Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:Russians at War

Source 📝

3448:"At the screening, festival CEO Cameron Bailey stated that "In emails and phone calls, TIFF staff received hundreds of instances of verbal abuse. Our staff also received threats of violence, including threats of sexual violence." Although Bailey did not state this on the record, The Hollywood Reporter further confirmed that TIFF staff had received numerous worrying inquiries requesting schematic floor plan diagrams of the Scotiabank Theatre, and precise details of its security arrangements for the entrance and exit of high-profile talent to and from the venue." 1225: 2127:
after the 2nd minute of ovation. So the audience tried to support her, I guess. The main sense was that she, by her own initiative, risked her life to record the evidence of Russian soldiers saying, "We don't want to kill Ukrainians; they were always our brothers". I am sure this film will screw up Putin's plans to recruit more soldiers. I find it almost funny that it is the Ukrainian media that is most aggressive against the film, whereas the film wants to save lives, including Ukrainians.
462: 564: 351: 331: 1611:
film. I suggest 1) having a section, level 1 “Controversy” and move all types of responses under that title, as level-2 sections. After the text is all about responses. We can also change the title of such big section to “Controversy and critical response”. The level-2 subsections here would be: 1) Response from film festivals and professional organizations 2) Response from media 3) (maybe) Response from politicians 4) anything on controversy here, if needed
1332:
premiered at the 81st Venice International Film Festival. Film festival entries are almost always shown before the film is released elsewhere. But you can probably visit the Venice festival website and learn more about where it may end up being shown - probably streamed, as it's unlikely to be a film that would earn anything at theaters (notwithstanding that documentaries almost never make it to theater release any more to begin with). cheers.
940: 528: 919: 835: 717: 814: 696: 950: 1446:, gave no clue as to intent or motive for asking the question. I do a lot of editing here, and I've run across too many instances of people pushing some general query about the topic of an article to the talk page, with no clear intent to improve the article (e.g. "Does salt water taffy have sea water in it?", things like that). It happens frequently, and often results in the question being summarily deleted per 1257: 845: 540: 452: 1094: 261: 421: 222: 2275:
be completed. Besides, as in the story of Mansky about an arrest of his operator, during the wars, there should be additional creativity and risks, and not reliance on "things as usual". Trofimova made several films about ISIS, which, considering the content of the films, required permissions of 4 different countries, and none of them were obtained. This is just a specifics of war journalism.
3355: 612: 591: 271: 727: 622: 391: 191: 1166: 1155: 1144: 1122: 247: 1209: 371: 1052: 1024: 3419: 3016:“Ukrainian side wants me to show and then condemn military actions of Russian soldiers but their own films don’t show military actions of their soldiers. Instead Ukrainian films show human faces and lives involved in this war. So that what I show too: human lives. What Ukrainian side wants relate to different topics and scripts”. 2988:
Russian Ministry of Defense. If these were true, then it would be a great risk for Trofimova, a Canadian citizen, to engage in questioning Russian solders at their front. Some are convinced, therefore, that the film is simply a carefully crafted Russian propaganda project. They speculate that Trofimova, a former filmmaker at
1133: 3013:"If we don't see each other as people… these black and white stereotypes about each other, this will only make the war continue. This will only make the hatred grow… unfortunately, that's sort of the route taken by politicians, but I don't think that this is the route that regular people should take." 2995:
However, Trofimova explains that there were many gaps in the control over media in the Russian Army, which was focused more on the military than on the media issues. She also reminded that the speculations about her being hired by Russia to produce this film don't make sense as "no Russian channel is
2274:
This sentence is not very relevant for the films about the wars as many war journalists risk their lives going back and forth between borders. During the wars, official permissions are often omitted, especially for documentalists, who have to record events here and now, not waiting for formalities to
1953:
The best proof would be asking Ms Bassel herself (which likely you can do), about the timeline: when did she had her press-conference when she was asked that question and gave her answer and when, what date did she actually saw the film. My proof would be only my own experience since I was in Venice,
1679:
Your opinion about the poor misunderstood Russian soliders is irrelevant to topic at hand. Introduction still needs amending to illustrate the significance of the controversy surrounding it - it would not have been this widely covered in media without widespread criticism that it is a thinly-veiled a
1557:
I agree. I even suggested earlier to split this section to the reception by industry, response in Ukrainian-Canadian community and reception by festivals but my proposed changes were reverted. I think it makes sense not to blend several types of responses. Plus a common reader might perceive the word
1637:
Russians at War is a 2024 documentary film directed by Russian-Canadian cinematographer Anastasia Trofimova, which has been widely criticized as Russian propaganda. The Canadian and Ontario government-funded film focuses on the perspective of Russian soldiers invading Ukraine during the ongoing 2014
2460:
I see little point in separating them by nationality and some don't fall into neat boxes, e.g. Garner is writing in the Moscow Times, which is based in the Netherlands, from Canada. Mansky is Russian but Meduza is based in Riga. Ukraine is a western country in that it's part of frontline Europe, so
1924:
Ms Bassel's press-conference was on September 4th, during which she gave a long answer to the question about Russians at War, justifying why she didn't watch the film yet, and why does she think that it is a Russian propaganda. Ms Bassel later realized that she should be aware of the details of the
1644:
Russians at War is a 2024 documentary film directed by Russian-Canadian cinematographer Anastasia Trofimova. The Canadian and Ontario government-funded film focuses on the perspective of Russian soldiers invading Ukraine during the ongoing 2014 Russian-Ukrainian war. It premiered at the 81st Venice
1493:
Documentary films require a modified approach for their articles. Instead of a plot summary, a documentary article should have a synopsis that serves as an overview of the documentary. The synopsis should describe the on-screen events without interpretation, following the same guidelines that apply
1426:
It's a documentary, not a popular fiction movie. Common sense would generally suggest that if one searches the 'net and can't find any information about where to view a film that was just a few days ago submitted to a film festival, it's self-evident that it is not yet available for viewing outside
3212:
The film will be shown at the Windsor International Film Festival which will run from October 24 to November 3, 2024. Executive director Vincent Georgie stated that "the film is there to create discussion and debates" and added that there will be additional security measures during the showings of
2940:
The nature of the controversy needs to be specified as the article states that it is a documentary film, and that is not strictly the case if it is a work of propaganda - that requires early clarification so readers are not misled. Otherwise we should introduce it as a documentary/propaganda film.
1595:
I suggest slitting this sections into several types of responses, otherwise it reads as a soup. Since Ukrainian media differs from Western sources, and there are mixed responses in Russian opposition media, perhaps it is better to have subsections: (1) Response in the Western media (2) Response in
1433:
In addition, bear in mind that article talk pages exist solely to discuss how to improve articles; they are not for general discussion about the subject of the article, nor are they a help desk for obtaining instructions or technical assistance. Material unsuitable for talk pages may be subject to
3252:
said that in adding the film to festival programs, "decision-makers should expect a storm of criticism for their mistakes. Lawmakers should ask questions. So should sponsors. Festival-goers can complain. With luck, Trofimova’s film may eventually serve a useful purpose, as a career-killer for all
3019:
Trofimova also agreed that the project was very risky for the soldiers and for her personally, and she did not believe at every stage of this project that it was possible. She felt that an anti-war film like this was worth the risks and could be her contribution to finishing the Russian-Ukrainian
2957:
Agree with UrbanVillager. OlidaO is clearly biased, devaluing the anti-war focus of this film. Trofimova risks her life, going their on her own (even Dolin can't believe that that was real, and praised her if it is) - similarly as she did in her other projects. She will likely get a very negative
1610:
I agree. Plus there is a mixup of the text in Critical Response and Controversy. There is also no subheading under the Controversy title, but then level-2 section follows in the Controversy section. Part of the Critical Response covers the Controversy issues. It also misses several reviews of the
1345:
This is about improving the article. Editors can better frame edits if they view the media. Making blind edits without viewing the media is less helpful than actually have watched the media in question. In terms of searching the internet, that has been done and have come up empty. I feel like
2987:
Many media outlets expressed doubts about Trofimova's story: that a small single woman can ride with the Russian military all the way to the front, film footage of military equipment and operations, ask her provocative questions, live there for 7 months, all without an official approval from the
2303:
I did address it: Mr. Garner forgets or is not aware of the specific of war journalism. The film is about the war, so such specifics is expected. The industry knows it, that is why nobody in the industry worries about it. We hear such questions only from outsiders of the industry. I also suggest
2126:
In case it matters: I was there, in Venice, and the ovation indeed lasted longer than for other films. It felt like 10 minutes for me, and I didn't time it. I remember seeing the film director as a petit skinny girl, not knowing how to react, not expecting such attention and breaking into crying
2978:
Two small sections (see below) were removed but they were relevant to the description of the film. The first one relates to the heated discussions that the story is fake, and was a made-up by Russian authorities as propaganda. The second is Trofimova's response and position as cited in media. I
2812:
Other critics noted that Trofimova engaged in to stylistic efforts to create an atmosphere of innocence. "Anastasia endeavors to empathize with Russians not only diegetically but also cinematically. For instance, throughout the film, images of the characters are interspersed with observational
1331:
You asked on the talk page for the 'Russians at war' movie where you might be able to see it. I've deleted your question; article talk pages are intended for discussing article improvement, only. I say this without any snark - Google is the first stop. Second, the lede of the article states it
2902:
I would recommend erasing these two sentences from the intro because a. they're duplicates, b. they're referring to a very sensitive issue that could easily be misunderstood by casual readers, and c. they're inviting users to a fight over who said what at the very beginning of the article.
