Knowledge

Talk:Three-man chess

Source 📝

871:, the original discussion on this, SMcCandlish wrote that "sources do not consistently capitalize them." Okay, sure, for sports / games / terms that aren't consistently capitalized, I agree that they they shouldn't be capitalized. But that needs to be shown on a case-by-case basis that capitalization is inconsistent or unclear. If 80% of sports/games are lowercase, what to do about the 20% that are consistently uppercased, like the Hearts example above? Lowercasing them as well by osmosis is clearly wrong. Anyway, checking, a huge number of these variants are sourced to David Pritchard's "Encyclopedia of Chess Variants" and thus not easily checkable, so it sounds like we should be asking what the usage is in that book and other reliable sources. 968:"Fischer-random" actually used to be called out in the lede, but that's just an alternative name that didn't catch on. The other sources you found are all really old and back before the variant was popularized, or are just descriptions rather than titles. When I went looking - cursorily, I could be wrong! - I was only looking at recent sources, e.g. do a normal Google search, and they universally used "Fischer Random Chess" (Or Chess960). This variant has gotten more publicity in the past 5 years than from 1995-2015 combined, so it's definitely a check the age of the sources matter. 923:. Checking sources for that, they generally just use "Fischer Random" in running text, but that's because it's obvious chess is being talked about. When Chess is mentioned, it's usually capitalized, but sometimes this is as part of a tournament name? I can't find any use of a lowercase chess, oddly enough. So for this more prominent variant, it tentatively looks like it might actually merit a capital C "chess". See 33: 867:, which is fine, but should be announced per canvassing concerns. As it happens, I suspect I might support many of these moves since "chess" is in fact usually lowercased in-line, but it should be on a case-by-case basis of the relevant sources, not from an unneeded style guideline that decrees the answer without even knowing anything about the subject. Note that in 535:, not a hyphen; its name means 'falcon and hunter chess' not 'hunter-of-falcons chess'. PS: after the move, the text will need to be cleaned up. Many of these articles are rampantly over-capitalizing other names, too, e.g "Three-Handed Xiangqi" (which is also capitalized in ways that we wouldn't even in a proper name, in which case it would be "Three-handed Xiangi"). 1136:, the remainder have now been dealt with. Two things to note: firstly, I've left any casing in references and external links as is as I'm on a metered connection at the moment and don't have the bandwidth to check all the sources, I'll leave that for someone who's able to check them. Secondly, there are still some pages not mentioned in the move discussion such as 85: 64: 607:(emphesiss mine). As can be seen, games don't need to be trademarked if the name is the proper name. I just checked one article's sources and they do use the capitalize version. Is there any evidence that these are not the proper names of these versions? Regardless, oppose the specific proposal of Triangular chess as I don't think it's sufficient here. -- 95: 497:
with virtually all the other game articles in the chess and related categories, and across games and sports categories generally. There's no evidence any of these are trademarked boardgame publications/products; they're simply chess variations, often with a known inventor. This isn't all of the game
899:
I picked one at random to look into and found on the original article the edit summary includes "(please note: the reason "Chess" is capitalized is because "Parallel Worlds Chess" is the game name/game title)". By a user who is currently blocked, it appears. I don't see any reason to suspect more
982:
This is likely another example of the unreasonable effectiveness of Knowledge. We had it capped since 2002, so everyone who looked it up and wrote about it in recent years was likely influenced by that. I'd say it makes more sense to look to sources from before WP published the capped version.
