Knowledge

Talk:Rogue Planet (Star Trek: Enterprise)

Source đź“ť

568: 502: 285: 233: 358: 327: 492: 438: 468: 191: 247: 222: 344: 841:
did not follow until three weeks later on March 20, 2002. Other sources mention the problems the series had in general, inadequate publicity, episodes being preempted for sports, and frequent reruns. That all add up to this being one of the lowest rated episodes of the season (possibly the lowest but
605:
That older version of the article had history back to 2005. Maybe at some point the edit histories will be merged, maybe it isn't worth the hassle. For most of its existence the article contained little more than a plot section and an Infobox. I made only a few very minor changes to the plot section,
903:
in plain English. Trekweb was used carefully and deliberately in a strictly limited way, no opinion or interpretation. Using Trekweb helped to avoid any mistakes or misinterpretation that might have otherwise inadvertently resulted from an editor attempting to translate the Nielsen ratings list into
798:
based on an article from TheFutonCritic but that site is excluded from the Internet archive and they don't provide their own archives back that far, so I was unable to find a copy of that original report, and I cannot be sure if TrekWeb is repeating commentary from TheFutonCritic or adding it's own.
746:
That should help fill in some of the gaps I felt were missing. It talks about the difficulty of showing a planet without a sun to light it, the challenge of shooting in the darkness on the surface, and Marvin Rush even gets a mention. It also mentions some of the creature design, the boar-like
609:
The original version of this page was swapped out and replaced with the new Draft. In the process some of the some comments I made on the article talk page were also swapped out, but some of them are still broadly relevant so I'm going to repeat them
153: 762:
I have added the VFX information to the Production section. I think that now there is nothing obviously missing from the article and that most things you could reasonably expect to find in a TV episode article are covered. --
664:
I tried to find details about what it was like to do an episode in the mostly in the dark, it seemed like a particularly unusual aspect of this episode. While I did find some comments about the dank conditions on
904:
understandable meaningful prose. The upstream primary source of the information is the Nielsen ratings, Trekweb was merely an extra reference to make it easier for editors and readers to make sense of it all. --
923:
The talk page header above includes a request to include a picture. I think the article would be best improved by an image of the woman Archer sees, also referred to as The Wraith, portrayed by Stephanie
803:
represented a 63% decline since the pilot episode "Broken Bow". They also explained that evening many sci-fi and genre shows were preempted or repeated, so among genre shows Smallville finished first,
577: 478: 44: 147: 1051: 818:
Even if we don't include the overnight ratings (because they're confusing) it might still be possible to include some of this commentary to give the final ratings numbers more context. --
940: 258:. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the 1091: 786:) Survivor was the big show of the night (moved to Wednesday because of college basketball). TrekWeb noted the overnight rating put the episode slightly below the episode 927: 675:
set in a mostly dark region of space. Maybe the dark setting wasn't so unusual, and this episode only really used the Rogue Planet concept as incidental background. --
783:
I've already added the ratings (final weekly ratings) to the article but I've also found the overnight ratings. The preliminary Nielsen ratings were 4.9/7 (zap2it
1081: 552: 668:
unfortunately I haven't been able to find more Production information about filming a dark episode, didn't find anything from Allan Kroeker or D.P. Marvin Rush.
