1056:
star would be used just to oppose the force of gravity. The gravitational binding energy of a gas star is about 1.1G(M^2)/R. Using the viral equation, if (Mc^2)/3 is equal to 1/2 of 1.1 G(M^2)/R, the radius R of this star equals 1.65GM/(c^2), or 0.82 the
Schwarzschild radius. There is observational evidence that a large finite size star is contained in a black hole: Some super massive black holes have been observed spinning at about 1/10 RPM, which implies a star of very large radius. The existance of an about 0.82 Schwarschild radius star, instead of a conventional black hole point singularity, would probably mean the end of the conventional big bang model as coming from a point singularity. If 2 approximately equal mass 0.82 Schwarzchild radius stars merged the contents would be expected to be ejected at the speed of light from the contact point. This model could explain where our inflationary universe came from. It could also explain a possible ancient explosion at the center of M87.
523:
865:
true. Therefore it is important to discuss strange quark matter in relation to quark matter and it is also important to discuss strange stars in relation to quark stars. If the Bodmer-Witten hypothesis is wrong, quark and strange stars will always by hybrid stars and could only exist as a subgroup of neutron stars. The whole idea of writing a separate article on quark stars, apart from neutron stars, is the Bodmer-Witten assumption, that strange quark matter is stable at low temperatures and pressures.
292:
431:
513:
485:
359:
325:
703:
589:
455:
499:
345:
627:
283:
1073:
and ultra relativistic stars, ie. something that could and should be discussed in a completely different fora than
Knowledge. If you need me to clarify specific details as to why this has nothing to do with Quark Stars, please post your questions below. Most of them however, will explain themselves to you, if you study the subject of Quark Stars on your own first.
661:
369:
232:
754:. There is a Danish-language article on strange stars, so we get a nice interwiki link, and they make more sense if they link articles on the same things. But on the other hand, everything that one can say about a strange star is also something about strange matter, so we can't really remove the information from
1171:
Ah, I think I get your drift now? Yes, if the stellar core of the nova is small enough and light enough, it cannot resist the heavy radiation pressure bouncing back, when the neutron star/hybrid star (with quark matter core) is produced and the whole thing will disintegrate, just as you describes it.
1148:
If neutrons in the core disintegrated collider results indicate that about 90% of the neutron mass should be converted to gamma rays (which would exit the star) and about 10% of the neutron mass should be converted to quark matter. Quark matter is mostly charged particles associated with high energy
1055:
Revised: The contents of a light containing star would be expected to be ultra relativistic. If the pressure P of ultra relativistic material is given as (rho)(c^2)/3 , the total supporting energy or viral energy of this star would be ∫PdV = (Mc^2)/3, meaning a whopping 1/3 of the mass energy of the
864:
Hello to all above in this section on "Strange Matter". Quark matter is highly unstable except under very extreme conditions of high temperature and/or pressure. This instability might change radically, by the introduction of strange quarks, at least if the Bodmer-witten assumption turns out to hold
1286:
I think it first and foremost belongs to the article on quark matter and strange quark matter respectively. It can be fitted in here as well, but it would need a solid explanation on how quark stars contribute with nuggets. They would indeed do if they exist in the first place, but it would need an
1072:
Hello. What you are discussing here, has nothing to do with Quark Stars. If it is of any relevance at all, it would be on the talk page on black holes. I dont think it is even relevant there, as what you are writing about and searching for is an engaged discussion about your ideas about black holes
1581:
Hello. You are right. As strange quark matter is a specific subgroup under quark matter, so are strange stars a subgroup under quark stars. The quark matter that might theoretically form in the core of neutron stars, can be very exotic and show a high degree of diversity though. Charm quark matter
1193:
I don't think a star of ultra relativistic matter collapses even if its smaller than the
Schwarzschild radius. This is because ultra relativistic pressure (like other pressures) increases as the inverse of R-cubed. The pressure increases faster than gravitational forces or gravitational potential
1128:
radiating from the quark matter itself, just as well as from the degenerate neutron matter. The heat is caused by the supernova-process and is a manifestation of converted angular momentum and gravitational energy. Read about the Viral
Theorem fx.. There is no differences from how ordinary neutron
1397:
The presence of this section needs a good explanation. The quark states discussed here, is more related to neutron stars, than quark stars. The various quark states might form at the core of neutron stars, under the extreme pressure and temperature, but they are not equivalent to what we know as
