Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:Placebo

Source đź“ť

1500:
credible. These conditions do not seem to apply here, as the currenty reference 1 stems from one national academic society and not from democratically legitimzed regulatory, refers to only one indication, namely pain, and most importantly, refers to a very unusual situation, namely "placebo in pain management". Please note that such use is likely to be illegal! Placebos cannot be prescribed or purchased. Legal use of placebos is confined to clinical trials. However, there is a solid and extremely widely accepted reference for this topic, namely the Internationl Conference for Harmonization (ICH) with its guideline E10 "Choice of COntrol Group in Clinical Trials", issued and adopted in 2000. The sentence essential for placebo in this guideline is: "In a placebo-controlled trial, subjects are randomly assigned to a test treatment or to an identical-appearing treatment that does not contain the test drug." There are other important considerations below this sentence. Hence, it appears justified to modify the sentence to a definition: : -->
1336:--- And sometimes a strong conceit or apprehension, as Valesius proves, will take away diseases: in both kinds it will produce real effects. Men, if they see but another man tremble, giddy or sick of some fearful disease, their apprehension and fear is so strong in this kind, that they will have the same disease. Or if by some soothsayer, wiseman, fortune-teller, or physician, they be told they shall have such a disease, they will so seriously apprehend it, that they will instantly labour of it. A thing familiar in China (saith Riccius the Jesuit), If it be told them they shall be sick on such a day, when that day comes they will surely be sick, and will be so terribly afflicted, that sometimes they die upon it. Dr. Cotta in his discovery of ignorant practitioners of physic, cap. 8, hath two strange stories to this purpose, what fancy is able to do... --- from: 171: 280: 647: 1300: 961: 945: 155: 1197: 334: 313: 423: 668: 1047: 402: 997: 766: 748: 617: 1704:
you started: It exists, maybe, but we cant really figure how much, but its most certainly insignificant, except when its not. I mean... is this supposed to be some red tape bureaucratic comedy? Whilst writing these articles, you might wish to provide a factual, on ground conclusion. An answer if you will instead of tossing in pro and contra data points left and right, creating an informational mire.
521: 242: 1147: 1134: 226: 1503:
drug as far as possible." As the US FDA themselves contributed to and adopted finally ICH E10, they do not see a relevant difference between these definitions. All in all, please consider 1. modifying the first sentence, 2. removing reference 1 as far as definitions are concerned, 3. inserting the definitions given by ICH E10 and 21 CFR 314, 4. providing respective references.
271: 535: 507: 847: 816: 545: 1404:, but need to find a review and if multiple studies reproduced the result. Also, the lede only mentions the informed consent issue, but it should probably also mention the fact that in clinical research patients are given a placebo when there are effective medications available (as described later in the article), this is also an ethical issue. -- 857: 433: 1348:
would be no dishonesty. It is possible that this statement is being taken out of context from the cited work. As it stands, the statement is misleading. Perhaps more context from the cited work can be given to illustrate the way in which giving a placebo might introduce dishonesty into a doctor-patient relationship.
