628:
are infamous because they can so easily be manipulated and skewed (not regarding prayer alone mind you, but regarding the effectiveness of our prison system and other matters). Unless it can be scientifically demonstrated that prayer is the direct cause of a recovery it shouldn't be suggested that prayer works. I'll say to you something similar to what I say to my pagan friends who try to get me to believe in magic "Show me a man's severed head being reattached without any human intervention due to prayer, and I'll believe it. Repeat the process before others, and it becomes science" (To them I say "I'll believe in magic when you conjure a fireball and light a campfire with it"). Don't get me wrong, I'm not criticizing belief in prayer, and I'm not saying that it doesn't have it's benefits. As a
Psychiatrist I'm actually rather certain that prayer can have benefits on the overall health to a person (rather it's prayer to the Abrahamic God, pagan gods, or some unknown and undefined power). To be honest I have never known prayer to cure an illness that one wouldn't either recover from naturally or that wasn't being treated by worldly means.
156:
Thus, taking the structure of the articlea and chronology of the religions' appearance into account, I rearranged the more general discussions to appear at the top and the religions to each be dealt with separately in order of their ages. I think, more so than even
Judaism and Buddhism, Islam needs to be better represented, if only for its massive world population. It also has a very rigid and codified system of prayer, which would be interesting in contrast to the more widely differing sects within other religions. Also, in generalized statements about religion, I excised a statement or added other examples to balance what is sometimes unintentional bible-centralization. Example: "confession of sins" is a solely Christian concept, and while it may find analogies in other religions, it is certainly not one of the four primary forms of prayer when a world view is seen. I base this not only the number of other religions, but the number of adherents to different faiths. I also believe that the
2198:. There's a couple problems with this. First not all prayer is to made to influence future events; I would actually state that the majority of prayer is done in praise of God and communication with God. Thus the premise fails for all prayers. Secondly prayer does affect the person saying it; there are many studies that show people who pray become more happy, etc (they are not praying for a specific event, but instead the act of prayer itself changes the mood of the person saying it). Thirdly there is a leap from stating that since the journal articles have found no efficacy that prayer is superstition. Unless the journal articles themselves state that it is superstition, you are performing original work, and making your own interpretation of the result. Thus I feel the superstition category should be removed. --
1236:
tolerate what you want and remove the rest. The Bahai link is a perfect example. It has absolutely no more validity than any of the other links removed, yet it remains because you are Bahai, and the others know you'll raise a stink if it's removed. Face it, rather than allow a link that may seem to be pro-American (when it simply is about
America and who to pray for) you pretend that written prayers are irrelevant to prayer, unless it's a Bahai written prayer. You've shredded neutrality. You've set the standard that acknowledgement of forms of prayer you don't approve of are not allowed. You censor, and pontificate about "doing the right thing". A crowd of bigots are still as ignorant. Plurality rarely justified closed-mindedness.
675:
relief in one's burden by putting one's trust in a higher power. In other instances it may increase a person's moral, particularly if that person believes that the god or gods they pray to will help them. I've seen firsthand the physical benefits of prayer when a relative was able to relax after putting his condition "in God's hands" (his words). I've also seen how it inspires people to know that they're being prayed for, if for no other reason to know that others care. I'm an avid secularist (and semantically implicit atheist) myself, but I think the benefits of prayer can be very real, even if entirely worldly and secular.
3225:). If people claim their methods enable them to reach reliable conclusions about whether prayer "works" or not we should report their claims, but strongly suggest not endorsing these claims as fact or stating an editorial view about whether religious claims can or cannot be validly subjected to scientific testing. Note that one has to be very careful with these things, particularly ones definition of "success". If "success" means lots of power, money, or sex, for example, sports and entertainment figures, business executives, and politicians may well be more successful than scientists. Best, --
407:
editing this article, understand that there are more gods than your "God" and the process of prayer should be attributed to most gods of most religions, not just one. I understand that using the phrase "a god or gods" wherever there is a mention of "God" might become tiresome to read but perhaps that means there is a problem with the way the article is written. I suggest rewording the text to eliminate the many instances of "God" and replace where needed with "a god or gods" to make this article more-NPOV. Only use "God" and "Allah" in the appropriate subsections.
695:
access to this game he was suffering from complications similar to acid reflux due to extreme stress, but once he started playing the game for four hours at a time he suddenly became rather relaxed and the reduced stress made it easier to treat him and reduced other complications, and his moral increased so much that he wanted to get out and go for walks (a large improvement over not wanting to leave his bed). In fact most patients who played this game seemed to relax more, be in higher spirits, and be in better overall mental health. --
2382:{IVF-ET] who were unaware of the study. We chose the setting of IVF-ET in order to control for as many variables as possible and designed the study to be masked to patients, providers and investigators. In planning and conducting this trial in as rigorous a fashion as possible, we set out with the expectation that we would show no benefit of IP. None of the authors are employed by religious organizations, and we were not asked by any religious groups to conduct this trial, nor did we seek religious advice at any time.
1202:
whatever) so the links to site with written prayers is important. Lists are also important to some people. Above someone asks about the Rosary, and as a
Baptist (not a Roman Catholic) I'm shocked that it's not mentioned--and that someone would think it shouldn't be. Obviously there's some odd bias in editing this entry, and you need to step back, lose the intolerance, and accept that prayer may mean something you persoanlly aren't familiar with. Please put back the links (all of them) and stop being so obtuse.
1172:
your personal policy, yet you have not removed them. The site I linked to provides a prayer list for people to use when praying for
America. Bahá'í prayers and Sacred Space provide specific prayers (the wording or a list seems a difference without distinction). Live Prayer Network and Prayer Software offer other features for those wanting to pray, still the same idea. I could easily remove hundreds if not thousands of links using the guidelines you want applied only to this one link. My link does fit #5 and #6.
1545:, with the (huge) added drawback that it must necessarily be either a highly biased and limited list of links or else must either be expanded beyond all reason (undesirable). Both existing links should be removed. External links should be about prayer as a topic, such as a psychological study on the effects of prayer, rather than propagating listcruft and resources available (better organized) elsewhere. One puppy's opinion, but the prayer sites currently linked are not germaine to this article.
713:" I don't know where prayer has been falsified, especially given that prayer, as an activity (not a hypothesis), is outside the realm of falsifiability (just as one cannot falsify an orange or jogging). Furthermore, prayer may be undertaken as an attempt to produce any of myriad benefits, as LucaviX discussed. In any event, prayer cannot be intrinsically linked to a falsified hypothesis, and, as such, is ill suited to the superstition cat.
2423:), another, for something involving identity theft, was put in jail, and two of the three (I'm not sure if it was the first two or not) ended up having already written articles supporting 'intercessory prayer.' Apparently, all this lead to complains for further research into this matter, which, after this extended research was done, was replied to in the "Journal of Reproductive Medicine's" Letters to the Editor section on July 5'th 2006.
2156:
and omniscient. This article even says that. "There are a number of philosophical paradoxes involving prayer to an omnipotent God, namely:" However, someone seems to have misudnerstood this section, and rewritten it to apply to just any plain old supernatural deity. But these paradoxes do not exist in such cases. Only in the omnipotent and omniscient case. So I am fixing. Hope this works.
376:
3221:
general one, Royal Navy sailors, to a general one. But if one takes the same approach with, say, medical care and selects a highly cared-for group like intensive care patients and compares it with a general population, would anyone really think it legitimate to assume that if medical care "works", the highly-cared-for intensive-care group ought to live longer than the general one? (See
769:(I assume that you're quoting from the article here; I didn't bother to check) doesn't reflect on anything inherent about prayer, which is an activity not per-se bound to any belief about its effects. Additionally, you are assuming a-priori that any spiritual-causal potency of prayer is universally held to be provably non-existent. P.S. Isn't it a bit inconsistant to claim that you "
443:
adress this but I thought atleast giving my two cents worth would be good. Maybe people need to edit parts which they dont have vested interest in either direction. I know I have vested interest in certain things and it can be hard to stay level in my writting (thats why this is a good place if I go too far in a direction someone can can catch me.--
581:, perhaps your objections could be better served in an article summarizing the skeptic's response to prayer as it is formalized in various world religions. A link to such an article would perhaps be appropriate here at the end of the article, but what you're suggesting now is a bit short on objectivity, I think.
2625:
Here's that quote. I think it's pretty on topic, though. Though many believe prayer is good and effective just on it's own, a more petitionary opinion on prayer can easily lead to a scenario where a contacted entity would refuse to grant prayers 'read off a sheet' for the purpose of being tested (the
2615:
Even if all the things that people prayed for happened -- which they do not -- this would not prove what
Christians mean by the efficacy of prayer. For prayer is request. The essence of request, as distinct from compulsion, is that it may or may not be granted. And if an infinitely wise Being listens
1098:
Sites that contain neutral and accurate material not already in the article. Ideally this content should be integrated into the
Knowledge article, then the link would remain as a reference, but in some cases this is not possible for copyright reasons or because the site has a level of detail which is
1083:
On articles with multiple points of view, a link to prominent sites dedicated to each, with a detailed explanation of each link. The number of links dedicated to one point of view should not overwhelm the number dedicated to any other. One should attempt to add comments to these links informing the
1021:
I agree, the link seems to conform to every policy except perhaps that the above member seems to be associated with the page itself, a policy widely ignored across the entire site. I see nothing wrong with the link and find it odd that anyone would. In fact I think people from other nations should be
912:
Other than the article suggests, ending each prayer with the phrase "In Jesus' Name" doesn't strike me as something that all, or even most, Christians do. Rather it seems to be mostly something done in certain sections of
American Protestantism. Maybe somebody could rephrase that part of the article.
