869:
316:
467:
449:
775:
that a something is a production company based seeing their name on a poster or whatever. Because editors insist on using their own original research to identify production companies, the consensus listed above says production companies should be explicitly identified as such by the source. This is to prevent people from saying, "Well, their logo is on the poster" or "Their name is mentioned in passing in this article as having been involved in some capacity".
375:
477:
365:
344:
246:
222:
822:
256:
191:
754:
in this film anyway, as it was previously reported by the trades to be just a Fox/Amblin production. Hopefully, time will bring forth some sources. I'm willing to cooperate as need be, NinjaRobotPirate. Also
Radiation15, whether it's right or wrong, IMDb is never a reliable source to bring up as it is open for anyone to adjust and edit. ~
1020:
What is the relevance of the Wash. Post's activities in regard to the
Pentagon Papers? Might as well do a movie on the LA times activities in regard to the Pentagon Papers. Only the NY Times activities were relevant in regard to the Pentagon Papers. So the reader of Knowledge (XXG) walks away from
753:
If anything, I'll wait until the film nears release to locate some more secondary sources, because right now such information is so sparse that I'm not having any luck finding any that aren't primary sources. Honestly, it's relatively fresh news that DreamWorks, Participant, and the like are involved
774:
Variety
Insight is professionally maintained, fact-checked, and sourced in part directly from the studios themselves. It is probably the most reliable source that we can possibly have for this kind of information. Interpreting primary sources is disallowed; that is what you're doing when you say
749:
s database, what then? Are we to acknowledge one and exclude the other because of a discrepancy in information? I understand
Knowledge (XXG)'s policy of using secondary sources to support content, although primary sources may be used with cautious discretion but without personal interpretation. So
911:
References 8 and 9 don't actually mention Nixon, and only ref 9 mentions Trump - and not in the way suggested here. They state that because the film came together in such a short timeline, it is one of the first releases to "respond to" the Trump presidency. As for alluding to Nixon - the film
750:
stating from that, if we cannot use the trailer or poster to identify the production companies, how come we can base the order of the cast (as it appears in the infobox now) on the same billing block from that trailer? Sounds a bit hypocritical but I digress.
912:
doesn't allude to Nixon, it deals with his presidency directly - and, in a broader sense, you could say that this focus on Nixon *alludes* to Trump -- but that's not what these references are saying. find better sources please, or strike the line.
741:
is not the sole universal metric to hold all reliability sourcing to. Let's say we were to find a secondary source that supported the other production companies and provided a completely different thereby contradicted
153:
938:
The article mentions the that the movie explores the difficulty of making decisions that seem clear 40 years later. Is there any information that could be added about how accurate that part of the movie is?
996:
Doing a search engine test, it looks like the film is more often called a drama than a thriller. For simplicity's sake, I would stick with that. The politics can be defined as an element in the film.
1089:
789:
I know this an old discussion, but I would just like to say that we should seek secondary sources beyond
Variety Insights, since entries are deleted from the page once the film is released.--
507:
325:
232:
524:
1084:
550:
587:
556:
147:
514:
431:
79:
1054:
1094:
1069:
421:
519:
1049:
1074:
397:
85:
1079:
619:
guidelines stipulate that production companies "should be cited to reliable secondary sources that explicitly identify the production companies".
44:
490:
454:
1064:
30:
919:
388:
349:
1059:
502:
274:
99:
687:
104:
20:
640:
where does that source say that
Participant Media is a production company? It just says it's "on their slate", which could mean
498:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
74:
202:
1044:
710:
that goes on by
Knowledge (XXG) editors in identifying them. We don't use trailers, posters, press releases, the IMDb, etc.
981:
tends to refer to movies filled with action and/or physical danger. I think "political drama" would be better description. —
168:
65:
286:
278:
135:
706:, not press releases or the IMDb. They also have to explicitly label the production companies because there is a lot of
282:
269:
227:
954:
644:, including that they're a distributor or invested without being a production company. This is exactly the sort of
1005:
780:
715:
660:
599:
881:
828:
109:
794:
129:
208:
923:
1021:
this article as puzzled as before reading it. Very common experience across the US media/press landscape.
888:
942:
915:
675:
125:
876:
55:
986:
776:
711:
683:
656:
624:
613:
595:
396:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
672:
I know what I'm talking about. You just need to chill out. Check out IMDB. There's your fuckin' source.
70:
679:
620:
482:
175:
591:
190:
790:
315:
161:
853:
699:
466:
448:
1026:
857:
586:
for them. I'm getting incredibly annoyed at having to constantly clean up this article. See
380:
51:
982:
950:
761:
141:
702:
and, in most circumstances, can not be used as as a source on
Knowledge (XXG). We need a
583:
24:
707:
703:
645:
1001:
900:
1038:
495:
1022:
590:
that production companies need to be properly sourced and should not be based on
273:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can
946:
755:
635:
261:
472:
393:
370:
364:
343:
251:
245:
221:
997:
896:
494:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
290:
1030:
1009:
990:
958:
927:
905:
861:
798:
784:
769:
719:
691:
664:
655:
s own database does not list Participant Media as a production company.
