1088:. You seem to be under the impression that just because a fact is verifiable, it needs to be in a Wiki article. Hardly. Applying that logic to Knowledge (XXG) would result in excessively detailed articles on the over 10,000 small railroads that peppered the U.S. over the last 150 years. As long as the basic facts are present, written in a concise, simple manner and has a verifiable source, that works fine. Then, if you want to include additional sources that are not referenced in the text, you add "Further Sources," "External Links," etc. For the record, the excessive coordinate linkage of each and every station is hardly appropriate for a wiki article, but I left that (the sister article for
861:}} or similar link to a full article on the subtopic summarized in that section (for example, Yosemite National Park#History and History of the Yosemite area are two such related featured articles). The summary in a section at the parent article will often be at least twice as long as the lead section in the child article. The child article in turn can also serve as a parent article for its specific part of the topic, and so on, until a topic is very thoroughly covered. Thus, by navigational choices, several different types of readers each get the amount of details they want.
2559:
demolition of the W&OD's East Falls Church station. The legend of the top photo on page 22 states: "The
Virginia Electric Power Company had purchased the right of way for its power line and was concerned that the station could burn and severe its cables. It gave the station away to the Amissville Trading Post. Here, Trading Post workmen have removed the shingles and are removing the roof boards and rafters on August 18, 1970. (Photograph by Henry H. Douglas, courtesy of the Fairfax County Public Library Photographic Archive.)"
378:
351:
2403:
the map with only a few points. One of these points is in
Baltimore, far from the railroad's route. Do you have any plans to change or restore that that map, or do you wish to leave it as it presently is, thus confusing readers attempting to learn the locations of the railroad's routes and stations? I am not planning restore the map myself because I cannot do that without restoring the tables that listed the railroad's stations, all of which I believe that you removed.
481:
493:
388:
181:
81:
53:
247:
223:
1261:
by this criterion, any small railroad could have an article on WP. So what? If they can be properly sourced, then I don't see any reason why every small railroad in the country shouldn't have its own article. If they can't be properly sourced to independent reliable sources, then, of course, they shouldn't be included, because they're not notable. There are limits to this, and to some extent, they are outlined at
67:
257:
827:). A Wiki article should contain a quick summary of the topic's most important points. The level of detail contained in this article far exceeds the qualifications of a wikipedia article and is more appropriate for a fansite. A railroad line that did not exceed 80 miles does not need two articles covering its history. Please do not revert this move until first discussing on talk page. Thank you.
22:
735:
2443:. I suggest that you accomplish this by reverting your last edit to the article, by restoring the article to the condition that I considered to be satisfactory in my comment above that I date-stamped at 01:35, 9 October 2021, or by another method that you may find desirable (without removing any revisions still present in the article that other editors made after 01:35, 9 October 2021).
1211:
533:
2209:.) These maps and timetables can be kept as a subsection of the section or separate, I don't care, but they are to be treated as if they are a Further reading section and thus subject to a curation of limited and notable works. These sections should not be restored as is. They must be curated to brief lists, possibly only one link each.
95:
2558:
Pages 22-25 of the book "Guillaudeu, David A.; Foreword by McCray, Paul E. (2013). Washington & Old
Dominion Railroad. Charleston, South Carolina: Arcadia Publishing. ISBN 9780738597928. OCLC 811603181", which this article cites in its References section, describes and contains photographs of the
2261:
Each of the e-links to
Facebook that you removed contained an image of a published newspaper article. While Facebook is a social networking site, many Knowledge (XXG) articles contain in-line citations to newspaper articles. When an image of a newspaper article appears in a link to Facebook, the link
1978:
Recent edits have seriously damaged this article. For example, as I described in a previous comment, the tables in the article contained coordinates for each station that helped generate the maps of the W&OD's routes to which the article links (see box entitled "Map all coordinates in "Washington
1134:
describes the correct method for retaining verifiable information in
Knowledge (XXG) while assuring that the main article and each child article will be concise. Adding "Further Sources" and "External Links", as Oanabay04 has suggested, does not permit readers to differentiate useful information from
906:
does not contain any citations to reliable sources. This is important, as some of the information in the infobox is inaccurate (e.g., the logo in the infobox is not that of the
Washington and Old Dominion Railway and the Alexandria, VA, did not contain the headquarters of the company that controlled
2554:
contains a photograph of the W&OD's East Falls Church station. The legend beneath the photograph states: "From 1887 to 1970, the East Falls Church station stood on the site where you are located." Figure 3 on the page contains a 2012 photograph of the historical marker, which was near the south
2402:
Please direct your attentions to the contents of my message. I stated (correctly, I believe) that, for a second time, your edits broke the coordinates (you did not actually "break" the coordinates, but instead removed them) that had generated a map of the railroad's route. Your edits therefore left
2326:
All of my edits were grammatical (corrections of spelling errors, replacement of missing words, etc.). None affected content; if they had affected content, I would have updated the time-stamp. I made all of the edits before anyone responded. As somebody has responded, I will make no further changes
1992:
While some edits have been useful, others haved removed information that is of general interest. I therefore suggest that editors that have removed information review their changes and assure that they have not thrown the baby out with the bathwater, including the creation of links that now confuse
1955:
Removed all of the ones that can be construed as a further reading section, aka maps, timetables, and the
External Link sections. Facebook posts as ELs are unacceptable per our ELINK policy. This has now crossed into the spam event horizon. Every link should provide additional knowledge and serve as
1780:
Of course, I do not "own this article". That said, I want to avoid an edit war. Lists of maps and other sources are not "original research", as others made the maps and created those sources. Compiling the maps and other sources into a list is not synthesis, as each map and source is essentially an
1727:
make it ok to keep a page which is approaching 300 kb in size and riddled with policy violations as it is currently. Policies exist for good reason. If you truly want to document trivial and excessive information for railfans, that would be wonderful on your personal blog, but not here. Much of your
1649:
I concur that there may be too many links to photos of
Bluemont Junction and other stations. However, the appearances of these stations and nearby facilities changed over the years that the railroad operated. The photos document these changes. If you believe that there are too many links to photos,
1645:
You cited a
Knowledge (XXG) policy that states: "it is not Knowledge (XXG)'s purpose to include a lengthy or comprehensive list of external links related to each topic" and cited another that discusses a policy on excessive detail. While these policies are often beneficial, they are detrimental when
1928:
You later made the station list collapsible, which made it consistent with the other lists that you changed. I concur with your changes. I also concur with your deletions of some of the links to photos in the station lists. I was already preparing a draft containing similar deletions, but you made
1260:
have been met. They have not been met very well, and I would encourage the inclusion of more sources, for example, by using inline cites to the sources currently mentioned in "External links" and "Further reading". But this is not sufficient grounds to delete the article. Yes, one might argue that,
875:
Therefore, if an editor, such as
Oanabay04, considers that an article has too much detail, that editor has the responsibility to create a parent article and child articles that together retain all of the verifiable information that the original article contains. Further, if an editor considers that
855:
