:
1654:
1650:
1642:
1636:
1632:
1628:
1624:
1623:
1622:
1618:
1614:
1609:
1608:
1607:
1606:
1602:
1598:
1590:
1586:
1582:
1577:
1576:
1575:
1574:
1570:
1566:
1561:
1554:
1552:
1551:
1547:
1543:
1542:57.135.233.22
1535:
1533:
1532:
1528:
1524:
1521:
1513:
1509:
1506:
1502:
1501:
1500:
1499:
1495:
1491:
1483:
1481:
1479:
1475:
1471:
1470:Lindseybean28
1465:
1463:
1459:
1455:
1442:
1434:
1430:
1426:
1422:
1418:
1414:
1410:
1409:
1408:
1407:
1404:
1400:
1396:
1392:
1391:this addition
1384:
1382:
1381:
1377:
1373:
1370:
1362:
1348:
1341:
1331:
1330:
1329:
1325:
1321:
1317:
1316:
1315:
1308:
1298:
1294:
1290:
1286:
1281:
1277:
1276:
1275:
1271:
1267:
1262:
1261:
1260:
1253:
1243:
1238:
1237:
1236:
1232:
1228:
1224:
1220:
1219:
1218:
1217:
1210:
1200:
1196:
1192:
1188:
1185:
1178:
1166:
1162:
1158:
1154:
1150:
1146:
1145:
1144:
1141:
1137:
1133:
1132:
1131:
1127:
1123:
1119:
1118:
1117:
1114:
1110:
1109:
1104:
1103:
1102:
1098:
1094:
1090:
1089:
1088:
1087:
1084:
1078:
1074:
1071:
1069:
1065:
1062:
1061:
1060:
1058:
1050:
1048:
1047:
1044:
1037:
1033:
1030:
1028:
1024:
1021:
1020:
1019:
1017:
1016:
1001:
998:
994:
993:
992:
988:
984:
980:
979:
978:
975:
971:
970:
969:
965:
961:
957:
956:PMID:23403779
954:
953:
952:
951:
948:
944:
938:
930:
927:
917:
914:
910:
906:
902:
901:
900:
896:
892:
888:
884:
883:
882:
878:
874:
867:
858:
853:
852:
851:
848:
844:
840:
836:
835:
834:
833:
829:
825:
821:
813:
809:
806:
802:
801:
800:
798:
794:
790:
786:
785:69.113.212.40
782:
772:Biased Source
771:
763:
758:
753:
752:
738:
737:
730:
727:
726:
723:
720:
719:
715:
710:
705:
704:
701:
693:
689:
685:
681:
677:
670:
669:
653:
649:
647:
646:
641:
640:
637:
633:
629:
628:
625:
622:
619:
616:
613:
610:
607:
604:
601:
598:
594:
592:
588:
577:
575:
574:
558:
554:
548:
545:
544:
541:
524:
520:
516:
515:
510:
507:
503:
502:
498:
492:
489:
486:
482:
469:
465:
459:
456:
455:
452:
435:
431:
427:
426:
421:
418:
414:
413:
409:
403:
400:
397:
393:
380:
376:
370:
367:
366:
363:
346:
342:
336:
332:
328:
324:
320:
319:
314:
307:
301:
296:
294:
291:
287:
286:
282:
276:
273:
270:
266:
261:
257:
251:
243:
239:
234:
233:
214:
213:
208:
204:
196:
192:
189:
187:
183:
182:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
1772:
1770:
1750:
1733:
1668:
1666:
1648:
1646:
1593:
1562:
1558:
1539:
1517:
1487:
1466:
1438:
1389:In my view,
1388:
1366:
1297:WP:SECONDARY
1242:WP:SECONDARY
1223:WP:SECONDARY
1182:
1106:
1081:
1072:
1063:
1054:
1040:
1031:
1022:
1014:
1010:
933:
904:
886:
819:
817:
779:â Preceding
775:
756:
713:
699:
692:no consensus
691:
643:
642:
624:
617:
611:
605:
599:
585:
579:
552:
512:
463:
423:
374:
316:
256:WikiProjects
202:
184:
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
1565:Txantimedia
1450:11 May 2024
1339:Gtoffoletto
1320:Bon courage
1306:Gtoffoletto
1266:Bon courage
1251:Gtoffoletto
1227:Bon courage
1225:in nature?
