Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:Whitewashing (censorship)

Source đź“ť

243: 222: 253: 453: 432: 1244: 348: 327: 558: 537: 358: 463: 191: 791:'On Events in Czechoslovakia: Facts, Documents, Press Reports and Eye-Witness Accounts (Moscow: Press Group of Soviet Journalists, 1968)' which is the book known as 'The White Book' and Robert Littell (ed.) whose introduction to 'The Czech Black Book' (London: Pall Mall Press, 1969) pp. viii-ix. might be of interest to anyone wishing to know a little more 1441:, as I think that is a more suitable and all-embracing category that can encompass all of what is being discussed above, whether it is sources of censorship, propaganda, or other elements – all pertain to the communication or non-communication of information. Another alternative is (public relations), but it's a bit narrower and not my first preference. 997: 568: 1114:
Agreed. Also will add that those edits would have been reversed regardless of content, written like personal essays, not adequately cited and littered with NPOV issues - while I personally agree with the point of view being imparted, the language very clearly shows that it has been written by someone
859:
Describing Pinkwashing as a form of 'Israeli hasbara propaganda' is clearly a violation of WP:NPOV. Frankly, this term is not related to Whitewash at all IMO, but if someone wants to argue that it deserves to stay here, the description of this logical fallacy must be NPOV (ie descriptive and not an
669:
Me too! I'm still sure it is true. (ESV: Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you are like whitewashed tombs, which outwardly appear beautiful, but within are full of dead peoples bones and pall uncleanness) 'First use' here in section 'etymology' - note that those people who used the
1531:
Mostly, yes, as long as we aren't dismissing any references to the perceived relationship between Whitewashing and censorship, I don't have any objection. I do agree that a majority of RS on Whitewashing refers to propaganda/media, but there still remains relative coverage of references to acts of
1516:
I would say art and film fall under "media", rather than communications – a distinction that emerges in the discipline name of "media and communications" – and I would suggest that censorship is best viewed as a communications policy enacted by organisations, governments or oneself (in the case of
1168:
Disagree. The term itself doesn't actually have anything to do with race, if the etymology section of this exact article is to be trusted. I see the same problem being discussed with the term "blacklist" (a word that apparently comes from a grieving son's dramatic prose), which I heard people have
832:
Certainly Animal Farm dealt with Whitewashing, but not any more so than most dystopian stories. It seems like this entry sort of makes it seem like whitewashing is a rare phenomena in media, which is anything but true. It also places a little too much emphasis on the involvement of the Soviet
649:
I was under the impression that the use of the term 'whitewash' comes from the Matthew 23:27 - "Alas for you, Scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites, for you are just like whitewashed sepulchres, the outside of which pleases the eye, though inside they are full of dead men's bones and of all that is
1359:– It's not a censorship practice, which is a direct suppression of material, usually by force or threat of force by some entity with power such as a government. It's a propaganda or public relations practice, and that is what the article talks about. Whitewashing is pretty closely related to 763:
rendering a major, early non-white science fiction protagonist, Juan "Johnny" Rico, as a square-jawed white guy, John "Johnny" Rico. This article is the closest one Knowledge (XXG) has to that, but it's still not really addressing the same thing. As best I can tell, somebody needs to write
960:
And on a matter of factual accuracy, since I don't want to circulate something that can't be proven... where did THEY get it? How do you fact-check something over 200 years old unless you happen to have the newspaper on hand? Just wondering about that last bit.
940:
The quote in question is the first-ever-used Whitewashing quote: "'if you do not whitewash President Adams speedily, the Democrats, like swarms of flies, will bespatter him all over, and make you both as speckled as a dirty wall, and as black as the devil.'"
1169:
been trying to replace due to being "inherently racist", but never saw anything sticking (or proof that either term is actually based on race). At best this issue is a false alarm, and at worst the word's origin has been whitewashed itself.
