Talk:Rachel Reeves - Knowledge (XXG)

1065:

fact very different to the type of sources you are using. It is a neutral organisation, which abides by the editors code of practice and by Press Complaints Commission standards. Given Reeves' role in shadow treasury matters her husband's work is all the more relevant, though it would still merit some mention even if she was a backbench MP with no shadow treasury role. The material I removed which you had added was either of self-published sources, and Labour Party blogs, both of which should be avoided. Finally, making COI accusations is a very serious affair you should be assuming good faith about other editors so I strongly suggest you retract that allegation as I've edited here for 5 years with an unblemished record.--

2533:, mention of her appointment and gender is if anything more prominent. It also appears to be a topic of much discussion both on social and traditional media, and so is obviously one of the most significant factors in the eyes of those minded to engage with/regarding her. Personally, I don't care much what gender she is as long as her policies are good, but that doesn't mean it's not an important historical event and one of the most significant aspects of her notability. I'm going to leave this a little bit for you to respond before I make an edit to reverse this, but I think it's important this issue is addressed soon, as it feels like the gap where the information was is harming the overall credibility of the article. 545: 524: 718: 2709:

from positions of power and why it is simultaneously notable when a woman holds a position previously held exclusively by men, but that it's also important to view office holders primarily by their roles and actions in official contexts. It seems this is generally understood so I see no need. Since we have consensus from everyone except Defacto at this point I am going have a run at putting it back in further down the intro without introducing an entire paragraph for it, unless anyone else has an objection.

1556:, the edited verbatim report of parliamentary proceedings, and the public UK Parliament profile for every MP, including their Hansard and parliamentary service record. Any Hansard contributions from Reeves (one occasion to date since her appointment) are published online with a direct link to her UK Parliament profile. The official profile confirms "she currently undertakes the role of Shadow Minister for the Cabinet Office and Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster." On 28 April 2020, both the 374: 1617:

website (parliament.uk) should not be confused with Hansard (hansard.parliament.uk) although they share the same domain of parliament.uk, and I highly doubt the reliability of the former. There have been cases showing that parliament.uk does not reflect the reality, for instance the cabinet listed in parliament.uk does not follow the ministerial ranking released by gov.uk. I believe when the primary source and a secondary source contradict, the former should be adopted.

634: 354: 613: 2762:

energy to unpack and evaluate, and then to communicate that evaluation such that we have something like a common understanding. In theory this could go on indefinitely, depending on the depth of argument you want to go into for each piece of text marked with a WP on this site. Since I am trying to launch a startup at the moment I don't have hours and hours to do that and my mental energy is at least somewhat precious.

1178:: "During the series, which will be broadcast over a week, Lawson's guests and opponents will include the shadow Cabinet minister, Rachel Reeves, who is a former British girls under-14 champion; former Soviet dissident and Israeli politician Natan Sharansky; writer and former homeless alcoholic John Healy; Women's World Champion Hou Yifan from China – and Lennox Lewis, who I am told is a good club player." 2507: 427: 406: 292: 264: 437: 644: 233: 1023:

biographies of living people, and I can find no reliable, verifiable information on the web to back the given citation up. Even if the information about her husband is correct, I am not sure why the extra information then added about his person is relevant to Reeves biography page? This just does not seem to meet the guidelines of biographies of a living person:

749: 2343: 2914:, I think it was the incorrect move to place it in the first sentence in the lead as was done a few days ago but I think a small mention in the second para is absolutely fine (which was the case for most of the last week). This has been covered more than enough in reliable sources and has been one of the biggest stories since the election: 1968:, are also listed on their UK Parliament profiles. Each MP's individual parliamentary offices and poltiical parties have confirmed the details with the parliamentary editors to create their official parliamentary profile, as previously discussed, including details of how each individual should be addressed inside and outside the 302: 1634:: Would you mind explaining why you find the UK Parliament website so inaccurate and unreliable? To all intents and purposes it is written by the same people (i.e. the parliamentary authorities) that compile Hansard, so I struggle to understand why there is such a marked difference between them. Thanks, 2810:

This whole thing is just making me tired and I'd rather be spending my time developing my app and engaging with potential investors. At some point later I might figure it's worth going back and trying to push for this article to be what everyone but you wants it to be but for now it doesn't seem like

2761:

I will try to debate this with you if you want but if we are trying to get 100% everyone agreeing you will need to give ground. Is that likely to happen? At the moment it feels like every time a point of debate is countered you will bring up a new one which will require expenditure of time and mental

1787:

I still hold my previous view. A shadow cabinet that corresponds to a government minister does not hold the minister's shadow title - they can have different portfolios. As regards the Channel 4 source, I reckon it is less preferred to than the Labour Party's official source for the same reason above

860:

Mike the biggest problem with this article is that its written as a party political intended to sell its subject, not as an encyclopedia biography, and who also it appears is its main author. There are also several other problems with this article but I'm confining myself to a fast reply here just to

2757:

You restored it to the version where you removed the status quo section. The status quo everyone else was happy with prior to your edit was the original with the final paragraph. I tried to compromise with you regarding this by moving the reference to gender further up so it was more of an aside and

2685:

Everyone above seems to disagree with you, so I'm not sure why you've removed it. I don't think anyone is suggesting "it really is the only notable thing about her" at all. For this reason, I don't think it was right to be in the first sentence of the lead as it was previously. The policy you quoted

1681:

Thanks for your reply. I hadn't realised that Hansard have its own specialist reporting team, but my point still stands that there is nothing particularly untrustworthy (as far as I know) about www.parliament.uk. I was not insinuating every British politician bio should follow it, I was only meaning

1128:

An ip editor has a bee in his/her bonnet about Reeves and chess. They have removed referenced information about Reeves' chess championship 3 times today, first (falsely) claiming that the references didn't support the content, and most recently by claiming that Reeves doesn't appear on the ECF list.

1022:

keeps adding back information on this page that I first removed because the link to information about her spouse linked to a page that contained no such information. The link that has replaced this is not what could be considered a hugely reliable source, especially considering the rules surrounding

1616:

I agree that Hansard is reliable (not as reliable as primary source if to be compared), but unfortunately there is no mention of Reeves as Shadow Minister of the Cabinet Office in any script in Hansard. Read the scripts, Rachel Reeves is only referred to as Rachel Reeves. The UK Parliament official

1423:

Hello, sadly I do not agree. There is a difference between Shadow Cabinet Office minister and Shadow Minister for the Cabinet Office, the former means any shadow minister that is shadowing the Cabinet Office whereas the latter is an official position. When Michael Gove did not have the Minister for

1108:

I have removed the reference to wedding cakes and flower arranging - I checked the Hansard record in the reference and from the context it was clearly a humorous comment in response to a comment by another MP about her own upcoming wedding that she was busy preparing for. As her wedding is now past

2843:

I have read it and it doesn't apply. I am very tired of your blocking of an edit everyone else wants while standing on your own interpretation of rules and allowing for no others, but I can see that right now attempting to reason with you is futile. You have said yourself that you have no hurry to

2765:

As you seem to have put a lot of effort into this and care a lot about it, I will try to make time to debate this when I have spare time. It's certainly an interesting topic in theory. Until then I would suggest we revert to the status quo version that included the original info, but since you are

1707:

I have to apologise for exaggerating the unreliability of parliament.uk - I acknowledge that it is an official and reliable source, too. My view is that parliament.uk has its own system of the politician profiles, for example they use Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Digital, Culture,

1082:

and the verdict is that the Marlborough News is a registered company run by professional jourmalists and entirely suitable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (and most certainly not a blog). I shall therefore be restoring the content and editors should refrain from removing it unless a differing consensus

1033:

I am happy for people to remove some links I added if they found these were not reliable, as happened. I was just trying to add references to sections that were poorly referenced or had requested a citation but I find it slightly perturbing that people are removing my links, giving the reason that

2708:

Personally I moved it up there from where it was previously as it only needed a couple of words in that context and avoid dedicating an entire section to it. There's a very long diatribe I could go on where I could talk about the reason why women have historically been disproportionately excluded

2638:

in the sense that while the gender of the position holder is particularly notable at this stage in history, it is probably not a fact that merits more than a passing mention, when the primary importance of this person is the office they hold, the power bestowed on them by that office, and what is

2582:

and one person who doesn't. It has frequently been the primary thing mentioned on her Instagram, for example, and referenced in many media articles. It's not so much another minister but the specific office of Chancellor of the Exchequer which, as has been noted, has been exclusively male for 708