951: 1193:
are full of over-capitalization. And there are more chess variants still capped that were not listed in this RM discussion; and lots of capped alternative names. Are some of those trademarks, or proper names? Is anyone interested in trying to trying to compile a list of which ones should be
914:
Most of the current set of nominated articles appear to be obscure variants that should arguably be merged to a "List of chess variants" article anyway, so it's hard to say. The variant everyone has been talking about lately - which just had a technical move request, actually - is
947: 943: 863:. Note that GAMECAPS was apparently only created a year or so ago, long after these articles were originally created and titled by editors who presumably knew the domain and picked capital letters. Also note that this discussion was apparently linked on 812:. Some of it is certainly casual lack of attention to that detail, but I think a bigger factor is the mix of capitalizations found in the sources. Also sometimes caps are required as clearly "Losing Chess" and "losing chess" are not the same thing. ( 929:. I don't claim to be familiar with the other variants very well, although LukeSurl's source seems to capitalize them all for whatever reason. No opinion on if that's one source being odd or the general consensus of sources on the topic. 498:
articles that need over-capitalization cleanup, but might as well start with 25. The fact that games-focused writers love to captialize these things (and all other game-related terms) is irrelevant; it's just a
816:
is not currently listed in this RM.) The options are either to use caps always or to carefully consider each case. The example provided by the more numerous card games suggests considering individual cases.
560:—How on earth were these all capped for so long? Let me guess: someone capped a few, and the rest followed like copycats. Time to apply the WP MOSCAPS, Chicago MOS, and New Hart's Rules (Oxford). 528:
is an article on all chess variants that are triangular, so the one-game article would need to be disambiguated (or the more generic article moved to some other name). And
1265: 767:
per Luke and O. Yes, even Capablanca chess (which I find is more often "Capablanca's chess"); capped uses are most often "Capablance Chess Club", it looks like.
1032: 864: 840: 213: 954:
has "one of Fischer's ideas – Random Chess". There's not a lot of evidence for proper-name status; most of the sources that cap it cap everything chess related.
788:
seems to have been written by an incompetent. Standard usage that defies GAMECAPS decrees concerning correct capitalization of games are absurdly easy to find—
1172:
Thanks! I'm sure there will be a lot more tweaking needed, especially in links. But having the leads fixed will help move things in the right direction.
206:
nor prejudice against speedy renomination. Guideline based arguments support the move, should the discussion which has since been started about changing
885:
This is a particularly good venue for considering them one at a time, as we're doing. If you see some that you think are proper names, point them out.
524:(that is, the article is about the game rule-set, not about that particular published board-and-pieces package, which would not itself be notable). 1260: 151: 141: 629:
shows it to be a named game which isn't standard chess, as are many of the others. Have listed this RM at the Wikiproject Chess talk page.
186:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
1270: 499: 546: 1095:
The above RM was executed, but left lots of articles needing case fixes. I started working on them. More help would be welcome.
1044:
It seems to be working OK. I don't see a reason to think about making exceptions for games. For trademarked game names, we have
117: 1255: 518:
should not be capitalized in the article). But it's likely that the shown board game is a product produced long after the game
847:
here to ignore the style guide. If this happens, we should pause this discussion while the style guide discussion happens. --
44: 1160: 1121: 374: 370: 225: 108: 69: 715:
That's a reasonable point but I'm not sure if Three Kingdoms is a proper noun there, therefore neutral on that one.
764: 743: 699: 323: 198: 1069: 177: 924: 844: 264: 1137: 809: 749: 724: 667: 424: 309: 1155: 1141: 1116: 220: 1081: 1077: 543: 347: 343: 187: 50: 927: 1229: 920: 868: 634: 584: 507: 494: 401: 397: 32: 1031:
It seems like the MOS isn't working for this case. I've started a discussion towards amending this
789: 260: 190:
after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
116:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1237: 1218: 1199: 1177: 1100: 1053: 988: 973: 959: 934: 905: 890: 876: 805: 801: 772: 717: 660: 601:
Sports, games, and other activities that are not trademarked or copyrighted are not capitalized (
410: 406: 900:
than it's the name of a game; that is, nothing suggesting a reason to think it's a proper name.