1713:
The following sentence is very awkward: "The film focuses on the anti-war perspective and thoughts about Russian-Ukrainian unity reflected by Russian soldiers fighting on the front lines in Ukraine and civilians burying their men during the Ukrainian-Russian war." Also, the director's own
3010:"I find it a little bit of a strange question if we can humanize or not humanize someone. So, are there lists of people who we can humanize and people who we can't? Of course, we have to humanize everyone. This is a huge tragedy for our region, first of all, and for the entire world" . 1780:
said that "it is quite obvious that the author is on the side of their heroes" and called the film's screening in Venice "a mistake by the festival." Mansky himself attempted to send a cameraman to film on the Russian side during the invasion, but his cameraman was promptly arrested.
2322:
Re: doubts that Trofimova went without "supervision" or permission of military - why did her responses to criticism were removed from this wiki page? It is better to hear from the "horse' mouth". Considering her ISIS-related films, I trust her story completely, it is her style.
2351:
What part was misleading? Did you watch the film? Were you in touch with the film team to know the specifics? Did you watch Trofimova's other films, to get the sense of your style, focus and levels of risks that she is used to? Please base your suggestions on facts, as I do.
1370:. We go by what reliable sources have stated, not the judgements editors have made from viewing a movie personally. Removing the question has nothing to do with censorship; I'm baffled how you come to that conclusion. Asking if the movie can be viewed has nothing to do with 3048:
These are useful sections and very relevant. The "Disbelieve" about possible Russian financing could be added to the Budget section, and the "Position of the Director", as it is sufficiently referenced, can conclude the page. I vote for including both sections to the text.
1232: 1038: 2208:
This reference was was likely included after the text was posted, so it was not in line with the other references, and should be removed to the section "Reception by the Ukrainian media" or "Reception in the industry". The rest of the paragraph should be returned.
2430:
The film was widely criticised for being russian propaganda – that is a simple fact that can be sourced and referenced by reliable sources. The film would have received zero media attention without the immediate critical reactions after people saw it at venice.
2258:
outlets expressed doubts about Trofimova's accompanied the Russian military to the front, filmed footage of military equipment and operations, asked her provocative questions and lived there for 7 months without an official approval from the Russian Ministry of
1633:
I think we need to be less handwavy about the very serious allegations against the film - it's very dangerous to present it as a regular documentary film - which it is not. I propose an amended introduction to raise awareness of controversy early on:
2925:
urbanvillager has been clocked for trying whitewash this article and inserting inaccuracies . The controversy should be in the introduction as it is basically its major defining feature - there would be little media coverage of this film without it.
1664:
This debate gets extremely polarised, just like in the palestine-israel conflict, where all intentions of seeing humans on the other side are critized. Many critiques haven't even seen the film, as it was written here in a former version, too.
2996:
allowed to show even a death of a solder, or criticize the war, unlike my film". She reminds of her risks of being prosecuted in Russia and that Russian soldiers wanted her to film them and their opinions as they had nothing to lose .
2781:
It's a matter of being objective and stating the facts. TIFF said there were safety threats, police denied there were any safety threats significant enough for police to be involved. It's not our fault if that makes TIFF look bad.
1596:
the Ukrainian media and 3) Response in Russian media (that would include opposition and, most likely, coming responses from Russia, when they see the film). So clearly even how we can separate the text between first two sections.
2766:
And what does whether the police are involved or not have to do with anything? What difference does that make? People wanted the film cancelled, and now that it's been cancelled they're still criticizing TIFF for cancelling it?
1856:Все переругались из-за фильма «Русские на войне». Его сняли на российской стороне фронта и показали в Венеции Разбираемся с экспертами «Медузы» — военными аналитиками и Антоном Долиным, — как относиться к этой картине — Meduza 2192:, one that questions the current regime in Russia," Darya Bassel, a producer who watched the film at the festival, said in a Facebook post. "However, what I witnessed is a prime example of pure Russian propaganda," she said. 2304:
returning the deleted fragment about Trofimova asking provocative questions. Being Canadian, asking provocative questions to the Russian solders at the front is rather risky. This is important for the context of the film.
2401:
But heads up to everyone - this "you haven't seen it so you can't have an opinion" line is the party line that all russian trolls are pursuing at present, whether or not the person they're arguing with has seen the film.
3680: 153: 246: 3675: 3630: 2958:
reaction from Russia when the film will reach Russia. So how it is propaganda? I wonder if OlidaO saw the film. I think editing of this page should be done by people who watched the film, as I did in Venice.
2011:
We were there at the premier, recorded the ovation and timed it. Question is - where should we post it just to prove the point, if otherwise it would be not interesting to watch and has limited information?
2445:
It was widely criticized in Ukrainian and some (not all) Russian opposition media but the reviews in Western media were positive. I think, it makes sense to have sub-sections in the Critical Response part.
1925:
film and perhaps watched it after the press-conference. There are recording of these press-conference, which are not published. So technically she hasn't watched the film while responding to that question.
1478:
Irrelevant. When it becomes available then respond on the talk page. Also wikipedia editors are a smart bunch that have clever ways above what is visible in the first few pages of an internet search.
1873:
The Ukrainian government sent a protest letter to the 81st Venice International Film Festival in August 2024, before the film's trailer (September 4) or the film itself (September 5) had been released
2461:
it could be generally better considered appropriate to group those reviews with more fawning Canadian reviews and separate the Russian reviews. Trying to make clear distinctions is a losing battle.
1216: 1034: 1470:
This isn't a general discussion about the subject of the article. I thought it would be obvious that knowing first hand about the subject, rather than relying on bias sources was a good thing.
2658:"In a statement to CBC, the Toronto Police Service said the decision to pause screenings was made independently by event organizers, and not based on any recommendation from Toronto Police." 1427:
of the film festival (where reliable sources - film critics - are often found). Using the talk page to ask questions about the topic of an article is generally 'frowned' upon. Quoting from
1270:
procedure applies to this article. This article is related to Eastern Europe or the Balkans, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
1577:
Notable, during Ms. Bassel's press conference at the festival on September 4th, 2024, Ms. Bassel admitted that she didn't watch the "Russians at War" yet when she was making this comment.
2250:
noted that Trofimova's claim that she did not have official permission to film the soldiers "hardly stands up to scrutiny in a country where independent journalism simply does not exist"
1910:
Yes, I agree. The cited article in fact says that she made her comments after seeing the film. The cited article is directly contradicting this Knowledge (XXG) article in this regard.
573: 435: 340: 232: 2864: 1830:
During Ms. Bassel's press conference at the festival on September 4, 2024, she indicated that that she "hadn't watched the "Russians at War" yet" when she was making these comments
360: 236: 3105: 1855: 1809: 1107: 1064: 3530: 380: 240: 147: 3328:
The whole section "Critical Response" is a mix-up and should be probably united with "Controversy" and then structured. Perhaps, into subsections, as I suggested above.
