628:
278:
251:
731:, have mentions of such information in the institutions' respective Knowledge (XXG) article. These two lists are not exhaustive and are not inclusive of all institutions sanctioned or censured by AAUP. AAUP sanctions and censures appear to be so common that such an action should not be notable or relevant enough to appear in this article nor is the event notable enough in the institution's history to require such a sizable chunk of article dedicated to it.
288:
443:
425:
381:
526:
505:
393:
220:
618:
597:
714:). The AAUP sanction information makes up more than half of the Academics section of this article and relies exclusively on a single source directly from the organization issuing the "sanction". No reputable third party sources, unbiased sources, or sources containing information on the university's official response to the claims are cited.
735:
provided is notable enough to be included on
Knowledge (XXG), I believe that given the number of institutions targeted by AAUP sanctions and the large number of targeted institutions which do not have active or recognized AAUP union chapters, the information might be better suited for its own Knowledge (XXG) article or as an addition to the
921:
censure information on most university pages as of yet, one of the major concerns on my part regarding AAUP-related censures is that in addition to being a think tank type organization, the AAUP also serves as a labor union through its various arms and affiliates, which is mentioned in the collective bargaining section of the
540:, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Lutheranism on Knowledge (XXG). This includes but is not limited to Lutheran churches, Lutheran theology and worship, and biographies of notable Lutherans. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
925:
article. This can be especially concerning when a private institution such as
Wittenberg or Canisius does not recognize the authority of the AAUP. An AAUP censure or sanction can often be the result of a conflict/dispute that does not necessarily exist when including censure/sanction information from
920:
page and will create a discussion there. I agree about including censure information in some way. I am not generally opposed to including censure and sanction information within articles, even this one, but I think it requires more discussion. Beyond the fact that we do not systemically include AAUP
734:
The continuous reversion of this information, which is neither well-cited nor well established among any university page on
Knowledge (XXG), seems to particularly target Wittenberg University for reasons that are not particularly clear. If the weight of the evidence shows that the information
885:
Thanks. I have genuinely thought about our lack of a systematic process to include AAUP information in articles; I think it would be very helpful and appropriate to explicitly note if institutions have been censured, I just haven't figured out how we can do this in a way that is sustainable.
824:" The amount of space dedicated to sanctions and censures in this article -- between the APA and AAUP censures -- is probably not appropriate, especially given that it is uncommon for Knowledge (XXG) articles for colleges and universities to contain such information where it exists.
822:...a description of isolated events, quotes, criticisms, or news reports related to one subject may be verifiable and impartial, but still disproportionate to their overall significance to the article topic. This is a concern especially for recent events that may be in the news.
720:, I was not able to locate any mention of AAUP related sanctions or censures in the Knowledge (XXG) articles for these institutions. Of the seven institutions which were the target of an AAUP investigation for institutional policies arising from the COVID-19 crisis
805:
the tone of
Knowledge (XXG) articles should be impartial, neither endorsing nor rejecting a particular point of view. Try not to quote directly from participants engaged in a heated dispute; instead, summarize and present the arguments in an impartial
1048:
759:
I do agree with you that we are very inconsistent in how we include this kind of information in articles. In this instance, however, the solution is to add the information to those other articles and not to delete it from this
688:
153:
1043:
678:
781:
Sorry, but I believe you are the one misunderstanding
Knowledge (XXG) policies. While a neutral point of view is required for writing articles, Knowledge (XXG)'s policy on citations states that we should rely on
654:
756:
I disagree and I worry that you are misunderstanding or misapplying
Knowledge (XXG) policies. In particular, sources are not required to be neutral; that only applies to what we ourselves write in articles.
1038:
641:
602:
763:
If it's any consolation, I am amenable to the information in this article being edited or shortened. I am simply not amenable to completely deleting it as it is pertinent and well-sourced.
983:
318:
710:
I do not believe the AAUP censure information is appropriate for this article and should either be removed or better cited. The information does not contain any neutral sources (see
471:
335:
147:
717:
Beyond improving the citations, this section is still not likely a good fit for the article. Of the 57 institutions with official, non-COVID-19 related censures from the AAUP
371:
930:
that also appears in this article (which I have never disputed or requested changes to) or probationary status information from accreditation organizations such as
808:" AAUP is directly involved in a dispute with the university and more than half of the disputed paragraph in this article is direct quote from the AAUP itself. In
579:
1013:
978:
361:
467:
325:
922:
736:
44:
79:
1023:
569:
1003:
633:
330:
1008:
1033:
993:
545:
450:
430:
786:" when possible. While a non-neutral source may fit, we still have other concerns. Simply having a citation does not meet the requirement for being
85:
973:
1028:
301:
256:
1018:
650:
190:
30:
541:
536:
510:
998:
927:
313:
99:
816:", which this article also fails to do. I would also ponder whether this article meets the requirements for balance as mentioned in
168:
104:
20:
135:
309:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
74:
231:
988:
65:
406:
261:
129:
931:
185:
125:
109:
199:
721:
711:
237:
175:
800:
55:
728:
653:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
24:
70:
293:
809:
219:
161:
141:
859:'s most recent edit as more appropriate, unless there are other objections, and leave it at that.
