612:
559:
544:
525:
517:
502:
491:
483:
464:
453:
595:
583:
362:
I notice there are no images (not surprising given the subject matter, but I feel it could be a little more visually appealing. Maybe a map of madagascar with the locations of where remains have been recovered? Or a crude anatomical diagram with the bones which have been recovered (this would be hard
407:
Visionholder has kindly offered to make a map; I'll send him the locality list from MacPhee '94. By the way, there was a reconstruction in an earlier version of this article, but I threw it out because it was reconstructed as an aardvark-like mammal and sources like Walker (1999) explicitly say we
215:
Actually, he found little support in the data from
Patterson's and Thewissen's papers—he writes that Patterson in particular was (to put it bluntly) interpreting the data tendentiously in support of tubulidentate affinities.
265:
because they don't look like phalanges from nesomyines, euplerids, or tenrecs. I have gotten rid of the phrase, because it seems to be more problematic than enlightening.
261:
is from a large lemur according to MacPhee; and for the distal phalanges MacPhee says explicitly that their identification was problematic, but he identifies them as
149:
Now "eutherian mammalian genus". Sounds a little awkward, but I think it's good to put both the precise "eutherian" and the more common-knowledge "mammalian" in.
325:
Oh, and a question for you: you changed "multiple species" to "more species". I like "multiple" better there, because it more clearly means "more than one".
66:
62:
188:
oops, forgot there was only one species of aardvark. Still, I think that sentence and the next needs rewording. I will have a think about it.
47:
39:
577:
626:
432:
397:
374:
345:
306:
163:
116:
96:
254:- could be stated more simply, begs the question why "problematic" - just becuase they are very generic looking bones?
421:
it was going to be tricky if possible at all, so disregard. Map or lack thereof not a deal-breaker really so......
458:
55:
17:
209:
Ross MacPhee found little support for the tubulidentate affinities of
Plesiorycteropus (in their data)
620:
426:
391:
368:
339:
300:
157:
110:
90:
363:
I realise...) Any other ideas welcomed. I can help make a map if I have an image to work from.
386:
Anyway, nearly there pending query above on images. I trust all sources have been scoured...
567:
409:
326:
287:
217:
211:- bracketed bit redundant as it is clear McPhee is looking into the data of the 1994 study.
32:
533:
152:
Agree, again precision trumps simplicity I think here as meaning is blurred otherwise.
616:
589:
496:
422:
387:
364:
335:
296:
153:
106:
86:
198:
Lead needs to have some basic size figures in it as well as when it became extinct.
472:
630:
436:
412:
401:
378:
349:
329:
310:
290:
220:
167:
120:
100:
186:- "with the aardvarks" or "as an aardvark" - sounds funny as a group noun.
615:- prose probably could do with some more massaging but enough for GA.
556:
No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):
588:
Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with
137:-if it is a pair of species may be better described as a
74:
43:
576:
Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have
234:
Also "affinities" used in three sentences in a row.
251:the identification of which is partly problematic,
488:Citations to reliable sources, where required:
286:But wrong; "Before Present" means before 1950.
8:
295:Wow, I did not know that. okay nevermind.
135:is a recently extinct eutherian mammal
7:
572:(none currently but some will help)
184:it was classified with the aardvark
594:
582:
541:Fair representation without bias:
24:
570:, when possible and appropriate?:
257:One that Lamberton attributed to
610:
593:
581:
557:
542:
523:
515:
500:
489:
481:
462:
451:
1:
611:
558:
543:
524:
516:
501:
490:
482:
463:
452:
334:good point. revert then :)
647:
471:2. Factually accurate and
631:14:18, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
437:13:58, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
413:13:51, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
402:13:37, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
379:13:37, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
350:08:07, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
330:06:27, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
311:08:08, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
291:06:23, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
221:06:23, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
168:13:34, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
121:05:48, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
101:05:48, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
480:References to sources:
509:3. Broad in coverage?:
551:5. Reasonably stable?
534:neutral point of view
282:- "years ago" simpler
126:Thanks for reviewing!
18:Talk:Plesiorycteropus
497:No original research
105:Okay, let's begin -
578:fair use rationales
408:shouldn't do that.
