388:
378:
351:
1745:: the other reason that this conversation got started. I said what I wanted to do in my first post just as WP:CITEVAR says I should. The second part of your most recent post is revealing. I wrote in my second post: "may I assume that you will not rise to object if I were to come back to this article at some point and make those changes?" Had you simply replied: "No. I own this article, please don't change it." That would have been the end.
21:
213:
454:
466:
54:
1130:
1077:
1062:
1043:
1035:
1020:
1009:
1001:
982:
971:
132:
1113:
1101:
265:
244:
275:
880:
I notice there are no images (not surprising given the subject matter, but I feel it could be a little more visually appealing. Maybe a map of madagascar with the locations of where remains have been recovered? Or a crude anatomical diagram with the bones which have been recovered (this would be hard
1163:
wrote: "That's in fact a more complicated system; and MOS says not to change reference style needlessly." I never make what I consider to be "needless" edits. When I came upon this article, the links from the notes to the cited references were not the usual super scripted and that one expects to
1175:
I disagree with Ucucha's assertion that use of Ref / Note templates is more complicated than the #tag:ref magic word method of putting notes in a separate section. Note text should be segregated from the article text so that editors don't become confused by what they're reading. When note text is
1679:
I continue to believe that we are not communicating. For the greatest part of this conversation, I thought we were talking about references to citations - not about footnotes (where, for the purposes of this conversation, a footnote is defined as explanatory text, not references to citations). I
925:
Visionholder has kindly offered to make a map; I'll send him the locality list from MacPhee '94. By the way, there was a reconstruction in an earlier version of this article, but I threw it out because it was reconstructed as an aardvark-like mammal and sources like Walker (1999) explicitly say we
1641:
I've written dozens of featured articles using a consistent citation style, and every now and then someone comes along that wants the citation style in some one of them changed to fit their taste. That taste tends to be different every time. More recently, I switched to a style using Sfn and Cite
1731:
are "antiquated", should they not be deprecated and their document pages marked with a big red watermark or some such indicator so that editors like me will stop using them? After all, how else are we to know that the markup that we are using should not be used?
1219:
A disadvantage of the templates you used is that it is necessary to keep track of the note numbers in two different places. Use of {{#tag:ref}} makes the software keep track of that, and the system is inherently less fragile because it is inbuilt in the software.
1171:
After reversion, the original markup is apparently working correctly. Unexplained, unexpected, and apparently intermittent results are disturbing, suggesting the use of an alternate method to avoid inconsistent behavior on the part of
Knowledge's code.
523:. There are some pics in there, but it's copyrighted. The only thing you can do is asking them to release it under GFDL or another license. I don't think Wikipedians in Madagascar will be of much help here - this animal has been extinct for a while now.
1555:. When I pointed out that this article doesn't conform to WP:LDR you hand-waved that away and claimed that WP:LDR isn't the standard but rather an option. Argh! Where is the standard? Why did you not refer to the standard to support your claim?
1707:
should be used for footnotes. In your last post, you seem, sort of, to agree. Yet, contrary to what you just wrote, you used the {{#tag:ref}} which does not "separate article text from reference contents". Do you see why I'm confused?
1386:
I wasn't quite as clear as I should have been perhaps. {{Citation}} is the top level of a set of templates from which {{Cite book}}, {{Cite journal}}, etc all descend. I used {{Citation}} as a broad-brush to encompass those other
1195:
733:
Actually, he found little support in the data from
Patterson's and Thewissen's papers—he writes that Patterson in particular was (to put it bluntly) interpreting the data tendentiously in support of tubulidentate affinities.
1277:
Our Manual of Style says not to change a consistent and functional citation style. This article has such a style. Besides, the problem with standardization is that there is a host of competing standards. More articles use
539:
I know it is extinct but I believe that the first place to ask for a free copyright image of a bone or anything useful could be
Madagascar... perhaps someone who is in the research, or perhaps in a museum of Madagascar...
1421:
is one technical option, not the standard. Its use is optional. In this case, most citations are so short (and those that are not are mostly not in running text) that the gain from list-defined references would be
1786:
1781:
115:
35:
1247:
Since you did not comment on the changes that I'd like to see in this article, may I assume that you will not rise to object if I were to come back to this article at some point and make those changes?