817:
718:
943:
864:
838:
746:
204:
277:
250:
891:
768:
51:
917:
784:...reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy
724:
455:
201:
833:
Based upon the foregoing, I do not believe this information is pertinent or well-sourced.
967:
939:
860:
834:
742:
646:
306:
799:
Please see the following sections of
Knowledge (XXG)'s article on point of view. In
887:
856:
764:
203:
947:
895:
868:
842:
772:
750:
398:
623:
459:
388:
283:
442:
424:
305:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
380:
1049:
C-Class
National Register of Historic Places articles of Low-importance
617:
596:
525:
504:
463:
935:
663:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject National Register of Historic Places
466:
on Knowledge (XXG). Please visit the project page to join the
213:
205:
15:
1044:
Low-importance National Register of Historic Places articles
379:
544:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
666:
Template:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places
645:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S.
160:
1039:
C-Class National Register of Historic Places articles
454:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
174:
916:I would also advocate for a similar change on the
984:C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
642:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
923:American Association of University Professors
737:American Association of University Professors
669:National Register of Historic Places articles
8:
480:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Higher education
634:National Register of Historic Places portal
591:
499:
419:
245:
346:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject United States
926:other organizations such as that of the
814:...describing the opposing views clearly
593:
554:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Lutheranism
501:
421:
247:
217:
1014:WikiProject Higher education articles
979:Low-importance United States articles
483:Template:WikiProject Higher education
7:
660:National Register of Historic Places
651:National Register of Historic Places
639:This article is within the scope of
603:National Register of Historic Places
448:This article is within the scope of
299:This article is within the scope of
1024:Mid-importance Lutheranism articles
236:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
1004:WikiProject United States articles
928:American Philosophical Association
349:Template:WikiProject United States
14:
1009:C-Class Higher education articles
50:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome!
1034:WikiProject Lutheranism articles
994:Unknown-importance Ohio articles
626:
616:
595:
557:Template:WikiProject Lutheranism
524:
503:
441:
423:
391:
286:
276:
249:
218:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
683:This article has been rated as
574:This article has been rated as
366:This article has been rated as
974:C-Class United States articles
1:
1029:C-Class Christianity articles
812:, we find that we should be "
657:and see a list of open tasks.
404:This article is supported by
42:Put new text under old text.
1019:C-Class Lutheranism articles
451:WikiProject Higher education
1065:
948:17:35, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
932:Higher Learning Commission
896:16:21, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
869:15:45, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
843:14:55, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
773:14:06, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
751:03:58, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
689:project's importance scale
580:project's importance scale
372:project's importance scale
999:WikiProject Ohio articles
706:AAUP Sanction Information
682:
611:
573:
519:
486:Higher education articles
436:
387:
365:
302:WikiProject United States
271:
244:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
470:, and see the project's
307:United States of America
537:WikiProject Lutheranism
384:
352:United States articles
226:This article is rated
75:avoid personal attacks
989:C-Class Ohio articles
820:, which states that "
803:, it is stated that "
729:Wittenberg University
532:Wittenberg University
383:
230:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
100:Neutral point of view
25:Wittenberg University
723:, only two of them,
560:Lutheranism articles
294:United States portal
105:No original research
320:Articles Requested!
474:for useful advice.