751:
Now, I don't wish to insult anyone's religious beliefs. If they make the individual feel better about some aspect of reality, that's great. Religious theories are only maintained out of usefulness (the evolutionary advantage to abandoning religious thought would otherwise have long since eliminated
690:
I've also noticed that atheist and secularist who find (responsible) alternative therapies to prayer seem to be in better overall mental and physical health than those who do not (playing certain games and painting often seems to help). One particular example was a self proclaimed atheist (I think he
594:
religious practice or system, but this fact alone does not justify applying "category"-based pejoratives to each article that deals with faith issues. We are under no obligation to mimic the rhetoric of partisans on either side of a debate when categorizing a given phenomenon, and I believe it is POV
3067:
To
Bachrach44, I'm just saying that the general tone of the article seems to support that prayer works, while there is hardly anything said about the scientific stance that isn't assaulted over (before my revisions of course). To JFW, I removed from the experimental section to make it 1 to 1, and I
2895:
Yes, I agree now that the article does not need a critism section, but I'm saying that the general tone of the article is biased, pardoning only the evaluation section which is neutral. I'll try tweaking the article to make it more NPOV, but I'm just saying that I am not experienced enough to do so
2634:
I have studied prayer for a long time now and I would like to rewrite the base of this article, particularly the opening. Most of the content will remain I just want to change the way the article is written, I know what I'm talking about in this area and this change will be mild at best, i know this
2155:
Hope I can help here! there is a section here called "Philosophical paradoxes of prayer". I've read about this. Its abou prayer to the jewish/muslim/christian omnipotent and omniscient god. These paradoxes do not apply - they do not even exist - when we consider gods who are not both omnipotent
1126:
John and Danny: I agree that this link is not appropriate. It does not add anything to the article. Your use of multiple accounts to defend the inclusion of the link is dubious. Should you wish to include the link, please offer a serious argument on why it should be included, addressing our external
556:
Categories are not used to enforce NPOV. I do not see how my profession should be of relevance here; in fact, in my profession it is accepted that labeling people's behaviour such-and-such is generally detrimental. The doctors ("US religious nutters") still managed to get their research published in
228:
The
Masoretic texts have been traced fairly accurately that while dated only at 800a.d.at the earliest show no variation over vast geological areas between isolated Jewish communities letting it be surmised this isolation and correlation proves lack of changed at least since they were forced out of
3220:
Hi! I don't have a problem with having an Experimental Evaluation of Prayer section, but would suggest care not to state conclusions that extend beyond what theses studies can actually support. For example, Galton concluded prayer is inefficacious after comparing a highly-prayed-for population to a
3171:
I have no idea why you reinstated the paragraph I deleted. Jeff3000 removed this with comment tags many moons ago, and nobody was particularly bothered by this. Upon reading it, I felt immediately that it was an essay by someone and that unless that someone could come back to provide sources it was
2714:
I bear not to question why this article does not contain a critism section. The general tone of the article implies that prayer actually works, but I think that we should also include the scientific POV as well. I personally am not too knowledgable of the matter, but I highly suggest that someone
1171:
Apparently I, as well as many others, misunderstood the severity of the policies. I see few external links on any articles that are able to fit your extreme definition. Why, for instance, did you not also remove Bahá'í prayers, Sacred Space, Live Prayer Network and Prayer Software? None of them fit
682:
and mental health at Vanderbilt Hospital, not simply regarding prayer mind you but regarding many things (including meditation). As for the psychological benefits, I've noticed that people who pray are typically happier and more content with their lives, suffering from less anxiety and proving less
648:
No, prayer as a therapeutic practice. Prayer often helps people cope with things such as unexpected tragedy, loss of work, and other problems. There are types of prayer which most psychiatrist would consider psychologically unhealthy as well (such as begging a divinity for something) but most forms
422:
First of all, where is the fact proving this statement? Secondly, Islam is religion given to us from God, Allah, yehwe, whatever you want to call him (see Ahmed Deedat's books for more info). Therefore, it is only logical that Christians have the Old Testament as part of their Bible as Christianity
327:
This sentence, "one such study (Byrd, 1988), with a double-blind design, showed with a p-value of 0.0001 that intercessory prayer to the Judeo-Christian god had a positive effect on a coronary care unit population," is all well and good, but what does the p-value mean? I've taken a look at the page
280:
I believe the Jewish Services that have what could be called a liturgy outdate you guys by about 1000 years or so, and claiming that the Roman Catholic Liturgy is unchanged n 2000 years is inaccurate, for example the many Eastern Orthox churches all have different liturgies and they are just as old
144:
IHCOYC, those are good points. I don't know, but I would imagine that in many Muslim countries it's required or nearly so for everyone to face Mecca and at least assume the appropriate posture of prayer if one of the daily prayer times happens to fall during school hours. I could imagine this could
3085:
Ian, what exactly is "1 to 1"? And why are you being so unbelievably vague about what exactly is wrong with the article? "The general tone seems to support..." is really not sufficient to make such a fuss over it. Nowhere does the article literally claim that prayer works. Rather, it describes how
2980:
Knowledge doesn't run on 2-1 majority decisions - we work to form a consensus. Time and further debate may bear your point out, and it may not. Until then there is no need to continue to beat another editor over the head with "please accept the majority view". Remember that time is not the issue -
2496:
I see you went right ahead and deleted them anyway. I have restored these, which your cautionary tags. I think the paradoxes form an important part of this article, I'm happy to discuss the specific problems you have with them and how we may go about re-writing them. I think deletion is a slightly
2105:
My edit is supposed to express that prayer is a "worded" way to communicate. But there are non-worded ways to communicate as well. For example, to sit in quiet silence awaiting communication. That would not be considered "praying". I'm not sure that "worded" is the right way to express it, but
1235:
Except the Bahai link is no more valid than any of the others, yet it remains. Why would I waste time including info on the Rosary when any anti-Catholic bigot can remove it as easily as you anti-American bigots have not only removed my link, but others, to pretend to justify your intolerance. You
889:
I don't believe Buddhism is a very clear fit for prayer as, contrary to what was written, it doesn't acknowledge a God, nor does it claim Buddha is a higher deity - rather Buddhism is focused on meditation, an attempt to abandon self and desires, not to comunicate or make requests as in prayer. At
627:
Including information on the psychological effects of prayer, and the effects on the praying person's stress and physical and/or mental health may be noteworthy. However no scientific evidence that prayer works, via divine intervention, has ever been produced. Statistical arguments for such things
442:
Well I'm not going to argue with posters before me about specific things. I however feel the over all article is too far into the direction it disusses. So it feels slightly confusing to read through as the slant while there is inconsistant it would be far better with no slant. I don't know how to
194:
We may not have this article say that the Hebrew Bible is Christian, and is separate from Judaiam. There is no historical basis for this position. Historically it is a fact that the Hebrew Bible developed first, from within the Israelite community. The Israelites then became the rabbinic Jews, and
53:
All this says is that the editor doesn't understand a particular isolated verse about prayer. There are dozens of other passages about prayer, in the scriptures of all religions, that could easily appear to be inexplicable on the surface. Do we really want to list and categorize such passages, and
2569:
referenced is the Aristolian view of god. I can see the claims that the paradoxes have been discussed throughout Abrahamic history needed to be cited, but I think at present wholesale removal of the section is robbing the article of useful infomation. We have tags to request the citing of sources
1444:
I am apparently in the minority here: I think this article, more than most, should have extensive external links. I see nothing wrong with pages that have actual texts of actual prayers - Baha'i, Christian, Hindu, whatever. Such things are informational and necessary for anyone actually seeking
406:
Please don't assume I mean offense. My reason for addition of this tag is the article consistently references an undefined "God," which can be construed as POV by those who are unfamiliar with the application of "God" in objective contexts. For those of monotheistic religions who are watching and
3093:
What the article needs more desperately that further cleanups by myself or by you is the scrupulous addition of sources. At the moment, the "experimental evaluation" paragraph cites its data, but that cannot be said about any of the other sections. Jeff3000 has correctly labeled the paragraph on
674:
As a psychiatrist I'm more concerned with how prayer can help others cope with difficulties, relieve physical and psychological tension and stress, and aid overall health in various other ways. I'm not saying it does so by giving people time to reflect, I believe a large part of it is a sense of
155:
Hey, I am a new user. If you come to this page and wonder about its entirely new format, I have added Hinduism, the most representative of Eastern religion, into the mix. Also, I felt that inclusion of the Bible/Christian views on prayer as somehow separate from Christian prayer was unwarranted.
65:
Well, the passage was added to the section containing the Christian understanding of prayer, so Jesus's opinion, supporting "request-style prayer", seems to be relevant. The criticising sentence is probably too much (and evident), so I'm happy with leaving it out. (However, it would certainly be
694:
Vanderbilt Children's Hospital. He recovered extremely quickly from a near fatal disease caused by untreated ecoli poison, and he seemed to be in higher spirits better physical and psychological health due in large part to his immersement in a Super NES videogame called EVO. Before he was given
608:
Would you be happier if it was qualified under folklore? I think within this article should be included scientific views on prayer, it's psychological effects. Without that this is just a PR piece, it is a significant world view that prayer is a self dellusional. It has also been suggested that
2568:
I can see your point, but this wasn't an obscure passage needing interpretation, but a very direct and clear sentence. Namely the verse referenced specifically says that god already knows what you want before you ask, and this is cross referenced with an article on this well-known sermon. Also
1201:
Now you're just being hateful. There was no call to remove the other links. The point is that prayer takes many forms, and to exclude forms you don't recognize shows only that you need to open your mind a bit. Written prayers are important to some people (whether they be Bahai or Christian or
2517:
It is entirely NOR, and should be deleted from the article body in 1 week unless sources are advanced. A lot of this informaton is readily available - when I wrote the "scientific evaluation" section there was no mention of Galton, and the references to the medical literature were chatty and
3262:
I am a Christian and I don't see too much of an Atheistic bias in this article here. It does describe to Christians what it is that Buddhists regard as prayer and vice versa. In that respect, it is quite helpful, and I do believe this is what Knowledge, and all encyclopedias, are all about.
2730:
You have not read it well enough then. There is a long paragraph on the scientific evaluation (which is as close to proof as you can get it). Some studies have suggested a benefit, while others have shown none. I'm sorry it is not called "criticism", which is an unnecessary hyperbole where
195:
only later did Christians develop their addition to the Bible, the New Testament. Your editing of this article rewrites history. Therefore, the article should discuss these aspects of prayer in the same way: As prayer appeared in the Hebrew Bible, then as it changed in the New Testament.