868:
I have rewritten part of the article now and supplied some vital information on the differences and similarities of quark stars and strange stars. It can still be improved - especially the discussion on the binding forces of the "giant hadron" (not misspelled! :) and certainly the section on the
766:
It might be good to talk about
Strange Matter/Quark Matter (I'd advocate the latter terminology) purely in terms of the physics of degenerate matter and the debate over it's plausibility (ie, does QCD allow the arrangement? Is the degeneracy pressure provided by the strong nuclear force strictly
1007:
Generally speaking, it would also be a lot more constructive, if you put in specific cn-tags in the article, as I can not see where this article is lacking refs, except for a few issues where you have put up tags (thanks!). If anything should be improved, specific tags are needed, otherwise the
979:
as the article contains far too many statements that are not sourced. There's also "However, the investigating team of
Prashanth Jaikumar, Sanjay Reddy, and Andrew W. Steiner made some fundamental assumptions, that led to uncertainties in their results large enough that the case is not finally
1426:
page, there is "overwhelming evidence that the claimed pentaquarks do not exist". The idea of 4, 5, and 6 quark hadrons has been discarded by the particle physics community. But this is besides the point, theoretical hadrons have nothing to do with structure of a quark star. It would be more
1177:
You are touching a very central issue in relation to stars in general here. A stars life is a balance between gravitational collapse and outward radiation pressure. If one of these opposing forces wins, the star will disintegrate. This holds true for all stars. A life in the balance :-)
1273:
It is speculated and subject to scientific investigation if (strange) quark matter once formed, might in fact be stable under zero external pressure (ie. in interstellar space). Nuggets of (strange) quark matter is thus one of several candidates for the theoretical and unknown
997:
About the article of
Prashant et.al.. What is your point? I have been involved with this article (and also done research on the subject) and I totally fail to see your point in this regard. Could you explain yourself, so someone (perhaps me) can help improve the content of the
1119:
There is no particle reactions going on inside the quark matter, so there will be no production of light or other particles. Only when matter from the outside gets in contact with the qm, will there be some reactions and glitches will occur. Possibly gamma-glitches.
1911:
1172:
However, for a neutron star to be born in the first place, the core will be rather massive and the gravitational pressure will be exactly huge enough to resist the radiation pressure from the conversion-processes. It all depends on gravitation and mass (almost).
715:
834:"Some of these quarks may then become strange quarks and form strange matter. The star then becomes known as a "quark star" or "strange star", similar to a single gigantic hardon (but bound by gravity rather than the strong force)"
1030:
I have done a little work now and put up a ref-improve in the section on alternative QCD states for example. going through the individual QCD states and reffing them should be a somewhat easy task and perhaps a bit fun even ?
1088:
Simply stated, by a Quark star do you mean a neutron star with some quark matter production in the core? If so, shouldn't there simultaneously be much larger radiation production that the star would not contain?
344:
179:
793:
I have to say, is this an entirely appropriate line to include in the introduction to this article? Surely stating that a quark star is like a giant hadron is akin to stating that a neutron star is like a
1881:
1936:
296:
1133:
Whatever happens inside the quark matter, it will all be hold together by gravity and will not dissolve, due to the incredibly strong forces of the neutron degenerate lattice surrounding it.
767:
analogous to neutron or electron degeneracy pressure? Are exotic quark flavors required or implied by the theory?) and move the bulk of the astrophysical considerations to this writeup.
936:
Wired, Popular
Science, and Astronomy Picture of the Day are not authoritative sources. Please replace these references with links to the papers they cite (or quote but don't cite).--
1871:
1901:
1886:
1931:
1149:
and should quickly recombine in a neutron star to form conventional nuclei. I don't see how quark matter could exist in a stable neutron star core in the way you describe.
421:
1401:
The section at hand, has been discussed for various reasons previously. For the sake of structure and readability, I have collected these comments and discussions below.
1247:
I believe I have cleared up this problem by now. From now on, the article calls for an elaboration on the characteristics of quark stars and strange stars specifically.
1229:
I have done some preliminary work by explaining what quark and strange stars are in the new "Creation" section. The "Strange Star" section still needs to be rewritten.
