Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:Richter-tuned harmonica

Source 📝

74: 53: 22: 84: 416:
help of overblows), R&B...you name it. 90% of the blues material should be relocated to an article--one that doesn't yet exist--entitled "blues harmonica." That would redress the imbalance. Alternately, this article could provide a brief survey of the best known players in various idioms who use Richter-tuned harmonicas.
482:
There is no such thing as "Richter-tuned" harmonica. This is a common misnomer for a "German standard tuned" harmonica. "Richter" is the construction method used in these 10 hole/20 reed diatonic harmonicas (and others) whereby the comb is sandwiched between 2 reed-plates, with two reeds per chamber,
415:
There's absolutely no reason why an article on the Richter-tuned harmonica should be dominated by a history of blues harmonica players. The Richter-tuned harmonica is used by players in the full range of American folk and popular musics: not just blues, but country, bluegrass, folk, jazz (with the
486:
These common diatonic harmonicas using the Richter construction are usually made with "German Standard" tuning, which provides a major triad for the key of the harmonica when any three 3 adjacent holes are blown together, and a major triad one fifth above the key of harmonica when 3 of the first 4
436:
This article is incorrect in stated that little walter developed the tongue-blocking method of playing octaves. Chromatic and marine band harmonica players have been playing octave and a few others intervals since at least the early thirties. In particular, the members of Borrah Minevich's
165:
Hi all, I added some info about straight, cross and slant harp playing. This is just what I have picked up along the way, so if anyone has a reliable source, please add it. I also took out references to playing with a band, as you can play cross harp playing solo (and any other position).
185:
Someone recently changed the first para to say that a 10-hole harp plays 20 different notes. But as the intro correctly said, there are 10 holes, two notes per hole, but one note is repeated (draw 2 is the same note as blow 3). So that's 19 notes. I've reverted the change.
301:
of which I know is that for measuring shocks such as earthquakes. (No harmonica plays that Richter scale, as it has no upper bound, though one could hypothetically use the scale to measure the tiny amount of shaking caused by a typical harmonica.) The article itself has
225:
I suggest that this article be moved to “Richter-tuned harmonica” (currently redirected here). Richter-tuned harmonicas may be well-suited for the blues, but they were not invented for the blues, and are certainly not exclusively used for the blues.
459:
I think there should be mention of the British player (and singer) Paul Jones, both in the early Manfred Mann band and in more recent Manfred Mann line-ups. I remember that in the 1960s many considered him the best British blues-harp player.
388:"PowerBender" is not a generic term referring to a general class of harmonica, but rather a specific tuning of an otherwise standard 10-hole diatonic. This tuning was invented by Brendan Power and he promotes harmonicas with this tuning here: 205:
Topically it is all over the map. As an example of what I'm talking about, Bob Dylan may play the harmonica, but that fact has nothing to do with blues harp. Also, the straight/cross/slant is not explained very well.
483:
each on separate reed-plates. This is distinct from the Knittlinger construction method which is used on the chromatic harmonica, in which the blow and draw reed are placed side by side on the same reed-plate.
330:
This is confusing. Would it not be better explained by stating that the harp chosen should be a fourth above the song key ie to play in G, a C harp should be used for the cross harp efffect?
327:
The article states: "This involves playing music in the key a perfect fourth below the key of the harmonica - for example, on a C tuned harmonica, a second position blues would be in G."
140: 349:
Do bends, overblows and overdraws work in exactly the same way (I mean, same holes bendable by the same amount of semitones) on those harps as on major ones? Any reference on that?
515: 130: 106: 510: 242:
It also has an entire section titled "Overview/Valved Diatonics" which is not at all an "overview" and never describes what valved diatonics actually are.
97: 58: 368:. I think the article should show which notes are obtained by bending and overblow/drawing, as can be found in textbooks, but that's just my opinion. 396:. However, to refer to the Suzuki SUb30 as a 'Power Bender', is certainly misleading and by any reasonable standard, just plain incorrect. 369: 350: 440: 417: 397: 249: 33: 191: 171: 187: 167: 437:
Harmonica Rascals and Jerry Murad of the Harmonicats used octave playing extensively many years prior to 1950.
373: 354: 39: 444: 421: 401: 468: 253: 245: 211: 335: 492: 105:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
392:. Brendan Power did play a part in the development of the "Suzuki Sub30 Ultrabend" as explained here: 207: 331: 21: 488: 312: 232: 393: 464: 102: 272: 365: 306:
wikified, so that any reader who wants to be clear on what that means can read about it. —