1535:, thank you for the interesting references and comment. Please feel free to update the entry, as you seem knowledgeable about it and the references you provide are sound, and it is unlikely others will not do it (at least in the near future). If you do so, I will fix any formatting issue or wording, so don't worry. 1678:
to here and a small mention in the lead but I have no idea how well-received in the community those views are (if they are totally fringe, we probably should not). Non-expert me has found Google Scholar hits for "placebo effect" (163k) vs "contextual effect" (15k, most seem to be about medicine) that
1744:
I think the issue here is that while the idea of a Placebo Effect for quantitative health outcomes has been debunked, patients still *self-report* things like decreased pain, reduced depression, etc. I agree the article would benefit with being restructured to first cover the "history and debunking"
1703:
In its nature the article is completely self-defeating, because if its taken at face value, one is left with a PhD level demonstration of what gossip among scientists and medical professionals looks like with everyone throwing slanted/partial data in the pool, then at the end you are exactly where
1699:
Reading the article feels like a true rollercoaster, which is pretty troublesome when you want to get a sense of the validity of the concept. What i mean is that the article contains several quotes and sources about deeming placebo insignificant, dubious or outright dismissible, while at the exact
1502:
Placebo is expected to be an identical-appearing treatment that does not contain the test drug.<< You may also refer to the older US definition given in 21 CFR 314. §128, b 2 i: "Placebo concurrent control: The test drug is compared with an inactive preparation designed to resemble the test
1347:
I have attempted to edit this line, but was reverted: "The use of placebos as treatment in clinical medicine raises ethical concerns, as it introduces dishonesty into the doctor–patient relationship." However, for example, if the patient were *told* that they were being given a placebo, then there
1661:
I have seen objections to the term "placebo effect" for a couple of reasons. Some are technical, basically that it is a fuzzy term that can cover a mixture of several effects that should be considered separately: reporting bias in RCT + social ritual healing (common knowledge is that going to the
1377:
I concur with Alexbrn, "bypassing informed consent" was recently added in fact to precisely clarify why placebo may introduce dishonesty. But I think I see what you mean: I need to check but I think that there are studies showing that the placebo effect can still happen even when the patient is
1499:
The first sentence has a questionable reference. As it contains a definition, the definition should be absolutely solid, not in contradiction (and best: in no means different) from the definitions given in the respective section, and the definition should refer to a reference that is outmost
1478:
I have edited the lede to clarify that placebos do not need to be disguised in order to be considered placebos or to have placebo effects. It also includes a note about the ethical issues of using a placebo as a control in a clinical trial when there is already an existing treatment.
1723:
was debunked and implying that there's no such thing as the placebo effect, which seems unlikely given the extent of the measures that usually seem to be taken to allow for the placebo effect in clinical trials. Possibly it just means that the particular data used in
1682:
The political objections might be worth a discussion too somewhere but only if it is a sourceable view (not necessarily among practitioners, but also among skeptics, governmental bodies, etc.). For obvious reasons I found mostly opinion pieces to that effect.
1378:
informed, in which case there would be no bypassing of informed consent. I need to check for sources then, but this may make this statement about dishonesty a bit too strong, but then this can be easily fixed by changing "as it introduces dishonesty" -: -->
1805: 1666:
is a possible source discussing it. Some are political: the name "placebo effect" allows cranks to say "well, there is an effect" and convince the public in a way "as efficient as sugar" does not (see the start of
1795: 1419: 1577:
The prevailing view in medical ethics is that placebos have an important role in clinical trials. Otherwise, it is considered unethical to give fake medicine to a patient, especially if the patient is being
284: 1810: 148: 163: 629: 625: 1745:
of a "real placebo effect" (historical misunderstanding of regression to the mean) and then continue with a discussion of the "actual placebo effect" as it related to self-reported conditions.
1662:
doctor and following her instructions make people better, and that expectation makes it happen) + various noise in remission statistics (reversal to the mean, spontaneous remission etc.);
1915: 1311:
may help lead to tertiary medical sources...of particular interest was discussion of the different strength of response across medical conditions, and how certain conditions like pain,
1506:
When having done this, you might find that the section 1 (Definitions) might require re-editing. Then you might find also other sections of the placebo article that need improvement.
1759:
The placebo effect has not been debunked. It is real. I study placebos. The page needs strong changes. Placebo effect is real. That's a fact. I can give you tons of references....
563: 1920: 567: 878:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the
782: 1910: 1930: 968: 830: 384: 184: 1880: 915: 730: 489: 1820: 374: 773: 753: 92: 1835: 479: 1925: 1790: 607: 1890: 1870: 905: 720: 1825: 952: 826: 350: 1850: 597: 1319:
have strong responses that can be explained by changes in brain chemistry. It may help calibrate what conditions should be mentioned in this article.
1875: 1840: 880: 696: 455: 98: 1900: 1860: 1800: 1700:
same time it provides factual data that its a very much existing, functioning and measurable concept, especially with pain, nausea, depression.
