510:
489:
1018:
990:
1394:
did--that it has a perfectly standard structure consisting of verses, a bridge, and a short instrumental section substituting for a repeat of the bridge. I suppose one could argue that the verse itself has slightly irregular qualities (which might be what this critic was referring to). But "irregular" isn't the same as "unusual" or "exceptional." As you indicate, the song is nothing compared to the experimentation that characterized much of the later
Beatles catalog.
1028:
1515:
entries to be short, and they add a
References section that gives the full details. When I edit an article, I try to follow whichever method is already used on the page. In this article, both methods are used, which makes it hard to decide how to add new citations. In addition, the formatting is pretty sloppy. Rather than complain here, I'd prefer to just fix it, but the article has been getting a fair bit of attention lately and I don't want to step on any toes.
302:
780:
243:
458:
811:
335:
628:
906:
885:
566:
413:
219:
1090:
1004:
2316:
916:
602:
1565:
is the Badman diary for 1975. If you actually go read that chapter, it says that McCartney performed the song on his 75/76 World Tour, but it says nothing about the being "performed on piano in a sparse and effective arrangement using a horn section." So--that statement is unsupported unless someone has a different source.
2427:- You helped with figuring out what sources were okay and what should be marked as notes for future improvement. There's a lot of overlap between this one and the last one in sources, so that makes things easier. Again, the idea is to see how this article can be improved, not to go around stripping stars.
2047:
Is there a reason why John's bass playing was allegedly so bad as Ian MacDonald describes? I know that Paul believes that
Spector should have just edited out the relevant mistakes and rerecord them, a technique supposedly used elsewhere on that album, but is there any proof to verify the claim of how
1564:
The diary entries don't always support the assertions for which they are cited. For example, the article says "On the 1976 Wings Over the World Tour, where it was one of the few
Beatles songs played, it was performed on piano in a sparse and effective arrangement using a horn section", and the source
1556:
One of the statements supported by the Cross web site (defunct) are not covered by the Cross book as far as I can tell. Evidently, the content of the book does not match the web site exactly, or some prior editor's interpretation of the Cross text doesn't match mine. In any case, I left that citation
1236:
To quote: "McCartney claimed that his longstanding dissatisfaction with the released version of "The Long and
Winding Road" (and the entire Let It Be album) was the catalyst for his decision." But isn't a catalyst something that speeds a process up? How can longstanding dissatisfaction, thirty years
1872:
Why does a 2002 cover version of this song by the relatively unknown "Will Young" receive such prominent treatment in this article? Just below the impressively detailed entry for the mysterious Mr. Young is a long but much less prominently-featured list of musical artists who have covered the song,
1560:
The Badman and Miles "Diary" sources/cites are a little confusing. They include published book elements (ISBN, etc.), but the cites are to online versions. Meanwhile, there are full "Notes" entries for both, and a "References" entry that seems to be for the Miles version, but has a different year, a
2141:
I've just tidied up the article a little, and removed some unsourced trivia. The article doesn't appear to me as either FA or GA quality in terms of coverage, prose, and MoS requirements - it was promoted in 2006, and reviewed again in 2008, and hasn't been well maintained. I will not have the time
2471:
highlighted this as a problem FA at the
Beatles project page, years ago, from memory. I did some work since then, trying to improve it, but it doesn't surprise me to hear there may still be a few problem areas. (Btw, when you mention the Something song article, that is all sorted now, not ongoing?
1260:
commercial a few months ago ("few" is used loosely, as I don't know exactly when it was). It was the commercial where there were a whole bunch of kids (separately) telling about their various experiences with OnStar and how it saved their family members, etc. Can anyone confirm or deny this? Does
2048:
it would've been a simple errand of having Paul overdub a new bassline to replace John's original? I don't know if Paul intended to replace John's bass part with his own or not if the wrong notes were played on purpose to "sabotage the song" as MacDonald claims, but let's face it: it's not like
1514:
The citations in this article are a bit of a mess. I prefer a single "Notes" section where the first reference to a book (for example) lists the complete information and subsequent references (perhaps to different pages in the book) use a shorter entry. Other people evidently like all the Notes
1408:
I'd be curious to know the exact scoring of the orchestra. I'm surprised to see no mention of a French horn, as several times it really sounds like that to me. The notes are far too high for a trombone, and too mellow (to my ears) for a trumpet. Perhaps a trumpet using a loose plunger or hat or
1393:
I may not be as musically knowledgeable as you, but I had much the same reaction. I've always been intrigued by unusual song structures (I wrote a recent blog entry on the topic), and when I read those words in the article, I stopped short. I had to listen to the song again, and I found--as you
1951:
I agree, I think the confusion comes from the film where the vision shows Billy
Preston playing a Hammond organ in the solo, however he doesn't appear to be playing the actual notes you hear in the audio, and further the audio is the sound of an electric piano not the Hammond like you said. It
1379:
The rest of the "Let It Be" album is heavily influence by the
Beatles early rock influences, so in the context of the album, it sounds sophisticated, but compared to the songwriting on Abbey Road, the White Album, - anything post-LSD, to be blunt - it is a simple, straightforward song. No key
1534:
You're right about the references being sloppy. You should go ahead and change them as you think fit, John. I must say it's refreshing to talk about references and the quality of them, and to have (hopefully) passed the POV, vandalism, unreferenced and supposition remarks phase in an article.
1375:
The "sophisticated chord changes" are purely diatonic, with a couple of dominant seventh chords and a single altered bass (Ab chord over Bb bass), in one key. The only "relative minor" in the song is the first phrase of each verse, which is sung over a minor chord. Only in the most strict
801:
1757:
Per FA criteria, a citation is needed at his point - a FA should never have a 'needs citation' tag, and it is legitimate grounds for removal IMO. My suggestion is to quickly remedy or remove the bit entirely, as this article has been put under review before. I'd hate to see an article get
1167:
This is a very good article, and I also see nothing wrong with articles on important and well-known songs, but this article, in my opinion, goes well beyond the scope of the song "The Long and
Winding Road". Perhaps the information not directly related to the song could go on a separate
1368:
The song takes the form of a piano-based ballad, with an unconventional structure and some of the most inventive and sophisticated chord changes heard in The
Beatles' catalogue. The song's home key is in E-flat major but spends ample time in its relative minor, the key of C minor.