The parent article should have general summary information and the more detailed summaries of each subtopic should be in child articles and in articles on specific subjects. This can be thought of as layering inverted pyramids where the reader is first shown the lead section for a topic, and within
2104:
Iowa traction number 50 is a 50-ton steeplecab, built by Baldwin-Westinghouse in 1920 as Washington & Old Dominion Number 50. It was acquired by the Cedar Rapids & Iowa City in 1947, was rebuilt and renumbered number 58. In 1955 it was sold to the Kansas City-Kaw Valley Railroad and became
1703:
Please provide a summary or a specific list of changes to the article that you would like to make. I can delete many of those without reducing the utility of the article, including reducing the number of links to images. However others may be more problematic, as they are important references that
1656:
If you wish to add or remove individual items from the article, please discuss these changes first on this Talk page. This will enable other editors to contribute their comments if interested and will provide a basis for using Knowledge (XXG)'s dispute resolution procedures where consensus has not
1252:
that applies in this instance. That policy says "An organization is generally considered notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources" and "if no independent, third-party, reliable sources can be found on a topic, then Knowledge (XXG) should
2197:
My removal of the Maps, Timetables, and Further reading sections have not seriously damaged this article, nor did it break the coordinates. That is the second time you have associated the wrong editor with certain actions you view as breaking the article in this discussion. Please be careful, and
2280:
You stated that the recent edits that removed content are "bold changes". However, when an editor disagrees with the need for or the desirability of such removals, others need to use care when removing content. Some editors can construe "bold" removals of information to be vandalism. Attempts at
1894:
Having some links to photos is okay. The problem is when there's a large number of redundant ones showing the same place at the same time. The best solution is to simply link to a website which has a bunch of the photos, allowing only one link to convey the same information as the previous large
2265:
The best place for a link to newspaper article is within an in-line citation, as this will reduce the length of the External links section and will support a sentence or paragraph in the text. However the texts of articles sometimes do not contain suitable locations in which to place citations
2212:
Lastly, I don't see the edits taken over the past few days as damaging the article. It is a bold change that is now being discussed, and it seems that most people endorse it. Multiple outside editors have seen this article as needing major cleanup and that cleanup is being done according to our
1909:
The tables have now been changed to be collapsible, and to default to collapsed. This alone made a huge difference in how easy it is to navigate the article. I also deleted the table for the Great Falls and Old Dominion Railroad, since the list is available at the other article like I mentioned
1845:
This article may be too long and contain too many external links. The article may also contain information that is of little interest to many readers. Please therefore create subordinate "child" articles that contain some or all of this information if you consider that this would help Knowledge
2432:
Oh, I see it now. Either I or my computer produced a typographical error that changed a url. The error did not show up in the text. The text did not contain a link to the url. The error only showed up on the "Difference between revisions" section in the "Revision History" page for this "Talk"
1604:
external links, most to photos. In total there must be at least 150 external links in this article, if not more. To quote the policy: "it is not Knowledge (XXG)'s purpose to include a lengthy or comprehensive list of external links related to each topic." Some links can be helpful to document
1823:
We should be able to edit this article cooperatively, with the help of other editors that may be interested, as I believe that you do not want to "delete everything". If I perform the deletions without your input, you and others may consider that I have deleted too little or am "owning" the
1749:
Knowledge (XXG) is not a publishing house, and we do not keep things solely because "they are important references that cannot be found in publications." You are more than welcome to make your own website to document that information, but on Knowledge (XXG) we do not allow original research.
1229:
is even relevant to the discussion at hand. It makes no statement as to what level of detail is "too much" for WP, but only states how any information that is included should be divided up. If, for the sake of argument, we were to accept that the information in this version of the article is
1092:
suffers from the same issue). Retaining two separate articles for a railroad the size of the W&OD overkill and more appropriate of a fanpage, as previously mentioned. I suggest you look through some other Wiki format links because it is really important to know unless you want your work
645:
The Washington and Old Dominion Railway concluded negotations with the Southern Railway for the lease of the Southern's Bluemont Branch in 1911. Under the lease terms, the Washington & Old Dominion Railway would take over all of the Bluemont Branch service on July 1, 1912. Reference:
596:
Public-domain maps of the Washington and Old Dominion Railroad and its predecessors are available in the Ames Williams Collection in a branch of the Alexandria public library system at the following location: Local History/Special Collections, 717 Queen Street, Alexandria, VA 22314-2420.
2527:
I quoted the entire source, not just part of it. As I stated, a sentence near the top of Section 8, page 15, of the cited reference states in its entirety: "The station was dismantled in 1970 (Wrenn 1972:79)." The sentence says nothing about I-66, nor does any other sentence on page
1910:
before. Corker1, if you don't mind, could you add a few paragraphs to summarize the Great Falls Division and how it relates to the W&ODR, so it isn't an empty section anymore? You clearly know far more than I do about the subject, so I'd much rather you write the summary.
1631:): Please do not delete major parts of articles without first discussing specific potential edits on article's Talk pages. Your unilateral deletion was a violation of WP policy, which emphasises collaborative efforts by editors. Such unilateral actions can lead to edit wars.
2538:
historical marker identifies the station's former site. The marker is under the W&OD Trail bridge over Langston Boulevard. I-66 (the Custis Memorial Parkway) is north of the trail bridge and Fairfax Drive. You can see this for yourself on the 2023 satellite image at
1634:
You deleted a large amount of information supported by references to reliable sources. When doing this, you repeated an action that was reverted more than five years ago by consensus. As that action involved a redirect, it does not show up in the revision history of this
2540:
2398:
If you actualy believe that "before your edits become ancient history" is a threat, you have a very different belief than I have. There are no consequences to having an edit become ancient history, other than the obvious fact that the edit may last for a very long
1979:
and Old Dominion Railroad" using OpenStreetMap: Download coordinates as: KML.") All of that information is now gone, leaving a map of the W&OD Railroad's route with only a few data points, one of which is located in Baltimore, far from the railroad's route.
2380:
What are you trying to communicate? First, you stated that I had edited my message 10 times after I first wrote it. You then stated that my last edit modified your comment to break the link that you included. However, the first version of my message stated
901:
identifies the editor of the book, but does not identify the author of the referenced information or the primary source of the information. Readers therefore find it difficult or impossible to verify the relliability of the source. Further, the infobox in
1675:. I was posting here to give you a chance to remedy the issue rather than me unilaterally deleting everything. With that said, consensus can change over time. Just because there was a consensus 5 years ago does not mean that consensus can never change.
2238:
The coordinates were within the tables listing the locations of stations. If the tables are gone, the map generated from the tables will be gone. Something important that is of general interest will be lost unless someone other than myself restores
2155:
is now a dead link. My computer could not download the archived link that the citation also contained. As an in-line citation to a secondary source also supports the sentence that preceded the citation, I have removed the citation from the article's
907:
the Railway.) The merges and other edits that Oanabay04 performed removed a large amount of verifiable information from Knowledge (XXG) and replaced it with inadequately sourced information. This is vandalism, regardless of an editor's intent.
