733:
up-to-date articles in
Knowledge (XXG), in general, are. Those who did see the programme until the end will remember seeing comparisons between Knowledge (XXG) and the online version of Encyclopaedia Brittanica. These can be summarised as: Knowledge (XXG)'s strengths: Is better on pop culture and its articles are more up-to-date; it is cheaper. Encyclopaedia Brittanica on-line's strengths: More clarity and less political bias in articles. I very much hope that people who only saw the first part were not left with the impression that Knowledge (XXG) articles are out of date, which they are emphatically not (in the "Discussion" pages by the article on <<Knowledge (XXG): -->
364:
346:
869:'Pop Culture - GOOD Knowledge (XXG) will tell you a lot more about pop culture topics than Britannica Online. Clarity - POOR Many entries are confused and some are almost unreadable Political Bias - POOR Any entry in Knowledge (XXG) that has any possible political angle should be treated carefully. Topicality - GOOD The beauty of Knowledge (XXG) is ... every entry can be constantly updated. Price - BRILLIANT! It's completely free to use
252:
374:
318:
191:
242:
218:
872:...Knowledge (XXG) is far from perfect, and, unlike Britannica, can prove unreliable as a sole source of information. But on this one site you will find more information on more topics in more detail than anywhere else in the world. As long as you use it as a first source, which you then check and double check elsewhere, it is brilliant. So, go on, have a wiki!'
1507:
It looks like they're just dropping the main title and keeping the subtitle, but the fact that there is already another unrelated
Channel 5 programme called "Shop Smart, Save Money" does muddy the waters a bit. I suppose it will depend on whether the new series will be officially designated Series 38
732:
Last night, I saw the "The Gadget Show's" piece on
Knowledge (XXG). I hope that those who had began to watch the programme stayed until the end to see the overall evaluation of Knowledge (XXG). Initially, Jon Bentley said that the article on "The Gadget Show" was out of date. This rather obscured how
566:
If you were requesting to ask for The Gadget Show to be deleted, you could end up asking for 1/10th of
Knowledge (XXG) to be deleted! I think considering the contribution the show has made to getting technology information out to the viewers and the millions of people who watch the show when it is on
560:
Ok...lets get this right. Some guy from Africa checks some articles, and saw Gadget Show, what will it do to him? Will it inform in of some information!? NO. This article lacks data. All I justs see just empty sections and some little information in some sub section. Face it! I don't care if half the
508:
If you were requesting to ask for The Gadget Show to be deleted, you could end up asking for 1/10th of
Knowledge (XXG) to be deleted! I think considering the contribution the show has made to getting technology information out to the viewers and the millions of people who watch the show when it is on
1409:
I am in two minds on this. Whilst the show has changed its name, the lack of the same change across the show's social media and mentions of the show being The Gadget Show's Good Gadget Guide make me suspect it will be a short lived name and either the show will return to the old name and format with
977:
I've noticed someone has added information about the summer special shown as the last show of series four of the show. As this will get outdated, is it required and therefore be deleted, or can it be adjusted so it carries brief information about what The Gadget Show covers in a typical show? I also
824:
To be honest, when I have read it, it does seem like a advertisement for the show and therefore could not be considered
Knowledge (XXG) worthy, and anyway, the information would be out of date in a week. As well as that, there are concerns about the pictures you put on that section with copyright.
589:
But it still depends on a popularity of the show, as explained above, The Gadget Show is one of Five's most successful programmes and a leader in the field of technology programming on
British television. I still disagree strongly with its deletion, but do agree in principle to adding more data to
518:
And I checked
Magicgrafx Entertainment, it isn't a show, but a website, and a website needs to be extremely popular for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG), if I remember (I tried to find the article on Knowledge (XXG) which details the requirements, but it appears to have disappeared off the face of the
904:
conform to the
Knowledge (XXG) Guide to layout, which shows how an article should be laid out, so why do the main article links for the presenters keep getting removed? As far as I can see and the only explaination given, "overkill" cannot be a suitable explaination, I have used the same links on
612:
It might be worth keeping the semi protection on this article on until Sunday 23 April 2006, well after the repeat showing of the Wiki and
Knowledge (XXG) feature on The Gadget Show on Five has aired and so to avoid a repeat of the vandalism that was caused on Monday 17 April when the feature was
845:
My previous reversion of the next episode section was because it was clearly a copyright violation. The text I reverted was a cut and paste from their website, with no attempt to rewrite in our own words. Copyright violations are a big no-no for wikipedia as it could place the project in a dodgy
1428:
This is the third time the programme has changed its title in the past year. Admittedly it's a bit different this time because the actual title is different instead of just adding a new subtitle, but perhaps we should wait and see if the current title is retained for the next series...