808:
are other examples. There are probably several reasons for the mix of capitalizations found in
655: 383: 379: 510:
which appears to be an actual published, trademarked boardgame (though its generic names like
626: 612: 538: 525: 506:] says what it does (after a lengthy RfC on the issue). A possible counter-example would be 490: 419: 415: 392: 388: 305: 291: 287: 822: 797: 630: 580: 566: 246: 242: 703: 651: 439: 435: 1249: 1233: 1214: 1195: 1173: 1149: 1133: 1110: 1096: 1049: 1036: 1021: 984: 969: 955: 930: 901: 886: 872: 848: 768: 707: 686: 475: 471: 466: 462: 300: 296: 273: 269: 17: 1210: 1190: 1145: 836: 813: 785: 682: 596: 503: 486: 482: 457: 453: 356: 352: 338: 334: 207: 100: 608: 448: 444: 282: 278: 255: 251: 1113:, just noticed this, apologies, I'm about halfway through the ones remaining. 1009: 818: 561: 318: 314: 90: 210:
result in a change in the guideline, another move discussion can be opened.
365: 361: 1152:
may be of use as it has a built-in "what links here" option. Many thanks,
916: 532: 1241: 1222: 1203: 1181: 1167: 1128: 1104: 1057: 1039: 1024: 992: 977: 963: 938: 909: 894: 880: 851: 826: 776: 755: 730: 710: 689: 673: 638: 616: 588: 571: 551: 232: 793: 1213:. It could use more eyes to see if I went too far or not far enough. 1045: 84: 63: 1232:? Do we have to have the discussion over again, or can we fix it? 113: 94: 26: 1076:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this
650:
per nom, noting also that the French Knowledge article for
681:
per nom. This appears to be a correct implementation of
429: 328: 1068:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
112:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 792:provide many obvious examples. You can start with 1084:. No further edits should be made to this section. 1194:capped, so I don't go overboard in fixing them? 1006:The Classified Encyclopaedia of Chess Variants 865:Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style/Capital_letters 841:Knowledge talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters 861:Overturn GAMECAPS and renominate individually 8: 625:A good point to discuss, as a quick look at 519: 176:The following is a closed discussion of a 58: 1266:C-Class chess articles of Low-importance 1048:which says to cap them; otherwise, not. 603:except where one contains a proper name 60: 30: 600: 7: 195:The result of the move request was: 106:This article is within the scope of 49:It is of interest to the following 605:or acronym, or begins a sentence). 25: 946:it's "Fischer random chess", and 1012:. This capitalises fully (i.e. " 93: 83: 62: 31: 1209:I did a bunch of downcasing on 1148:which will need casing fixes. 1008:(2nd ed.) is available online: 146:This article has been rated as 579:per nom and welcome back SM. 214:closed by non-admin page mover 169:Requested move 28 October 2019 1: 1261:Low-importance chess articles 536: 197:Consensus to move all except 120:and see a list of open tasks. 