1096: 1041: 933:, but if readers have not seen the episode I believe it is the most part of the episode and essential to readers fully understanding the episode. Other images 900:
In case anyone queries the use of Trekweb as a reference I want to preemptively state clearly now that Trekweb was restating the facts of the Nielsen listings
558: 259: 254: 227: 1086: 1066: 1061: 428: 418: 79: 1101: 168: 1071: 135: 524: 309: 85: 1076: 1014: 991: 948: 868: 861: 843: 838: 819: 748: 717: 676: 528: 380: 24: 1056: 905: 882: 764: 691: 645: 614: 404: 784: 969: 129: 966: 1046: 796: 791: 857: 515: 473: 125: 963: 842:
the differences between the overnight ratings and the final ratings has made it difficult for me to confirm that for sure). --
804: 376: 365: 332: 232: 99: 30: 1010: 865: 834: 787: 375:-related topics on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the 104: 20: 175: 1036: 74: 666: 202: 881:
I'm still undecided about adding a bit more context to the Ratings. I may revisit this at some point in the future. --
735: 812: 65: 672: 450: 141: 303: 712:. No real relevance to this episode though, except maybe to show the increasing difficulty of doing anything in 690:
Really if more Production information of any kind can be found and added to the article that would be great. --
1018: 952: 721: 995: 945: 942: 937: 925: 872: 847: 823: 752: 680: 886: 695: 618: 973: 909: 768: 740: 649: 109: 635: 208: 299: 1022: 999: 977: 956: 913: 890: 876: 851: 827: 772: 756: 725: 699: 684: 653: 622: 190: 161: 55: 901: 709: 70: 790:, and left Rogue Planet "the lowest overnight rating that the new series has generated" to date. 602:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Rogue_Planet_(Star_Trek:_Enterprise)&oldid=1019863521
983: 507: 51: 987: 934: 520: 947:
are interesting but I don't think any of those are essential to explaining the story. --
567: 343: 930: 410: 1030: 1009:
Andre Bormanis responded to criticism of the scientific basis for Rogue Planet in an
501: 929:
This would a need to be a screen capture from the episode and as such would be a
523:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can 600:
This episode article from 2021 is based on a version that existed previously.
497: 284: 833:
The irregular scheduling can't have helped much either, the previous episode
371: 811:
was rated above Enterprise (some other show I'd never even heard of called
747:
creature, and the wraith. Not enough time to do it properly now though. --
437: 357: 326: 519:, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Knowledge articles about 808: 736:"Behind the Scenes: ENTERPRISE Visual Effects Ronald B. Moore and Team" 628:
So apparently there's a template to request a history merge, here goes:
491: 467: 246: 221: 369:, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to all 413:
in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
409:
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the
184: 15: 864:"seem to suffer from the period of reruns directly previous." 671:
I was reminded that Star Trek Voyager did an episode called
566: 436: 283: 379:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the 962:
Web Archive copy of StarTrek.com list of publicity images
986:
includes an artist's impression image of a rogue planet
611: 601: 294: 160: 795:TrekWeb also commented on the final weekly ratings 557:This article has not yet received a rating on the 1052:B-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 606:so credit to all the editors who came before. 527:. To improve this article, please refer to the 174: 8: 1092:Unknown-importance Episode coverage articles 268:Knowledge:WikiProject Articles for creation 744:. Vol. 3, no. 7. November 2002. pp. 50–57. 