1318:
All attempts to do a Print Preview of this article's page (NOT this discussion page) on Mozilla at a display ratio other than "Shrink to Fit" cause Mozilla to crash. I don't know enough about HTML and web-design to know how to fix this. Perhaps someone else could fix what is
2550:, but I think there are a couple of points unsourced – in that the reference never actually supported all the text that precedes it. I noticed one or two examples; perhaps I'll get back on it, although I can't say the song's one that interests me a great deal
1290:. Performances and transcriptions of lyrics are protected by copyright. Unless the owner of the copyright has placed the material on the web themselves, or approved its publication on some unofficial website, it should not be linked from Knowledge (XXG). --
2572:
Okay. I'll mark this as one with notes and pointing to this discussion then. It doesn't have to be perfect, and this one is very far from the worst, so I don't anticipate this one seeing FAR anytime in the near future. There's some rather iffy ones at
1927:
going to change the band lineup to this but this is my understanding of it: Paul McCartney-lead vocals, piano: John Lennon-Fender Bass VI: George Harrison-lead guitar: Ringo Starr-drums: Billy Preston-organ (???) and electric piano. In the article for
2479:
Looking at those sources, they should be easy to replace, as you say. (Some of them should never have been used here, imo, given the wealth of literature and other coverage on the Beatles.) The only one I wouldn't necessarily have a problem with is
2168:
Who changed the band lineup to "Billy Preston on organ?" Preston clearly plays electric piano in this song and this should be apparent to any keyboardist who listens to the Let It Be...Naked version, so I edited that accordingly. Consistent with
1873:
among them such established and illustrious performers as Aretha Franklin, Diana Ross, Johnny Mathis, Cher, Kiri Te Kanawa and Barry Manilow. It seems to me that Mr. Young should be somewhere in this list. Perhaps towards the bottom.
1197:
article. I've also made some general structure and wording changes and copy edits and added some material from a primary source (Lewishon's book). There are still some awkward bits (ie. the explanation of the difference between the
1895:
Probably because Young's version "reached the top of the UK Singles Chart where it stayed for two consecutive weeks". If there is anyone else who released a cover as a notable single, we could expand the article for them as well.
1503:. I think Cross took the website down when he decided to publish the book that is also referenced in this article and contains all the material that used to be on his site. I have the book, and I will fix the refs today or soon.
396:
153:
2486:. That links to Andrew Morton's page, of course, but it's not as if he writes the music content on that arts/entertainment website. Perhaps others know more than I do about this; from my very limited involvement with
1003:
2624:
1186:
I've done an edit with R.'s comments in mind; specifically I've tried to limit the material to the song, with just enough framing info for context. Much of what I cut out would be a valuable addition to the
377:
316:
2191:
Billy Preston is seen playing organ in the movie. However he doesn't appear to be playing the actual notes you hear in the audio, and furthermore, the audio is the sound of an electric piano, not an organ.--
2019:
may have removed John Lennon's bassline and replaced it with his own. My only other thought is that the mistakes may have been fixed by studio technicians. I would like for other users to tell me what they
2510:, so I'm not sure how useful I will be with working on music FAs. And yes, the Something song discussion is completely resolved, and it has been marked as satisfactory at the old featured articles study.
1383:
Perhaps I'm not sufficiently bowing down to Pollack's authority, but his article in general reminds me of A.J. Weberman's obsessive projection into Dylan's music, more so than mainstream musical analysis.
1584:
andreasegde, re: comments above about it being "refreshing to talk about references ...", I completely agree. I appreciate what you've done to clean up the article and I wish I had made that point above.
1345:
The version on Anthology 3 is the same take which received Spector's overdubs, whereas the Let It Be Naked version is a different take, previously unreleased. This information is correctly stated on the
2619:
2460:
There's a couple citation needed tags, but nothing too serious. Overall, this looks like it shouldn't be too hard to fix if we can figure out what sources are okay and what would need replacement.
1518:
Anyway, for the short-term, I'll volunteer to fix the Cross website references, converting them to references to his book, but will await further comment by other editors before doing anything else.
1157:
I don't see a problem with well-done articles on particular, notable songs; care needs to be taken not to repeat too much of the information already present in the album or artist listing, though.
1753:
Remarkably, a quite strong auto-tune effect has been applied to McCartney's voice, which makes the whole song sound somewhat synthetically, as it lacks the typical, imperfect McCartney vocal part.
1916:
I have "Let it Be...Naked" and I didn't hear a Hammond organ in the song-I heard a Fender Rhodes electric piano. I assume that it was Billy Preston. I know the sounds of both the Hammond B-3
1045:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1080:
2654:
2609:
341:
2699:
1730:
The sidebar listed "For You Blue" as the A-side, while the text of the article lists it as the B-side. I'm certain that the latter is correct, and changed the sidebar accordingly.
1070:
147:
2237:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. This message was posted before February 2018.
651:
2704:
1046:
525:
and related topics on Knowledge (XXG). Users who are willing to participate in the project should visit the project page, where they can join and see a list of open tasks.
2142:
to tidy up the article or take my concerns further, however it seems appropriate to raise those concerns rather than merely pass on by, so, per the stage one process at
44:
2256:
2252:
2238:
2694:
2504:
I forgot to sign, apparently, so that's the issue with the pings not going through. Thanks for taking a look at this. My only music contribution is the low-quality
1451:
Would somebody like to clarify this asap? I tried a quick google but I'm apparently incompitent (hence the mispelling of both incompetent and misspelling). Cheers,
743:
556:
1380:
changes, no altered notes, no "jazz" chords, nothing special except Paul McCartney's ability to deploy such simple materials in an elegant, appropriate fashion.