2896:
without changing the whole article's meaning if you understand that. The POV tag is because there is a dispute about the bias-ness of the article. This is more important than if it "doesn't look good" or "may hurt the feelings of other users", because above all this is encyclopedia. —
2583:. As to regard the specific verse that you refer to above, that verse is not a paradox to me; it's very much like a teacher knowing the attitudes of their students in their class. Now that doesn't mean that some people see paradoxes, and that's why things need sources. Regards, --
752:
them), so I have no grounds to suggest that people should stop thinking this way. However, I think it's fair to acknowledge that some religious beliefs are superstitious and, as such, are only of use to the person holding the belief and do not have any external effect on reality.
1033:
Please show me which one of the accepted uses does your link fit under. In fact, your link does not provide any additional information regarding the act of prayer. And regarding signing, you can easily check the history, to see who edited the page, and I missed one tilde. --
2373:
There have been no studies, to our knowledge, on the application of intercessory prayer {IP] to the treatment of infertility. Therefore, we carried out a prospective, randomized, double-blind study in which the efficacy of IP was assessed in patients undergoing treatment for
661:
Perhaps quality time was the wrong wording. Prayer time being a period for contemplation, the modern rituals of prayer, could provide time for contemplation, and that a society which maintains the contemplative periods does find benefits, explained through purely rational
66:
interesting and relevant to learn how Christian authorities resolve the problem). The claim that this quote is isolated does not seem well grounded: it appears in a paragraph which describes how Jesus punished a bush for not carrying fruit by praying for its destruction.
2476:
The "paradoxes" section does not seem to be encyclopedic in content or style. Rather, just a list of questions that seem to be asked in a first person style. Unless this is dramatically improved in content and presentation, I'm leaning towards deletion. Thoughts?
3119:. And I also agree that this is getting into a big fuss. I just wanted to do my revisions (and I did them), and it seems that we're both happy with them (and no others have objected), so can we please stop all this so we can both get to our own editting please?
1286:
Danny, the problem that I have with your page as a link is that it's just a list of names that can be gotten in any number of places, with a directive to pray for these people. I don't see that it adds much in the way of information to the CONCEPT of prayer.
528:
There is no scientific evidence that prayer works. They only people to claim that have been a few US religious nutters, who wanted it to work, it has never been reproduced by independent researchers. As a doctor you should be ashamed of yourself pedling such
1258:
I think part of the problem is the article itself, which is really not a very good one, although I'm not sure how to improve it. It's a huge subject, and almost impossible to include everything that should be in a even a single encyclopedia article.
345:
P values are an indication of statistical significance. The smaller the better, but p<0.05 is considered significant in most studies. I will take it out of the article, because it just confuses and sounds like Byrd found something really shocking
318:
There are also many studies of prayer that suggest that remote intercessory prayer is ineffective and practically useless in enhancing the health of another person. I consider this entire entry POV without a section on the medical effects of prayer.
2543:
I've double checked, and the section cross references with several other articles and refers to known and accepted ideas. I will be re-instating the paradoxes section in 7 days time unless you are able to demonstrate that these sources are invalid
129:, for example, would necessarily cast the debate in quite different terms; and I am wholly ignorant of whether it's been controversial other than in the USA and France, or under what terms the debate might be cast in those places. Some notice of
2533:
The paradoxes did cite sources, including the bible, demonstrating how these ideas had been discussed by thinkers. Ummm, other than tentatively suggesting you get your eyes checked I don't know what to say, The sources were there quite clearly.
3252:
The article is quite obviously written by people who do not believe in prayer and thus presumably do not pray. Prayer is presented as a kind of quaint delusion being observed by someone in a white coat with a clipboard. Why the atheistic bias?
3114:
Yes, I agree that it describes how particular groups pray because they believe in it, but it (before my revisions) hardly mentions that it's what they believe, thus making it as uncontrovercial and truthful as text from another article such as
2293:
I would also point out that the statement: "In contrast with Western religion, Eastern religion for the most part discards worship and places devotional emphasis on the practice of meditation alongside scriptural study." is entirely incorrect.
3053:
I've looked over the article and I don't see the evidence that it "supports the view that prayer works" - I see it discussing prayer in a general sense. Can you point out exactly what your pointing to? I want to try to understand your point.
2838:
I have nothing to do with IsaacEllis!!! But anyways, I read the evaluation and it seems as though it's quite 1 to 1 (if not more for prayer) whilst the rest of the article is quite pro-prayer, so again, I'd like to say it reads quite POV. —
2608:
What would you cite to prove that some of the scientific studies posted seem to misunderstand the concept of prayer? I think this is a bit of problem of perspective here. Anyway, here's a bit from C.S. Lewis that seemed somewhat appropriate:
1334:
There are already too many spam links in the External Links section. I think an article section is a good idea. Then any interested readers can just Google for online prayer sites instead of being herded to one or another by the links.
3242:
I took a quick look at the reason why this article failed the GA nomination last year, and I fixed one of the problems, the other ones having been fixed prior to my involvement. So, what do you guys think? Should we go at it again?
2252:
I think what is meant here is that prayer sometimes is a form of superstition, or that some superstitions have to do with prayer, or that people interested in reading about superstitions might be interested in reading about prayer.
2364:
in a collage textbook book, hence, James M. Henslin's "Essentials of Sociology: A Down to Earth Approach." Looking at this Knowledge entry, it seems as if it should be mentioned in the "Experimental Evaluation of Prayer" section:
2486:
Umm... wouldn't it make more sense to "lean" toward changing how they are presented? Deletion seems inappropriate to me since they add an interesting slant to the article and demonstrate views on prayer other than the devotional
210:
as not found in the Hebrew language Bible based on the much later Masoretic texts; these prayers and versions of prayers were retained by the Church but rejected by the Jews, along with the other differences between those texts.
2418:
I was just researching this article, and it came up that people highly accused this article of being a fraud, especially when one author ended up to be only an editor (thus losing his reputation and gaining the 2004 Scientist's
3122:
Thanks for teaching me not to start with a POV tag, and I honestly didn't know what a community ban or Tojo was before this so I've gained alot, but I'm tired of this biccer, so I'm willing to stop if you are. Thanks again. —
2256:
It's understandable that some folks will be offended by that categorization: people who pray do not want prayer to be called superstitious. However, I think we're better off if we make it clear that categorization doesn't mean
1622:
for all different religions. I removed the external prayer list links and made that point in my Edit Summary, but Spicynugget put them back without any explanation, aside from a vague "please respect the links" on my talk
1374:
Do you really think that there are too many spam links? There are a total of 4 links for a huge subject of major interest to every religion on earth. And I really don't see how any of the four can reasonably called spam.
861:
Should prayer beads and the rosary get a mention here? they do have a main article of their own but to skip them completely seems to be overlooking a prayer ritual practiced by many hundreds of people from multiple faiths
77:
Ok, I'm happy to leave it in as it is now; the verse itself is relevant, and agree it doesn't seem to be taken out of context or anything of that sort. I'll keep my out for further commentary by Christian authorities...
1384:
Perhaps. I may have spoken too soon. Someone is always adding spam links to the section, and I hadn't checked what the current list looks like. A separate section may be useful for curbing the spam problem, though.
893:
There are however prayer traditions within Buddhism and many schools of Buddhism, whilst not recognising a creator deity do have a concept of a higher power. For example in the Order of Buddhist Contemplatives (see
1218:
and edit the article accordingly. But stop pushing your external link. I totally agree with Rich Farmbrough that the removed links are similarly unnecessary and do not broaden the scope of the article in any form.
736:"The superstitious individual erroneously believes that the future, or the outcome of certain events can be caused or influenced by certain specified behaviors, despite the lack of a causal relationship in reality"
2275:
That subheading should definitley be changed, probably to monotheistic religions. Especially erroneous is the assertion is that Judaism is a Western religion. It is no more a Western religion than Islam.--
310:) appear to be missing? Is it for some reason discredited, was it simply unknown to the authors, or is it somehow considered trivial? I intend to add a reference to the study if no objections are posted.
328:
for p-value and still have no better idea how to interpret this. Did it mean that it was very effective, marginally effective, or so barely effective that it was almost indistinguashable from not praying?
544:
Also be advised that the 3RR rule also applies to you and that you introduction of it here when it is inappropriate is nothing more or less than an attempt at bullying. Never communicate with me again.--
773:," while treating those beliefs as nothing but childish fantasies and the offshoots of evolutionary adaptions? You ought to at least substantiate your assertions before adopting such an arrogant tone.
2675:
It is mentioned in the text that the Spanish translation of "to pray" is "rezar". That certainly is the case among Catholics, but among Spanish-speaking Christians, the verb "orar" is used instead.
934:
This is not a common practice, except in parts of the USA, and that only recently, as far as I can tell. I was raised Roman Catholic, and it was not a common practice at all while I was growing up.
3032:
Most of it is fine. Why did you remove referenced content from the "experimental" section? And why did you reintroduce a speculative paragraph that had been placed in comment tags for many months?
1149:
says it all really. Danny has been adding the pages he's worked on to WP. Sorry Danny, that blanket approach won't wash (mixed metaphors?)... If your pages are relevant let someone else add them.
3153:
The article should discuss neutrally what has been said about the act of prayer by external observers, e.g. systematic/philosophical approaches, statistical findings (how many people pray daily?)
160:
pages suffers from a similarly unbalanced viewpoint that unconsciously equates religion with Christianity. Understandably, the writer was not well-versed in other religions and thus, as in this
3168:
This is an important subject and quite hard to write a good encyclopedia article about. What we need foremost is to agree on sources. At the moment, most of the article is a source-free zone.
2196:
A Superstition is the irrational belief that future events are influenced by specific behaviors, without having a causal relationship." -- and recent journal articles have found no efficacy
2616:
to the requests of finite and foolish creatures, of course He will sometimes grant and sometimes refuse them. Invariable "success" in prayer would not prove the Christian doctrine at all.
2000:
Well that isn't enough for semi-protect under general rule-of-thumb, sorry. Its clear this person is only interested in promoting their sites and not in improving Knowledge, though. Pity.
683:
likely to have suicidal tendencies. This holds true for most of my clients as well, and not only the monotheistic ones. I have a coworker and a few neopagan clients from local self styled
419:
I object to the statement "Some of the early Christians whom Mohammed observed, and from whom he adapted elements of his religion, prayed in the posture for which Muslims are now famous."