3545: 1450:. Perhaps next time, include the context for asking the question. As written, it looked like a random question that would be more suitable for a 'net search. cheers. 2541: 1093: 3625: 3580: 1714:
descriptions of the film don't suggest that it is focused on any of these things. Surely, this sentence deserves a citation if there is any evidence to support it?
508: 3209:
I would argue we don't need this paragraph at all. I recommend deleting, but if kept I recommend this tweak as existing para assumes TIFF threat claims are real.
3191: 3166: 3144: 3119: 2895:
Although public screenings were cancelled, with organizers blaming "significant threats", Toronto police were reported to be "not aware of any active threats".
2813:
footage of kittens in the military camp's interiors" said critic Volodymyr Chernyshev. "It’s just empathy for the soldiers without any critical context," said
2583: 79: 2910:" and those interested in the controversy can learn about it in depth in the appropriate section, with enough different viewpoints on the matter. Thoughts? -- 3560: 3525: 2704:
i think it should be left in - if we're mentioning why it was pulled we need to clarify that TIFF's reasoning was not corroborated by police. Need balance.
1006: 901: 3670: 3540: 2884: 2556:"Director Of 'Russians At War' Doc Bats Back Suggestions Of Whitewashing: "We Have To Humanize Everyone. This Is A Huge Tragedy For Our Region" – Venice" 796: 678: 518: 3660: 3520: 996: 1995:
During the film's word premiere at the 81st Venice International Film Festival on September 5, 2024, the film received a five-minute standing ovation
1391:. All the of the criticism is one sided. We have not heard from other sources and viewing the media may bring some common sense to the article. 1059: 1029: 3645: 3590: 3575: 891: 85: 3620: 3605: 3565: 3535: 2865:
https://macdonaldlaurier.ca/parliament-must-investigate-shameful-public-funding-for-russian-propaganda-film-aaron-gasch-burnett-for-inside-policy/
786: 668: 44: 1374:, that's why I deleted it. Are you suggesting that the article should state that editors don't know if it's possible to watch the film? cheers. 2603:
Controversy removed from introduction, important quotes from Mansky and Garner removed. Who is editing this into a press release for Trofimova?
3665: 3555: 2416:
It DOES matter if the editors use a judgemental and evaluative language (such as "Russian propaganda"), and not just add relevant information.
1810:
https://meduza.io/feature/2024/09/10/vse-pererugalis-iz-za-filma-russkie-na-voyne-ego-snyali-na-rossiyskoy-storone-fronta-i-pokazali-v-venetsii
3228:
or, "in response to alleged threats". I don't think there should be an assumption that the threats were real given the statements from police
972: 3650: 3610: 3595: 1911: 1721: 1068: 867: 3635: 30: 1528:
Much of the content in the "Critical Response" section seems to be political responses rather than film criticism. Should it be split up?
762: 644: 484: 399: 3550: 2827:
As a result of the documentary, there were calls for Canada to investigate the "shameful" public funding of a Russian propaganda film.
1409:. Most film plot (or synopsis) sections are written without references, i.e. with an implicit reference to the primary source: the film. 3451:
The Hollywood Reporter is simply quoting Bailey verbatim, who did speak on the record, and provides no additional evidence of threats.
2555: 3655: 3570: 3402: 2753: 1852:
Mansky himself attempted to send a cameraman to film on the Russian side during the invasion, but his cameraman was promptly arrested.
1695: 289: 99: 3640: 3585: 3007:"I want to make it clear that this Canadian-French film is anti-war and was made under great risk for everyone, especially for me" 2184: 963: 924: 104: 20: 2853: 1558:"Critical" as something negative and not as "Analytic" even though "Critical" means analytic. So I suggest returning my sections. 3615: 3600: 2569: 858: 819: 553: 431: 74: 2068:
Super, so it wasn't just us who were at the premier. I hope more people who were there would comment here, to verify this fact
1299: 1277: 1267: 758: 740: 701: 635: 596: 475: 426: 202: 168: 3515: 3314:
Agree. Festivals have vested interest in self-promotion. Should only be used if described and assessed by secondary sources.
2181:
Within the film industry, Trofimova's film was recognized as an original, professionally done and gutsy anti-war documentary.
2398:
It doesn't matter whether or not Knowledge (XXG) editors have seen the film. The point is credible sourcing and objectivity.
135: 65: 1758: 1747: 3386: 301: 293: 1295: 403: 297: 284: 227: 3037: 1412:
Also, distribution is an aspect we cover in film articles, so this was a perfectly fine and relevant question to ask.
3077: 3120:"Russian-Canadian director responds to TIFF documentary backlash, says journalists' follow the story where it goes'" 3361: 2337:
The whole edit was misleading and was removed. After so much misleading info, every sentence needs to be checked.
1844: 109: 3319: 2723: 2695: 2641: 2375: 2342: 2294: 2265: 2232: 2199: 2164: 2091: 2059: 2031: 2002: 1977: 1944: 1901: 1880: 1863: 1840: 1584: 1503: 1396: 1351: 1319: 129: 2738:
Why does it matter whether it was recommended by the police or not? What difference does that make to anything?
2718:
Yes, I would characterize the screening cancellation as being news-ly and not significant for the lead as well.
1388: 1287: 2542:"Venice Documentaries Attempt to Reckon With Russia's 'Historical, Transformative, Apocalyptic' War in Ukraine" 1915: 1725: 745: 208: 2899:
This information is already in the "Response from film festivals and professional organizations" subsection.
2915: 2516: 2502: 1224: 1063:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a 125: 3025: 1717: 3406: 2818: 2757: 1699: 2659: 1447: 1428: 1298:
may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the
1291: 55: 3430: 2666: 2608: 971:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
866:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
643:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
483:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
175: 70: 2662: 2604: 3315: 2719: 2691: 2637: 2618:
Introduction should have a general information, and controversy should be placed under "Controversy"
2384:
So it sounds like you haven't watched the film so you shouldn't participate in editing of this page.
2371: 2338: 2290: 2261: 2228: 2195: 2160: 2087: 2055: 2027: 1998: 1973: 1940: 1897: 1876: 1859: 1836: 1580: 1499: 1455: 1392: 1379: 1347: 1337: 1315: 2690:
Maybe we can remove it from the lead as per this discussion and being not historically significant.
2100:
What do you mean "How do I know? It was a big audience in the Grande theater, what is here to know?
190: 2681: 161: 2911: 2512: 2498: 1891: 1825: 1666: 1544: 1533: 2814: 2511:
My mistake, mixed up the filmmakers. Ms. Zhurba made the comment on not seeing it. Apologies. --
2156: 1969: 2879:
These parts of the intro are duplicates of existing information in later parts of the article:
2854:
https://kyivindependent.com/is-russians-at-war-propaganda-we-asked-7-people-in-film-who-saw-it/
3308: 3091: 2772: 2743: 51: 2633: 141: 3474: 3456: 3426: 3333: 3304: 3279: 3258: 3233: 3218: 3054: 3033: 2963: 2946: 2931: 2832: 2787: 2709: 2623: 2466: 2451: 2436: 2421: 2407: 2389: 2357: 2328: 2309: 2280: 2214: 2146: 2132: 2105: 2073: 2045: 2017: 1959: 1930: 1788: 1685: 1670: 1654: 1616: 1601: 1563: 1548: 1417: 402:) related to the subject, such as a picture of the set or a film poster. Please ensure that 2597: 1451: 1375: 1333: 955: 563: 350: 330: 24: 3496: 1645:
International Film Festival, after which it was widely criticized as Russian propaganda.
1366: 1759:
https://www.rferl.org/a/ukraine-russia-film-venice-canada-yermak-trofimova/33110069.html
1748:
https://www.rferl.org/a/ukraine-russia-film-venice-canada-yermak-trofimova/33110069.html
3394: 2989: 2677: 1473:
it's self-evident that it is not yet available for viewing outside of the film festival
1360:
No, you are incorrect. Editors editing the article based on viewing the movie would be
850: 545: 1488: 949: 939: 918: 3509: 3469:
Two Ukrainian murals were desecrated with red paint near the TIFF festival premises.
