1158:(last one was in June 2021), though the issue you reverted doesn't seem to have been as directly harmful vandalism as you claim, with a change from "doing business as" to "traded as", which essentially convey/mean the same thing despite DBA being mainly the dominantly-used American term. External opinions aside, please take up the protection request at the dedicated page for it if you feel it is strongly desired/necessary. You are always welcome to contribute and cleanup this article yourself if you spot any further issues, and you can request for other contributors to help in editing at one of the WikiProjects which cover this article (
1388:. Very confused at the strength of the objections above; moves on this logic have routinely succeeded elsewhere. It's very common for an entity to have had one name for very long period of time, another name in their fading twilight years, and Knowledge to favor the majority-tenure name. It's a little wacky in this case because WarnerMedia was not a minor corporation at all, existing in the Internet age, so there's plenty of sources using "WarnerMedia", but the nominator's logic is sound. Time Warner was not a minor company, and its 28 years of existence should count for more than the 3.5 years of being WarnerMedia.
1525:
with "WarnerMedia" and use that throughout? Unlikely, it's gonna be called "The Full
History of Time Warner". I'm the one who's presented a recent, contemporary source using "Time Warner" in the obituary above. To be clear, I wasn't cherry-picking, I was searching for both variants with "site:nytimes.com" attached, and Time Warner had the more recent hit. (I can find some uses of "WarnerMedia" on Google News, sure, but they're all stuff like "Former WarnerMedia executive" talking about WBD still - not historic overviews which is what this article is.)
776:
755:
998:
558:
908:
887:
786:
1475:. Now, you're going to argue that Levin wasn't chief when WarnerMedia was around, and that's true, but that's also exactly the point. MOST of the stuff that happened to most of the people were when WarnerMedia wasn't around. The last 3.5 years were impactful, but the previous 28 were even more impactful, and I expect that the "Time Warner" name will predominate - we won't anachronistically call Time Warner "WarnerMedia" for those.
918:
1635:, about related (but not instantly applicable) naming conventions, I wanted to solve an issue that affected some defunct radio stations. Most U.S. radio station articles are call sign–titled at the current—or, in the case of a defunct station, final—call sign used. That results in some issues where the final call sign used may have been so brief as to not be a common name or a title that surprises a reader. For instance,
637:
375:
203:
286:
265:
234:
296:
1166:). I do not believe a permanent protection request is in order, though, as this article does not seem to have a clear history of systemic abuse that would warrant such an action, per the criteria addressed here, though I would still take it up with RPP and would advise requesting semi-protection instead, which is more likely to be accepted in the interim.
548:
527:
1424:
Sources written when the company was Time Warner will use "Time Warner"; more recent sources written when the company was WarnerMedia will use "WarnerMedia". The best sources would be the most recent, written after the dissolution and from a retrospective POV; admittedly, I've had a hard time finding
1223:
directly addresses the overall issue of this discussion, but does not take into account historical significance. Given that, the community may benefit in the future from looking into including additional guidance for similar situations, otherwise contentious RM's involving the policy will always need
1439:
Most sources point to WarnerMedia being the common name of the entity. The fact that sources do not use "TimeWarner" to refer to WarnerMedia is because that has not been the common name in recent years and is unlikely to return to it in years following when sources look back upon the transition from
1092:
Would it be possible if we add more companies to the list of Parent
Companies? Also, was Time Warner AOL, Inc. a publicly trading company or was it owned by AOL. There are some inconsistencies in the article that make it hard to tell. Specifically: "AOL stock fell from $ 220 Billion to $ 20 Billion"
1524:
that if someone writes a big article in 2030 titled "The Full
History of WarnerMedia, 1990-2022", that'd be great evidence that WarnerMedia is the COMMONNAME. But writing that out explains the problem, right? Do you really think that business journalist writing that article is going to title that
1567:
We will have to agree to disagree, but see above for my earlier comments: if you agree that the recent obituary used Time Warner because it was contemporary to the time of Levin, then how much more will that be true for any future works on the topic of Time Warner / WarnerMedia (aka this article's