687:
sects that pray to various Graeco-Roman gods and seem to have the same overall health benefits associated with prayer (reduced stress, an increased ability to cope with tragedy, ect).
464:
should be added to this page. The term "superstition" is heavily loaded, and applied to this page is probably POV. I oppose its use, and was wondering how other users felt about this.
54:
then add commentaries to document how authorities from each religion explain each confusing passage from their scriptures? I'm not sure this sort of project would benefit the article.
2922:
You are the first person in many months who thinks the article is POV. That does not suddenly make it utterly and completely biased. A real encyclopedia doesn't have POV tags either.
875:
I'm Baptist and I would consider and entry on prayer incomplete without at least a mention of the rosary. I don't use it, but have no problem at all with it's use being noted.
121:
Those controversies perhaps ought to be mentioned here, although from the big perspective they may be somewhat parochial, given that they're only controversies because of the
1008:
The link violated no policy. Your refusal to sign your comment, however, does violate policy. I'll post the link here to see if any others agree with your double standard.
3203:
Otherwise, I agree as long as we keep this neutral. If not sooner (I have midterms to study for), I think that Augest 3rd is fair as it's just a little over two weeks. —
1182:
I think Bahai isrelevant, unless you can find a better site. I've removed LPN and Prayer Software. Sacred space looks doubtful to me, perhaps someone else can review it.
1613:
Those look like spam to me. They are commercial links, not informative, and they are only related to Christianity. I don't think they belong in an encyclopedia article.
730:
page has (presumably) since been edited. Reading the first four paragraphs, it seems to apply very closely to the subject of prayer, particularly the view of prayer as
2062:
Not entirely accurate. WP:V and other policies trump consensus. However, spam is not desirable and consensus is that these links are spam. Get over it, SpicyNugget.
2622:
He actually said something once that was specifically about testing prayer in this way, but I'm nto sure which book that was in and it can be nice to have a link.
480:
This entire article is propoganda, it totally lack critique. Any resonable version of this article would atleast admit that a large number of people regard this as
264:
The article says the Roman Catholic Mass is the oldest liturgy. What are the dates of its origin, and how do they compare with the Divine Liturgy of St. James? Our
784:
I agree with HKT here. The term "superstition", as I suggested above, is too heavily loaded. You may try "metaphysics". At least this does not sound disparaging.
175:
46:
is reported as saying "If you believe, you will receive whatever you ask for in prayer." It is not explained how conflicting requests of believers are resolved.
3090:(and it is legitimate to phrase it this way). In the "experimental evaluation" paragraph, all that actually happens is citing studies that have been performed.
1646:
Those links look like spam to me, since they advertise more than they inform, and I think they ought to be deleted and stay deleted. See also the guidelines at
1325:
I think that the article could use a good number of external links to that and other sites that would sort of cover the idea without an actual written section.
252:
Appropriate, though I hope that the person finds the comfort he or she seeks. I feel bad for the peron, though such a request could not be left on the Article.
560:
I warned you about the 3RR for your protection - violating it means you get blocked for 24h from editing Knowledge, something you surely should wish to avoid.
178:
project, message on your user talk page. I think you get it. Anyone else that understands what Donald means, you also may want to take a look at the project.
248:
While whoever posted this seemed distraught, I removed this request for prayers regarding this person's famlly life as it isn't appropriate for this forum.
2928:
Unfortunately, I have seen too many instances where editors have left POV tags and then didn't make the slightest effort to actually make any improvements.
2346:
This is quite POV, not only in its language with words such as "emanate", but there is no source for it. It should be written in an encyclopedic style. --
2043:, but rather relevant to the article. The fact that Spicynugget does not delete other links proves Spicynugget is not a bot or interested in self promotion.
2868:
If the wording appears biased, then go ahead and make the necessary changes. But the article doesn't need a new "criticism" section. And spare us the tag.
164:
article, focused on what he/she knew. For this reason, we need to balance the equation with more contributors across the wikipaedic (dipthong!) board. ---
145:
be controversial in a country which is heavily Muslim but not entirely so. There are probably other places with an entirely different angle on the debate.
2744:
tag to start a discussion. It utterly defaces the article, and annoys the numerous contributors who have previously worked on the article in good faith.
2386:
CONCLUSION: A statistically significant difference was observed for the effect of IP on the outcome of IVF-ET, though the data should be interpreted as
484:. I have seen christians in the mid west claim that whilst other people prayers are superstition, as christain prayers theirs are not superstition. --
2554:
The verses from the Bible need to be interpreted and that is why secondary sources that give an interpretation are needed. As it was the work was
805:
I changed the title from "Statistical proof for prayer" to "Experimental evaluation of prayer", since it isn't really a topic subject to "proof".
2159:
2308:
I failed this article mainly because of the presence of several lists, but also because there are no references in the top half of the article.
1445:
information on prayer, and I don't think they are on Wikisource. The article as it stands is really not much help as an informational article.
383:
2208:(i) At times, a prayer can be interpreted as a request to infulence future events. For example, praying to be cured, or doing well in an exam.
1059:
Sites that have been used as references in the creation of an article should be linked to in a references section, not in external links. See
1084:
reader of their point of view. If one point of view dominates informed opinion, that should be represented first. (For more information, see
426:
Similarly, Islam is from the same God that gave us Judaism and Christianity. Why shouldn't there be similar aspects in the other religions?
2171:
1724:
2925:
I really do not understand your concerns that your editing will change the meaning. Isn't that exactly what you are trying to achieve?
990:
Whoever keeps removing items without bother to offer an explanation, please show some courtesy and at least a semblance of tolerance.
1618:
Furthermore, I don't think the two external links to lists of prayers are necessary. Under See Also, there is already a wikilink to
429:
After all, if one looks closely at the 3 religions, one will find that all three religions forbid alcohol, promiscuity and others.
122:
1214:
Danny, can you explain why so many editors think you are not being helpful here? If you think the Rosary should be mentioned, then
976:
Just to point out their are no pictures of Christians or Jews Praying in the article but pictures of many other religions praying.
872:
does anyone no the novena that you do during lent on good friday between 12:00 and 3:00 please e-mail it to me cmullins15@cox.net
2593:
It seems like a shame to lose such an insightful part of the article, but I shall defer to your better judgement on the matter.
1085:
389:
1105:
Sites with other meaningful, relevant content that is not suitable for inclusion in an article, such as textbooks or reviews.
2125:
2077:
Not deleting other links doesn't vindicate SpicyNugget of self promotion. The links are not helpful, and shouldn't be there.
2025:
1960:
1707:
1636:
1571:
1531:
1467:
1403:
1353:
890:
least I think the buddhist section needs some very thorough modification by someone who has a deep knowledge on the subject.
609:
practice does have advantages but not releated to religions view of the pratice. Not covering these reduces this article to
82:
just says that Jesus' goal was to increase his disciples' confidence in prayer, but doesn't directly address your question.
400:
when adding information and consider tagging or removing uncited/unciteable information in highly controversial articles.
2955:
Please accept the majority view or argue your case rather than make allegations against anyone who disagrees with you. --
2619:
It would prove something more like magic -- a power in certain human beings to control, or compel, the course of nature.
1422:
They should be removed, and I have done that. 3RR doesn't really apply, because the reverts are not in a single day. --
2865:
IanLee, please ignore IsaacEllis. He is a reincarnation of a long-term abuser of Knowledge who is under a community ban.
2314:
2138:
Thanks that made me think and you're right. I've changed it to say "an active effort" in contract to passive efforts.
3138:
I agree bickering should be abolished. I think we can quickly agree on the following points, and proceed accordingly:
2222:(iii) There are many people who suggest that prayer is a superstition. So, I don't think it's OR. (Sources may be
1592:
We're approaching a 3RR violation situation here with Spicynugget's repeated inclusion of the following two links:
3150:. This needs primary sources. I will provide sources for my area of interest (Judaism) if that is deemed helpful.
1677:
Insert them again and I will block this IP as well. You are using Sprint not AOL, no need to limit block length.
1310:
1187:
1154:
2507:
They are not cited, and seem like original research to me; I'll comment them out until sources are provided. --
494:
The article contains elaborate material that according to some (but by no means all) scientific studies, prayer
1647:
1064:
1053:
Articles about any organization, person, or other entity should link to their official site, if they have one.
1044:
I reproduce the content here, and comments in blue regarding the associated link. It doesn't fit any of them:
1001:
600:
2981:
let's continue to discuss, work out problems, work on the article, and get more perspectives on the matter. --
2167:
306:
Why does the study "Positive therapeutic effects of intercessory prayer in a coronary care unit population" (
1060:
1249:
Just want to point out that the Rosary IS mentioned, and a mention is plenty, since it links to an article.
165:
3098:", and I have now removed it from the article completely (as this has been unchanged for several months).
2375:
2235:
663:
639:
2680:
2433:
2407:
2404:
2163:
914:
2594:
2452:
481:
461:
3254:
1237:
1203:
1173:
1012:
991:
876:
2340:
Prayers emanate through physical postures but also through unseen expressions of the heart and spirit.
2044:
1951:
I hope that the administrators are able to take action to prevent further disruption of this article.
1689:
1668:
1113:
1023:
311:
83:
2697:
2478:
2063:
2001:
1983:
1678:
1546:
1307:
1184:
1151:
753:
1077:, a web site, or some other media, should link to the actual book, musical score, etc. if possible.
614:
599:
should be categorized under "Genocide" ... because scientists developed, after all, an atomic bomb?
578:
545:
530:
485:
457:
2661:
I would be interested to see proposals. Sometimes this article can seem a bit all over the place.
2106:
right now the article is not making that clear in the intro paragraph. Someone have a suggestion?
954:
102:
2053:
Knowledge is about consensus, and the current consensus is that the links are not appropriate. --
1970:
1665:
They dont look like spam to me. If we delete these links we need to delete all the external links
1522:
So what's the consensus on the two external links to lists of prayers (one Catholic, one Baha'i)?
3177:
3103:
3037:
2933:
2873:
2789:
2749:
2650:
2523:
2319:
2309:
2262:
2121:
2021:
1992:
1974:
1956:
1703:
1632:
1567:
1527:
1463:
1396:
1346:
1276:
1224:
1132:
820:
789:
565:
515:
469:
355:
2366:
678:
I've personally taken part (mostly as an observer) in various noninvasive experiments regarding
2399:
the effectiveness of prayer, but it ended up that the women who were prayed for had just about
3226:
3208:
3172:
never going to stand. I wish you luck in finding those sources. Can we agree on a time limit?