1469:

As I am fairly sure that we aren't going to come to an agreement, may I suggest a compromise where we have 'Shadow Cabinet Office minister' in the infobox, without referring to a specific role as NYKTNE mentioned above? This way we could show that she still shadows the cabinet office, but doesn't

1064:

FYI I have made thousands of edits to Knowledge (XXG) so the percentage to this article is tiny. One reason I've had to spend more time than I'd like editing this page is to deal with various editors in the past adding material promotional in tone breaching NPOV. The Marlborough news source is in

2465:

Regardless of any claims about Astor as an individual, I do note that neither of the citations explicitly supports the claim that Reeves is a long-standing admirer. That seems to constitute original research, and is potentially libellous. Following the “be bold” principle, as well as the need to

1300:

A Google search for BWCA or British Women's Chess Association still returns nothing. The page you link to appears to be housed on a personal website of someone called Chris Ball. Is that you Blackberry? Keep on trying LOL No one is saying RR can't play chess well. But claiming to be a British

1659:

Hansard is managed by an independent 100-man team of professionals (i.e. Parliamentary Reporters), each of whom holds a Postgraduate Diploma in Parliamentary Reporting, while parliament.uk is not. On a side note, if all British politician articles have to follow parliament.uk, there is a lot to

2428:

It's a very strong assertion to say Nancy Astor was a Nazi Sympathiser, particularly without a clear reference stating so. She, like many Britons, Europeans and Americans, was in favour of appeasement. Such statements also don't address the huge amount of effort she put into supporting her

2633:

and thanks for your input! Prior to your comment I made an edit to reduce the length of the passage on gender so that it does not take up undue space, and elevated it to the top of the article to avoid having to repeat information later in the lead. Hopefully this satisfies the spirit of

1340:

hi, i think the quote about Labour representing people in/or out-of-work is not so useful. I would prefer to see reference to 2015 election pledge to reinstate the contributory principle to benefits, a huge policy change i think. Shiv Malik of Guardian, reference no32, has specialized on

2206:. There is far more evidence for than against (various articles from reliable sources, the UK Parliament website, two Channel 4 News bulletins and an episode of Question Time versus a consise and incomplete description on the Labour Party's website). Definitely time to add to infobox. 1041:

has made a great many revisions on this page, which makes me consider some sort of COI here. Would appreciate other users who have edited the page in the past offering opinion. I'd rather not get into some sort of editing war but I feel these revisions are breaking guidelines.

2006:. It lists Hayes as a junior Shadow Minister in the "Cabinet Office" team under Reeves, although she is the only one directly referred to as having specific "Cabinet Office" portfolio responsibilities. Hayes' parliamentary profile confirms she is the junior minister and not of 1029:

Anyone may delete biography-related material that is unsourced, poorly-sourced, or otherwise unreasonable for a biography. This includes contact information, and also includes sensitive personal matters such as religion and sexuality (unless relevant and verifiable). "

1273:: "When Rachel Reeves was helping out in Malcolm Pein's Chess Shop, Jimmy Adams invited her, a talented junior player at the time, to be photographed. I took her to a café in Bute Street and the picture duly appeared on the front cover of CHESS." I suggest that you 3041:

The problem with 'being the adult in the room' here is it seems to imply that adults should completely relinquish control in any case to people who according to the implication of the rule are behaving childishly, and leave them to create truth on their own terms

2742:

for inspiration. It gives seven things not to mention in articles about women in science, to avoid gender bias. Amongst them are "The fact that she’s a woman" and "How she’s the “first woman to…". Why wouldn't that apply to this article about a politician too? --

1564:

note Reeves as the 'Shadow Minister for the Cabinet Office and Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster' again. The physical printed Hansard record would also indicate her appointment to both positions. The official parliamentary record should be conclusive evidence.

3116:

Hi DeFacto. It's ok, I don't think it's something that belongs on Rachel Reeves, and it looks like we're all good here and seem to have an edit that everyone agrees with. I'll probably raise the potential rules issue as topic to chat about in the tea room. :) -

1364:, I shall now open a discussion in the talk page. My view is that the UK Parliament should not be deemed as the official source for the Shadow Cabinet, the Labour Party should as the Shadow Cabinet was not announced through parliament.uk/. As stated on the 2277:: I have reverted my edit until we can come to a conclusion, be it here or at DRN. Sorry for jumping the gun, we had a weak (2 vs 1) consensus to change it, but I appreciate it was probably the wrong thing to do in hindsight. Again, apologies 3077:

Regardless, this is probably not a discussion that belongs in Rachel Reeves. Perhaps there is an alternative forum you can suggest to a Knowledge (XXG) newbie such as myself where I could discuss this in further detail with myself and/or

1497:

To indicate that she is attached to the shadow Cabinet Office, Shadow Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster has provided sufficient information as Shadow Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster is already a Shadow Cabinet Office minister.

2583:

years -- a very long time for something that's theoretically a 50/50 chance every five or so years. Again, regarding consensus, what exactly are you waiting to see? It feels very much like there is one across many different channels.

1224:

does not include RR's name. Is this an oversight or their part or is this another myth like the famous JPR Williams being Junior Wimbledon Champion in 1966 one, which has been regularly repeated by 'reliable' sources for decades?

1172:: "Inspired by a teacher at primary school, Reeves first picked up a pawn when she was seven. No mean player, she was national under-14 champion (she thinks her Dad has the trophy somewhere) and can still play to a high level." 3221: 2800:

Yeah, I kinda knew that would be the position. It seems like the spirit of the rule is that the status quo is the position of the article where lots of people were happy with it and it represented the general feeling about

844:

It seems to me that adding these "unnecessary" tags is unhelpful to the reader. But I may be wrong. Let's discuss it here. I think there's been too many reversions, and a discussion is better than the existing edit war.

1184:: "One of my five opponents, Rachel Reeves - the former national girls' under-14 chess champion, now better known as Labour's Shadow Work and Pensions Secretary - got a little cross about this process during our game." 950:

tag, but no one has yet suggested evidence for the other two tags. I've missed the policy that says that disputed tags should remain on an article pending a talk page discussion, but I'll obviously abide by policy.

3059:

Does the above seem like an accurate summation of where we're at? Are you aware of any discussions around this point? I shall probably look to raise this unless there's any reason you can think why this is not an

153: 2689:

As the fact that she is the first female in one of the highest offices in the government, and that this has been covered significantly in reliable sources - it should definitely be in the lead. In the case of

1301:

Champion at chess implies you won one of the titles awarded in the official British Championships organized by the then BCF (now ECF), not some spurious feminist self-help group which BWCA appears have been. (

595: 3236: 388: 2308:

should be primarily discussions and, if necessary, soliciting outside opinions - straw poll should be the final resort. Thanks again and I look forward to reaching a consensus with a third opinion on DRN.

3271: 585: 1551:

is published by the parliamentary authorities, involving individual MPs and their offices, political parties and parliamentary staff. The website publishes the official online public access database for

1242:

Oh and about BWCA. Try doing a Google search on it. It returns nothing. Doesn't exist now and if it ever existed at all was never significant enough to leave any trace of its being on the Internet. (

996:

Thanks for that. It still isn't much use for claims about a residence though due to the self published aspect, there have been more than enough controversies about politicians' homes in recent years.--

2254:

Although I appreciate our discussion being characterised by calmness and respect, I think you are frankly being arbitrary by applying what you deem right. I will be requesting dispute resolution on

3216: 2896:

That doesn't seem like a particularly reasonable assumption given the context. Literally everyone else in the conversation has said they want the reference to the office holder's gender to remain.

561: 1396:

this morning) have reported her as 'Shadow Cabinet Office minister' without mentioning her other job title, and reliable secondary sources are normally preferred to a primary source. Thanks,

3231: 3176: 2786:

There is no hurry to declare a 'consensus'. Typically we'd wait until a couple of weeks of no contributions to the discussion, and then if there isn't unanimity, decide what to do next. --

363: 274: 2657:, I think we need to convince ourselves that "it really is the only notable thing about her" if we are to keep it. I don't think that it is, so I do not support this being in the lead. -- 3102:

policy? If that is the case, then you could take it up at that policy's talkpage. Otherwise, you'll need to explin, with diffs and or quotse, in more detail what you are referring to. --

2783:

In researching Wiki's policies, guidelines, etc. with respect to this, each time I've found something relevant I've brought it here to add to the discussion. That's how discussion works.