1041:
995:
972:
2634:
546:
1652:
1642:
867:
79:
1364:
The following quote - and the article it is quoted from - is a prime reason why "quoting authorities" is simply not good enough to create a viable reference.
2684:
962:
2669:
1286:
I have again removed external links from this article to material in violation of copyright, per #5 under the "Links to be used occasionally" section at
857:
2011:
didn't do too bad. I believe this is the same version as heard in the film. I also discussed this in the "Let It Be...Naked talk page. I don't know why
2411:, there's an ongoing thing going on to doublecheck old FAs. The idea is to see where improvements can be made to these articles, and to ideally avoid
2659:
1607:", meaning that maybe you didn't do it in the past, but you will certainly do it in the future, which is a very nice compliment, and very positive. --
1496:
2689:
2649:
190:
938:
85:
2506:
2614:
833:
2629:
2447:
Not sure that musicoutfitters.com is the best source for chart positions (my browser also says it has iffy security and won't let me access it)
2350:
The genre is listened as Rock, but I don’t see it that way. Wouldn’t this song be considered more of a soft rock or pop ballad than just Rock?
1932:" Preston is credited as having played electric piano and not as having played organ. But I guess what I just said before would be considered
1669:
2679:
742:
to the talk pages of all Beatles-related articles. Send a newsletter to members, canvas for new members and coordinate tasks. Enter articles
1789:
1569:
So far, the more I look, the more issues I find. They're mostly minor stuff, but fixing some of them may result in article content changes.
2664:
1326:
30:
2143:
674:
659:
517:
494:
2644:
2192:
2178:
1880:
1853:
168:
929:
890:
425:
1135:
647:
135:
824:
785:
99:
2057:
1552:(outdent)OK, part two. I cleaned up some of the citations, mostly Craig Cross stuff but others, too. There are still some problems:
1933:
104:
20:
737:
1256:
This is kinda old, so it'll be a bit hard to verify, but I believe that an instrumental version was the background music for an
74:
2639:
1986:
1964:
689:
435:
431:
640:
469:
2389:
1304:
some of the citations are suffering from link rot, being new to wikia I did not continue further <notably reference 8: -->
1105:
or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the
2015:
described Lennon's bass playing as "atrocious to the point of sabotage." I guess it's possible that in the "Naked" version,
574:
311:
65:
129:
2473:
1150:
There are a bunch of articles about Beatles songs...they should probably go on their respective albums' articles though.
757:
2299:
1033:
2450:
Tropicalglen.com is not going to be the best source for Cash Box chart positions, are those available online elsewhere?
2437:
Graham Calkin clearly produces a lot of output on the Beatles, but are his self-published works widely cited by others?
1172:
page? I'm sure a lot of other information could be added to such a page. Or else make a clear "Breakup" section in the
284:
2674:
706:
280:
125:
334:
1982:
1960:
1376:
interpretation of a small part of the classical music tradition does a single minor chord define a minor tonality.
185:
1830:
1774:
1098:
756:
This article does not yet have a related to do list. If you can think of any ways to improve the article, why not
714:
109:
2373:, though for anything to be listed as a genre, besides the band's standard genre, it would need to be sourced. ―
2211:
1222:
175:
24:
2320:
2255:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1372:
To put it crudely, it's wack BS. The "unconventional structure" is Verse/Verse/Bridge/Verse/Repeat last verse.
199:
2408:
457:
301:
225:
2227:
1330:
475:
321:
2196:
2182:
1884:
1857:
2290:
2219:
1823:
1767:
1696:
1590:
1574:
1525:
1139:
612:
1876:
1849:
1803:
1322:
1210:
1131:
1194:
1173:
1169:
2525:
288:
55:
2274:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
2262:
2061:
1612:
1540:
1485:
1471:
1385:
1305:
937:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
832:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
665:
229:
2218:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
1347:
141:
70:
412:
2065:
2029:
1901:
1735:
1715:
1683:
Assertions in the article are cited to Cross, and Cross attributes comments to balance engineer Pete
325:
2351:
1271:
720:
509:
488:
161:
2123:
2021:
1937:
1452:
1410:
1351:
2582:
2537:
2515:
2383:
2355:
2155:
1816:
1760:
1692:
1586:
1570:
1521:
1395:
204:
2558:. As mentioned, this article was flagged on the project page as a problem FA, years ago, so ...
2259:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
2052:
was asked to play bass during the Apple sessions - he couldn't play bass at all, let alone with
696:
2275:
1952:
appears in the movie that they spliced in vision of him playing the organ from some other song.
1413:
refers to a 36 piece orchestra plus vocalists, whereas our article makes it 34: 18+4+4+3+3+2 .
2482:
2336:
2328:
2174:
2127:
2099:
2039:
2025:
2004:
1978:
1974:
1941:
1920:
the Fender Rhodes. He must have been playing the organ very softly because I didn't hear it.
1797:
1414:
1189:
1017:
989:
921:
51:
1638:
1102:
682:
1608:
1536:
1481:
1467:
1151:
816:
608:
242:
201:
2574:
2412:
2282:
1634:
2095:
2053:
1897:
1731:
1711:
1665:
1238:
251:
1287:
594:
2444:
is that it is a sub-optimal tabloid-type source, but others may have differing opinoins.
2122:
added the strings, brass and choir, McCartney regarded the song as having been ruined.--
1645:
linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
2563:
2495:
2241:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
2091:
2076:
2035:
Note that the "Naked" version is not the one used by Phil Spector for his overdubbing.
2016:
1973:
I've edited the article to reflect that it is actually electric piano, consistent with
1265:
810:
800:
779:
627:
2586:
2567:
2541:
2519:
2499:
2396:
2359:
2340:
2304:
2281:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
2248:
2200:
2186:
2158:
2131:
2041:
1990:
1968:
1945:
1905:
1888:
1861:
1838:
1807:
1782:
1739:
1719:
1700:
1691:. Does someone have another source for the comments so we can cite the proper name? —
1673:
1616:
1594:
1578:
1544:
1529:
1489:
1475:
1455:
1417:
1398:
1388:
1354:
1334:
1308:
1294:
1276:
1226:
1143:
2603:
2578:
2547:
2533:
2511:
2468:
2418:
2375:
2148:
2115:
2111:
2012:
1630:
1291:
1218:
1177:
669:
577:, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to songs on Knowledge (XXG).