1777: 1529: 732: 627: 467: 1638:
Russian-Ukrainian war. It premiered at the 81st Venice International Film Festival.
3249: 2804:
New article, with potential additions for critical Response section, suggested adds
2768: 2739: 1890:
The film sparked backlash from some regional experts, Canadian politicians and the
1406: 1256: 527: 2584:"Sympathetic view of Russian soldiers creates controversy at Venice Film Festival" 834: 813: 716: 695: 288:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can 3470: 3452: 3329: 3300: 3254: 3229: 3214: 3050: 3029: 2959: 2942: 2927: 2828: 2783: 2705: 2619: 2462: 2447: 2432: 2417: 2403: 2385: 2353: 2324: 2305: 2276: 2210: 2142: 2128: 2101: 2069: 2041: 2013: 1955: 1926: 1784: 1681: 1650: 1612: 1597: 1559: 1413: 1280:
account (granted automatically to accounts with 500 edits and an age of 30 days)
276: 2887:, while the Toronto festival organizers defended the film as being "anti-war". 2496: 945: 840: 722: 617: 535: 457: 451: 420: 266: 260: 221: 2141:
I think the line about the ovation should be returned to the published text.
611: 590: 3004:
Trofimova responded to the criticism in multiple interviews, stating that:
390: 3397:|the 2024 film|Russian-participating wars|List of wars involving Russia}} 3385:
This article is about the 2024 film. For Russian-participating wars, see
3297: 968: 305: 3478: 3460: 3434: 3410: 3337: 3323: 3262: 3237: 3222: 3058: 3041: 2992:
was secretely hired by the Russian authorities to produce this film.
2967: 2950: 2935: 2919: 2836: 2791: 2776: 2761: 2747: 2727: 2713: 2699: 2685: 2670: 2645: 2627: 2612: 2520: 2506: 2470: 2455: 2440: 2425: 2411: 2393: 2379: 2361: 2346: 2332: 2313: 2298: 2284: 2269: 2236: 2218: 2203: 2168: 2150: 2136: 2109: 2095: 2077: 2063: 2049: 2035: 2021: 2006: 1981: 1963: 1948: 1934: 1919: 1905: 1884: 1867: 1792: 1729: 1703: 1689: 1674: 1658: 1620: 1605: 1588: 1567: 1552: 1537: 1507: 1458: 1421: 1400: 1382: 1355: 1323: 2752:
If there were any significant safety threats police would be involved.
863: 2979:
suggest returning these sections. Here they are, from previous edits:
2660:
https://www.cbc.ca/news/entertainment/russians-at-war-paused-1.7321915
1489:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Film#Documentaries
749: 640: 480: 2370:
Should we really answer this while this very topic is all about it.
1465:
they are not for general discussion about the subject of the article
757:
Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the
1208: 1051: 1023: 370: 2054:
But it was not your spouse but UrbanVillager who added the text.
2974:
To return the sections about disbelieve and Trofimova's position
2224:
This reference was was likely included after the text was posted
2289:
You haven't addressed the concerns raised above. So they stay.
3349: 1251: 184: 15: 3294:
she's involved in festival programming so not a film critic
3078:"Russian-army-movie-causes-a-scandal-at-venice-film-festival" 3681:
Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force articles
1223: 1207: 1092: 562: 526: 389: 369: 349: 329: 3253:
those so shamefully involved in making and promoting it."
2891:
This information is already in the "Controversy" section.
2190:
may mislead you into believing that it is an anti-war film
1286:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the
3676:
C-Class Russian, Soviet and CIS military history articles
3631:
WikiProject Russia articles with no associated task force
3280:
https://cepa.org/article/trofimov-v-trofimova-no-contest/
2908:
The film caused controversy following the world premiere.
1894:
community, who characterized it as "Russian propaganda."
2570:"Russian soldiers given their chance to speak at Venice" 1820:
Ms Bassel hadn't watched the film when she criticized it
1372:
directly discussing material improvements to the article
2654:
Toronto police said they made no safety recommendations
1833: 1819: 1573: 3497:
https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2024/09/16/7475392/
2906:
My proposal is to add a simple neutral sentence like "
160: 3000:
The position of the film director Anastasia Trofimova
1105:
This article has been checked against the following
967:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 862:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 639:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 479:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 3213:the film, in response to TIFF's claims of threats. 1440:
Is it possible to watch the film? If yes, then how?
1387:No, you are incorrect. Editors are allowed to use 1233:
Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force
1190: 1104: 174: 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 2983:A disbelieve in Trofimova's story in some media 2596:Censorship by Knowledge (XXG) editor, possible 1482:It's a documentary, not a popular fiction movie 304:. To improve this article, please refer to the 1329: 8: 2083:so it wasn't just us who were at the premier 1077:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Military history 3106:"Skandal v venetsii iz-za-Russkih-na-vojne" 1694:Ah, no longer needs amending - thanks eds! 3023: 1715: 1442:offered no context for the query, and it, 1346:anastrophe wants to censor the subject. 1187: 1101: 1018: 913: 808: 690: 585: 415: 300:. To use this banner, please refer to the 216: 3531:Canadian cinema articles needing an image 2040:My spouse and I, who were at the premier 1629:Introductory paragraph requires amendment 1057:This article is within the scope of the 398:This article needs an image (preferably 3546:French cinema articles needing an image 3489: 3272: 3190:was invoked but never defined (see the 3165:was invoked but never defined (see the 3143:was invoked but never defined (see the 3069: 2846: 2533: 1802: 1740: 1020: 915: 810: 692: 587: 571:This article is supported by the joint 417: 218: 188: 3626:Low-importance C-Class Russia articles 3581:Low-importance Canada-related articles 3298:https://tiff.net/programmers/anita-lee 2366: 2223: 2082: 1954:present during all press-conferences. 1850:There are more issues with your edit. 1439: 1432: 1067:. To use this banner, please see the 3179: 3177: 1579:Where in the source she saying that? 1434:removal per the talk page guidelines. 1080:Template:WikiProject Military history 7: 1494:to a plot summary (see WP:FILMPLOT). 1263:Warning: active arbitration remedies 981:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Politics 961:This article is within the scope of 856:This article is within the scope of 738:This article is within the scope of 633:This article is within the scope of 473:This article is within the scope of 282:This article is within the scope of 3561:War films articles needing an image 3526:Canadian cinema task force articles 3290:Anita Lee isn't a critical response 3289: 3182: 3157: 3135: 2982: 2676:just added to the article, cheers. 2194:The whole edit should be reverted. 876:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Ukraine 574:Canadian film and cinema task force 207:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 2495:That's from the press conference. 