3266: 3038:

3) Once someone correctly makes the point it is not status quo, point to the next section of the rules which suggests being the 'adult in the room' and walking away regarding status quo

739: 2014:

was. Analysis of the missing information for other Shadow Cabinet members on the party website evidences Reeves holds this post and Hayes is the junior Shadow Cabinet Office Minister.

1079:

In order to avoid any doubt on this matter I've asked for the input of those with more expertise on these matters at the reliable sources noticeboard. The discussion can be found here

2578:

Exactly what would establish your view that it constitutes consensus? Someone else put it there and it seemed to belong to me, so there appear to be two people so far who think it is

1181: 2398: 2002:

detailing the complete "new fronbench team", the list is more concise again to not include the missing titles mentioned previously. The only exception is Rayner also being listed as

552: 529: 383: 278: 212: 1196:: "Reeves, who comes from a relatively humble background, went to a south London comprehensive, where she excelled at maths and became the British under-14 girls chess champion." 3226: 2807:

I know you're not going to be in any hurry to change by agreeing with everyone else because right now you get to have the article the way you want it and everyone else doesn't.

2597:

I can't think of a good reason not to include it in the lead, it is obviously a very significant event and has been covered more than enough in reliable sources to be included

2110:

in live television interviews. Reeves herself has provided clear evidence of holding this position by answering to this title and not challenging it. The best example saw her

805: 3296: 2485:

Rachel campaigns to have investment taxed to an equivalent level as earned income. Do her principles extend to taxing profit on owned property assets to the same equivalent

2780:

The original status quo was the state of the article before that bit about being the first woman chancellor was added to the lead. That was the bold edit being challenged.

2111: 1763: 1561: 3241: 795: 2556:. And even if it wasn't, I do not think that becoming another woman minister in 2024 really competes with taking the world by storm in 1979 by becoming the first woman 1393: 147: 3306: 1998:. The authenticity and weight of the UK Parliament profiles, compared to the Labour Party's own website, has been previously challenged by NYKTNE. However, in the 217: 1866:

Whereas I really understand of your points, I still can't agree to your view. My opinion remains that titles of an organisation should follow the primary source.

1825:. In addition, there are plenty more RS that mention 'Shadow Cabinet Office minister' (although I do appreciate what NYKTNE said on the matter above), including 771: 3187: 1109:

and there is no indication that she has a broader interest in wedding cakes beyond her own wedding, it seems clear that this information is no longer relevant.

942:

hasn't added the three tags listed above, so I don't plan to solicit his involvement either way. My dispute is a narrow one, focussing on the three tags above.

700: 506: 79: 3291: 3301: 3206: 2131: 1190:: "Andrew Sparrow profiles the Shadow Chief Secretary to the Treasury – the one-time under-14 UK girls chess champion who may just checkmate the coalition." 830:

This is a marker to allow discussion on tags for this article. I think the notability tag is reasonable, but I see no evidence to suggest that the article:

3256: 3177:

https://news.sky.com/story/rachel-reeves-everything-you-need-to-know-about-the-former-chess-champion-vying-to-be-the-uks-first-female-chancellor-13059462}}

1913: 1532: 496: 200:) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or 2758:

used up less space. You didn't appear to be happy with this anyway and others have indicated they prefered it in the status quo version, as it was before.

2694:, her position/accomplishments are mentioned first, followed by a mention of her being the first female PM later on. I think this is the correct approach 2367: 2360: 2350: 1830: 3281: 690: 320: 192: 2046:

in official party press releases on their website. As shown with Hayes to Reeves, each of them were supporting and junior to Trickett in shadowing the

1729:

No bother, there will always be discrepancies between sources, and they can't all be wrong. (Although some might be more 'right' than others!) Cheers,

762: 723: 1388:: I think it would be sensible to add her other title back in now, as in addition to the UK Parliament website, various reliable sources (including 2910:

I have to say I don't see anyone else who has an issue with this since it was added on 6 July. I don't think we need unanimity at all here. As per

85: 3286: 3261: 3246: 1826: 1287: 1209: 1160:: "A former under-14 UK girls chess champion, she is intellectually self-confident and has occasional flashes of temper, according to colleagues." 938:

added the notability tag which is still on the article, and which I do not dispute. I agree that it should stay there pending any discussion. But

1026:"Must be very neutral in tone and contents, and written with regard to the highest quality of fairness and sourcing, beyond the normal standard. 666: 471: 324: 3165: 1557: 1536: 1169: 1154:: "...Rachel Reeves, the Shadow Chief Secretary to the Treasury and a former under-14s UK girls chess champion, has challenged him to a game." 1544: 1175: 44: 2686:

continues: "Otherwise start with her own position or accomplishments, and mention the fact that she is a woman afterwards if it is notable."

2611:

I also agree that this should be included in the lead as significant, as many reliable sources covering this deem it noteworthy to mention.

544: 523: 3004:, it's not so much what my view of the meaning of consensus is, but the meaning in Knowledge (XXG) policy. And one thing that says that it 2486: 2144:

Therefore, I believe this evidence resolves the matter and we should permanently add Reeves' official title to her Knowledge (XXG) infobox.

1921:

rank as the listings are briefer to not include all of the official positions held by the Shadow Cabinet and wider Shadow frontbench team.

1322: 1302: 1243: 1226: 30: 2950:

I am a bit baffled this is still a discussion to be frank but I'll give it a day or so to see if any other editors wish to add anything.

319:, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Knowledge (XXG)'s articles about people. All interested editors are invited to 3276: 3251: 3211: 2286: 2236: 2215: 1846: 1762:

Hi everyone, Reeves was now been referred to as the SMftCO in multiple interviews, including by Jon Snow as the interviewer in a live

1738: 1691: 1643: 1594: 1479: 1405: 328: 2844:

achieve consensus so what would be the point of attempting to get you to a point that by your own admission you don't want to be at.

2448:, which has for a long time stated that "Astor has been criticised for her antisemitism and sympathetic view of National Socialism". 657: 618: 465: 455: 411: 315: 269: 99: 2564:

one of the most important pieces of content in this article, then fair enough, we should add it to the lead. Let's wait and see. --

2467: 1969: 1932: 1139: 1049: 2731:

is that until there is a consensus for the inclusion of the new content, then we do not include it. I introduced the argument from

1834: 104: 20: 74: 1938: 244: 3188:

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/who-is-rachel-reeves-chancellor-labour-general-election-2024-profile-b1027778.html}}

770:

and related articles on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

557: 3008:, is the result of a vote. But rather than me giving my interpretation of the policy on this, why not read it for yourself, 168: 65: 1105:

It's hardly significant information anyway, but does she enjoy them (as stated) or make them? 14:56, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

1365: 649: 135: 1424:

the Cabinet Office title before the February reshuffle, multiple reports also referred him as Cabinet Office minister.

2522: 2304:

Thank you for your revert. This is a kind and noble action that not every editor can do. But I want to point out that

2031: 1283: 1205: 1157: 1142:: "Here are 10 interesting facts about the Labour shadow cabinet member. 1) She was the UK U14 girls chess champion." 975:

Google Plus is known to vet the identities of notable people. Therefore a Google Plus profile counts as a verifiable

1270: 201: 109: 1964:

All of the titles that are currently not included on the Labour Party's Shadow Cabinet web page, except Rayner's

2553: 1129:

Reeves was U14 British Women's Chess Association (BWCA) champion. See the following reliable secondary sources:

738: 717: 2039: 1900: 1326: 129: 2490: 2195: 1306: 1247: 1230: 250: 3166:

https://www.itv.com/news/2024-07-05/honour-of-my-life-reeves-becomes-uks-first-female-chancellor-in-800-years

2466:

remove potentially libellous material from biographies of living persons, I am going to remove that content.

1145: 1368:, Jon Trickett held the title Shadow Minister for the Cabinet Office, meanwhile Rachel Reeves now does not. 1262: 1088: 1070: 1001: 2911: 2879: 2732: 2654: 2471: 2055: 1815:

Channel 4 News is as reliable a source as any and there is also another mention on C4 News from yesterday:

1045: 2282: 2232: 2211: 1948: 1842: 1816: 1734: 1687: 1639: 1590: 1475: 1401: 1346: 1278: 1200: 125: 3099: 3009: 1166:: "They include shadow cabinet minister Rachel Reeves, the former British girls under-14 chess champion." 55: 2969: 2955: 2927: 2919: 2699: 2602: 2151: 1771: 1570: 1274: 1053: 921: 894: 665:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

560:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

1999: 861:

address the tagging issue you object to. I'd ask you to notify the orginal person to place the tag on,

70: 885: 2616: 1187: 956: 850: 469:, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's 211:. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to 175: 2766:

claiming the status quo is something other than it is that seems something of an impasse right now.