203:
1641:
when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an
1128:
Suggest including this on the Beatles page or on a Beatles miscleaneous topics page.
2464:
Didn't get the ping (so perhaps neither will Koncorde) but I watch the page anyway.
2332:
2324:
2119:
2036:
1793:
905:
884:
565:
2103:
2087:
2049:
2008:
616:
522:
1599:
There is an old English saying about "I wish I had...". The reply is, "But you
2366:
2247:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
1956:
1245:
1089:
1023:
934:
911:
806:
1788:
Yes, the opinion presented in the text is both unattributed and uncited, and
1244:
What were the other five reasons he cited in court to break up the Beatles? -
2559:
2529:
2491:
2422:
2370:
2170:
1929:
1749:
I've noticed a 'citation needed' tag is present on this page, at this line:
829:
419:
2228:
https://web.archive.org/web/20160305064644/http://www.austchartbook.com.au/
279:) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
2490:
as a source for Knowledge (XXG), the pieces are always written by others.
2434:
Is John Whelan going to be considered an expert for his Beatles timeline?
2107:
2080:
1214:
1158:
828:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to
1447:
and final number one single in America, according to Billboard magazine
746:
onto this list, also list articles needing cleanup and other work here.
2524:
This looks okay for FA to me. I'll be marking it as satisfactory at
1561:
different title, etc. I think the References entry should be removed.
1500:
1257:
2210:
Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified one external link on
1637:, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the
2231:
2083:
1557:
in place. It's the only one that remains as a link to Cross' site.
1409:
something? Can't find much on the web, which doesn't prove much.
1499:. While doing so, I noticed that there were a few references to
1658:
That this article is linked to from the image description page.
1435:
and last number-one song in the United States on June 13, 1970.
609:
A list of articles needing cleanup associated with this project
2374:
451:
237:
213:
205:
15:
1655:
on the image's description page for the use in this article.
1088:
600:
564:
1687:. That's probably a mistake; the balance engineer was Pete
521:, which focuses on improving coverage of English rock band
418:
Facts from this article were featured on Knowledge (XXG)'s
2625:
Featured articles that have appeared on the main page once
2222:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
2146:
I am making a note here, and will ping relevant Projects.
1758:
downgraded, but it may be justified if this is not fixed.
668:, notable radio series which has spawned many bootlegs.
340:
This article appeared on Knowledge (XXG)'s Main Page as
2215:
1176:
article, and transfer some of this information there? -
389:
370:
1466:
This article needs a good clean with a stiff brush. --
160:
2620:
Featured articles that have appeared on the main page
2577:
right now, and this one is nowhere near that level.
2381:
1261:
anyone even know what commercial I'm talking about?
933:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
515:
This Beatles-related article is within the scope of
2251:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
174:
1055:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject R&B and Soul Music
2610:Knowledge (XXG) articles that use British English
1846:Also, Auto-tune technology did not exist in 1970.
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
2655:FA-Class Apple Corps and Apple Records articles
2700:Mid-importance R&B and Soul Music articles
2528:, and if you think it's satisfactory as well,
1668:. For assistance on the image use policy, see
1912:Billy Preston on "electric piano" not "organ"
8:
2472:Discussion there has since been archived at
1497:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject The Beatles
324:. Even so, if you can update or improve it,
320:as one of the best articles produced by the
314:; it (or a previous version of it) has been
2705:WikiProject R&B and Soul Music articles
2546:I know the sources are a whole lot better,
1957:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lxjaq1R3AYw
1625:Image copyright problem with Image:WYGG.jpg
1427:In the intro, the article currently reads:
1058:Template:WikiProject R&B and Soul Music
2319:You are invited to join the discussion at
2164:Billy Preston on electric piano, NOT organ
2003:I don't mean to be subjective, but in the
1193:article, I think, or, as R. suggests, the
984:
879:
774:
635:Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
582:
483:
349:
296:
255:, which has its own spelling conventions (
1670:Knowledge (XXG):Media copyright questions
1633:is used in this article under a claim of
1495:I added a missing citation as request on
2695:FA-Class R&B and Soul Music articles
2310:Suitability of reference used in article
455:
2507:David Ashley Parker from Powder Springs
2144:Knowledge (XXG):Featured article review
1999:Criticism of John Lennon's bass playing
986:
881:
776:
531:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject The Beatles
485:
1106:
947:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Rock music
2430:The ones I have questions about are:
1792:was unexplained; so I've removed it.
842:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Pop music
287:, this should not be changed without
232:is to use "the Beatles" mid-sentence.
7:
2635:High-importance The Beatles articles
2075:The session originally consisted of
1039:This article is within the scope of
927:This article is within the scope of
822:This article is within the scope of
573:This article is within the scope of
2532:, I'd invite you to do so as well.
2007:version of this song, I think that
1443:On 13 June, it became The Beatles'
23:for discussing improvements to the
2685:Mid-importance Rock music articles
1042:WikiProject R&B and Soul Music
648:Category:The Beatles concert tours
14:
2670:Mid-importance Pop music articles
2615:Knowledge (XXG) featured articles
2369:. Personally I consider it to be
2214:. Please take a moment to review
50:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome!
2660:WikiProject The Beatles articles
2314:
2232:http://www.austchartbook.com.au/
1360:Authority does not equal quality
1341:Anthology 3 and Let It Be… Naked
1026:
1016:
1002:
988:
914:
904:
883:
809:
799:
778:
626:
534:Template:WikiProject The Beatles
508:
487:
456:
411:
333:
300:
241:
217:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
2690:WikiProject Rock music articles
2650:FA-Class George Martin articles
1664:This is an automated notice by
1480:I have changed a few things. --
1075:This article has been rated as
1061:R&B and Soul Music articles
967:This article has been rated as
950:Template:WikiProject Rock music
862:This article has been rated as
690:Category:The Beatles song stubs
551:This article has been rated as
2403:Questions about source quality
1839:20:11, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
1808:04:46, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
1783:01:11, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
1288:Knowledge (XXG):External links
1227:01:44, 21 September 2004 (UTC)
1206:charts) that could use fixing.