865:
I've just watched the show expecting the worst but was pleasantly suprised - although the concept of people changing the pages to see how fast we react should not be encouraged or we'll just end up with lot's more work! Overall comments on Wiki from the shows website are
1240:
Neither, necessarily. If there are sufficient verifiable sources to support season 18, then that may be appropriate, but that doesn't mean that any other season has enough info to warrant one. Each Knowledge (XXG) article is judged on its own merits.
935:
Someone has removed the not verified template for Jeremy Ketchell. I will still dispute the section until someone can verify that Jeremy Ketchell does review gadgets for the shows website, because I can see no such evidence on the website itself.
1123:
The reference which backs up the quote about Jason presenting TopGear GTi is broken because it dosen't exist anymore on the UKTV site. Someone needs to find a new reference, in the meantime I will remove it because it might as well not be there.
1550:
Okay - all online TV guides now seem to be citing it as "Shop Smart, Save Money", series 1, episode 1. Looks like this is officially a replacement for a cancelled series, rather than any kind of re-naming or re-branding of an existing show.
1075:
I've just been redirected here from a link entitled 'FiveFWD'. This seems wrong to me, as although the Gadget Show is part of FiveFWD, that brand also covers the show Fifth gear. I have no idea how to go about editing a redirect though...
1201:
It seems the Channel 5 website is using the original name (as well as the current series name). I suggest the template and other things be moved back to the name "The Gadget Show" with the current series name being included in addition.
1224:
I don't see anything particularly special about this seasons that warrants an article over any other season, so presumably either all seasons should have one, or none of them should. Should we delete season 18, or add 35+ new articles?
846:
legal position. Listing next episodes is also problematic as in a weeks time it will be out of date and need removing. End of the day we are an encyclopedia and not a TV listing page and its rare for future episodes to be listed. See
1002:
I do agree with your viewpoint, maybe a section with a brief description of each section of the show, e.g. main features, The Critical List, How To... guides etc. would be more in keeping with the encyclopedic style for the article.
1491:
With the latest news on the show, once the first show has aired, there may need to be a discussion on the future of this article to decide whether to consider Shop Smart, Save Money as the same show or something different.
573:
Anyway, this Knowledge (XXG) thing is just a joke. It suppose to have usefule information about a subject, educational and community things. Because if this show is to be accepted, then other shows should also be accepted.
875:
which is quite positive. There are lot's of tv shows that have a wiki article. Whether 'wikipedia will should be considered a 'gadget' I'll leave in the air, neverthless the show was good publicity for Knowledge (XXG)
443:
Well... I guess some people watched The Gadget Show's item on Knowledge (XXG), and then ignored its advice to act responsibly. I can't even comprehend the number of edits to find a suitable last version to revert to.
540:
No offence, but have you read what Knowledge (XXG) is all about? There's no reason to delete this article on the basis of the subject matter; as the show itself says, it is Britain's "number one tech show" and one of
153:
1091:
You can edit a redirect by clicking on it, going to the top of the page it redirects to, and clicking on the redirect name where it appears in small text below the title. Here's the redirect page for Five FWD:
327:
228:
925:
I have added a Not Verified template to the section, especially regarding Jeremy Ketchell, whom I can see has no connection with the show. If anyone can prove otherwise, I suggest this should be deleted.
735:, I raised the question of whether Knowledge (XXG) is the world's most up-to-date encyclopaedia. Having seen now that it is even more up-to-date than another online encyclopaedia, I stick to that view).
988:
I tend to agree, I say show content for magazine shows are un-encyclopedic. Reword to give a typical show could be good, if there are any features which run every week then these could be included. --
978:
can't see why we need information on products that the show rated best, it does read like an advertisement to me and in my opinion goes against the Neutral Point of View. What do other people think?