865:

of this discussion and I hope you will re-instate the tag as is normal while we discuss it here. -

232: 161: 3103: 3013: 2883: 2830: 2787: 2744: 2672: 2658: 2565: 2430: 1110: 979:

source and can be used for non-selfserving, non-cntentious information about the subject herself.

3122: 3085: 2941: 2901: 2849: 2816: 2771: 2714: 2644: 2588: 2538: 2075: 2071: 1221: 1151: 1084: 1066: 1038: 1019: 997: 215:.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see 1148:: "Far more interesting, however, is that she was also once under-14 UK girls chess champion..." 1080: 902: 373: 208: 2529:. I don't see you could make this case, not least because looking at similar articles, such as 2067: 1682:

that there is no reason to discount it against any other comparable, reliable source. Regards,

3107: 3017: 2887: 2834: 2791: 2748: 2691: 2676: 2662: 2569: 2530: 2511: 2454: 2434: 2299: 2278: 2249: 2228: 2207: 2139: 1886: 1857: 1838: 1766:

interview on 7 May 2020. Are you happy for me to add her position now to her profile infobox?

1753: 1730: 1702: 1683: 1654: 1635: 1611: 1586: 1522: 1492: 1471: 1418: 1397: 1342: 1114: 51: 3030: 2635: 2579: 2526: 2525:

as the first female to hold the post in its 708-year history is not sufficiently notable for

1133: 931: 2965: 2951: 2923: 2915: 2871: 2804:

You're saying it's not that, it's what you want it to be, which I figured would be the case.

2695: 2630: 2598: 2314: 2263: 2203: 2147: 2127: 1891:

Friends, we have provided clear evidence of Reeves' position and this needs to be resolved:

1871: 1861: 1810: 1793: 1782: 1767: 1713: 1665: 1622: 1607: 1582: 1566: 1503: 1429: 1373: 1361: 943: 917: 862: 767: 442: 307: 2826: 2728: 2305: 2255: 1531:

Thank you for starting this talk. I disagree with not listing both of Reeves' positions as

947: 141: 2739: 2626: 2612: 984: 952: 866: 846: 2444:

The appropriate place to make that argument would be on the talk page for the article on

1163: 3035:

2) If someone disagrees, erroneously claim your change is the status quo and mark it so

3026:

I have. It appears to have an issue where the rules can be abused in the following way:

2119: 2047: 2007: 1918: 754: 353: 3200: 3154: 3118: 3081: 3001: 2937: 2897: 2845: 2812: 2767: 2724: 2710: 2640: 2584: 2549: 2534: 2521:. I noticed that you expressed your belief that Reeves' appointment to the office of 2518: 2354: 2027: 1922: 1908: 1540: 449: 24: 2082:. As well as Cat Smith, each of these individuals have also been referred to as the 2450: 2095: 2091: 2087: 2019: 2011: 1991: 1987: 1981: 1917:, as listed. However, this does not officially confirm Reeves is not the SMftCO of 1749: 1526: 1460: 633: 612: 1389: 916:

who has edited no other articles on Knowledge (XXG), looks like a COI to me. ––

2445: 2310: 2274: 2259: 1977: 1943: 1882: 1867: 1806: 1789: 1757: 1724: 1709: 1676: 1661: 1631: 1618: 1518: 1499: 1464: 1441: 1425: 1385: 1369: 939: 935: 1983:

Shadow Minister for the Cabinet Office and Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster

1896: 1136:: "She started playing chess at the age of seven and became BWCA U14 Champion." 291: 263: 980: 744: 639: 432: 297: 1547:

should not be questioned as a primary source. Any information available from

1258: 2727:, the discussion is still ongoing because we have no consensus yet. And the 2135: 1953: 1823: 1708:

Media and Sport), which is different from how it is put in Knowledge (XXG).

662: 460: 436: 426: 405: 2050:. In February 2018, both Matheson and Laura Smith were announced as junior 1976:

as they are compiled for the same organisation, the UK Parliament. You can

1193: 2126:). Further references include her interview for The Londoner Diary of the 1265:. Reeves, clearly your bête noire, was also photographed for the cover of 1034:

they are unnecessary/unreliable but then adding a link in the same vein.

643: 2429:

constituents and the wider British public throughout the war and beyond.

2366:

This template is only a talk page banner - the dispute must be listed at

2115: 2059: 2035: 2936:

I certainly have no objection to that edit if you are happy to make it.

2399:

Knowledge (XXG):Dispute resolution noticeboard/Archive 189#Rachel Reeves

463:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, you can visit the

3029:

1) Find something you want to change about an article lead and mark as

2342: 1973: 1553: 3126: 3111: 3089: 3021: 2973: 2959: 2945: 2931: 2905: 2891: 2853: 2838: 2820: 2795: 2775: 2752: 2718: 2703: 2680: 2666: 2648: 2620: 2606: 2592: 2573: 2542: 2494: 2475: 2459: 2438: 2318: 2290: 2267: 2240: 2219: 2155: 1875: 1850: 1797: 1775: 1742: 1717: 1695: 1669: 1647: 1626: 1598: 1574: 1507: 1483: 1445: 1433: 1409: 1377: 1350: 1330: 1310: 1292: 1251: 1234: 1214: 1118: 1092: 1074: 1057: 1005: 988: 960: 925: 878: 854: 1321:

She talks like a female Ed Miliband. Can we have a section on this?

327:. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the 1956:("Shadow Minister for Young People and Voter Engagement") is also 1925:(listed as "Deputy Leader and Chair of the Labour Party") is also 1978:

search for their individual profiles on the UK Parliament website

1220:

Okay the 'official' list on the English Chess Federation website

930:

If there are additional issues with the article, I'd welcome you

3222:

Unknown-importance biography (politics and government) articles

2337: 1788:

that states the difference between parliament.uk and hansard.

1222:

http://www.englishchess.org.uk/british-champions-1904-present/

834:

requires many more references - it seems well referenecd to me

226: 207:

from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially

184: 15: 2086:

on non-Labour Party websites. The UK Parliament profiles for

1585:. Hansard is the most reliable source for matters like this. 3096:

It appears to have an issue where the rules can be abused...

2361:

Knowledge (XXG):Dispute resolution noticeboard#Rachel Reeves

2018:

There is more evidence that Reeves, and not Hayes, replaced

459:, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to 372: 352: 2735:, and there was no response, so I restored the status quo. 1275:

drop the stick and back slowly away from the horse carcass

570:

Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom

3237:

Low-importance biography (science and academia) articles

2070:. Other press releases on the Labour Party website from 1960:, held since her January 2020 further appointment, etc. 3272:

High-importance Politics of the United Kingdom articles

1548: 910: 906: 898: 890: 160: 2122:, where she was introduced by this title (and not as 3217:

C-Class biography (politics and government) articles

2560:

minister. If the consensus here though is that that

766:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 661:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 556:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2671:Removed as there has been no objection to this. -- 2106:Finally, Reeves has been officially referred to as 573:

Template:WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom

174: 3155:https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cnl05pyw8yjo}} 2964:Reinstated as there has been no objection to this 2653:It seems like this is a perennial problem, so per 3232:C-Class biography (science and academia) articles 2878:. Well no, nobody had responded to my point from 934:editting the article or adding appropriate tags. 2552:, in general, what happens in other articles is 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 3267:C-Class Politics of the United Kingdom articles 2084:Shadow Minister of State for the Cabinet Office 2368:Knowledge (XXG):Dispute resolution noticeboard 2351:Knowledge (XXG):Dispute resolution noticeboard 2134:and the biographical details provided for the 1818:, and also the description of this episode of 2026:. Three former junior Shadow Ministers under 1539:in the infobox. The validity of the official 1257:Perhaps your Google is broken. Mine returned 8: 3227:Politics and government work group articles 2124:Shadow Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster 1972:. This is the same information recorded in 1914:Shadow Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster 1897:Labour Party's official Shadow Cabinet page 1533:Shadow Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster 1037:Looking at the user history I can see that 780:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Women's History 1895:Addressing NYKTNE's valid point about the 712: 607: 553:WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom 518: 400: 258: 2876:everyone above seems to disagree with you 3242:Science and academia work group articles 2108:"Shadow Minister for the Cabinet Office" 2080:"Shadow Minister for the Cabinet Office" 2064:"Shadow Minister for the Cabinet Office" 2052:"Shadow Minister for the Cabinet Office" 3297:Mid-importance Women's History articles 3147: 2030:were referred to using the same title. 1356:Shadow Minister for the Cabinet Office? 714: 609: 576:Politics of the United Kingdom articles 520: 402: 260: 230: 3095: 2875: 2811:the most important thing on my radar. 2349:An editor has requested assistance at 2024:Shadow Minister for the Cabinet Office 2000:April 2020 party website press release 1958:Shadow Minister for the Cabinet Office 1905:Shadow Minister for the Cabinet Office 1537:Shadow Minister for the Cabinet Office 1341:employment/workfare/benefits as well. 364:the politics and government work group 2517:Hi Defacto. Thanks for your edits to 2306:consensus building in Knowledge (XXG) 1946:("Shadow Justice Secretary") is also 837:has been editted by anyone with a COI 675:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Economics 481:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Yorkshire 337:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Biography 7: 3307:WikiProject Women's History articles 2882:, so I assumed no one disagreed. -- 783:Template:WikiProject Women's History 760:This article is within the scope of 655:This article is within the scope of 550:This article is within the scope of 313:This article is within the scope of 3302:All WikiProject Women-related pages 3207:Biography articles of living people 384:the science and academia work group 249:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 3257:High-importance Yorkshire articles 2100:"Shadow Minister (Cabinet Office)" 2056:press release on the party website 2010:rank, as her supposed predecessor 1980:. Reeves' profile confirms her as 14: 3282:Low-importance Economics articles 1994:confirm both of them as a junior 1933:Leader of the Official Opposition 946:suggests there is a case for the 50:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome! 3292:C-Class Women's History articles 2505: 2341: 2068:the party's online press release 2062:was announced as another junior 2034:, Cat Smith and now former MPs, 1996:Shadow Minister (Cabinet Office) 840:has been editted by the subject. 747: 737: 716: 642: 632: 611: 543: 522: 435: 425: 404: 300: 290: 262: 231: 190:This article must adhere to the 45:Click here to start a new topic. 3098:is the "it" in that phrase the 3094:I'm not with you. When you say 1939:Shadow First Secretary of State 800:This article has been rated as 695:This article has been rated as 590:This article has been rated as 501:This article has been rated as 3287:WikiProject Economics articles 3262:WikiProject Yorkshire articles 3247:WikiProject Biography articles 1927:National Campaign Co-ordinator 1269:magazine, as the photographer 883:The primary content editor is 678:Template:WikiProject Economics 567:Politics of the United Kingdom 558:Politics of the United Kingdom 530:Politics of the United Kingdom 484:Template:WikiProject Yorkshire 340:Template:WikiProject Biography 1: 2829:before you come back too. -- 2500:Removal of gender information 2495:19:43, 18 November 2022 (UTC) 2359:The discussion is located at 1366:Labour Party website in March 1351:16:22, 18 November 2016 (UTC) 1293:10:29, 21 February 2014 (UTC) 1261:. A few more clicks returned 1252:15:01, 19 February 2014 (UTC) 1235:14:44, 19 February 2014 (UTC) 1119:16:18, 11 December 2012 (UTC) 1093:23:25, 20 November 2011 (UTC) 1075:21:36, 20 November 2011 (UTC) 1058:21:00, 20 November 2011 (UTC) 1006:21:07, 20 November 2011 (UTC) 989:20:56, 20 November 2011 (UTC) 774:and see a list of open tasks. 669:and see a list of open tasks. 650:Business and economics portal 564:and see a list of open tasks. 