879:
There seems to be empty threats made at traditional enemies of US officials. And yet we have no modern examples of whitewashing US (or Israeli) crimes and warcrimes. Not out right propaganda (which there is many of) but casual whitewashing.
1501:
I suspect that art and film might fall more easily into the propaganda category. Including censorship, all three might seem to fall into the (communications) category, but censorship is sort of the opposite of communication. Thoughts?
1045:
This article is about censorship. The material you are adding is about a completely different topic, casting white actors in non-white roles in media, and does not belong in this article. We already have an article about that topic,
1395:
An interesting proposal, however, what evidence is there to suggest Whitewashing does not include the practice of censorship or suppression of material? The history of Whitewashing seems to include the practice of omission in it's
1363:
really. "Whitewashing (coverup)" would be reasonable too maybe, and sugarcoat, launder, excuse, and other terms could be in play too; there's no one perfect term, but it says here that "Whitewashing (propaganda)" is the best term.
1163:
The bias of the word “whitewashing” needs to be addressed. ‪The use of “white” as a synonym for “bad” is a microaggression. Somewhere the bias inherent in this phrase needs to be acknowledged and a more suitable word suggested.
1139:, but I tend to avoid editing articles like this. While I do have a personal point of view on the topic, it's not something I'd attempt to share. In looking at the history, all I would add is that some editors are approaching 153: 1071:
you need to stop reinserting this material and start communicating. The text you are adding has nothing to do with the subject of this article, and does not belong here. Pinging other recent editors of this article:
670:
term, knew their bible, and referenced without indicating source, because they knew everybody knows. And is it really true that first use was in USA? American bias again, I'm afraid. Or maybe not. Research needed.
1115:
with strong personal views on the matter. I understand it’s an emotive issue but if we don’t write neutrally then only people who agree with that viewpoint would actually consider it. Communicate!!
935:
Hi, I'm a newbie. I noticed this page had a "citation needed" for the whitewashing quote at the beginning, so I googled it and I think I found a citation. I just don't know how to list it.
147: 788:
I just added the bit about 'The White Book' as an example of whitewashing, but realised I wasn't sure how to put references down the bottom. If anyone wants to do this, they're
309: 1671: 299: 1517:
self-censorship). Though my impression in any case is that most whitewashing involves talking over the top of negative information rather than censoring it specifically.
44: 1401:
Omitting or downplaying historical events, figures, or issues related to systemic racism, inequality and violence, are seen by some sources as examples of Whitewashing.
1284: 1280: 1666: 275: 624: 519: 79: 414: 1706: 1011:
In the South African state some enterprises behaved in a whitewahing manner. Also enterprises from other countries that were trading with them althout the
614: 1696: 509: 266: 227: 1681: 404: 1711: 1701: 590: 85: 1691: 485: 1532:
omission, prohibition, bans, censorship etc... as a form of Whitewashing according to certain notable organizations, historians and educators.
1404:
That is not to say propaganda is incorrect or undue, far from it. Point being that it would help to examine sources on the subject more closely.
1686: 1676: 380: 1020: 840: 813:
The term "Healthwashing" refers to situations like listing methods of cooking which produce carcinogens under titles like healthy recipes.
30: 794:
also if anyone can be bothered, perhaps the paragraph could be reworded - it sounds a little clumsy to me but i'm too tired to change it.
1292: 1283:
within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the
980:
Nevermind. The discussion page isn't the place to ask a question, anyway; that's what the 'help me' template or the Help Desk is for :P
915: 242: 221: 581: 542: 890: 814: 717: 168: 476: 437: 99: 135: 371: 332: 104: 20: 74: 202: 908:
is a decent source of some US based historical whitewashing to go with Japan's Nanking massacre. 22:14, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
65: 1641:: Broad agreement that the article should be renamed. Hopefully, an extra week's discussion will converge on a new title. 1592: 1319: 985: 970: 755:
Yeah, "whitewashing" seems to have some currency for that; other examples that come to mind are the cover art thing with
129: 1614: 1276: 1288: 125: 1464: 1460: 1438: 1133: 1255: 955:
Do I list the web page that I got it from (i.e., the New World Encyclopedia) or the original source (the Aurora)?
