1686:- The reference book I was waiting for (about Johnston's possible apprenticeship) just came in. I have adjusted the article text accordingly with its information and I think the re-writing/recrafting/deleting of text/deleting of inaccessible sources on this article is now done. Not sure what the next step in this particular mass-GA process is, but I think this article in its present state should retain its GA status. Some clean-up might possibly remain but the last Who Wrote This? is telling me that DC's edits are down to 38.8% of this article (and doesn't that include the references and the Bibliography?). Taking a break -
1840:- Yes, I have looked into/read/examined all cited sources in this article. I can find no present "too close paraphrasing" in this article. I am unable to find any other of DC's problematic editing habits - misrepresenting sources' information, misattribution of sources, and so on - in this article in its present form. Anyone is welcome to go over the content to see if I am mistaken. The progenitor of this mess was wily in his misuse of sources and information. I must say, I do think that even though it is possible that I may have missed
533:
506:
636:
543:
648:
219:
387:
436:
418:
1649:
the article is written accordingly. I think in its present iteration that (maybe?) all of the problematic DC content - outright copyvios, close paraphrasing, leaping to conclusions unsupported by the then-cited reference's text, etc. - has been taken care of but I don't know at this point. I have to say...doing all this research I sure know more about Thomas
Johnston than lol I ever wanted to know.
324:
997:
process, so far as I can tell, this article doesn't seem to be as riddled with overwhelming copyvios like many of his other GAs. (One note is that some sources were published earlier than the 1927 copyright cut-off, but, even so, - yes I know we'd still need attribution - I haven't come across a ton of cut&pastes into this article... But maybe I'm wrong on all that.
1279:, I've reworked the bit above to remove vestiges of too-close paraphrasing, while also addressing another aspect of DC writing that was frequently promoted up the GA pole without adequate prose scruting; that is, his paragraphs made no sense, but reflected haphazard chunking in of unrelated and irrelevant factoids as if to meet the DYK word limits.
1312:. Yet we don't mention that. Because of other sloppiness in DC content, one could wonder if he even has the right person (he didn't always). This sort of thing should be worked out somewhere in the text and by doing full research on other sources. Was he referred to as Johnson by others, or was this source just off ?
446:
2344:. Per the PLS CHECK: That is the original publication as quoted by Green. It seemed appropriate to name the original source. I still think that is appropriate for verifiability and it seems inappropriate to delete that information. Perhaps it could have been rendered more elegantly but it was not incorrect.
2075:
are all the same (Exhibition
Catalogs). That can't be a valid source. DC apparently did this because he didn't know how to sfn when there was no author; you can see how to do that in the diff I give above, where I fixed Beers, which similarly was not the author, rather the publisher. If you click
2042:
That's a sample just to clean up those listed in sources using sfns, without even looking in the other citations in ref tags. What I'm pointing out in the other DC GARs is that leaving out author names and correct publishers often obscured non-reliable sources, so they should all be checked. Since
1449:
I stopped there, after looking at only a few paragraphs in one section. This is enough to show why I believe that blowing up any DC content and starting over is the fastest route to a proper article, and that work remains to prevent delisting. We can't just rephrase to avoid too-close paraphrasing;
1169:
If anyone wants to look over my progress, I'd appreciate it. I've torn apart and put back together almost all of the text, created a template of associated articles, replaced the See also section with that
Template, deleted references, adjusted captions, etc. I just don't know if it's enough...there
1040:
Deleted redundant and unneeded link to Green's "Blodget's Plan..." in
External links section. The book is already used as a reference. An oddity is the "See also" section, linking to multiple articles about American Colonial organ builders/engravers/printers...I think that these 3 designations might
1794:
articles. I am finished with its cleanup and am going to leave this GAR open for the next week, until
Tuesday/March 7th. If there aren't any according-to-policy objections/statements, I will close the GAR at that time. Barring any unforeseen issues, I intend for the article to retain its present GA
1648:
As to the article itself...I'm just trying to save it as a GA and doing everything I can towards that end. I have already done what you suggested but in my own fashion. I threw out all the offline sources and then have gone through each online source - checking what it actually states and seeing if
1541:
is an example what would be left... Some of the present GA's wording is utterly "The sky is blue" banal to me... so can I just write whatever out in common-sense language and that would be ok? I don't know how I can avoid all of DC's words/text...I just want to do the right thing by the subject and
855:
Just an aside...I had great hopes when I started this GAR but the refs are such a mess...for instance the
Hitchings & Reps refs are the same thing and Reps shouldn't even be credited! Plus the "Hitchings" cites are to a Google Books with no preview and the Reps are to the actual content... I'll
2448:
Re: engraver of skill - Johnston was well-known throughout New
England, advertised in the newspapers during his working life and made coats of arms for prominent citizens especially for what we would think of as mourning or funeral cards. He is probably one of the most well-documented craftsmen of
2413:
Thx for waiting for me, but I'm swamped. It is now marked off at the CCI, so that part is addressed, and the citations are clean, but other than that, I don't really understand the GA standards, but I think a copyedit is needed. Some samples: Grammatically, this seems to me like an awful lot of
1623:
Been taking a look. Not sure what to do with "initial known print of a historical event in the colonies", it doesn't make sense to me, and I don't really like working from snippet views. I can't quite figure out the edit history at the moment. My suggestion would have been to take every source and
996:
his text should/must be excised or completely re-written? Much of it seems to be bland facts that would be difficult to completely re-craft - I mean how many different ways can you say "The sky is blue" or "George
Washington was the first President of the United States", etc.. At this point in the
1221:
This is typical of DC's writing; specifically, his quest for "first facts" and overstating those facts. He translates a qualified statement in the source to a statement of fact in
Wikivoice. Unless there is another source calling this a Johnston first, the text should more carefully handle this
1743:
Given the ping, I note that the items I spot checked did not show any copyright violation or source misattribution. Taking a look at the other criteria, nothing stands out immensely. The most obvious source to raise interest is the youtube one, however this points to a primary source and seems
1255:
Here we see remnants of DC's too-close-paraphrasing, where he re-arranged and altered a few words. It's not just words; it's structure. This is an example of why it can be hard to fix DC content. He lifted structure from one article, and then later attached other citations to content. I've
1701:
That's a ton of work there! If you have personally checked and verified every source listed and every citation for copyvio and too-close paraphrasing, you could mark the article as now clean at the CCI page. As to whether it meets GA standards, I have to leave that to others; I have never
2513:
Thanks for your input. Of course, any WP article - even the vaunted
Featured ones - could usually do with some copyedits. Your proposals above are fine, I've replied to all of them, adjusted the text, etc but in my opinion copy edits such as these are somewhat beyond the scope of the
2310:
sentence? There are TWO prints in the literature, the first one - Johnston's 1755 American print done in Boston, the other one/the 2nd of the scene...the Jeffreys 1756 print done in London. It seems that Blodgett took Johnston's copper plate to London, had it reworked by Jeffreys and
800:
as a Colonial American engraver/organ-builder/first historical print in the the American colonies, etc., etc. but I intend to pick apart the text for copyright issues/too-close paraphrasing & to burrow into all the sources as being reliable and backing up what they are
2334:
2303:"On the left...(etc)" What isn't understood about that sentence? It describes the scene as it appears in the print (which conflates ALL the action over the entire course of the Battle into one panoramic scene where everything is happening everywhere all at once).