381:This article is supported by 361:This article is supported by 193:biographies of living persons 42:Put new text under old text. 2922:) 21:17, 13 July 2024 (UTC) 2460:02:46, 29 January 2022 (UTC) 2439:19:29, 26 January 2022 (UTC) 325:contribute to the discussion 2523:Chancellor of the Exchequer 2227:Title now added to infobox 1470:have a listed job as such. 1215:20:29, 2 January 2014 (UTC) 763:WikiProject Women's History 205:must be removed immediately 3323: 3277:C-Class Economics articles 3252:C-Class Yorkshire articles 3212:C-Class biography articles 2738:We could also look at the 2503: 2476:08:59, 25 April 2022 (UTC) 2353:regarding a dispute about 2042:, were all referred to as 1743:13:49, 30 April 2020 (UTC) 1718:13:28, 30 April 2020 (UTC) 1696:10:49, 30 April 2020 (UTC) 1670:08:50, 30 April 2020 (UTC) 1648:07:58, 30 April 2020 (UTC) 1627:07:00, 30 April 2020 (UTC) 1599:10:41, 29 April 2020 (UTC) 1575:08:16, 29 April 2020 (UTC) 1508:12:50, 26 April 2020 (UTC) 1484:11:30, 26 April 2020 (UTC) 1446:10:51, 26 April 2020 (UTC) 1434:10:00, 26 April 2020 (UTC) 1410:09:49, 26 April 2020 (UTC) 1378:05:42, 23 April 2020 (UTC) 961:20:14, 18 March 2010 (UTC) 926:07:29, 18 March 2010 (UTC) 879:23:36, 17 March 2010 (UTC) 855:21:25, 17 March 2010 (UTC) 806:project's importance scale 701:project's importance scale 596:project's importance scale 507:project's importance scale 3127:09:50, 10 July 2024 (UTC) 3112:09:47, 10 July 2024 (UTC) 3090:09:24, 10 July 2024 (UTC) 3022:07:09, 10 July 2024 (UTC) 2974:15:47, 14 July 2024 (UTC) 2960:21:46, 13 July 2024 (UTC) 2946:21:29, 13 July 2024 (UTC) 2932:21:17, 13 July 2024 (UTC) 2906:13:47, 13 July 2024 (UTC) 2892:08:17, 13 July 2024 (UTC) 2854:13:44, 13 July 2024 (UTC) 2839:13:16, 13 July 2024 (UTC) 2825:I think you need to read 2821:12:40, 13 July 2024 (UTC) 2796:11:13, 13 July 2024 (UTC) 2776:10:27, 13 July 2024 (UTC) 2753:09:10, 13 July 2024 (UTC) 2719:08:04, 13 July 2024 (UTC) 2704:23:11, 12 July 2024 (UTC) 2681:21:20, 12 July 2024 (UTC) 2667:15:36, 11 July 2024 (UTC) 2649:09:38, 10 July 2024 (UTC) 1986:, while the profiles for 1331:14:50, 22 June 2016 (UTC) 1311:19:43, 6 April 2015 (UTC) 799: 732: 694: 627: 589: 538: 500: 420: 380: 360: 285: 257: 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 2621:22:34, 9 July 2024 (UTC) 2607:22:23, 9 July 2024 (UTC) 2593:21:24, 9 July 2024 (UTC) 2574:19:20, 9 July 2024 (UTC) 2543:18:53, 9 July 2024 (UTC) 2319:09:39, 21 May 2020 (UTC) 2291:07:05, 21 May 2020 (UTC) 2268:06:32, 21 May 2020 (UTC) 2241:17:05, 20 May 2020 (UTC) 2220:16:54, 20 May 2020 (UTC) 2156:16:19, 20 May 2020 (UTC) 2098:were listed as a junior 1876:07:35, 20 May 2020 (UTC) 1851:07:13, 20 May 2020 (UTC) 1798:02:58, 20 May 2020 (UTC) 1776:23:26, 19 May 2020 (UTC) 786:Women's History articles 2370:for editors to respond. 1562:Hansard summary article 1543:website and profile of 1014:Poorly Sourced Material 453:is within the scope of 275:Politics and Government 2639:done with that power. 1949:Shadow Lord Chancellor 377: 357: 239:This article is rated 75:avoid personal attacks 658:WikiProject Economics 456:WikiProject Yorkshire 376: 356: 316:WikiProject Biography 243:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 100:Neutral point of view 2112:7 May 2020 interview 279:Science and Academia 105:No original research 2078:refer to each as a 2481:Taxation of assets 1558:Hansard transcript 1124:U14 chess champion 681:Economics articles 487:Yorkshire articles 378: 358: 343:biography articles 245:content assessment 86:dispute resolution 47: 2692:Margaret Thatcher 2531:Margaret Thatcher 2512:User talk:DeFacto 2376: 2375: 2372: 2140:BBC Question Time 1317:Speech impediment 1291: 1279:Blackberry Sorbet 1213: 1201:Blackberry Sorbet 1048:comment added by 820: 819: 816: 815: 812: 811: 711: 710: 707: 706: 606: 605: 602: 601: 517: 516: 513: 512: 399: 398: 395: 394: 225: 224: 183: 182: 66:Assume good faith 43: 3314: 3190: 3185: 3179: 3174: 3168: 3163: 3157: 3152: 2509: 2508: 2458: 2364: 2345: 2338: 2303: 2253: 2199: 2128:Evening Standard 2058:. In July 2018, 1970:House of Commons 1890: 1865: 1814: 1786: 1761: 1728: 1706: 1680: 1658: 1615: 1530: 1496: 1468: 1422: 1281: 1203: 1060: 915: 914: 886:User:Pinkhandbag 876: 871: 788: 787: 784: 781: 778: 757: 752: 751: 750: 741: 734: 733: 728: 720: 713: 683: 682: 679: 676: 673: 652: 647: 646: 636: 629: 628: 623: 615: 608: 578: 577: 574: 571: 568: 547: 540: 539: 534: 526: 519: 489: 488: 485: 482: 479: 445: 443:Yorkshire portal 440: 439: 429: 422: 421: 416: 408: 401: 345: 344: 341: 338: 335: 321:join the project 310: 308:Biography portal 305: 304: 303: 294: 287: 286: 281: 266: 259: 242: 236: 235: 227: 213:this noticeboard 185: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 16: 3322: 3321: 3317: 3316: 3315: 3313: 3312: 3311: 3197: 3196: 3195: 3194: 3193: 3186: 3182: 3175: 3171: 3164: 3160: 3153: 3149: 2740:Finkbeiner test 2515: 2514: 2506: 2502: 2483: 2449: 2426: 2297: 2247: 2200: 2193: 1899:, it indicates 1880: 1855: 1827:The Independent 1804: 1780: 1747: 1722: 1700: 1674: 1652: 1605: 1516: 1490: 1458: 1416: 1360:As reverted by 1358: 1338: 1319: 1176:The Independent 1158:Financial Times 1134:Yorkshire Chess 1126: 1103: 1043: 1027: 1016: 973: 888: 884: 872: 867: 828: 785: 782: 779: 777:Women's History 776: 775: 768:Women's history 753: 748: 746: 726: 724:Women's History 680: 677: 674: 671: 670: 648: 641: 621: 592:High-importance 575: 572: 569: 566: 565: 533:High‑importance 532: 503:High-importance 486: 483: 480: 477: 476: 441: 434: 415:High‑importance 414: 342: 339: 336: 333: 332: 306: 301: 299: 272: 240: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 3320: 3318: 3310: 3309: 3304: 3299: 3294: 3289: 3284: 3279: 3274: 3269: 3264: 3259: 3254: 3249: 3244: 3239: 3234: 3229: 3224: 3219: 3214: 3209: 3199: 3198: 3192: 3191: 3180: 3169: 3158: 3146: 3145: 3141: 3140: 3139: 3138: 3137: 3136: 3135: 3134: 3133: 3132: 3131: 3130: 3129: 3079: 3068: 3067: 3066: 3065: 3064: 3063: 3062: 3061: 3050: 3049: 3048: 3047: 3046: 3045: 3044: 3043: 3039: 3036: 3033: 3027: 2998: 2997: 2996: 2995: 2994: 2993: 2992: 2991: 2990: 2989: 2988: 2987: 2986: 2985: 2984: 2983: 2982: 2981: 2980: 2979: 2978: 2977: 2976: 2868: 2867: 2866: 2865: 2864: 2863: 2862: 2861: 2860: 2859: 2858: 2857: 2856: 2808: 2805: 2802: 2784: 2781: 2763: 2759: 2736: 2687: 2504: 2501: 2498: 2487:86.139.240.232 2482: 2479: 2463: 2462: 2425: 2422: 2421: 2420: 2419: 2418: 2417: 2416: 2415: 2414: 2413: 2412: 2411: 2410: 2409: 2408: 2407: 2406: 2405: 2404: 2403: 2402: 2374: 2373: 2363: 2346: 2336: 2335: 2334: 2333: 2332: 2331: 2330: 2329: 2328: 2327: 2326: 2325: 2324: 2323: 2322: 2321: 2192: 2191: 2190: 2189: 2188: 2187: 2186: 2185: 2184: 2183: 2182: 2181: 2180: 2179: 2178: 2177: 2176: 2175: 2174: 2173: 2172: 2171: 2170: 2169: 2168: 2167: 2166: 2165: 2164: 2163: 2162: 2161: 2160: 2159: 2158: 2120:Channel 4 News 2072:September 2018 2048:Cabinet Office 2032:Chris Matheson 2008:Shadow Cabinet 1919:Shadow Cabinet 1911:as solely the 1764:Channel 4 News 1514: 1513: 1512: 1511: 1510: 1456: 1455: 1454: 1453: 1452: 1451: 1450: 1449: 1448: 1357: 1354: 1337: 1336:Policy stances 1334: 1323:78.149.214.161 1318: 1315: 1303:86.140.159.144 1298: 1297: 1296: 1295: 1244:86.147.196.102 1239: 1238: 1227:86.147.196.102 1198: 1197: 1194:Fabian Society 1191: 1185: 1179: 1173: 1170:Total Politics 1167: 1161: 1155: 1149: 1143: 1137: 1125: 1122: 1102: 