1683:
173:
1856:
1906:
1765:
1761:
1747:
1713:
579:
1916:
1896:
779:
The star then becomes known as a "quark star" or "strange star", similar to a single gigantic hadron (but bound by gravity rather than the color force).
440:
411:
335:
105:
1866:
727:
1926:
569:
1876:
980:
settled." Did this team issue a revised report based on a better understanding of the data or is this an an academic pot-shot by someone else? --
783:
The force of gravity may have much to do with the binding of such a star, but wouldn't the color force also contribute to the binding energy? --
522:
111:
1464:
All
Strange stars are Quark stars. But, not all Quark stars are Strange stars. Other Quark Stars. Strange Exotic States and Compact Stars
1703:
1156:
1057:
1891:
1693:
1195:
1096:
647:
545:
70:
1111:
Is this a question to me? If so you need to use the ":" marks. Whoever the question was meant for, I believe I can answer it anyway:
1921:
1833:
1564:
845:
1684:
http://web.archive.org/web/20060313223759/http://www.popsci.com/popsci/aviationspace/a6885b4a1db84010vgnvcm1000004eecbccdrcrd.html
1861:
382:
330:
125:
56:
1714:
http://web.archive.org/web/20090213124158/http://capca.ucalgary.ca:80/~bniebergal/webPHP/research.php?subdir=strangeQuarkStars
130:
46:
1687:
536:
490:
252:
100:
194:
1808:
1717:
305:
267:
906:
Is it strictly necessary to have strange quarks? If not then "Strange star" requres splitting into a separate section.
161:
91:
605:
248:
1764:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
212:
1490:
pentaquark state with an antistrange quark & four light quarks consisting of up- and down-quarks only (qqqq
1450:
1160:
1061:
1199:
1799:
1675:
1538:
Almost all of the particles suggested here contain strange quarks, and thus do not support your assertion.--
1100:
155:
135:
849:
1446:
256:
1837:
1783:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1771:
1704:
http://web.archive.org/web/20030402151744/http://www.wired.com:80/news/technology/0,1282,51943-2,00.html
1568:
985:
959:
311:
1674:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
869:"characteristics" of these stars -, but I believe the basics are represented in the article as of now.
151:
907:
1829:
1738:
1694:
http://web.archive.org/web/20030418110053/http://curious.astro.cornell.edu:80/question.php?number=445
1634:
1368:
1323:
1152:
1092:
841:
806:
498:
282:
1620:
1592:
1408:
1292:
1252:
1234:
1219:
1183:
1138:
1078:
1036:
1013:
973:
921:
874:
759:
445:
187:
81:
896:
650:
for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.
544:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
201:
1428:
1358:
1279:
735:
706:
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between
217:
96:
1768:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
824:
I don't know about the rest of you(s) but my Giant Hardon defies gravity and is not bound by it.
801:
Not being an expert, I'd move for a second opinion, but I think that line should be reworded. --
680:
on April 2010. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see
1784:
1497:
light pentaquarks are grouped within an antidecuplet, the lightest candidate, Ө+ (big epsilon)
462:
An appropriate image needs to be added to this article, or the current one needs to be updated.
430:
1707:
1625:
1543:
941:
673:
77:
1642:
1376:
1331:
981:
955:
374:
214:
1791:
1697:
1474:
H-dibaryon, a six-quark state with equal numbers of up-, down-, and strange quarks (uuddss)
1349:
Zhitnitsky, Ariel R (2003). "'Nonbaryonic' dark matter as baryonic colour superconductor".
802:
687:
1688:
http://www.popsci.com/popsci/aviationspace/a6885b4a1db84010vgnvcm1000004eecbccdrcrd.html
1638:
1380:
1372:
1327:
950:
This article needs a serious overhaul. I hope to get to it in the near future, now that
167:
1750:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
1588:
1436:
1404:
1288:
1248:
1230:
1215:
1179:
1134:
1074:
1032:
1009:
917:
870:
755:
751:
528:
1790:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1587:
As the article is now here in 2014, I can see that this issue is no longer a problem?
1850:
1718:
http://www.capca.ucalgary.ca/~bniebergal/webPHP/research.php?subdir=strangeQuarkStars
1531:
731:
1646:
1539:
1214:
As of now, the section on Strange Stars does not describe what a strange star is.