911:
Shearonink, one thing to be aware of is that DC often used content from one source, but stuck another citation on it, so you can't be sure anything he wrote isn't copyvio just because it's not a copyvio of the citation attached to the text. I suggest installing
2010:
offline and unavailable online but I have consulted a copy personally. It is a huge book with over 1200 pages. If anyone has a problem with this offline source they are free to consult a copy in a reference library like the Library of Congress or the
2039:, but in the case of DC's work, the citations are so bad that the content becomes unverifiable, and we should get it cleaned up. As an example, in the first three sources listed, two of the authors were wrong, and all three book titles were wrong.
1907:). Somehow I remained unaware that I might not be allowed to close this GAR but it is what it is.. Though seeing how grueling all this has been on the 2 GARs I've undertaken? I doubt there will be very many reassessments up for closing. At all.
991:
of the page... I feel somewhat responsible since I was the initial GA reviewer. I've basically decided anyway to pull the article completely apart and am going over *everything* with a fine-toothed editorial comb. Is it written in WP-stone that
2181:
Treasures of Americana from the Library of the New-York Historical Society: A Short Title List of Rare and Important Books, Broadsides, Maps and Manuscripts on Exhibition at the Society, January 24-August 29, 1969. (1969). New York Historical
2034:
I'm sorry I'm not making myself clear; the problem is that DC's work is not often verifiable (and copyvio is hard to track down), because author names are wrong and book titles are wrong. I recognize that clean citations aren't part of
2136:
Yes ... in the case of those I checked here, there is no effect on reliability, but in all of his other work there is ... which is why we should make sure we get it right (that is, we aren't hiding something with incorrect citations).
1477:
a GA could be rescued. I know you're right, but I'm going to come back to this later today. Thinking ahead...to "De-GA" this article in its present state, I just need to remove all its present content & stub-ify it into a couple
1728:
in this article as much as anyone possibly could. I now know more about Thomas Johnston than I ever wanted to lol. I apologize but my brain is toast today...can you please take pity on me and post the CCI link here? Thankseverso,
1011:
Trust your judgment ... if you see wording that sounds like it could have come from elsewhere, rewrite it. Based on the dozens of his articles I've been through, my own experience is that I don't trust a single word he wrote.
1624:
turn it into a series of bullet points, and then putting all those together yourself. You seem to have done a lot of rewriting, so perhaps you've managed this in another fashion. Is there specific feedback you're looking for?
153:
1546:" and the parameters of this mass-GAR process. Since DC is such a hot-button issue I'd rather not have someone come along later and nullify my non-GA version because I maybe used some words that DC also had used. Thanks,
840:
Went through the lead - simplistic text, instituted various fixes. Also deleted Garraty refs as being offline and inaccessible. The former Garraty statements/refs are now backed up by Dunlap/1918 & WIlliams/1915.
2476:
Patricia E. Kane, writing in Colonial Massachusetts Silversmiths and Jewelers, says that though "the identity of his master is not known" also theorizes that Johnston may have been trained by the craftsman William
2270:
Engraved and printed in Boston by Thomas Johnston, Blodget’s Prospective Plan found a market in England where Thomas Jefferys, a skilled engraver and cartographic publisher, issued the map with a somewhat altered
1884:: I believe this GAR (and all DCGARs) should be closed by an independent person; in one week, we will have four GAR Coords at least, and they should make the call. A week deadline is not reasonable or necessary.
2380:- Are there GAR Coordinators now? As the Reviewer (and "article rejuvenator" lol) I want to close this review with the article retaining its GA designation but am unsure as to the procedure especially since
688:
307:
2600:
1170:
are only so many ways to say "the sky is blue". I am waiting on a printed source to see if I can add information on who Johnston was apprenticed to since that information is presently missing. Thanks,
1215:: As Burnet was governor of the Colony of Massachusetts Bay in 1727–29, it would appear that this plate must bear about the same date, and it would thus be the earliest known production of Johnston.
2399:
I've been watching this and would like to get it closed this weekend. There's definitely hope for keeping this GA, but I would like to hear Sandy's thoughts. CMD's endorsement does help quite a bit.
1386:
This is cited to Dunlap but I don't find it in Dunlap. This is a DC classic, whereby text is taken from one source but cited to another, and the wording of this sentence is suggestive of copyvio.
1597:
Just ran WWT again...My contributions are at 44.4%, DC's at 48%. His contributions to the article text are minimal at present, I think his percentage is mostly contained to references and so on.
1560:
Remember that 69% includes stuff like citations ... Who Wrote That shows a good deal of what is there now is yours. You just have to comb through everything the way I did in the examples above.
332:
1933:
Below. When I state the Reference. When I state the a/b/c instances. That will unequivocally mean that ALL references and ALL the information they back up, have been checked, personally, by me.
1579:
Have continued to chip away. DC's contributions now down to 53%, mine are at 38.4%. If anyone want to look in on this GAR's progress and read over the present version - including the amazing
2625:
1251:: Boston house painter and decorator, japanner, engraver, painter of coats of arms, church singer, publisher of singing-books and pioneer New England builder of organs, Johnston was also ...