1773:suggest including this paragraph: 1769:Worth adding another Russian voice 771:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Russia 653:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject France 493:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Canada 14: 3671:C-Class military history articles 3541:French cinema task force articles 1310:Is it possible to watch the film? 378:This article is supported by the 358:This article is supported by the 338:This article is supported by the 50:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome! 3661:Low-importance politics articles 3521:C-Class Canadian cinema articles 3445:This new addition is incorrect' 3417: 3353: 1255: 1164: 1153: 1142: 1131: 1120: 1050: 1022: 948: 938: 917: 843: 833: 812: 725: 715: 694: 620: 610: 589: 538: 460: 450: 419: 314:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Film 298:regional and topical task forces 269: 259: 245: 220: 189: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 3646:Low-importance Ukraine articles 3591:Low-importance Ontario articles 3576:C-Class Canada-related articles 1875:- where's the source for that? 1001:This article has been rated as 896:This article has been rated as 791:This article has been rated as 673:This article has been rated as 513:This article has been rated as 3621:Low-importance Russia articles 3606:Low-importance France articles 3566:Film articles needing an image 3536:C-Class French cinema articles 3479:11:49, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 3461:06:26, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 3435:13:55, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 3411:03:29, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 3338:20:06, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 3324:21:19, 14 September 2024 (UTC) 3309:19:59, 14 September 2024 (UTC) 3263:19:50, 14 September 2024 (UTC) 3238:09:28, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3223:15:59, 14 September 2024 (UTC) 3059:20:04, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 3042:21:38, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 2968:21:32, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 2951:20:34, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 2936:20:32, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 2920:20:08, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 2837:19:10, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 2792:20:48, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 2777:20:37, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 2762:18:55, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 2748:18:52, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 2728:19:20, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 2714:19:11, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 2700:19:01, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 2686:05:51, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 2671:00:12, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 2646:21:27, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 2628:21:25, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 2613:22:28, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 2521:20:02, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 2507:20:01, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 2471:19:03, 14 September 2024 (UTC) 2456:18:55, 14 September 2024 (UTC) 2441:22:11, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 2426:22:06, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 2412:21:58, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 2394:21:52, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 2380:21:49, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 2362:21:47, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 2347:21:26, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 2333:21:24, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 2314:21:51, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 2299:21:24, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 2285:21:22, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 2270:08:47, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 2237:21:24, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 2219:21:16, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 2204:08:31, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 2169:20:08, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 2151:20:01, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 2137:20:00, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 2110:16:02, 14 September 2024 (UTC) 2096:22:08, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 2078:22:03, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 2064:21:58, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 2050:21:53, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 2036:21:16, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 2022:21:12, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 2007:08:24, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 1982:21:59, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 1964:21:56, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 1949:21:16, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 1935:21:11, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 1920:22:22, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 1906:21:33, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 1885:21:30, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 1868:21:29, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 1845:20:16, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 1793:16:06, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 1730:00:47, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 1704:14:46, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 1690:14:45, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 1675:13:57, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 1659:13:21, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 1621:19:51, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 1606:16:13, 14 September 2024 (UTC) 1589:21:14, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 1568:21:00, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 1553:13:54, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 1538:18:15, 11 September 2024 (UTC) 1508:16:39, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 1459:00:33, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 1422:23:05, 11 September 2024 (UTC) 1401:21:40, 11 September 2024 (UTC) 1383:17:14, 11 September 2024 (UTC) 1356:16:35, 11 September 2024 (UTC) 1340:15:48, 11 September 2024 (UTC) 1: 3666:WikiProject Politics articles 3556:War films task force articles 3387:List of wars involving Russia 1997:- where you take those from? 1362:presenting their own opinions 1324:19:39, 9 September 2024 (UTC) 1314:If yes, then how? Thanks, 1300:contentious topics procedures 984:Template:WikiProject Politics 975:and see a list of open tasks. 