462: 321: 271:Template:WikiProject Articles for creation 252:This article was reviewed by member(s) of 216: 716:that hasn't already been done before. -- 990:but I decided against including it. -- 464: 323: 218: 188: 1082:Unknown-importance television articles 708:was used in the original series novel 7: 1097:Episode coverage task force articles 1042:AfC submissions by date/09 July 2021 513:This article is within the scope of 363:This article is within the scope of 25:Rogue Planet (Star Trek: Enterprise) 965:particularly this one of the wraith 799:TrekWeb noted the final ratings of 207:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 411:project-independent quality rating 14: 1087:C-Class Episode coverage articles 1067:Star Trek articles needing images 1062:Low-importance Star Trek articles 255:WikiProject Articles for creation 537:Knowledge:WikiProject Television 500: 490: 466: 356: 342: 325: 245: 231: 220: 189: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 1102:WikiProject Television articles 939:or the bioluminescant creatures 936:such as the Rogue Planet itself 578:the Episode coverage task force 540:Template:WikiProject Television 445:An editor has requested that a 423:This article has been rated as 389:Knowledge:WikiProject Star Trek 292:This article was accepted from 1072:WikiProject Star Trek articles 815:was in distant fifth place). 392:Template:WikiProject Star Trek 1: 801:3.3/5 and 4.7 million viewers 575:This article is supported by 42:Put new text under old text. 1023:13:31, 3 February 2022 (UTC) 1077:C-Class television articles 957:00:59, 20 August 2021 (UTC) 813:Glory Days (2002 TV series) 726:00:42, 20 August 2021 (UTC) 298:on 9 July 2021 by reviewer 50:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 1118: 1057:B-Class Star Trek articles 1011:interview with TrekWeb.com 837:aired on February 22, and 757:05:21, 27 April 2022 (UTC) 654:13:48, 14 April 2023 (UTC) 559:project's importance scale 429:project's importance scale 1000:18:50, 26 June 2022 (UTC) 891:20:33, 11 July 2021 (UTC) 877:01:50, 27 June 2021 (UTC) 852:15:41, 15 June 2021 (UTC) 700:20:33, 11 July 2021 (UTC) 623:20:33, 11 July 2021 (UTC) 574: 556: 485: 444: 422: 408: 351: 291: 240: 215: 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 1047:Accepted AfC submissions 828:00:10, 7 June 2021 (UTC) 685:15:01, 6 June 2021 (UTC) 596:Previous article history 978:04:40, 4 May 2022 (UTC) 914:02:50, 8 May 2022 (UTC) 773:02:50, 8 May 2022 (UTC) 741:Star Trek: The Magazine 968:might be suitable. -- 571: 516:WikiProject Television 441: 288: 197:This article is rated 75:avoid personal attacks 570: 531:for the type of work. 440: 366:WikiProject Star Trek 287: 265:Articles for creation 262:for more information. 228:Articles for creation 100:Neutral point of view 1037:C-Class AfC articles 105:No original research 543:television articles 525:join the discussion 521:television programs 733:Found a source: 710:Planet of Judgment 572: 442: 395:Star Trek articles 289: 203:content assessment 86:dispute resolution 47: 984:Knowledge Commons 704:The concept of a 593: 592: 589: 588: 585: 584: 508:Television portal 461: 460: 457: 456: 320: 319: 316: 315: 183: 182: 66:Assume good faith 43: 1109: 988:File:Planemo.png 944:or the gastropod 745: 640: 634: 545: 544: 541: 538: 535: 529:style guidelines 510: 505: 504: 494: 487: 486: 481: 479:Episode coverage 470: 463: 453:to this article. 397: 396: 393: 390: 387: 360: 353: 352: 347: 346: 345: 340: 337: 329: 322: 297: 276: 275: 272: 269: 266: 249: 242: 241: 236: 235: 234: 224: 217: 200: 194: 193: 185: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 16: 1117: 1116: 1112: 1111: 1110: 1108: 1107: 1106: 1027: 1026: 1007: 921: 781: 734: 662: 638: 632: 598: 542: 539: 536: 533: 532: 506: 499: 476: 394: 391: 388: 385: 384: 341: 338: 335: 300:Robert McClenon 293: 273: 270: 267: 264: 263: 230: 201:on Knowledge's 198: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 1115: 1113: 1105: 1104: 1099: 1094: 1089: 1084: 1079: 1074: 1069: 1064: 1059: 1054: 1049: 1044: 1039: 1029: 1028: 1015:109.79.172.124 1006: 1003: 