2187:
That sort of stuff is throughout his work, and in many cases, there was no link, so copyvio checking became impossible. It is often hard to figure out exactly what work is being cited.
1904:
1837:
1814:
573:
147:
896:
Fixed issues with the Library of Congress publication cite (didn't have the pages in the URL, URL was to an incomplete cite, etc). Added ref for list of Johnston's engravings.
741:
2635:
1903:
Ah, just now saw this. A week isn't reasonable? I guess it'll just wait until maybe someone independent can get to it or whatever happens (having seen your recent post at
590:
44:
1185:
I'm having a look with Who Wrote That? of whatever remnants remain of DC content ... keeping in mind the sorts of sloppy research and writing found in other articles.
737:
2265:
Johnston engraved Blodgett's sketch onto a copper plate with Boston printer Richard Draper printing it, with the print then being sold by Blodgett in December 1755.
2620:
2431:
Maybe it seems repetitive but it is not. All those businesses and crafts are separate skills. All those crafts and skills appear in the literature about Johnston.
722:
626:
616:
230:
2645:
2640:
2595:
714:
580:
1484:
Thomas Johnston (1708-1767) was an engraver known for creating , He was also the first known manufacturer of pipe organs in Colonial America. The artist
79:
2449:
his era. I tried to get a CC-By-SA photo of his memorial plaque that appears inside the sanctuary of Boston's Old North Church but I was unsuccessful.
190:
2630:
2615:
2443:
Why not something like: He was an engraver of skill and a heraldic painter whose works included views of Boston. (What is an "engraver of skill"?)
585:
2438:
He was an engraver of skill, and a heraldic painter. The paintings and engravings he sold in his store included views of Boston and heraldic works.
2610:
1663:
I guess that's about it. Thanks for your edits. I keep on trying to get other things done in Real Life but Thomas Johnston keeps drawing me back.
464:
349:
1450:
everything DC wrote is suspect, thorough research is needed on anything claimed as fact, and his content needs to be rebuilt from the ground up.
2114:
Actually it is very clear. So, you are stating that the sources, thought what they state is verifiable at the links provided, that the way the
1080:
1076:
85:
1416:
term without feeling like a broken record so explanatory text didn't seem awry in this case... I can recraft that text if it seems needful.
2605:
468:
2319:
London (a mere six weeks later I believe). The two prints are very different, that is why I made it clear which is which in the article.
805:
to back up etc. - all to figure out if there is enough meat left on the bones of this article after the Review to retain its GA status.
762:
661:
556:
516:
511:
288:
248:
935:
Oh dear...yes, I know. I have worked my way through all the refs, deleted much, fixed some other things...the problem is that he wrote
168:
568:
472:
135:
2466:
Because I have always seen the word hyphenated. I can't find anything that says the hyphen is wrong but I'll go ahead and remove it.
463:, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Knowledge's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
2175:
2590:
2019:
That's all I have time for now. Will continue as soon as I can get to finishing this all up, hopefully within the next few days.
1656:
Boston's Old North Church but the only photo I have found so far is on BillionGraves and that is behind a registration/paywall -
2515:
2325:
459:
423:
236:
99:
30:
1924:
I have already stated I've checked everything and not that I think this next is completely necessary but since it seems to be
1744:
appropriately used. Not an area of personal en.wiki familiarity, but writing and breadth seem alright. No complaints from me.
2555:
2404:
2355:
page & date ranges are supposed to use the shorter "en dash". All the changes in this edit are to the longer "em dash"...
777:
104:
20:
856:
fix those and then am taking a break and reconsidering whether or not I want to continue. The issue for me is that Johnston
700:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
564:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
2577:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
1332:
1216:
129:
74:
2541:
1301:
879:
398:
2239:. It baffles my mind how DC got so many GAs through when the sources were scarcely verifiable. Pride in authorship.
1209:: His first known engraving is his 1729 Plan of Boston which had a dedication to Massachusetts Governor William Burnet.
65:
2262:
On the left an above view of marching soldiers, on the right the view of the soldiers' camp and of the battle itself.
1652:
There is one thing. I have been trying to find a CC-BY-SA/"Free" photo of his memorial tablet that is one of the few
125:
1141:
I'm not up on all the technical aspects of template editing, but to the best of my knowledge, yes, that's the idea.
913:
2381:
1787:
1098:
707:
360:
185:
24:
2551:
2417:
While he advertised his businesses as being organ making, engraving, and furniture merchant, he also worked as a
2400:
2174:
The author, title, and publisher are all New York Historical Society, as in the Exhibition Catalogs. Oddly, the
1538:
773:
2522:. I think so but someone other than myself will have to close it as retaining or as removing the GA imprimatur.
199:
175:
2537:
1749:
1629:
1485:
1124:
1083:
since these American Colonial Cats don't seem to exist (so far as I can tell) and I think they'd be useful.
1075:
I don't disagree that is it junk of a type but I am keeping them there for the moment since I have posted a
109:
2089:
Yes, the citation page there actually states there is no publisher, because the Grolier Club published it.
826:
section as to whether (or not) the cited refs are available online so their claims can be easily verified.
2536:
As the copyright problems have been resolved, I think this is of sufficient quality to retain its circle.
2501:
2283:
2249:
2219:
2197:
2147:
2105:
2053:
1894:
1868:
1827:
1712:
1570:
1520:
1510:
There is probably more salvageable than that :) There is no hurry. Yes, I suggest keeping the template.
1460:
1396:
1345:
1322:
1289:
1266:
1232:
1195:
1151:
1111:
1066:
1022:
971:
926:
404:
342:
218:
2169:
New-York Historical Society, Library (1969). New-York Historical Society. New York Historical Society.
2076:
on the link supplied for this "Exhibition Catalog", you will find that the correct citation would be:
141:
2527:
2389:
2363:
2127:
2024:
1912:
1858:
I was referring to the need to clean up citations as long as we're at it (re-read my comment there).
1849:
1800:
1767:
1734:
1691:
1668:
1602:
1588:
1583:- and maybe give some feedback, that would be helpful. I need to take a break for the rest of today.
1551:
1501:
1437:
1421:
1369:
1175:
1132:
1088:
1046:
1002:
944:
901:
887:
869:
846:
831:
810:
771:: Consensus is that the article has been rewritten and improved sufficiently to retain its GA status.