1489:
Not sure what part of my response you deem to be "hostile", though I'm going to ignore your presumptions here and focus on the RM. Of course the name used for 28 years would be used in more sources, although we cannot ignore the most-recent name that was used before the company went defunct. Per
1465:
your crystal ball is accurate and sources in the future refer to the entity as "WarnerMedia" rather than "Time Warner" in retrospectives and coverage of the firm, then sure. But I'm very much the reverse of you - why are you so certain that they will and that this is the common name? There are
1639:
got that title because its last two call signs were not often used, one of them in the final five days of the facility's life; had been relocated from much longer uses (both in Toledo, Ohio!); and it made way more sense to use the call sign associated with the station for 63 of its 69 years of
1652:
does not contain much guidance about this scenario, when a company or entity changes its name in the final years of existence. At some point, we cross a threshold from living entity to defunct entity, and 162 etc. is correct in ascertaining a difference in treatment. In ProQuest, a search for
1552:
ought to remain intact and it is probably best to wait and see which name sources use in years to come. As for the obituary, they used the TimeWarner name because that was the name of the company when he worked there, so I do not think that is reflective of contemporary coverage and is more
1300:
of this defunct business and should not be changed. The Time Warner name is already covered for when it was used. We do not place more emphasis on one former name just because someone thinks we should. The article isn't titled "Warner
Communications" or "AOL TimeWarner" for the same reason.
1470:
of sources using "Time Warner" and just 3.5 years of sources using "WarnerMedia." A quick Google for news coverage on "WarnerMedia" shows largely contemporary references to WarnerMedia at the moment of the merger, but searching for "Time Warner" gets stuff like this news story:
1500:. If, on the other hand, reliable sources written after the name change is announced continue to use the established name when discussing the article topic in the present day, Knowledge should continue to do so as well, as described above at § Use commonly recognizable names.
1456:
This is a weirdly hostile response. The general principle is one that is noncontroversial elsewhere, far from "I found a single exception somewhere." Suppose that Time Warner had lasted 100 years rather than 28? 1000 years? To me this implies the possibility of a
1052:
I suggest making a link/comment at the beginning of the article to Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. because WarnerMedia was spun off and merged with
Discovery, Inc. on April 8, 2022. That way it would be clearer that the company is now called Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc.
1502:"WarnerMedia" is the most recent contemporary name used by reliable sources and has been routinely used. While "TimeWarner" has more uses overall due to its longer history under that name, we cannot simply ignore the most recent name and our naming conventions.
1539:
A few sources published since the name change using the former name is not uncommon, and I don't think that one source you provided is enough to reverse the name that has stood unchallenged for the past 5 years, which signals an
1320:
I believe that the article isn't named as AOL Time warner, TimeWarner, or Warner
Communications, all happened pre-AT&T. Just as WarnerMedia is a defunct entity doesn't mean that previous name pre-AT&T era should be used.
1112:
I just caught some obvious vandalism in the lead sentence which was inserted on 30 December 2021 from a now-blocked IP address. Apparently no one had caught it for over two years. And that was just the first paragraph.
1256:
of a defunct entity, we must consider its entire existence. This company was known as "Time Warner" from 1990 until 2018 (including a span as "AOL Time Warner" 2001–2003), but as "WarnerMedia" for less than 4 years.
1568:
topic). If they simply adopt a policy of always using the contemporary company name, then some back-of-the-envelope math suggests they'll use Time Warner 85-90% of the time, and WarnerMedia 10-15% of the time.
153:
725:
1054:
393:
1644:
by the "final call sign of broadcast" rule was KCOE (AM), but its sole programming under that call sign was a loop advising listeners to retune their radios as the facility was being dismantled.
496:
1767:
1496:
Sometimes the subject of an article will undergo a change of name. When this occurs, we give extra weight to independent, reliable, English-language sources written after the name change.
1410:
holds precedence that if sources show the new name has become more common in the years since the name change, that should be used. This is not about what name was used the longest.