870:and see a list of open tasks. 647:and see a list of open tasks. 551:This article is supported by 487:and see a list of open tasks. 42:Put new text under old text. 3651:WikiProject Ukraine articles 3611:All WikiProject France pages 3596:All WikiProject Canada pages 3441:THR did not confirm anything 1835:, where the source says so? 1276:You must be logged-in to an 1060:Military history WikiProject 879:Template:WikiProject Ukraine 3636:WikiProject Russia articles 3376:to reactivate your request. 3364:has been answered. Set the 2883:The film was criticized as 774:Template:WikiProject Russia 656:Template:WikiProject France 496:Template:WikiProject Canada 404:non-free content guidelines 3697: 3551:C-Class war films articles 3384: 2875:Duplication of information 2183:I'm looking at the source 1288:purpose of Knowledge (XXG) 1125:Referencing and citation: 1007:project's importance scale 902:project's importance scale 797:project's importance scale 679:project's importance scale 519:project's importance scale 341:Canadian cinema task force 3656:C-Class politics articles 3571:WikiProject Film articles 3244:Another possible addition 2367:What part was misleading? 1680:Russian propaganda film. 1302:before editing this page. 1231: 1215: 1186: 1083:military history articles 1045: 1000: 933: 895: 828: 790: 748:dedicated to coverage of 710: 672: 605: 570: 534: 512: 445: 397: 377: 357: 337: 317:Template:WikiProject Film 254: 215: 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 3641:C-Class Ukraine articles 3586:C-Class Ontario articles 2973: 1296:normal editorial process 361:French cinema task force 3616:C-Class Russia articles 3601:C-Class France articles 3092:"The real Russia Today" 1543:That would make sense. 1191:Associated task forces: 1136:Coverage and accuracy: 761:, or contribute to the 499:Canada-related articles 3382:Please add a hatnote: 2819:Smoke Sauna Sisterhood 1896:- why was it removed? 1858:- why was it removed? 1342: 1292:standards of behaviour 1228: 1212: 1169:Supporting materials: 1097: 567: 531: 406:are properly observed. 394: 374: 354: 334: 197:This article is rated 75:avoid personal attacks 3516:C-Class film articles 2253:and replaced it with 1227: 1211: 1096: 566: 530: 393: 373: 353: 333: 201:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 100:Neutral point of view 3186:The named reference 3161:The named reference 3139:The named reference 2248:Historian Ian Garner 1524:"Critical" Response? 1217:War films task force 1039:Russian & Soviet 964:WikiProject Politics 752:on Knowledge (XXG). 381:War films task force 105:No original research 3466:We should also add: 3248:British journalist 1649:Please amend ASAP! 1158:Grammar and style: 1111:for B-class status: 859:WikiProject Ukraine 554:WikiProject Ontario 290:join the discussion 3124:The Globe and Mail 2885:Russian propaganda 1892:Ukrainian-Canadian 1278:extended confirmed 1268:contentious topics 1264: 1229: 1213: 1098: 1065:list of open tasks 763:project discussion 741:WikiProject Russia 636:WikiProject France 568: 532: 476:WikiProject Canada 395: 375: 355: 335: 203:content assessment 86:dispute resolution 47: 3380: 3379: 3205:Windsor paragraph 3044: 3028:comment added by 2245:You also removed 2086:How do you know? 1776:Russian director 1732: 1720:comment added by 1405:More relevant is 1367:original research 1307: 1306: 1262: 1250: 1249: 1246: 1245: 1242: 1241: 1238: 1237: 1182: 1181: 1138:criterion not met 1069:full instructions 1017: 1016: 1013: 1012: 987:politics articles 912: 911: 908: 907: 807: 806: 803: 802: 689: 688: 685: 684: 584: 583: 580: 579: 414: 413: 410: 409: 292:and see lists of 183: 182: 66:Assume good faith 43: 3688: 3499: 3494: 3425: 3421: 3420: 3398: 3371: 3367: 3357: 3356: 3350: 3282: 3277: 3197: 3196: 3195: 3189: 3181: 3172: 3171: 3170: 3164: 3156: 3150: 3149: 3148: 3142: 3134: 3128: 3127: 3116: 3110: 3109: 3102: 3096: 3095: 3088: 3082: 3081: 3074: 2867: 2862: 2856: 2851: 2588: 2587: 2580: 2574: 2573: 2566: 2560: 2559: 2552: 2546: 2545: 2538: 1812: 1807: 1761: 1756: 1750: 1745: 1456:an editor he is. 1380:an editor he is. 1364:. That's called 1338:an editor he is. 1259: 1252: 1198: 1188: 1172: 1168: 1167: 1161: 1157: 1156: 1150: 1146: 1145: 1139: 1135: 1134: 1128: 1124: 1123: 1102: 1085: 1084: 1081: 1078: 1075: 1074:Military history 1054: 1047: 1046: 1041: 1030:Military history 1026: 1019: 989: 988: 985: 982: 979: 958: 953: 952: 942: 935: 934: 929: 921: 914: 884: 883: 882:Ukraine articles 880: 877: 874: 853: 848: 847: 846: 837: 830: 829: 824: 816: 809: 779: 778: 775: 772: 769: 735: 730: 729: 728: 719: 712: 711: 706: 698: 691: 661: 660: 657: 654: 651: 630: 625: 624: 623: 614: 607: 606: 601: 593: 586: 548: 543: 542: 541: 501: 500: 497: 494: 491: 470: 465: 464: 463: 454: 447: 446: 441: 438: 423: 416: 322: 321: 318: 315: 312: 285:WikiProject Film 279: 274: 273: 272: 263: 256: 255: 250: 249: 248: 243: 224: 217: 200: 194: 193: 185: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 16: 3696: 3695: 3691: 3690: 3689: 3687: 3686: 3685: 3506: 3505: 3504: 3503: 3502: 3495: 3491: 3443: 3418: 3416: 3392: 3390: 3369: 3365: 3354: 3348: 3316:ManyAreasExpert 3292: 3287: 3286: 3285: 3278: 3274: 3246: 3207: 3202: 3201: 3200: 3187: 3185: 3183: 3175: 3162: 3160: 3158: 3153: 3140: 3138: 3136: 3131: 3118: 3117: 3113: 3104: 3103: 3099: 3090: 3089: 3085: 3076: 3075: 3071: 3002: 2985: 2976: 2877: 2872: 2871: 2870: 2863: 2859: 2852: 2848: 2806: 2720:ManyAreasExpert 2692:ManyAreasExpert 2656: 2638:ManyAreasExpert 2601: 2593: 2592: 2591: 2582: 2581: 2577: 2568: 2567: 2563: 2554: 2553: 2549: 2540: 2539: 2535: 2372:ManyAreasExpert 2339:ManyAreasExpert 2291:ManyAreasExpert 2262:ManyAreasExpert 2229:ManyAreasExpert 2196:ManyAreasExpert 2161:ManyAreasExpert 2088:ManyAreasExpert 2056:ManyAreasExpert 2028:ManyAreasExpert 1999:ManyAreasExpert 1974:ManyAreasExpert 1941:ManyAreasExpert 1912:104.158.225.146 1898:ManyAreasExpert 1877:ManyAreasExpert 1860:ManyAreasExpert 1837:ManyAreasExpert 1822: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1808: 1804: 1771: 1766: 1765: 1764: 1757: 1753: 1746: 1742: 1722:104.158.225.146 1631: 1581:ManyAreasExpert 1526: 1500:Daniel.Cardenas 1393:Daniel.Cardenas 1389:wp:common sense 1348:Daniel.Cardenas 1316:Daniel.Cardenas 1312: 1290:, any expected 1283: 1196: 1170: 1165: 1159: 1154: 1148: 1143: 1137: 1132: 1126: 1121: 1082: 1079: 1076: 1073: 1072: 1032: 986: 983: 980: 977: 976: 956:Politics portal 954: 947: 927: 881: 878: 875: 872: 871: 849: 844: 842: 822: 777:Russia articles 776: 773: 770: 767: 766: 755:To participate: 731: 726: 724: 704: 659:France articles 658: 655: 652: 649: 648: 626: 621: 619: 599: 544: 539: 537: 498: 495: 492: 489: 488: 466: 461: 459: 439: 429: 319: 316: 313: 310: 309: 275: 270: 268: 244: 230: 198: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 25:Russians at War 12: 11: 5: 3694: 3692: 3684: 3683: 3678: 3673: 3668: 3663: 3658: 3653: 3648: 3643: 3638: 3633: 3628: 3623: 3618: 3613: 3608: 3603: 3598: 3593: 3588: 3583: 3578: 3573: 3568: 3563: 3558: 3553: 3548: 3543: 3538: 3533: 3528: 