653:
548:
1473:*sigh* This all makes me incredibly sad... From the beginning of this GAR I had hoped that this GA
796:
up for GAR to prevent it from being mass-delisted. The subject appears to be notable enough for an
323:
161:
55:
1382:
His furniture manufacture included rendering raised and embossed images into clocks and furniture.
2491:
I stopped there because swamped, but maybe a run through to pick up any ce needs before closing.
1759:
1745:
1683:
1642:
1625:
1529:
Well, my problem going forward is that DC wrote about 69.4% of the article's present text. Since
982:
793:
204:
70:
532:
505:
1056:
That junk should be built into a horizontal template; it's not an appropriate use of See also.
2510:
2492:
2377:
2274:
2240:
2210:
2188:
2138:
2096:
2044:
1885:
1859:
1818:
1721:
1703:
1680:
1580:
1561:
1511:
1470:
1451:
1387:
1336:
1313:
1280:
1257:
1223:
1186:
1142:
1120:
1102:
1057:
1013:
962:
917:
240:
51:
2326:
https://bostonraremaps.com/inventory/rare-english-edition-of-the-first-american-battle-plan/
451:
201:
2335:
File:1890 Facsimile of the 1755 Thomas Johnston engraving of the Battle of Lake George,.jpg
2066:
Exhibition Catalogs (1908). Exhibition Catalogs, 1886–1909: 1908–1909. Exhibition Catalogs.
1657:
880:
The Portraits of Increase Mather: With Some Notes on Thomas Johnson, an English Mezzotinter
635:
2523:
2385:
2359:
2123:
2036:
2020:
1908:
1845:
1810:
1796:
1791:
1763:
1730:
1687:
1664:
1598:
1584:
1547:
1497:
1433:
1417:
1365:
1171:
1128:
1084:
1042:
998:
940:
897:
883:
865:
842:
827:
806:
789:
2092:
No need to go looking for an author or a publisher by the name of "Exhibition Catalogs".
1245:: Johnston also worked as a japanner, a coats of arms painter, and a publisher of books.
2559:
2545:
2531:
2505:
2408:
2393:
2367:
2287:
2253:
2223:
2201:
2151:
2131:
2109:
2057:
2028:
1916:
1898:
1872:
1853:
1831:
1804:
1771:
1753:
1738:
1716:
1695:
1672:
1633:
1606:
1592:
1574:
1555:
1524:
1505:
1464:
1441:
1425:
1400:
1373:
1349:
1326:
1293:
1270:
1236:
1199:
1179:
1155:
1136:
1115:
1092:
1070:
1050:
1026:
1006:
975:
961:
Or rewrite in your own words to be sure it didn't come from some other offline source.
948:
930:
905:
891:
873:
850:
835:
814:
781:
2300:
I don't quite agree that copyedits are needed on those sentences, on that information.
203:
2584:
561:
1127:
I have dummied up in my Sandbox and let me know if it's good to go? Or not. Thanks,
1543:
2418:
2273:
so it's even harder to understand what the sentence about printing (above) means.
2043:
three out of three that I checked were wrong, it seems this should be addressed.
1645:- I just C/E'ed that phrase, found a museum description that I think will suffice.
1493:
Can I retain the craftspeople Template since I created it? Would all that be ok?
916:
and being sure you obliterate all traces of DC if you want to save the listing.
878:
Deleted the errant/false claims re: "Mather portrait". See Page 6 of Murdock's
823:
792:
and as the original GA reviewer in 2018 I am placing this article nominated by
435:
417:
643:
538:
441:
2352:
1413:
336:
560:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
882:
where he specifically states this Thomas Johnston didn't do the portrait.
1360:
Have just added a referenced Note re: the Johnson/Johnston variants with
1304:, we see another common element in DC content. This source names him as
1408:
Actually, that text is mine. Because rendering embossed images actually
1937:
Though, of course, if anyone wants to check my scholarship? Have at it.
1702:
participated at GA, and don't understand the standards. Best regards,
1533:
of his contributions are suspect (and, yes, rightly so), if I delete
2209:
The Society (1918). Colonial Society of Massachusetts. The Society
471:. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
2178:
is never even listed! The actual citation should look more like:
2306:
Re: the "it was first" source. What isn't to be understood about
1973:
10-Boston Folks' Coats of Arms/Boston Daily Globe/1915 - checked.
380:
205:
15:
2459:
This Johnston pipe-organ was in regular use until the 1820s.
634:
824:
Working through this article's refs per the individual GAR
1412:"japanning"...there were only so many ways to repeat the
1658:
https://billiongraves.com/grave/THOMAS-JOHNSTON/16870280
2348:
2341:
2236:
2090:
2040:
1361:
1276:
757:
749:
718:
300:
281:
2601:
Knowledge Did you know articles that are good articles
1905:
Knowledge:Good article reassessment/Ramsdell Theatre/1
1838:
Knowledge:Good article reassessment/Automatic scorer/1
1815:
Knowledge:Good article reassessment/Automatic scorer/1
1432:
I've adjusted that text to hopefully make it clearer.
160:
2006:
21-Kane/1998 - checked. A personal note: This source
2550:
Sorry for the delay. I'll close this as a keep now.
364:
made the first historical print engraved in America?
860:notable & I think deserves a GA but definitely
2626:GA-Class United States articles of Mid-importance
2337:is an 1890 reprint of the 1755 Johnston original.
939:much in this article. Obliterate it all? *sigh*.
818:I have already gone through all the refs etc on
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
2258:There are still copyedit needs, samples only:
1097:Sounds reasonable ... if you need a model, see
1762:- appreciate your thoughts on this very much.
246:If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
2421:, painted coats of arms, and published books.
2063:Continuing, the fourth source is written as:
174:
8:
2268:Note the source claiming it was first says:
1967:8-Japanned Furniture/News Journal - checked.
500:
412:
260:
213:
2636:Unknown-importance Massachusetts articles
2081:Exhibition Catalogs, 1886–1909: 1908–1909
1946:1-Heraldic Journal - both A, B - checked.
1335:and yet the article never mentions that.
2071:meaning the author, title and publisher
1539:rewrite of the lead and early paragraphs
1041:be worthwhile Categories to be enacted.