816:
1347:
1219:
It was noted here that other cases have existed on
Knowledge where consensus determined the opposite of this RM (so historical significance was favored over contemporary usage) -
833:
194:
147:
1782:
1762:
1227:
974:
964:
869:
859:
1296:: Common name does not apply here as no sources refer to the predecessor of WBD that was owned by AT&T as Time Warner, which was pre-AT&T. This is the
1787:
1772:
1128:. So it looks like very few regular editors are monitoring this article and the vandals are running amok. This article needs to be permanently protected.
823:
432:
419:
1498:
If the reliable sources written after the change is announced routinely use the new name, Knowledge should follow suit and change relevant titles to match
352:
79:
1732:
342:
940:
828:
1777:
1757:
1747:
1737:
604:
614:
1216:, leaning on contemporary sources using the newer name despite a reportedly significant historical usage of the proposed (and former) title.
85:
1548:
to gauge which name will be used in a historical perspective given WarnerMedia only became defunct and merged two years ago, so I think the
1322:
1159:
406:
318:
1199:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
1752:
931:
892:
799:
760:
426:
44:
1058:
811:
1727:
1636:
1003:
This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.
1672:
1163:
1033:
580:
1742:
683:
309:
270:
99:
30:
1691:
689:
487:
104:
20:
807:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
1714:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
168:
74:
649:
400:
387:
245:
135:
1541:
571:
532:
413:
65:
1592:
I think SnowFire's explanations are good. I can understand why some people will want to oppose this. Maybe we can do
1648:
avoided being "KMCS (Kansas)" because its notoriety and most of its broadcasting occurred under the other call sign.
939:-related articles on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1403:
1019:
202:
190:
185:
1190:
213:
1593:
1558:
1507:
1458:
1445:
1415:
1326:
1306:
1171:
129:
1077:
696:
109:
1375:
1297:
1069:
459:
1472:
1687:
1517:
1491:
1407:
1339:
1220:
1213:
1200:
710:
576:
439:
251:
125:
1668:
1649:
1355:
1253:
1133:
923:
791:
233:
1601:
1554:
1549:
1503:
1441:
1411:
1302:
1284:
1167:
175:
161:
55:
1275:
Reverting to a prior name, post-dissolution makes no sense. Time Warner can also be confused with
1203:
after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
655:
579:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
317:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1698:
1615:
1573:
1530:
1480:
1430:
1393:
1262:
1125:
1098:
1073:
672:
218:
70:
775:
754:
1367:. Reusing a name from a company that no longer exists is strange. The title is perfectly fine.
1545:
1368:
1276:
1232:
1121:
706:
662:
563:
51:
445:
301:
215:
1662:
1631:
I am surprised at the strenuous nature of the objections myself. When I wrote the current
1351:
1145:
1129:
668:
476:
141:
1632:
1597:
1280:
636:
452:
374:
907:
886:
1721:
1611:
1569:
1526:
1476:
1426:
1389:
1258:
1151:
1094:
936:
804:
1117:
1661:
turns up 54,388 results. There is a NAMECHANGES case, but I lightly lean support.
1243:
1029:
24:
1015:
913:
781:
702:
676:
553:
291:
1641:
1610:
No, that would not work. Parentheticals are used for disambiguation only.
803:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
314:
285:
264:
217:
1342:, which say that we should give greater weight to sources published
1704:
1676:
1619:
1605:
1577:
1562:
1534:
1511:
1484:
1449:
1434:
1419:
1406:
on Knowledge does not mean the same should apply to this instance.
1397:
1380:
1359:
1330:
1310:
1288:
1266:
1237:
1175:
1137:
1102:
1081:
1062:
1473:
Gerald M. Levin, Time Warner Chief in a Merger Debacle, Dies at 84
1645:
1072:
has its own article. It is linked near the bottom of the lead.
992:
547:
526:
227:
219:
15:
1350:
refer to this company as "WarnerMedia", not "Time Warner". –
394:
Knowledge:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
1155:
1116:
The underlying problem seems to be that no one cares about
1248:
1279:. The current title is concise and factually correct.
160:
1516:
To be more clear: You and various others have cited
935:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
575:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
313:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1348:
Most of the sources published after the name change
1768:B-Class United States articles of Mid-importance
1150:You can submit a request for page protection at
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
1120:and their crummy movies ever since they lost
174:
8:
433:Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
420:Category:Company articles needing attention
1189:The following is a closed discussion of a
881:
749:
644:Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
622:
521:
382:Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
360:
259:
1404:something similar has been done elsewhere
1224:to be handled on a case-by-case basis.
