151:
point is the same sort of thing... a point when suddenly everything changes and the properties become nonlinear. Well these phase transitions and tipping points are everywhere, and often accompany the "sudden" emergence of ordered systems from random systems. The crystalization of minerals, the formation of astronomical systems, the extinction of species, and perhaps even the first appearance of "life" are all such examples. The concept is quite fascinating and, it would seem, important to understanding the nature of the complexity we see in the fascinating world around us. If this sounds interesting, you might check out Stuart
Kauffman's
209:
many examples of bifurcations in economics that do not deserve articles on their own. If they existed I would agree with you to merge them or eliminate them altogether. Yet, it seems to me that "tipping point" as it relates to climate, at least in the popular media, gets a lot of airtime... I am not a sociologist so I do not know if the same is true for the sociological concept, but it looks like an article that may grow and merging it might just make things worst by taking away flow, coherence, and making it more like a list.
316:. Although also frequently used by climatologists, the "runaway effect" in complex systems has no climatology-specific meaning either, which is why "runaway greenhouse effect" is often used to clarify when the things aren't evident from the context. Complex systems have a lot to do with climatology, which is why you see so many of the same terms. "Tipping point" has also been used quite a few times in reference to the current presidential primary race for the US Democratic Party. Should we create a tipping point article for that?
299:
another editor using "tipping point" in nearly the exact opposite sense, in which the term referred to the point at which a confluence of human civic action succeeds in reversing environmental decline. In terms of specialization of meaning, there is little difference between "tipping point" and, say, "critical mass". If the climatologists decided to use the latter term to analogize things, I doubt that the same arguments would be made for "equal status".
258:) did feature some attempts to describe a general definition of the term, the climatology-related article makes no reference to the metaphor which it adopts. As I described in my previous comment, "tipping point" has particular meaning that is globally applied to the many areas for which it is used. Even a simple dictionary lookup results in "tipping point: the culmination of a build-up of small changes that effects a big change". With the exception of
327:
for those whose knowledge was based on the
Knowledge article, noone would use "angle of repose" to refer to a tipping point, especially in the other contexts. The word "repose" refers to stability, whereas "tipping point" refers to the threshold of instability. You state, that the original article "tries to combine many uses on to one page", yet it is still very much a short stub, with much need of improvement. The
22:
188:
the case, we would have separate tipping point articles for all those other uses mentioned, from economics to epidemiology to politics to who knows what else. If the main article needs to be generalized and balanced, that can be worked on, but I don't think this is an good solution. Information on a tipping point for global warming would be best covered through an addition to
71:
53:
379:
There's no harm in keeping this discussion open longer. I still disagree. I already expressed my opinion on the matter. I see no difference in meaning for the phrase itself. At this point, I see a somewhat vague and nebulous application of a popularized concept used to dress up an old idea, and would
271:
A tipping point is not a different concept in climatology than it is in sociology. The same phrase and concept is being used to describe different theories—theories that employ but do not define the concept of a tipping point. I already mentioned my concern that the sociological usage may be featured
426:
article and will hence take my leave. Feel free to remove the banners. I admit I am not an expert on global warming. I was basing my understanding of the climatology meaning on what Lumos3 wrote. I would've been much happier if someone could bring me around on this, explaining it so I could at least
187:
such as the Earth's climate or a particular social structure. Just because the original article is currently weighted heavily toward the sociological usage does not automatically mean that other common uses get their own article, especially when the concept is the essentially the same. If that were
326:
tipping point beyond which the pile becomes unstable, and liable to "tip", or collapse. It does not use the same metaphorical conception of "a solid object falling over", although that is literally the case. The terms are not interchangable, though, which is where I disagree with
Lowellian. Except
208:
I oppose this. It sounds like they are both just bifurcations, but merging them will inhibit the articles. I am sure much can be said about each topic, so merging them is not a good idea. Your point is understandable, but it really depends on how important each concept is on its own. There are
150:
For comparison, consider some of the recent work of the Santa Fe
Institute and others on the emergence of order and complexity in dense chaotic systems. A tipping point is rather like a social "phase transition". You're familiar with the phase transition of water, to become ice or steam. A tipping