845:Template:WikiProject Pop music
646:Articles on each Beatle tour (
474:It is of interest to multiple
1:
2630:FA-Class The Beatles articles
2587:16:15, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
2568:09:02, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
2542:06:34, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
2474:Talk:Something (Beatles song)
2397:07:42, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
2175:Let It Be...Naked#Differences
2137:Concerns regarding FA quality
2066:01:37, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
1975:Let It Be...Naked#differences
1701:04:52, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
1617:19:41, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
1595:13:43, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
1579:18:42, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
1545:13:14, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
1530:16:52, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
1490:18:08, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
1476:17:54, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
1389:09:28, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
1355:04:13, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
1335:21:48, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
1309:20:38, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
1049:and see a list of open tasks.
1034:R&B and Soul Music portal
941:and see a list of open tasks.
836:and see a list of open tasks.
42:Put new text under old text.
2680:FA-Class Rock music articles
2520:16:11, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
2500:05:52, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
2331:) 18:21, 17 May 2019 (UTC) —
2201:23:30, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
2187:23:22, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
2030:20:29, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
1998:
1906:15:52, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
1889:01:23, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
1862:01:38, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
1674:09:29, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
1639:requirements for such images
1501:Craig Cross' defunct website
1399:10:47, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
2665:FA-Class Pop music articles
2159:16:12, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
1979:Let It Be (album)#Personnel
1790:the edit that introduced it
1314:This page can crash Mozilla
1295:02:20, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
1144:05:50, 6 October 2003 (UTC)
2721:
2645:WikiProject Songs articles
2268:(last update: 5 June 2024)
1969:23:04, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
1946:13:52, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
1248:05:38, Jan 16, 2005 (UTC)
1081:project's importance scale
973:project's importance scale
868:project's importance scale
557:project's importance scale
378:Featured article candidate
2212:The Long and Winding Road
1740:19:12, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
1720:19:14, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
1277:09:25, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
1241:04:07, 16 Jan 2005 (UTC)
1180:16:07, 20 Sep 2004 (UTC)
1096:
1074:
1011:
966:
899:
861:
794:
617:the index of WikiProjects
581:
572:
550:
503:
482:
442:
352:
348:
322:Knowledge (XXG) community
308:The Long and Winding Road
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
25:The Long and Winding Road
2409:Something (Beatles song)
2360:03:21, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
2341:18:21, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
2305:20:38, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
2042:13:58, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
1706:Possibly confusion with
1456:22:55, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
1418:06:04, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
1154:05:53, 6 Oct 2003 (UTC)
342:Today's featured article
2440:My experience with the
2206:External links modified
2132:20:32, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
1991:07:47, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
1814:Alright, very good. :)
1431:It became The Beatles'
1161:15:44, 7 Oct 2003 (UTC)
738:WikiProject The Beatles
611:is available. See also
595:WikiProject The Beatles
518:WikiProject The Beatles
397:Featured article review
2640:FA-Class song articles
2365:I agree that it isn't
2321:WT:BEATLES#Craig Cross
1755:
1653:non-free use rationale
1237:or so, be a catalyst?
1195:History of the Beatles
1174:History of the Beatles
1170:breakup of the Beatles
1097:This article has been
1093:
1052:R&B and Soul Music
996:R&B and Soul Music
930:WikiProject Rock music
605:
569:
464:This article is rated
75:avoid personal attacks
2118:electric piano. When
1983:Woodywoodpeckerthe3rd
1961:Woodywoodpeckerthe3rd
1868:"Will Young version"?
1751:
1439:Then later it reads:
1092:
825:WikiProject Pop music
666:The Lost Lennon Tapes
604:
568:
468:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
100:Neutral point of view
2249:regular verification
703:Pics/Graphics wanted
613:the tool's wiki page
537:The Beatles articles
344:on January 16, 2005.
285:relevant style guide
281:varieties of English
105:No original research
2552:(ie, it feels like
2239:After February 2018
2171:Let It Be#Personnel
1099:automatically rated
953:Rock music articles
283:. According to the
2675:Pop music articles
2293:InternetArchiveBot
2244:InternetArchiveBot
1282:linking to copyvio
1094:
848:Pop music articles
606:
570:
470:content assessment
371:September 22, 2004
353:Article milestones
86:dispute resolution
47:
2557:
2488:The Morton Report
2483:The Morton Report
2455:The Morton Report
2269:
2071:Recording session
2005:Let It Be...Naked
1934:original research
1879:comment added by
1852:comment added by
1325:comment added by
1266:Gordon P. Hemsley
1252:OnStar commercial
1230:
1213:comment added by
1134:comment added by
1121:
1120:
1117:
1116:
1113:
1112:
983:
982:
979:
978:
922:Rock music portal
878:
877:
874:
873:
773:
772:
769:
768:
765:
764:
761:
753:
752:
744:assessed as stubs
575:WikiProject Songs
450:
449:
406:
405:
295:
294:
236:
235:
212:
211:
66:Assume good faith
43:
2712:
2551:
2426:
2407:Sorta like with
2395:
2392:
2386:
2380:
2378:
2318:
2317:
2303:
2294:
2267:
2266:
2245:
2151:
1936:, wouldn't it?--
1891:
1864:
1834:
1827:
1820:
1811:
1778:
1771:
1764:
1745:Citation needed?