1776:
1369:
is the defining standard by which list-defined references are to be formatted, then this article does not comply. WP:LDR shows the list inside the {{Reflist}} template but here that isn't the case.
1164:
see. Rather, the links to the cited references were superscripted strings of 30 or 40 characters. Sort of like this: . The markup text in the article was/is correct according to
1238:
True, the editor must keep track of note numbers. But, it isn't that difficult and only needs to be done rarely. I'd like to see some development that combines the best of both.
60:
1216:
The random text you saw was probably a result of a bug introduced by a recent change in MediaWiki. It has been fixed, but remnants may have survived in the MediaWiki cache.
1680:
haven't talked about footnotes since my second post where I agreed that the editor needs to keep track of note numbers. Yet here we are; back to talking about footnotes.
1618:
There is no standard; LDR is but one option. I brought it up because it allows you to separate article text from reference contents, while avoiding use of the antiquated
783:
because they don't look like phalanges from nesomyines, euplerids, or tenrecs. I have gotten rid of the phrase, because it seems to be more problematic than enlightening.
779:
is from a large lemur according to MacPhee; and for the distal phalanges MacPhee says explicitly that their identification was problematic, but he identifies them as
667:
Now "eutherian mammalian genus". Sounds a little awkward, but I think it's good to put both the precise "eutherian" and the more common-knowledge "mammalian" in.
550:
I've got an idea. Perhaps if someone (I am implied) was to see the pictures from the AMNH, they could make some artistic impressions based on what they saw! --
843:
Oh, and a question for you: you changed "multiple species" to "more species". I like "multiple" better there, because it more clearly means "more than one".
1821:
484:
1176:
off in its own section, it is obvious that it is a note, parenthetical to the article - especially when note text is a number of sentences in length.
1826:
333:
1811:
1796:
444:
434:
323:
1198:. These mechanisms also enforce standardization giving a uniform look and feel to the document both from readers' and editors' points of view.
1816:
1801:
706:
oops, forgot there was only one species of aardvark. Still, I think that sentence and the next needs rewording. I will have a think about it.
1190:
The reader gets a link from the article text to the reference and from the reference to the full citation. See how this looks and works in
1831:
1771:
1483:
templates. Not true as an inspection of the two example articles will show. That is my fault. So, I rewrite the afflicted sentence here:
153:
299:
1806:
1791:
410:
1095:
479:
361:
1144:
950:
915:
892:
863:
824:
681:
634:
614:
1183:
encapsulated in {{Citation}} templates. References in the article, which currently look like this: <ref name=McP11: -->
288:
249:
772:- could be stated more simply, begs the question why "problematic" - just becuase they are very generic looking bones?
401:
356:
224:
1753:
1585:
1409:
1261:
1206:
30:
1687:
says: "In order to make the article text easier to read in the edit window, ..." This is precisely why I think that
298:-related subjects on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
939:
it was going to be tricky if possible at all, so disregard. Map or lack thereof not a deal-breaker really so......
976:
593:
96:
212:
20:
1749:
1581:
1405:
1274:). But I think it's better to keep note text with the place where the note is used; it makes editing easier.
1257:
1202:
541:
507:
1429:; Citation and the Cite xxx templates all use this meta-template, but output slightly different citations.
1426:
1319:
589:
53:
1282:
230:
146:
40:
727:
Ross MacPhee found little support for the tubulidentate affinities of
Plesiorycteropus (in their data)
1318:. Both of the examples you cite have several problems in their Harvard citations, as revealed by the
131:
409:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1518:
1463:
I don't think that we are communicating. I get the impression that you think that I want to use
1138:
944:
909:
886:
857:
818:
675:
628:
608:
551:
377:
350:
881:
I realise...) Any other ideas welcomed. I can help make a map if I have an image to work from.
1742:
1649:
1467:
1292:
1165:
471:
44:
904:
Anyway, nearly there pending query above on images. I trust all sources have been scoured...
