Knowledge

Talk:The Pennsylvania Society/GA1

Source 📝

368: 239: 345: 331: 300: 214: 200: 186: 155: 141: 276: 249: 431:
This is going to be a lot of work to bring up to a standard that is "broad in its coverage" which is one of the standards of the GA criteria. It's entirely too focused on recent (within the last 6 years) events, and does not give any coverage at all to historical development and events from 1903 to
400:
Are we covering the Society? Or the event? If we're truly covering both together (which makes sense) we need to hear more about significant events in the past. We stop talking about history in 1903, basically, until we reach 2003 and afterwards. This is a big glaring gap in coverage. Surely someone
432:
about 2003. I'm not going to fail the article right now, but I cannot pass it with such a glaring ommission, so I'm putting it on hold. As long as work is being done, I don't have a problem extending the hold past the normal 7 days, but progress does need to be made.
407:
Who is the leadership/etc of the society? Any notable leaders of the society in the past? I see the quote about Fricks and Carnegies and Pews, were they involved in the society in the past? Who else of historical
390:
Is there meant to be two external links sections? Or do you mean for the first one to be a "further reading" section? If it's not meant to be a further reading section, they need to be combined.
66: 401:
important attended. Who were the political appointees made in the past? Was it ever involved in a scandal? As the article stands right now, it's got a severe case of
62: 47: 39: 119: 113: 323: 206: 55: 17: 426:"The tradition for Pennsylvania's political and business retreat dates to 1899.." is awkward, suggest rewording somewhat. 147: 32: 172: 417:
Give a date for the "Gilded Age" as you don't want your readers to have to click away from your article.
402: 453: 440: 103: 90: 448:
Since I've heard nothing in almost two days after my last note here, I'm failing this article.
313: 456: 443: 106: 93: 262: 449: 436: 337: 99: 86: 192: 435:
How is this going? I'm not seeing much work being done here...
74: 43: 8: 322:(images are tagged and non-free images have 98:I'll be reviewing this article shortly. 7: 317:, where possible and appropriate. 275: 248: 24: 366: 343: 329: 298: 274: 271:Fair representation without bias 247: 237: 212: 198: 184: 153: 139: 1: 457:16:11, 16 December 2009 (UTC) 444:16:51, 14 December 2009 (UTC) 18:Talk:The Pennsylvania Society 367: 344: 330: 299: 238: 213: 199: 185: 154: 140: 107:16:30, 5 December 2009 (UTC) 94:16:30, 5 December 2009 (UTC) 477: 129:reasonably well written 336:(appropriate use with 311:It is illustrated by 263:neutral point of view 227:broad in its coverage 324:fair use rationales 295:No edit wars, etc. 168:factually accurate 381:Specific concerns 338:suitable captions 468: 370: 369: 347: 346: 333: 332: 302: 301: 278: 277: 251: 250: 241: 240: 216: 215: 202: 201: 193:reliable sources 188: 187: 157: 156: 143: 142: 79: 70: 51: 476: 475: 471: 470: 469: 467: 466: 465: 260:It follows the 234:(major aspects) 60: 37: 31: 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 474: 472: 464: 463: 462: 461: 460: 459: 429: 428: 427: 421: 420: 419: 411: 410: 409: 405: 395: 394: 393: 392: 378: 377: 376: 375: 374: 373: 354: 353: 352: 351: 350: 309: 308: 307: 306: 305: 285: 284: 283: 282: 281: 258: 257: 256: 255: 254: 223: 222: 221: 220: 219: 191:(citations to 164: 163: 162: 161: 160: 124: 123: 80: 28: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 473: 458: 455: 451: 447: 446: 445: 442: 438: 434: 433: 430: 425: 424: 422: 418: 415: 414: 412: 406: 404: 399: 398: 397: 396: 391: 388: 387: 385: 384: 383: 382: 372: 371: 364: 361: 360: 358: 355: 349: 348: 341: 339: 327: 325: 319: 318: 316: 315: 310: 304: 303: 296: 293: 292: 290: 286: 280: 279: 272: 269: 268: 266: 264: 259: 253: 252: 245: 235: 231: 230: 228: 224: 218: 217: 210: 208: 196: 194: 182: 178: 177: 175: 174: 169: 165: 159: 158: 151: 149: 137: 133: 132: 130: 126: 125: 122:for criteria) 121: 117: 115: 111: 110: 109: 108: 105: 101: 96: 95: 92: 88: 85: 81: 78: 77: 73: 68: 64: 59: 58: 54: 49: 45: 41: 36: 35: 26: 19: 416: 403:WP:Recentism 389: 380: 379: 362: 356: 335: 321: 312: 294: 288: 270: 261: 243: 233: 226: 204: 190: 181:(references) 180: 171: 167: 145: 135: 128: 112: 97: 83: 82: 75: 71: 57:Article talk 56: 52: 33: 30: 44:visual edit 173:verifiable 423:Origins: 386:General: 363:Pass/Fail 244:(focused) 84:Reviewer: 27:GA Review 450:Ealdgyth 437:Ealdgyth 100:Ealdgyth 87:Ealdgyth 357:Overall 136:(prose) 67:history 48:history 34:Article 413:Lead: 314:images 289:stable 287:It is 265:policy 225:It is 166:It is 127:It is 116:review 408:note? 118:(see 76:Watch 16:< 454:Talk 441:Talk 170:and 120:here 104:Talk 91:Talk 63:edit 40:edit 148:MoS 452:- 439:- 365:: 359:: 342:: 334:b 328:: 320:a 297:: 291:. 273:: 267:. 246:: 242:b 236:: 232:a 229:. 211:: 207:OR 203:c 197:: 189:b 183:: 179:a 176:. 152:: 144:b 138:: 134:a 131:. 114:GA 102:- 89:- 65:| 46:| 42:| 340:) 326:) 209:) 205:( 195:) 150:) 146:( 72:· 69:) 61:( 53:· 50:) 38:(

Index

Talk:The Pennsylvania Society
Article
edit
visual edit
history
Article talk
edit
history
Watch
Ealdgyth
Talk
16:30, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
Ealdgyth
Talk
16:30, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
GA
here
MoS
verifiable
reliable sources
OR
neutral point of view
images
fair use rationales
suitable captions
WP:Recentism
Ealdgyth
Talk
16:51, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Ealdgyth

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.