1242:22:12, 6 November 2019 (UTC) 1223:18:57, 8 November 2019 (UTC) 1204:21:40, 6 November 2019 (UTC) 1182:18:04, 6 November 2019 (UTC) 1168:13:28, 6 November 2019 (UTC) 1129:13:08, 6 November 2019 (UTC) 1105:05:57, 6 November 2019 (UTC) 1058:04:49, 4 November 2019 (UTC) 1040:14:25, 30 October 2019 (UTC) 1025:08:52, 30 October 2019 (UTC) 993:19:35, 1 November 2019 (UTC) 978:06:39, 31 October 2019 (UTC) 964:02:20, 31 October 2019 (UTC) 939:22:11, 30 October 2019 (UTC) 910:04:02, 30 October 2019 (UTC) 895:03:52, 30 October 2019 (UTC) 881:23:10, 29 October 2019 (UTC) 852:08:43, 29 October 2019 (UTC) 827:03:40, 29 October 2019 (UTC) 777:02:22, 29 October 2019 (UTC) 756:02:11, 29 October 2019 (UTC) 731:09:11, 29 October 2019 (UTC) 711:16:07, 28 October 2019 (UTC) 690:16:06, 28 October 2019 (UTC) 674:12:51, 28 October 2019 (UTC) 639:10:09, 28 October 2019 (UTC) 617:09:48, 28 October 2019 (UTC) 589:09:19, 28 October 2019 (UTC) 572:06:00, 28 October 2019 (UTC) 552:05:17, 28 October 2019 (UTC) 500:WP:Specialized style fallacy 233:14:44, 5 November 2019 (UTC) 375:Chess on a really big board 371:Chess on a Really Big Board 126:Knowledge:WikiProject Chess 1287: 1271:WikiProject Chess articles 839:it should be discussed at 835:If there is an issue with 765:Game of the Three Kingdoms 744:Game of the Three Kingdoms 700:Game of the Three Kingdoms 329:Game of the three kingdoms 324:Game of the Three Kingdoms 199:Game of the three kingdoms 152:project's importance scale 129:Template:WikiProject Chess 145: 78: 57: 1074:Please do not modify it. 843:, rather than forming a 183:Please do not modify it. 1138:Template:Chess variants 1091:Case fixing help needed 810:Category:Chess variants 430:Capablanca random chess 425:Capablanca Random Chess 310:Triangular chess (game) 1256:C-Class chess articles 1142:List of chess variants 698:With the exception of 520: 202:, upon which there is 39:This article is rated 348:Parallel worlds chess 344:Parallel Worlds Chess 1230:Fischer Random Chess 1189:Also, articles like 921:Fischer Random Chess 763:– with exception of 508:Game of the Generals 402:Transcendental chess 398:Transcendental Chess 18:Talk:Three-Man Chess 1228:And what's up with 950:"Fischer-random". 533:requires an en dash 530:falcon–hunter chess 265:Falcon–hunter chess 261:Falcon-Hunter Chess 706:is capitalised. -- 411:Tutti-frutti chess 407:Tutti-Frutti Chess 45:content assessment 845:WP:LOCALCONSENSUS 656:Fr:Échecs avancĂ©s 217: 166: 165: 162: 161: 158: 157: 109:WikiProject Chess 16:(Redirected from 1278: 1165: 1163: 1158: 1126: 1124: 1119: 796:and progress to 752: 742:Move all except 727: 720: 670: 663: 627:Capablanca Chess 569: 550: 526:Triangular chess 523: 432: 420:Capablanca chess 416:Capablanca Chess 393:Wildebeest chess 389:Wildebeest Chess 384:Paulovits's game 380:Paulovits's Game 331: 306:Triangular Chess 292:Chancellor chess 288:Chancellor Chess 230: 228: 223: 211: 185: 134: 133: 130: 127: 124: 103: 98: 97: 87: 80: 79: 74: 66: 59: 42: 36: 35: 27: 21: 1286: 1285: 1281: 1280: 1279: 1277: 1276: 1275: 1246: 1245: 1161: 1156: 1154: 1122: 1117: 1115: 1093: 1088: 750: 725: 718: 668: 661: 567: 428: 327: 247:Three-man chess 243:Three-Man