1638:
Many readers (including rail fans) use the station lists and external links in this article in discussions and when preparing publications. There are no other easily accessible sources for this information, except by using citations that you
1307:, then it should start in 1936, but it's essentially a history of the entire company beginning with the Alexandria and Harpers Ferry. I'm not opposed to that, at least until such time as sub-articles can be written. Note that the existing
1988:
removed several sections, stating: "This section should also be treated as a further reading. Removing as spam for now." However, nobody has added the information in these sections to the "Further reading" section. Somebody should to do
1924:
I needed to restore the table containing the station list for the Great Falls Division because the table contained the coordinates for each station. Those coordinates helped generate the maps of the W&OD's routes to which the article
1718:
To be blunt, you do not own this article, or any article on Knowledge (XXG). I do not need to get your permission to make changes to it. Policies are not suggestions for you to pick and choose, they represent community consensus and are
1608:
The same goes for the massive station lists - they violate Knowledge (XXG) policy on excessive detail. I appreciate that editors have been working to make a comprehensive article, but Knowledge (XXG)'s policies exist for good reasons.
2541:
https://www.google.com/maps/place/East+Falls+Church+Station+Historical+Marker/@38.8874385,-77.1652887,671m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m6!3m5!1s0x89b7b5e2b9dc3681:0x938599b99c7ece63!8m2!3d38.8874344!4d-77.1627138!16s%2Fg%2F11h01pck0h?entry=ttu
928:. However, there is no reason to believe that the contributor had sufficient expertise to use that name in the contribution. As noted above, a public entity (the Northern Virginia Regional Parks Authority) has assigned the name
1012:
I am glad you want to enourage myself and other editors to create parent and child articles that retain all verifiable information in these articles. The problem is that you failed to include the main purpose of the
1135:
all of the extraneous, irrelevant and/or redundant information present in each link and source. Further, this procedure would often result in long and confusing lists of "External Links" and "Further Sources".
2295:" "Now" is now history. It can become ancient history. Please therefore reduce, replace, restore or revise the "spam" that you removed in the manner that you see fit before your edits become ancient history.
2121:. However, the first "50" in the text appears to have been a typographical error. I have edited the text to correct the error by changing the first "50" to "53". The sentence in the text is therefore now not
2461:, I think the community can safely ignore such a demand as it's the community that determines what is satisfactory. I'll agree with the others that the article looks much better now than it did before edits
1605:
information that can't be included here, but what has happened in this article goes entirely beyond any reasonable interpretation of the external links policy. The vast majority will need to be deleted.
1802:
I asked for your suggestions for deletions to avoid an edit war or the appearance of one. However, if you would like to make the deletions yourself without proposing them first in Talk, please do so.
1256:
The article includes inline cites to a single independent secondary source (the other does not appear to be independent of the subject). But one is not zero, so it seems to me that the standards of
719:
2636:
558:
for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution.
2563:
2288:" As you removed those sections, you appear to be the editor responsible for creating the initial "brief lists" that you suggested. Other editors can later curate the lists if they so desire.
972:
to their versions that existed before the most recent edits by Onabay04. I encourage Oanabay04 and other editors to create parent and child articles that retain all verifiable information in
2606:
418:
551:
876:
an article contains too many Wikilinks, that editor has the responsiblity to remove those that are excessive on an individual basis, rather than deleting or replacing entire sections.
66:
2646:
1891:
One other easy change would be to default the tables to collapsed, which would make the article way easier to navigate. It would only take one click to open up any of the tables.
511:
435:
1642:
You did not delete only external links and lists. You deleted entire sections of text, maps and photographs. Those deletions essentially destroyed the utility of this article.
2555:
side of the W&OD Trail (before the trail bridge was constructed). The legend beneath the photograph states: "The old train station stood just to the right of the marker."
2505:
Quoting part of the source doesn't help. It says (use a map) that the location of the line and station in that area is now under I-66. An editor summarized it accurately.
1089:
2651:
2641:
2395:
Therefore, neither my initial message nor my edits to my message modified your comment. I am thoroughly confused. I can't see how or where I modified any of your comments.
1240:. This is the policy used "to decide whether a topic can have its own article" and "to avoid indiscriminate inclusion of topics", and it is the one that applies here. As
2235:
did that, for the second time. I cannot restore the coordinates again without being accused of "edit-warring" (an accusation that has been made against me in the past).
1538:
1534:
1520:
471:
672:
1888:
where this article and GF&ODR article have identical lists. The latter article is already linked from here, so anyone can go there to view the full station list.
2591:
1168:
recommends. In contrast, removing much verifiable and relevant information from Knowledge (XXG) by redirecting entire articles, as Oanabay04 has repeatedly done to
161:
1929:
your deletions before I had added mine. I have also added a summary for the Great Falls Division section in accordance with your suggestion. Thanks for the edits.
203:
2631:
1023:
Summary style is based on the premise that information about a topic should not all be contained in a single article since different readers have different needs:
461:
425:
2596:
506:
361:
2163:, please provide an explanation. Please also provide additional examples of references that support statements in the article's text that you consider to be
2586:
2152:
2063:
333:
2656:
2626:
1164:
I agree with Oanabay04 that Knowledge (XXG) should contain only one article describing this railroad. This article should have several child articles, as
984:. To avoid any loss of verifiable information, both articles should remain open to all readers until editors have created the parent and child articles.
430:
2562:
Based on the above, please remove the text in the article that states that the station was torn down in 1970 "to make room for I-66". It is not correct.
2277:" When those maps later became available on-line, I added links to them. These links were clearly important and of general interest. They are now gone.
572:
171:
2616:
323:
2070:
since it is not actually stated. Someone credible must anaylse these pictures and then we must cite their analyses to include it in Knowledge (XXG).
1232:
The real dispute, it seems to me, is whether or not the information is important enough to be included in WP at all, and the policy for that is not
555:
597:
Public-domain maps of the railroad are also available at the headquarters of the Washington and Old Railroad Regional Park in Ashburn, Virginia.
2621:
1880:
The stations list for the Great Falls Division should be largely or completely deleted from here, as it is already included in full detail on
401:
356:
285:
2601:
1881:
2543:. The satellite image identifies the location of the "East Falls Church Historical Marker", which is adjacent to the station's former site.
2440:
2267:
1346:
1300:
1169:
973:
965:
890:
704:
632:
539:
2309:
Corker1, you have edited your message more than 10 times since posting it. Need I remind you that this is widely considered bad practice?
2129:
2059:
133:
129:
2148:
because the 2014 photo directly supports the text's statement that the locomotive retained its number (#44) when the BRJY opened in 1985.
1230:
appropriate for WP, then it makes perfect sense that it should be included here, in a separate article, and not clutter up the main one.
2531:
Further, the former station's site is now not under I-66. The site is not even close to I-66. It is about 200 feet south of the highway.
1308:
1304:
977:
969:
933:
903:
894:
820:
543:
1276:
may be the best place to obtain wider opinion, since the question ultimately comes down to whether or not this page should be deleted.
2611:
413:
309:
2567:
1696:) I apologize for confusing the identity of the editor that unilaterally deleted almost everything. You followed proper procedures.
2135:
1516:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
656:
2439:
Please use your editing abilities to restore the map generated from the coordinates in the tables that your last edit removed from
270:
228:
2203:
a bulleted list of a reasonable number of works that a reader may consult for additional and more detailed coverage of the subject
2273:
You removed links to maps and timetables. As you can read near the top of this Talk page, a contributer to Talk asked in 2006:
2099:
2055:
801:
409:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
2330:
My last statement involved a note on on the article's "Revision History" page. I used the word "Please". Where is the threat?