1208:Gtoffoletto
1191:Bon courage
1157:Bon courage
1138:sources? --
1122:Bon courage
1093:Bon courage
983:Bon courage
960:Bon courage
937:Bon courage
762:ClueBot III
350:Environment
335:categorized
323:environment
275:Environment
148:free images
31:not a forum
1796:Categories
1675:Tenryuu đ˛
1372:77.58.7.44
1280:WP:PRIMARY
1136:WP:Primary
587:To-do list
1285:industry.
866:Jmrowland
729:Archive 1
439:Chemistry
430:chemistry
402:Chemistry
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
1754:Gahundle
1653:Gahundle
1627:Gahundle
1536:Examples
1421:JimRenge
1199:WP:MEDRS
1149:WP:MEDRS
793:contribs
781:unsigned
757:400 days
714:Archives
203:400Â days
186:Archives
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
1597:Drsruli
1458:GregRR1
1057:removed
615:refresh
603:history
555:on the
466:on the
377:on the
327:neutral
246:C-class
154:WPÂ refs
142:scholar
1153:WP:BMI
891:rowley
873:Beland
843:Beland
824:rowley
645:Update
252:scale.
126:Google
1523:Hcobb
839:added
722:Index
680:moved
609:watch
339:Read
311:This
191:Index
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
1784:talk
1758:talk
1738:Leyo
1736:. --
1711:e.g.
1669:PFAS
1657:talk
1631:talk
1617:talk
1613:Nowa
1601:talk
1585:talk
1581:Nowa
1569:talk
1546:talk
1527:talk
1505:Leyo
1494:talk
1474:talk
1448:and
1425:talk
1415:and
1403:Leyo
1401:. --
1397:and
1376:talk
1335:{{u|
1324:talk
1302:{{u|
1270:talk
1247:{{u|
1231:talk
1204:{{u|
1161:talk
1151:for
1147:Non-
1140:Leyo
1126:talk
1113:Leyo
1097:talk
1083:Leyo
1043:Leyo
997:Leyo
987:talk
974:Leyo
964:talk
947:Leyo
913:Leyo
895:talk
877:talk
857:Leyo
847:Leyo
828:talk
805:Leyo
789:talk
690:was
684:PFAS
597:edit
589:for
547:High
369:High
329:and
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
1464:).
1244:.
1189:. @
841:by
682:to
458:Mid
176:TWL
1798::
1786:)
1775:,
1760:)
1717:or
1686:)
1684:đ
1682:â˘
1680:đŹ
1678:(
1659:)
1633:)
1619:)
1603:)
1587:)
1571:)
1548:)
1529:)
1496:)
1476:)
1427:)
1378:)
1343:}}
1326:)
1310:}}
1272:)
1255:}}
1233:)
1212:}}
1163:)
1155:.
1128:)
1099:)
1075:,
1066:,
1041:--
1034:,
1025:,
989:)
966:)
945:?
897:)
879:)
830:)
795:)
791:â˘
201::
193:,
156:)
54:;
1782:(
1756:(
1704:2
1700:3
1655:(
1629:(
1615:(
1599:(
1583:(
1567:(
1544:(
1525:(
1492:(
1472:(
1460:(
1423:(
1374:(
1322:(
1268:(
1229:(
1159:(
1124:(
1095:(
985:(
962:(
939::
935:@
893:(
875:(
868::
864:@
859::
855:@
826:(
787:(
694:.
648::
618:¡
612:¡
606:¡
600:¡
593::
559:.
470:.
381:.
347:.
337:.
258::
195:1
188::
172:¡
166:¡
158:¡
151:¡
145:¡
139:¡
133:¡
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