3523: 3518: 3508: 3507: 3501: 3500: 3488: 3487: 3483: 3482: 3481: 3467: 3442: 3439: 3438: 3437: 3378: 3377: 3358: 3347: 3346:Edit protected 3344: 3343: 3342: 3341: 3340: 3291: 3288: 3284: 3283: 3271: 3270: 3266: 3245: 3242: 3241: 3240: 3206: 3203: 3199: 3198: 3173: 3151: 3129: 3111: 3097: 3083: 3068: 3067: 3063: 3062: 3061: 3001: 2998: 2990:RT Documentary 2984: 2981: 2975: 2972: 2971: 2970: 2955: 2954: 2953: 2876: 2873: 2869: 2868: 2857: 2845: 2844: 2840: 2817:, director of 2811: 2805: 2802: 2801: 2800: 2799: 2798: 2797: 2796: 2795: 2794: 2736: 2735: 2734: 2733: 2732: 2731: 2730: 2655: 2652: 2651: 2650: 2649: 2648: 2600: 2594: 2590: 2589: 2575: 2561: 2547: 2532: 2531: 2527: 2526: 2525: 2524: 2523: 2493: 2492: 2491: 2490: 2489: 2488: 2487: 2486: 2485: 2484: 2483: 2482: 2481: 2480: 2479: 2478: 2477: 2476: 2475: 2474: 2473: 2399: 2369: 2320: 2319: 2318: 2317: 2316: 2252: 2243: 2242: 2241: 2240: 2239: 2226: 2186:and it writes 2177: 2176: 2175: 2174: 2173: 2172: 2171: 2124: 2123: 2122: 2121: 2120: 2119: 2118: 2117: 2116: 2115: 2114: 2113: 2112: 2085: 2026:Who are "we"? 1992: 1991: 1990: 1989: 1988: 1987: 1986: 1985: 1984: 1908: 1887: 1870: 1821: 1818: 1814: 1813: 1801: 1800: 1796: 1770: 1767: 1763: 1762: 1751: 1739: 1738: 1734: 1711: 1710: 1709: 1708: 1707: 1706: 1648: 1630: 1627: 1626: 1625: 1624: 1623: 1593: 1592: 1591: 1555: 1525: 1522: 1521: 1520: 1519: 1518: 1517: 1516: 1515: 1514: 1513: 1512: 1511: 1510: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1485: 1484: 1483: 1476: 1475: 1474: 1468: 1467: 1466: 1438:Simply asking 1436: 1410: 1343: 1311: 1308: 1305: 1304: 1282: 1281: 1273: 1260: 1248: 1247: 1244: 1243: 1240: 1239: 1236: 1235: 1230: 1220: 1219: 1214: 1204: 1203: 1201: 1199: 1193: 1192: 1184: 1183: 1180: 1179: 1177: 1175: 1174: 1173: 1162: 1151: 1140: 1129: 1115: 1114: 1112: 1099: 1089: 1088: 1086: 1055: 1043: 1042: 1027: 1015: 1014: 1011: 1010: 1003:Low-importance 999: 993: 992: 990: 973:the discussion 960: 959: 943: 931: 930: 928:Low‑importance 922: 910: 909: 906: 905: 898:Low-importance 894: 888: 887: 885: 868:the discussion 855: 854: 851:Ukraine portal 838: 826: 825: 823:Low‑importance 817: 805: 804: 801: 800: 793:Low-importance 789: 783: 782: 780: 753: 737: 736: 720: 708: 707: 705:Low‑importance 699: 687: 686: 683: 682: 675:Low-importance 671: 665: 664: 662: 645:the discussion 632: 631: 615: 603: 602: 600:Low‑importance 594: 582: 581: 578: 577: 569: 559: 558: 550: 549: 546:Ontario portal 533: 523: 522: 515:Low-importance 511: 505: 504: 502: 485:the discussion 472: 471: 455: 443: 442: 440:Low‑importance 424: 412: 411: 408: 407: 396: 386: 385: 376: 366: 365: 356: 346: 345: 336: 326: 325: 323: 281: 280: 264: 252: 251: 225: 213: 212: 206: 195: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3693: 3682: 3679: 3677: 3674: 3672: 3669: 3667: 3664: 3662: 3659: 3657: 3654: 3652: 3649: 3647: 3644: 3642: 3639: 3637: 3634: 3632: 3629: 3627: 3624: 3622: 3619: 3617: 3614: 3612: 3609: 3607: 3604: 3602: 3599: 3597: 3594: 3592: 3589: 3587: 3584: 3582: 3579: 3577: 3574: 3572: 3569: 3567: 3564: 3562: 3559: 3557: 3554: 3552: 3549: 3547: 3544: 3542: 3539: 3537: 3534: 3532: 3529: 3527: 3524: 3522: 3519: 3517: 3514: 3513: 3511: 3498: 3493: 3490: 3486: 3480: 3476: 3472: 3468: 3465: 3464: 3463: 3462: 3458: 3454: 3449: 3446: 3440: 3436: 3432: 3428: 3424: 3415: 3414: 3413: 3412: 3408: 3404: 3399: 3396: 3388: 3383: 3375: 3372:parameter to 3363: 3359: 3352: 3351: 3345: 3339: 3335: 3331: 3327: 3326: 3325: 3321: 3317: 3313: 3312: 3311: 3310: 3306: 3302: 3299: 3295: 3281: 3276: 3273: 3269: 3265: 3264: 3260: 3256: 3251: 3243: 3239: 3235: 3231: 3227: 3226: 3225: 3224: 3220: 3216: 3210: 3204: 3193: 3180: 3178: 3174: 3168: 3155: 3152: 3146: 3133: 3130: 3125: 3121: 3115: 3112: 3107: 3101: 3098: 3093: 3087: 3084: 3079: 3073: 3070: 3066: 3060: 3056: 3052: 3047: 3046: 3045: 3043: 3039: 3035: 3031: 3027: 3021: 3017: 3014: 3011: 3008: 3005: 2999: 2997: 2993: 2991: 2980: 2969: 2965: 2961: 2956: 2952: 2948: 2944: 2939: 2938: 2937: 2933: 2929: 2924: 2923: 2922: 2921: 2917: 2913: 2912:UrbanVillager 2909: 2904: 2900: 2897: 2896: 2892: 2889: 2888: 2886: 2880: 2874: 2866: 2861: 2858: 2855: 2850: 2847: 2843: 2839: 2838: 2834: 2830: 2825: 2822: 2820: 2816: 2809: 2803: 2793: 2789: 2785: 2780: 2779: 2778: 2774: 2770: 2765: 2764: 2763: 2759: 2755: 2751: 2750: 2749: 2745: 2741: 2737: 2729: 2725: 2721: 2717: 2716: 2715: 2711: 2707: 2703: 2702: 2701: 2697: 2693: 2689: 2688: 2687: 2683: 2679: 2675: 2674: 2673: 2672: 2668: 2664: 2661: 2653: 2647: 2643: 2639: 2635: 2631: 2630: 2629: 2625: 2621: 2617: 2616: 2615: 2614: 2610: 2606: 2599: 2595: 2585: 2579: 2576: 2571: 2565: 2562: 2557: 2551: 2548: 2543: 2537: 2534: 2530: 2522: 2518: 2514: 2513:UrbanVillager 2510: 2509: 2508: 2504: 2500: 2499:UrbanVillager 2497: 2494: 2472: 2468: 2464: 2459: 2458: 2457: 2453: 2449: 2444: 2443: 2442: 2438: 2434: 2429: 2428: 2427: 2423: 2419: 2415: 2414: 2413: 2409: 2405: 2400: 2397: 2396: 2395: 2391: 2387: 2383: 2382: 2381: 2377: 2373: 2368: 2365: 2364: 2363: 2359: 2355: 2350: 2349: 2348: 2344: 2340: 2336: 2335: 2334: 2330: 2326: 2321: 2315: 2311: 2307: 2302: 2301: 2300: 2296: 2292: 2288: 2287: 2286: 2282: 2278: 2273: 2272: 2271: 2267: 2263: 2260: 2257: 2251: 2249: 2244: 2238: 2234: 2230: 2225: 2222: 2221: 2220: 2216: 2212: 2207: 2206: 2205: 2201: 2197: 2193: 2191: 2185: 2182: 2178: 2170: 2166: 2162: 2158: 2154: 2153: 2152: 2148: 2144: 2140: 2139: 2138: 2134: 2130: 2125: 2111: 2107: 2103: 2099: 2098: 2097: 2093: 2089: 2084: 2081: 2080: 2079: 2075: 2071: 2067: 2066: 2065: 2061: 2057: 2053: 2052: 2051: 2047: 2043: 2039: 2038: 2037: 2033: 2029: 2025: 2024: 2023: 2019: 2015: 2010: 2009: 2008: 2004: 2000: 1996: 1993: 1983: 1979: 1975: 1971: 1967: 1966: 1965: 1961: 1957: 1952: 1951: 1950: 1946: 1942: 1938: 1937: 1936: 1932: 1928: 1923: 1922: 1921: 1917: 1913: 1909: 1907: 1903: 1899: 1895: 1893: 1888: 1886: 1882: 1878: 1874: 1871: 1869: 1865: 1861: 1857: 1853: 1849: 1848: 1847: 1846: 1842: 1838: 1834: 1831: 1827: 1826:UrbanVillager 1811: 1806: 1803: 1799: 1795: 1794: 1790: 1786: 1782: 1779: 1778:Vitaly Mansky 1774: 1768: 1760: 1755: 1752: 1749: 1744: 1741: 1737: 1733: 1731: 1727: 1723: 1719: 1705: 1701: 1697: 1693: 1692: 1691: 1687: 1683: 1678: 1677: 1676: 1672: 1668: 1663: 1662: 1661: 1660: 1656: 1652: 1646: 1642: 1639: 1635: 1628: 1622: 1618: 1614: 1609: 1608: 1607: 1603: 1599: 1594: 1590: 1586: 1582: 1578: 1574: 1571: 1570: 1569: 1565: 1561: 1556: 1554: 1550: 1546: 1542: 1541: 1540: 1539: 1535: 1531: 1523: 1509: 1505: 1501: 1498: 1492: 1491: 1490: 1486: 1481: 1480: 1477: 1472: 1471: 1469: 1464: 1463: 1462: 1461: 1460: 1457: 1453: 1449: 1445: 1441: 1437: 1435: 1430: 1425: 1424: 1423: 1419: 1415: 1411: 1408: 1404: 1403: 1402: 1398: 1394: 1390: 1386: 1385: 1384: 1381: 1377: 1373: 1369: 1368: 1363: 1359: 1358: 1357: 1353: 1349: 1344: 1341: 1339: 1335: 1328: 1327: 1326: 1325: 1321: 1317: 1309: 1303: 1301: 1297: 1293: 1289: 1284: 1279: 1275: 1274: 1271: 1269: 1261: 1258: 1254: 1253: 1234: 1226: 1222: 1221: 1218: 1210: 1206: 1205: 1202: 1200: 1195: 1194: 1189: 1185: 1178: 1176: 1171:criterion met 1163: 1160:criterion