197:
1322:
1368:
125:
116:
58:
33:
2423:
2371:
2357:
2317:
1915:
1900:
1755:
1693:
1680:
1653:
Wholesale deletions such as the one that you have made have no place in Knowledge (XXG). I have therefore reverted your edit.
1628:
1614:
584:
2066:
or any number of the actual photographs I see cited in this article. To form a conclusion off of an image like this is pure
2115:
It was sold in 1962 to the Iowa Terminal Railroad and renumbered to 50, becoming #50 of the Iowa Traction Railroad in 1987
1464:
1030:
others need a moderate amount of information on the topic's more important points (a set of multiparagraph sections), and
193:
1581:
2206:
2139:
1846:(XXG). I should not do this myself, as some may then consider that I am "owning" the parent article and its children.
1723:
I'm not interested in trying to get this article deleted or turned into a redirect, the subject is notable. That does
797:
1262:
1895:
number. I will cut down some duplicate photos the best I can without compromising the history from them completely.
2547:
1200:
2419:
2390:
2383:
2367:
2366:
Do you seriously not see how "before your edits become ancient history" could easily be interpreted as a threat?
2353:
2313:
2232:
1911:
1896:
1751:
1689:
1676:
1624:
1610:
1065:
1537:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1266:
635:, the W&OD leased the line from November 15, 1911. Is this correct, or was it actually effective in 1912? --
2254:
states that one should generally avoid providing external links to Facebook and other social networking sites.
1033:
some readers need a lot of details on one or more aspects of the topic (links to full-sized separate articles).
2286:
These sections should not be restored as is. They must be curated to brief lists, possibly only one link each.
2144:" The reference that you identified is a 2014 photo of BRJ 44, accompanied by the photo's source. This is not
1506:
708:
39:
21:
1572:
1354:
498:
1350:
787:
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant
777:
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
2132:
is within an in-line citation to a reference that follows the following sentence in the article's text: "
849:
encourages editors to create "parent" and "child" articles if a single article contains too much detail.
2220:
2077:
1967:
1556:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1544:
1470:
1061:
284:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1353:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
2102:
is part of an in-line citation that contains a photo and the following direct quote from its source: "
788:
763:
before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
742:
1084:, etc. Creating two entire articles on the small W&OD brings up a serious question of notability
393:
2571:
2514:
2474:
2452:
2427:
2412:
2375:
2361:
2339:
2321:
2304:
2226:
2176:
2083:
2050:
2033:
2019:
2002:
1973:
1938:
1919:
1904:
1855:
1759:
1713:
1684:
1666:
1618:
1586:
1332:
1285:
1181:
1172:, is inappropriate, is against Wikpedia policy, is an extreme form of vandalism, and needs to stop.
1102:
993:
932:
to one of its facilities. Further, the authors of three books (including a 2013 book referenced in
836:
805:
712:
685:
639:
621:
606:
588:
2348:
comment to break the link I included. At this point, I'm not sure if you are trolling or just fail
2048:
2017:
1329:
1316:
1098:
832:
823:
page, as that article is more concise and covers all important historical aspects of the line (see
1269:, but the page, as it currently stands, does not seem to me to violate either of these standards.
1233:
1226:
1165:
1131:
1014:
981:
944:. Together, these authors and entities carry greater weight than does the unknown contributor to
850:
846:
824:
2510:
2038:
Several of the footnotes are bundled collections of Internet forums, YouTube videos and images. ―
1422:
1081:
703:
The following coordinate fixes are need for LATITUDE NEED TO BE NEGATIVE...YOU END UP IN CHINA!!—
666:
580:
2198:
review what changes each editor makes before you accuse everyone here of "damaging the article".
2111:". The in-line citation was apparently intended to support the following sentence in the text:
2007:
This article still contains a massive collection of unreliable sources. It needs to be purged. ―
1885:
1541:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
377:
350:
1557:
1416:
1380:
2448:
2408:
2335:
2300:
2172:
2029:
1998:
1934:
1851:
1709:
1662:
1374:
1281:
1177:
989:
681:
653:
602:
1729:
1410:
768:
315:
2214:
2107:
Finally, in 1962 it was sold to the Iowa Terminal and renumbered 53, later becoming IATR 50.
2071:
1983:
1961:
1069:
893:
is supported by in-line citations to reliable sources. However, some of the information in
652:(3rd ed.). Fairfax Station, Virginia: Northern Virginia Regional Park Authority. pp. 45–46.
2349:
2262:
is not "unacceptable" and is not one to be avoided when it is in an External links section.
1732:. If you are unwilling to accept that, I'd be happy to bring it to the attention of admins.
1564:
1369:
http://theunionstation.org/museums/utah-state-railroad-museum/spencer-s-eccles-rail-center/
1273:
1257:
1245:
1085:
1027:
many readers need just a quick summary of the topic's most important points (lead section),
781:
772:
760:
1458:
262:
2255:
2251:
2247:
2164:
2160:
2145:
2122:
2067:
1597:
1446:
1386:
1216:
480:
2089:
2039:
2008:
1697:
1672:
1523:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
1452:
1326:
1312:
1241:
1094:
828:
121:
2310:
2024:
Please provide some examples of "unreliable sources" that the article still contains.
1646:
no publications or websites put together most or all of the information in an article.
1563:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1530:
1488:
1465:
http://bluemontva.org/media/pics/history/max/301%20-%20BluemontRRStation%20-%20920.jpg
1404:
1398:
1249:
1237:
80:
52:
2580:
2522:
2506:
2470:
636:
618:
576:
406:
137:
104:
2444:
2404:
2331:
2296:
2168:
2025:
1994:
1930:
1847:
1705:
1658:
1277:
1173:
1060:
The only railroads that probably warrant full-sized separate articles would be the
985:
677:
598:
1500:
1482:
180:
897:
lacks adequate in-line citations. For example, the reference to information in
569:
Is there a public-domain map of the line available? I can't recall seeing one.
2125:
because the citation contains a statement that directly supports that sentence.
1210:
936:
before Oanabay04 deleted the reference without explanation) bear the titles of
246:
222:
2535:
2275:
Is there a public-domain map of the line available? I can't recall seeing one.
1529:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
1494:
1362:
734:
488:
383:
275:
252:
2312:
And your last statement can be construed as a threat against another editor.
1440:
1434:
1428:
794:
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image
650:
Rails to the Blue Ridge: The Washington and Old Dominion Railroad, 1847–1968
1507:
https://web.archive.org/web/20070317083900/http://gfhs.org/pics/dickeys.htm
1476:
405:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
532:
2466:
280:
124:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, you can visit the
2258:
does not state that Facebook is "almost always an unacceptable e-link."
1704:
cannot be found in publications (such as the list of historical maps).
759:; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review
1671:
I am not the one who deleted most of the article. You want to talk to
2551:
1471:
http://bluemontva.org/media/pics/history/max/311%20-%202-5-39-480.jpg
1960:
reader, whether they have a flying rat's knowledge of rails or not.
1510:
1392:
745:, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason:
94:
1325:) copied much of the text word-for-word from George Drury's book.