307: 303: 284: 227: 504: 389: 297: 280: 496: 472: 448: 425: 405: 377: 358: 339: 317: 257: 237: 215: 195: 175: 89: 79: 73: 52: 271:
may have been jocular vandalism, or it may have been serious. I'm going to
394:
http://www.brendan-power.com/History%20of%20the%20UltraBend.htm
15: 275:
and explain why it is not simply redundant but actually
366:
http://www.angelfire.com/tx/myquill/SpecialTunings.html
268: 463:
I hope that someone more skilled than me can add him.
101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 390:http://www.brendan-power.com/The%20POWERBENDER.htm 161:Added information about straight/cross/slant harp 115:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Musical Instruments 283:. A scale arranges notes in ascending order; 411:Why does this article focus on blues players? 8: 516:Low-importance musical instruments articles 157:Is this the most common type of harmonica? 243: 47: 118:Template:WikiProject Musical Instruments 269:The edit referring to the Richter scale 49: 19: 201:This whole article is horribly written 7: 511:C-Class musical instruments articles 95:This article is within the scope of 38:It is of interest to the following 14: 487:draw notes are played together. 364:Some answers can be found here: 82: 72: 51: 20: 181:19 notes on a 10 hole harmonica 135:This article has been rated as 98:WikiProject Musical Instruments 1: 238:09:03, 18 February 2009 (UTC) 109:and see a list of open tasks. 449:10:21, 6 December 2014 (UTC) 340:16:00, 13 January 2010 (UTC) 216:06:44, 3 February 2009 (UTC) 121:musical instruments articles 345:Specially-tuned instruments 318:08:42, 14 August 2009 (UTC) 532: 406:18:27, 26 April 2013 (UTC) 258:23:17, 16 March 2021 (UTC) 176:03:38, 24 April 2008 (UTC) 141:project's importance scale 497:23:46, 21 July 2019 (UTC) 426:12:01, 27 July 2013 (UTC) 378:07:30, 6 April 2010 (UTC) 359:07:52, 2 April 2010 (UTC) 134: 67: 46: 473:06:56, 17 May 2016 (UTC) 323:Definition of Cross Harp 279:. There is no Richter 196:21:11, 7 May 2008 (UTC) 295:at another. The only 28:This article is rated 287:does not. The notes 32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 188:TheAstonishingBadger 168:TheAstonishingBadger 112:Musical Instruments 103:musical instruments 59:Musical Instruments 291:at one point, and 34:content assessment 273:assume good faith 260: 248:comment added by 155: 154: 151: 150: 147: 146: 523: 315: 235: 123: 122: 119: 116: 113: 92: 87: 86: 85: 76: 69: 68: 63: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 531: 530: 526: 525: 524: 522: 521: 520: 501: 500: 480: 457: 434: 432:Playing Octaves 413: 386: 347: 325: 316: 311: 304:“Richter-tuned” 266: 236: 231: 223: 203: 183: 163: 120: 117: 114: 111: 110: 88: 83: 81: 61: 29: 12: 11: 5: 529: 527: 519: 518: 513: 503: 502: 479: 476: 456: 453: 433: 430: 412: 409: 385: 382: 381: 380: 370:80.200.192.228 351:81.243.222.115 346: 343: 324: 321: 310: 285:Richter tuning 265: 262: 230: 222: 219: 202: 199: 182: 179: 162: 159: 153: 152: 149: 148: 145: 144: 137:Low-importance 133: 127: 126: 124: 107:the discussion 94: 93: 77: 65: 64: 62:Low‑importance 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 528: 517: 514: 512: 509: 508: 506: 499: 498: 494: 490: 484: 477: 475: 474: 470: 466: 465:GeoffBrueghel 461: 454: 452: 450: 446: 442: 441:63.152.91.131 438: 431: 429: 427: 423: 419: 418:108.11.218.10 410: 408: 407: 403: 399: 398:75.159.152.66 395: 391: 384:Power Benders 383: 379: 375: 371: 367: 363: 362: 361: 360: 356: 352: 344: 342: 341: 337: 333: 328: 322: 320: 319: 314: 309: 305: 300: 299: 298:Richter scale 294: 290: 286: 282: 281:musical scale 278: 274: 270: 264:Richter scale 263: 261: 259: 255: 251: 250:209.6.114.189 247: 240: 239: 234: 229: 220: 218: 217: 213: 209: 200: 198: 197: 193: 189: 180: 178: 177: 173: 169: 160: 158: 142: 138: 132: 129: 128: 125: 108: 104: 100: 99: 91: 80: 78: 75: 71: 70: 66: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 485: 481: 462: 458: 439: 435: 414: 387: 348: 329: 326: 296: 292: 288: 276: 267: 244:— Preceding 241: 224: 208:spacebuffalo 204: 184: 164: 156: 136: 96: 90:Music portal 40:WikiProjects 451:iowaplayer 505:Categories 455:Paul Jones 332:57vintage 308:SlamDiego 228:SlamDiego 489:Supe Bee 246:unsigned 478:Richter 293:descend 139:on the 30:C-class 36:scale. 289:stall 277:wrong 221:Title 493:talk 469:talk 445:talk 422:talk 402:talk 374:talk 355:talk 336:talk 254:talk 212:talk 192:talk 172:talk 428:AG 131:Low 507:: 495:) 471:) 447:) 424:) 404:) 376:) 357:) 338:) 313:←T 256:) 233:←T 214:) 206:-- 194:) 174:) 491:( 467:( 443:( 420:( 400:( 372:( 353:( 334:( 252:( 226:— 210:( 190:( 170:( 143:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Musical Instruments
WikiProject icon
Music portal
WikiProject Musical Instruments
musical instruments
the discussion
Low
project's importance scale
TheAstonishingBadger
talk
03:38, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
TheAstonishingBadger
talk
21:11, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
spacebuffalo
talk
06:44, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
SlamDiego
←T
09:03, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
unsigned
209.6.114.189
talk
23:17, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
The edit referring to the Richter scale
assume good faith

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.