1108:This article needs permanent protection
1055:2A02:21B4:14E4:4500:CCEE:728B:D45A:9B1D
883:
751:
523:
261:
231:
1495:
1783:Mid-importance New York City articles
1763:Mid-importance United States articles
1520:, but this was never under dispute.
458:Help expand stub articles located at
7:
1208:The result of the move request was:
1160:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Companies
929:This article is within the scope of
797:This article is within the scope of
569:This article is within the scope of
407:Category:Unassessed company articles
307:This article is within the scope of
1068:WBD is a separate entity, and thus
949:Knowledge:WikiProject New York City
844:Knowledge:WikiProject United States
250:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
1788:WikiProject New York City articles
1773:WikiProject United States articles
1154:, not here. This article has been
952:Template:WikiProject New York City
847:Template:WikiProject United States
14:
1637:WHSC (Hartsville, South Carolina)
1733:High-importance company articles
1710:The discussion above is closed.
1164:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Media
1088:Ownership history of WarnerMedia
996:
916:
906:
885:
784:
774:
753:
635:
556:
546:
525:
484:Tag company talk pages with the
373:
294:
284:
263:
232:
201:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
969:This article has been rated as
864:This article has been rated as
609:This article has been rated as
347:This article has been rated as
327:Knowledge:WikiProject Companies
1778:B-Class New York City articles
1758:B-Class United States articles
1748:High-importance Media articles
1738:WikiProject Companies articles
1228:closed by non-admin page mover
1093:Did you mean AOL Time Warner?
690:Content (media and publishing)
473:Tag company articles with the
330:Template:WikiProject Companies
1:
1657:turns up 372,000 hits, while
943:and see a list of open tasks.
626:WikiProject Media To-do List:
583:and see a list of open tasks.
321:and see a list of open tasks.
42:Put new text under old text.
1182:Requested move 3 August 2024
364:WikiProject Companies To-do:
1620:16:33, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
1606:07:21, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
1553:historical in that regard.
1238:16:42, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
1212:Not moved based largely on
589:Knowledge:WikiProject Media
50:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
1804:
1753:WikiProject Media articles
1705:01:19, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
1677:07:03, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
1578:08:10, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
1563:23:28, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
1535:16:32, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
1512:14:04, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
1485:02:03, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
1450:20:23, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
1435:20:16, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
1420:18:49, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
1398:18:43, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
1381:15:47, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
1360:15:08, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
1331:02:00, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
1311:23:22, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
1289:23:16, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
1267:19:38, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
1176:18:28, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
1138:14:43, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
975:project's importance scale
870:project's importance scale
615:project's importance scale
592:Template:WikiProject Media
353:project's importance scale
1594:WarnerMedia (Time Warner)
1103:18:11, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
1082:18:01, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
1063:11:55, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
968:
932:WikiProject New York City
901:
863:
800:WikiProject United States
769:
621:
608:
541:
359:
346:
279:
258:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
1728:B-Class company articles
1712:Please do not modify it.
1196:Please do not modify it.
805:United States of America
1655:"Time Warner" NOT cable
1252:– When considering the
1743:B-Class Media articles
1440:WarnerMedia into WBD.
1070:Warner Bros. Discovery
955:New York City articles
850:United States articles
460:Category:Company stubs
240:This article is rated
75:avoid personal attacks
1544:. It may be a little
1494:, (bolded my point) "
1156:protected in the past
726:requests for comments
711:Alternative newspaper
497:requests for comments
488:WikiProject Companies
310:WikiProject Companies
195:Auto-archiving period
100:Neutral point of view
1542:WP:IMPLICITCONSENSUS
1461:. Now, to be sure,
1028:, 3 August 2024, to
1014:, November 2014, to
924:New York City portal
792:United States portal
105:No original research
818:Articles Requested!
1346:the name changes.