1815: 197: 572: 341: 318: 1885: 1865: 1830: 43: 1905: 1705: 870: 821: 675: 652: 446: 407: 1845: 1126: 112: 558: 512: 117: 33: 1402: 1160: 1895: 1424: 87: 1785: 57: 293: 1563:
Hajokrem writes that from the sources it's stated placebos are regulated and only allowed for clinical trials, is that true?
1521: 1363:
The reason is clear - bypassing informed consent. The scenario you set out does not appear in the sources we cite, does it?
78: 781:
related articles on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
695:
related articles on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1586: 1398: 1285: 1465: 1353: 1084: 122: 1855: 1264: 1440:
What happens in research is another matter, the text in question applies to what happens in clinical medicine.
1400: 1316: 139: 1461: 1349: 299: 1728:
were duds, rather than that the placebo effect doesn't exist? If so, it might make sense for it to say so.
1709: 1509: 1001: 1252: 1247: 1240: 1235: 1230: 1223: 1218: 1213: 1764: 204: 68: 1594: 1554: 1517: 1484: 454:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
349:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1675: 1654: 83: 1312: 1582: 778: 225: 1760: 1070: 1059: 270: 252: 1733: 1532: 1513: 520: 1270: 211: 1750: 1568: 1540: 1445: 1431: 1409: 1388: 1368: 1299: 862: 438: 64: 1146: 1628: 1603: 1590: 1550: 1480: 1337: 1266: 1196: 1079:
If there ever were any, none now. Some first author names repeat, but to different articles.
667: 646: 550: 1679:
indicate the term is in use, but that is hardly convincing ("faith healing" scores 24k).
1663: 1309: 1729: 1668: 1585:
is basically an entire industry that is built on giving out placebos. Besides alt-med,
1460:
introduce dishonesty" is exactly the change I attempted to make. I'm glad you concur.
1046: 190: 960: 944: 1779: 1639: 1614: 688: 684: 333: 312: 1746: 1684: 1564: 1536: 1441: 1427: 1405: 1384: 1364: 346: 1077:
References instead of multiple citations to same reference (use <ref=name"...")
248: 1305:
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
1589:
shows it is common for doctors to prescribe an unrelated medicine as a placebo.
765: 747: 616: 422: 401: 1421: 1133: 1169: 875: 852: 692: 540: 451: 428: 1719:
Yeah, this article does seem weird. It seems to be stating repeatedly that
178: 1633: 1608: 1549:
These definitions only deal with the use of placebos in clinical trials.
1164: 138: 1155: 1100:
sort "further reading" references alphabetically (and perhaps by type)?
1005: 874:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to 680: 37: 1581:
But even if it is considered unethical, it still happens in practice.
247:
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on
1806:
Knowledge (XXG) level-4 vital articles in Biology and health sciences
846: 815: 1674:
I would think my first source is enough to justify a redirect from
1333:
I found this in The Anatomy of Melancholy by Robert Burton (1621):
1268: 534: 506: 1383:
introduce dishonesty". Let me check for sources and we'll see. --
570:. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at 154: 1768: 1754: 1737: 1713: 1689: 1644: 1619: 1598: 1572: 1558: 1544: 1525: 1488: 1469: 1449: 1435: 1413: 1392: 1372: 1357: 1294: 1271: 1190: 1141: 1116: 987: 264: 236: 220: 28: 15: 1796:
Knowledge (XXG) vital articles in Biology and health sciences
1671:
though I doubt that is a reliable source by WP's standards).
1102:
Section no longer exists. "See also" has only three listings.
562:, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the 959: 943: 615: 1177:
All prior and subsequent edits to the article are noted in
1338:
http://www.gutenberg.org/files/10800/10800-h/ampart1.html
162: 1423:
and 1 in french (but not focused on open-label placebos)
1178: 1029: 1023: 1017: 1011: 1811:
B-Class vital articles in Biology and health sciences
1129:. Click the image to the right for full size version. 777:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 679:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 450:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 345:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 1606:, to be fair, alt med is also largely unethical... 926: 210: 791:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Alternative medicine 46:for general discussion of the article's subject. 1916:Low-importance Contemporary philosophy articles 566:and that biomedical information in any article 1279:This page has archives. Sections older than 564:Manual of Style for medicine-related articles 170: 8: 1397:Found that it's called "open-label placebos" 884:about philosophy content on Knowledge (XXG). 1921:Contemporary philosophy task force articles 1507: 1495:First sentence and Section 1 "Definitions" 1054:Here are some tasks awaiting attention: 923: 810: 742: 641: 501: 396: 307: 794:Template:WikiProject Alternative medicine 573:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Medicine 1911:B-Class Contemporary philosophy articles 1418:Found 3 reviews on open-label placebos: 359:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Pharmacology 1931:Articles linked from high traffic sites 1631:, correct, any other use is unethical. 812: 744: 643: 503: 398: 309: 268: 1926:Knowledge (XXG) pages with to-do lists 1791:Knowledge (XXG) level-4 vital articles 890:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Philosophy 705:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Skepticism 464:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Psychology 1881:B-Class Alternative medicine articles 196: 7: 1821:Top-importance pharmacology articles 1065:Introduction, several other sections 868:This article is within the scope of 771:This article is within the scope of 673:This article is within the scope of 582:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Medicine 556:This article is within the scope of 444:This article is within the scope of 339:This article is within the scope of 1836:High-importance psychology articles 1329:Another possible historical account 630:Medicine Collaboration of the Month 298:It is of interest to the following 36:for discussing improvements to the 1891:Low-importance Philosophy articles 1871:Mid-importance Skepticism articles 14: 1826:WikiProject Pharmacology articles 1283:may be automatically archived by 362:Template:WikiProject Pharmacology 63:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome! 1851:Mid-importance medicine articles 1298: 1195: 1145: 1132: 1045: 995: 855: 845: 814: 774:WikiProject Alternative medicine 764: 746: 666: 645: 568:use high-quality medical sources 543: 533: 519: 505: 431: 421: 400: 332: 311: 278: 269: 240: 224: 58:Click here to start a new topic. 