336:
318:
1671:
1622:
346:
194:
246:
225:
692:
population, so he declared it would be "Tech" by fiat. The reasoning was that TWIT would grow faster without the baggage of a stereotype, plus "tech" fit the original vision better. For similar reasons, it is only referred to as "TWIT" within the netcast and fansites, iTunes album art notwithstanding.
1243:
controversy. Notwithstanding the fact that posting the number was technically illegal, the move was broadly supported by all the TWiT panelists and by TWiT's audience. As far as I know, TWiT did not receive a "cease and desist" letter, nor any significant negative attention from the incident. At any
431:
No, you're right copyrights in USA don't protect titles. But, Leo explained on a TWiT episode that he just agreed to change it although, in hindsight, he could have told them to go and screw themselves. In essence, I suppose he agreed to cease and desist even though he didn't have to because it was
1409:
Is it ok to add info from this article even though it does not mention This Week in Tech specifically? There is lots of information regarding the overall network that This Week in Tech is part of e.g. "His podcasts, which he began doing in 2004, now garner 3 million to 4 million downloads a month."
1376:
There is sometimes a reference made to the elusive episode zero. This was a roundtable discussion following MacWorld 2005 which Leo recorded and sent out through his The
Laporte Report (TLR) feed. It is not listed on the twit.tv site and was not officially the first ROTSS show, but seems to have
691:
You fixed it, but got the facts wrong. Both ...Tech and ...Geek were listener suggestions. Geek was hands-down the popular favorite with listeners and
Twitters alike. Leo felt(or it was pointed out to him; it wasn't clear) that "geek" still has some negative connotations with the general
989:
has been on four episodes (44, 49, 56, and 58), and on two of the last three, I think it's safe to say that she is a "recurring guest" rather than an "occasional contributor." I've changed this, but if anyone is greatly opposed to this, discuss it here. Thanks
949:
I cleaned up the top paragraphs, moving the more detailed information about the show's weekly format to a new section titled 'Format'. Also figured the show should be described a little bit better and on it's own terms - there was a lot of comparing it to
611:
Wow, clever :D. Haven't listened to the 5th podcast but listen to the 1st podcast and go to the 22 minute part. That's pretty much all you really hear about Sarah Norton, and it's nothing related to TWiT or anything remotely related to tech.
432:
still his legal right to use the title. I forgot which episode I heard him mention this. I think it was one in which they were discussing how
Monster Cable keeps trying to sue everybody and their mother for similar reasons.
792:" never appears on the official site. "TWiT" suggests it should be "This Week in Tech" but it doesn't mean it MUST be. I'd say the article should be changed to have "this WEEK in TECH" as the one and only meaning. --
156:
1413:
also "The online broadcasting network that
Laporte owns and runs a short walk from his house in Petaluma is called TWiT.tv, after his company’s flagship show, “This Week in Tech.” " is the only reference from
452:
It seems to me like everything is just clumped together into one article. Should we have headings for things such as "History" (started at MaxExpo), "Show Title" (the contest and all), "Production" (they used
695:
Based on what Leo said, it seems to me that Laport himself came up with "This Week in Tech". A listener suggested "This Week in Geek", and he changed it to "This Week in Tech" himself. --
1217:
Back then, it was controversial for large organizations to post the code because it infact, WAS illegal (I think still is, even though HDDVD is dead). It looked almost exactly the same.
1257:
On the same subject, I wonder if the "No TWiT Today" incident really counts as a "controversy." I mean: is a blog post that gets a lot of comments on Digg really a notable occurence?
150:
1561:
1557:
1543:
1377:
started the ball rolling and is mentioned occasionally in the first couple episodes. The recording is short and difficult to track down but can currently be found
300:
457:), and "Future"? I admit these will be short categories, but I think it's safe to assume they will ultimately expand, and this will give us better organization
82:
1710:
290:
1157:
853:. I moved it here for now, since I'm not sure it deserves this much coverage. Maybe condense this down and add it to the "Other details" section? --
47:
1725:
1715:
1311:, not flashed to attract readership. That's why we follow publishing industry-standard avoidance of marketing- and trademark-driven experiments in
368:
266:
88:
583:
No, it's not mine. I have been debating weather or not to put up a site of my own, now that Leo is putting detailed summaries of each episode on
1218:
1720:
1705:
1471:
835:
Well, it doesn't hurt to have it. But its not the most listened to cast anymore. I think photoshop TV or something got ahead of it just. --
433:
33:
1421:
1297:
Follow standard
English text formatting and capitalization rules even if the trademark owner considers nonstandard formatting "official"
359:
323:
253:
230:
1161:
877:
Episode four was the first episode to use the "not suitable for family viewing" (TWIT Introduction) introduction with a random song.