568:
I don't see the need to argue this. The heading is "science" and everything there fits that closely enough. I've removed the sublists, and just left it flat, in the hope that might be acceptable. I also don't like the term tipping point, which is actually a very vague idea (at least as applied to
192:
or a related article, and linking back to a general "tipping point" article for information on the term. Given the relevance of the sociological usage to the term's entry into the common vocabulary, it would be appropriate to retain some mention, but specifics would probably best be redirected to
230:
for something similar to the everyday experience of a solid object falling over but they are describing different phenomona each of which deserve their own article. The various other uses , some of which are not notable enough for their own article should be described on the disambiguation page,
350:
Like any subject where there is a range of meaning there should be a disambiguation page that gives an overview of all the meanings and those that are too complex to explain in a couple of sentences in the disambiguation page should be expanded in their own articles. I would argue that "tipping
298:
The term "tipping point" does not in and of itself carry the specific meaning described in your article, such that the word can be merely mentioned to an environmental scientist and immediately be understood in the context of global warming. In fact, a while back I was contesting an article by
549:, which explains why many of these "tipping point" articles really have something in common besides the name. Since I now have a working definition with reference, I can start putting together a true article with sections pointing to the other tipping point articles. —
272:
too prominently in the lead of the original article. That can be fixed. There isn't actually that much there, and the problem is more of placement than anything. The term has been used by
Grodzins, Wolf, and Schelling to describe a characteristic of
145:
I've moved the material on
Gladwell's book to its own page, with some expansion and editing. I deleted the paragraph below, as it's very unencyclopaedic and doesn't help me understand what connection there is, if any, between the concepts.
331:
article, on the other hand, has much more content, covers a variety of different usages in more depth, and does a better job explicating the unifying idea, without having two rough stubs trying to do what a singular article could do better.
351:
point" has at least 2 usages which require an expanded article, those for the sociological and climate change. Particularly the usage in the climate change debate has now reached a level where it is common to speak of "The tipping point" (
321:
I accept there the original article confused different conceptions of the term. In the case of "angle of repose", "tipping point" actually is meant in a different sense. The angle of repose for a pile of granular material represents a
288:
to describe his own epidemiological take on social trends. None of those things define a tipping point, but along with climatology and the other uses, all have to do with a systems perspective. Explain the term's applicability in the
357:) , implying that it is an event of unique significance being spoken about. To try and do justice to each of the meanings in a single page I believe would make it over complex and confusing to the reader.
384:. Since your main concern seems to be for your particular article, and mine being the other, unless any objections are specifically raised in the next day, I will proceed to revise the page at
168:
climatology is the study of the atmosphere and sociology is the study oh human interaction. to merge these two articles would not make sense as they are on completely unrelated topics
427:
understand and accept any errors in my position, but I don't want to be any more of a nuisance when my concerns have obviously been rejected. I apologize for any inconvenience.
632:
be in alphabetical order unless there are different types of items, or there is a clear difference in frequency of use. Both of these occur in this disambiguation page. —
183:
Although climatology and sociology are different topics, the term "tipping point" is used the same way. It is a general term used to refer to an inflection point in a
308:
does not mean that usage of the term merits a separate article all for itself. Most of what you described in that article was already covered in the section of
585:
674:
97:
649:
459:
93:
78:
58:
614:
589:
532:
482:
645:
304:
Just because climatologists are using a currently fashionable buzzword (in the commonly understood sense, no less) to describe
574:
412:
232:
495:
Surely not. In any case, we could eliminate economics by using "quantitative sciences", except that that would eliminate
189:
33:
262:, that figurative definition informs the usage in all pages with name as listed on the disambiguation page, and per
570:
423:
408:
385:
255:
407:
Oppose. Not only are the two aras very different, in climatology it doesn't really mean what you think it means
83:
653:
463:
593:
536:
511:
The important thing is to gather those which fit under the definition at the top under that definition. The
486:
618:
546:
266:, an article about that meaning should be featured under the main title, rather than a disambiguation page.