2473:Something off in the punctuation here:
502:
414:
2269:
2235:Finished citation cleanup; here's the
2621:Mid-importance United States articles
1724:Thank you. I do think I've gone over
1081:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Categories
7:
864:the DC version I started to review.
696:The following discussion is closed.
554:This article is within the scope of
457:This article is within the scope of
386:
384:
2384:was one of the DC bunch... Thanks,
601:Knowledge:WikiProject United States
23:for discussing improvements to the
2646:WikiProject United States articles
2641:WikiProject Massachusetts articles
2596:Art and architecture good articles
2315:version was subseqently published
1994:17-Ogasapian/2007 - A,B - checked.
604:Template:WikiProject United States
231:Art and architecture good articles
14:
1844:I think it is highly improbable.
1333:this source also gives us Johnson
239:. If you can improve it further,
2573:The discussion above is closed.
1985:14-OHS Database - A,B - checked.
1964:7-Williams 1915 - A,B - checked.
1949:2-Dunlap 1918 - A,B,C - checked.
646:
541:
531:
504:
444:
434:
416:
385:
322:
217:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
2631:GA-Class Massachusetts articles
2616:GA-Class United States articles
2206:Another non-sensical citation:
820:Talk:Thomas Johnston (engraver)
758:Watch article reassessment page
621:This article has been rated as
481:Knowledge:WikiProject Biography
2611:WikiProject Biography articles
2414:tense switching or something:
484:Template:WikiProject Biography
403:It is of interest to multiple
227:has been listed as one of the
1:
2426:This seems quite repetitive:
2122:are incorrect. . Ok, Got it.
1805:21:17, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
1739:14:47, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
1717:07:00, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
1696:05:03, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
1673:15:27, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
1634:09:54, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
1607:04:45, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
1593:17:54, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
1575:17:52, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
1556:17:37, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
1525:15:47, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
1506:15:30, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
1465:13:54, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
1442:07:07, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
1426:21:23, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
1401:13:25, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
1374:21:16, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
1350:13:16, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
1327:13:12, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
1294:13:07, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
1271:13:07, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
1237:12:43, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
1200:12:43, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
1180:06:24, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
1156:23:10, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
1137:22:54, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
1116:19:12, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
1093:19:04, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
1071:18:03, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
1051:18:00, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
1027:20:02, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
1007:19:27, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
976:19:11, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
949:19:04, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
931:18:02, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
906:17:48, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
892:05:04, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
874:20:27, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
851:20:01, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
836:19:06, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
815:18:59, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
659:This article is supported by
42:Put new text under old text.
2003:20-Hitchings/1973 - checked.
2000:19-Hitchings/1973 - checked.
1982:13-Ogasapian/2007 - checked.
1958:5-Staff/Home Page - checked.
1542:do everything according to "
469:contribute to the discussion
2606:GA-Class biography articles
2518:. Is this article now good
1970:9-Hitchings 1973 - checked.
1955:4-Hitchings 1985 - checked.
1123:- Could you take a look at
356:The text of the entry was:
50:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
2662:
2560:18:58, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
2546:17:12, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
2532:22:22, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
2506:21:18, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
2409:14:19, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
2394:13:41, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
2382:Thomas Johnston (engraver)
1988:15-Babcock/1947 - checked.
1788:Thomas Johnston (engraver)
1099:Template:Tourette syndrome
782:19:00, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
689:Thomas Johnston (engraver)
627:project's importance scale
225:Thomas Johnston (engraver)
25:Thomas Johnston (engraver)
2368:20:08, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
2288:05:48, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
2254:05:03, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
2224:04:19, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
2202:03:33, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
2166:Here's another good one:
2152:03:00, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
2132:02:58, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
2110:02:43, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
2058:02:33, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
2029:01:31, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
1935:And that will have to do.
1917:20:08, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
1899:05:50, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
1873:17:15, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
1854:17:14, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
1832:17:02, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
1772:16:56, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
1754:12:29, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
662:WikiProject Massachusetts
642:
620:
557:WikiProject United States
526:
429:
411:
371:
308:Good article reassessment
263:
259:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
2575:Please do not modify it.
1991:16-Dudas/2021 - checked.
1961:6-Bolton 1923 - checked.
1836:Sandy - Re your note at
698:Please do not modify it.
562:United States of America
335:appeared on Knowledge's
2591:Knowledge good articles
2014:22-Kane/1998 - checked.
1997:18-Owen/1985 - checked.
1979:12-Owen/1979 - checked.
1976:11-Owen/1985 - checked.
1256:rewritten (see below).
1077:Possible new categories
2328:is the Jeffreys print.
2176:real title of the work
1952:3-cite map - checked.
1277:With these adjustments
639:
607:United States articles
393:This article is rated
358:Did you know ... that
333:fact from this article
75:avoid personal attacks
2538:~~ AirshipJungleman29
2083:. Grolier Club. 1908.
1125:the Johnston template
638:
460:WikiProject Biography
237:good article criteria
100:Neutral point of view
2552:Trainsandotherthings
2401:Trainsandotherthings
2358:That's all for now.
774:Trainsandotherthings
654:Massachusetts portal
549:United States portal
289:Good article nominee
105:No original research
1790:is one of the many
1488:worked in his shop.
575:Articles Requested!
2349:this "dashes" edit
2342:this Obituary edit
1544:according to Hoyle
914:WP:Who Wrote That?