3128:
3073:
3011:
2901:
2844:
2720:
2230:
953:
Has anyone else noticed that the so-called paradoxes are in fact not paradoxes but questions?
596:
110:
39:
2211:(ii) The majority view (ie, view of the majority of the scientific community) is that prayer
844:
840:
557:
reputable peer-reviewed publications, suggesting that your label is somewhat short-sighted.
444:
423:
can be seen as a continuation or correction of Judaism. Feel free to look at it in any way.
336:
106:
3199:, but should not assume or sugest that prayer does or does not affect extrenal phenomena...
1692:
1671:
1640:
3264:
3244:
3055:
2982:
2956:
2814:
2764:
2693:
2379:
2284:
I agree there "western" and "eastern" seem pointless and (in this case) inaccurate titles
1651:
1619:
1559:
1555:
1542:
1501:
1455:
1446:
1376:
1326:
1288:
1260:
79:
1562:
already covers it, I will go ahead and remove them, with an Edit Summary directing here.
1458:
for the Wikisource of prayer text. It's listed in the See Also section of this article.
917:
2781:
2662:
2636:
2570:
2545:
2535:
2498:
2488:
2295:
2285:
2276:
1089:
963:
899:
863:
265:
130:
67:
3173:
3099:
3095:
3033:
2929:
2869:
2785:
2745:
2646:
2584:
2580:
2559:
2519:
2508:
2420:
2347:
2199:
2139:
2117:
2107:
2054:
2017:
1952:
1699:
1628:
1563:
1523:
1459:
1423:
1389:
1339:
1272:
1220:
1128:
1117:
1035:
816:
785:
561:
511:
507:
465:
351:
114:
1558:
is the only one here who defended keeping them in, and he has since recognized that
1022:
inspired to collect the same data for their own country. I'll add the link back in.
3204:
3124:
3069:
3007:
2897:
2840:
2738:
2716:
2555:
2462:
2091:
1215:
935:
895:
727:
706:
696:
650:
629:
408:
394:
Please read this talk page and discuss substantial changes here before making them.
320:
307:
291:
290:
The currently most-common Roman Catholic Mass is very new, less than a century old.
253:
1688:
Actually, we need to include another link as well: www.liveprayer.com Live Prayer
3222:
2387:
2180:
2078:
1655:
1301:
Is this worth a section? The Church of England, for example, has a prayer feed
977:
926:
848:
436:
397:
332:
329:
282:
269:
230:
212:
179:
146:
134:
87:
55:
17:
3068:
reintrduced the "speculative" paragrapgh to provide a scientific standpoint. —
2623:
1740:- The largest prayer system on the net, in minutes add live prayer to your site
1602:- The largest prayer system on the net, in minutes add live prayer to your site
836:
806:
742:
acknowledging the superstitious nature of prayer makes Knowledge inconsistent.
610:
375:
207:
2715:
who is, write a critism section offering the scientific POV. That's all. —
2635:
is somewhat of a major change but I'm' confident they will be satisfactory.
2367:
Does Prayer Influence the Success of in Vitro Fertilization–Embryo Transfer?
1116:
was just created and this the only contribution is to put back the link. --
196:
2679:
None of which strikes me as particularly relevant to English wikipedia...
1302:
3267:
3257:
3247:
3229:
3212:
3182:
3132:
3108:
3077:
3058:
3042:
3015:
2985:
2959:
2938:
2905:
2878:
2848:
2817:
2813:
I am not, and I do not know IanLee. So please accept the majority view. --
2794:
2767:
2754:
2724:
2701:
2683:
2665:
2655:
2639:
2597:
2587:
2573:
2562:
2548:
2538:
2528:
2511:
2501:
2491:
2481:
2465:
2455:
2436:
2350:
2324:
2298:
2288:
2279:
2265:
2202:
2183:
2142:
2129:
2110:
2094:
2081:
2066:
2057:
2047:
2029:
2004:
1995:
1986:
1977:
1964:
1711:
1681:
1658:
1575:
1549:
1535:
1504:
1471:
1449:
1426:
1411:
1379:
1361:
1329:
1291:
1281:
1263:
1240:
1229:
1206:
1176:
1137:
1120:
1038:
1026:
1015:
994:
980:
966:
957:
938:
929:
902:
879:
866:
851:
825:
809:
794:
777:
756:
717:
699:
666:
653:
642:
632:
617:
603:
570:
548:
533:
520:
502:
from your category. As for critique, I think the many studies that cite a
498:
in fact have a beneficial effect. I think this is adequate to warrant its
488:
474:
447:
360:
339:
285:
272:
233:
215:
3116:
2447:
Can someone add the word "Prayer" in the International Phonetic Alphabet?
1074:
774:
714:
157:
2194:
Cyde has just added the Superstition category to this page, noting that
2179:
I think you're spot on in what you're saying. Thanks for catching this.
2579:
While tags can be used, anyone can remove anything that is uncited per
898:) we recognise the Cosmic Buddha as a representation of the Uncreated.
3156:
The experimental paragraph needs to state the findings of the studies
2429:
Could someone please research this more so I can find the end result?
1009:
1004:) I will be removing the link once again. -- 19:08, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
692:
125:. An article about the political debates over religion in schools in
3006:
Just guessing you'll not like my revision, so let's talk about it. —
2497:
alarmist reaction to what was essentially a qualm about presentation
2403:
the chance of bearing a child than those who were not prayed for. --
1746:- Get prayer, prayer for others and have it sent to any mobile device
1608:- Get prayer, prayer for others and have it sent to any mobile device
1315:
1192:
1159:
161:
126:
268:
article doesn't cover the older history of the Mass or its origins.
84:
http://www.ccel.org/fathers2/NPNF1-10/npnf1-10-73.htm#P6519_2001116
2626:
Bible, especially, has multiple injunctions against testing God).
174:
Hi Donald, welcome. Good attitude. I've invited you to join the
43:
1731:
to mask his spamming, adding the following two commerical links:
1982:
I'm counting an average of 3 insertions a day, is that correct?
1318:
1195:
1162:
843:. If you would like to see this article improved vote for it on
734:. This is clearly a superstitious belief, under the definition
691:
was 14 years old at the time) who was the subject of a study at
590:
There are skeptics enough to express doubts about the tenets of
1727:
for the repeated edits made by SpicyNugget using additionally '
2041:
respectfully disagree and think that those links are NOT spam
1000:
The type of external links allowed is Knowledge policy (see
506:
of efficacy are enough critique. Please be advised that the
1146:
2360:
I haven't read the exact article yet, but I reda a report
109:? Any comments or ideas? I just completed the new article
3160:
criticising their methodology (unless there is criticism
638:
Prayer as a social construct to set aside quality time?--
1942:
1936:
1930:
1924:
1918:
1912:
1906:
1900:
1894:
1888:
1882:
1876:
1870:
1864:
1858:
1852:
1846:
1840:
1834:
1828:
1822:
1816:
1810:
1804:
1798:
1792:
1786:
1780:
1774:
1768:
1762:
1743:
1605:
1737:
1599:
595:
to do so. Or do you hold that an article on, say, the
2240:
I don't think we should take the presence of article
2016:
Thank you, admins, for semi-protecting the article!
2229:So, I agree with adding the cat to the article.
1719:Request for investigation for repeated spam links
1648:Knowledge:External_links#Links_to_normally_avoid
308:http://home.wxs.nl/~faase009/D960916-prayer.html
2215:have theraphutic or a wish fulfilling effect.(
1654:is the obvious place to put a list of prayers.
771:don't wish to insult anyone's religious beliefs
2334:I have reverted again, and the text includes:
176:Knowledge:WikiProject Countering systemic bias
2780:That would have been helpful if you were not
649:of prayer seem rather benign and beneficial.
8:
2355:
1073:An article about a book, a musical score, a
711:A superstition is a provably wrong belief...
2395:In other words, they thought that it would
1088:– in particular, Knowledge's guidelines on
767:"affect the very fabric of reality itself"
732:"affect the very fabric of reality itself"
370:
206:There is also the matter of prayer in the
3088:because they DO believe that prayer works
2645:Please discuss major changes here first.
2090:The links are spam and should be deleted.
1099:inappropriate for the Knowledge article.
962:Surely the questions point to paradoxes?
2261:... it means that X has to do with Y. --
1303:http://daily.commonworship.com/daily.cgi
432:I move the editor strike that sentence.
133:probably ought to be taken as well. --
2426:Unfortunately, I can't find this reply.
2356:Why wasn't this article mentioned here?
908:How common is phrase "In Jesus' Name"??
113:(contributions would be appreciated).
2461:For me (non-rhotic British) - /pɹɛː/
1756:individual instances of this vandal:
7:
2116:Perhaps you might say, "proactive?"
986:Removal of items without explination
801:Title of "effects of prayer" section
3191:The article should present clearly
3142:The article should present clearly
2763:I completely agree with Ian Lee. --
2734:Please do me a favour: NEVER use a
2612:Prayer Is A Request by C. S. Lewis
2451:The "er" can confuse some people.--
1127:links policy as reproduced above.
24:
3086:particular religious groups pray
2151:Philosophical paradoxes of prayer
123:constitution of the United States
1297:Prayer (and|on the) the internet
738:. I'd go so far as to say that
374:
2472:Paradoxes section Encyclopedic?
1086:Knowledge:Neutral point of view
885:Editing or removal of Buddhism.
3230:03:00, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
3094:philosophical contradictions "
2671:"To pray" as a verb in Spanish
2304:Failed Good Article Nomination
2299:07:16, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
2289:07:13, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
1583:
1541:IMHO it is redundant with the
826:17:37, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
810:03:49, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
1:
2702:22:25, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
2529:21:31, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
2512:06:28, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
2502:04:57, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
2466:14:01, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
2456:03:34, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
2437:00:47, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
2408:16:40, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
2325:20:44, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
2280:20:56, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
2266:06:32, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
1588:There are two problems here:
852:15:33, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
718:05:56, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
700:01:30, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
667:00:59, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
654:00:39, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
643:00:39, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
633:20:29, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
618:20:23, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
604:13:47, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
571:11:25, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
549:11:20, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
534:11:20, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
521:11:16, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
489:11:12, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
475:11:07, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
448:04:13, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
281:as the Roman Catholic Church.