569:
I don't think so! There are thousands of article that have their own section, eg, Maths, English, Science, Music, Games, Cultue, Country ect. How many damn articles have something about a tv show?
963:, not Jeremy Ketchell, and I have edited the article to correct that error. It reinforces the statement I made that Jeremy Ketchell was made up and should be deleted from the article.
1617:
1529:
And, as of today (obviously subject to change), Channel 5's TV guide lists this Friday's show as "The Gadget Show", but also cites it as "Season 1". So that's cleared THAT up, then!
688:
As the repeat showing of The Gadget show has passed, without incident, I have requested the article be unprotected again, as I can no longer see any danger of vandalism to the page.
674:
page had a reference to the gadget show, which made little sense. I've now removed it. If there is some link to the show maybe someone could add an appropriate sentence. --
1175:
The 'Gadget show live' section seems to be written like an advert - especially with the quote "all the year's must-have gadgets". Just thought I'd point it out. Thanks.
147:
1031:
I think the article needs checking through for spelling and grammar, as well as some checks on truthfulness. I've never remembered The Gadget Show on Ftn for example! --
661:
to test out the response of Wikipedian's reaction to vandalism. But If that piece may herald possibly a million or more users, then I think it's a worthwhile vandalism.
1309:
469:
Same here. I have edited it and kept a copy of the page so I can easily revert it back. I also added a next episode chapter. Unfortunatly it is the last in the series!
1622:
1612:
1607:
302:
1221:
Bizarrely, it seems season 18 has its own dedicated article, but none of the others do (out of, currently, at least 36 seasons depending on how you count them).
308:
79:
1167:
When was it created, what has this to do with channel 5? Has the one hour show to do with channel 5 and is it broadcasted in TV? 09:29, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
641:
No, they didn't vandalise that entry, but article was used as an example of the problem of vanity edits. BTW, they showed that EB doesn't have an entry for
455:
1637:
1627:
1250:
396:
274:
85:
1632:
1602:
44:
278:
765:
I also watched the show...but it was aired today! the 11:30 am one, on channel FIVE, and date now is 22/04/2006. So how was it aired on the 17?
479:
Just want to say i love the gadget show and i think the wiki subject was really appealing considering this is my first time here.. so thank you
561:
damn world watches this show, it doesn't stand as an article. Yes, I do also watch this show, but what good information will it give to me?
1436:
1260:
1259:
Currently there appears to be only two citations on that article, neither of which currently link to anything relevant to the Gadget Show.
1226:
1057:
30:
946:
604:
Gadget Show is the best, watch it every week!!! Its funny how the prizes are always their "best ever!!" lol!!! DONT DELETE THIS PAGE!!!!
1294:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
1515:
1391:
1361:
387:
351:
265:
223:
1558:
1536:
1182:
99:
1148:
895:
Why have the main article links been removed from the article? From what I can see, the main article links, as shown, for example:
104:
20:
74:
198:
168:
135:
65:
1482:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
1247:
1285:
109:
129:
847:
1440:
1264:
1230:
1295:
1061:
887:
As Sonic stated, the introduction of this article is in need or a re-write as it reads like an advertisement.
493:
458:
for this article due to the high volume of vandalism that has occured on this article until things calm down.
204:
1519:
1388:
1358:
1562:
1540:
1244:
1186:
1095:
However, I'm not sure where this one should redirect to, as it doesn't actually seem to be mentioned on the
125:
1554:
1532:
1511:
1462:
1432:
1332:
1178:
1144:
1318:
1040:
55:
1381:
1351:
1152:
395:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1458:
1056:
Are we going to change the section with Dallas in, because I think this new guy Ortis is replacing him.
714:
175:
70:
1577:
1125:
993:
855:
679:
632:
1469:
161:
1298:
after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
454:
I agree, reverting the vandalism on this page was a nightmare, and as a response I have requested
1108:
613:
shown for the first time. If things calm down then I will request unprotection for this article.
658:
769:
578:
499:
1497:
1415:
1314:
1207:
1096:
1032:
1013:
1004:
979:
964:
937:
927:
916:
826:
779:
689:
614:
591:
524:
459:
379:
257:
51:
141:
1340:
1081:
1573:
1397:
1367:
1328:
989:
899:
851:
752:
675:
662:
628:
546:
445:
270:
24:
1466:
960:
879:
836:
816:
778:
Today's show (22/04/2006) was a repeat of the Monday (17/04/2006) show shown at 19:15.