1657:
1511:
1434:
1327:
1225:
1180:
1085:
927:
844:
805:
735:
729:- bracketed bit redundant as it is clear McPhee is looking into the data of the 1994 study.
572:
The article doesn't mention why except that it doesn't seem to have known close relatives.—
527:
165:
1312:
1648:
people find the need to change citation styles to fit their tastes. The style guideline
521:
1051:
670:
Agree, again precision trumps simplicity I think here as meaning is blurred otherwise.
280:
1765:
1725:
1701:
1684:
1632:
1552:
1477:
1418:
1366:
1271:
1134:
1107:
1014:
940:
905:
882:
853:
814:
671:
624:
604:
393:
187:
1715:
1691:
1622:
1302:
716:
Lead needs to have some basic size figures in it as well as when it became extinct.
453:
1653:
1430:
1323:
1221:
1160:
990:
524:
1191:
573:
461:
383:
270:
1652:
is clear that we should not go around changing established citation styles.
140:
596:. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
506:
Photo required of the skeleton or an artistic impression of this animal. --
1757:
1661:
1589:
1438:
1413:
1331:
1265:
1229:
1210:
1168:, yet it produced the unexpected result I've described. So I changed it.
1148:
954:
930:
919:
896:
867:
847:
828:
808:
738:
704:- "with the aardvarks" or "as an aardvark" - sounds funny as a group noun.
685:
638:
618:
576:
554:
544:
532:
510:
162:
Did you know ... that possible relatives of the extinct
Madagascar mammal
175:
171:
1159:
In the edit summary explaining why he reverted an edit that I had made,
1736:
1551:
You said that this article uses list-defined references and linked to
1133:- prose probably could do with some more massaging but enough for GA.
1196:
Military
Assistance Command, Vietnam – Studies and Observations Group
406:
294:
183:
274:
264:
243:
179:
520:
and take a pic. The only recent publication about this animal is
517:
206:
1185:, should be changed to Harvard style: <ref name=McP11: -->
452:
1787:
Knowledge Did you know articles that are featured articles
1782:
Featured articles that have appeared on the main page once
1074:
No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):
1106:
Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with
655:-if it is a pair of species may be better described as a
567:
is one of the most bizarre and mysterious mammals known.
1683:
I'm confused. The first clause of the first sentence @
1644:
108:
89:
1094:
Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have
1777:
Featured articles that have appeared on the main page
405:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
292:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
752:
Also "affinities" used in three sentences in a row.
769:the identification of which is partly problematic,
59:This article appeared on Knowledge's Main Page as
139:A fact from this article appeared on Knowledge's
1348:Nice tool. Those two pages are fixed. Thanks.
1006:Citations to reliable sources, where required:
804:But wrong; "Before Present" means before 1950.
182:, and its remains have been misidentified as
8:
43:. Even so, if you can update or improve it,
39:as one of the best articles produced by the
33:; it (or a previous version of it) has been
1270:There is: we have list-defined references (
813:Wow, I did not know that. okay nevermind.
345:
238:
68:
15:
1186:{{harvnb|MacPhee|1994|p=11}}</ref: -->
210:
1510:I should also like to see the works in
1179:I should also like to see the works in
347:
240:
653:is a recently extinct eutherian mammal
7:
1090:(none currently but some will help)
399:This article is within the scope of
286:This article is within the scope of
1425:The top-level template is actually
702:it was classified with the aardvark
229:It is of interest to the following
1822:Low-importance Madagascar articles
1112:
1100:
1059:Fair representation without bias:
14:
1184:MacPhee, 1994, p. 11</ref: -->
1088:, when possible and appropriate?:
775:One that Lamberton attributed to
1128:
1111:
1099:
1075:
1060:
1041:
1033:
1018:
1007:
999:
980:
969:
464:
386:
376:
349:
273:
263:
242:
211:
130:
52:
19:
1827:WikiProject Madagascar articles
1473:rather than one of the derived
439:This article has been rated as
328:This article has been rated as
1812:Low-importance Africa articles
1797:Low-importance mammal articles
1735:I agree. That change made to
1155:In defense of an edit reverted
1:
1758:15:40, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
1662:01:33, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
1590:01:17, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
1439:19:10, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
1414:19:00, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
1332:16:56, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
1266:16:45, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
1230:15:45, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
1211:15:24, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
477:This article is supported by
413:and see a list of open tasks.