102:
1641:
674:
So is it "in Tech" or "in Geek"? Were they both based on listeners' suggestions? Or what? This sentence is incredibly unclear.
107:
23:
171:
77:
1245:
205:
138:
68:
1091:
There has been talks about a drinking game every once and a while. So I googled it and found on digg a suggestion for one:
1244:
rate, posting the key was not TWiT-specific—thousands of websites did so as an act of coordinated civil disobediance (see
421:
1327:
Yeah, and while I am a twit subscriber, and have been since day one, I think that the article should follow the rules.
830:
1213:
How is posting a series of numbers controversial? It's not even the correct key? I don't see the controversy, deleting.
629:
Ah, heard it. Well, I'll guess I can consider her as a special guest, but still she only says like a couple of lines. --
894:
Episode ten was the first episode to use the TWiT theme song which was combined with the Jungle
Telegram introduction.
1403:"Petaluma resident Leo Laporte has built a $ 1 million broadcast empire online with audio podcasts about technology."
645:
874:
Episode three (the last episode refered to as "Revenge of the Screen Savers") used the
Charlie's Angels theme song.
132:
112:
1222:
1037:
832:
I think that the itunes ranking should probably be removed from the page, but I'll leave that up to someone else
1560:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1467:
417:
437:
211:
128:
1353:
On
October 22, 2006, Laporte posted a blog item.... The posting became one of the week's top stories on Digg.
1499:
1425:
1165:
1459:
1415:
1057:
1020:
article be made a disambiguation page which points to the following (example of how it could be worded):
927:
793:
178:
58:
1599:
1579:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1567:
906:
367:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
265:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1645:
1498:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
850:
73:
1307:
magazine; it's doubly true for something as eye-jarring as this title. Knowledge (XXG) is meant to be
1534:
1386:
866:
1024:
193:
1463:
1332:
959:
409:
Surely this is wrong! Copyrights don't protect titles of protected works, at least not in the USA.
262:
164:
1280:
1686:
1362:
1262:
1248:). If any of the above is incorrect, please cite a verifiable source and undelete the discussion.
1191:
926:
Agreed. Gibson has only been on two or three times and hasn't been on since at least TWiT 40. --
1564:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1580:
1455:
It seems the reference to TWiT's revenue should be on the TWiT.tv page, not the podcast page.
1404:
144:
1491:
1437:
1069:
1017:
888:
881:
813:, any suggestions on where to mention it? I'm not sure it deserves it own sectiong (yet), but
735:
655:
561:
351:
54:
27:
1150:
Leo mentions that he is trying to get Martin to join the show (two gulps if he actually does)
1659:
1628:
1595:
1587:
1382:
1319:
1200:
1182:
991:
915:
836:
954:
without explaining what that meant specifically, which kind of left people who never saw
1546:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
1441:
1328:
1104:
someone co-hosts from a strange location (an airport, under their car, Starbucks, etc.)
969:
818:
685:
675:
499:
Would it be too much to put show notes (a quick sentance or so) about each episode? --
1670:
1586:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1553:
1378:
520:
That's what I thought... maybe I'll create a seperate website for that info. Thanks,
335:
317:
1699:
1682:
1358:
1357:
I poked around on Digg for a while, but they don't seem to keep historical "charts".
1258:
1181:
Just a heads up, I am going to do a minor edit and change "programme" to "program."--
854:
782:
696:
623:
588:
535:
Post here (or email me) when you finish that - I'd be interested in reading it. :) --
521:
500:
472:
871:
Episode two (known as Revenge of the Screen Savers) used another song as the intro.
670:
This Week in Tech was chosen, based on one listener's suggestion, This Week in Geek.