1073:
1077:
857:
648:
Harwood, Herbert Hawley, Jr. (April 2000). "4. Transformation".
2138:
as #44, the locomotive retained its number when it became the
1423:
http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.php?id=468307&nseq=5
1072:, and public transit agencies with several moving parts, like
527:
318:
in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
314:
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the
15:
1417:
http://www.rrpicturearchives.net/showPicture.aspx?id=3510948
1381:
http://www.rrpicturearchives.net/showPicture.aspx?id=4825184
980:
in a series of layered inverted pyramids in accordance with
479:
179:
120:, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to
1375:
http://www.rrpicturearchives.net/Locopicture.aspx?id=134007
2109:
The unit is seen here switching out Mason City's AGP plant
1411:
http://www.rrpicturearchives.net/locoPicture.aspx?id=30579
1357:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
780:
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try
128:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
1993:
readers because they no longer link to anything useful.
1272:
I would suggest that, if you still disagree about this,
274:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
2462:
2417:
1459:
http://www.roundhillva.org/images2/photos/trainwest.jpg
948:. The title of the parent article should therefore be
747:
All Knowledge (XXG) files with unknown copyright status
547:
2291:
You wrote on this article's "Revision History" page: "
2266:
containing links to newspaper articles, as is true in
1447:
http://www.aefcca.org/files/documents/efc-history2.pdf
1387:
http://www.geocities.ws/pem20165/wodph303Number50.html
1299:
What's this article actually about? If it's about the
1225:
Having had a look through this, I do not believe that
718:
Coordinate has been corrected and made negative. See
2459:
to the condition that I considered to be satisfactory
2436:
You have sharp eyes. Thanks for correcting the error.
1311:
article is up for deletion as a copyright violation;
2637:
Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
2201:
Further reading sections, additionally, function as
1453:
http://www.roundhillva.org/images2/photos/traino.jpg
1090:
Washington & Old Dominion Railroad Regional Park
1533:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
1489:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/runneralan/460531874/
1405:
http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.php?id=405146
1399:
http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.php?id=321596
930:Washington and Old Dominion Railroad Regional Park
2607:B-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
1650:please identify the ones that you wish to delete.
2244:Facebook is almost always an unacceptable elink.
2231:I did not state that you broke the coordinates.
946:The Historical Guide to North American Railroads
922:The Historical Guide to North American Railroads
899:The Historical Guide to North American Railroads
2159:If you still consider first two "firsts" to be
2142:'s (BJRY's) first when the BJRY opened in 1985.
1501:http://www.roundhillva.org/default.asp?page=150
1483:http://www.roundhillva.org/default.asp?page=150
2281:"cleanup" can be excessive. So far, these are.
1519:This message was posted before February 2018.
819:This page has previously been merged into the
726:File:En-wodr.ogg Nominated for speedy Deletion
2550:page entitled "East Falls Church Station" at
8:
2647:Low-importance District of Columbia articles
671:: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
1495:http://www.leesburgcigars.com/pictures.html
1363:http://www.hmdb.org/Marker.asp?Marker=64845
1203:for resolution. 03:52, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
19:
2242:When removing external links, you stated:
1345:I have just modified 25 external links on
345:
217:
47:
2652:WikiProject District of Columbia articles
2642:Start-Class District of Columbia articles
1441:http://www.railpictures.net/photo/634927/
1435:http://www.railpictures.net/photo/621548/
1429:http://www.railpictures.net/photo/590084/
1199:Dispute between two editors submitted to
446:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject United States
1477:http://www.herndonhistoricalsociety.org/
208:to create and add a map to this article.
347:
219:
49:
2592:Low-importance rail transport articles
2458:
2388:The last version of my message stated
2202:
1338:External links modified (January 2018)
942:Washington & Old Dominion Railroad
664:
2632:Low-importance United States articles
2564:2601:140:9480:81B0:91CF:3966:9A0F:FBD
1882:Great Falls and Old Dominion Railroad
1596:This page is a flagrant violation of
950:Washington and Old Dominion Railroad.
856:its article any section may have a {{
633:ICC valuation of the Southern Railway
7:
2597:Rail transport articles needing maps
2441:Washington and Old Dominion Railroad
2268:Washington and Old Dominion Railroad
1347:Washington and Old Dominion Railroad
1303:(as the lede says), the reorganized
1301:Washington and Old Dominion Railroad
1170:Washington and Old Dominion Railroad
974:Washington and Old Dominion Railroad
966:Washington and Old Dominion Railroad
938:Washington and Old Dominion Railroad
891:Washington and Old Dominion Railroad
540:Washington and Old Dominion Railroad
399:This article is within the scope of
294:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Virginia
268:This article is within the scope of
114:This article is within the scope of
2587:Start-Class rail transport articles
1600:. Just Bluemont Junction alone has
1309:Washington and Old Dominion Railway
1305:Washington and Old Dominion Railway
978:Washington and Old Dominion Railway
970:Washington and Old Dominion Railway
934:Washington and Old Dominion Railway
926:Washington and Old Dominion Railway
904:Washington and Old Dominion Railway
895:Washington and Old Dominion Railway
821:Washington and Old Dominion Railway
815:Merge Railroad and Railway articles
617:Dang that is one hyperactive bot.
544:Washington and Old Dominion Railway
38:It is of interest to the following
2657:WikiProject United States articles
2627:Start-Class United States articles
2552:https://www.hmdb.org/m.asp?m=55964
449:Template:WikiProject United States
316:project-independent quality rating
146:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Trains
14:
2136:Great Western Railway of Colorado
1349:. Please take a moment to review
2617:Mid-importance Virginia articles
1511:http://gfhs.org/pics/dickeys.htm
1393:http://www.geocities.ws/pem20165
1248:is the more specific version of
1209:
733:
531:
507:WikiProject District of Columbia
491:
386:
376:
349:
255:
245:
221:
93:
79:
65:
51:
20:
2270:for the links that you removed.
1499:Corrected formatting/usage for
1493:Corrected formatting/usage for
1487:Corrected formatting/usage for
1481:Corrected formatting/usage for
1475:Corrected formatting/usage for
1469:Corrected formatting/usage for
1463:Corrected formatting/usage for
1457:Corrected formatting/usage for
1451:Corrected formatting/usage for
1445:Corrected formatting/usage for
1439:Corrected formatting/usage for
1433:Corrected formatting/usage for
1427:Corrected formatting/usage for
1421:Corrected formatting/usage for
1415:Corrected formatting/usage for
1409:Corrected formatting/usage for
1403:Corrected formatting/usage for
1397:Corrected formatting/usage for
1391:Corrected formatting/usage for
1385:Corrected formatting/usage for
1379:Corrected formatting/usage for
1373:Corrected formatting/usage for
1367:Corrected formatting/usage for
1361:Corrected formatting/usage for
771:then you may need to provide a
741:An image used in this article,
466:This article has been rated as
328:This article has been rated as
166:This article has been rated as
2393:did that, for the second time.
2386:did that, for the second time.
1:
2622:WikiProject Virginia articles
1201:Knowledge (XXG):Third opinion
789:image page (File:En-wodr.ogg)
504:This article is supported by
297:Template:WikiProject Virginia
288:and see a list of open tasks.