189:Hebrew Bible and Christianity
3268:17:52, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
3258:17:44, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
3248:22:29, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
2492:01:12, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
2482:23:02, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
2351:16:47, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
1584:Spicynugget's repeated edits
867:07:12, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
795:23:32, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
778:21:48, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
757:15:31, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
1939:by 68.30.202.138 on June 22
1933:by 68.30.202.138 on June 22
1927:by 68.30.202.138 on June 22
1921:by 68.30.202.138 on June 22
1915:by 68.30.202.138 on June 22
907:
97:Prayer in public and school
3283:
2692:Catholics ARE Christians.
2588:02:25, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
2574:01:42, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
2203:19:17, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
1873:by 68.30.139.68 on June 17
1867:by 68.30.139.68 on June 17
1861:by 68.30.139.68 on June 17
1855:by 68.30.139.68 on June 17
1789:by 68.30.128.236 on May 25
958:05:04, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
918:16:27, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
839:is currently a nominee on
396:Make sure you supply full
229:Israel in the 1st century.
3213:22:08, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
3183:12:35, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
3133:01:15, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
3109:05:33, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
3078:02:07, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
3059:01:07, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
3043:22:11, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
3016:21:24, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
2986:01:07, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
2960:21:19, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
2939:20:48, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
2906:20:42, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
2879:20:27, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
2849:19:27, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
2818:19:30, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
2795:19:20, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
2768:19:17, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
2755:19:15, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
2731:"evaluation" does nicely.
2725:19:09, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
2684:01:24, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
2656:07:06, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
2640:21:22, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
2598:18:16, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
2563:15:30, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
2549:14:53, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
2539:14:49, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
2371:To quote the three MDs, "
2184:16:52, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
2143:18:22, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
2130:18:09, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
2111:17:02, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
2082:17:30, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
2067:12:58, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
2058:03:07, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
2048:03:06, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
2030:19:07, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
2005:16:41, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
1996:16:28, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
1987:15:33, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
1978:12:27, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
1965:12:23, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
1945:by 68.30.30.12 on June 22
1909:by 68.170.31.9 on June 21
1885:by 70.8.73.106 on June 18
1879:by 70.8.124.84 on June 17
1849:by SpicyNugget on June 16
1843:by 68.170.31.9 on June 15
1837:by SpicyNugget on June 13
1831:by 68.170.31.9 on June 13
1825:by 68.170.31.9 on June 11
1765:by 67.21.19.176 on May 17
1725:request for investigation
1712:18:55, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
1693:18:53, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
1682:18:48, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
1672:18:46, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
1659:16:24, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
1641:12:04, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
1576:13:33, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
1550:13:12, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
1536:15:45, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
1505:22:02, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
1472:14:31, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
1450:14:05, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
1427:12:22, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
939:15:27, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
439:08:29, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC)
411:05:05, 17 Oct 2004 (UTC)
361:23:03, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
340:08:32, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
314:16:56, 24 Oct 2004 (UTC)
302:Medical Effects of Prayer
2666:22:57, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
2095:03:06, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
1903:by 70.8.87.34 on June 19
1897:by 70.8.87.34 on June 19
1891:by 70.8.87.34 on June 19
1819:by SpicyNugget on June 9
1813:by SpicyNugget on June 9
1807:by 68.170.31.9 on June 9
1801:by SpicyNugget on June 8
1795:by 68.170.31.9 on May 26
1783:by SpicyNugget on May 25
1777:by 68.170.31.9 on May 25
1771:by SpicyNugget on May 24
1729:8 different IP addresses
1500:I stand corrected. Ok.
1412:15:54, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
1380:15:17, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
1362:15:07, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
1330:15:05, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
1292:02:40, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
1282:02:15, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
1264:02:35, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
1241:01:58, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
1230:00:27, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
1207:00:11, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
1177:21:55, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
1147:http://dannycarlton.net/
1138:20:46, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
1121:20:18, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
1065:Knowledge:Citing sources
1048:What should be linked to
1039:20:13, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
1027:20:12, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
1016:19:47, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
1002:Knowledge:External links
995:18:46, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
981:02:15, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
930:02:07, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
880:18:44, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
323:20:51, 20 Sep 2004 (UTC)
286:02:04, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
234:02:13, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
199:15:22, Jan 9, 2004 (UTC)
182:02:03, 2004 Oct 30 (UTC)
117:16:23 11 Jun 2003 (UTC)
2248:to be a statement that
1627:What do you all think?
1061:Knowledge:Verifiability
967:17:47, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
903:17:45, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
273:16:42, 5 May 2004 (UTC)
216:16:42, 5 May 2004 (UTC)
137:00:06 12 Jun 2003 (UTC)
90:16:44 10 Jun 2003 (UTC)
3164:of their methodology).
2432:See Also: --
2376:in Vitro Fertilization
925:Catholics also do this
705:To quote the intro to
70:18:19 9 Jun 2003 (UTC)
58:13:18 9 Jun 2003 (UTC)
30:Removal: Matthew 21:22
2162:comment was added by
2101:Prayer and Not Prayer
482:category:superstition
462:Category:Superstition
1991:Seems about right.--
765:A view of prayer as
3238:GA nomination again
1738:Live Prayer Network
1600:Live Prayer Network
601:BrandonYusufToropov
2362:about this article
1112:Also to note that
815:Quite reasonable.
388:that may be under
3180:
3106:
3096:original research
3040:
2936:
2876:
2792:
2752:
2653:
2556:original research
2526:
2250:X is a kind of Y.
2219:] and many more).
2175:
1698:STOP THE SPAM!!!
1410:
1360:
1279:
1227:
1135:
1010:Pray for America!
972:Christain Picture
832:Improvement Drive
823:
792:
664:WholemealBaphomet
640:WholemealBaphomet
597:scientific method
568:
518:
510:is in operation.
508:three-revert rule
472:
460:has decided that
404:
403:
358:
111:moment of silence
3274:
3195:people pray and
3178:
3146:people pray and
3104:
3038:
2934:
2874:
2790:
2750:
2743:
2737:
2651:
2524:
2322:
2317:
2312:
2271:Western religion
2259:X is a kind of Y
2233:
2157:
2035:Spam, CON, and V
1752:I've documented
1723:I have put in a
1409:
1408:
1406:
1401:
1399:
1394:
1392:
1386:
1359:
1358:
1356:
1351:
1349:
1344:
1342:
1336:
1277:
1225:
1133:
1108:
1102:
1095:
1080:
1070:
1056:
821:
790:
566:
516:
470:
378:
371:
356:
166:Donaldsutherland
107:prayer in school
3282:
3281:
3277:
3276:
3275:
3273:
3272:
3271:
3240:
2741:
2735:
2712:
2673:
2632:
2630:general rewrite
2606:
2604:Citation Needed
2474:
2449:
2380:Embryo transfer
2358:
2332:
2320:
2315:
2310:
2306:
2273:
2231:
2192:
2158:—The preceding
2153:
2103:
2064:KillerChihuahua
2037:
2002:KillerChihuahua
1984:KillerChihuahua
1744:Prayer Software
1721:
1679:KillerChihuahua
1652:List of prayers
1620:List of prayers
1606:Prayer Software
1586:
1560:List of Prayers
1547:KillerChihuahua
1543:List of prayers
1456:List of prayers
1404:
1402:
1397:
1395:
1390:
1388:
1387:
1354:
1352:
1347:
1345:
1340:
1338:
1337:
1299:
1106:
1100:
1093:
1078:
1068:
1054:
1050:
988:
974:
951:
910:
887:
859:
834:
803:
455:
369:
304:
262:
246:
244:Soldier in Iraq
191:
99:
80:John Chrysostom
32:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
3280:
3278:
3239:
3236:
3235:
3234:
3233:
3232:
3201:
3200:
3166:
3165:
3154:
3151:
3136:
3135:
3120:
3083:
3082:
3081:
3080:
3062:
3061:
3050:
3049:
3048:
3047:
3046:
3045:
3025:
3024:
3023:
3022:
3021:
3020:
3019:
3018:
2997:
2996:
2995:
2994:
2993:
2992:
2991:
2990:
2989:
2988:
2969:
2968:
2967:
2966:
2965:
2964:
2963:
2962:
2946:
2945:
2944:
2943:
2942:
2941:
2926:
2923:
2915:
2914:
2913:
2912:
2911:
2910:
2909:
2908:
2886:
2885:
2884:
2883:
2882:
2881:
2866:
2858:
2857:
2856:
2855:
2854:
2853:
2852:
2851:
2829:
2828:
2827:
2826:
2825:
2824:
2823:
2822:
2821:
2820:
2802:
2801:
2800:
2799:
2798:
2797:
2773:
2772:
2771:
2770:
2758:
2757:
2732:
2711:
2708:
2707:
2706:
2705:
2704:
2687:
2686:
2681:68.117.102.237
2672:
2669:
2659:
2658:
2631:
2628:
2605:
2602:
2591:
2590:
2566:
2565:
2515:
2514:
2473:
2470:
2469:
2468:
2448:
2445:
2444:
2443:
2442:
2441:
2440:
2439:
2434:208.127.64.161
2427:
2424:
2412:
2405:208.127.64.127
2357:
2354:
2344:
2343:
2331:
2328:
2305:
2302:
2272:
2269:
2238:
2237:
2227:
2220:
2209:
2191:
2188:
2187:
2186:
2164:141.155.129.48
2152:
2149:
2148:
2147:
2146:
2145:
2133:
2132:
2102:
2099:
2098:
2097:
2087:
2086:
2085:
2084:
2072:
2071:
2070:
2069:
2036:
2033:
2014:
2013:
2012:
2011:
2010:
2009:
2008:
2007:
1949:
1948:
1947:
1946:
1940:
1934:
1928:
1922:
1916:
1910:
1904:
1898:
1892:
1886:
1880:
1874:
1868:
1862:
1856:
1850:
1844:
1838:
1832:
1826:
1820:
1814:
1808:
1802:
1796:
1790:
1784:
1778:
1772:
1766:
1750:
1749:
1748:
1747:
1741:
1720:
1717:
1716:
1715:
1687:
1685:
1684:
1662:
1661:
1625:
1624:
1615:
1614:
1611:
1610:
1609:
1603:
1594:
1593:
1585:
1582:
1581:
1580:
1579:
1578:
1520:
1519:
1518:
1517:
1516:
1515:
1514:
1513:
1512:
1511:
1510:
1509:
1508:
1507:
1485:
1484:
1483:
1482:
1481:
1480:
1479:
1478:
1477:
1476:
1475:
1474:
1432:
1430:
1429:
1420:
1419:
1418:
1417:
1416:
1415:
1414:
1367:
1366:
1365:
1364:
1298:
1295:
1269:
1268:
1267:
1266:
1253:
1252:
1251:
1250:
1244:
1243:
1212:
1211:
1210:
1209:
1169:
1168:
1167:
1166:
1141:
1140:
1110:
1109:
1107:not applicable
1103:
1101:not applicable
1096:
1094:not applicable
1081:
1079:not applicable
1071:
1069:not applicable
1057:
1055:not applicable
1049:
1046:
1042:
1041:
1030:
1029:
1006:
1005:
987:
984:
973:
970:
955:LearningKnight
950:
947:
946:
945:
944:
943:
942:
941:
915:145.254.129.18
909:
906:
886:
883:
858:
855:
833:
830:
829:
828:
802:
799:
798:
797:
781:
780:
762:
761:
760:
759:
746:
745:
744:
743:
721:
720:
672:
671:
670:
669:
646:
645:
625:
624:
623:
622:
621:
620:
585:
584:
583:
582:
554:
553:
552:
551:
539:
538:
537:
536:
492:
491:
458:User:Baphomet.