308:Knowledge:WikiProject Mammals
302:and see a list of open tasks.
1817:FA-Class Madagascar articles
1802:WikiProject Mammals articles
1129:
1076:
1061:
1042:
1034:
1019:
1008:
1000:
981:
970:
555:06:58, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
419:Knowledge:WikiProject Africa
311:Template:WikiProject Mammals
1832:WikiProject Africa articles
1772:Knowledge featured articles
1739:was pretty much pointless.
852:good point. revert then :)
422:Template:WikiProject Africa
160:The text of the entry was:
1848:
989:2. Factually accurate and
577:17:24, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
445:project's importance scale
334:project's importance scale
116:Featured article candidate
594:Talk:Plesiorycteropus/GA1
460:
438:
371:
327:
258:
237:
197:
71:
67:
1807:FA-Class Africa articles
1792:FA-Class mammal articles
1149:14:18, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
955:13:58, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
931:13:51, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
920:13:37, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
897:13:37, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
868:08:07, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
848:06:27, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
829:08:08, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
809:06:23, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
739:06:23, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
686:13:34, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
639:05:48, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
619:05:48, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
545:15:31, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
533:06:06, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
511:21:26, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
61:Today's featured article
998:References to sources:
1427:Template:Citation/core
1320:User:Ucucha/HarvErrors
1027:3. Broad in coverage?:
480:WikiProject Madagascar
457:
219:This article is rated
1524:or related templates.
1288:and friends than use
1069:5. Reasonably stable?
1052:neutral point of view
800:- "years ago" simpler
644:Thanks for reviewing!
456:
63:on February 24, 2019.
1298:; probably more use
1015:No original research
623:Okay, let's begin -
560:Bizarre? Mysterious?
97:Good article nominee
1096:fair use rationales
926:shouldn't do that.
796:2150 Before Present
289:WikiProject Mammals
41:Knowledge community
1084:6. Illustrated by
542:Francisco Valverde
508:Francisco Valverde
458:
402:WikiProject Africa
225:content assessment
72:Article milestones
1750:Trappist the monk
1582:Trappist the monk
1512:§Literature cited
1406:Trappist the monk
1258:Trappist the monk
1203:Trappist the monk
1181:§Literature cited
1108:suitable captions
963:1. Well written?:
565:Plesiorycteropus
530:
516:Please go to the
499:
498:
495:
494:
491:
490:
472:Madagascar portal
344:
343:
340:
339:
205:
204:
125:
124:
1839:
1730:
1724:
1720:
1714:
1711:As an aside, if
1706:
1700:
1696:
1690:
1647:
1637:
1631:
1627:
1621:
1523:
1517:
1514:encapsulated in
1482:
1476:
1472:
1466:
1322:script I wrote.
1317:
1311:
1307:
1301:
1297:
1291:
1287:
1281:
1132:
1131:
1115:
1114:
1103:
1102:
1079:
1078:
1064:
1063:
1045:
1044:
1037:
1036:
1022:
1021:
1011:
1010:
1003:
1002:
984:
983:
973:
972:
720:Added something.