134:WikiProject Trains to do list
2602:All WikiProject Trains pages
2475:23:10, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
2453:19:42, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
2428:15:24, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
2413:07:33, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
2376:02:16, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
2362:02:01, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
2340:01:24, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
2322:21:58, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
2305:16:18, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
2227:21:08, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
2177:23:11, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
2084:21:12, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
2051:21:12, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
2034:18:25, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
2020:18:15, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
2003:18:02, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
1974:11:20, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
1587:12:38, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
1253:not have an article on it."
713:06:57, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
640:11:26, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
622:01:45, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
589:01:42, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
565:Desperately in need of a map
2572:16:46, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
2515:01:38, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
2140:Burlington Junction Railway
1939:01:35, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
1920:23:49, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
1905:23:40, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
1856:23:04, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
1760:21:56, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
1714:21:52, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
1685:21:22, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
1667:21:16, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
1619:19:06, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
1333:11:23, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
920:One of the contributors to
686:21:42, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
149:Template:WikiProject Trains
2673:
2548:Historical Marker Database
2250:to support this. However,
1550:(last update: 5 June 2024)
1342:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
1286:16:39, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
1182:20:14, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
994:03:49, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
889:All of the information in
837:19:05, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
806:21:14, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
607:21:41, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
472:project's importance scale
334:project's importance scale
188:It is requested that an a
172:project's importance scale
2612:B-Class Virginia articles
2293:Removing as spam for now.
2213:policies and guidelines.
1103:18:31, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
1066:New York Central Railroad
964:I am therefore restoring
487:
465:
402:WikiProject United States
371:
327:
313:
240:
187:
165:
74:
46:
2344:Your last edit modified
407:United States of America
924:may have used the name
548:11:43, 25 February 2013
499:Washington, D.C. portal
200:. Please work with the
152:rail transport articles
860:|<subpage name: -->
798:CommonsNotificationBot
484:
452:United States articles
184:
28:This article is rated
2501:...to make room, etc.
2134:After serving on the
1884:. This has created a
1217:third opinion request
1062:Pennsylvania Railroad
575:comment was added by
483:
183:
32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
2420:Trainsandotherthings
2391:Trainsandotherthings
2384:Trainsandotherthings
2368:Trainsandotherthings
2354:Trainsandotherthings
2314:Trainsandotherthings
2233:Trainsandotherthings
1982:As another example,
1912:Trainsandotherthings
1897:Trainsandotherthings
1752:Trainsandotherthings
1690:Trainsandotherthings
1677:Trainsandotherthings
1625:Trainsandotherthings
1611:Trainsandotherthings
1531:regular verification
720:Mapping on Bing Maps
550:. The former page's
394:United States portal
362:District of Columbia
271:WikiProject Virginia
1521:After February 2018
1093:mercilessly edited.
761:deletion guidelines
556:provide attribution
420:Articles Requested!
198:improve its quality
196:in this article to
2207:WP:Further reading
2105:their number 507.
1575:InternetArchiveBot
1526:InternetArchiveBot
1082:New Jersey Transit
773:fair use rationale
485:
185:
117:WikiProject Trains
34:content assessment
1956:an interest to a
1728:response is just
1551:
1292:
1291:
1263:WP:INDISCRIMINATE
812:
811:
752:What should I do?
698:{{geodata-check}}
631:According to the
592:
562:
561:
526:
525:
522:
521:
518:
517:
344:
343:
340:
339:
300:Virginia articles
216:
215:
212:
211:
112:
111:
2664:
2546:Figure 2 on the
2526:
2223:
2217:
2096:
2080:
2074:
2046:
2015:
1986:
1970:
1964:
1585:
1576:
1549:
1548:
1527:
1244:correctly says,
1213:
1206:
1205:
1070:Canadian Pacific
767:If the image is
743:File:En-wodr.ogg
737:
730:
729:
700:
699:
692:Coordinate error
676:
670:
662:
570:
535:
528:
501:
496:
495:
494:
454:
453:
450:
447:
444:
396:
391:
390:
389:
380:
373:
372:
367:
364:
353:
346:
302:
301:
298:
295:
292:
265:
260:
259:
258:
249:
242:
241:
236:
233:
225:
218:
154:
153:
150:
147:
144:
97:
88:
87:
83:
76:
75:
70:
69:
68:
63:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
2672:
2671:
2667:
2666:
2665:
2663:
2662:
2661:
2577:
2576:
2520:
2503:
2457:In response to
2221:
2215:
2090:
2078:
2072:
2040:
2009:
1984:
1968:
1962:
1657:been achieved.
1594:
1579:
1574:
1542:
1535:have permission
1525:
1355:this simple FaQ
1340:
1297:
1267:WP:DISCRIMINATE
817:
782:Deletion Review
728:
697:
696:
694:
663:
659:
647:
629:
615:
571:—The preceding
567:
497:
492:
490:
451:
448:
445:
442:
441:
440:
426:Become a Member
392:
387:
385:
365:
359:
299:
296:
293:
290:
289:
263:Virginia portal
261:
256:
254:
234:
231:
204:Maps task force
151:
148:
145:
142:
141:
113:
99:
98:
64:
61:
29:
12:
11:
5:
2670:
2668:
2660:
2659:
2654:
2649:
2644:
2639:
2634:
2629:
2624:
2619:
2614:
2609:
2604:
2599:
2594:
2589:
2579:
2578:
2575:
2574:
2560:
2556:
2544:
2532:
2529:
2502:
2499:
2498:
2497:
2496:
2495:
2494:
2493:
2492:
2491:
2490:
2489:
2488:
2487:
2486:
2485:
2484:
2483:
2482:
2481:
2480:
2479:
2478:
2477:
2437:
2434:
2400:
2396:
2364:
2328:
2289:
2282:
2278:
2271:
2263:
2259:
2240:
2236:
2210:
2199:
2190:
2189:
2188:
2187:
2186:
2185:
2184:
2183:
2182:
2181:
2180:
2179:
2157:
2149:
2126:
2053:
1990:
1980:
1953:
1952:
1951:
1950:
1949:
1948:
1947:
1946:
1945:
1944:
1943:
1942:
1941:
1926:
1907:
1892:
1889:
1867:
1866:
1865:
1864:
1863:
1862:
1861:
1860:
1859:
1858:
1834:
1833:
1832:
1831:
1830:
1829:
1828:
1827:
1826:
1825:
1812:
1811:
1810:
1809:
1808:
1807:
1806:
1805:
1804:
1803:
1791:
1790:
1789:
1788:
1787:
1786:
1785:
1784:
1783:
1782:
1781:external link.