109: 1350: 1251: 24: 1716: 1024: 981: 966: 258: 175: 844: 765: 208: 190: 919: 696:? He removed his opponents from the pictures and more general, even killing them - it's rather the Whitewash. 1307: 894: 818: 721: 911: 886: 836: 713: 799: 55: 1537: 1522: 1507: 1484: 1472: 1446: 1426: 1412: 1369: 865: 675: 658: 589:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
484:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
379:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
274:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1296: 1212:
The term itself just uses white as a synonym for "totally clean you guys, don't look any further haha".
70: 1066: 1040: 861: 1494: 1105: 1101: 1055: 1051: 1047: 141: 795: 1489: 1209:
Not that that has any actual relation to whitewashing, besides maybe that thing Stalin liked doing.
1120: 773: 161: 1646: 1384: 1200: 1360: 1220: 1174: 1129:
I appreciate the ping, but I haven't really contributed to the article proper. I did add the
760: 573: 452: 431: 271: 51: 1533: 1518: 1503: 1468: 1442: 1422: 1408: 1365: 671: 1140: 1082: 363: 1567: 860:
accusation or claim), attributed properly, and placed in an appropriate context. Thanks.
1421:
I would agree that Whitewashing may include a combination of propaganda and censorship.
950:), which lists it, verbatim, with a reference: "Aurora, (Philadelphia, July 21, 1800)." 1148: 1116: 1089: 947: 769: 737: 468: 1650: 1541: 1526: 1511: 1476: 1450: 1430: 1416: 1388: 1224: 1204: 1178: 1152: 1123: 1109: 1059: 1028: 989: 974: 898: 869: 848: 822: 803: 777: 749: 725: 700: 679: 661: 357: 347: 326: 1660: 1642: 1380: 1196: 745: 1216: 1170: 756: 1075: 557: 536: 1615:"Students, teachers and advocates fight against censorship in Alabama schools" 697: 586: 563: 462: 458: 353: 248: 1481:
That's not a bad idea. Currently there seems to be three other iterations...
1144: 1096: 1005: 905: 654: 481: 1050:. Please read that article and decide if you have anything to add there. 741: 706:
Some serious accusations. Where is your evidence that he was responsible?
376: 1016: 946:
I found it on the page "Censorship", in the New World Encyclopedia (
1192: 1188: 1184: 1215:
Can understand why people would try to connect the dots, though.
1271: 1238: 1012: 736:
I've recently been hearing this word referring to things like
184: 15: 833:
Union. I would suggest omitting the section entirely.
1463:
is a good idea. I am willing to change the proposal to
1355: 1340: 1336: 1332: 1260: 1183:"The use of “white” as a synonym for “bad”" Given that 160: 948:
http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Censorship
585:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 480:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 375:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 270:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 174: 1121:If you have a problem, don't mess with my puppy... 906:https://en.wikipedia.org/Lies_My_Teacher_Told_Me 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 1187:as a color has a traditional association with 828:Fictional Usage Section A little too specific? 284:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Freedom of speech 8: 1159:The bias of this word needs to be addressed 1143:and should exercise caution at this point. 