937:
795:
784:
1223:
1912:
Pages within the scope of WikiProject Astronomical objects (WP Astronomy Banner)
1757:
1275:
702:
639:
512:
484:
1756:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
1667:
1423:
951:
889:
750:
I can't decide whether strange stars deserve their own article, separate from
719:
677:
518:
364:
50:
916:
See discussion under "Strange Matter" above. And my comment specifically :-)
1432:
1335:
387:
358:
324:
1527:
588:
454:
1363:
541:
1563:- so it does support his assertion, since atleast one is not strange.
216:
1500:
can also be described by the diquark model of Jaffe and Wilczek (QCD)
255:. Specific illustrations, plots or diagrams can be requested at the
1483:
pentaquark states were first proposed with a charm anti-quark (qqqs
231:
1841:
1813:
1596:
1572:
1547:
1454:
1440:
1412:
1296:
1256:
1238:
1203:
1187:
1164:
1142:
1104:
1082:
1065:
1040:
1017:
988:
963:
945:
925:
910:
878:
853:
810:
739:
1826:
Be more analytical about that! It's fundamentally important!
1822:
quark star = electroweak star / black hole = strong force star
655:
621:
276:
226:
218:
41:
28:
15:
1468:
Jaffe 1977, suggested a four-quark state with strangeness (qs
1422:
This section should be deleted. First of all, to requote the
1723:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
758:
that I've moved here... Oh, I'll think about it later... --
587:
453:
429:
230:
35:
Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page.
1708:
http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,51943-2,00.html
1678:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
1051:
Size of Quark Star composed of ultra relativistic material
1698:
http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/question.php?number=445
1671:
682:
668:
643:
634:
1314:
Witten, Edward (1984). "Cosmic separation of phases".
1115:
Please read the article on what defines a Quark Star.
186:
1882:
Knowledge level-5 vital articles in Physical sciences
1623:) (2008). "Review of Particle Physics: Pentaquarks".
697:
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
540:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1937:
Knowledge requested photographs of physics subjects
1760:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
1393:On the section: "Other theorized quark formations"
1445:I also think that this section is not relevant.
59:for general discussion of the article's subject.
1582:have also been discussed in the literature fx..
1516:), memeber of the light pentaquark antidecuplet
1271:
1746:This message was posted before February 2018.
1477:bound multi-quark systems with heavy quarks QQ
1351:Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
1872:Knowledge vital articles in Physical sciences
200:
8:
1902:C-Class Astronomy articles of Low-importance
1523:) state was detected by the H1 collaboration
444:, which collaborates on articles related to
386:, which collaborates on articles related to
1887:C-Class vital articles in Physical sciences
686:; for the discussion at that location, see
465:Once this has been done, please remove the
1932:C-Class physics articles of Mid-importance
1827:
625:
479:
319:
1666:I have just modified 4 external links on
1362:
728:Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment
1528:http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/astro-ph/0608317
1008:chances of improvement is close to 0 %.
632:Text and/or other creative content from
1607:
1306:
1269:I cut this paragraph from the article:
798:-- misleading and factually inaccurate.
726:Above undated message substituted from
481:
321:
280:
1857:Knowledge requested astronomy diagrams
466:
1907:C-Class Astronomical objects articles
1735:to let others know (documentation at
1505:Ө++ (big epsilon) & antiparticle
642:on 30 August 2010. The former page's
7:
534:This article is within the scope of
380:This article is within the scope of
1129:stars will behave in this respect.
888:Shouldn't this article redirect to
310:It is of interest to the following
49:for discussing improvements to the
711:
707:
14:
1917:Astronomy articles needing images
1897:Low-importance Astronomy articles
1670:. Please take a moment to review
1519:charmed pentaquark Өc(3100) (uudd
1867:Knowledge level-5 vital articles
1512:doubly strange pentaquark (sssdd
714:. Further details are available
701:
659:
596:An editor has requested that an
521:
511:
497:
483:
441:WikiProject Astronomical objects
367:
357:
343:
323:
290:
281:
71:Click here to start a new topic.
1927:Mid-importance physics articles
574:This article has been rated as
416:This article has been rated as
396:Knowledge:WikiProject Astronomy
262:For more information, refer to
1877:C-Class level-5 vital articles
1647:10.1016/j.physletb.2008.07.018
1210:The section on 'Strange stars'
399:Template:WikiProject Astronomy
1:
1573:06:51, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
1455:14:40, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
1381:10.1088/1475-7516/2003/10/010
1066:22:29, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
1041:05:10, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
1018:04:31, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
989:22:32, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
554:Knowledge:WikiProject Physics
548:and see a list of open tasks.