1769:
1768:
1767:
1766:
1765:
1764:
1763:
1762:
1740:
1739:
1738:
1737:
1736:
1735:
1734:
1733:
1701:
1698:User:Susmuffin
1673:User:Susmuffin
1654:
1651:
1647:
1643:
1640:
1636:
1632:
1593:
1592:External links
1590:
1569:
1568:
1561:
1514:
1513:
1505:Added archive
1503:
1497:
1491:
1485:
1479:
1473:
1467:
1461:
1455:
1449:
1443:
1437:
1431:
1425:
1419:
1413:
1407:
1401:
1395:
1389:
1383:
1377:
1371:
1365:
1339:
1336:
1296:
1293:
1290:
1289:
1222:
1221:
1197:
1196:
1195:
1194:
1193:
1192:
1191:
1190:
1189:
1188:
1187:
1186:
1185:
1184:
1149:
1148:
1147:
1146:
1145:
1144:
1143:
1142:
1141:
1140:
1139:
1138:
1137:
1136:
1116:
1115:
1114:
1113:
1112:
1111:
1110:
1109:
1108:
1107:
1106:
1105:
1047:
1046:
1045:
1044:
1043:
1042:
1041:
1040:
1039:
1038:
1037:
1036:
1031:
1028:
1019:
1018:
1001:
1000:
999:
998:
997:
996:
957:
956:
955:
954:
953:
952:
913:
912:
911:
910:
909:
908:
882:
881:
880:
879:
878:
877:
868:
867:
866:
865:
864:
863:
816:
813:
810:
809:
785:
784:
778:
775:
754:
753:
738:
727:
724:
723:
722:
705:72.192.201.191
693:
690:
689:
688:
657:
628:
625:
614:
611:
610:
609:
566:
563:
560:
559:
554:now serves to
538:Material from
536:
524:
523:
520:
519:
516:
515:
512:Low-importance
503:
502:
486:
476:
475:
468:Low-importance
464:
458:
457:
455:
439:
438:
433:
428:
423:
416:
414:Template Usage
410:
398:
397:
381:
369:
368:
366:Low‑importance
354:
342:
341:
338:
337:
330:Mid-importance
326:
320:
319:
312:
306:
305:
303:
286:the discussion
267:
266:
250:
238:
237:
235:Mid‑importance
226:
214:
213:
210:
209:
186:
176:
175:
168:Low-importance
164:
158:
157:
155:
122:rail transport
110:
109:
100:
92:
91:
86:
84:
72:
71:
62:Low‑importance
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2669:
2658:
2655:
2653:
2650:
2648:
2645:
2643:
2640:
2638:
2635:
2633:
2630:
2628:
2625:
2623:
2620:
2618:
2615:
2613:
2610:
2608:
2605:
2603:
2600:
2598:
2595:
2593:
2590:
2588:
2585:
2584:
2582:
2573:
2569:
2565:
2561:
2557:
2553:
2549:
2545:
2542:
2537:
2533:
2530:
2524:
2519:
2518:
2517:
2516:
2512:
2508:
2500:
2476:
2472:
2468:
2464:
2460:
2456:
2455:
2454:
2450:
2446:
2442:
2438:
2435:
2431:
2430:
2429:
2425:
2421:
2418:
2416:
2415:
2414:
2410:
2406:
2401:
2397:
2394:
2392:
2387:
2385:
2379:
2378:
2377:
2373:
2369:
2365:
2363:
2359:
2355:
2351:
2347:
2343:
2342:
2341:
2337:
2333:
2329:
2325:
2324:
2323:
2319:
2315:
2311:
2308:
2307:
2306:
2302:
2298:
2294:
2290:
2287:
2284:You stated: "
2283:
2279:
2276:
2272:
2269:
2264:
2260:
2257:
2253:
2249:
2246:". You cited
2245:
2241:
2237:
2234:
2230:
2229:
2228:
2224:
2218:
2211:
2208:
2204:
2200:
2196:
2195:
2194:
2193:
2192:
2191:
2178:
2174:
2170:
2166:
2162:
2158:
2154:
2150:
2147:
2143:
2141:
2137:
2131:
2127:
2124:
2120:
2117:
2116:
2110:
2108:
2101:
2098:: Your first
2097:
2095:
2094:
2087:
2086:
2085:
2081:
2075:
2069:
2065:
2061:
2057:
2054:
2052:
2049:
2047:
2045:
2044:
2037:
2036:
2035:
2031:
2027:
2023:
2022:
2021:
2018:
2016:
2014:
2013:
2006:
2005:
2004:
2000:
1996:
1991:
1987:
1981:
1977:
1976:
1975:
1971:
1965:
1959:
1954:
1940:
1936:
1932:
1927:
1923:
1922:
1921:
1917:
1913:
1908:
1906:
1902:
1898:
1893:
1890:
1887:
1883:
1879:
1878:
1877:
1876:
1875:
1874:
1873:
1872:
1871:
1870:
1869:
1868:
1857:
1853:
1849:
1844:
1843:
1842:
1841:
1840:
1839:
1838:
1837:
1836:
1835:
1822:
1821:
1820:
1819:
1818:
1817:
1816:
1815:
1814:
1813:
1801:
1800:
1799:
1798:
1797:
1796:
1795:
1794:
1793:
1792:
1779:
1778:
1777:
1776:
1775:
1774:
1773:
1772:
1771:
1770:
1761:
1757:
1753:
1748:
1747:
1746:
1745:
1744:
1743:
1742:
1741:
1731:
1726:
1722:
1721:not optional.
1717:
1716:
1715:
1711:
1707:
1702:
1699:
1695:
1691:
1688:
1687:
1686:
1682:
1678:
1674:
1670:
1669:
1668:
1664:
1660:
1655:
1652:
1648:
1644:
1641:
1637:
1633:
1630:
1626:
1623:
1622:
1621:
1620:
1616:
1612:
1606:
1603:
1599:
1591:
1589:
1588:
1583:
1578:
1577:
1566:
1562:
1559:
1555:
1554:
1553:
1546:
1540:
1536:
1532:
1528:
1522:
1517:
1512:
1508:
1504:
1502:
1498:
1496:
1492:
1490:
1486:
1484:
1480:
1478:
1474:
1472:
1468:
1466:
1462:
1460:
1456:
1454:
1450:
1448:
1444:
1442:
1438:
1436:
1432:
1430:
1426:
1424:
1420:
1418:
1414:
1412:
1408:
1406:
1402:
1400:
1396:
1394:
1390:
1388:
1384:
1382:
1378:
1376:
1372:
1370:
1366:
1364:
1360:
1359:
1358:
1356:
1352:
1348:
1343:
1337:
1335:
1334:
1331:
1328:
1324:
1321:
1318:
1314:
1310:
1306:
1302:
1295:Article scope
1294:
1288:
1287:
1283:
1279:
1275:
1270:
1268:
1264:
1259:
1254:
1251:
1247:
1243:
1239:
1235:
1228:
1224:
1223:
1219:
1218:
1212:
1208:
1207:
1204:
1202:
1183:
1179:
1175:
1171:
1167:
1163:
1162:
1161:
1160:
1159:
1158:
1157:
1156:
1155:
1154:
1153:
1152:
1151:
1150:
1133:
1130:
1129:
1128:
1127:
1126:
1125:
1124:
1123:
1122:
1121:
1120:
1119:
1118:
1117:
1104:
1100:
1096:
1091:
1087:
1083:
1079:
1075:
1071:
1067:
1063:
1059:
1058:
1057:
1056:
1055:
1054:
1053:
1052:
1051:
1050:
1049:
1048:
1035:
1032:
1029:
1026:
1025:
1024:
1021:
1020:
1016:
1011:
1010:
1009:
1008:
1007:
1006:
1005:
1004:
1003:
1002:
995:
991:
987:
983:
979:
975:
971:
967:
963:
962:
961:
960:
959:
958:
951:
947:
943:
939:
935:
931:
927:
923:
919:
918:
917:
916:
915:
914:
905:
900:
896:
892:
888:
887:
886:
885:
884:
883:
874:
873:
872:
871:
870:
869:
862:
859:
852:
848:
845:
844:
843:
842:
841:
840:
839:
838:
834:
830:
826:
822:
814:
808:
807:
803:
799:
795:
791:
790:
783:
779:
776:
774:
770:
766:
765:
764:
762:
758:
751:
750:
749:
748:
744:
739:
736:
732:
731:
725:
721:
717:
716:
715:
714:
710:
706:
701:
691:
687:
683:
679:
674:
668:
660:
658:0-615-11453-9
655:
651:
644:
643:
642:
641:
638:
634:
627:1911 or 1912?