1876:WikiProject Skepticism articles 1841:WikiProject Psychology articles 910:This article has been rated as 893:Template:WikiProject Philosophy 725:This article has been rated as 708:Template:WikiProject Skepticism 602:This article has been rated as 484:This article has been rated as 467:Template:WikiProject Psychology 379:This article has been rated as 1901:Low-importance ethics articles 1861:All WikiProject Medicine pages 1801:B-Class level-4 vital articles 1769:19:34, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 1090:Check if everything is correct 1: 1816:B-Class pharmacology articles 1738:04:16, 16 December 2022 (UTC) 1690:14:26, 11 February 2020 (UTC) 1645:12:02, 12 December 2019 (UTC) 1620:12:03, 12 December 2019 (UTC) 1599:10:54, 12 December 2019 (UTC) 1573:13:08, 11 December 2019 (UTC) 1559:11:30, 11 December 2019 (UTC) 1545:14:18, 10 December 2019 (UTC) 1526:10:18, 10 December 2019 (UTC) 1489:12:07, 27 November 2019 (UTC) 1470:19:11, 17 December 2019 (UTC) 1450:08:07, 27 November 2019 (UTC) 1436:00:27, 27 November 2019 (UTC) 1414:00:09, 27 November 2019 (UTC) 1393:21:14, 26 November 2019 (UTC) 1373:15:34, 26 November 2019 (UTC) 1358:15:24, 26 November 2019 (UTC) 797:Alternative medicine articles 785:and see a list of open tasks. 699:and see a list of open tasks. 585:Template:WikiProject Medicine 458:and see a list of open tasks. 353:and see a list of open tasks. 55:Put new text under old text. 1714:00:21, 1 November 2021 (UTC) 1886:B-Class Philosophy articles 1866:B-Class Skepticism articles 1831:B-Class psychology articles 1755:13:46, 23 August 2023 (UTC) 1167:, a high-traffic website. ( 1947: 1906:Ethics task force articles 916:project's importance scale 731:project's importance scale 608:project's importance scale 490:project's importance scale 385:project's importance scale 1846:B-Class medicine articles 1653:Creating a redirect from 967: 951: 922: 909: 840: 759: 724: 661: 623: 601: 528: 483: 416: 378: 327: 306: 93:Be welcoming to newcomers 22:Skip to table of contents 1317:Irritable bowel syndrome 342:WikiProject Pharmacology 21: 1896:B-Class ethics articles 969:Contemporary philosophy 927:Associated task forces: 1786:B-Class vital articles 1286:Lowercase sigmabot III 964: 948: 871:WikiProject Philosophy 676:WikiProject Skepticism 620: 447:WikiProject Psychology 88:avoid personal attacks 963: 947: 619: 365:pharmacology articles 292:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 285:level-4 vital article 136:Find medical sources: 113:Neutral point of view 1726:The Powerful Placebo 1721:The Powerful Placebo 1179:its revision history 788:Alternative medicine 779:Alternative medicine 754:Alternative medicine 559:WikiProject Medicine 118:No original research 1462:Gitpushoriginmaster 1350:Gitpushoriginmaster 1343:Needs clarification 1313:Parkinson's disease 896:Philosophy articles 711:Skepticism articles 470:psychology articles 1695:Self contradiction 1125:was featured in a 1035:Updated 2018-08-21 965: 949: 881:general discussion 624:This article is a 