Knowledge

Talk:T-symmetry

Source 📝

296: 493:
absolution and separation of concerns which I will not attempt further resolve what I do not know beyond reason and experience; nor would I want to sit in a cage with an otherwise vicious series of chaotic beyond my own control although it seems a rational conclusion one could derive. Theory and practice categorically seems to derive from Heisenberg conjecture, as noted previously. Aparently what appears to often be missing in solutions of absolution is that which is lost and becomes the obvious: 'known/unknown quanity(s)'. Just an experimental theroy. 12:00, 13 October 2011 (CNT)
391: 370: 286: 265: 203: 234: 492:
Strange enough before actually experiencing first hand the nature of the malady which Heisenberg attempted to define as 'absolute uncertain; I simply had no understanding for the reasoning how this could be the case after learning of reversals of symmetry, as sited. There is an abundance of
479:
I've deleted the "unsolved" tag becasue it's not considered an unsolved issue. CPT symmetry has been proven in the context of quantum field theory, and the only case where T asymmetry can appear and does not appear is the QCD theta-term, which is known as
501:
If all the particles (quarks) spin backwards, could we technically age backwards i.e - could a 70 year old deage to a 20 year old if suddenly all the quarks started reversing because of the T-symmetry principle?
153: 470:
Second question: Shouldn't the similarity transforms in the section on anti-unitarity really be like TxT^-1, instead of TxT? For P it doesn't matter, of course, but if T^2=-1 is does make a difference.
465:
The section on the electric dipole moment is difficult to understand. Why does the permanent electric dipole moment have to be proportional to the expectation value of the current, <Psi|J|Psi: -->
503: 466:? Or is J really the total angular momentum operator (not that it would make the dipole argument easier to understand)? Perhaps J should be defined again in the section on anti-untiarity. 557: 194: 147: 352: 79: 552: 342: 295: 567: 441: 431: 85: 524: 507: 318: 44: 547: 407: 99: 30: 562: 104: 20: 309: 270: 74: 168: 245: 135: 65: 398: 375: 202: 185: 190: 213: 528: 520:
Another important point is - that the time does not flow - what this theory is missing and why it is flawed.
129: 109: 251: 125: 523:
See Page and Wootters (1983) for a start. Or Julian Barbour. The reality consist of set of instants.
233: 161: 55: 406:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
317:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
175: 218: 70: 51: 215: 390: 369: 141: 301: 541: 481: 285: 264: 291: 24: 497:
If all the particles (quarks) spin backwards, could we travel back wards
314: 217: 532: 511: 484:. This is the unsolved problem, not the one mentioned in the tag. 488:
Definitions of "Trace Defined" Asomtopics of CTP-Symetry Theroies
403: 227: 219: 15: 517:
That is a tricky question when thinking about time travel.
160: 402:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 313:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 174: 8: 558:B-Class physics articles of Mid-importance 364: 259: 504:2A00:23C7:1502:6401:C4F1:9027:5B25:5C85 366: 261: 231: 7: 396:This article is within the scope of 307:This article is within the scope of 461:Electric Dipole Moment and Notation 250:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 14: 389: 368: 294: 284: 263: 232: 201: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 553:Mid-importance physics articles 436:This article has been rated as 347:This article has been rated as 1: 410:and see a list of open tasks. 327:Knowledge:WikiProject Physics 321:and see a list of open tasks. 42:Put new text under old text. 568:Low-importance Time articles 533:06:15, 6 December 2023 (UTC) 330:Template:WikiProject Physics 512:10:14, 30 August 2022 (UTC) 50:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 584: 442:project's importance scale 416:Knowledge:WikiProject Time 353:project's importance scale 435: 419:Template:WikiProject Time 384: 346: 279: 258: 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 548:B-Class physics articles 475:"Unsolved" tag deleted 240:This article is rated 75:avoid personal attacks 563:B-Class Time articles 195:Auto-archiving period 100:Neutral point of view 105:No original research 310:WikiProject Physics 246:content assessment 86:dispute resolution 47: 482:strong CP problem 456: 455: 452: 451: 448: 447: 363: 362: 359: 358: 226: 225: 66:Assume good faith 43: 575: 424: 423: 420: 417: 414: 399:WikiProject Time 393: 386: 385: 380: 372: 365: 335: 334: 333:physics articles 331: 328: 325: 304: 299: 298: 288: 281: 280: 275: 267: 260: 243: 237: 236: 228: 220: 206: 205: 196: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 16: 583: 582: 578: 577: 576: 574: 573: 572: 538: 537: 499: 490: 477: 463: 421: 418: 415: 412: 411: 378: 332: 329: 326: 323: 322: 300: 293: 273: 244:on Knowledge's 241: 222: 221: 216: 193: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 581: 579: 571: 570: 565: 560: 555: 550: 540: 539: 536: 535: 525:194.111.119.48 521: 518: 498: 495: 489: 486: 476: 473: 469: 462: 459: 454: 453: 450: 449: 446: 445: 438:Low-importance 434: 428: 427: 425: 408:the discussion 394: 382: 381: 379:Low‑importance 373: 361: 360: 357: 356: 349:Mid-importance 345: 339: 338: 336: 319:the discussion 306: 305: 302:Physics portal 289: 277: 276: 274:Mid‑importance 268: 256: 255: 249: 238: 224: 223: 214: 212: 211: 208: 207: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 580: 569: 566: 564: 561: 559: 556: 554: 551: 549: 546: 545: 543: 534: 530: 526: 522: 519: 516: 515: 514: 513: 509: 505: 496: 494: 487: 485: 483: 474: 472: 467: 460: 458: 443: 439: 433: 430: 429: 426: 422:Time articles 409: 405: 401: 400: 395: 392: 388: 387: 383: 377: 374: 371: 367: 354: 350: 344: 341: 340: 337: 320: 316: 312: 311: 303: 297: 292: 290: 287: 283: 282: 278: 272: 269: 266: 262: 257: 253: 247: 239: 235: 230: 229: 210: 209: 204: 200: 192: 189: 187: 183: 182: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 500: 491: 478: 468: 464: 457: 437: 397: 348: 308: 252:WikiProjects 198: 184: 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 148:free images 31:not a forum 542:Categories 25:T-symmetry 199:1000 days 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 186:Archives 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 440:on the 351:on the 324:Physics 315:Physics 271:Physics 242:B-class 154:WP refs 142:scholar 248:scale. 126:Google 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 529:talk 508:talk 413:Time 404:Time 376:Time 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 432:Low 343:Mid 176:TWL 544:: 531:) 510:) 197:: 156:) 54:; 527:( 506:( 444:. 355:. 254:: 191:1 188:: 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 58:.

Index

talk page
T-symmetry
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Archives
1


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.