1651:That there is a
1423:Conflicting info
1348:Let It Be… Naked
1337:
1275:
1274:
1229:
1207:
1146:
1108:
1063:
1062:
1059:
1056:
1053:
1036:
1031:
1030:
1029:
1020:
1013:
1012:
1007:
1006:
1005:
1000:
992:
985:
955:
954:
951:
948:
945:
924:
919:
918:
917:
908:
901:
900:
895:
887:
880:
850:
849:
846:
843:
840:
819:
817:Pop music portal
814:
813:
803:
796:
795:
790:
782:
775:
755:
741:
675:Adopt an article
652:Missing articles
641:Article requests
630:
623:
622:
603:
583:
539:
538:
535:
532:
529:
512:
505:
504:
499:
491:
484:
467:
461:
460:
452:
445:Featured article
443:Current status:
415:
392:
373:
350:
337:
312:featured article
304:
297:
248:This article is
245:
238:
230:this RfM closure
226:this RfC closure
221:
220:
214:
206:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
2720:
2719:
2715:
2714:
2713:
2711:
2710:
2709:
2600:
2599:
2585:
2540:
2518:
2416:
2405:
2390:
2384:
2376:
2348:
2315:
2312:
2297:
2292:
2260:
2253:have permission
2243:
2220:this simple FaQ
2208:
2166:
2149:
2139:
2096:George Harrison
2073:
2054:The Sex Pistols
2001:
1914:
1874:
1870:
1847:
1832:
1825:
1818:
1801:
1776:
1769:
1762:
1747:
1728:
1681:
1627:
1464:
1425:
1406:
1362:
1343:
1320:
1316:
1302:
1284:
1270:
1262:
1254:
1208:
1129:
1126:
1060:
1057:
1054:
1051:
1050:
1032:
1027:
1025:
1001:
998:
952:
949:
946:
943:
942:
920:
915:
913:
893:
847:
844:
841:
838:
837:
815:
808:
788:
749:
735:
621:
601:
553:High-importance
536:
533:
530:
527:
526:
498:High‑importance
497:
465:
388:
369:
289:broad consensus
252:British English
218:
208:
207:
202:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
2718:
2716:
2708:
2707:
2702:
2697:
2692:
2687:
2682:
2677:
2672:
2667:
2662:
2657:
2652:
2647:
2642:
2637:
2632:
2627:
2622:
2617:
2612:
2602:
2601:
2598:
2597:
2596:
2595:
2594:
2593:
2592:
2591:
2590:
2589:
2581:
2536:
2514:
2477:
2465:
2458:
2457:
2451:
2448:
2445:
2438:
2435:
2404:
2401:
2400:
2399:
2347:
2344:
2311:
2308:
2287:
2286:
2279:
2235:
2234:
2226:Added archive
2207:
2204:
2165:
2162:
2138:
2135:
2092:Fender Bass VI
2077:Paul McCartney
2072:
2069:
2045:
2044:
2017:Paul McCartney
2000:
1997:
1996:
1995:
1994:
1993:
1953:
1913:
1910:
1909:
1908:
1869:
1866:
1844:
1843:
1842:
1841:
1806:comment added
1746:
1743:
1727:
1726:A-Side, B-Side
1724:
1723:
1722:
1680:
1679:Brown vs. Bown
1677:
1662:
1661:
1660:
1659:
1656:
1631:Image:WYGG.jpg
1626:
1623:
1622:
1621:
1620:
1619:
1567:
1566:
1562:
1558:
1550:
1549:
1548:
1547:
1519:
1516:
1512:
1511:
1510:
1463:
1460:
1449:
1448:
1437:
1436:
1424:
1421:
1405:
1402:
1396:marbeh raglaim
1361:
1358:
1342:
1339:
1327:172.191.198.26
1315:
1312:
1301:
1298:
1283:
1280:
1253:
1250:
1234:
1233:
1232:
1231:
1165:
1164:
1163:
1162:
1125:
1122:
1119:
1118:
1115:
1114:
1111:
1110:
1095:
1085:
1084:
1077:Mid-importance
1073:
1067:
1066:
1064:
1047:the discussion
1038:
1037:
1021:
1009:
1008:
999:Mid‑importance
993:
981:
980:
977:
976:
969:Mid-importance
965:
959:
958:
956:
939:the discussion
926:
925:
909:
897:
896:
894:Mid‑importance
888:
876:
875:
872:
871:
864:Mid-importance
860:
854:
853:
851:
834:the discussion
821:
820:
804:
792:
791:
789:Mid‑importance
783:
771:
770:
767:
766:
763:
762:
754:
751:
750:
748:
747:
723:
710:
692:
678:
655:
634:
632:
631:
599:
598:
597:
588:
587:
579:
578:
571:
561:
560:
549:
543:
542:
540:
513:
501:
500:
492:
480:
479:
473:
462:
448:
447:
440:
439:
426:On this day...