1130:
any of the hosts gives the specific model of headset/microphone that they are using
1073:
1045:
536:
483:
462:
1621:
1655:
1312:
1032:
968:
It's something I've been meaning to do forever now! It looks good, great job! --
865:
Episode one (known as Revenge of the Screen Savers) used the song "A It Dat" by
508:
1552:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
1316:
1284:
979:
753:
644:
If anyone else is like me—wondering where episode zero is—the Torrent's right
364:
345:
341:
1147:
a well-known tech personality makes an unplanned visit (e.g. Mitnick's visit)
1068:
Just to follow up, I went ahead and created a new article for the network at
962:
630:
613:
1690:
1663:
1607:
1475:
1444:
1429:
1390:
1366:
1336:
1322:
1287:
1266:
1226:
1203:
1194:
1185:
1169:
1078:
1060:
1050:
994:
972:
930:
918:
909:
897:
Episode eleven was the first to use the introduction used up to this date.
839:
796:
738:
633:
616:
539:
511:
486:
465:
441:
425:
1190:
Then just mark it as a minor edit and put your reason in the edit summary.
1028:
748:" is just a stylized version of the name used in certain situations. "
730:
and on the podcast directories where they have an entry. I think it's
406:"to prevent copyright infringement, the show was referred to as ROTSS"
258:
1416:
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/technology/2009/03/theres-twitter.html
471:
I split the article into heading and filled them up a little more. --
245:
224:
1381:. Someone may want to add this information to the history section. --
1098:
anyone names the food/beverage that they are enjoying while recording
986:
914:
I wouldn't think so, they don't get onto the show much anymore. --
454:
1418:
despite lots of other possibly pertinent info from the article.
817:
doesn't really seem right. Maybe a little blurb in the intro? -
810:
1616:
1293:
There's no "may be" about it. Under "General rules", it says:
727:
187:
18:
1107:
either Robert or Roger mentions his current employment status
622:
Sarah also appears in the pilot episode (aka "Episode 0"). --
412:
It's a matter of potential TRADEMARK infringement, isn't it?
1519:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
1405:
http://www.pressdemocrat.com/article/20090329/NEWS/903290372
257:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of notable
1502:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
905:
Wouldn't Steve Gibson and Alex Lindsey be regular hosts?--
752:" appears on the TWiT website in several places. And the
1239:
controversy, but it's not so clear that he succeeded in
557:
1633:
1495:
1004:
This Week in Tech is now a network of podcasts (called
1654:
The image in the infobox is not displaying correctly.
1136:
someone trashes the user interface of a Google product
163:
1677:
Seems there was a non-standard character around the
1124:
they take a question from a listener or the audience
781:". I will add a note about this to the article. --
363:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1640:, contact the responding user(s) directly on their
1556:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
1094:BRSQUIRRL's TWIT Drinking Game: Take one sip if...
416:
Yes, it definately should be. Article's changed. --
177:
1631:has been answered. If you need more help, you can
1513:
1507:
887:Episodes six through nine used the old version of
608:"Special guests have included...Sarah Norton...".
556:I don't know if it's Taestell's site, but there's
584:
1681:parameter, causing things to not work properly.
1110:the show takes place in front of a live audience
1016:). Because of this, I propose that the current
891:theme song combined with the TWIT Introduction.
884:theme song combined with the TWIT Introduction.
36:for general discussion of the article's subject.
958:in the dark. Hope the edits don't offend... --
1542:This message was posted before February 2018.
1399:Podcast part of a $ 1 million broadcast empire
8:
1632:
1349:I'm not sure the following is verifiable:
1040:: the flagship podcast of the said network
312:
219:
1490:I have just modified 2 external links on
1101:Dvorak plugs his blog ("dvorak.org/blog")
461:, so we don't run into problems later. --
849:The content below was recently added by
938:He was on Episode 80 December 17 2006.
880:Episode five used the newer version of
648:. (Hey, maybe it'll come in handy for
314:
221:
191:
1678:
762:" would suggest that the spelling is "
684:Nevermind, I get it. Fixed sentence.
377:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Technology
275:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Podcasting
1531:to let others know (documentation at
7:
1279:This article may be in violation of
357:This article is within the scope of
251:This article is within the scope of
1154:Anyone want to add it to the page?