628:
603:
977:
The opening describes the film as a "political thriller." The term
969:
This article is linked to "The Papers" in Henry James' article.
816:
184:
15:
594:, such as posters, trailers, and other promotional material.
314:
648:
that the consensus linked above is meant to avoid. Also,
160:
852:
Tony was her nickname, her full name was Antoinette.
849:
Change 'Tony Bradlee' to 'Antoinette "Tony" Bradlee'
1090:
C-Class United States articles of Unknown-importance
392:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
174:
555:This article has not yet received a rating on the
580:please stop adding unsourced production companies
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
289:. To improve this article, please refer to the
737:s database doesn't list it, means it's wrong?
8:
609:Just to reiterate what NRP says above, the
940:
913:
813:Protected edit request on 10 November 2017
673:
443:
338:
285:. To use this banner, please refer to the
216:
1085:Unknown-importance United States articles
535:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject United States
934:How historically accurate is the movie?
445:
340:
218:
188:
406:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Journalism
7:
488:This article is within the scope of
386:This article is within the scope of
267:This article is within the scope of
1055:American cinema task force articles
207:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
1095:WikiProject United States articles
1070:Low-importance Journalism articles
538:Template:WikiProject United States
14:
323:This article is supported by the
50:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome!
1050:C-Class American cinema articles
867:
820:
475:
465:
447:
373:
363:
342:
299:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Film
283:regional and topical task forces
254:
244:
220:
189:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
1075:WikiProject Journalism articles
426:This article has been rated as
409:Template:WikiProject Journalism
1080:C-Class United States articles
1:
928:02:19, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
906:09:54, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
862:03:07, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
785:23:00, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
770:21:05, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
720:20:01, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
692:18:27, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
665:01:42, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
400:and see a list of open tasks.
42:Put new text under old text.
1010:23:00, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
991:22:23, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
799:00:07, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
629:00:30, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
604:23:44, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
1065:C-Class Journalism articles
959:05:02, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
843:to reactivate your request.
831:has been answered. Set the
1111:
764:Want to tell me something?
557:project's importance scale
432:project's importance scale
326:American cinema task force
1060:WikiProject Film articles
1031:01:56, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
582:? We have a source from
554:
491:WikiProject United States
460:
425:
358:
322:
302:Template:WikiProject Film
239:
215:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
496:United States of America
541:United States articles
389:WikiProject Journalism
319:
197:This article is rated
75:avoid personal attacks
1045:C-Class film articles
318:
201:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
100:Neutral point of view
879:for this alteration
574:Production companies
483:United States portal
105:No original research
893:template. — Martin
875:please establish a
698:The IMDb's data is
509:Articles Requested!
412:Journalism articles
275:join the discussion
320:
203:content assessment
86:dispute resolution
47:
961:
945:comment added by
930:
918:comment added by
904:
847:
846:
765:
708:original research
694:
678:comment added by
646:original research
571:
570:
567:
566:
563:
562:
442:
441:
438:
437:
381:Journalism portal
337:
336:
333:
332:
277:and see lists of
183:
182:
66:Assume good faith
43:
1102:
894:
892:
871:
870:
838:
834:
824:
823:
817:
777:NinjaRobotPirate
766:
763:
758:
748:
736:
730:So just because
712:NinjaRobotPirate
657:NinjaRobotPirate
654:
639:
618:
612:
596:NinjaRobotPirate