met 1152: 1149:criterion met 1141: 1130: 1127:criterion met 1119: 1118: 1117: 1116: 1113: 1110: 1109: 1103: 1100: 1095: 1091: 1090: 1087: 1070: 1066: 1062: 1061: 1056: 1053: 1049: 1048: 1044: 1040: 1036: 1031: 1028: 1025: 1021: 1008: 1004: 998: 995: 994: 991: 974: 970: 966: 965: 957: 951: 946: 944: 941: 937: 936: 932: 926: 923: 920: 916: 903: 899: 893: 890: 889: 886: 869: 865: 861: 860: 852: 841: 839: 836: 832: 831: 827: 821: 818: 815: 811: 798: 794: 788: 785: 784: 781: 764: 760: 756: 751: 747: 743: 742: 734: 733:Russia portal 723: 721: 718: 714: 713: 709: 703: 700: 697: 693: 680: 676: 670: 667: 666: 663: 646: 642: 638: 637: 629: 628:France portal 618: 616: 613: 609: 608: 604: 598: 595: 592: 588: 576: 575: 565: 561: 560: 556: 555: 547: 536: 529: 525: 524: 520: 516: 510: 507: 506: 503: 486: 482: 478: 477: 469: 468:Canada portal 458: 456: 453: 449: 448: 444: 437: 433: 428: 425: 422: 418: 405: 401: 392: 388: 387: 383: 382: 372: 368: 367: 363: 362: 352: 348: 347: 343: 342: 332: 328: 327: 324: 320:film articles 307: 303: 302:documentation 299: 295: 291: 287: 286: 278: 267: 265: 262: 258: 257: 253: 242: 238: 234: 229: 226: 223: 219: 214: 210: 204: 196: 192: 187: 186: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 3492: 3484: 3450: 3447: 3444: 3422: 3403:64.229.88.34 3400: 3391: 3381: 3373: 3362:edit request 3296: 3293: 3275: 3267: 3250:Edward Lucas 3247: 3211: 3208: 3184:Cite error: 3159:Cite error: 3154: 3137:Cite error: 3132: 3123: 3114: 3100: 3086: 3072: 3064: 3024:— Preceding 3022: 3018: 3015: 3012: 3009: 3006: 3003: 2994: 2986: 2977: 2907: 2905: 2901: 2898: 2894: 2893: 2890: 2882: 2881: 2878: 2860: 2849: 2841: 2826: 2823: 2810: 2807: 2754:62.197.35.21 2657: 2602: 2578: 2564: 2550: 2536: 2528: 2255: 2254: 2247: 2246: 2189: 2187: 2180: 1994: 1889: 1872: 1851: 1829: 1828:, you added 1823: 1805: 1797: 1783: 1775: 1772: 1754: 1743: 1735: 1716:— Preceding 1712: 1696:62.197.35.21 1647: 1643: 1640: 1636: 1632: 1576: 1527: 1487:Quote from: 1448:WP:NOTAFORUM 1443: 1429:WP:NOTAFORUM 1407:MOS:FILMPLOT 1371: 1365: 1361: 1330: 1313: 1285: 1272: 1265: 1106: 1058: 1002: 962: 897: 857: 792: 759:project page 754: 739: 674: 634: 572: 552: 514: 474: 379: 359: 339: 283: 209:WikiProjects 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 3427:Bunnypranav 2663:Stoptheprop 2605:Stoptheprop 2586:. euronews. 2558:. Deadline. 2188:"This film 1854:sourced to 1824:Greetings @ 1147:Structure: 746:WikiProject 277:Film portal 148:free images 31:not a forum 3510:Categories 3485:References 3366:|answered= 3268:References 3065:References 2842:References 2815:Anna Hints 2572:. Returns. 2544:. Variety. 2529:References 2256:Some media 2179:You write 1798:References 1736:References 1572:Your edit 1452:anastrophe 1376:anastrophe 1334:anastrophe 306:guidelines 294:open tasks 3192:help page 3167:help page 3145:help page 2808:Suggest: 2678:Tdmurlock 1444:in itself 1294:, or any 1035:War films 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 3038:contribs 3026:unsigned 2157:WP:PROOF 1970:WP:PROOF 1939:proofs? 1718:unsigned 1530:Thrilway 1108:criteria 978:Politics 969:politics 925:Politics 233:Canadian 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 3141:Barbera 2769:Bearcat 2740:Bearcat 2634:WP:LEAD 2259:Defense 1005:on the 900:on the 873:Ukraine 864:Ukraine 820:Ukraine 795:on the 677:on the 517:on the 432:Ontario 199:C-class 154:WP refs 142:scholar 3471:0lida0 3453:0lida0 3330:Volunt 3301:0lida0 3255:0lida0 3230:0lida0 3215:0lida0 3051:Volunt 3030:EVS-VR 2960:EVS-VR 2943:0lida0 2928:0lida0 2829:0lida0 2784:0lida0 2706:0lida0 2620:EVS-VR 2598:WP:COI 2463:0lida0 2448:EVS-VR 2433:0lida0 2418:EVS-VR 2404:0lida0 2386:EVS-VR 2354:EVS-VR 2325:EVS-VR 2306:EVS-VR 2277:EVS-VR 2211:EVS-VR 2143:Volunt 2129:Volunt 2102:EVS-VR 2070:EVS-VR 2042:EVS-VR 2014:EVS-VR 1956:EVS-VR 1927:EVS-VR 1785:0lida0 1682:0lida0 1667:Adebax 1651:0lida0 1613:Volunt 1598:EVS-VR 1575:added 1560:EVS-VR 1545:Adebax 1414:Nardog 768:Russia 750:Russia 702:Russia 650:France 641:France 597:France 490:Canada 481:Canada 436:Cinema 427:Canada 237:French 205:scale. 126:Google 3395:about 3370:|ans= 3360:This 3020:war. 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 3475:talk 3457:talk 3431:talk 3423:Done 3407:talk 3334:talk 3320:talk 3305:talk 3259:talk 3234:talk 3219:talk 3055:talk 3034:talk 2964:talk 2947:talk 2932:talk 2916:talk 2833:talk 2788:talk 2773:talk 2758:talk 2744:talk 2724:talk 2710:talk 2696:talk 2682:talk 2667:talk 2642:talk 2632:See 2624:talk 2609:talk 2517:talk 2503:talk 2467:talk 2452:talk 2437:talk 2422:talk 2408:talk 2390:talk 2376:talk 2358:talk 2343:talk 2329:talk 2310:talk 2295:talk 2281:talk 2266:talk 2233:talk 2227:No. 2215:talk 2200:talk 2165:talk 2155:See 2147:talk 2133:talk 2106:talk 2092:talk 2074:talk 2060:talk 2046:talk 2032:talk 2018:talk 2003:talk 1978:talk 1968:See 1960:talk 1945:talk 1931:talk 1916:talk 1902:talk 1881:talk 1864:talk 1841:talk 1789:talk 1726:talk 1700:talk 1686:talk 1671:talk 1655:talk 1617:talk 1602:talk 1585:talk 1564:talk 1549:talk 1534:talk 1504:talk 1418:talk 1397:talk 1352:talk 1320:talk 1266:The 744:, a 400:free 311:Film 296:and 228:Film 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 3401:-- 3368:or 3163:BBC 2824:-- 1641:OR 997:Low 892:Low 787:Low 669:Low 509:Low 241:War 176:TWL 3512:: 3477:) 3459:) 3433:) 3409:) 3393:{{ 3374:no 3336:) 3322:) 3307:) 3261:) 3236:) 3221:) 3194:). 3188:DL 3176:^ 3169:). 3147:). 3122:. 3057:) 3040:) 3036:• 2966:) 2949:) 2934:) 2918:) 2835:) 2821:. 2790:) 2775:) 2760:) 2746:) 2726:) 2712:) 2698:) 2684:) 2669:) 2644:) 2636:. 2626:) 2611:) 2519:) 2505:) 2469:) 2454:) 2439:) 2424:) 2410:) 2392:) 2378:) 2360:) 2345:) 2331:) 2312:) 2297:) 2283:) 2268:) 2235:) 2217:) 2202:) 2167:) 2159:. 2149:) 2135:) 2108:) 2094:) 2076:) 2062:) 2048:) 2034:) 2020:) 2005:) 1980:) 1972:. 1962:) 1947:) 1933:) 1918:) 1904:) 1883:) 1866:) 1843:) 1832:- 1791:) 1728:) 1702:) 1688:) 1673:) 1657:) 1619:) 1604:) 1587:) 1566:) 1551:) 1536:) 1506:) 1454:, 1431:: 1420:) 1399:) 1378:, 1354:) 1336:, 1322:) 1197:/ 1037:/ 1033:: 434:/ 430:: 239:/ 235:/ 231:: 156:) 54:; 3473:( 3455:( 3429:( 3405:( 3389:. 3332:( 3318:( 3303:( 3257:( 3232:( 3217:( 3126:. 3108:. 3094:. 3080:. 3053:( 3032:( 2962:( 2945:( 2930:( 2914:( 2831:( 2786:( 2771:( 2756:( 2742:( 2722:( 2708:( 2694:( 2680:( 2665:( 2640:( 2622:( 2607:( 2515:( 2501:( 2465:( 2450:( 2435:( 2420:( 2406:( 2388:( 2374:( 2356:( 2341:( 2327:( 2308:( 2293:( 2279:( 2264:( 2231:( 2213:( 2198:( 2163:( 2145:( 2131:( 2104:( 2090:( 2072:( 2058:( 2044:( 2030:( 2016:( 2001:( 1976:( 1958:( 1943:( 1929:( 1914:( 1900:( 1879:( 1862:( 1839:( 1787:( 1724:( 1698:( 1684:( 1669:( 1653:( 1615:( 1600:( 1583:( 1562:( 1547:( 1532:( 1502:( 1416:( 1395:( 1350:( 1318:( 1071:. 1009:. 904:. 799:. 765:. 681:. 557:. 521:. 384:. 364:. 344:. 308:. 211:: 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 58:.

Index

talk page
Russians at War
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL

content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Film
Canadian
French

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.