186:
Coalition
Against Domestic Violence uses female pronouns to refer to petitioners and male pronouns to refer to abusers due to the fact that most petitioners are women and most alleged abusers are men." I read the source article and it actually says that most victims are women and most abusers are men, which is concurrent with the majority of research on DV. The word "alleged" was added by the author presumably to water down the facts, as seems to be the case for most of this page. A section called "burden of proof" doesn't even actually say what the burden of proof is for a protection order (preponderance of the evidence), and instead describes it as "low." I do no dispute the statistical analyses that are provided for the discussion of efficacy, except to say there is a significant and credible body of research not presented to show the benefits of protective orders. I hope someone will be willing to revisit this page and balance the information presented.
209:
you are aware of competing research that presents a different and more positive view of restraining orders, I'd invite you to participate in editing the article to add such research, not merely encouraging others to do so. As for the standard of proof, I will shortly add a brief discussion of the actual standard of proof to that section of the article. What you say is true up to a point: the standard is "preponderance of the evidence" in many states--but definitely not all states--so a bit of discussion is warranted on that point.
74:
53:
84:
347:
22:
208:
I removed the 'alleged' from the text that specifically cited restraining orders in
Wisconsin and California to be more consistent with the references which do indeed refer to actual, not merely alleged, abusers. I agree that much of this article presents the negative side of restraining orders. If
185:
The article does not talk about the history of protection orders or give a lot of information as to why they exist, and instead spends a lot of time seeming to try to prove why they shouldn't exist. Cites some extremely biased sources, such as Joseph
Cordell. Paraphrases from a source, "The Wisconsin
359:
287:
283:
269:
136:
367:
403:
126:
249:
193:
408:
265:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
33:
255:
398:
330:
97:
58:
286:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
39:
197:
321:
241:
101:, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the
189:
379:
237:
305:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
293:
240:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
250:
http://www.endabusewi.org/sites/default/files/resources/process_for_obtaining_a_restraining_order.pdf
21:
171:
350:
This article was the subject of a Wiki
Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between
290:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
306:
375:
363:
233:
214:
163:
313:
256:
https://web.archive.org/web/20130815044625/http://www.mncourts.gov/district/2/?page=1174
272:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
167:
312:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
279:
392:
73:
52:
346:
259:
210:
83:
278:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
159:
89:
79:
383:
335:
218:
201:
175:
102:
15:
244:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
282:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
268:This message was posted before February 2018.
162:or be a disambiguation between injunction and
260:http://www.mncourts.gov/district/2/?page=1174
8:
187:
47:
341:Wiki Education assignment: Senior Seminar
232:I have just modified 2 external links on
49:
19:
7:
95:This article is within the scope of
105:and the subjects encompassed by it.
38:It is of interest to the following
355:
351:
14:
236:. Please take a moment to review
358:. Further details are available
345:
82:
72:
51:
20:
248:Corrected formatting/usage for
131:This article has been rated as
111:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Law
1:
384:18:42, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
374:— Assignment last updated by
336:18:56, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
404:Low-importance law articles
176:18:39, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
425:
299:(last update: 5 June 2024)
229:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
137:project's importance scale
130:
67:
46:
409:WikiProject Law articles
219:21:33, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
202:17:41, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
158:Should this redirect to
114:Template:WikiProject Law
225:External links modified
28:This article is rated
362:. Student editor(s):
32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
399:C-Class law articles
280:regular verification
270:After February 2018
360:on the course page
324:InternetArchiveBot
275:InternetArchiveBot
34:content assessment
300:
234:Restraining order
204:
192:comment added by
151:
150:
147:
146:
143:
142:
416:
386:
368:article contribs
357:
353:
349:
334:
325:
298:
297:
276:
164:protection order
119:
118:
115:
112:
109:
92:
87:
86:
76:
69:
68:
63:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
424:
423:
419:
418:
417:
415:
414:
413:
389:
388:
373:
343:
328:
323:
291:
284:have permission
274:
242:this simple FaQ
227:
183:
156:
116:
113:
110:
107:
106:
98:WikiProject Law
88:
81:
61:
29:
12:
11:
5:
422:
420:
412:
411:
406:
401:
391:
390:
352:9 January 2024
342:
339:
318:
317:
310:
263:
262:
254:Added archive
252:
226:
223:
222:
221:
182:
179:
155:
152:
149:
148:
145:
144:
141:
140:
133:Low-importance
129:
123:
122:
120:
94:
93:
77:
65:
64:
62:Low‑importance
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
421:
410:
407:
405:
402:
400:
397:
396:
394:
387:
385:
381:
377:
371:
369:
365:
361:
348:
340:
338:
337:
332:
327:
326:
315:
311:
308:
304:
303:
302:
295:
289:
285:
281:
277:
271:
266:
261:
257:
253:
251:
247:
246:
245:
243:
239:
235:
230:
224:
220:
216:
212:
207:
206:
205:
203:
199:
195:
194:69.55.211.122
191:
180:
178:
177:
173:
169:
165:
161:
153:
138:
134:
128:
125:
124:
121:
104:
100:
99:
91:
85:
80:
78:
75:
71:
70:
66:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
376:Softball1313
372:
364:Softball1313
356:10 June 2024
344:
322:
319:
294:source check
273:
267:
264:
231:
228:
188:— Preceding
184:
157:
132:
117:law articles
96:
40:WikiProjects
103:legal field
393:Categories
331:Report bug
181:Neutrality
160:injunction
154:Injunction
90:Law portal
314:this tool
307:this tool
168:Ferberson
320:Cheers.—
190:unsigned
238:my edit
135:on the
30:C-class
211:Dash77
36:scale.
380:talk
354:and
215:talk
198:talk
172:talk
370:).
288:RfC
258:to
127:Low
108:Law
59:Law
395::
382:)
301:.
296:}}
292:{{
217:)
200:)
174:)
166:?
378:(
366:(
333:)
329:(
316:.
309:.
213:(
196:(
170:(
139:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