1099: 1098: 1097: 1096: 1095: 1025: 1018:I notice that 1015: 1012: 1011: 1010: 1009: 1008: 977:self-published 972: 969: 968: 967: 966: 965: 964: 963: 842: 841: 838: 835: 827: 824: 822: 818: 817: 814: 813: 810: 809: 802:Mid-importance 798: 792: 791: 789: 772:the discussion 759: 758: 755:History portal 742: 730: 729: 727:Mid‑importance 721: 709: 708: 705: 704: 697:Low-importance 693: 687: 686: 684: 667:the discussion 654: 653: 637: 625: 624: 622:Low‑importance 616: 604: 603: 600: 599: 588: 582: 581: 579: 562:the discussion 548: 536: 535: 527: 515: 514: 511: 510: 499: 493: 492: 490: 447: 446: 430: 418: 417: 409: 397: 396: 393: 392: 389:Low-importance 379: 369: 368: 359: 349: 348: 346: 312: 311: 295: 283: 282: 267: 255: 254: 248: 237: 223: 222: 218:this help page 202:poorly sourced 188: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3319: 3308: 3305: 3303: 3300: 3298: 3295: 3293: 3290: 3288: 3285: 3283: 3280: 3278: 3275: 3273: 3270: 3268: 3265: 3263: 3260: 3258: 3255: 3253: 3250: 3248: 3245: 3243: 3240: 3238: 3235: 3233: 3230: 3228: 3225: 3223: 3220: 3218: 3215: 3213: 3210: 3208: 3205: 3204: 3202: 3189: 3184: 3181: 3178: 3173: 3170: 3167: 3162: 3159: 3156: 3151: 3148: 3144: 3128: 3124: 3120: 3115: 3114: 3113: 3109: 3105: 3101: 3097: 3093: 3092: 3091: 3087: 3083: 3080: 3076: 3075: 3074: 3073: 3072: 3071: 3070: 3069: 3058: 3057: 3056: 3055: 3054: 3053: 3052: 3051: 3040: 3037: 3034: 3032: 3028: 3025: 3024: 3023: 3019: 3015: 3011: 3007: 3003: 2999: 2975: 2971: 2967: 2963: 2962: 2961: 2957: 2953: 2949: 2948: 2947: 2943: 2939: 2935: 2934: 2933: 2929: 2925: 2921: 2917: 2913: 2912:WP:FIRSTWOMAN 2909: 2908: 2907: 2903: 2899: 2895: 2894: 2893: 2889: 2885: 2881: 2880:WP:FIRSTWOMAN 2877: 2873: 2869: 2855: 2851: 2847: 2842: 2841: 2840: 2836: 2832: 2828: 2824: 2823: 2822: 2818: 2814: 2809: 2806: 2803: 2799: 2798: 2797: 2793: 2789: 2785: 2782: 2779: 2778: 2777: 2773: 2769: 2764: 2760: 2756: 2755: 2754: 2750: 2746: 2741: 2737: 2734: 2733:WP:FIRSTWOMAN 2730: 2726: 2722: 2721: 2720: 2716: 2712: 2707: 2706: 2705: 2701: 2697: 2693: 2688: 2684: 2683: 2682: 2678: 2674: 2670: 2669: 2668: 2664: 2660: 2656: 2655:WP:FIRSTWOMAN 2652: 2651: 2650: 2646: 2642: 2637: 2632: 2628: 2624: 2623: 2622: 2618: 2614: 2610: 2609: 2608: 2604: 2600: 2596: 2595: 2594: 2590: 2586: 2581: 2577: 2576: 2575: 2571: 2567: 2563: 2559: 2555: 2551: 2547: 2546: 2545: 2544: 2540: 2536: 2532: 2528: 2524: 2520: 2519:Rachel Reeves 2513: 2499: 2497: 2496: 2492: 2488: 2480: 2478: 2477: 2473: 2469: 2461: 2456: 2452: 2447: 2443: 2442: 2441: 2440: 2436: 2432: 2423: 2400: 2397:(archived at 2396: 2395: 2394: 2393: 2392: 2391: 2390: 2389: 2388: 2387: 2386: 2385: 2384: 2383: 2382: 2381: 2380: 2379: 2378: 2377: 2371: 2369: 2362: 2358: 2356: 2355:Rachel Reeves 2352: 2347: 2344: 2340: 2339: 2320: 2316: 2312: 2307: 2301: 2296: 2295: 2294: 2293: 2292: 2288: 2284: 2280: 2276: 2273: 2272: 2271: 2270: 2269: 2265: 2261: 2257: 2251: 2246: 2245: 2244: 2243: 2242: 2238: 2234: 2230: 2226: 2225: 2224: 2223: 2222: 2221: 2217: 2213: 2209: 2205: 2197: 2157: 2153: 2149: 2145: 2141: 2137: 2133: 2130:newspaper on 2129: 2125: 2121: 2117: 2113: 2109: 2105: 2101: 2097: 2093: 2089: 2085: 2081: 2077: 2073: 2069: 2065: 2061: 2057: 2053: 2049: 2045: 2041: 2037: 2033: 2029: 2028:Jeremy Corbyn 2025: 2021: 2017: 2013: 2009: 2005: 2001: 1997: 1993: 1989: 1985: 1984: 1979: 1975: 1971: 1967: 1963: 1959: 1955: 1951: 1950: 1945: 1941: 1940: 1935: 1934: 1928: 1924: 1923:Angela Rayner 1920: 1916: 1915: 1910: 1907:(SMftCO) and 1906: 1902: 1898: 1894: 1888: 1884: 1879: 1878: 1877: 1873: 1869: 1863: 1859: 1854: 1853: 1852: 1848: 1844: 1840: 1836: 1832: 1828: 1824: 1821: 1820:Question Time 1817: 1812: 1808: 1803: 1802: 1801: 1800: 1799: 1795: 1791: 1784: 1779: 1778: 1777: 1773: 1769: 1765: 1759: 1755: 1751: 1746: 1745: 1744: 1740: 1736: 1732: 1726: 1721: 1720: 1719: 1715: 1711: 1704: 1699: 1698: 1697: 1693: 1689: 1685: 1678: 1673: 1672: 1671: 1667: 1663: 1656: 1651: 1650: 1649: 1645: 1641: 1637: 1633: 1630: 1629: 1628: 1624: 1620: 1613: 1609: 1604: 1603: 1602: 1601: 1600: 1596: 1592: 1588: 1584: 1580: 1579: 1578: 1577: 1576: 1572: 1568: 1563: 1559: 1555: 1550: 1549:parliament.uk 1546: 1542: 1541:UK Parliament 1538: 1534: 1528: 1524: 1520: 1515: 1509: 1505: 1501: 1494: 1489: 1488: 1487: 1486: 1485: 1481: 1477: 1473: 1466: 1462: 1457: 1447: 1443: 1439: 1438: 1437: 1436: 1435: 1431: 1427: 1420: 1415: 1414: 1413: 1412: 1411: 1407: 1403: 1399: 1395: 1391: 1387: 1384: 1383: 1382: 1381: 1380: 1379: 1375: 1371: 1367: 1363: 1355: 1353: 1352: 1348: 1344: 1335: 1333: 1332: 1328: 1324: 1316: 1314: 1312: 1308: 1304: 1294: 1289: 1285: 1280: 1276: 1272: 1268: 1264: 1260: 1256: 1255: 1253: 1249: 1245: 1241: 1240: 1236: 1232: 1228: 1223: 1219: 1218: 1217: 1216: 1211: 1207: 1202: 1195: 1192: 1189: 1188:Ethos Journal 1186: 1183: 1180: 1177: 1174: 1171: 1168: 1165: 1162: 1159: 1156: 1153: 1150: 1147: 1144: 1141: 1138: 1135: 1132: 1131: 1130: 1123: 1121: 1120: 1116: 1112: 1106: 1101:Wedding cakes 1100: 1094: 1090: 1086: 1085:Shakehandsman 1081: 1078: 1077: 1076: 1072: 1068: 1067:Shakehandsman 1063: 1062: 1061: 1059: 1055: 1051: 1047: 1040: 1039:Shakehandsman 1035: 1031: 1024: 1021: 1020:Shakehandsman 1013: 1007: 1003: 999: 998:Shakehandsman 995: 994: 993: 992: 991: 990: 986: 982: 978: 970: 962: 958: 954: 949: 945: 941: 937: 933: 929: 928: 927: 923: 919: 912: 908: 904: 900: 896: 892: 887: 882: 881: 880: 877: 875: 870: 864: 859: 858: 857: 856: 852: 848: 839: 836: 833: 832: 831: 825: 823: 807: 803: 797: 794: 793: 790: 773: 769: 765: 764: 756: 745: 743: 740: 736: 735: 731: 725: 722: 719: 715: 702: 698: 692: 689: 688: 685: 668: 664: 660: 659: 651: 645: 640: 638: 635: 631: 630: 626: 620: 617: 614: 610: 597: 593: 587: 584: 583: 580: 563: 559: 555: 554: 549: 546: 542: 541: 537: 531: 528: 525: 521: 508: 504: 498: 495: 494: 491: 474: 473: 468: 467: 462: 458: 457: 452: 451: 450:Rachel Reeves 444: 438: 433: 431: 428: 424: 423: 419: 413: 410: 407: 403: 390: 387:(assessed as 386: 385: 375: 371: 370: 366: 365: 355: 351: 350: 347: 330: 329:documentation 326: 322: 318: 317: 309: 298: 296: 293: 289: 288: 284: 280: 276: 271: 268: 265: 261: 256: 252: 246: 238: 234: 229: 228: 220: 219: 214: 210: 206: 203: 199: 195: 194: 189: 187: 186: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 25:Rachel Reeves 22: 18: 17: 3183: 3172: 3161: 3150: 3142: 3100:WP:CONSENSUS 3005: 2561: 2557: 2516: 2484: 2464: 2427: 2365: 2348: 2300:PinkPanda272 2279:PinkPanda272 2250:PinkPanda272 