332:
322:
304:
478:
240:
222:
191:
489:
shows that Rudok is still apprimately 10 times more frequent than Rutog. In case that we keep both new and old Rudok/Rutog in the same article, then I would suggest to move back to the original article "Rudok". A third spelling (Rutok) is popular in
English language guidebooks and should also be
476:
Another issue is the article title. Rudok (created on 13 February 2006) was merged into Rutog (created on 13 September 2007) without discussion on which is the most common
English name. Despite its small size, Rudok has an important historical significance and is known in English publications
417:) describes the much newer Chinese settlement. Rutog lies on the G219; Rudok a few kilometres off it. The Lonely Planet guide to Tibet 7th edition pp 237 - 238 provides an accurate description of the two places.
153:
569:
286:
446:
Besides the fact that the page contains some wrong information (for example population data) and also outdated information, the main problem is that after the merging done on 22 April 2011 with
564:
378:
486:
482:
147:
559:
549:
280:
79:
450:, the article is mixing information about "Old Rudok" and "New Rudok", which are two distinct villages located about 10km away, as mentioned by
384:
85:
574:
554:
544:
44:
354:
256:
99:
30:
104:
20:
74:
168:
202:
135:
345:
309:
247:
227:
65:
424:
353:
related articles on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
456:
either split again the two articles, or create two different sections describing both new and old Rudok separately
512:
I am just (re)discovering this discussion 8 years later (I am the same person as
Pseudois above). I will simply
521:
436:
129:
109:
190:
208:
125:
517:
458:. I am volunteering to make the necessary corrections, but I'm not sure what is the best option. --
161:
55:
255:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
175:
495:
463:
451:
432:
70:
321:
303:
51:
141:
538:
491:
459:
337:
425:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/maryloosemore/archives/date-taken/2010/08/18/page2/
327:
239:
221:
24:
413:) is describing the older, Tibetan village, whereas that for Rutog / 日土县 (
429:
This is my first contribution to a talk page. I hope it's appropriate.
525:
499:
467:
440:
350:
252:
184:
15:
481:. The historical prevalence of Rudok over Rutog can be seen
420:
I visited Rudok and drove through Rutog on 18 August 2010.
414:
409:
Reading the content of both pages, the entry for Rudok (
570:
Stub-Class China-related articles of
Unknown-importance
513:
447:
160:
410:
349:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
251:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
383:This article has not yet received a rating on the
285:This article has not yet received a rating on the
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
174:
8:
490:added but probably not as article title.--
298:
216:
188:
565:Unknown-importance China-related articles
300:
218:
7:
343:This article is within the scope of
245:This article is within the scope of
207:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
415:http://en.wikipedia.org/Rutog_Town
14:
560:Stub-Class China-related articles
550:Unknown-importance Tibet articles
487:An analysis of the last 10 years
406:The pages should not be merged.
330:
320:
302:
238:
220:
189:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
479:since at least the 19th century
1:
526:15:25, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
411:http://en.wikipedia.org/Rudok
357:and see a list of open tasks.
259:and see a list of open tasks.
42:Put new text under old text.
441:15:41, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
500:17:45, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
468:17:45, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
363:Knowledge:WikiProject China
265:Knowledge:WikiProject Tibet
50:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
591:
575:WikiProject China articles
555:WikiProject Tibet articles
385:project's importance scale
366:Template:WikiProject China
268:Template:WikiProject Tibet
545:Stub-Class Tibet articles
382:
315:
284:
233:
215:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
402:Merging and title name
369:China-related articles
197:This article is rated
75:avoid personal attacks
100:Neutral point of view
454:. I think we should
105:No original research
203:content assessment
86:dispute resolution
47:
514:undo the redirect
399:
398:
395:
394:
391:
390:
346:WikiProject China
297:
296:
293:
292:
248:WikiProject Tibet
183:
182:
66:Assume good faith
43:
582:
371:
370:
367:
364:
361:
340:
335:
334:
333:
324:
317:
316:
306:
299:
287:importance scale
273:
272:
269:
266:
263:
242:
235:
234:
224:
217:
200:
194:
193:
185:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
590:
589:
585:
584:
583:
581:
580:
579:
535:
534:
404:
368:
365:
362:
359:
358:
336:
331:
329:
270:
267:
264:
261:
260:
201:on Knowledge's
198:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
588:
586:
578:
577:
572:
567:
562:
557:
552:
547:
537:
536:
533:
532:
531:
530:
529:
528:
518:Dominique Roux
505:
504:
503:
502:
471:
470:
403:
400:
397:
396:
393:
392:
389:
388:
381:
375:
374:
372:
355:the discussion
342:
341:
325:
313:
312:
307:
295:
294:
291:
290:
283:
277:
276:
274:
271:Tibet articles
257:the discussion
243:
231:
230:
225:
213:
212:
206:
195:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
587:
576:
573:
571:
568:
566:
563:
561:
558:
556:
553:
551:
548:
546:
543:
542:
540:
527:
523:
519:
515:
511:
510:
509:
508:
507:
506:
501:
497:
493:
488:
484:
483:in this chart
480:
475:
474:
473:
472:
469:
465:
461:
457:
453:
452:Maryloosemore
449:
445:
444:
443:
442:
438:
434:
433:Maryloosemore
430:
427:
426:
421:
418:
416:
412:
407:
401:
386:
380:
377:
376:
373:
356:
352:
348:
347:
339:
328:
326:
323:
319:
318:
314:
311:
308:
305:
301:
288:
282:
279:
278:
275:
258:
254:
250:
249:
244:
241:
237:
236:
232:
229:
226:
223:
219:
214:
210:
204:
196:
192:
187:
186:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
455:
431:
428:
422:
419:
408:
405:
344:
338:China portal
246:
209:WikiProjects
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
148:free images
31:not a forum
539:Categories
199:Stub-class
25:Rutog Town
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
492:Pseudois
460:Pseudois
423:Photos:
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
154:WP refs
142:scholar
205:scale.
126:Google
448:Rudok
360:China
351:China
310:China
262:Tibet
253:Tibet
228:Tibet
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
522:talk
516:. --
496:talk
464:talk
437:talk
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
379:???
281:???
176:TWL
541::
524:)
498:)
485:.
466:)
439:)
156:)
54:;
520:(
494:(
462:(
435:(
387:.
289:.
211::
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