454:
451:
415:Islamic Prayer
402:
401:
395:
393:
379:
368:
365:
364:
363:
325:
324:
303:
300:
299:
298:
297:
296:
295:
294:
266:Mass (liturgy)
261:
260:Oldest Liturgy
258:
257:
256:
245:
242:
241:
240:
239:
238:
237:
236:
221:
220:
219:
218:
201:
200:
190:
187:
186:
185:
184:
183:
169:
168:
152:
151:
150:
149:
139:
138:
131:civil religion
98:
95:
94:
93:
92:
91:
72:
71:
62:
61:
60:
59:
48:
47:
31:
28:
26:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3279:
3270:
3269:
3266:
3260:
3259:
3256:
3250:
3249:
3246:
3237:
3231:
3228:
3224:
3219:
3218:
3217:
3216:
3215:
3214:
3210:
3206:
3198:
3194:
3190:
3189:
3188:
3185:
3184:
3181:
3175:
3169:
3163:
3159:
3155:
3152:
3149:
3145:
3141:
3140:
3139:
3134:
3130:
3126:
3121:
3118:
3113:
3112:
3111:
3110:
3107:
3101:
3097:
3091:
3089:
3079:
3075:
3071:
3066:
3065:
3064:
3063:
3060:
3057:
3052:
3051:
3044:
3041:
3035:
3031:
3030:
3029:
3028:
3027:
3026:
3017:
3013:
3009:
3005:
3004:
3003:
3002:
3001:
3000:
2999:
2998:
2987:
2984:
2979:
2978:
2977:
2976:
2975:
2974:
2973:
2972:
2971:
2970:
2961:
2958:
2954:
2953:
2952:
2951:
2950:
2949:
2948:
2947:
2940:
2937:
2931:
2927:
2924:
2921:
2920:
2919:
2918:
2917:
2916:
2907:
2903:
2899:
2894:
2893:
2892:
2891:
2890:
2889:
2888:
2887:
2880:
2877:
2871:
2867:
2864:
2863:
2862:
2861:
2860:
2859:
2850:
2846:
2842:
2837:
2836:
2835:
2834:
2833:
2832:
2831:
2830:
2819:
2816:
2812:
2811:
2810:
2809:
2808:
2807:
2806:
2805:
2804:
2803:
2796:
2793:
2787:
2783:
2779:
2778:
2777:
2776:
2775:
2774:
2769:
2766:
2762:
2761:
2760:
2759:
2756:
2753:
2747:
2740:
2733:
2729:
2728:
2727:
2726:
2722:
2718:
2709:
2703:
2699:
2695:
2691:
2690:
2689:
2688:
2685:
2682:
2678:
2677:
2676:
2670:
2668:
2667:
2664:
2657:
2654:
2648:
2644:
2643:
2642:
2641:
2638:
2629:
2627:
2624:
2620:
2617:
2613:
2610:
2603:
2601:
2599:
2596:
2595:86.151.142.12
2589:
2586:
2582:
2578:
2577:
2576:
2575:
2572:
2564:
2561:
2557:
2553:
2552:
2551:
2550:
2547:
2541:
2540:
2537:
2531:
2530:
2527:
2521:
2513:
2510:
2506:
2505:
2504:
2503:
2500:
2494:
2493:
2490:
2484:
2483:
2480:
2471:
2467:
2464:
2460:
2459:
2458:
2457:
2454:
2453:Greasysteve13
2446:
2438:
2435:
2431:
2430:
2428:
2425:
2422:
2421:Pigasus Award
2417:
2416:
2415:
2414:
2413:
2410:
2409:
2406:
2402:
2398:
2393:
2391:
2389:
2383:
2381:
2377:
2369:
2368:
2363:
2353:
2352:
2349:
2341:
2337:
2336:
2335:
2329:
2327:
2326:
2323:
2318:
2313:
2303:
2301:
2300:
2297:
2291:
2290:
2287:
2282:
2281:
2278:
2270:
2268:
2267:
2264:
2260:
2254:
2251:
2247:
2243:
2236:
2234:
2228:
2225:
2223:
2221:
2218:
2216:
2214:
2210:
2207:
2206:
2205:
2204:
2201:
2197:
2189:
2185:
2182:
2178:
2177:
2176:
2173:
2169:
2165:
2161:
2150:
2144:
2141:
2137:
2136:
2135:
2134:
2131:
2127:
2123:
2119:
2115:
2114:
2113:
2112:
2109:
2100:
2096:
2093:
2089:
2088:
2083:
2080:
2076:
2075:
2074:
2073:
2068:
2065:
2061:
2060:
2059:
2056:
2052:
2051:
2050:
2049:
2046:
2042:
2034:
2032:
2031:
2027:
2023:
2019:
2006:
2003:
1999:
1998:
1997:
1994:
1993:Birdmessenger
1990:
1989:
1988:
1985:
1981:
1980:
1979:
1976:
1975:Birdmessenger
1972:
1971:They're on it
1969:
1968:
1967:
1966:
1962:
1958:
1954:
1944:
1941:
1938:
1935:
1932:
1929:
1926:
1923:
1920:
1917:
1914:
1911:
1908:
1905:
1902:
1899:
1896:
1893:
1890:
1887:
1884:
1881:
1878:
1875:
1872:
1869:
1866:
1863:
1860:
1857:
1854:
1851:
1848:
1845:
1842:
1839:
1836:
1833:
1830:
1827:
1824:
1821:
1818:
1815:
1812:
1809:
1806:
1803:
1800:
1797:
1794:
1791:
1788:
1785:
1782:
1779:
1776:
1773:
1770:
1767:
1764:
1761:
1760:
1759:
1758:
1757:
1755:
1745:
1742:
1739:
1736:
1735:
1734:
1733:
1732:
1730:
1726:
1718:
1713:
1709:
1705:
1701:
1697:
1696:
1695:
1694:
1691:
1683:
1680:
1676:
1675:
1674:
1673:
1670:
1666:
1660:
1657:
1653:
1649:
1645:
1644:
1643:
1642:
1638:
1634:
1630:
1621:
1617:
1616:
1612:
1607:
1604:
1601:
1598:
1597:
1596:
1595:
1591:
1590:
1589:
1577:
1573:
1569:
1565:
1561:
1557:
1553:
1552:
1551:
1548:
1544:
1540:
1539:
1538:
1537:
1533:
1529:
1525:
1506:
1503:
1499:
1498:
1497:
1496:
1495:
1494:
1493:
1492:
1491:
1490:
1489:
1488:
1487:
1486:
1473:
1469:
1465:
1461:
1457:
1453:
1452:
1451:
1448:
1443:
1442:
1441:
1440:
1439:
1438:
1437:
1436:
1435:
1434:
1433:
1428:
1425:
1421:
1413:
1407:
1400:
1393:
1383:
1382:
1381:
1378:
1373:
1372:
1371:
1370:
1369:
1368:
1363:
1357:
1350:
1343:
1333:
1332:
1331:
1328:
1324:
1323:
1322:
1320:
1317:
1313:
1312:
1309:
1304:
1296:
1294:
1293:
1290:
1284:
1283:
1280:
1274:
1265:
1262:
1257:
1256:
1255:
1254:
1248:
1247:
1246:
1245:
1242:
1239:
1234:
1233:
1232:
1231:
1228:
1222:
1217:
1208:
1205:
1200:
1199:
1197:
1194:
1190:
1189:
1186:
1181:
1180:
1179:
1178:
1175:
1164:
1161:
1157:
1156:
1153:
1148:
1145:
1144:
1143:
1142:
1139:
1136:
1130:
1125:
1124:
1123:
1122:
1119:
1115:
1104:
1097:
1091:
1087:
1082:
1076:
1072:
1066:
1062:
1058:
1052:
1051:
1047:
1045:
1040:
1037:
1032:
1031:
1028:
1025:
1020:
1019:
1018:
1017:
1014:
1011:
1003:
999:
998:
997:
996:
993:
985:
983:
982:
979:
971:
969:
968:
965:
960:
959:
956:
948:
940:
937:
933:
932:
931:
928:
924:
923:
922:
921:
920:
919:
916:
905:
904:
901:
897:
891:
884:
882:
881:
878:
873:
870:
868:
865:
856:
854:
853:
850:
846:
842:
838:
831:
827:
824:
818:
814:
813:
812:
811:
808:
800:
796:
793:
787:
783:
782:
779:
776:
772:
768:
764:
763:
758:
755:
750:
749:
748:
747:
741:
737:
733:
729:
725:
724:
723:
722:
719:
716:
712:
708:
704:
703:
702:
701:
698:
693:
688:
686:
681:
676:
668:
665:
660:
659:
658:
657:
656:
655:
652:
644:
641:
637:
636:
635:
634:
631:
619:
616:
612:
607:
606:
605:
602:
598:
593:
589:
588:
587:
586:
580:
577:
576:
575:
574:
573:
572:
569:
563:
558:
550:
547:
543:
542:
541:
540:
535:
532:
527:
526:
525:
524:
523:
522:
519:
513:
509:
505:
501:
497:
490:
487:
483:
479:
478:
477:
476:
473:
467:
463:
459:
452:
450:
449:
446:
440:
438:
433:
430:
427:
424:
420:
417:
416:
412:
410:
399:
391:
387:
385:
384:controversial
380:
377:
373:
372:
366:
362:
359:
353:
349:
344:
343:
342:
341:
338:
334:
330:
322:
317:
316:
315:
313:
309:
301:
293:
289:
288:
287:
284:
279:
278:
277:
276:
275:
274:
271:
267:
259:
255:
251:
250:
249:
243:
235:
232:
227:
226:
225:
224:
223:
222:
217:
214:
209:
205:
204:
203:
202:
198:
193:
192:
188:
181:
177:
173:
172:
171:
170:
167:
163:
159:
154:
153:
148:
143:
142:
141:
140:
136:
132:
128:
124:
120:
119:
118:
116:
112:
108:
104:
103:public prayer
96:
89:
85:
81:
76:
75:
74:
73:
69:
64:
63:
57:
52:
51:
50:
49:
45:
41:
37:
36:
35:
29:
27:
19:
3261:
3255:212.41.66.85
3251:
3241:
3227:Shirahadasha
3202:
3196:
3192:
3186:
3170:
3167:
3161:
3157:
3147:
3143:
3137:
3092:
3087:
3084:
2713:
2674:
2660:
2633:
2621:
2618:
2614:
2611:
2607:
2600:(Lostsocks)
2592:
2567:
2542:
2532:
2518:incomplete.