1044:Anyone agree/disagree with this? --
210:It is of interest to the following
26:for discussing improvements to the
1711:Mid-importance podcasting articles
14:
1494:. Please take a moment to review
809:TWiT won two podcast awards from
53:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome!
1669:
1620:
1116:Leo uses the phrase "in the can"
1113:Dvorak says that he gets no spam
344:
334:
316:
244:
223:
192:
48:Click here to start a new topic.
1726:WikiProject Technology articles
1716:WikiProject Podcasting articles
1512:Corrected formatting/usage for
1506:Corrected formatting/usage for
1275:WP:MOS-TM and this WEEK in TECH
1246:AACS encryption key controversy
1027:: a network of audio and video
857:20:40, September 7, 2005 (UTC)
380:Template:WikiProject Technology
295:This article has been rated as
278:Template:WikiProject Podcasting
1391:02:18, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
1367:04:37, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
1133:the "box of crap" is mentioned
507:Probably a little overkill...
1:
1204:05:30, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
1195:15:07, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
1170:05:56, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
1079:12:02, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
1008:) and also a podcast itself (
482:Nice - that's much better. --
371:and see a list of open tasks.
269:and see a list of open tasks.
45:Put new text under old text.
1691:02:37, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
1664:23:44, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
1288:07:31, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
1186:18:29, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
910:01:05, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
821:21:37, August 5, 2005 (UTC)
1721:C-Class Technology articles
1706:C-Class podcasting articles
1644:, or consider visiting the
1267:15:14, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
1227:12:35, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
1061:06:17, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
1051:14:28, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
1038:This Week in Tech (podcast)
785:04:21, July 23, 2005 (UTC)
263:podcast-related information
1742:
1573:(last update: 5 June 2024)
1487:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
699:22:57, July 25, 2005 (UTC)
626:20:25, May 21, 2005 (UTC)
503:02:24, May 16, 2005 (UTC)
444:La-Tonia Denise Willis
301:project's importance scale
1608:22:54, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
1476:15:35, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
1445:19:59, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
1430:17:03, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
1199:It has already happened--
995:06:01, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
931:15:50, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
919:07:30, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
840:21:09, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
797:15:47, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
739:00:22, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
688:15:02, 2005 May 31 (UTC)
678:14:56, 2005 May 31 (UTC)
591:June 30, 2005 02:38 (UTC)
524:19:57, May 16, 2005 (UTC)
475:03:11, May 10, 2005 (UTC)
329:
294:
239:
218:
83:Be welcoming to newcomers
1337:03:54, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
1323:05:13, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
1177:"Programme" to "Program"
973:16:44, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
658:30 June 2005 17:18 (UTC)
634:21:01, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
617:05:36, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
564:29 June 2005 22:27 (UTC)
540:01:56, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
512:03:09, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
487:19:44, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
1483:External links modified
963:06:57, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
744:As far as I can tell, "
722:? Because it's called
466:22:50, 9 May 2005 (UTC)
442:18:19, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
426:02:29, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
1355:
1140:Take a big gulp if...
360:WikiProject Technology
254:WikiProject Podcasting
200:This article is rated
78:avoid personal attacks
1351:
1160:comment was added by
1127:Leo mentions his book
985:Due to the fact that
204:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
103:Neutral point of view
1635:ask another question
1613:Cover art in infobox
1554:regular verification
1436:Might be better for
1120:Take two sips if...
108:No original research
1544:After February 2018
1523:parameter below to
1283:regarding casing. —
1235:It's clear Leo was
418:Consumed Crustacean
383:Technology articles
281:podcasting articles
1549:InternetArchiveBot
1077:
1049:
448:More organization?