385:
232:content assessment
86:dispute resolution
47:
703:
702:
699:
698:
695:
694:
590:
589:
586:
585:
498:
497:
494:
493:
472:article guideline
418:
417:
414:
413:
212:
211:
66:Assume good faith
43:
1056:
918:Canisius College
725:Canisius College
671:
670:
667:
664:
661:
636:
631:
630:
629:
620:
613:
612:
607:
599:
592:
562:
561:
558:
555:
552:
528:
521:
520:
515:
507:
500:
488:
487:
484:
481:
478:
477:Higher education
456:higher education
445:
438:
437:
431:Higher education
427:
420:
407:WikiProject Ohio
401:
396:
395:
394:
354:
353:
350:
347:
344:
296:
291:
290:
289:
280:
273:
272:
267:
264:
253:
246:
229:
223:
222:
214:
206:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
1064:
1063:
1059:
1058:
1057:
1055:
1054:
1053:
964:
963:
708:
668:
665:
662:
659:
658:
632:
627:
625:
605:
559:
556:
553:
550:
549:
513:
485:
482:
479:
476:
475:
397:
392:
390:
351:
348:
345:
342:
341:
340:
326:Become a Member
292:
287:
285:
265:
259:
227:
208:
207:
202:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
1062:
1060:
1052:
1051:
1046:
1041:
1036:
1031:
1026:
1021:
1016:
1011:
1006:
1001:
996:
991:
986:
981:
976:
966:
965:
959:
958:
957:
956:
955:
954:
953:
952:
951:
950:
905:
904:
903:
902:
901:
900:
899:
898:
876:
875:
874:
873:
872:
871:
855:I will accept
848:
847:
846:
845:
828:
827:
826:
825:
794:
793:
792:
791:
776:
775:
761:
757:
712:WP:BESTSOURCES
707:
704:
701:
700:
697:
696:
693:
692:
685:Low-importance
681:
675:
674:
672:
655:the discussion
649:listed on the
647:historic sites
638:
637:
621:
609:
608:
606:Low‑importance
600:
588:
587:
584:
583:
576:Mid-importance
572:
566:
565:
563:
529:
517:
516:
514:Mid‑importance
508:
496:
495:
492:
491:
489:
446:
434:
433:
428:
416:
415:
412:
411:
403:
402:
386:
376:
375:
368:Low-importance
364:
358:
357:
355:
339:
338:
333:
328:
323:
316:
314:Template Usage
310:
298:
297:
281:
269:
268:
266:Low‑importance
254:
242:
241:
235:
224:
210:
209:
200:
198:
197:
194:
193:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1061:
1050:
1047:
1045:
1042:
1040:
1037:
1035:
1032:
1030:
1027:
1025:
1022:
1020:
1017:
1015:
1012:
1010:
1007:
1005:
1002:
1000:
997:
995:
992:
990:
987:
985:
982:
980:
977:
975:
972:
971:
969:
962:
949:
945:
941:
937:
933:
929:
924:
919:
915:
914:
913:
912:
911:
910:
909:
908:
907:
906:
897:
893:
889:
884:
883:
882:
881:
880:
879:
878:
877:
870:
866:
862:
858:
854:
853:
852:
851:
850:
849:
844:
840:
836:
832:
831:
830:
829:
823:
819:
815:
811:
807:
802:
798:
797:
796:
795:
789:
785:
780:
779:
778:
777:
774:
770:
766:
762:
758:
755:
754:
753:
752:
748:
744:
740:
738:
732:
730:
726:
722:
719:
715:
713:
705:
690:
686:
680:
677:
676:
673:
656:
652:
648:
644:
643:
635:
624:
622:
619:
615:
614:
610:
604:
601:
598:
594:
581:
577:
571:
568:
567:
564:
547:
543:
539:
538:
533:
530:
527:
523:
522:
518:
512:
509:
506:
502:
490:
473:
469:
465:
461:
457:
453:
452:
447:
444:
440:
439:
435:
432:
429:
426:
422:
409:
408:
400:
389:
382:
378:
377:
373:
369:
363:
360:
359:
356:
343:United States
337:
334:
332:
329:
327:
324:
322:
321:
317:
315:
312:
311:
308:
304:
303:
295:
284:
282:
279:
275:
274:
270:
263:
258:
257:United States
255:
252:
248:
243:
239:
233:
225:
221:
216:
215:
196:
195:
192:
189:
187:
183:
182:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
960:
857:User:ElKevbo
821:
813:
804:
801:WP:IMPARTIAL
787:
783:
741:
733:
716:
709:
684:
640:
575:
542:project page
535:
531:
460:universities
449:
405:
367:
331:Project Talk
319:
300:
238:WikiProjects
184:
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
551:Lutheranism
534:is part of
511:Lutheranism
399:Ohio portal
148:free images
31:not a forum
968:Categories
810:WP:BALANCE
788:well-cited
546:discussion
468:discussion
818:WP:BALASP
739:article.
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
940:WhySoMan
861:WhySoMan
835:WhySoMan
743:WhySoMan
464:colleges
186:Archives
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
888:ElKevbo
765:ElKevbo
687:on the
578:on the
370:on the
228:C-class
154:WP refs
142:scholar
462:, and
336:Alerts
234:scale.
126:Google
936:TRACS
806:tone.
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
944:talk
934:and
892:talk
865:talk
839:talk
769:talk
760:one.
747:talk
727:and
262:Ohio
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
679:Low
570:Mid
362:Low
176:TWL
970::
961:.
946:)
938:.
894:)
867:)
841:)
771:)
749:)
458:,
260::
156:)
54:;
942:(
890:(
863:(
837:(
790:.
782:"
767:(
745:(
691:.
582:.
548:.
410:.
374:.
240::
191:1
188::
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