278:2150 Before Present
566:6. Illustrated by
590:suitable captions
445:1. Well written?:
638:
614:
613:
597:
596:
585:
584:
561:
560:
546:
545:
527:
526:
519:
518:
504:
503:
493:
492:
485:
484:
466:
465:
455:
454:
202:Added something.
79:
70:
51:
646:
645:
641:
640:
639:
637:
636:
635:
514:Major aspects:
459:Manual of Style
450:Prose quality:
417:Fair enough. I
143:pair of species
60:
37:
31:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
644:
642:
634:
633:
609:Pass or Fail:
601:
599:
598:
586:
563:
562:
548:
547:
532:4. Reflects a
529:
528:
520:
506:
505:
494:
486:
468:
467:
456:
442:
441:
440:
439:
384:
383:
382:
381:
357:
356:
355:
354:
353:
352:
320:
319:
318:
317:
316:
315:
314:
313:
271:
270:
269:
268:
267:
266:
244:
243:
242:
241:
240:
239:
228:
227:
226:
225:
224:
223:
205:
204:
203:
192:
191:
190:
189:
177:
176:
175:
174:
173:
172:
171:
170:
128:
127:
80:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
643:
632:
628:
625:
622:
618:
608:
607:
606:
604:
591:
587:
579:
575:
574:
573:
571:
569:
555:
554:
553:
552:
540:
539:
538:
537:
535:
521:
513:
512:
511:
510:
498:
495:
487:
479:
478:
477:
476:
474:
460:
457:
449:
448:
447:
446:
438:
434:
431:
428:
424:
420:
416:
415:
414:
411:
406:
405:
404:
403:
399:
396:
393:
389:
380:
376:
373:
370:
366:
361:
360:
359:
358:
351:
347:
344:
341:
337:
333:
332:
331:
328:
324:
323:
322:
321:
312:
308:
305:
302:
298:
294:
293:
292:
289:
285:
284:
283:
280:
279:
275:
274:
273:
272:
264:
260:
256:
255:
253:
252:
248:
247:
246:
245:
237:
236:
235:
232:
231:
230:
229:
222:
219:
214:
213:
212:
210:
206:
201:
200:
199:
196:
195:
194:
193:
187:
185:
181:
180:
179:
178:
169:
165:
162:
159:
155:
151:
150:
148:
147:
146:
144:
140:
136:
132:
131:
130:
129:
125:
124:
123:
122:
118:
115:
112:
108:
103:
102:
98:
95:
92:
88:
85:
81:
78:
77:
73:
68:
64:
59:
58:
54:
49:
45:
41:
36:
35:
26:
19:
623:
602:
600:
565:
564:
550:
549:
531:
530:
508:
507:
470:
469:
461:compliance:
444:
443:
429:
418:
394:
385:
371:
342:
303:
281:
277:
276:
262:
258:
250:
249:
238:Changed two.
233:
208:
207:
197:
183:
182:
160:
142:
138:
134:
133:
113:
104:
93:
83:
82:
75:
71:
57:Article talk
56:
52:
33:
30:
44:visual edit
473:verifiable
522:Focused:
84:Reviewer:
27:GA Review
627:contribs
617:Casliber
433:contribs
423:Casliber
398:contribs
388:Casliber
375:contribs
365:Casliber
346:contribs
336:Casliber
307:contribs
297:Casliber
164:contribs
154:Casliber
117:contribs
107:Casliber
97:contribs
87:Casliber
603:Overall
67:history
48:history
34:Article
568:images
410:Ucucha
327:Ucucha
288:Ucucha
218:Ucucha
139:genus
76:Watch
16:<
621:talk
427:talk
419:knew
392:talk
369:talk
340:talk
301:talk
158:talk
111:talk
91:talk
63:edit
40:edit
605::
141:or
629:)
592::
580::
536:?:
499::
475:?:
435:)
400:)
377:)
348:)
309:)
263:P.
259:P.
166:)
119:)
99:)
65:|
46:|
42:|
624:·
619:(
430:·
425:(
395:·
390:(
372:·
367:(
343:·
338:(
304:·
299:(
161:·
156:(
145:.
114:·
109:(
94:·
89:(
72:·
69:)
61:(
53:·
50:)
38:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.