206:content assessment
89:dispute resolution
50:
1652:
1651:
1637:on your talk page
1606:
1574:
1492:This Week in Tech
1479:
1462:comment added by
1438:TWiT.tv (network)
1345:Top Story on Digg
1303:This is true for
1173:
1144:a female co-hosts
1076:
1070:TWiT.tv (network)
1048:
1018:This Week in Tech
1010:this WEEK in TECH
956:The Screen Savers
952:The Screen Savers
889:The Screen Savers
882:The Screen Savers
851:User:67.53.79.145
811:PodcastAwards.com
790:This Week in Tech
750:This Week in Tech
746:this WEEK in TECH
732:this WEEK in TECH
724:this WEEK in TECH
720:this WEEK in TECH
716:This Week in Tech
585:the official site
399:
398:
395:
394:
391:
390:
352:Technology portal
311:
310:
307:
306:
186:
185:
69:Assume good faith
46:
28:This Week in Tech
1733:
1680:
1673:
1639:
1624:
1617:
1602:
1601:Talk to my owner
1597:
1572:
1571:
1550:
1538:
1478:
1456:
1155:
385:
384:
381:
378:
375:
354:
349:
348:
338:
331:
330:
320:
313:
283:
282:
279:
276:
273:
248:
241:
240:
235:
227:
220:
203:
197:
196:
188:
182:
181:
167:
98:Article policies
19:
1741:
1740:
1736:
1735:
1734:
1732:
1731:
1730:
1696:
1695:
1615:
1605:
1600:
1565:
1558:have permission
1548:
1532:
1514:http://twit.tv/
1508:http://twit.tv/
1500:this simple FaQ
1485:
1457:
1453:
1401:
1374:
1347:
1277:
1219:216.120.162.178
1211:
1179:
1156:—The preceding
1089:
1002:
983:
947:
903:
867:Wayne & Wax
863:
847:
827:
807:
712:
667:
606:
604:Sarah Norton...
497:
450:
404:
382:
379:
376:
373:
372:
350:
343:
280:
277:
274:
271:
270:
233:
201:
124:
119:
118:
117:
94:
64:
12:
11:
5:
1739:
1737:
1729:
1728:
1723:
1718:
1713:
1708:
1698:
1697:
1694:
1693:
1650:
1649:
1642:user talk page
1625:
1614:
1611:
1598:
1592:
1591:
1584:
1517:
1516:
1510:
1484:
1481:
1464:TimothyBJacobs
1452:
1449:
1448:
1447:
1400:
1397:
1395:
1373:
1370:
1346:
1343:
1342:
1341:
1340:
1339:
1301:
1300:
1299:
1276:
1273:
1272:
1271:
1270:
1269:
1252:
1251:
1250:
1249:
1230:
1229:
1210:
1207:
1178:
1175:
1152:
1151:
1148:
1145:
1138:
1137:
1134:
1131:
1128:
1125:
1118:
1117:
1114:
1111:
1108:
1105:
1102:
1099:
1088:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1082:
1081:
1058:75.132.105.161
1055:
1042:
1041:
1035:
1025:TWiT (network)
1001:
1000:Disambiguation
998:
982:
977:
976:
975:
946:
944:
943:
941:
936:
935:
934:
933:
928:Happynoodleboy
902:
899:
862:
859:
846:
843:
826:
825:itunes ranking
823:
806:
803:
802:
801:
800:
799:
794:Happynoodleboy
711:
708:
707:
706:
705:
704:
703:
702:
701:
700:
672:
671:
666:
665:Weird sentence
663:
662:
661:
660:
659:
639:
638:
637:
636:
605:
602:
601:
600:
599:
598:
597:
596:
595:
594:
593:
592:
572:
571:
570:
569:
568:
567:
566:
565:
547:
546:
545:
544:
543:
542:
528:
527:
526:
525:
515:
514:
496:
493:
492:
491:
490:
489:
477:
476:
449:
446:
434:67.183.122.227
429:
428:
403:
400:
397:
396:
393:
392:
389:
388:
386:
369:the discussion
356:
355:
339:
327:
326:
321:
309:
308:
305:
304:
297:Mid-importance
293:
287:
286:
284:
267:the discussion
249:
237:
236:
234:Mid‑importance
228:
216:
215:
209:
198:
184:
183:
121:
120:
116:
115:
110:
105:
96:
95:
93:
92:
85:
80:
71:
65:
63:
62:
51:
42:
41:
38:
37:
31:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1738:
1727:
1724:
1722:
1719:
1717:
1714:
1712:
1709:
1707:
1704:
1703:
1701:
1692:
1688:
1684:
1676:
1672:
1668:
1667:
1666:
1665:
1661:
1657:
1647:
1643:
1638:
1636:
1630:
1626:
1623:
1619:
1618:
1612:
1610:
1609:
1603:
1596:
1589:
1585:
1582:
1578:
1577:
1576:
1569:
1563:
1559:
1555:
1551:
1545:
1540:
1536:
1530:
1526:
1522:
1515:
1511:
1509:
1505:
1504:
1503:
1501:
1497:
1493:
1488:
1482:
1480:
1477:
1473:
1469:
1465:
1461:
1450:
1446:
1443:
1439:
1435:
1434:
1433:
1431:
1427:
1423:
1422:24.103.37.148
1419:
1417:
1411:
1407:
1406:
1398:
1396:
1393:
1392:
1388:
1384:
1380:
1371:
1369:
1368:
1364:
1360:
1354:
1350:
1344:
1338:
1334:
1330:
1326:
1325:
1324:
1321:
1318:
1314:
1310:
1306:
1302:
1298:
1295:
1294:
1292:
1291:
1290:
1289:
1286:
1282:
1274:
1268:
1264:
1260:
1256:
1255:
1254:
1253:
1247:
1242:
1238:
1234:
1233:
1232:
1231:
1228:
1224:
1220:
1216:
1215:
1214:
1208:
1206:
1205:
1202:
1197:
1196:
1193:
1192:Lyoko is Cool
1188:
1187:
1184:
1176:
1174:
1171:
1167:
1163:
1159:
1149:
1146:
1143:
1142:
1141:
1135:
1132:
1129:
1126:
1123:
1122:
1121:
1115:
1112:
1109:
1106:
1103:
1100:
1097:
1096:
1095:
1092:
1087:Drinking game
1086:
1080:
1075:
1071:
1067:
1066:
1065:
1064:
1063:
1062:
1059:
1053:
1052:
1047:
1039:
1036:
1034:
1030:
1026:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1019:
1015:
1011:
1007:
999:
997:
996:
993:
988:
981:
978:
974:
971:
967:
966:
965:
964:
961:
957:
953:
942:
939:
932:
929:
925:
924:
923:
922:
921:
920:
917:
912:
911:
908:
907:72.138.175.46
900:
898:
895:
892:
890:
885:
883:
878:
875:
872:
869:
868:
861:Music Details
860:
858:
856:
852:
844:
842:
841:
838:
833:
831:
824:
822:
820:
816:
815:Other details
812:
804:
798:
795:
791:
787:
786:
784:
780:
778:
774:
770:
766:
761:
760:
755:
751:
747:
743:
742:
741:
740:
737:
733:
729:
725:
721:
717:
709:
698:
694:
693:
690:
689:
687:
683:
682:
681:
680:
679:
677:
669:
668:
664:
657:
653:
652:
647:
643:
642:
641:
640:
635:
632:
628:
627:
625:
621:
620:
619:
618:
615:
609:
603:
590:
586:
582:
581:
580:
579:
578:
577:
576:
575:
574:
573:
563:
559:
558:TWiTnotes.com
555:
554:
553:
552:
551:
550:
549:
548:
541:
538:
534:
533:
532:
531:
530:
529:
523:
519:
518:
517:
516:
513:
510:
506:
505:
504:
502:
494:
488:
485:
481:
480:
479:
478:
474:
470:
469:
468:
467:
464:
460:
456:
447:
445:
443:
439:
435:
427:
423:
419:
415:
414:
413:
410:
407:
401:
387:
370:
366:
362:
361:
353:
347:
342:
340:
337:
333:
332:
328:
325:
322:
319:
315:
302:
298:
292:
289:
288:
285:
268:
264:
260:
256:
255:
250:
247:
243:
242:
238:
232:
229:
226:
222:
217:
213:
207:
199:
195:
190:
189:
180:
176:
173:
170:
166:
162:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
130:
127:
126:Find sources:
123:
122:
114:
113:Verifiability
111:
109:
106:
104:
101:
100:
99:
90:
86:
84:
81:
79:
75:
72:
70:
67:
66:
60:
56:
55:Learn to edit
52:
49:
44:
43:
40:
39:
35:
29:
25:
21:
20:
17:
1674:
1653:
1634:
1629:help request
1593:
1568:source check
1547:
1541:
1528:
1524:
1520:
1518:
1489:
1486:
1458:— Preceding
1454:
1451:TWiT Revenue
1420:
1412:
1408:
1402:
1394:
1375:
1372:Episode Zero
1356:
1352:
1348:
1308:
1304:
1296:
1278:
1240:
1236:
1212:
1209:Controversy?