188: 1250:It has been proposed in this section that 909: 688:Stalin adjusted the photographs with Lenin 531: 426: 321: 216: 1672:Low-importance Freedom of speech articles 1593:"The (White) Washing of American History" 1597:Florida A & M University Law Review 1558: 732:Replacing Asian characters with Whites? 533: 428: 323: 218: 1667:Start-Class Freedom of speech articles 599:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Psychology 287:Template:WikiProject Freedom of speech 494:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Sociology 7: 904:Agreed. Would you mind adding some? 579:This article is within the scope of 474:This article is within the scope of 389:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Politics 369:This article is within the scope of 264:This article is within the scope of 1603:(1): 16–18 – via Scholarly Commons. 1019:over some parts of South Africa. -- 207:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 1707:Low-importance psychology articles 1467:... whichever seems most popular. 14: 1697:Low-importance sociology articles 1372:) 04:00, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 1275:will list this discussion on the 928:Newbie question on citing sources 50:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome! 1682:Low-importance politics articles 1242: 1233:Requested move 12 September 2024 995: 566: 556: 535: 461: 451: 430: 356: 346: 325: 251: 241: 220: 189: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 1712:WikiProject Psychology articles 1702:Start-Class psychology articles 1568:"Whitewashing American History" 619:This article has been rated as 602:Template:WikiProject Psychology 514:This article has been rated as 409:This article has been rated as 304:This article has been rated as 1692:Start-Class sociology articles 1651:15:49, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 1542:22:23, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 1527:05:25, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 1512:04:19, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 1477:03:23, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 1451:14:24, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 1431:08:06, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 1417:06:21, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 1389:15:49, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 1195:, this is unlikely to change. 975:02:06, 16 September 2013 (UTC) 653:This could be synonymous with 497:Template:WikiProject Sociology 1: 1687:WikiProject Politics articles 1677:Start-Class politics articles 1591:Petterson, Eric (Fall 2022). 1566:Wills, Matthew (2019-02-18). 1465:Whitewashing (communications) 1461:Whitewashing (communications) 1439:Whitewashing (communications) 990:03:35, 17 November 2013 (UTC) 593:and see a list of open tasks. 488:and see a list of open tasks. 392:Template:WikiProject Politics 383:and see a list of open tasks. 278:and see a list of open tasks. 