748:
654:
470:
363:
345:
1596:
1461:
readers just yet, and instead keep the long-standing title (and almost certainly the
1104:
751:
who presented the piece. Sorry to be a nuisance, just thought I should point it out.
251:
1493:
1411:
1203:
1336:
1077:
671:
646:
624:
273:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can
913:
269:, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Knowledge (XXG) articles about
1100:
392:
373:
369:
247:
492:
Because it is cleary not a subject but a show. Just like the article I made:
736:
642:
542:
707:
Evaluation of Knowledge (XXG) on "The Gadget Show", broadcast April 17 2006
317:
1457:- definitely seems like the show is having an identity crisis. Let's not
906:
520:
1581:
1566:
1544:
1523:
1501:
1472:
1444:
1419:
1402:
1322:
1268:
1254:
1234:
1211:
1190:
1156:
1131:
1112:
1085:
1065:
1045:
1016:
1007:
997:
982:
967:
956:* Jeremy Ketchell Finds how to... convert iTunes files to other formats.
940:
930:
919:
882:
859:
839:
829:
819:
782:
773:
755:
739:
692:
683:
665:
649:
636:
617:
594:
582:
549:
527:
503:
473:
462:
448:
1335:– Channel 5 has changed the name of the show from 9 June 2023 onwards.
623:
It might be worth watching the repeat, apparently they vandalised the
241:
217:
799:
Is there anything wrong with adding a simple Next Episode section?
1141:
The Gadget show is now showing on the UK digital channel 'Dave'
948:
and compared it with the section on the article. This section...
434:
season is not an english word,therefore i have deleted it.-anon
184:
15:
850:
for guidance as to what is considered acceptable content. --
316:
1012:
I changed the section as described in my last edit above.
804:
Obviously. I keep adding it and next time I have a look.
482:
thanks for telling us about wiki.it was very intresting.
197:
This article has not yet been rated on Knowledge (XXG)'s
1508:
or Series 4 - or even Series 1 of a show unto itself.
1093:
160:
391:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1410:the next series or get axed. What do others think?
174:
835:Thanks (by the way it is the last in the series!)
307:This article has not yet received a rating on the
1217:A separate episode guide article for each season?
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
914:Knowledge (XXG) Guide to Layout - Body Sections
277:. To improve this article, please refer to the
1618:Unknown-importance British television articles
973:Show Content Section - Is it really required?
567:should easily make it Knowledge (XXG) worthy.
509:should easily make it Knowledge (XXG) worthy.
8:
590:the article, it does seem a little sparse.
1552:
1530:
1509:
1430:
1284:The following is a closed discussion of a
721:The following discussion has been closed.
710:
600:GADGET SHOW ROCKS AS MUCH AS FREE MONEY!!
340:
212:
190:
188:
1572:I've split it into a separate article.--
342:
214:
1623:British television task force articles
1613:Unassessed British television articles
1608:Unknown-importance television articles
909:article without complaint or removal.
405:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Technology
287:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Television
7:
1303:The result of the move request was:
905:other articles, for example, on the
490:Shouldn't this article be deleted!?
385:This article is within the scope of
263:This article is within the scope of
203:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
14:
519:earth!) a website needs a Google
328:the British television task force
50:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome!
1478:The discussion above is closed.
372:
362:
344:
250:
240:
216:
189:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
1638:WikiProject Technology articles
1628:WikiProject Television articles
408:Template:WikiProject Technology
290:Template:WikiProject Television
1633:Unassessed Technology articles
1603:Unassessed television articles
1567:10:47, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
1545:23:07, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
1524:21:13, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
1502:11:35, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
523:of at least 8 to be included.
1:
1113:17:11, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
959:...was actually presented by
657:created a ficticious page on
399:and see a list of open tasks.
325:This article is supported by
42:Put new text under old text.