992:109.77.192.135 981: 980: 949:109.78.204.110 931:non-free image 920: 917: 898: 897: 896: 895: 894: 893: 869:109.79.176.128 844:109.79.175.162 820:109.78.208.111 780: 777: 776: 775: 749:109.76.143.155 731: 730: 729: 728: 718:109.78.204.110 677:109.78.208.111 661: 658: 657: 656: 630: 629: 604: 597: 594: 591: 590: 587: 586: 583: 582: 573: 563: 562: 555: 549: 548: 546: 512: 511: 495: 483: 482: 471: 459: 458: 455: 454: 443: 433: 432: 425:Low-importance 421: 415: 414: 407: 401: 400: 398: 361: 349: 348: 339:Low‑importance 330: 318: 317: 314: 313: 290: 280: 279: 277: 250: 238: 237: 225: 213: 212: 206: 195: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1114: 1103: 1100: 1098: 1095: 1093: 1090: 1088: 1085: 1083: 1080: 1078: 1075: 1073: 1070: 1068: 1065: 1063: 1060: 1058: 1055: 1053: 1050: 1048: 1045: 1043: 1040: 1038: 1035: 1034: 1032: 1025: 1024: 1020: 1016: 1012: 1004: 1002: 1001: 997: 993: 989: 985: 979: 975: 971: 967: 964: 961: 960: 959: 958: 954: 950: 946: 943: 941: 938: 935: 932: 928: 926: 918: 916: 915: 911: 907: 906:109.78.206.86 902: 892: 888: 884: 883:109.79.81.165 880: 879: 878: 874: 870: 866: 863: 859: 855: 854: 853: 849: 845: 840: 836: 832: 831: 830: 829: 825: 821: 816: 814: 810: 806: 802: 797: 793: 792: 789: 785: 778: 774: 770: 766: 765:109.78.206.86 761: 760: 759: 758: 754: 750: 743: 742: 737: 727: 723: 719: 715: 711: 707: 703: 702: 701: 697: 693: 692:109.79.81.165 689: 688: 687: 686: 682: 678: 674: 669: 667: 659: 655: 651: 647: 646:109.76.202.35 643: 642: 641: 637: 636:History merge 627: 626: 625: 624: 620: 616: 615:109.79.81.165 612: 607: 603: 595: 580: 579: 569: 565: 564: 560: 554: 551: 550: 547: 530: 526: 522: 518: 517: 509: 503: 498: 496: 493: 489: 488: 484: 480: 475: 472: 469: 465: 452: 448: 439: 435: 434: 430: 426: 420: 417: 416: 412: 406: 403: 402: 399: 382: 378: 374: 373: 368: 367: 362: 359: 355: 354: 350: 334: 331: 328: 324: 311: 308: 305: 301: 296: 286: 282: 281: 278: 261: 257: 256: 251: 248: 244: 243: 239: 229: 226: 223: 219: 214: 210: 204: 196: 192: 187: 186: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 1008: 982: 970:109.79.64.54 922: 899: 862:Rogue Planet 839:Rogue Planet 817: 800: 794: 782: 739: 732: 713: 706:Rogue Planet 705: 670: 663: 631: 608: 599: 576: 514: 446: 424: 377:project page 370: 364: 306: 274:AfC articles 260:project page 253: 209:WikiProjects 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 807:second and 148:free images 31:not a forum 1031:Categories 805:Dark Angel 534:Television 474:Television 381:discussion 295:this draft 714:Star Trek 386:Star Trek 372:Star Trek 333:Star Trek 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 1005:Bormanis 858:Detained 310:contribs 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 924:Niznik. 919:Picture 809:Charmed 779:Ratings 447:picture 427:on the 336:B‑class 199:C-class 154:WP refs 142:scholar 835:Fusion 788:Fusion 610:below. 205:scale. 126:Google 1013:. -- 856:Both 673:Night 451:added 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 1019:talk 996:talk 974:talk 953:talk 910:talk 887:talk 873:talk 860:and 848:talk 824:talk 769:talk 753:talk 722:talk 696:talk 681:talk 665:set, 660:Dark 650:talk 619:talk 304:talk 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 867:-- 644:-- 613:-- 553:??? 449:be 419:Low 176:TWL 1033:: 1021:) 998:) 976:) 955:) 912:) 889:) 875:) 850:) 826:) 771:) 755:) 738:. 724:) 698:) 683:) 652:) 639:}} 633:{{ 621:) 477:: 312:). 156:) 54:; 1017:( 994:( 972:( 951:( 908:( 885:( 871:( 846:( 822:( 767:( 751:( 720:( 694:( 679:( 648:( 617:( 581:. 561:. 431:. 405:B 383:. 307:· 302:( 211:: 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 58:.

Index

talk page
Rogue Planet (Star Trek: Enterprise)
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL

content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Articles for creation
WikiProject icon
WikiProject Articles for creation

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