267:WikiProject Freedom of speech 42:Put new text under old text. 1287:). Please base arguments on 1225:11:32, 27 January 2023 (UTC) 1205:09:26, 27 January 2023 (UTC) 1179:18:40, 25 January 2023 (UTC) 1029:22:12, 29 October 2019 (UTC) 870:05:35, 7 February 2013 (UTC) 804:16:33, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 662:08:14, 17 January 2007 (UTC) 1619:Southern Poverty Law Center 1437:I would prefer and support 849:06:10, 7 January 2013 (UTC) 1733: 1124:21:50, 30 April 2021 (UTC) 1110:21:25, 30 April 2021 (UTC) 1060:20:40, 30 April 2021 (UTC) 993: 899:19:33, 7 August 2013 (UTC) 750:22:04, 15 April 2008 (UTC) 726:19:31, 7 August 2013 (UTC) 625:project's importance scale 520:project's importance scale 415:project's importance scale 310:project's importance scale 290:Freedom of speech articles 1356:Whitewashing (propaganda) 1351:Whitewashing (censorship) 1261:Whitewashing (propaganda) 1252:Whitewashing (censorship) 778:16:30, 12 July 2011 (UTC) 680:04:47, 4 April 2017 (UTC) 618: 551: 513: 446: 408: 341: 303: 236: 215: 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 25:Whitewashing (censorship) 823:16:30, 1 July 2010 (UTC) 766:Whitewash (media racism) 259:Freedom of speech portal 1153:00:33, 1 May 2021 (UTC) 701:09:18, 4 May 2007 (UTC) 1291:, and keep discussion 582:WikiProject Psychology 197:This article is rated 75:avoid personal attacks 1485:Whitewashing (beauty) 1034:Whitewashing in media 477:WikiProject Sociology 201:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 100:Neutral point of view 1495:Whitewashing in film 1320:requested move/dated 1308:subst:requested move 1289:article title policy 1285:closing instructions 1279:current discussions 1048:Whitewashing in film 372:WikiProject Politics 105:No original research 1490:Whitewashing in art 982:meteor_sandwich_yum 967:Meteor sandwich yum 605:psychology articles 500:sociology articles 203:content assessment 86:dispute resolution 47: 1653: 1639:Relisting comment 1391: 1361:spin (propaganda) 1348: 1347: 1343: 1326: 1256:renamed and moved 1134:short description 923: 914:comment added by 889:comment added by 839:comment added by 761:Starship Troopers 759:and the movie of 716:comment added by 639: 638: 635: 634: 631: 630: 574:Psychology portal 530: 529: 526: 525: 425: 424: 421: 420: 395:politics articles 320: 319: 316: 315: 281:Freedom of speech 272:Freedom of speech 228:Freedom of speech 183: 182: 66:Assume good faith 43: 1724: 1637: 1629: 1628: 1626: 1625: 1611: 1605: 1604: 1588: 1582: 1581: 1579: 1578: 1563: 1373: 1358: 1328: 1323: 1311: 1302: 1274: 1263: 1246: 1245: 1239: 1138: 1132: 1100: 1093: 1086: 1079: 1070: 1044: 999: 998: 901: 851: 728: 659:HisSpaceResearch 657:in some cases.-- 607: 606: 603: 600: 597: 576: 571: 570: 569: 560: 553: 552: 547: 539: 532: 502: 501: 498: 495: 492: 471: 466: 465: 455: 448: 447: 442: 434: 427: 397: 396: 393: 390: 387: 366: 361: 360: 350: 343: 342: 337: 329: 322: 292: 291: 288: 285: 282: 261: 256: 255: 254: 245: 238: 237: 232: 224: 217: 200: 194: 193: 185: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 16: 1732: 1731: 1727: 1726: 1725: 1723: 1722: 1721: 1717:Requested moves 1657: 1656: 1634: 1633: 1632: 1623: 1621: 1613: 1612: 1608: 1590: 1589: 1585: 1576: 1574: 1565: 1564: 1560: 1396:implementation. 1354: 1344: 1317: 1305: 1277:requested moves 1270: 1259: 1243: 1235: 1161: 1136: 1130: 1094: 1087: 1080: 1073: 1064: 1038: 1036: 1021:178.197.230.175 1009: 1002: 1001: 996: 932: 884: 877: 857: 855:Re: Pinkwashing 834: 830: 811: 786: 734: 711: 690: 647: 604: 601: 598: 595: 594: 572: 567: 565: 545: 499: 496: 493: 490: 489: 467: 460: 440: 394: 391: 388: 385: 384: 364:Politics portal 362: 355: 335: 289: 286: 283: 280: 279: 257: 252: 250: 230: 198: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 1730: 1728: 1720: 1719: 1714: 1709: 1704: 1699: 1694: 1689: 1684: 1679: 1674: 1669: 1659: 1658: 1655: 1654: 1631: 1630: 1606: 1583: 1557: 1556: 1552: 1551: 1550: 1549: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1545: 1544: 1499: 1498: 1497: 1492: 1487: 1479: 1454: 1453: 1434: 1433: 1419: 1405: 1402: 1398: 1397: 1346: 1345: 1327: 1301: 1267: 1266: 1247: 1234: 1231: 1230: 1229: 1228: 1227: 1213: 1210: 1181: 1160: 1157: 1156: 1155: 1035: 1032: 1008: 1003: 994: 931: 925: 876: 873: 856: 853: 841:98.207.109.128 829: 826: 810: 807: 785: 782: 781: 780: 768:or something. 