1582:08:43, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
1269:10:45, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
1255:16:55, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
1235:16:52, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
1066:18:35, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
1046:22:00, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
848:Knowledge (XXG):Five pillars
627:page as part of the show. --
1343:) 18:09, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
945:I just checked the podcast
1654:
1277:Requested move 9 June 2023
1212:14:08, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
1017:18:53, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
1008:16:37, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
998:23:05, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
983:22:54, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
968:16:30, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
941:15:57, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
931:19:17, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
920:15:37, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
897:
883:11:23, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
860:23:37, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
840:19:33, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
830:18:45, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
820:18:43, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
783:17:33, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
774:17:12, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
756:13:58, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
740:11:01, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
693:12:01, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
684:14:29, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
666:14:03, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
650:12:24, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
637:10:31, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
618:08:27, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
595:18:52, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
583:15:24, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
550:14:01, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
528:07:53, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
504:00:54, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
474:20:13, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
463:19:18, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
449:19:04, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
309:project's importance scale
1473:20:42, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
1445:15:36, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
1420:15:02, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
1403:07:17, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
1372:21:15, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
1191:17:53, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
1157:19:10, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
1132:18:16, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
1119:Broken link to reference!
1103:pages, only on this one.
357:
324:
306:
235:
211:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
1480:Please do not modify it.
1323:08:06, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
1291:Please do not modify it.
1086:00:18, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
724:Please do not modify it.
494:Magicgrafx Entertainment
1171:Written like an advert?
545:'s most watched shows.
1487:Shop Smart, Save Money
388:WikiProject Technology
321:
266:WikiProject Television
75:avoid personal attacks
1333:The Good Gadget Guide
320:
281:for the type of work.
100:Neutral point of view
1163:The Gadget Show Live
105:No original research
1137:Now showing on Dave
411:Technology articles
293:television articles
275:join the discussion
271:television programs
891:Presenter Sections
