371:
350:
219:
381:
190:
271:
250:
459:
One of the reason why the advert tag was placed on the results section was because it was poorly written. I've now done some fixes consistent with that, and it is blatant advertising to talk about upcoming shows and matches without independent sources. It's harder to source upcoming events than it is
552:
Thanks for that info. If the AfD results were "delete", not "merge", but a substantial portion of the deleted content was pasted here instead, then that is contrary to the decisions made so that stuff should definitely go, per the AfD results. If somebody rescued a few sentences that might have been
499:
with even more fancruft in it. When I look at the sources I see some RS (and quite a bit of non-RS) but not enough good sources to cover the article. There are whole unreferenced sections and detailed tables with not a reference in sight. Stuff like the bracket diagrams strike me as pure fancruft.
537:
I agree with IanPCP on the Havoc and
Regression, Training School, and tournament sections. The title histories can stay. I'm apathetic on the roster. There were AfDs for the tournament lists and some of the championships last spring, it seems someone thought it was a good idea to paste them here
661:
as I requested. I rollbacked them after they were blocked but the sources I asked for are indeed out there. I'll leave it up to someone else to fully remove the championships, I just trimmed out the "combined reigns" section. If we're using GFW as the template, these sections don't exist on the
460:
to source results, as primary sources are allowed for the latter but not the former. I'll leave it for now, but it's getting to the point that some general review work should considered for at least 2012 to be placed in one section with a focus on TNA's
British Bootcamp taping at the show.
494:
I was discussing an article about another wrestling promotion and somebody mentioned this article as a possible good template. So I came here and had a look and it looks like the opposite of a good template to me. It seems massively over-detailed. There is even
522:
I reckon the "Jimmy Havoc and
Regression" section can go. Same can probably be said for the "Training School" section. All the tournaments can probably be removed too. I'd say the title histories/etc and rosters and necessary though.
474:
Since I was last here, none of the problems have been resolved. Nothing is sourced for 2014, and I'm starting to suspect that this page is being used as a sub promotionsl site. When I have time I'll be looking into this further.
153:
575:
579:
506:
I've put a tag on each article (nothing too drastic at this stage) and it would be good if somebody who is better able to judge the real notability than I am (having only just seen it) could have a look.
642:
promoted to GA and that article has a section for its championship because of the coverage it received. The championships will be the next to be removed from this article if there are no improvements.
567:
726:
332:
322:
290:
731:
721:
682:
During
Progress Chapter 108: Of Course You Realize This Means War, Jinny announced that she was abdicating the Women’s Championship due to the circumstances of the pandemic.
147:
600:
I'll start by removing the sections I'd suggested (that you seem to agree with). I'll leave the other stuff (the sections that had previously been voted on) for now though
571:
200:
582:. For the record, I apparently told one of the people responsible that it was ok to copy the World Championship material but not the tournaments. Everyone voted delete,
298:
741:
427:
736:
294:
281:
255:
79:
44:
638:. The big difference between GFW and these two articles is that ample coverage exists in reliable secondary sources for the GFW belts. I actually got
437:
685:
85:
500:
Even if they can be referenced to things like
Cagematch (which is good for verifiability) it doesn't help with demonstrating notability.
702:
746:
403:
168:
135:
99:
30:
627:. I don't think that appearing on three shows is a good measurement in judging whether or not these guys are on a "roster".
104:
20:
394:
355:
74:
230:
496:
65:
129:
196:
125:
218:
698:
686:
http://backbodydrop.com/blog/reviews/progress-chapter-108-of-course-you-realise-this-means-war-april-10-2021/
109:
635:
286:
175:
694:
558:
512:
236:
631:
690:
189:
161:
55:
402:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
476:
461:
70:
24:
634:
folks argued that their championships should appear there because there are similar sections on
586:
later said that the work was copied from a fansite, so that's something we'll have to look into.
141:
289:. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the
51:
667:
647:
605:
591:
554:
543:
528:
508:
480:
465:
639:
583:
386:
715:
624:
370:
349:
663:
643:
601:
587:
553:
OK but not a big chunk of content which everybody else had decided to delete. --
539:
524:
376:
706:
671:
651:
609:
595:
562:
547:
532:
516:
484:
469:
623:
I went ahead and removed the roster. For one thing, it's unsourced and
503:
So my question is this: Does this article need to go on a crash diet?
399:
630:
I've tagged the championships section for a lack of sources too. The
576:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Natural
Progression Series Tournament
270:
249:
580:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Super Strong Style 16 Tournament
212:
184:
15:
285:, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to
568:
658:
160:
398:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
297:, where you can join the project and contribute to
678:Progress Chapter 108/Progress Women’s Championship
572:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Progress World Cup
662:article because they take up way too much space.
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
727:Low-importance Professional wrestling articles
174:
8:
307:Knowledge:WikiProject Professional wrestling
732:WikiProject Professional wrestling articles
722:Start-Class Professional wrestling articles
310:Template:WikiProject Professional wrestling
216:
344:
244:
742:Low-importance England-related articles
346:
246:
538:after they were deleted individually.