1198:
1189:
1180:
1162:75.83.219.94
1153:
1139:
1119:
1093:
1090:
1054:
1043:
1013:
1009:
1005:
1003:
984:
955:
951:
948:
940:
937:
913:
904:
896:
893:
886:
879:
876:
873:
870:
864:
848:
834:
828:
814:
808:
789:
776:
772:
768:
764:
763:
758:
757:
749:
745:
736:Sixteen Left
731:
723:
719:
715:
713:
673:
656:Sixteen Left
650:
649:
610:
607:
562:Sixteen Left
498:
458:
451:
430:
411:
408:
405:
358:
296:
252:
212:WikiProjects
174:
168:
160:
153:
147:
141:
135:
125:
97:
22:This is the
15:
1535:Sourcecheck
1313:paleography
1033:Leo Laporte
845:New section
829:Because of
495:Show notes?
151:free images
34:not a forum
1700:Categories
1383:BenFranske
1241:generating
1201:Rabbitdude
1183:Rabbitdude
992:Alexbrewer
987:Molly Wood
980:Molly Wood
960:relaxathon
916:Handmedown
837:Handmedown
754:initialism
686:✈ James C.
676:✈ James C.
374:Technology
365:technology
324:Technology
272:Podcasting
231:Podcasting
1588:this tool
1581:this tool
1442:Falcorian
1432:Hachette
1329:Dbrodbeck
1281:WP:MOS-TM
1056:I agree.
970:Falcorian
819:Falcorian
714:So is it
91:if needed
74:Be polite
24:talk page
1683:Primefac
1646:Teahouse
1594:Cheers.—
1472:contribs
1460:unsigned
1359:Clconway
1259:Clconway
1237:inviting
1158:unsigned
1029:podcasts
945:Cleanin'
855:taestell
783:taestell
697:taestell
624:taestell
589:taestell
522:taestell
501:taestell
473:taestell
402:Untitled
259:podcasts
59:get help
32:This is
30:article.
1679:|image=
1604::Online
1521:checked
1496:my edit
1074:Tim1988
1046:Tim1988
1031:run by
728:website
726:on the
651:someone
537:Oreckel
484:Oreckel
463:Oreckel
299:on the
202:C-class
157:WP refs
145:scholar
1656:Daylen
1529:failed
1320:(talk)
1317:Jeff Q
805:Awards
654:....)—
509:Salvag
208:scale.
129:Google
1675:Fixed
1627:This
1285:Tokek
1012:, or
901:Hosts
587:. --
455:Skype
172:JSTOR
133:books
87:Seek
1687:talk
1660:talk
1525:true
1468:talk
1440:. --
1426:talk
1387:talk
1379:here
1363:talk
1333:talk
1315:. ~
1309:read
1305:Time
1263:talk
1223:talk
1166:talk
1072:. --
1014:TWiT
1006:TWiT
771:eek
767:his
759:TWiT
710:Name
646:here
631:Bash
614:Bash
438:talk
422:Talk
261:and
165:FENS
139:news
76:and
1562:RfC
1539:).
1527:or
779:ech
718:or
459:now
291:Mid
179:TWL
1702::
1689:)
1662:)
1575:.
1570:}}
1566:{{
1537:}}
1533:{{
1474:)
1470:•
1428:)
1389:)
1365:)
1335:)
1265:)
1225:)
1168:)
775:n
734:.—
612:--
560:.—
440:)
424:|
420:|
159:)
57:;
1685:(
1658:(
1648:.
1590:.
1583:.
1466:(
1424:(
1385:(
1361:(
1331:(
1261:(
1221:(
1172:.
1164:(
788:"
777:T
773:i
769:W
765:T
756:"
436:(
303:.
214::
175:·
169:·
161:·
154:·
148:·
142:·
136:·
131:(
61:.
16:À
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