469:parameter from this template.
438:This article is supported by
68:Put new text under old text.
1548:21:40, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
1209:
964:16:10, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
946:21:40, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
811:13:48, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
740:07:35, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
557:Template:WikiProject Physics
1441:05:54, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
1188:00:34, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
1124:There will however be some
854:00:21, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
76:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
1953:
1892:C-Class Astronomy articles
1842:01:49, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
1777:(last update: 5 June 2024)
1663:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
1597:23:24, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
1418:Theorized Quark Formations
1413:13:20, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
1257:23:27, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
1239:04:16, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
926:13:39, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
879:13:45, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
580:project's importance scale
422:project's importance scale
268:Knowledge:Requested images
1814:12:59, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
1427:appropriate to reference
1297:01:59, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
1224:23:44, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
1204:21:14, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
911:03:22, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
638:was copied or moved into
595:
573:
506:
461:
437:
415:
352:
318:
106:Be welcoming to newcomers
22:Skip to table of contents
1922:C-Class physics articles
1165:23:55, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
1143:22:26, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
1105:21:44, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
1083:00:10, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
969:I have hatted this with
762:19:30 19 Jun 2003 (UTC)
239:It is requested that an
21:
1659:External links modified
1336:10.1103/PhysRevD.30.272
264:discussion on this page
1862:C-Class vital articles
1284:
902:Quark non-strange star
829:Epic Typo for the Win.
781:
592:
458:
434:
266:and/or the listing at
235:
101:avoid personal attacks
777:
718:. Student editor(s):
666:The contents of the
591:
457:
433:
383:WikiProject Astronomy
297:level-5 vital article
234:
126:Neutral point of view
1758:regular verification
954:is in decent shape.
796:giant atomic nucleus
446:astronomical objects
336:Astronomical objects
131:No original research
1748:After February 2018
1727:parameter below to
1639:2008PhLB..667....1P
1621:Particle Data Group
1559:is not the same as
1373:2003JCAP...10..010Z
1328:1984PhRvD..30..272W
1278:, featured in many
648:provide attribution
537:WikiProject Physics
253:improve its quality
251:in this article to
1802:InternetArchiveBot
1753:InternetArchiveBot
1429:Quark-gluon plasma
716:on the course page
593:
459:
435:
402:Astronomy articles
306:content assessment
236:
112:dispute resolution
73:
36:
1844:
1832:comment added by
1778:
1626:Physics Letters B
1316:Physical Review D
1155:comment added by
1095:comment added by
844:comment added by
694:
693:
654:
653:
620:
619:
616:
615:
612:
611:
478:
477:
474:
473:
470:
275:
274:
271:
241:astronomy diagram
225:
224:
92:Assume good faith
69:
40:
39:
34:
27:
26:
1944:
1812:
1803:
1776:
1775:
1754:
1742:
1651:
1650:
1612:
1522:
1515:
1508:
1493:
1486:
1480:
1471:
1385:
1384:
1366:
1346:
1340:
1339:
1311:
1167:
1107:
978:
972:
856:
742:
713:
712:10 December 2021
709:
705:
685:
663:
662:
656:
637:
629:
628:
622:
608:to this article.
562:
561:
560:physics articles
558:
555:
552:
531:
526:
525:
515:
508:
507:
502:
501:
500:
495:
487:
480:
468:
467:|needs-image=yes
464:
404:
403:
400:
397:
394:
377:
375:Astronomy portal
372:
371:
370:
361:
354:
353:
348:
347:
346:
341:
338:
327:
320:
303:
294:
293:
286:
285:
277:
261:
227:
219:
205:
204:
190:
121:Article policies
42:
29:
16:
1952:
1951:
1947:
1946:
1945:
1943:
1942:
1941:
1847:
1846:
1824:
1806:
1801:
1769:
1762:have permission
1752:
1736:
1676:this simple FaQ
1661:
1656:
1655:
1654:
1614:
1613:
1609:
1520:
1513:
1506:
1491:
1484:
1478:
1469:
1462:
1447:Mi Tatara Buela
1420:
1398:quark matter.