626:
624:
623:
620:
612:
608:
604:
600:
595:
594:
593:
590:
586:
582:
578:
574:
564:
557:
553:
549:
545:
542:was split to
541:
537:
534:
530:
529:
513:
510:(assessed as
509:
508:
500:
489:
482:
478:
477:
473:
469:
463:
460:
459:
456:
443:United States
437:
434:
432:
429:
427:
424:
422:
421:
417:
415:
412:
411:
408:
404:
403:
395:
384:
382:
379:
375:
374:
370:
363:
358:
357:United States
355:
352:
348:
335:
331:
325:
322:
321:
317:
311:
308:
307:
304:
287:
283:
282:
277:
273:
272:
264:
253:
251:
248:
244:
243:
239:
230:
227:
224:
220:
207:
206:
205:
199:
195:
191:
182:
178:
177:
173:
169:
163:
160:
159:
156:
139:
138:Trains Portal
135:
131:
127:
123:
119:
118:
108:
107:
106:
105:Trains Portal
101:
96:
90:
89:
85:
82:
78:
77:
73:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
2504:
2389:
2382:
2345:
2327:to the edit.
2292:
2285:
2274:
2243:
2133:
2128:Your second
2118:
2114:
2112:
2106:
2103:
2092:
2091:
2088:Response to
2042:
2041:
2011:
2010:
1957:
1724:
1720:
1607:
1601:
1595:
1573:
1570:
1545:source check
1524:
1518:
1515:
1344:
1341:
1319:
1298:
1271:
1255:
1231:
1215:Response to
1214:
1198:
1034:
1022:
949:
945:
941:
937:
929:
925:
921:
898:
854:
818:
793:
792:
786:
756:
755:
746:
740:
702:
695:
649:
630:
616:
568:
505:
467:
431:Project Talk
419:
400:
329:
279:
269:
202:
201:
189:
167:
132:. See also:
126:project page
115:
103:
102:
40:WikiProjects
2216:Sennecaster
2151:Your third
2073:Sennecaster
1985:Sennecaster
1963:Sennecaster
757:Don't panic
30:Start-class
2581:Categories
2536:NOVA Parks
1582:Report bug
276:U.S. state
130:discussion
2463:like this
2093:Susmuffin
2043:Susmuffin
2012:Susmuffin
1565:this tool
1558:this tool
1327:Mackensen
1313:Oanabay04
1242:Oanabay04
1234:WP:DETAIL
1227:WP:DETAIL
1166:WP:DETAIL
1132:WP:DETAIL
1095:Oanabay04
1015:WP:DETAIL
982:WP:DETAIL
851:WP:DETAIL
847:WP:DETAIL
829:Oanabay04
825:WP:DETAIL
667:cite book
2523:Tedickey
2507:TEDickey
1886:WP:CFORK
1824:article.
1700:did not.
1639:deleted.
1635:article.
1571:Cheers.—
1323:contribs
853:states:
769:non-free
619:Thetrick
585:contribs
577:Thetrick
573:unsigned
291:Virginia
281:Virginia
229:Virginia
194:included
136:and the
2445:Corker1
2405:Corker1
2332:Corker1
2297:Corker1
2169:Corker1
2026:Corker1
1995:Corker1
1958:general
1931:Corker1
1848:Corker1
1730:WP:IDHT
1706:Corker1
1659:Corker1
1351:my edit
1278:Anaxial
1174:Corker1
986:Corker1
678:Corker1
613:Comment
599:Corker1
552:history
470:on the
332:on the
232:B‑class
170:on the
2350:WP:CIR
2205:(from
1925:links.
1330:(talk)
1274:WP:AFD
1258:WP:ORG
1246:WP:ORG
1236:, but
1086:WP:ORG
436:Alerts
143:Trains
59:Trains
36:scale.
2433:page.
2399:time.
2256:WP:EL
2252:WP:EL
2248:WP:EL
2165:WP:OR
2161:WP:OR
2156:text.
2146:WP:OR
2123:WP:OR
2068:WP:OR
1989:this.
1598:WP:EL
1074:SEPTA
2568:talk
2511:talk
2471:talk
2449:talk
2424:talk
2409:talk
2372:talk
2358:talk
2336:talk
2318:talk
2301:talk
2222:Chat
2173:talk
2153:this
2130:this
2100:This
2079:Chat
2064:this
2060:this
2056:This
2030:talk
1999:talk
1969:Chat
1935:talk
1916:talk
1901:talk
1852:talk
1756:talk
1710:talk
1694:talk
1681:talk
1663:talk
1629:talk
1615:talk
1317:talk
1282:talk
1265:and
1250:WP:N
1238:WP:N
1178:talk
1099:talk
1078:MBTA
990:talk
976:and
968:and
858:Main
833:talk
802:talk
709:talk
682:talk
673:link
654:ISBN
603:talk
581:talk
2528:15.
2467:KoA
2239:it.
1725:not
1539:RfC
1509:to
940:or
637:NE2
546:on
462:Low
324:Mid
278:of
192:be
190:map
162:Low
2583::
2570:)
2534:A
2513:)
2473:)
2465:.
2451:)
2426:)
2411:)
2374:)
2360:)
2352:.
2346:my
2338:)
2320:)
2303:)
2225:)
2175:)
2167:.
2082:)
2062:,
2058:,
2032:)
2001:)
1972:)
1937:)
1918:)
1903:)
1854:)
1758:)
1712:)
1683:)
1665:)
1617:)
1602:24
1552:.
1547:}}
1543:{{
1284:)
1220::
1180:)
1101:)
1080:,
1076:,
1068:,
1064:,
992:)
835:)
804:)
796:--
711:)
684:)
669:}}
665:{{
605:)
587:)
583:•
514:).
360::
2566:(
2525::
2521:@
2509:(
2469:(
2447:(
2422:(
2407:(
2370:(
2356:(
2334:(
2316:(
2299:(
2219:(
2171:(
2119:"
2113:"
2076:(
2028:(
1997:(
1966:(
1933:(
1914:(
1899:(
1850:(
1754:(
1708:(
1692:(
1679:(
1661:(
1627:(
1613:(
1584:)
1580:(
1567:.
1560:.
1320:·
1315:(
1280:(
1176:(
1097:(
1017::
988:(
831:(
800:(
707:(
680:(
675:)
661:.
601:(
591:.
579:(
474:.
336:.
310:B
174:.
140:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.