416:
408:
407:
404:
403:
400:
393:
390:March 16, 2006
385:
384:
381:
374:
366:
365:
362:
359:
355:
354:
346:
345:
338:
330:
329:
305:
293:
292:
246:
234:
233:
224:Consensus per
222:
210:
209:
200:
198:
197:
194:
193:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2717:
2706:
2703:
2701:
2698:
2696:
2693:
2691:
2688:
2686:
2683:
2681:
2678:
2676:
2673:
2671:
2668:
2666:
2663:
2661:
2658:
2656:
2653:
2651:
2648:
2646:
2643:
2641:
2638:
2636:
2633:
2631:
2628:
2626:
2623:
2621:
2618:
2616:
2613:
2611:
2608:
2607:
2605:
2588:
2584:
2580:
2576:
2571:
2570:
2569:
2565:
2561:
2555:
2549:
2545:
2544:
2543:
2539:
2535:
2531:
2527:
2523:
2522:
2521:
2517:
2513:
2509:
2508:
2503:
2502:
2501:
2497:
2493:
2489:
2485:
2484:
2478:
2475:
2470:
2466:
2463:
2462:
2461:
2456:
2452:
2449:
2446:
2443:
2439:
2436:
2433:
2432:
2431:
2428:
2424:
2420:
2414:
2410:
2402:
2398:
2393:
2387:
2379:
2372:
2368:
2364:
2363:
2362:
2361:
2357:
2353:
2345:
2343:
2342:
2338:
2334:
2330:
2326:
2322:
2309:
2307:
2306:
2301:
2296:
2295:
2284:
2280:
2277:
2273:
2272:
2271:
2264:
2258:
2254:
2250:
2246:
2240:
2233:
2229:
2225:
2224:
2223:
2221:
2217:
2213:
2205:
2203:
2202:
2198:
2194:
2193:73.200.194.72
2189:
2188:
2184:
2180:
2179:73.200.194.72
2176:
2172:
2163:
2161:
2160:
2157:
2156:
2153:
2152:
2145:
2136:
2134:
2133:
2129:
2125:
2121:
2117:
2116:Fender Rhodes
2113:
2112:Billy Preston
2109:
2105:
2101:
2097:
2093:
2089:
2085:
2082:
2078:
2070:
2068:
2067:
2063:
2059:
2055:
2051:
2043:
2040:
2038:
2034:
2033:
2032:
2031:
2027:
2023:
2018:
2014:
2013:Ian MacDonald
2010:
2006:
1992:
1988:
1984:
1980:
1976:
1972:
1971:
1970:
1966:
1962:
1958:
1954:
1950:
1949:
1948:
1947:
1943:
1939:
1935:
1931:
1926:
1921:
1919:
1911:
1907:
1903:
1899:
1894:
1893:
1892:
1890:
1886:
1882:
1881:108.20.52.120
1878:
1867:
1865:
1863:
1859:
1855:
1854:108.20.52.120
1851:
1840:
1837:
1836:
1835:
1829:
1828:
1822:
1821:
1813:
1812:
1809:
1805:
1799:
1795:
1791:
1787:
1786:
1785:
1784:
1781:
1780:
1779:
1773:
1772:
1766:
1765:
1754:
1750:
1744:
1742:
1741:
1737:
1733:
1725:
1721:
1717:
1713:
1709:
1705:
1704:
1703:
1702:
1698:
1694:
1693:John Cardinal
1690:
1686:
1678:
1676:
1675:
1671:
1667:
1657:
1654:
1650:
1649:
1648:
1647:
1646:
1644:
1640:
1636:
1632:
1624:
1618:
1614:
1610:
1606:
1602:
1598:
1597:
1596:
1592:
1588:
1587:John Cardinal
1583:
1582:
1581:
1580:
1576:
1572:
1571:John Cardinal
1563:
1559:
1555:
1554:
1553:
1546:
1542:
1538:
1533:
1532:
1531:
1527:
1523:
1522:John Cardinal
1520:
1517:
1513:
1508:
1505:
1504:
1502:
1498:
1494:
1493:
1492:
1491:
1487:
1483:
1478:
1477:
1473:
1469:
1461:
1459:
1457:
1454:
1446:
1442:
1441:
1440:
1434:
1430:
1429:
1428:
1422:
1420:
1419:
1416:
1412:
1403:
1401:
1400:
1397:
1391:
1390:
1387:
1386:24.17.180.126
1381:
1377:
1373:
1370:
1365:
1359:
1357:
1356:
1353:
1349:
1340:
1338:
1336:
1332:
1328:
1324:
1313:
1311:
1310:
1307:
1306:75.15.195.164
1299:
1297:
1296:
1293:
1289:
1281:
1279:
1278:
1273:
1268:
1267:
1259:
1251:
1249:
1247:
1242:
1240:
1228:
1224:
1220:
1216:
1212:
1205:
1201:
1196:
1192:
1191:
1185:
1184:
1183:
1182:
1181:
1179:
1175:
1171:
1160:
1156:
1155:
1153:
1149:
1148:
1147:
1145:
1141:
1137:
1133:
1123:
1104:
1100:
1091:
1087:
1086:
1082:
1078:
1072:
1069:
1068:
1065:
1048:
1044:
1043:
1035:
1024:
1022:
1019:
1015:
1014:
1010:
997:
994:
991:
987:
974:
970:
964:
961:
960:
957:
940:
936:
932:
931:
923:
912:
910:
907:
903:
902:
898:
892:
889:
886:
882:
869:
865:
859:
856:
855:
852:
835:
831:
827:
826:
818:
812:
807:
805:
802:
798:
797:
793:
787:
784:
781:
777:
759:
745:
739:
733:
730:
728:
724:
722:
719:
717:
716:
711:
708:
704:
701:
699:
698:
693:
691:
687:
685:
684:
679:
677:
676:
671:
670:Apple Records
667:
664:
662:
661:
656:
653:
649:
645:
643:
642:
637:
636:
633:
629:
625:
624:
620:
618:
614:
610:
596:
592:
591:
590:
589:
585:
584:
580:
576:
567:
563:
562:
558:
554:
548:
545:
544:
541:
524:
520:
519:
514:
511:
507:
506:
502:
496:
493:
490:
486:
481:
477:
471:
463:
459:
454:
453:
446:
441:
437:
436:June 13, 2020
433:
432:June 13, 2013
429:
427:
421:
417:
414:
410:
409:
401:
399:
398:
394:
391:
387:
386:
382:
380:
379:
375:
372:
368:
367:
363:
360:
357:
356:
351:
347:
343:
339:
336:
332:
331:
327:
323:
319:
318:
313:
309:
306:
303:
299:
298:
290:
286:
282:
278:
274:
270:
266:
262:
258:
254:
253:
247:
244:
240:
239:
231:
227:
223:
216:
215:
196:
195:
192:
189:
187:
183:
182:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
2553:
2526:WP:URFA/2020
2505:
2487:
2481:
2459:
2454:
2442:Daily Mirror
2441:
2429:
2406:
2349:
2313:
2291:
2288:
2263:source check
2242:
2236:
2209:
2190:
2167:
2154:
2147:
2140:
2120:Phil Spector
2074:
2046:
2002:
1924:
1922:
1917:
1915:
1875:— Preceding
1871:
1845:
1831:
1824:
1817:
1815:
1775:
1768:
1761:
1759:
1756:
1752:
1748:
1729:
1707:
1688:
1684:
1682:
1663:
1628:
1604:
1600:
1568:
1551:
1506:
1479:
1465:
1450:
1444:
1438:
1432:
1426:
1407:
1392:
1382:
1378:
1374:
1371:
1366:
1363:
1344:
1317:
1303:
1285:
1264:
1255:
1243:
1235:
1203:
1199:
1188:
1166:
1136:24.27.65.142
1127:
1076:
1040:
968:
928:
863:
823:
731:
726:
725:
721:Beatle wives
713:
712:
702:
695:
694:
681:
680:
673:
658:
657:
639:
638:
607:
552:
516:
476:WikiProjects
444:
423:
395:
376:
326:please do so
315:
307:
276:
272:
268:
264:
260:
256:
249:
184:
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
2104:Ringo Starr
2088:John Lennon
2058:61.69.217.3
2050:Sid Vicious
2009:John Lennon
1848:—Preceding
1802:—Preceding
1708:Peter Brown
1643:explanation
1609:andreasegde
1537:andreasegde
1482:andreasegde
1468:andreasegde
1321:—Preceding
1209:—Preceding
1152:Adam Bishop
1130:—Preceding
586:To-do list:
528:The Beatles
523:The Beatles
495:The Beatles
250:written in
148:free images
31:not a forum
2604:Categories
2367:Rock Music
2300:Report bug
1959:at 2:22
1898:GoingBatty
1732:PurpleChez
1712:PurpleChez
1666:FairuseBot
1629:The image
1603:John, you
1239:Brendanfox
1109:parameter.