1395:
1390:
1389:
1388:
1357:(10): 010–010.
1348:
1347:
1343:
1313:
1312:
1308:
1267:
1212:
1150:
1090:
1053:
976:
970:
934:
904:
892:or vice versa?
886:
839:
838:August 9,2011
748:
725:
699:
681:
660:
633:
626:
559:
556:
553:
550:
549:
527:
520:
496:
493:
401:
398:
395:
392:
391:
373:
368:
366:
342:
339:
333:
304:on Knowledge's
301:
291:
221:
220:
215:
147:
142:
141:
140:
117:
87:
12:
11:
5:
1950:
1948:
1940:
1939:
1934:
1929:
1924:
1919:
1914:
1909:
1904:
1899:
1894:
1889:
1884:
1879:
1874:
1869:
1864:
1859:
1849:
1848:
1823:
1820:
1818:
1796:
1795:
1788:
1721:
1720:
1712:Added archive
1710:
1702:Added archive
1700:
1692:Added archive
1690:
1682:Added archive
1660:
1657:
1653:
1652:
1606:
1605:
1601:
1600:
1599:
1584:
1583:
1578:
1577:
1576:
1575:
1551:
1550:
1525:
1524:
1517:
1510:
1503:
1502:
1501:
1495:
1488:
1481:
1475:
1472:
1461:
1460:Classification
1458:
1419:
1416:
1394:
1391:
1387:
1386:
1364:hep-ph/0202161
1341:
1322:(2): 272–285.
1305:
1304:
1300:
1266:
1263:
1262:
1261:
1260:
1259:
1242:
1241:
1211:
1208:
1191:
1190:
1174:
1173:
1157:172.129.21.166
1146:
1145:
1086:
1085:
1058:172.162.231.22
1052:
1049:
1048:
1047:
1046:
1045:
1044:
1043:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1020:
1002:
1001:
1000:
999:
992:
991:
933:
930:
929:
928:
903:
900:
885:
882:
836:
835:
831:
830:
826:
825:
822:
816:
815:
814:
813:
799:
764:
756:strange matter
752:strange matter
747:
746:Strange Matter
744:
708:28 August 2021
698:
695:
692:
691:
664:
652:
651:
646:now serves to
630:
618:
617:
614:
613:
610:
609:
594:
584:
583:
576:Mid-importance
572:
566:
565:
563:
546:the discussion
533:
532:
529:Physics portal
516:
504:
503:
494:Mid‑importance
488:
476:
475:
472:
471:
463:
460:
450:
449:
436:
426:
425:
418:Low-importance
414:
408:
407:
405:
379:
378:
362:
350:
349:
340:Low‑importance
328:
316:
315:
309:
287:
273:
272:
260:
237:
223:
222:
213:
211:
210:
207:
206:
144:
143:
139:
138:
133:
128:
119:
118:
116:
115:
108:
103:
94:
88:
86:
85:
74:
65:
64:
61:
60:
54:
38:
37:
32:
25:
24:
19:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1949:
1938:
1935:
1933:
1930:
1928:
1925:
1923:
1920:
1918:
1915:
1913:
1910:
1908:
1905:
1903:
1900:
1898:
1895:
1893:
1890:
1888:
1885:
1883:
1880:
1878:
1875:
1873:
1870:
1868:
1865:
1863:
1860:
1858:
1855:
1854:
1852:
1845:
1843:
1839:
1835:
1831:
1821:
1819:
1816:
1815:
1810:
1805:
1804:
1793:
1789:
1786:
1782:
1781:
1780:
1773:
1767:
1763:
1759:
1755:
1749:
1744:
1740:
1734:
1730:
1726:
1719:
1715:
1711:
1709:
1705:
1701:
1699:
1695:
1691:
1689:
1685:
1681:
1680:
1679:
1677:
1673:
1669:
1664:
1658:
1648:
1644:
1640:
1636:
1632:
1628:
1627:
1622:
1618:
1611:
1608:
1604:
1598:
1594:
1590:
1586:
1585:
1580:
1579:
1574:
1570:
1566:
1562:
1558:
1555:
1554:
1553:
1552:
1549:
1545:
1541:
1537:
1536:
1535:
1533:
1529:
1518:
1511:
1504:
1499:
1498:
1496:
1489:
1482:
1476:
1473:
1467:
1466:
1465:
1459:
1457:
1456:
1452:
1448:
1443:
1442:
1438:
1434:
1430:
1425:
1417:
1415:
1414:
1410:
1406:
1402:
1399:
1392:
1382:
1378:
1374:
1370:
1365:
1360:
1356:
1352:
1345:
1342:
1337:
1333:
1329:
1325:
1321:
1317:
1310:
1307:
1303:
1299:
1298:
1294:
1290:
1287:explanation.