733: 730: 708: 707: 689: 686: 685: 684: 683: 682: 646: 643: 641: 637: 636: 633: 632: 629: 628: 621:Low-importance 617: 611: 610: 608: 591:the discussion 578: 577: 561: 549: 548: 546:Low‑importance 540: 528: 527: 524: 523: 516:Low-importance 512: 506: 505: 503: 486:the discussion 473: 472: 469:Society portal 456: 444: 443: 441:Low‑importance 435: 423: 422: 419: 418: 411:Low-importance 407: 401: 400: 398: 381:the discussion 368: 367: 351: 339: 338: 336:Low‑importance 330: 318: 317: 314: 313: 306:Low-importance 302: 296: 295: 293: 276:the discussion 263: 262: 246: 234: 233: 231:Low‑importance 225: 213: 212: 206: 195: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1729: 1718: 1715: 1713: 1710: 1708: 1705: 1703: 1700: 1698: 1695: 1693: 1690: 1688: 1685: 1683: 1680: 1678: 1675: 1673: 1670: 1668: 1665: 1664: 1662: 1652: 1648: 1644: 1640: 1636: 1635: 1620: 1616: 1610: 1607: 1602: 1598: 1594: 1587: 1584: 1573: 1569: 1562: 1559: 1555: 1543: 1539: 1535: 1530: 1529: 1528: 1524: 1520: 1515: 1514: 1513: 1509: 1505: 1500: 1496: 1493: 1491: 1488: 1486: 1483: 1482: 1480: 1478: 1474: 1470: 1466: 1462: 1459:Hmmm, yeah. 1458: 1457: 1456: 1455: 1452: 1448: 1444: 1440: 1436: 1435: 1432: 1428: 1424: 1420: 1418: 1414: 1410: 1406: 1403: 1400: 1399: 1394: 1393: 1392: 1390: 1386: 1382: 1379: 1378: 1371: 1367: 1362: 1357: 1352: 1342: 1338: 1334: 1331: 1325: 1321: 1315: 1309: 1300: 1298: 1294: 1290: 1286: 1282: 1278: 1273: 1265: 1262: 1257: 1253: 1248: 1241: 1240: 1237: 1232: 1226: 1222: 1218: 1214: 1211: 1208: 1207: 1206: 1202: 1198: 1194: 1190: 1186: 1182: 1180: 1176: 1172: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1158: 1154: 1150: 1146: 1142: 1135: 1128: 1127: 1126: 1125: 1122: 1118: 1112: 1111: 1107: 1103: 1098: 1091: 1084: 1077: 1068: 1062: 1061: 1057: 1053: 1049: 1042: 1033: 1031: 1030: 1026: 1022: 1018: 1014: 1007: 1004: 992: 991: 987: 983: 978: 977: 976: 972: 968: 963: 962: 957: 956: 952: 951: 949: 943: 942: 937: 936: 929: 926: 924: 921: 917: 916:216.21.162.76 913: 907: 902: 900: 896: 892: 888: 881: 875:Heavy US bias 874: 872: 871: 867: 863: 854: 852: 850: 846: 842: 838: 827: 825: 824: 820: 816: 809:Healthwashing 808: 806: 805: 801: 797: 792: 789: 784:Prague Spring 783: 779: 775: 771: 767: 762: 758: 754: 753: 752: 751: 747: 743: 739: 731: 729: 727: 723: 719: 715: 705: 704: 703: 702: 699: 695: 687: 681: 677: 673: 668: 667: 666: 665: 664: 663: 660: 656: 651: 644: 642: 626: 622: 616: 613: 612: 609: 592: 588: 584: 583: 575: 564: 562: 559: 555: 554: 550: 544: 541: 538: 534: 521: 517: 511: 508: 507: 504: 487: 483: 479: 478: 470: 464: 459: 457: 454: 450: 449: 445: 439: 436: 433: 429: 416: 412: 406: 403: 402: 399: 382: 378: 374: 373: 365: 359: 354: 352: 349: 345: 344: 340: 334: 331: 328: 324: 311: 307: 301: 298: 297: 294: 277: 273: 269: 268: 260: 249: 247: 244: 240: 239: 235: 229: 226: 223: 219: 214: 210: 204: 196: 192: 187: 