543:
542:
539:
536:
533:
485:
480:
479:
478:
469:
462:
461:
451:
444:
414:
413:
410:
407:
404:
383:
378:
377:
376:
367:
360:
359:
354:
346:
339:
307:
306:
303:
300:
297:
270:WikiProject Film
264:
259:
258:
257:
248:
241:
240:
235:
224:
217:
200:
194:
193:
185:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
1110:
1109:
1105:
1104:
1103:
1101:
1100:
1099:
1035:
1034:
1018:
975:
967:
936:
886:
868:
836:
832:
821:
815:
762:
756:
746:
734:
704:reliable source
652:
633:
616:
610:
592:primary sources
584:Variety Insight
576:
540:
537:
534:
531:
530:
529:
515:Become a Member
481:
476:
474:
411:
408:
405:
402:
401:
379:
374:
372:
352:
304:
301:
298:
295:
294:
260:
255:
253:
230:
198:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
25:The Post (film)
12:
11:
5:
1108:
1106:
1098:
1097:
1092:
1087:
1082:
1077:
1072:
1067:
1062:
1057:
1052:
1047:
1037:
1036:
1017:
1014:
1013:
1012:
974:
971:
966:
963:
935:
932:
909:
908:
889:edit protected
845:
844:
825:
814:
811:
810:
809:
808:
807:
806:
805:
804:
803:
802:
801:
791:Sunshineisles2
751:
723:
722:
700:user-generated
670:
669:
668:
667:
588:this consensus
575:
572:
569:
568:
565:
564:
561:
560:
553:
547:
546:
544:
528:
527:
522:
517:
512:
505:
503:Template Usage
499:
487:
486:
470:
458:
457:
452:
440:
439:
436:
435:
428:Low-importance
424:
418:
417:
415:
398:the discussion
385:
384:
368:
356:
355:
353:Low‑importance
347:
335:
334:
331:
330:
321:
311:
310:
308:
266:
265:
249:
237:
236:
225:
213:
212:
206:
195:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1107:
1096:
1093:
1091:
1088:
1086:
1083:
1081:
1078:
1076:
1073:
1071:
1068:
1066:
1063:
1061:
1058:
1056:
1053:
1051:
1048:
1046:
1043:
1042:
1040:
1033:
1032:
1028:
1024:
1015:
1011:
1007:
1003:
999:
995:
994:
993:
992:
988:
984:
980:
972:
970:
964:
962:
960:
956:
952:
948:
944:
933:
931:
929:
925:
921:
920:192.214.226.1
917:
907:
902:
898:
890:
884:
883:
878:
874:
866:
865:
864:
863:
859:
855:
850:
842:
839:parameter to
830:
826:
819:
818:
812:
800:
796:
792:
788:
787:
786:
782:
778:
773:
772:
771:
767:
759:
752:
745:
740:
733:
729:
728:
727:
726:
725:
724:
721:
717:
713:
709:
705:
701:
697:
696:
695:
693:
689:
685:
681:
677:
666:
662:
658:
651:
647:
643:
637:
632:
631:
630:
626:
622:
615:
608:
607:
606:
605:
601:
597:
593:
589:
585:
581:
573:
558:
552:
549:
548:
545:
532:United States
526:
523:
521:
518:
516:
513:
511:
510:
506:
504:
501:
500:
497:
493:
492:
484:
473:
471:
468:
464:
463:
459:
456:
455:United States
453:
450:
446:
433:
429:
423:
420:
419:
416:
399:
395:
391:
390:
382:
371:
369:
366:
362:
361:
357:
351:
348:
345:
341:
328:
327:
317:
313:
312:
309:
305:film articles
292:
288:
287:documentation
284:
280:
276:
272:
271:
263:
252:
250:
247:
243:
242:
238:
234:
229:
226:
223:
219:
214:
210:
204:
196:
192:
187:
186:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
1019:
978:
976:
968:
941:— Preceding
937:
914:— Preceding
910:
880:
872:
851:
848:
840:
829:edit request
743:
738:
731:
674:— Preceding
671:
649:
641:
614:Infobox film
579:
578:Will people
577:
520:Project Talk
508:
489:
427:
387:
324:
268:
209:WikiProjects
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
983:MiguelMunoz
680:Radiation15
621:Betty Logan
262:Film portal
148:free images
31:not a forum
1039:Categories
1016:Relevance?
965:Wrong link
885:using the
833:|answered=
403:Journalism
394:journalism
350:Journalism
291:guidelines
279:open tasks
973:Thriller?
877:consensus
873:Not done:
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
979:thriller
955:contribs
943:unsigned
916:unsigned
688:contribs
676:unsigned
642:anything
233:American
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
1023:Rtdrury
1006:contrib
854:Mylorin
744:Variety
739:Variety
732:Variety
650:Variety
430:on the
199:C-class
154:WP refs
142:scholar
947:Mpearl
882:before
757:Jedi94
636:Jedi94
525:Alerts
205:scale.
126:Google
837:|ans=
827:This
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
1027:talk
1002:talk
998:Erik
987:talk
951:talk
924:talk
901:talk
897:MSGJ
858:talk
795:talk
781:talk
716:talk
684:talk
661:talk
625:talk
600:talk
296:Film
281:and
228:Film
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
1008:)
835:or
551:???
422:Low
176:TWL
1041::
1029:)
1004:|
989:)
957:)
953:•
926:)
899:·
891:}}
887:{{
860:)
841:no
797:)
783:)
768:)
718:)
690:)
686:•
663:)
627:)
617:}}
611:{{
602:)
231::
156:)
54:;
1025:(
1000:(
985:(
949:(
922:(
903:)
895:(
856:(
793:(
779:(
760:(
747:'
735:'
714:(
682:(
659:(
653:'
638::
634:@
623:(
598:(
559:.
434:.
329:.
293:.
211::
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