1283:
1281:
1277:
1270:
1264:
1258:
1254:
1250:
1246:
1245:
1244:
1243:
1240:
1236:
1232:
1228:
1227:
1226:
1225:
1221:
1217:
1207:
1205:
1201:
1197:
1196:108.46.17.166
1189:
1185:
1181:
1176:
1175:
1170:
1169:
1168:
1166:
1162:
1158:
1154:
1144:
1140:
1136:
1132:
1127:
1126:residual heat
1123:
1118:
1114:
1110:
1109:
1108:
1106:
1102:
1098:
1094:
1084:
1080:
1076:
1071:
1070:
1069:
1067:
1063:
1059:
1050:
1042:
1038:
1034:
1029:
1028:
1027:
1026:
1025:
1024:
1019:
1015:
1011:
1006:
1005:
1004:
1003:
996:
995:
994:
993:
990:
987:
983:
975:
968:
967:
966:
965:
961:
957:
953:
948:
947:
943:
939:
931:
927:
923:
919:
915:
914:
913:
912:
909:
901:
899:
898:
893:
891:
883:
881:
880:
876:
872:
866:
862:
861:
857:
855:
851:
847:
843:
833:
832:
828:
827:
823:
821:
820:Giant Hardon!
818:
817:
812:
808:
804:
800:
797:
792:
791:
790:
789:
788:
786:
780:
776:
775:
774:Giant Hadron?
771:
768:
763:
761:
757:
753:
745:
743:
741:
737:
733:
729:
723:
721:
717:
704:
696:
689:
688:its talk page
684:
679:
675:
671:
670:
665:
658:
657:
649:
645:
641:
636:
631:
624:
623:
607:
603:
599:
590:
586:
585:
581:
577:
571:
568:
567:
564:
547:
543:
539:
538:
530:
524:
519:
517:
514:
510:
509:
505:
492:
489:
486:
482:
456:
452:
451:
447:
443:
442:
432:
428:
427:
423:
419:
413:
410:
409:
406:
390:on Knowledge.
389:
385:
384:
376:
365:
363:
360:
356:
355:
351:
337:
332:
329:
326:
322:
317:
313:
307:
299:
298:
288:
284:
279:
278:
269:
265:
258:
254:
250:
246:
242:
238:
233:
229:
228:
209:
208:
203:
199:
196:
193:
189:
185:
181:
178:
175:
172:
169:
166:
163:
160:
157:
153:
150:
149:Find sources:
146:
145:
137:
136:Verifiability
134:
132:
129:
127:
124:
123:
122:
113:
109:
107:
104:
102:
98:
95:
93:
90:
89:
83:
79:
78:Learn to edit
75:
72:
67:
66:
63:
62:
58:
52:
48:
44:
43:
33:
31:
30:
23:
20:
18:
17:
1828:— Preceding
1825:
1817:
1800:
1797:
1772:source check
1751:
1745:
1732:
1728:
1724:
1722:
1665:
1662:
1630:
1624:
1616:
1610:
1602:
1560:
1556:
1526:
1463:
1444:
1421:
1403:
1400:
1396:
1354:
1350:
1344:
1319:
1315:
1309:
1301:
1285:
1280:cosmological
1272:
1268:
1213:
1192:
1151:— Preceding
1147:
1130:
1125:
1121:
1116:
1112:
1097:172.162.3.65
1091:— Preceding
1087:
1054:
949:
935:
905:
897:User:Killroy
894:
887:
867:
863:
859:
858:
840:— Preceding
837:
819:
785:User:Kryptid
782:
778:
773:
772:
769:
765:
749:
724:
700:
667:
601:
597:
575:
535:
439:
417:
381:
312:WikiProjects
295:
263:
244:
240:
197:
191:
183:
176:
170:
164:
158:
148:
120:
45:This is the
1834:2.84.212.42
1739:Sourcecheck
1565:76.66.197.2
1276:dark matter
1265:Dark matter
982:Marc Kupper
956:Dark Formal
908:Zzzzzzzzzzz
846:78.32.66.91
683:its history
640:Exotic star
257:Graphic Lab
174:free images
57:not a forum
1851:Categories
1809:Report bug
1668:Quark star
1603:References
1424:Pentaquark
1302:References
974:refimprove
952:strangelet
890:Quark Star
884:Quark Star
803:InvaderXan
678:Quark star
672:page were
669:Preon star
635:Quark star
602:photograph
51:Quark star
1792:this tool
1785:this tool
1615:C. Amser
1589:RhinoMind
1405:RhinoMind
1289:RhinoMind
1282:theories.