2229:PinkPanda272 2208:PinkPanda272 2202:Agreed with 2201: 2143: 2136:9 April 2020 2123: 2107: 2103: 2099: 2083: 2079: 2063: 2051: 2043: 2023: 2015: 2012:Jon Trickett 2003: 1995: 1982: 1965: 1961: 1957: 1947: 1937: 1930: 1926: 1912: 1904: 1903:is the only 1892: 1887:PinkPanda272 1858:PinkPanda272 1839:PinkPanda272 1831:The Scotsman 1819: 1754:PinkPanda272 1731:PinkPanda272 1703:PinkPanda272 1684:PinkPanda272 1655:PinkPanda272 1636:PinkPanda272 1612:PinkPanda272 1587:PinkPanda272 1581:Agreed with 1523:PinkPanda272 1493:PinkPanda272 1472:PinkPanda272 1440:Agreed with 1419:PinkPanda272 1398:PinkPanda272 1394:The Guardian 1359: 1343:Libraryloser 1339: 1320: 1299: 1266: 1199: 1146:The Guardian 1140:The Guardian 1127: 1107: 1104: 1044:— Preceding 1036: 1032: 1028: 1017: 976: 974: 873: 868: 843: 829: 821: 801: 761: 696: 656: 591: 551: 502: 470: 466:project page 464: 454: 448: 382: 362: 314: 251:WikiProjects 216: 204: 197: 191: 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 2966:Michaeldble 2952:Michaeldble 2924:Michaeldble 2916:Michaeldble 2872:Michaeldble 2801:notability. 2696:Michaeldble 2631:Michaeldble 2599:Michaeldble 2510:Moved from 2468:82.11.93.53 2446:Nancy Astor 2424:Nancy Astor 2204:LeedsOwlNew 2148:LeedsOwlNew 2138:edition of 2132:11 May 2020 2096:Laura Smith 2040:Laura Smith 1944:David Lammy 1901:Helen Hayes 1862:LeedsOwlNew 1811:LeedsOwlNew 1783:LeedsOwlNew 1768:LeedsOwlNew 1608:LeedsOwlNew 1583:LeedsOwlNew 1567:LeedsOwlNew 1362:LeedsOwlNew 1050:82.31.42.10 971:Google Plus 944:Jezhotwells 918:Jezhotwells 148:free images 31:not a forum 3201:Categories 3143:References 2874:, you say 2729:convention 2627:GnocchiFan 2613:GnocchiFan 2554:irrelevant 1182:Daily Mail 1083:emerges.-- 953:MikeHobday 847:MikeHobday 2076:June 2019 1992:Cat Smith 1954:Cat Smith 1152:The Times 672:Economics 663:Economics 619:Economics 478:Yorkshire 472:talk page 461:Yorkshire 412:Yorkshire 334:Biography 270:Biography 209:libellous 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 3119:CarterPD 3082:CarterPD 3002:CarterPD 2938:CarterPD 2898:CarterPD 2846:CarterPD 2813:CarterPD 2768:CarterPD 2725:CarterPD 2711:CarterPD 2641:CarterPD 2585:CarterPD 2550:CarterPD 2535:CarterPD 2287:contribs 2237:contribs 2216:contribs 2116:Jon Snow 2088:Matheson 2060:Jo Platt 2036:Jo Platt 2020:Trickett 1847:contribs 1835:Sky News 1739:contribs 1692:contribs 1660:change. 1644:contribs 1595:contribs 1480:contribs 1406:contribs 1390:BBC News 1288:contribs 1271:recounts 1210:contribs 1046:unsigned 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 3104:DeFacto 3078:others? 3031:WP:LEAD 3014:DeFacto 2884:DeFacto 2831:DeFacto 2788:DeFacto 2745:DeFacto 2673:DeFacto 2659:DeFacto 2636:WP:LEAD 2580:WP:LEAD 2566:DeFacto 2527:WP:LEAD 2451:RolandR 2431:HMW1987 2196:outdent 2054:in the 2022:as the 1974:Hansard 1931:Deputy 1756:, and 1750:Alex B4 1554:Hansard 1527:Alex B4 1525:, and 1461:Alex B4 1444:. Alex 1111:Pbrione 899:history 804:on the 699:on the 594:on the 505:on the 241:C-class 154:WP refs 142:scholar 3060:issue. 2827:WP:AGF 2311:NYKTNE 2275:NYKTNE 2260:NYKTNE 2256:WP:DRN 2044:SMftCO 1952:, and 1909:Reeves 1883:NYKTNE 1868:NYKTNE 1807:NYKTNE 1790:NYKTNE 1758:NYKTNE 1725:NYKTNE 1710:NYKTNE 1677:NYKTNE 1662:NYKTNE 1632:NYKTNE 1619:NYKTNE 1519:NYKTNE 1500:NYKTNE 1465:NYKTNE 1442:NYKTNE 1426:NYKTNE 1386:NYKTNE 1370:NYKTNE 940:Wereon 936:Wereon 932:boldly 863:Wereon 247:scale. 126:Google 3042:only. 3012:. -- 3006:isn't 2629:and @ 2558:prime 2114:with 2102:too. 2092:Platt 2004:SFSoS 1988:Hayes 1966:SFSoS 1267:Chess 981:Yworo 907:watch 903:links 874:glass 869:Gallo 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 3123:talk 3108:talk 3086:talk 3018:talk 3010:here 2970:talk 2956:talk 2942:talk 2928:talk 2920:talk 2902:talk 2888:talk 2850:talk 2835:talk 2817:talk 2792:talk 2772:talk 2749:talk 2715:talk 2700:talk 2677:talk 2663:talk 2645:talk 2625:Hi @ 2617:talk 2603:talk 2589:talk 2570:talk 2539:talk 2491:talk 2472:talk 2455:talk 2435:talk 2315:talk 2283:talk 2264:talk 2233:talk 2212:talk 2152:talk 2094:and 2074:and 2038:and 1990:and 1936:and 1885:and 1872:talk 1860:and 1843:talk 1833:and 1809:and 1794:talk 1772:talk 1735:talk 1714:talk 1688:talk 1666:talk 1640:talk 1623:talk 1610:and 1591:talk 1571:talk 1560:and 1535:and 1504:talk 1476:talk 1463:and 1430:talk 1402:talk 1392:and 1374:talk 1347:talk 1327:talk 1307:talk 1284:talk 1263:this 1259:this 1248:talk 1231:talk 1206:talk 1115:talk 1089:talk 1071:talk 1054:talk 1002:talk 985:talk 957:talk 922:talk 911:logs 895:talk 891:edit 851:talk 826:Tags 586:High 497:High 323:and 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 3110:). 3020:). 2890:). 2837:). 2794:). 2751:). 2679:). 2665:). 2572:). 2118:on 2066:in 1545:MPs 1164:BBC 948:COI 796:Mid 691:Low 198:BLP 176:TWL 3203:: 3125:) 3088:) 2972:) 2958:) 2944:) 2930:) 2904:) 2852:) 2819:) 2774:) 2717:) 2702:) 2647:) 2619:) 2605:) 2591:) 2562:is 2541:) 2493:) 2474:) 2437:) 2317:) 2289:) 2266:) 2258:. 2239:) 2218:) 2198:) 2154:) 2146:-- 2142:. 2104:4. 2090:, 2016:3. 1962:2. 1942:, 1929:, 1893:1. 1874:) 1849:) 1837:. 1829:, 1822:: 1796:) 1774:) 1752:, 1741:) 1716:) 1694:) 1668:) 1646:) 1625:) 1597:) 1573:) 1521:, 1506:) 1482:) 1432:) 1408:) 1376:) 1349:) 1329:) 1313:) 1309:) 1286:• 1277:. 1254:) 1250:) 1233:) 1208:• 1117:) 1091:) 1073:) 1056:) 1004:) 987:) 959:) 924:) 909:| 905:| 901:| 897:| 893:| 853:) 391:). 277:/ 273:: 156:) 54:; 3121:( 3106:( 3084:( 3016:( 3000:@ 2968:( 2954:( 2940:( 2926:( 2918:( 2900:( 2886:( 2870:@ 2848:( 2833:( 2815:( 2790:( 2770:( 2747:( 2723:@ 2713:( 2698:( 2675:( 2661:( 2643:( 2615:( 2601:( 2587:( 2568:( 2548:@ 2537:( 2489:( 2470:( 2457:) 2453:( 2433:( 2401:) 2357:. 2313:( 2302:: 2298:@ 2285:/ 2281:( 2262:( 2252:: 2248:@ 2235:/ 2231:( 2214:/ 2210:( 2194:( 2150:( 1889:: 1881:@ 1870:( 1864:: 1856:@ 1845:/ 1841:( 1813:: 1805:@ 1792:( 1785:: 1781:@ 1770:( 1760:: 1748:@ 1737:/ 1733:( 1727:: 1723:@ 1712:( 1705:: 1701:@ 1690:/ 1686:( 1679:: 1675:@ 1664:( 1657:: 1653:@ 1642:/ 1638:( 1621:( 1614:: 1606:@ 1593:/ 1589:( 1569:( 1529:: 1517:@ 1502:( 1495:: 1491:@ 1478:/ 1474:( 1467:: 1459:@ 1428:( 1421:: 1417:@ 1404:/ 1400:( 1372:( 1345:( 1325:( 1305:( 1290:) 1282:( 1246:( 1237:) 1229:( 1225:( 1212:) 1204:( 1113:( 1087:( 1069:( 1052:( 1000:( 983:( 955:( 920:( 913:) 889:( 849:( 808:. 703:. 598:. 509:. 475:. 367:. 331:. 253:: 221:. 196:( 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 58:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index