322:
199:content assessment
86:dispute resolution
47:
1569:
1557:comment added by
1547:
1535:comment added by
1526:
1514:comment added by
1447:
1435:comment added by
1405:
1401:
1385:
1373:
1371:
1355:
1313:
1310:non-admin closure
1181:comment added by
1147:comment added by
1097:Five (TV channel)
1048:(formerly Sonic)
1044:
792:
791:
427:
426:
423:
422:
419:
418:
380:Technology portal
339:
338:
335:
334:
258:Television portal
183:
182:
66:Assume good faith
43:
1645:
1387:
1383:
1374:
1357:
1353:
1344:
1307:
1293:
1193:
1159:
1128:
1071:FiveFWD Redirect
1038:
747:It was actually
726:
711:
413:
412:
409:
406:
403:
382:
377:
376:
366:
359:
358:
348:
341:
295:
294:
291:
288:
285:
279:style guidelines
260:
255:
254:
244:
237:
236:
231:
220:
213:
194:
193:
192:
185:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
1653:
1652:
1648:
1647:
1646:
1644:
1643:
1642:
1593:
1592:
1489:
1484:
1483:
1394:
1364:
1329:The Gadget Show
1289:
1279:
1219:
1199:
1176:
1173:
1165:
1142:
1139:
1127:Chevymontecarlo
1126:
1121:
1073:
1054:
1029:
975:
957:
902:
900:The Gadget Show
893:
885:
797:
722:
709:
610:
488:
456:page protection
432:
410:
407:
404:
401:
400:
378:
371:
292:
289:
286:
283:
282:
256:
249:
226:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
25:The Gadget Show
12:
11:
5:
1651:
1649:
1641:
1640:
1635:
1630:
1625:
1620:
1615:
1610:
1605:
1595:
1594:
1591:
1590:
1589:
1588:
1587:
1586:
1585:
1584:
1488:
1485:
1477:
1476:
1475:
1451:
1450:
1449:
1448:
1437:152.78.210.207
1423:
1422:
1392:
1362:
1326:
1301:
1300:
1286:requested move
1280:
1278:
1275:
1274:
1273:
1272:
1271:
1261:152.78.210.207
1227:152.78.210.207
1218:
1215:
1198:
1195:
1172:
1169:
1164:
1161:
1138:
1135:
1120:
1117:
1116:
1115:
1072:
1069:
1058:81.158.217.123
1053:
1050:
1028:
1025:
1024:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1020:
1019:
974:
971:
961:Jason Bradbury
955:
954:
953:
952:
951:
950:
949:
898:Main article:
892:
889:
878:
863:
862:
834:
815:
814:
812:
811:
809:
808:
806:
805:
803:
802:
801:
800:
796:
793:
790:
789:
788:
787:
786:
785:
764:
763:
761:
760:
759:
758:
749:Jason Bradbury
728:
727:
718:
717:
708:
705:
704:
703:
702:
701:
700:
699:
698:
697:
696:
695:
655:Jason Bradbury
609:
606:
603:
598:
597:
586:
585:
572:
564:
559:
557:
556:
555:
554:
553:
552:
533:
532:
531:
530:
513:
512:
511:
510:
491:
487:
484:
477:
476:
466:
465:
440:
437:
431:
428:
425:
424:
421:
420:
417:
416:
414:
397:the discussion
384:
383:
367:
355:
354:
349:
337:
336:
333:
332:
323:
313:
312:
305:
299:
298:
296:
262:
261:
245:
233:
232:
221:
209:
208:
202:
195:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1650:
1639:
1636:
1634:
1631:
1629:
1626:
1624:
1621:
1619:
1616:
1614:
1611:
1609:
1606:
1604:
1601:
1600:
1598:
1583:
1579:
1575:
1571:
1570:
1568:
1564:
1560:
1556:
1549:
1548:
1546:
1542:
1538:
1534:
1528:
1527:
1525:
1521:
1517:
1516:145.40.140.52
1513:
1506:
1505:
1504:
1503:
1499:
1495:
1486:
1481:
1474:
1471:
1468:
1464:
1463:WP:COMMONNAME
1460:
1456:
1453:
1452:
1446:
1442:
1438:
1434:
1427:
1426:
1425:
1424:
1421:
1417:
1413:
1408:
1407:
1406:
1404:
1399:
1395:
1389:
1386:
1380:
1379:
1369:
1365:
1359:
1356:
1350:
1349:
1342:
1338:
1334:
1330:
1325:
1324:
1320:
1316:
1311:
1306:
1305:No consensus.
1299:
1297:
1292:
1287:
1282:
1281:
1276:
1270:
1266:
1262:
1258:
1257:
1256:
1253:
1252:
1249:
1246:
1239:
1238:
1237:
1236:
1232:
1228:
1222:
1216:
1214:
1213:
1209:
1205:
1196:
1194:
1192:
1188:
1184:
1180:
1170:
1168:
1162:
1160:
1158:
1154:
1150:
1146:
1136:
1134:
1133:
1129:
1118:
1114:
1110:
1106:
1102:
1098:
1094:
1090:
1089:
1088:
1087:
1083:
1079:
1070:
1068:
1067:
1063:
1059:
1052:New Presenter
1051:
1049:
1047:
1042:
1037:
1035:
1026:
1018:
1015:
1011:
1010:
1009:
1006:
1001:
1000:
999:
995:
991:
987:
986:
985:
984:
981:
972:
970:
969:
966:
962:
947:
944:
943:
942:
939:
934:
933:
932:
929:
924:
923:
922:
921:
918:
915:
910:
908:
901:
896:
890:
888:
884:
881:
877:
873:
870:
867:
861:
857:
853:
849:
844:
843:
842:
841:
838:
832:
831:
828:
822:
821:
818:
810:it has gone!