1249:RhinoMind
1231:RhinoMind
1216:RhinoMind
1180:RhinoMind
1135:RhinoMind
1075:RhinoMind
1033:RhinoMind
1010:RhinoMind
918:RhinoMind
871:RhinoMind
787:Nov 2006
760:Oliver P.
393:Astronomy
388:Astronomy
331:Astronomy
300:is rated
114:if needed
97:Be polite
47:talk page
1830:unsigned
1798:Cheers.—
1534:1/07/06
1530:Thanks,
1153:unsigned
1093:unsigned
998:article?
842:unsigned
732:PrimeBOT
249:included
245:diagrams
82:get help
55:This is
53:article.
1725:checked
1672:my edit
1635:Bibcode
1540:Cherlin
1487:), 1987
1369:Bibcode
1324:Bibcode
938:Cherlin
932:Sources
860:Answers
770:-Peter
644:history
578:on the
551:Physics
542:Physics
491:Physics
420:on the
302:C-class
180:WP refs
168:scholar
1733:failed
1557:almost
1194:energy
674:merged
308:scale.
152:Google
1633:: 1.
1617:et al
1532:CarpD
1359:arXiv
720:ABT02
676:into
606:added
598:image
289:This
195:JSTOR
156:books
110:Seek
1838:talk
1729:true
1593:talk
1569:talk
1544:talk
1451:talk
1437:talk
1433:Pulu
1409:talk
1355:2003
1293:talk
1253:talk
1235:talk
1220:talk
1206:BG.
1200:talk
1184:talk
1161:talk
1139:talk
1101:talk
1079:talk
1062:talk
1037:talk
1014:talk
986:talk
960:talk
942:talk
922:talk
875:talk
850:talk
807:talk
736:talk
710:and
188:FENS
162:news
99:and
1766:RfC
1743:).
1731:or
1716:to
1706:to
1696:to
1686:to
1643:doi
1631:667
1619:. (
1561:all
1431:.
1377:doi
1332:doi
1068:BG
730:by
604:be
600:or
570:Mid
412:Low
247:be
243:or
202:TWL
1853::
1840:)
1779:.
1774:}}
1770:{{
1741:}}
1737:{{
1641:.
1629:.
1595:)
1571:)
1546:)
1509:--
1479:qq
1470:qs
1453:)
1439:)
1411:)
1375:.
1367:.
1353:.
1330:.
1320:30
1318:.
1295:)
1255:)
1237:)
1222:)
1202:)
1186:)
1163:)
1141:)
1131:4.
1122:3.
1117:2.
1113:1.
1103:)
1081:)
1064:)
1039:)
1016:)
977:}}
971:{{
962:)
944:)
924:)
895:--
877:)
852:)
809:)
738:)
722:.
334::
270:.
259:.
182:)
80:;
1836:(
1811:)
1807:(
1794:.
1787:.
1649:.
1645::
1637::
1591:(
1567:(
1542:(
1521:c
1514:u
1507:Ө
1494:)
1492:s
1485:c
1449:(
1435:(
1407:(
1383:.
1379::
1371::
1361::
1338:.
1334::
1326::
1291:(
1251:(
1233:(
1218:(
1198:(
1182:(
1159:(
1137:(
1099:(
1077:(
1060:(
1035:(
1012:(
984:|
958:(
940:(
920:(
873:(
848:(
805:(
734:(
690:.
582:.
448:.
424:.
314::
198:·
192:·
184:·
177:·
171:·
165:·
159:·
154:(
84:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