621: 294:content assessment 142: 99:dispute resolution 60: 1676:contextual effect 1655:contextual effect 1643: 1618: 1528: 1512:comment added by 1456:@Signimu, "as it 1326: 1325: 1293: 1292: 1258: 1257: 1187: 1186: 1182: 1140: 1139: 1127:WikiWorld cartoon 1115: 1114: 1109: 1108: 986: 985: 982: 981: 978: 977: 974: 973: 863:Philosophy portal 809: 808: 805: 804: 741: 740: 737: 736: 640: 639: 636: 635: 588:medicine articles 500: 499: 496: 495: 439:Psychology portal 395: 394: 391: 390: 263: 262: 259: 258: 219: 218: 141:Source guidelines 140: 79:Assume good faith 56: 27: 26: 1938: 1856:MCOTM candidates 1687: 1637: 1612: 1302: 1295: 1288: 1272: 1210: 1209: 1199: 1191: 1176: 1172: 1153:On 31 May 2010, 1149: 1142: 1136: 1117: 1049: 1042: 1041: 1036: 999: 998: 988: 934: 924: 898: 897: 894: 891: 888: 865: 860: 859: 858: 849: 842: 841: 836: 833: 818: 811: 799: 798: 795: 792: 789: 768: 761: 760: 750: 743: 713: 712: 709: 706: 703: 670: 663: 662: 657: 649: 642: 590: 589: 586: 583: 580: 553: 548: 547: 546: 537: 530: 529: 524: 523: 522: 517: 509: 502: 472: 471: 468: 465: 462: 441: 436: 435: 434: 425: 418: 417: 412: 404: 397: 367: 366: 363: 360: 357: 336: 329: 328: 323: 315: 308: 291: 282: 281: 274: 273: 265: 244: 243: 237: 233:Daily page views 228: 221: 215: 214: 200: 174: 166: 158: 144: 108:Article policies 29: 16: 1946: 1945: 1941: 1940: 1939: 1937: 1936: 1935: 1776: 1775: 1697: 1685: 1659: 1497: 1345: 1331: 1284: 1273: 1267: 1204: 1168: 1111: 1110: 1105: 1010: 996: 932: 895: 892: 889: 886: 885: 861: 856: 854: 834: 824: 796: 793: 790: 787: 786: 710: 707: 704: 701: 700: 655: 587: 584: 581: 578: 577: 551:Medicine portal 549: 544: 542: 518: 515: 486:High-importance 469: 466: 463: 460: 459: 437: 432: 430: 411:High‑importance 410: 364: 361: 358: 355: 354: 321: 289: 279: 241: 235: 134: 129: 128: 127: 104: 74: 12: 11: 5: 1944: 1942: 1934: 1933: 1928: 1923: 1918: 1913: 1908: 1903: 1898: 1893: 1888: 1883: 1878: 1873: 1868: 1863: 1858: 1853: 1848: 1843: 1838: 1833: 1828: 1823: 1818: 1813: 1808: 1803: 1798: 1793: 1788: 1778: 1777: 1774: 1773: 1772: 1771: 1741: 1740: 1696: 1693: 1658: 1651: 1650: 1649: 1648: 1647: 1626: 1625: 1624: 1623: 1622: 1587:this UK survey 1579: 1547: 1496: 1493: 1492: 1491: 1476: 1475: 1474: 1473: 1472: 1454: 1453: 1452: 1416: 1344: 1341: 1330: 1327: 1324: 1323: 1322: 1321: 1320: 1306: 1303: 1291: 1290: 1278: 1275: 1274: 1269: 1265: 1263: 1260: 1259: 1256: 1255: 1250: 1244: 1243: 1238: 1233: 1227: 1226: 1221: 1216: 1206: 1205: 1200: 1194: 1185: 1184: 1150: 1138: 1137: 1130: 1120: 1113: 1112: 1107: 1106: 1104: 1103: 1091: 1080: 1066: 1053: 1051: 1050: 1038: 993: 991: 984: 983: 980: 979: 976: 975: 972: 971: 966: 956: 955: 950: 940: 939: 937: 935: 929: 928: 920: 919: 912:Low-importance 908: 902: 901: 899: 867: 866: 850: 838: 837: 835:Low‑importance 819: 807: 806: 803: 802: 800: 783:the discussion 769: 757: 756: 751: 739: 738: 735: 734: 727:Mid-importance 723: 717: 716: 714: 697:the discussion 671: 659: 658: 656:Mid‑importance 650: 638: 637: 634: 633: 622: 612: 611: 604:Mid-importance 600: 594: 593: 591: 555: 554: 538: 526: 525: 516:Mid‑importance 510: 498: 497: 494: 493: 482: 