1126:Universal Pictures
673:Video game culture
246:content assessment
86:dispute resolution
47:
1696:
1459:WP:LOCALCONSENSUS
1277:Time Warner Cable
1231:
1122:Christopher Nolan
1042:
1041:
989:
988:
985:
984:
981:
980:
880:
879:
876:
875:
748:
747:
744:
743:
740:
739:
736:
735:
707:Alternative media
572:WikiProject Media
564:Journalism portal
520:
519:
516:
515:
512:
511:
508:
507:
226:
225:
66:Assume good faith
43:
1795:
1701:
1694:
1690:
1665:
1660:
1656:
1378:
1372:
1273:Strongly oppose.
1251:
1235:
1225:
1198:
1149:
1000:
999:
993:
957:
956:
953:
950:
947:
926:
921:
920:
919:
910:
903:
902:
897:
889:
882:
852:
851:
848:
845:
842:
794:
789:
788:
787:
778:
771:
770:
765:
757:
750:
650:Article requests
639:
632:
631:
623:
597:
596:
593:
590:
587:
566:
561:
560:
559:
550:
543:
542:
537:
529:
522:
491:
480:
446:Portal:Companies
388:Article requests
377:
370:
369:
361:
335:
334:
333:company articles
331:
328:
325:
304:
302:Companies portal
299:
298:
297:
288:
281:
280:
275:
267:
260:
243:
237:
236:
228:
220:
206:
205:
196:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
1803:
1802:
1798:
1797:
1796:
1794:
1793:
1792:
1718:
1717:
1716:
1715:
1703:
1699:
1692:
1663:
1658:
1654:
1425:such examples.
1376:
1370:
1298:WP:OFFICIALNAME
1247:
1233:
1194:
1184:
1143:
1110:
1090:
1050:
997:
954:
951:
948:
945:
944:
922:
917:
915:
895:
849:
846:
843:
840:
839:
838:
824:Become a Member
790:
785:
783:
763:
732:
669:Media influence
611:High-importance
594:
591:
588:
585:
584:
562:
557:
555:
536:High‑importance
535:
504:
501:
485:
474:
349:High-importance
332:
329:
326:
323:
322:
300:
295:
293:
274:High‑importance
273:
244:on Knowledge's
241:
222:
221:
216:
193:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
1801:
1799:
1791:
1790:
1785:
1780:
1775:
1770:
1765:
1760:
1755:
1750:
1745:
1740:
1735:
1730:
1720:
1719:
1709:
1708:
1707:
1697:
1688:WP:NAMECHANGES
1680:
1679:
1626:
1625:
1624:
1623:
1622:
1590:
1589:
1588:
1587:
1586:
1585:
1584:
1583:
1582:
1581:
1580:
1555:Trailblazer101
1518:WP:NAMECHANGES
1504:Trailblazer101
1492:WP:NAMECHANGES
1454:
1453:
1452:
1442:Trailblazer101
1412:Trailblazer101
1408:WP:NAMECHANGES
1383:
1362:
1340:WP:NAMECHANGES
1333:
1323:103.111.100.82
1314:
1313:
1303:Trailblazer101
1291:
1241:
1221:WP:NAMECHANGES
1214:WP:NAMECHANGES
1206:
1205:
1191:requested move
1185:
1183:
1180:
1179:
1178:
1168:Trailblazer101
1109:
1106:
1089:
1086:
1085:
1084:
1049:
1046:
1044:
1040:
1039:
1038:
1037:
1023:
1001:
987:
986:
983:
982:
979:
978:
971:Mid-importance
967:
961:
960:
958:
941:the discussion
928:
927:
911:
899:
898:
896:Mid‑importance
890:
878:
877:
874:
873:
866:Mid-importance
862:
856:
855:
853:
837:
836:
831:
826:
821:
814:
812:Template Usage
808:
796:
795:
779:
767:
766:
764:Mid‑importance
758:
746:
745:
742:
741:
738:
737:
734:
733:
731:
730:
729:
728:
721:
713:
692:
679:
658:
643:
641:
640:
628:
627:
619:
618:
607:
601:
600:
598:
595:Media articles
581:the discussion
568:
567:
551:
539:
538:
530:
518:
517:
514:
513:
510:
509:
506:
505:
503:
502:
500:
499:
493:
492:project banner