Chess 226: 221: 219: 181: 171: 131: 128: 125: 122: 121: 99: 92: 72: 43:on Knowledge's 40: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 1284: 1282: 1274: 1273: 1268: 1263: 1258: 1248: 1247: 1226: 1225: 1187: 1186: 1185: 1184: 1131: 1092: 1089: 1087: 1086: 1070:requested move 1064: 1063: 1062: 1061: 1060: 1029: 1028: 1027: 1003: 1002: 1001: 1000: 999: 998: 997: 996: 995: 897: 857: 856: 855: 854: 830: 829: 779: 758: 738: 737: 736: 735: 734: 733: 704:Three Kingdoms 693: 692: 676: 652:Advanced Chess 644: 643: 642: 641: 620: 619: 591: 574: 479: 478: 469: 460: 451: 442: 440:Advanced chess 436:Advanced Chess 433: 422: 413: 404: 395: 386: 377: 368: 359: 350: 341: 332: 321: 312: 303: 294: 285: 276: 267: 258: 249: 238: 236: 193: 192: 178:requested move 172: 170: 167: 164: 163: 160: 159: 156: 155: 148:Low-importance 144: 138: 137: 135: 132:chess articles 118:the discussion 105: 104: 88: 76: 75: 73:Low‑importance 67: 55: 54: 48: 37: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1283: 1272: 1269: 1267: 1264: 1262: 1259: 1257: 1254: 1253: 1251: 1244: 1243: 1239: 1235: 1231: 1224: 1220: 1216: 1212: 1208: 1207: 1206: 1205: 1201: 1197: 1192: 1183: 1179: 1175: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1166: 1164: 1159: 1151: 1147: 1143: 1139: 1135: 1132: 1130: 1127: 1125: 1120: 1112: 1109: 1108: 1107: 1106: 1102: 1098: 1090: 1085: 1083: 1079: 1075: 1071: 1066: 1065: 1059: 1055: 1051: 1047: 1043: 1042: 1041: 1038: 1034: 1030: 1026: 1023: 1019: 1015: 1011: 1007: 1004: 994: 990: 986: 981: 980: 979: 975: 971: 967: 966: 965: 961: 957: 953: 949: 945: 942: 941: 940: 936: 932: 928: 925: 922: 918: 913: 912: 911: 907: 903: 898: 896: 892: 888: 884: 883: 882: 878: 874: 870: 869:WP:SPORTSCAPS 866: 862: 859: 858: 853: 850: 846: 842: 838: 834: 833: 832: 831: 828: 824: 820: 815: 811: 807: 803: 799: 795: 791: 787: 783: 780: 778: 774: 770: 766: 762: 759: 757: 754: 753: 746: 745: 740: 739: 732: 728: 722: 721: 719:Crouch, Swale 714: 713: 712: 709: 705: 701: 697: 696: 695: 694: 691: 688: 684: 680: 677: 675: 671: 665: 664: 662:Crouch, Swale 657: 653: 649: 646: 645: 640: 636: 632: 628: 624: 623: 622: 621: 618: 614: 610: 606: 604: 598: 595: 592: 590: 586: 582: 578: 575: 573: 570: 565: 564: 559: 556: 555: 554: 553: 548: 545: 542: 541: 534: 531: 527: 522: 517: 513: 509: 505: 502:, and is why 501: 496: 495:WP:CONSISTENT 492: 488: 484: 477: 476:Masonic chess 473: 472:Masonic Chess 470: 468: 464: 461: 459: 455: 452: 450: 446: 443: 441: 437: 434: 431: 426: 423: 421: 417: 414: 412: 408: 405: 403: 399: 396: 394: 390: 387: 385: 381: 378: 376: 372: 369: 367: 363: 360: 358: 354: 351: 349: 345: 342: 340: 336: 333: 330: 325: 322: 320: 316: 313: 311: 307: 304: 302: 301:Rhombic chess 298: 297:Rhombic Chess 295: 293: 289: 286: 284: 280: 277: 275: 274:Hostage chess 271: 270:Hostage Chess 268: 266: 262: 259: 257: 253: 250: 248: 244: 241: 240: 239: 235: 234: 231: 229: 224: 215: 209: 205: 201: 200: 191: 189: 184: 179: 174: 173: 168: 153: 149: 143: 140: 139: 136: 119: 115: 111: 110: 102: 96: 91: 89: 86: 82: 81: 77: 71: 68: 65: 61: 56: 52: 46: 