763:Most recent review
699:
640:
487:biography articles
399:content assessment
264:Article milestones
86:dispute resolution
47:
986:
697:
677:
676:
673:
672:
669:
668:
499:
498:
495:
494:
379:
378:
317:
316:
255:
212:
211:
66:Assume good faith
43:
2653:
2498:
2456:Why the hyphen:
2280:
2246:
2216:
2194:
2144:
2102:
2084:
2050:
1891:
1865:
1824:
1709:
1567:
1517:
1481:Something like:
1457:
1393:
1342:
1319:
1286:
1263:
1229:
1192:
1148:
1108:
1063:
1019:
980:
968:
923:
772:
760:
754:
745:
726:
656:
651:
650:
649:
609:
608:
605:
602:
599:
551:
546:
545:
544:
535:
528:
527:
522:
519:
508:
501:
489:
488:
485:
482:
479:
465:join the project
454:
452:Biography portal
449:
448:
447:
438:
431:
430:
420:
413:
396:
390:
389:
388:
381:
372:Current status:
350:January 22, 2018
326:
303:
284:
282:October 23, 2020
261:
244:
221:
214:
206:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
2661:
2660:
2656:
2655:
2654:
2652:
2651:
2650:
2581:
2580:
2579:
2578:
2516:six GA criteria
2496:
2278:
2244:
2237:cumulative diff
2214:
2192:
2142:
2100:
2079:
2048:
1889:
1863:
1822:
1813:see my note at
1707:
1565:
1515:
1455:
1391:
1340:
1317:
1284:
1261:
1227:
1190:
1146:
1106:
1061:
1017:
987:Well, he wrote
966:
921:
767:
756:
735:
712:
706:
702:
692:
685:
683:GA Reassessment
652:
647:
645:
606:
603:
600:
597:
596:
595:
581:Become a Member
547:
542:
540:
520:
514:
486:
483:
480:
477:
476:
450:
445:
443:
397:on Knowledge's
394:
367:
366:
361:Thomas Johnston
354:
299:
280:
208:
207:
202:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
2659:
2657:
2649:
2648:
2643:
2638:
2633:
2628:
2623:
2618:
2613:
2608:
2603:
2598:
2593:
2583:
2582:
2572:
2571:
2570:
2569:
2568:
2567:
2566:
2565:
2564:
2563:
2562:
2489:
2488:
2487:
2486:
2485:
2479:
2478:
2471:
2470:
2469:
2468:
2467:
2461:
2460:
2454:
2453:
2452:
2451:
2450:
2441:
2440:
2439:
2435:
2434:
2433:
2432:
2424:
2423:
2422:
2375:
2374:
2373:
2372:
2371:
2370:
2356:
2345:
2338:
2329:
2320:
2304:
2301:
2293:
2292:
2291:
2290:
2263:
2233:
2232:
2231:
2230:
2229:
2228:
2227:
2226:
2204:
2185:
2184:
2183:
2172:
2171:
2170:
2159:
2158:
2157:
2156:
2155:
2154:
2095:And so on ...
2093:
2087:
2086:
2085:
2069:
2068:
2067:
2032:
2031:
2016:
2015:
2012:
2004:
2001:
1998:
1995:
1992:
1989:
1986:
1983:
1980:
1977:
1974:
1971:
1968:
1965:
1962:
1959:
1956:
1953:
1950:
1947:
1942:
1938:
1936:
1934:
1932:
1931:, here goes...
1922:
1921:
1920:
1919:
1879:
1878:
1877:
1876:
1875:
1786:
1781:
1780:
1779:
1778:
1777:
1776:
1775:
1774:
1678:
1677:
1676:
1675:
1661:
1650:
1646:
1637:
1636:
1620:
1619:
1618:
1617:
1616:
1615:
1614:
1613:
1612:
1611:
1610:
1609:
1494:
1491:
1490:
1489:
1486:John Greenwood
1479:
1447:
1446:
1445:
1444:
1429:
1428:
1384:
1383:
1379:
1378:
1377:
1376:
1355:
1354:
1353:
1352:
1297:
1296:
1253:
1252:
1246:
1219:
1218:
1210:
1203:
1202:
1167:
1166:
1165:
1164:
1163:
1162:
1161:
1160:
1159:
1158:
1038:
1037:
1036:
1035:
1034:
1033:
1032:
1031:
1030:
1029:
954:
953:
952:
951:
817:
786:
785:
784:
765:
703:
694:
693:
691:
686:
684:
681:
679:
675:
674:
671:
670:
667:
666:
658:
657:
641:
631:
630:
623:Mid-importance
619:
613:
612:
610:
594:
593:
588:
583:
578:
571:
569:Template Usage
565:
553:
552:
536:
524:
523:
521:Mid‑importance
509:
497:
496:
493:
492:
490:
456:
455:
439:
427:
426:
421:
409:
408:
402:
391:
377:
376:
369:
368:
355:
330:
329:
327:
319:
318:
315:
314:
311:
304:
301:March 22, 2023
296:
295:
292:
285:
277:
276:
273:
270:
266:
265:
257:
256:
222:
210:
209:
200:
198:
197:
194:
193:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2658:
2647:
2644:
2642:
2639:
2637:
2634:
2632:
2629:
2627:
2624:
2622:
2619:
2617:
2614:
2612:
2609:
2607:
2604:
2602:
2599:
2597:
2594:
2592:
2589:
2588:
2586:
2576:
2561:
2557:
2553:
2549:
2548:
2547:
2543:
2539:
2535:
2534:
2533:
2529:
2525:
2521:
2517:
2512:
2509:
2508:
2507:
2503:
2499:
2495:
2490:
2483:
2482:
2481:
2480:
2475:
2474:
2472:
2465:
2464:
2463:
2462:
2458:
2457:
2455:
2447:
2446:
2445:
2444:
2442:
2437:
2436:
2430:
2429:
2428:
2427:
2425:
2420:
2416:
2415:
2412:
2411:
2410:
2406:
2402:
2398:
2397:
2396:
2395:
2391:
2387:
2383:
2379:
2369:
2365:
2361:
2357:
2354:
2350:
2346:
2343:
2339:
2336:
2330:
2327:
2321:
2318:
2314:
2309:
2305:
2302:
2299:
2298:
2297:
2296:
2295:
2294:
2289:
2285:
2281:
2277:
2272:
2267:
2266:
2264:
2261:
2260:
2259:
2256:
2255:
2251:
2247:
2243:
2238:
2225:
2221:
2217:
2213:
2208:
2207:
2205:
2203:
2199:
2195:
2191:
2186:
2180:
2179:
2177:
2173:
2168:
2167:
2165:
2164:
2163:
2162:
2161:
2160:
2153:
2149:
2145:
2141:
2135:
2134:
2133:
2129:
2125:
2121:
2117:
2113:
2112:
2111:
2107:
2103:
2099:
2094:
2091:
2088:
2082:
2078:
2077:
2074:
2070:
2065:
2064:
2062:
2061:
2060:
2059:
2055:
2051:
2047:
2041:
2038:
2030:
2026:
2022:
2018:
2017:
2013:
2009:
2005:
2002:
1999:
1996:
1993:
1990:
1987:
1984:
1981:
1978:
1975:
1972:
1969:
1966:
1963:
1960:
1957:
1954:
1951:
1948:
1945:
1944:
1943:
1939:
1930:
1927:
1918:
1914:
1910:
1906:
1902:
1901:
1900:
1896:
1892:
1888:
1883:
1880:
1874:
1870:
1866:
1862:
1857:
1856:
1855:
1851:
1847:
1843:
1839:
1835:
1834:
1833:
1829:
1825:
1821:
1816:
1812:
1809:
1808:
1807:
1806:
1802:
1798:
1793:
1789:
1785:
1773:
1769:
1765:
1761:
1757:
1756:
1755:
1751:
1747:
1742:
1741:
1740:
1736:
1732:
1727:
1723:
1720:
1719:
1718:
1714:
1710:
1706:
1700:
1699:
1698:
1697:
1693:
1689:
1685:
1682:
1674:
1670:
1666:
1662:
1659:
1655:
1651:
1647:
1644:
1641:
1640:
1639:
1638:
1635:
1631:
1627:
1622:
1621:
1608:
1604:
1600:
1596:
1595:
1594:
1590:
1586:
1582:
1578:
1577:
1576:
1572:
1568:
1564:
1559:
1558:
1557:
1553:
1549:
1545:
1540:
1536:
1532:
1528:
1527:
1526:
1522:
1518:
1514:
1509:
1508:
1507:
1503:
1499:
1495:
1492:
1487:
1483:
1482:
1480:
1476:
1472:
1469:
1468:
1467:
1466:
1462:
1458:
1454:
1443:
1439:
1435:
1431:
1430:
1427:
1423:
1419:
1415:
1411:
1407:
1406:
1405:
1404:
1403:
1402:
1398:
1394:
1390:
1381:
1380:
1375:
1371:
1367:
1363:
1359:
1358:
1357:
1356:
1351:
1347:
1343:
1339:
1334:
1330:
1329:
1328:
1324:
1320:
1316:
1311:
1307:
1303:
1299:
1298:
1295:
1291:
1287:
1283:
1278:
1275:
1274:
1273:
1272:
1268:
1264:
1260:
1250:
1247:
1244:
1241:
1240:
1239:
1238:
1234:
1230:
1226:
1217:
1214:
1211:
1208:
1205:
1204:
1201:
1197:
1193:
1189:
1184:
1183:
1182:
1181:
1177:
1173:
1157:
1153:
1149:
1145:
1140:
1139:
1138:
1134:
1130:
1126:
1122:
1119:
1118:
1117:
1113:
1109:
1105:
1100:
1096:
1095:
1094:
1090:
1086:
1082:
1078:
1074:
1073:
1072:
1068:
1064:
1060:
1055:
1054:
1053:
1052:
1048:
1044:
1028:
1024:
1020:
1016:
1010:
1009:
1008:
1004:
1000:
995:
990:
984:
983:edit conflict
979:
978:
977:
973:
969:
965:
960:
959:
958:
957:
956:
955:
950:
946:
942:
938:
934:
933:
932:
928:
924:
920:
915:
910:
909:
908:
907:
903:
899:
894:
893:
889:
885:
881:
876:
875:
871:
867:
863:
859:
853:
852:
848:
844:
838:
837:
833:
829:
825:
821:
816:
812:
808:
804:
799:
795:
794:Doug Coldwell
791:
783:
779:
775:
770:
766:
764:
759:
753:
752:
748:
743:
739:
734:
733:
729:
724:
720:
716:
711:
710:
705:
704:
701:
690:
687:
682:
680:
664:
663:
655:
644:
637:
633:
632:
628:
624:
618:
615:
614:
611:
598:United States
592:
589:
587:
584:
582:
579:
577:
576:
572:
570:
567:
566:
563:
559:
558:
550:
539:
537:
534:
530:
529:
525:
518:
517:Massachusetts
513:
512:United States
510:
507:
503:
491:
474:
473:documentation
470:
466:
462:
461:
453:
442:
440:
437:
433:
432:
428:
425:
422:
419:
415:
410:
406:
400:
392:
383:
382:
375:
370:
365:
363:
362:
352:
351:
346:
344:
343:Did you know?
338:
334:
328:
325:
321:
320:
312:
310:
309:
305:
302:
298:
297:
293:
291:
290:
286:
283:
279:
278:
274:
271:
268:
267:
262:
258:
253:
251:
250:
242:
238:
234:
233:
232:
226:
223:
220:
216:
215:
196:
195:
192:
189:
187:
183:
182:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
2574:
2519:
2511:SandyGeorgia
2493:
2378:SandyGeorgia
2376:
2316:
2312:
2307:
2275:
2257:
2241:
2234:
2211:
2189:
2139:
2119:
2115:
2097:
2080:
2072:
2045:
2033:
2011:Smithsonian.
2007:
1940:
1928:
1925:
1923:
1886:
1881:
1860:
1841:
1819:
1783:
1782:
1725:
1722:SandyGeorgia
1704:
1681:SandyGeorgia
1679:
1653:
1581:SandyGeorgia
1562:
1534:
1530:
1512:
1474:
1471:SandyGeorgia
1452:
1448:
1409:
1388:
1385:
1337:
1314:
1309:
1305:
1281:
1258:
1254:
1248:
1242:
1224:
1220:
1212:
1206:
1187:
1168:
1143:
1121:SandyGeorgia
1103:
1058:
1039:
1014:
993:
988:
963:
936:
918:
895:
877:
861:
857:
854:
839:
819:
802:
797:
787:
768:
750:
746:
732:Article talk
731:
730:
727:
708:
695:
678:
660:
622:
586:Project Talk
574:
555:
458:
405:WikiProjects
374:Good article
373:
359:
357:
348:
340:
306:
287:
247:
245:
241:please do so
229:
228:
224:
184:
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
1537:of it this
1302:this source
1300:Next, from
788:As part of
719:visual edit
148:free images
31:not a forum
2585:Categories
2524:Shearonink
2386:Shearonink
2360:Shearonink
2331:This-: -->
2124:Shearonink
2021:Shearonink
1909:Shearonink
1846:Shearonink
1811:Shearonink
1797:Shearonink
1764:Shearonink
1731:Shearonink
1726:everything
1688:Shearonink
1665:Shearonink
1599:Shearonink
1585:Shearonink
1548:Shearonink
1498:Shearonink
1478:sentences.