482:
470:
462:
448:
435:
422:
409:
396:
381:
379:
378:
366:
365:
357:
356:
345:
339:
338:
336:
319:the discussion
306:
305:
289:
277:
276:
268:
256:
255:
249:
238:
224:
223:
214:
212:
211:
208:
207:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1800:
1789:
1786:
1784:
1781:
1779:
1776:
1774:
1771:
1769:
1766:
1764:
1761:
1759:
1756:
1754:
1751:
1749:
1746:
1744:
1741:
1739:
1736:
1734:
1731:
1729:
1726:
1725:
1723:
1713:
1706:
1702:
1695:
1689:
1685:
1684:Strong oppose
1682:
1681:
1678:
1674:
1670:
1666:
1651:
1650:WP:COMMONNAME
1647:
1643:
1638:
1634:
1630:
1627:
1621:
1617:
1613:
1609:
1608:
1607:
1603:
1599:
1595:
1591:
1579:
1575:
1571:
1566:
1565:
1564:
1560:
1556:
1551:
1547:
1543:
1538:
1537:
1536:
1532:
1528:
1523:
1519:
1515:
1514:
1513:
1509:
1505:
1501:
1499:
1493:
1488:
1487:
1486:
1482:
1478:
1474:
1469:
1464:
1460:
1455:
1451:
1447:
1443:
1438:
1437:
1436:
1432:
1428:
1423:
1422:
1421:
1417:
1413:
1409:
1405:
1402:Just because
1401:
1400:
1399:
1395:
1391:
1387:
1384:
1382:
1379:
1374:
1373:
1366:
1363:
1361:
1357:
1353:
1349:
1345:
1341:
1337:
1334:
1332:
1328:
1324:
1319:
1318:Strong oppose
1316:
1315:
1312:
1308:
1304:
1299:
1295:
1294:Strong Oppose
1292:
1290:
1286:
1282:
1278:
1274:
1271:
1270:
1269:
1268:
1264:
1260:
1255:
1254:WP:COMMONNAME
1250:
1245:
1240:
1239:
1236:
1229:
1222:
1217:
1215:
1211:
1204:
1202:
1197:
1192:
1187:
1186:
1181:
1177:
1173:
1169:
1165:
1161:
1157:
1153:
1147:
1142:
1141:
1140:
1139:
1135:
1131:
1127:
1123:
1119:
1114:
1107:
1105:
1104:
1100:
1096:
1087:
1083:
1079:
1075:
1074:InfiniteNexus
1071:
1067:
1066:
1065:
1064:
1060:
1056:
1047:
1045:
1035:
1031:
1027:
1024:
1021:
1017:
1013:
1010:
1009:
1008:
1007:
1006:Discussions:
1002:
995:
994:
991:
976:
972:
966:
963:
962:
959:
946:New York City
942:
938:
937:New York City
934:
933:
925:
914:
912:
909:
905:
904:
900:
894:
893:New York City
891:
888:
884:
871:
867:
861:
858:
857:
854:
841:United States
835:
832:
830:
827:
825:
822:
820:
819:
815:
813:
810:
809:
806:
802:
801:
793:
782:
780:
777:
773:
772:
768:
762:
761:United States
759:
756:
752:
727:
723:
722:
720:
718:
714:
712:
708:
704:
701:
699:
698:
693:
691:
688:
686:
685:
680:
678:
674:
670:
667:
665:
664:
659:
657:
654:
652:
651:
646:
645:
642:
638:
634:
633:
630:
629:
625:
624:
620:
616:
612:
606:
603:
602:
599:
582:
578:
574:
573:
565:
554:
552:
549:
545:
544:
540:
534:
531:
528:
524:
498:
494:
489:
483:
478:
472:
471:
469:
467:
463:
461:
457:
455:
454:
449:
447:
444:
442:
441:
436:
434:
431:
429:
428:
423:
421:
418:
416:
415:
410:
408:
405:
403:
402:
397:
395:
392:
390:
389:
384:
383:
380:
376:
372:
371:
368:
367:
363:
362:
358:
354:
350:
344:
341:
340:
337:
320:
316:
312:
311:
303:
292:
290:
287:
283:
282:
278:
272:
269:
266:
262:
257:
253:
247:
239:
235:
230:
229:
210:
209:
204:
200:
192:
189:
187:
183:
182:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
1711:
1683:
1629:Weak support
1628:
1550:WP:STATUSQUO
1521:
1497:
1467:
1462:
1385:
1369:
1364:
1343:
1335:
1317:
1293:
1272:
1242:
1218:
1209:
1207:
1195:
1188:
1118:Warner Bros.