38: 34: 29: 28: 19: 1227: 1211:V. R. Parton 1191:V. R. Parton 1188: 1153: 1146:V. R. Parton 1114: 1094: 1073: 1067: 1017: 1013: 1005: 860: 837:MOS:GAMECAPS 814:Losing Chess 786:MOS:GAMECAPS 781: 760: 748: 741: 716: 683:MOS:GAMECAPS 678: 659: 647: 602: 597:MOS:GAMECAPS 593: 576: 562: 557: 539: 529: 515: 511: 504:MOS:GAMECAPS 493:, and to be 487:MOS:DOCTCAPS 483:MOS:GAMECAPS 480: 467:Balbo's game 463:Balbo's Game 458:Almost chess 454:Almost Chess 357:Double chess 353:Double Chess 339:Beirut chess 335:Beirut Chess 237: 218: 208:MOS:GAMECAPS 204:no consensus 203: 196: 194: 182: 175: 147: 107: 101:Chess portal 51:WikiProjects 1082:move review 747:per above. 540:SMcCandlish 449:Alice chess 445:Alice Chess 283:Cubic chess 279:Cubic Chess 256:Cross chess 252:Cross Chess 188:move review 1250:Categories 790:Card games 631:Randy Kryn 599:also says 581:Randy Kryn 319:Wolf chess 315:Wolf Chess 1078:talk page 491:WP:NCCAPS 366:Tri-chess 362:Tri-Chess 1234:Dicklyon 1215:Dicklyon 1196:Dicklyon 1174:Dicklyon 1134:Dicklyon 1111:Dicklyon 1097:Dicklyon 1080:or in a 1050:Dicklyon 1037:LukeSurl 1022:LukeSurl 1020:hess). - 1010:PDF here 985:Dicklyon 970:SnowFire 956:Dicklyon 952:This one 931:SnowFire 917:Chess960 902:Dicklyon 887:Dicklyon 873:SnowFire 849:LukeSurl 769:Dicklyon 708:LukeSurl 687:LukeSurl 594:Comment: 516:generals 512:salpakan 794:Go Fish 782:Comment 761:Support 679:Support 648:Support 577:Support 558:Support 150:on the 41:C-class 1162:(talk) 1123:(talk) 1046:MOS:TM 1016:osing 806:Spades 802:Hearts 751:O.N.R. 654:is at 609:Gonnym 568:(talk) 521:per se 481:– Per 227:(talk) 47:scale. 819:Quale 123:Chess 114:Chess 70:Chess 1238:talk 1219:talk 1200:talk 1178:talk 1157:SITH 1144:and 1118:SITH 1101:talk 1054:talk 1035:. -- 1033:here 989:talk 974:talk 960:talk 948:here 944:Here 935:talk 906:talk 891:talk 877:talk 823:talk 804:and 773:talk 726:talk 685:. -- 669:talk 635:talk 613:talk 585:talk 563:Tony 514:and 489:and 485:and 222:SITH 1150:AWB 800:. 798:War 729:) 702:as 672:) 549:đŸ˜Œ 142:Low 1252:: 1240:) 1221:) 1202:) 1180:) 1140:, 1103:) 1072:. 1056:) 991:) 976:) 962:) 937:) 926:, 919:/ 908:) 893:) 879:) 825:) 784:. 775:) 658:. 637:) 615:) 587:) 537:— 474:→ 465:→ 456:→ 447:→ 438:→ 427:→ 418:→ 409:→ 400:→ 391:→ 382:→ 373:→ 364:→ 355:→ 346:→ 337:→ 326:→ 317:→ 308:→ 299:→ 290:→ 281:→ 272:→ 263:→ 254:→ 245:→ 180:. 1236:( 1217:( 1198:( 1176:( 1099:( 1052:( 1018:C 1014:L 987:( 972:( 958:( 933:( 904:( 889:( 875:( 821:( 771:( 723:( 666:( 633:( 611:( 583:( 547:Âą 544:☏ 216:) 212:( 154:. 53:: 20:)

Index

Talk:Three-Man Chess

content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Chess
WikiProject icon
icon
Chess portal
WikiProject Chess
Chess
the discussion
Low
project's importance scale
requested move
move review
Game of the three kingdoms
MOS:GAMECAPS
closed by non-admin page mover
SITH
(talk)
14:44, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Three-Man Chess
Three-man chess
Cross Chess
Cross chess
Falcon-Hunter Chess
Falcon–hunter chess
Hostage Chess
Hostage chess

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