476: 475: 473: 456:the discussion 443: 442: 426: 414: 413: 405: 393: 392: 389: 388: 381:Top-importance 377: 371: 370: 368: 351:the discussion 337: 325: 324: 322:Top‑importance 316: 304: 303: 297: 275: 261: 260: 257: 256: 245: 231: 229: 217: 216: 131: 130: 126: 125: 120: 115: 106: 105: 103: 102: 95: 90: 81: 75: 73: 72: 61: 52: 51: 48: 47: 41: 25: 24: 19: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1943: 1932: 1929: 1927: 1924: 1922: 1919: 1917: 1914: 1912: 1909: 1907: 1904: 1902: 1899: 1897: 1894: 1892: 1889: 1887: 1884: 1882: 1879: 1877: 1874: 1872: 1869: 1867: 1864: 1862: 1859: 1857: 1854: 1852: 1849: 1847: 1844: 1842: 1839: 1837: 1834: 1832: 1829: 1827: 1824: 1822: 1819: 1817: 1814: 1812: 1809: 1807: 1804: 1802: 1799: 1797: 1794: 1792: 1789: 1787: 1784: 1783: 1781: 1770: 1766: 1762: 1758: 1757: 1756: 1752: 1748: 1743: 1742: 1739: 1735: 1731: 1727: 1722: 1718: 1717: 1716: 1715: 1711: 1707: 1706:37.191.17.124 1701: 1694: 1692: 1691: 1688: 1680: 1677: 1672: 1670: 1665: 1656: 1652: 1646: 1641: 1636: 1635: 1630: 1627: 1621: 1616: 1611: 1610: 1605: 1602: 1601: 1600: 1596: 1592: 1588: 1584: 1580: 1576: 1575: 1574: 1570: 1566: 1562: 1561: 1560: 1556: 1552: 1548: 1546: 1542: 1538: 1534: 1531: 1530: 1529: 1527: 1523: 1519: 1515: 1511: 1504: 1494: 1490: 1486: 1482: 1477: 1471: 1467: 1463: 1459: 1455: 1451: 1447: 1443: 1439: 1438: 1437: 1433: 1429: 1425: 1422: 1420: 1417: 1415: 1411: 1407: 1403: 1401: 1399: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1390: 1386: 1382: 1376: 1375: 1374: 1370: 1366: 1362: 1361: 1360: 1359: 1355: 1351: 1342: 1340: 1339: 1334: 1328: 1318: 1314: 1310: 1308: 1307: 1304: 1301: 1297: 1296: 1287: 1282: 1277: 1276: 1262: 1261: 1254: 1251: 1249: 1246: 1245: 1242: 1239: 1237: 1234: 1232: 1229: 1228: 1225: 1222: 1220: 1217: 1215: 1212: 1211: 1208: 1207: 1203: 1198: 1193: 1192: 1189: 1183: 1180: 1174: 1171: 1166: 1162: 1158: 1157: 1151: 1148: 1144: 1143: 1135: 1131: 1128: 1124: 1121: 1119: 1118: 1101: 1098: 1096: 1092: 1089: 1087: 1086: 1081: 1078: 1075: 1073: 1072: 1067: 1064: 1062: 1061: 1056: 1055: 1052: 1048: 1044: 1043: 1040: 1037: 1034: 1031: 1028: 1025: 1022: 1019: 1016: 1013: 1009: 1007: 1003: 992: 990: 989: 970: 962: 958: 957: 954: 946: 942: 941: 938: 936: 931: 930: 925: 921: 917: 913: 907: 904: 903: 900: 883: 882: 877: 873: 872: 864: 853: 851: 848: 844: 843: 839: 832: 828: 823: 820: 817: 813: 801: 784: 780: 776: 775: 770: 767: 763: 762: 758: 755: 752: 749: 745: 732: 728: 722: 719: 718: 715: 698: 694: 690: 689:pseudohistory 686: 685:pseudoscience 682: 678: 677: 672: 669: 665: 664: 660: 654: 651: 648: 644: 631: 627: 618: 614: 613: 609: 605: 599: 596: 595: 592: 575: 574: 569: 565: 561: 560: 552: 541: 539: 536: 532: 531: 527: 514: 511: 508: 504: 491: 487: 481: 478: 477: 474: 457: 453: 449: 448: 440: 429: 427: 424: 420: 419: 415: 409: 406: 403: 399: 386: 382: 376: 373: 372: 369: 352: 348: 344: 343: 338: 335: 331: 330: 326: 320: 317: 314: 310: 305: 301: 295: 287: 286: 276: 272: 267: 266: 254: 253:MediaWiki.org 250: 246: 239: 238: 234: 230: 227: 223: 222: 213: 209: 206: 203: 199: 195: 192: 189: 186: 185:ScienceDirect 183: 180: 177: 173: 