7:
737:Start-Class England-related articles
392:This article is within the scope of
235:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
282:WikiProject Professional wrestling
14:
379:
369:
348:
269:
248:
217:
199:on 7 August 2013. The result of
188:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
432:This article has been rated as
327:This article has been rated as
313:Professional wrestling articles
195:This article was nominated for
1:
672:09:13, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
533:13:55, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
517:17:21, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
412:Knowledge:WikiProject England
406:and see a list of open tasks.
42:Put new text under old text.
652:11:47, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
470:21:48, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
415:Template:WikiProject England
610:01:38, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
596:20:13, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
563:14:46, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
548:07:31, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
50:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
763:
707:21:04, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
485:03:13, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
438:project's importance scale
333:project's importance scale
747:WikiProject England pages
657:To be fair, a sockpuppet
431:
364:
326:
264:
243:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
418:England-related articles
279:is within the scope of
636:Global Force Wrestling
304:Professional wrestling
287:professional wrestling
256:Professional wrestling
225:This article is rated
75:avoid personal attacks
100:Neutral point of view
105:No original research
395:WikiProject England
291:project to-do page
277:Progress Wrestling
231:content assessment
86:dispute resolution
47:
25:Progress Wrestling
693:comment added by
632:Defiant Wrestling
497:a spinoff article
452:
451:
448:
447:
444:
443:
343:
342:
339:
338:
211:
210:
183:
182:
66:Assume good faith
43:
754:
709:
420:
419:
416:
413:
410:
389:
384:
383:
382:
373:
366:
365:
360:
352:
345:
315:
314:
311:
308:
305:
273:
266:
265:
260:
252:
245:
228:
222:
221:
213:
192:
185:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
762:
761:
757:
756:
755:
753:
752:
751:
712:
711:
688:
680:
492:
457:
417:
414:
411:
408:
407:
385:
380:
378:
358:
312:
309:
306:
303:
302:
293:, or visit the
258:
229:on Knowledge's
226:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
760:
758:
750:
749:
744:
739:
734:
729:
724:
714:
713:
679:
676:
675:
674:
640:Extreme Rising
621:
620:
619:
618:
617:
616:
615:
614:
613:
612:
491:
488:
456:
453:
450:
449:
446:
445:
442:
441:
434:Low-importance
430:
424:
423:
421:
404:the discussion
391:
390:
387:England portal
374:
362:
361:
359:Low‑importance
353:
341:
340:
337:
336:
329:Low-importance
325:
319:
318:
316:
274:
262:
261:
259:Low‑importance
253:
241:
240:
234:
223:
209:
208:
201:the discussion
193:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
759:
748:
745:
743:
740:
738:
735:
733:
730:
728:
725:
723:
720:
719:
717:
710:
708:
704:
700:
696:
695:Redertainment
692:
687:
683:
677:
673:
669:
665:
660:
659:added sources
656:
655:
654:
653:
649:
645:
641:
637:
633:
628:
626:
611:
607:
603:
599:
598:
597:
593:
589:
585:
581:
577:
573:
569:
566:
565:
564:
560:
556:
551:
550:
549:
545:
541:
536:
535:
534:
530:
526:
521:
520:
519:
518:
514:
510:
504:
501:
498:
490:Over-detailed
489:
487:
486:
482:
478:
472:
471:
467:
463:
455:Fixing issues
454:
439:
435:
429:
426:
425:
422:
405:
401:
397:
396:
388:
377:
375:
372:
368:
367:
363:
357:
354:
351:
347:
334:
330:
324:
321:
320:
317:
300:
296:
292:
288:
284:
283:
278:
275:
272:
268:
267:
263:
257:
254:
251:
247:
242:
238:
232:
224:
220:
215:
214:
206:
202:
198:
194:
191:
187:
186:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
689:— Preceding
684:
681:
629:
622:
505:
502:
493:
473:
458:
433:
393:
328:
295:project page
280:
276:
237:WikiProjects
205:no consensus
204:
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
555:DanielRigal
509:DanielRigal
299:discussions
227:Start-class
148:free images
31:not a forum
716:Categories
584:Nickag989
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
703:contribs
691:unsigned
197:deletion
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
436:on the
409:England
400:England
356:England
331:on the
154:WPÂ refs
142:scholar
664:LM2000
644:LM2000
602:IanPCP
588:LM2000
540:LM2000
525:IanPCP
477:BerleT
462:BerleT
233:scale.
126:Google
625:WP:OR
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
699:talk
668:talk
648:talk
606:talk
592:talk
559:talk
544:talk
529:talk
513:talk
481:talk
466:talk
203:was
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
428:Low
323:Low
176:TWL
718::
705:)
701:•
670:)
650:)
608:)
594:)
578:,
574:,
570:,
561:)
546:)
531:)
515:)
507:--
483:)
468:)
156:)
54:;
697:(
666:(
646:(
604:(
590:(
557:(
542:(
527:(
511:(
479:(
464:(
440:.
335:.
301:.
239::
207:.
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