1115:
1111:
1091:
1051:
1048:Company name
1043:
1025:
1011:
1005:
1004:
990:
970:
930:
865:
829:Project Talk
817:
798:
716:
715:
695:
694:
682:
681:
661:
660:
656:Mackay Radio
648:
647:
610:
570:
479:|Companies}}
465:
464:
451:
450:
438:
437:
425:
424:
412:
411:
399:
398:
386:
385:
348:
308:
252:WikiProjects
198:
184:
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
1667:(she/her •
1659:WarnerMedia
1640:operation.
1249:Time Warner
1244:WarnerMedia
1201:move review
1030:Time Warner
148:free images
31:not a forum
25:WarnerMedia
1722:Categories
1664:Sammi Brie
1546:WP:TOOSOON
1352:Epicgenius
1210:not moved.
1146:Coolcaesar
1130:Coolcaesar
1034:discussion
1020:discussion
1016:TimeWarner
703:Multimedia
677:Sound bite
1642:KICE (AM)
1598:O.maximov
1281:Adriazeri
1026:Not moved
1012:Not moved
324:Companies
315:companies
271:Companies
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
1612:162 etc.
1570:SnowFire
1527:SnowFire
1477:SnowFire
1427:162 etc.
1390:SnowFire
1259:162 etc.
1095:WiinterU
481:template
440:Maintain
414:Copyedit
199:100Â days
186:Archives
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
1633:WP:NCBC
1522:I agree
1466:metric
1386:Support
1234:ASUKITE
973:on the
868:on the
724:Answer
663:Cleanup
613:on the
495:Answer
427:Infobox
351:on the
242:B-class
154:WPÂ refs
142:scholar
1365:Oppose
1336:Oppose
1152:WP:RPP
1032:, see
1018:, see
834:Alerts
697:Verify
477:portal
401:Assess
248:scale.
126:Google
1468:heaps
1371:Waqar
1344:after
717:Other
586:Media
577:Media
533:Media
466:Other
453:Stubs
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
1693:nter
1686:Per
1646:KTTL
1616:talk
1602:talk
1574:talk
1559:talk
1531:talk
1508:talk
1481:talk
1446:talk
1431:talk
1416:talk
1394:talk
1356:talk
1338:per
1327:talk
1307:talk
1285:talk
1263:talk
1172:talk
1134:talk
1099:talk
1078:talk
1059:talk
684:NPOV
605:High
343:High
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
1596:?
1162:or
1124:to
965:Mid
860:Mid
176:TWL
1724::
1675:)
1671:•
1618:)
1604:)
1576:)
1561:)
1533:)
1510:)
1483:)
1463:if
1448:)
1433:)
1418:)
1396:)
1377:đź’¬
1358:)
1329:)
1309:)
1287:)
1265:)
1246:→
1193:.
1174:)
1136:)
1101:)
1080:)
1061:)
709:,
705:,
675:,
671:,
490:}}
486:{{
475:{{
197::
156:)
54:;
1700:U
1673:c
1669:t
1614:(
1600:(
1572:(
1557:(
1529:(
1506:(
1479:(
1444:(
1429:(
1414:(
1392:(
1354:(
1325:(
1305:(
1283:(
1261:(
1230:)
1226:(
1170:(
1148::
1144:@
1132:(
1097:(
1076:(
1057:(
1036:.
1022:.
977:.
872:.
719::
700::
687::
666::
653::
617:.
468::
456::
443::
430::
417::
404::
391::
355:.
254::
191:1
188::
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