528:
474:
469:
468:
467:
427:
426:
423:
420:
417:
396:
391:
390:
389:
380:
373:
372:
367:
364:
353:
346:
316:
315:
312:
309:
306:
283:
278:
277:
267:
260:
259:
254:
246:
239:
222:
216:
215:
207:
200:Featured article
198:Current status:
166:Plesiorycteropus
134:
111:
92:
69:
56:
31:featured article
27:Plesiorycteropus
23:
16:
1847:
1846:
1842:
1841:
1840:
1838:
1837:
1836:
1762:
1761:
1728:
1722:
1718:
1712:
1704:
1698:
1694:
1688:
1643:
1642:templates, and
1635:
1629:
1625:
1619:
1521:
1515:
1480:
1474:
1470:
1464:
1315:
1309:
1305:
1299:
1295:
1289:
1285:
1279:
1157:
1032:Major aspects:
977:Manual of Style
968:Prose quality:
935:Fair enough. I
661:pair of species
588:This review is
584:
562:
504:
470:
465:
463:
425:Africa articles
424:
421:
418:
415:
414:
392:
387:
385:
365:
359:
314:mammal articles
313:
310:
307:
304:
303:
279:
272:
252:
223:on Knowledge's
220:
193:
192:
158:
107:
88:
12:
11:
5:
1845:
1843:
1835:
1834:
1829:
1824:
1819:
1814:
1809:
1804:
1799:
1794:
1789:
1784:
1779:
1774:
1764:
1763:
1677:
1676:
1675:
1674:
1673:
1672:
1671:
1670:
1669:
1668:
1667:
1666:
1665:
1664:
1639:
1603:
1602:
1601:
1600:
1599:
1598:
1597:
1596:
1595:
1594:
1593:
1592:
1567:
1566:
1565:
1564:
1563:
1562:
1561:
1560:
1559:
1558:
1557:
1556:
1538:
1537:
1536:
1535:
1534:
1533:
1532:
1531:
1530:
1529:
1528:
1527:
1526:
1525:
1495:
1494:
1493:
1492:
1491:
1490:
1489:
1488:
1487:
1486:
1485:
1484:
1450:
1449:
1448:
1447:
1446:
1445:
1444:
1443:
1442:
1441:
1423:
1395:
1394:
1393:
1392:
1391:
1390:
1389:
1388:
1377:
1376:
1375:
1374:
1373:
1372:
1371:
1370:
1356:
1355:
1354:
1353:
1352:
1351:
1350:
1349:
1339:
1338:
1337:
1336:
1335:
1334:
1275:
1251:
1250:
1249:
1248:
1242:
1241:
1240:
1239:
1233:
1232:
1217:
1156:
1153:
1152:
1151:
1127:Pass or Fail:
1119:
1117:
1116:
1104:
1081:
1080:
1066:
1065:
1050:4. Reflects a
1047:
1046:
1038:
1024:
1023:
1012:
1004:
986:
985:
974:
960:
959:
958:
957:
902:
901:
900:
899:
875:
874:
873:
872:
871:
870:
838:
837:
836:
835:
834:
833:
832:
831:
789:
788:
787:
786:
785:
784:
762:
761:
760:
759:
758:
757:
746:
745:
744:
743:
742:
741:
723:
722:
721:
710:
709:
708:
707:
695:
694:
693:
692:
691:
690:
689:
688:
646:
645:
599:
598:
583:
580:
570:
569:
561:
558:
548:
547:
536:
535:
503:
502:Photo required
500:
497:
496:
493:
492:
489:
488:
485:Low-importance
476:
475:
459:
449:
448:
441:Low-importance
437:
431:
430:
428:
411:the discussion
398:
397:
381:
369:
368:
366:Low‑importance
354:
342:
341:
338:
337:
330:Low-importance
326:
320:
319:
317:
300:the discussion
285:
284:
281:Mammals portal
268:
256:
255:
253:Low‑importance
247:
235:
234:
228:
217:
203:
202:
195:
194:
159:
138:
137:
135:
127:
126:
123:
122:
119:
112:
104:
103:
100:
93:
85:
84:
81:
78:
74:
73:
65:
64:
57:
49:
48:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1844:
1833:
1830:
1828:
1825:
1823:
1820:
1818:
1815:
1813:
1810:
1808:
1805:
1803:
1800:
1798:
1795:
1793:
1790:
1788:
1785:
1783:
1780:
1778:
1775:
1773:
1770:
1769:
1767:
1760:
1759:
1755:
1751:
1746:
1744:
1740:
1738:
1733:
1727:
1717:
1709:
1703:
1693:
1686:
1681:
1663:
1659:
1655:
1651:
1646:
1640:
1634:
1624:
1617:
1616:
1615:
1614:
1613:
1612:
1611:
1610:
1609:
1608:
1607:
1606:
1605:
1604:
1591:
1587:
1583:
1579:
1578:
1577:
1576:
1575:
1574:
1573:
1572:
1571:
1570:
1569:
1568:
1554:
1550:
1549:
1548:
1547:
1546:
1545:
1544:
1543:
1542:
1541:
1540:
1539:
1520:
1513:
1509:
1508:
1507:
1506:
1505:
1504:
1503:
1502:
1501:
1500:
1499:
1498:
1497:
1496:
1479:
1469:
1462:
1461:
1460:
1459:
1458:
1457:
1456:
1455:
1454:
1453:
1452:
1451:
1440:
1436:
1432:
1428:
1424:
1420:
1417:
1416:
1415:
1411:
1407:
1403:
1402:
1401:
1400:
1399:
1398:
1397:
1396:
1385:
1384:
1383:
1382:
1381:
1380:
1379:
1378:
1368:
1364:
1363:
1362:
1361:
1360:
1359:
1358:
1357:
1347:
1346:
1345:
1344:
1343:
1342:
1341:
1340:
1333:
1329:
1325:
1321:
1314:
1304:
1294:
1284:
1276:
1273:
1269:
1268:
1267:
1263:
1259:
1255:
1254:
1253:
1252:
1246:
1245:
1244:
1243:
1237:
1236:
1235:
1234:
1231:
1227:
1223:
1218:
1215:
1214:
1213:
1212:
1208:
1204:
1199:
1197:
1193:
1188:
1182:
1177:
1173:
1169:
1167:
1162:
1154:
1150:
1146:
1143:
1140:
1136:
1126:
1125:
1124:
1122:
1109:
1105:
1097:
1093:
1092:
1091:
1089:
1087:
1073:
1072:
1071:
1070:
1058:
1057:
1056:
1055:
1053:
1039:
1031:
1030:
1029:
1028:
1016:
1013:
1005:
997:
996:
995:
994:
992:
978:
975:
967:
966:
965:
964:
956:
952:
949:
946:
942:
938:
934:
933:
932:
929:
924:
923:
922:
921:
917:
914:
911:
907:
898:
894:
891:
888:
884:
879:
878:
877:
876:
869:
865:
862:
859:
855:
851:
850:
849:
846:
842:
841:
840:
839:
830:
826:
823:
820:
816:
812:
811:
810:
807:
803:
802:
801:
798:
797:
793:
792:
791:
790:
782:
778:
774:
773:
771:
770:
766:
765:
764:
763:
755:
754:
753:
750:
749:
748:
747:
740:
737:
732:
731:
730:
728:
724:
719:
718:
717:
714:
713:
712:
711:
705:
703:
699:
698:
697:
696:
687:
683:
680:
677:
673:
669:
668:
666:
665:
664:
662:
658:
654:
650:
649:
648:
647:
643:
642:
641:
640:
636:
633:
630:
626:
621:
620:
616:
613:
610:
606:
603:
597:
595:
591:
586:
585:
581:
579:
578:
575:
568:
564:
563:
559:
557:
556:
553:
552:KnowledgeLord
546:
543:
538:
537:
534:
531:
526:
522:
519:
515:
514:
513:
512:
509:
501:
486:
483:(assessed as
482:
481:
473:
462:
455:
451:
450:
446:
442:
436:
433:
432:
429:
412:
408:
404:
403:
395:
394:Africa portal
384:
382:
379:
375:
374:
370:
363:
358:
355:
352:
348:
335:
331:
325:
322:
321:
318:
301:
297:
296:
291:
290:
282:
276:
271:
269:
266:
262:
261:
257:
251:
248:
245:
241:
236:
232:
226:
218:
214:
209:
208:
201:
196:
191:
189:
188:giant aye-aye
185:
181:
177:
173:
168:
167:
163:
156:
155:
150:
148:
147:Did you know?