794:
784:
781:
777:
776:
775:
772:
768:
767:
766:
757:
754:
750:
746:
745:
744:
743:
742:
741:
738:
730:
729:
725:
720:
719:
716:
713:
712:
706:
694:
691:
687:
686:
685:
681:
677:
673:
669:
668:
667:
664:
660:
656:
653:
652:
651:
648:
644:
640:
639:
638:
634:
630:
626:
622:
621:
620:
619:
616:
607:
605:
601:
596:
593:
588:
587:
584:
581:
577:
576:
575:
570:
568:
562:
551:
548:
544:
539:
538:
537:
536:
535:
534:
529:
526:
522:
517:
516:
515:
514:
507:
506:
505:
502:
498:
497:
496:
495:
485:
483:
480:
475:
472:
468:
467:
464:
461:
457:
453:
452:
451:
450:
447:
441:
438:
435:
429:
415:
398:
394:
390:
389:
381:
375:
370:
368:
365:
361:
360:
356:
353:
350:
347:
343:
330:
329:
319:
315:
314:
310:
304:
301:
300:
297:
280:
276:
272:
268:
267:
259:
253:
248:
246:
243:
239:
238:
234:
230:
225:
222:
219:
215:
210:
206:
200:
196:
187:
186:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
1559:86.16.42.207
1553:— Preceding
1537:86.16.42.207
1531:— Preceding
1510:— Preceding
1490:
1479:
1454:
1431:— Preceding
1400:me on reply)
1377:
1376:
1370:me on reply)
1347:
1346:
1327:
1315:SilverLocust
1304:
1302:
1290:
1283:
1242:
1223:
1220:
1200:
1197:Article name
1183:82.25.130.75
1177:— Preceding
1174:
1166:
1140:
1122:
1074:
1055:
1033:
1030:
976:
958:
911:
903:
894:
886:
874:
871:
868:
864:
833:
823:
798:
762:
731:
723:
611:
602:
599:
571:
565:
563:
558:
489:
481:
478:
442:
439:
436:
433:
386:
326:
264:
205:WikiProjects
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
1459:WP:ASTONISH
1296:move review
1149:82.33.0.188
1143:—Preceding
813:Any Ideas?
807:***Poof***
795:BIG PROBLEM
715:WP:NOTFORUM
672:Jon Bentley
625:Jimmy Wales
148:free images
31:not a forum
1597:Categories
1574:Darrelljon
1393:STUFF DONE
1378:Relisting.
1363:STUFF DONE
1348:Relisting.
1101:Fifth Gear
990:Salix alba
852:Salix alba
753:Lukelabern
676:Salix alba
663:Lukelabern
659:Jon Bently
629:Salix alba
547:Lukelabern
446:Lukelabern
402:Technology
393:technology
352:Technology
284:Television
224:Television
1467:Netoholic
880:Johnmarkh
837:Jakehall2
817:Jakehall2
643:Brad Pitt
608:Vandalism
471:Jakehall2
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
1555:unsigned
1533:unsigned
1512:unsigned
1433:unsigned
1396:(please
1366:(please
1179:unsigned
1145:unsigned
1105:Robofish
912:Source:
907:ITV Play
771:x<ino
580:x<ino
521:PageRank
501:x<ino
486:Deletion
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
1494:Adamiow
1412:Adamiow
1398:mention
1368:mention
1204:Widefox
1036:retford
1027:Cleanup
229:British
154:WP refs
142:scholar
1465:). --
1455:Oppose
1337:HTS126
1078:GGdown
647:mervyn
430:season
201:scale.
126:Google
1014:Sonic
1005:Sonic
980:Sonic
965:Sonic
938:Sonic
928:Sonic
917:Sonic
827:Sonic
780:Sonic
770:: -->
734:: -->
690:Sonic
645:!! --
615:Sonic
592:Sonic
579:: -->
525:Sonic
500:: -->
460:Sonic
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
1578:talk
1563:talk
1541:talk
1520:talk
1498:talk
1441:talk
1416:talk
1384:LYDE
1354:LYDE
1341:talk
1319:talk
1265:talk
1231:talk
1208:talk
1187:talk
1153:talk
1109:talk
1082:talk
1062:talk
1041:talk
1034:tghe
994:talk
856:talk
737:ACEO
680:talk
670:The
633:talk
543:five
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
1099:or
303:???
176:TWL
1599::
1580:)
1565:)
1543:)
1522:)
1500:)
1443:)
1418:)
1375:—
1345:—
1331:→
1321:)
1288:.
1267:)
1233:)
1210:)
1189:)
1155:)
1130:.
1111:)
1084:)
1064:)
996:)
858:)
682:)
635:)
227::
156:)
54:;
1576:(
1561:(
1539:(
1518:(
1496:(
1470:@
1439:(
1414:(
1390:/
1382:C
1360:/
1352:C
1339:(
1317:(
1312:)
1308:(
1263:(
1251:W
1248:P
1245:T
1243:~
1229:(
1206:(
1185:(
1151:(
1107:(
1080:(
1060:(
1043:)
1039:(
992:(
854:(
678:(
631:(
331:.
311:.
207::
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