2516:
2495:
2485:
2475:
2450:
2411:
2400:
2396:
2394:
2385:
2372:
2370:
2361:
2359:
2345:
2339:
2333:
2307:
2292:
2283:
2274:
2258:
2255:
2249:
2245:
2244:in category
2241:
2239:
2232:Vorpal Blade
2212:
2195:
2193:
2190:Superstition
2154:
2104:
2040:
2038:
2015:
1950:
1753:
1751:
1728:
1722:
1686:
1664:
1663:
1626:
1587:
1521:
1431:
1306:
1300:
1285:
1270:
1238:Dannycarlton
1213:
1204:Dannycarlton
1183:
1174:Dannycarlton
1170:
1150:
1111:
1090:undue weight
1043:
1013:Dannycarlton
1007:
992:Dannycarlton
989:
975:
961:
952:
911:
896:Jiyu_Kennett
892:
888:
877:Dannycarlton
874:
871:
860:
835:
804:
770:
766:
739:
735:
731:
728:Superstition
710:
707:Superstition
689:
684:
680:spirituality
679:
677:
673:
647:
626:
591:
559:
555:
503:
499:
495:
493:
456:
441:
434:
431:
428:
425:
421:
418:
414:
413:
405:
381:
347:
326:
305:
263:
247:
100:
33:
25:
3223:confounding
3187:Amendment:
2388:preliminary
2045:70.8.49.228
1714:(see below)
1690:68.30.30.12
1669:68.30.30.12
1114:JohnEdwards
1024:JohnEdwards
685:hellenistic
445:Shimonnyman
367:Controversy
312:18.242.6.95
18:Talk:Prayer
3265:Blanchardb
3245:Blanchardb
3056:Bachrach44
2983:Bachrach44
2957:IsaacEllis
2815:IsaacEllis
2765:IsaacEllis
2479:Soonercary
1943:Example 31
1937:Example 30
1931:Example 29
1925:Example 28
1919:Example 27
1913:Example 26
1907:Example 25
1901:Example 24
1895:Example 23
1889:Example 22
1883:Example 21
1877:Example 20
1871:Example 19
1865:Example 18
1859:Example 17
1853:Example 16
1847:Example 15
1841:Example 14
1835:Example 13
1829:Example 12
1823:Example 11
1817:Example 10
1311:Farmbrough
1188:Farmbrough
1155:Farmbrough
949:Paradoxes?
869:lostsocks
837:Meditation
754:Rob Knight
611:propaganda
529:rubbish.--
382:This is a
208:Septuagint
101:How about
3162:by others
2663:Lostsocks
2637:Randy6767
2571:Lostsocks
2546:Lostsocks
2536:Lostsocks
2499:Lostsocks
2489:Lostsocks
2296:Lostsocks
2286:Lostsocks
2277:Esprit15d
1811:Example 9
1805:Example 8
1799:Example 7
1793:Example 6
1787:Example 5
1781:Example 4
1775:Example 3
1769:Example 2
1763:Example 1
964:Lostsocks
900:Lostsocks
864:Lostsocks
845:WP:IDRIVE
841:WP:IDRIVE
615:Baphomet.
579:Baphomet.
546:Baphomet.
531:Baphomet.
500:exclusion
486:Baphomet.
398:citations
68:AxelBoldt
34:Removed:
3117:Computer
2585:Jeff3000
2560:Jeff3000
2509:Jeff3000
2397:disprove
2348:Jeff3000
2213:does not
2200:Jeff3000
2172:contribs
2160:unsigned
2140:Wjhonson
2118:MamaGeek
2108:Wjhonson
2055:Jeff3000
2018:MamaGeek
1953:MamaGeek
1700:MamaGeek
1629:MamaGeek
1564:MamaGeek
1524:MamaGeek
1460:MamaGeek
1424:Jeff3000
1391:MamaGeek
1341:MamaGeek
1118:Jeff3000
1075:webcomic
1036:Jeff3000
857:Rosary??
662:means?--
453:Category
348:quod non
158:religion
115:Usedbook
3205:Ian Lee
3158:without
3125:Ian Lee
3070:Ian Lee
3008:Ian Lee
2898:Ian Lee
2841:Ian Lee
2782:WP:TOJO
2717:Ian Lee
2463:Man vyi
2384:" ... "
2330:Reverts
2311:Some P.
2226:], etc)
2126:Contrib
2092:Dogface
2026:Contrib
1961:Contrib
1708:Contrib
1637:Contrib
1572:Contrib
1532:Contrib
1468:Contrib
1405:CONTRIB
1355:CONTRIB
1321:(UTC).
1316:7 June
1271:DNFTT.
1216:be bold
1198:(UTC).
1193:6 June
1160:6 June
936:Dogface
697:LucaviX
651:LucaviX
630:LucaviX
409:Adraeus
390:dispute
321:Adraeus
292:Dogface
254:LucaviX
42:21:22,
40:Matthew
2581:WP:ATT
2401:double
2181:Wesley
2079:Wesley
1656:Wesley
1554:Since
1314:09:19
1191:23:04
1165:(UTC).
1158:20:55
978:Tjb891
927:Tjb891
849:Fenice
437:Marafa
333:KayEss
283:Tjb891
270:Wesley
231:Tjb891
213:Wesley
180:Pedant
162:prayer
147:Wesley
135:IHCOYC
127:France
88:Wesley
56:Wesley
2694:Carlo
2558:. --
1623:page.
1556:Carlo
1502:Carlo
1447:Carlo
1377:Carlo
1327:Carlo
1289:Carlo
1261:Carlo
807:Ataru
592:every
386:topic
44:Jesus
16:<
3209:Talk
3179:T@lk
3129:Talk
3105:T@lk
3074:Talk
3039:T@lk
3012:Talk
2935:T@lk
2902:Talk
2875:T@lk
2845:Talk
2791:T@lk
2751:T@lk
2721:Talk
2710:NPOV
2698:talk
2652:T@lk
2525:T@lk
2321:rson
2217:] ,
2168:talk
2122:Talk
2022:Talk
1957:Talk
1704:Talk
1633:Talk
1568:Talk
1528:Talk
1464:Talk
1454:See
1398:TALK
1348:TALK
1319:2006
1308:Rich
1278:T@lk
1226:T@lk
1196:2006
1185:Rich
1163:2006
1152:Rich
1134:T@lk
1063:and
822:T@lk
791:T@lk
726:The
567:T@lk
517:T@lk
504:lack
496:does
471:T@lk
357:T@lk
337:talk
197:JeMa
3197:why
3193:how
3174:JFW
3148:why
3144:how
3100:JFW
3034:JFW
2930:JFW
2870:JFW
2786:JFW
2746:JFW
2739:POV
2647:JFW
2520:JFW
2263:FOo
2224:],
2174:) .
1973:.--
1273:JFW
1221:JFW
1129:JFW
1092:.)
913:--
847:.--
817:JFW
786:JFW
775:HKT
740:not
715:HKT
709:: "
613:.--
562:JFW
512:JFW
466:JFW
352:JFW
350:).
105:or
38:In
3263:--
3253:--
3211:)
3176:|
3131:)
3102:|
3076:)
3054:--
3036:|
3014:)
2932:|
2904:)
2872:|
2847:)
2788:|
2784:.
2748:|
2742:}}
2736:{{
2723:)
2700:)
2649:|
2522:|
2392:"
2170:•
2128:)
2039:I
2028:)
1963:)
1754:31
1710:)
1650:.
1639:)
1574:)
1534:)
1470:)
1305:.
1275:|
1223:|
1131:|
1067:.
819:|
788:|
564:|
514:|
468:|
435:--
354:|
335:|
331:—
86:.
3207:(
3127:(
3072:(
3010:(
2900:(
2843:(
2719:(
2696:(
2390:.
2378:-
2342:"
2338:"
2316:E
2246:Y
2242:X
2166:(
2124:/
2120:(
2024:/
2020:(
1959:/
1955:(
1706:/
1702:(
1667:.
1635:/
1631:(
1570:/
1566:(
1530:/
1526:(
1466:/
1462:(
392:.
346:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.