169: 165: 161: 157: 153: 150: 147: 143: 137: 133: 132: 124: 123:Verifiability 121: 119: 116: 114: 111: 110: 109: 100: 96: 94: 91: 89: 85: 82: 80: 77: 76: 70: 66: 65:Learn to edit 62: 59: 54: 53: 50: 49: 45: 39: 35: 31: 30: 23: 20: 18: 17: 1725: 1720: 1702: 1698: 1681: 1673: 1660: 1632: 1607: 1508:— Preceding 1505: 1498: 1457: 1380: 1346: 1335: 1332: 1280: 1201: 1188: 1175: 1154: 1152: 1122: 1099: 1094: 1093: 1083: 1082: 1076: 1069: 1068: 1058: 1057: 1039: 1032: 1026: 1020: 1014: 1000: 994: 911: 879: 869: 831:Contemporary 772: 726: 674: 603: 571: 557: 485: 445: 380: 356:Pharmacology 347:Pharmacology 340: 319:Pharmacology 300:WikiProjects 283: 232: 207: 201: 193: 187: 181: 175: 167: 159: 151: 145: 135: 107: 32:This is the 1629:Anywikiuser 1604:Anywikiuser 1591:Anywikiuser 1551:Anywikiuser 1481:Anywikiuser 249:Phabricator 44:not a forum 1780:Categories 1002:To-do list 887:Philosophy 876:philosophy 822:Philosophy 702:Skepticism 693:skepticism 653:Skepticism 628:to be the 461:Psychology 452:Psychology 408:Psychology 1761:Placebo18 1730:Wombat140 1578:deceived. 1253:Archive 8 1248:Archive 7 1241:Archive 6 1236:Archive 5 1231:Archive 4 1224:Archive 3 1219:Archive 2 1214:Archive 1 626:candidate 288:is rated 101:if needed 84:Be polite 34:talk page 1533:Hajokrem 1522:contribs 1514:Hajokrem 1510:unsigned 1202:Archives 1165:Slashdot 579:Medicine 513:Medicine 191:Springer 156:Cochrane 69:get help 42:This is 40:article. 1747:Meekohi 1686:Tigraan 1583:Alt-med 1565:Signimu 1537:Signimu 1442:Alexbrn 1428:Signimu 1406:Signimu 1385:Signimu 1379:"as it 1365:Alexbrn 1281:60 days 1170:Traffic 1156:Placebo 1123:Placebo 1060:Cleanup 1030:refresh 1018:history 1006:Placebo 914:on the 729:on the 681:science 606:on the 488:on the 383:on the 290:B-class 251:and on 38:Placebo 1315:, and 1161:linked 1085:Verify 953:Ethics 827:Ethics 296:scale. 179:OpenMD 149:PubMed 1640:help! 1615:help! 1501:: --> 1163:from 1095:Other 1071:Merge 1024:watch 277:This 205:Wiley 97:Seek 1765:talk 1751:talk 1734:talk 1710:talk 1669:that 1664:here 1595:talk 1569:talk 1555:talk 1541:talk 1518:talk 1485:talk 1466:talk 1446:talk 1432:talk 1426:. -- 1410:talk 1389:talk 1369:talk 1354:talk 1159:was 1012:edit 1004:for 691:and 480:High 198:Trip 172:Gale 164:DOAJ 86:and 1634:Guy 1609:Guy 1458:may 1381:may 906:Low 721:Mid 598:Mid 375:Top 212:TWL 1782:: 1767:) 1753:) 1736:) 1712:) 1597:) 1571:) 1557:) 1543:) 1524:) 1520:• 1487:) 1468:) 1448:) 1434:) 1412:) 1391:) 1371:) 1356:) 933:/ 829:/ 825:: 687:, 683:, 67:; 1763:( 1749:( 1732:( 1708:( 1657:? 1642:) 1638:( 1617:) 1613:( 1593:( 1567:( 1553:( 1539:( 1516:( 1483:( 1464:( 1444:( 1430:( 1408:( 1387:( 1367:( 1352:( 1289:. 1181:. 1173:) 1097:: 1088:: 1074:: 1063:: 1033:· 1027:· 1021:· 1015:· 1008:: 918:. 733:. 632:. 610:. 576:. 492:. 387:. 302:: 255:. 208:· 202:· 194:· 188:· 182:· 176:· 168:· 160:· 152:· 146:· 71:.

Index

Skip to table of contents
talk page
Placebo
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Source guidelines
PubMed
Cochrane
DOAJ
Gale
OpenMD
ScienceDirect
Springer
Trip
Wiley
TWL

Phabricator
MediaWiki.org

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