944:Rock music
935:Rock music
891:Rock music
758:create one
672:See also:
430:column on
317:identified
2554:hard work
2467:In fact,
2371:Pop Music
2283:this tool
2276:this tool
1930:Let it Be
1923:Now I am
1445:twentieth
1200:Billboard
1190:Let It Be
839:Pop music
830:pop music
786:Pop music
650:). See:
420:Main Page
261:travelled
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
2579:Hog Farm
2548:Hog Farm
2534:Hog Farm
2512:Hog Farm
2469:SilkTork
2419:Koncorde
2391:contribs
2352:Opollo03
2289:Cheers.—
2150:SilkTork
2081:Bluthner
2020:think.--
1877:unsigned
1850:unsigned
1635:fair use
1462:Cleaning
1323:unsigned
1300:Link rot
1292:Mikeblas
1223:contribs
1211:unsigned
1178:R. fiend
1132:unsigned
1124:Untitled
466:FA-class
383:Promoted
273:artefact
186:Archives
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
2333:Ojorojo
2325:Ojorojo
2216:my edit
2124:Kevjgav
2037:Str1977
2022:Kevjgav
1938:Kevjgav
1826:Nidhiki
1804:undated
1794:Uniplex
1770:Nidhiki
1453:Rothery
1415:Stevage
1404:Scoring
1352:Sonitus
1204:Cashbox
1079:on the
971:on the
866:on the
732:Project
707:Kenwood
555:on the
422:in the
361:Process
277:analyse
269:defence
154:WPÂ refs
142:scholar
2575:WP:FAR
2453:Whats
2413:WP:FAR
2377:C.Syde
2346:Genre?
2100:guitar
1350:page.
1319:wrong.
1258:OnStar
1107:|auto=
734:: Add
715:Verify
697:Update
660:Expand
472:scale.
434:, and
364:Result
265:centre
257:colour
126:Google
2108:drums
2084:piano
1981:.
1685:Brown
1367:: -->
1246:Rwv37
1101:by a
727:Other
688:See:
683:Stubs
310:is a
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
2583:Talk
2564:talk
2560:JG66
2538:Talk
2530:JG66
2516:Talk
2496:talk
2492:JG66
2423:JG66
2421:and
2385:talk
2356:talk
2337:talk
2329:talk
2197:talk
2183:talk
2173:and
2128:talk
2110:and
2062:talk
2026:talk
1987:talk
1977:and
1965:talk
1955:See
1942:talk
1902:talk
1885:talk
1858:talk
1798:talk
1736:talk
1716:talk
1697:talk
1689:Bown
1672:. --
1613:talk
1605:will
1601:will
1591:talk
1575:talk
1541:talk
1526:talk
1486:talk
1472:talk
1433:33rd
1411:This
1331:talk
1219:talk
1202:and
1140:talk
615:and
593:For
547:High
402:Kept
358:Date
228:and
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
2415:.
2323:.
2257:RfC
2230:to
2177:.--
2114:on
2106:on
2098:on
2090:on
2079:on
1925:not
1918:and
1819:Toa
1800:)
1763:Toa
1509:...
1507:BUT
1215:Jgm
1159:Jgm
1103:bot
1071:Mid
963:Mid
858:Mid
176:TWL
2606::
2566:)
2556:!)
2498:)
2476:.)
2388:|
2358:)
2339:)
2270:.
2265:}}
2261:{{
2199:)
2185:)
2130:)
2102:,
2094:,
2086:,
2064:)
2056:.
2028:)
1989:)
1967:)
1944:)
1904:)
1887:)
1860:)
1833:05
1777:05
1738:)
1718:)
1710:.
1699:)
1615:)
1593:)
1577:)
1543:)
1535:--
1528:)
1488:)
1474:)
1458:.
1333:)
1225:)
1221:•
1142:)
740:}}
736:{{
705::
619:.
275:,
271:,
267:,
263:,
259:,
156:)
54:;
2562:(
2494:(
2425::
2417:@
2394:)
2382:(
2354:(
2335:(
2327:(
2302:)
2298:(
2285:.
2278:.
2195:(
2181:(
2126:(
2060:(
2024:(
1985:(
1963:(
1940:(
1928:"
1900:(
1883:(
1856:(
1810:.
1796:(
1734:(
1714:(
1695:(
1611:(
1589:(
1573:(
1539:(
1524:(
1484:(
1470:(
1329:(
1272:✉
1269:→
1263:—
1217:(
1138:(
1083:.
975:.
870:.
760:?
729::
718::
709:.
700::
686::
663::
654:.
644::
559:.
478:.
438:.
428:"
424:"
328:.
291:.
191:1
188::
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.