1434:Shearonink
1418:Shearonink
1366:Shearonink
1172:Shearonink
1129:Shearonink
1085:Shearonink
1043:Shearonink
999:Shearonink
941:Shearonink
898:Shearonink
884:Shearonink
866:Shearonink
843:Shearonink
828:Shearonink
822:under the
807:Shearonink
347:column on
235:under the
2353:MOS:RANGE
2322:This: -->
2116:citations
1941:CITATIONS
1929:necessary
1842:something
1414:japanning
1362:this edit
1222:content.
1079:query at
478:Biography
424:Biography
337:Main Page
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
2419:japanner
2182:Society.
2037:WP:WIAGA
1795:status.
1792:WP:DCGAR
1496:Thanks.
1310:Johnston
803:supposed
790:WP:DCGAR
395:GA-class
249:reassess
186:Archives
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
2497:Georgia
2477:Burgis.
2279:Georgia
2271:design.
2245:Georgia
2215:Georgia
2193:Georgia
2143:Georgia
2101:Georgia
2049:Georgia
1926:perhaps
1890:Georgia
1864:Georgia
1823:Georgia
1758:Thanks
1708:Georgia
1566:Georgia
1516:Georgia
1456:Georgia
1392:Georgia
1341:Georgia
1331:ah, ha
1318:Georgia
1306:Johnson
1285:Georgia
1262:Georgia
1243:Article
1228:Georgia
1207:Article
1191:Georgia
1147:Georgia
1107:Georgia
1062:Georgia
1018:Georgia
967:Georgia
922:Georgia
798:article
742:history
723:history
709:Article
625:on the
339:in the
272:Process
154:WP refs
142:scholar
2520:enough
2484:Fixed.
2351:. Per
2120:stated
1784:NOTICE
1654:inside
1308:, not
1249:Source
1213:Source
769:Result
591:Alerts
401:scale.
294:Listed
275:Result
126:Google
2494:Sandy
2333:: -->
2332:: -->
2324:: -->
2323:: -->
2276:Sandy
2242:Sandy
2212:Sandy
2190:Sandy
2140:Sandy
2098:Sandy
2073:oddly
2046:Sandy
1887:Sandy
1861:Sandy
1820:Sandy
1705:Sandy
1563:Sandy
1513:Sandy
1453:Sandy
1389:Sandy
1338:Sandy
1315:Sandy
1282:Sandy
1259:Sandy
1225:Sandy
1188:Sandy
1144:Sandy
1104:Sandy
1059:Sandy
1015:Sandy
989:82.9%
964:Sandy
919:Sandy
751:Watch
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
2556:talk
2542:talk
2528:talk
2502:Talk
2405:talk
2390:talk
2364:talk
2313:that
2308:that
2284:Talk
2250:Talk
2220:Talk
2198:Talk
2148:Talk
2128:talk
2118:are
2106:Talk
2054:Talk
2025:talk
1913:talk
1895:Talk
1882:Note
1869:Talk
1850:talk
1828:Talk
1801:talk
1768:talk
1750:talk
1735:talk
1713:Talk
1692:talk
1669:talk
1630:talk
1603:talk
1589:talk
1571:Talk
1552:talk
1521:Talk
1502:talk
1461:Talk
1438:talk
1422:talk
1397:Talk
1370:talk
1346:Talk
1323:Talk
1290:Talk
1267:Talk
1233:Talk
1196:Talk
1176:talk
1152:Talk
1133:talk
1112:Talk
1089:talk
1067:Talk
1047:talk
1023:Talk
1003:talk
972:Talk
945:talk
927:Talk
902:talk
888:talk
870:talk
847:talk
832:talk
811:talk
778:talk
738:edit
715:edit
467:and
313:Kept
269:Date
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
2504:)
2347:Re
2340:Re
2286:)
2252:)
2222:)
2200:)
2150:)
2108:)
2056:)
1897:)
1871:)
1830:)
1760:CMD
1746:CMD
1715:)
1684:CMD
1643:CMD
1626:CMD
1573:)
1535:all
1531:all
1523:)
1463:)
1399:)
1348:)
1325:)
1292:)
1269:)
1235:)
1198:)
1154:)
1114:)
1069:)
1025:)
994:all
974:)
929:)
862:not
617:Mid
176:TWL
2587::
2558:)
2544:)
2530:)
2407:)
2392:)
2366:)
2317:in
2130:)
2027:)
2008:is
1915:)
1852:)
1817:.
1803:)
1770:)
1752:)
1737:)
1694:)
1671:)
1632:)
1605:)
1591:)
1554:)
1504:)
1475:as
1440:)
1424:)
1410:is
1372:)
1364:.
1178:)
1135:)
1101:.
1091:)
1049:)
1005:)
947:)
937:so
904:)
890:)
872:)
858:is
849:)
834:)
813:)
780:)
761:•
755:•
740:|
721:|
717:|
515::
331:A
252:it
243:.
156:)
54:;
2554:(
2540:(
2526:(
2500:(
2403:(
2388:(
2362:(
2282:(
2248:(
2218:(
2196:(
2146:(
2126:(
2104:(
2052:(
2023:(
1911:(
1893:(
1867:(
1848:(
1826:(
1799:(
1766:(
1748:(
1733:(
1711:(
1690:(
1667:(
1660:.
1628:(
1601:(
1587:(
1569:(
1550:(
1519:(
1500:(
1459:(
1436:(
1420:(
1395:(
1368:(
1344:(
1321:(
1288:(
1265:(
1231:(
1194:(
1174:(
1150:(
1131:(
1110:(
1087:(
1065:(
1045:(
1021:(
1001:(
985:)
981:(
970:(
943:(
925:(
900:(
886:(
868:(
845:(
830:(
809:(
776:(
747:·
744:)
736:(
728:·
725:)
713:(
665:.
629:.
475:.
407:.
353:.
345:"
341:"
254:.
191:1
188::
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