186: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 1638: 1622:. Retrieved 1618: 1609: 1600: 1596: 1586: 1575:. Retrieved 1571: 1561: 1553: 1376: 1375: 1349: 1329: 1313: 1303: 1268: 1249: 1236: 1162: 1113: 1063: 1037: 1010: 979: 965: 964: 959: 958: 954: 953: 945: 944: 939: 938: 934: 933: 927: 910:— Preceding 903: 891:70.53.14.163 885:— Preceding 882: 878: 858: 835:— Preceding 831: 815:71.100.5.109 812: 793: 790: 787: 757:Liar (novel) 735: 718:70.53.14.163 712:— Preceding 709: 693: 691: 652: 648: 640: 620: 580: 515: 475: 410: 370: 305: 265: 209:WikiProjects 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 1572:JSTOR Daily 1519:Iskandar323 1469:Herostratus 1443:Iskandar323 1366:Herostratus 1341:direct move 1333:current log 1304:Please use 1067:Khellmers21 1041:Khellmers21 862:Kinetochore 672:BirgittaMTh 650:unclean." 199:Start-class 148:free images 31:not a forum 1661:Categories 1624:2024-09-13 1577:2024-09-13 1554:References 1377:Relisting. 1337:target log 1102:CodeTalker 1083:CLCStudent 1052:CodeTalker 930:(RESOLVED) 770:—chaos5023 596:Psychology 587:Psychology 543:Psychology 1324:directly. 1117:John wiki 1090:John wiki 1015:spoke an 1006:Apartheit 796:Storleone 694:Whitewash 655:euphemism 491:Sociology 482:sociology 438:Sociology 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 1643:Favonian 1407:Cheers. 1381:Favonian 1293:succinct 1197:Dimadick 1000:Resolved 912:unsigned 887:unsigned 837:unsigned 714:unsigned 692:Is it a 645:Untitled 386:Politics 377:politics 333:Politics 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 1281:subpage 1017:embargo 623:on the 518:on the 413:on the 308:on the 154:WP refs 142:scholar 1330:Links: 1217:cogsan 1193:ghosts 1171:cogsan 1145:— Ched 1141:WP:3RR 1076:Buidhe 205:scale. 126:Google 1312:. Do 1297:civil 1189:death 1185:white 698:Xx236 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 1647:talk 1538:talk 1523:talk 1508:talk 1473:talk 1447:talk 1427:talk 1413:talk 1385:talk 1370:talk 1316:use 1295:and 1221:talk 1201:talk 1191:and 1175:talk 1149:talk 1106:talk 1097:Ched 1056:talk 1025:talk 986:talk 971:talk 920:talk 895:talk 883:-G 866:talk 845:talk 819:talk 800:talk 774:talk 746:talk 738:this 722:talk 710:-G 676:talk 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 1314:not 1272:bot 1258:to 1254:be 1013:UNO 742:Esn 615:Low 510:Low 405:Low 300:Low 176:TWL 1663:: 1649:) 1617:. 1601:17 1599:. 1595:. 1570:. 1540:) 1534:DN 1525:) 1510:) 1504:DN 1475:) 1449:) 1429:) 1423:DN 1415:) 1409:DN 1387:) 1374:— 1353:→ 1339:• 1335:• 1322:}} 1318:{{ 1310:}} 1306:{{ 1299:. 1269:A 1223:) 1203:) 1177:) 1151:) 1137:}} 1131:{{ 1119:: 1108:) 1058:) 1027:) 988:) 973:) 922:) 897:) 868:) 847:) 821:) 802:) 776:) 748:) 740:. 724:) 678:) 156:) 54:; 1645:( 1627:. 1580:. 1536:( 1521:( 1506:( 1471:( 1445:( 1425:( 1411:( 1383:( 1368:( 1264:. 1219:( 1199:( 1173:( 1147:( 1104:( 1099:: 1095:@ 1092:: 1088:@ 1085:: 1081:@ 1078:: 1074:@ 1069:: 1065:@ 1054:( 1043:: 1039:@ 1023:( 984:( 969:( 918:( 893:( 864:( 843:( 817:( 798:( 772:( 744:( 720:( 674:( 627:. 522:. 417:. 312:. 211:: 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 58:.

Index

talk page
Whitewashing (censorship)
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL

content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Freedom of speech
WikiProject icon
Freedom of speech portal

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