142:
136:
133:
129:
128:
120:
118:
117:
113:
110:
106:
105:
101:
99:
98:
94:
91:
87:
86:
82:
79:
76:
75:
70:
66:
62:
58:
55:
51:
50:
46:
42:
38:
37:
32:
28:
25:
22:
18:
17:
1747:
1741:
1734:
1710:
1682:
1678:
1283:Cite journal
1200:
1189:
1178:
1174:
1170:
1158:
1141:
1120:
1118:
1083:
1082:
1068:
1067:
1049:
1048:
1026:
1025:
988:
987:
979:compliance:
962:
961:
947:
936:
912:
903:
889:
860:
821:
799:
795:
794:
780:
776:
768:
767:
756:Changed two.
751:
726:
725:
715:
701:
700:
678:
660:
656:
652:
651:
631:
622:
611:
601:
600:
587:
571:
566:
549:
505:
478:
440:
400:
329:
293:
287:
231:WikiProjects
199:
169:
164:
161:
154:May 31, 2010
152:
144:
114:
109:July 2, 2010
95:
90:June 2, 2010
45:please do so
34:
26:
590:transcluded
1766:Categories
1743:WP:CITEVAR
1650:WP:CITEVAR
1638:templates.
1387:templates.
1192:Bananaquit
1166:WP:REFNEST
991:verifiable
362:Madagascar
151:column on
36:identified
1519:Cite book
1040:Focused:
602:Reviewer:
582:GA Review
176:aardvarks
172:hedgehogs
141:Main Page
1468:Citation
1422:minimal.
1293:Citation
1145:contribs
1135:Casliber
951:contribs
941:Casliber
916:contribs
906:Casliber
893:contribs
883:Casliber
864:contribs
854:Casliber
825:contribs
815:Casliber
682:contribs
672:Casliber
635:contribs
625:Casliber
615:contribs
605:Casliber
221:FA-class
186:and the
170:include
121:Promoted
1737:Voalavo
1121:Overall
443:on the
332:on the
305:Mammals
250:Mammals
184:rodents
180:hyraxes
143:in the
80:Process
1685:WP:LDR
1654:Ucucha
1553:WP:LDR
1431:Ucucha
1419:WP:LDR
1367:WP:LDR
1324:Ucucha
1313:Harvnb
1272:WP:LDR
1222:Ucucha
1161:Ucucha
1086:images
928:Ucucha
845:Ucucha
806:Ucucha
736:Ucucha
529:(talk)
525:Ucucha
416:Africa
407:Africa
357:Africa
295:mammal
227:scale.
178:, and
102:Listed
83:Result
1645:still
1308:than
657:genus
592:from
574:JyriL
29:is a
1754:talk
1726:Note
1721:and
1702:Note
1697:and
1658:talk
1633:note
1628:and
1586:talk
1478:Cite
1435:talk
1410:talk
1328:talk
1262:talk
1226:talk
1207:talk
1194:and
1139:talk
945:talk
937:knew
910:talk
887:talk
858:talk
819:talk
676:talk
629:talk
609:talk
518:AMNH
77:Date
1716:Ref
1692:Ref
1623:ref
1365:If
1303:Sfn
1123::
659:or
435:Low
324:Low
1768::
1756:)
1748:--
1729:}}
1723:{{
1719:}}
1713:{{
1705:}}
1699:{{
1695:}}
1689:{{
1660:)
1636:}}
1630:{{
1626:}}
1620:{{
1588:)
1580:--
1522:}}
1516:{{
1481:}}
1475:{{
1471:}}
1465:{{
1437:)
1412:)
1404:--
1330:)
1316:}}
1310:{{
1306:}}
1300:{{
1296:}}
1290:{{
1286:}}
1280:{{
1264:)
1256:--
1228:)
1209:)
1201:--
1187:.
1147:)
1110::
1098::
1054:?:
1017::
993:?:
953:)
918:)
895:)
866:)
827:)
781:P.
777:P.
684:)
637:)
617:)
540:--
487:).
360::
174:,
1752:(
1656:(
1584:(
1433:(
1408:(
1326:(
1260:(
1224:(
1205:(
1142:·
1137:(
948:·
943:(
913:·
908:(
890:·
885:(
861:·
856:(
822:·
817:(
679:·
674:(
663:.
632:·
627:(
612:·
607:(
447:.
336:.
233::
190:?
157:.
149:"
145:"
47:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