157:
21:
636:
553:
519:
503:
380:
argue that any specialization of the phrase's meaning in the context of climate change is at the point of
263:
173:
39:
496:
281:
214:
628:
That's a good question. Why are you altering the order? There is a guideline that they should
633:
550:
516:
500:
432:
393:
337:
328:
309:
285:
198:
169:
388:
to better reflect the more generalized coverage of tipping point for which I am advocating.
362:
352:
240:
259:
355:
293:
article, but leave the details of the phenomena it is used for to the relevant articles.
210:
184:
668:
422:
Alright, then. I guess I have my objection. I won't go ahead with the changes to the
381:
290:
428:
389:
333:
273:
194:
444:
358:
277:
236:
474:
455:
569:
climate, which is why Lenton et al had to make up their "tipping elements")
512:
478:
227:
447:
657:
639:
622:
597:
578:
556:
540:
522:
506:
490:
467:
436:
416:
397:
366:
341:
244:
218:
202:
177:
70:
52:
15:
312:
to which you inexplicably added your tipping point paragraph
611:
609:
254:, and whereas the original article (which you moved to
88:
96:, where you can join the project or contribute to the
226:. Sociology and climatology both use the term as a
545:It's the start of gathering together the article
86:pages on Knowledge. If you wish to help, you can
76:This disambiguation page is within the scope of
608:Why is the order of the items being altered?
584:Looks like a clarity improvement. Thank you
8:
499:as well, which seems counterproductive. —
82:, an attempt to structure and organize all
19:
586:Special:Contributions/William M. Connolley
47:
92:attached to this talk page, or visit the
32:does not require a rating on Knowledge's
280:, by Granovetter to describe models of
49:
613:Is there a clear definitive wp rule?
7:
106:Knowledge:WikiProject Disambiguation
109:Template:WikiProject Disambiguation
38:It is of interest to the following
646:Special:Contributions/Arthur Rubin
14:
456:Mathmatics#Mathematics as science
675:WikiProject Disambiguation pages
644:You wouldn't be the one to ask,
69:
51:
20:
233:Tipping point (disambiguation)
1:
598:02:06, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
579:09:10, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
557:08:40, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
541:05:29, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
523:01:58, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
507:01:36, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
491:01:08, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
468:02:59, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
190:mitigation of global warming
515:definition doesn't fit. —
691:
437:02:37, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
417:20:28, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
398:15:47, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
367:08:27, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
79:WikiProject Disambiguation
658:03:37, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
424:tipping point (sociology)
386:tipping point (sociology)
342:17:28, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
256:tipping point (sociology)
245:09:52, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
219:05:32, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
203:01:02, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
178:00:42, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
160:19:45, 21 Apr 2004 (UTC)
64:
46:
640:09:12, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
623:23:48, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
547:tipping point (science)
153:At Home in the Universe
112:Disambiguation articles
458:as a starting point.
306:a pre-existing concept
284:, and by Gladwell in
571:William M. Connolley
497:planetary boundaries
409:William M. Connolley
282:collective behavior
164:Re-merge discussion
30:disambiguation page
477:is "science" then
34:content assessment
329:positive feedback
310:greenhouse effect
193:another article.
128:
127:
124:
123:
120:
119:
682:
250:Except it's the
158:Markalexander100
142:
141:
137:
114:
113:
110:
107:
104:
91:
73:
66:
65:
55:
48:
25:
24:
16:
690:
689:
685:
684:
683:
681:
680:
679:
665:
664:
606:
452:
264:WP:PRIMARYUSAGE
260:angle of repose
166:
143:
139:
135:
133:
132:
111:
108:
105:
102:
101:
87:
12:
11:
5:
688:
686:
678:
677:
667:
666:
663:
662:
661:
660:
650:99.181.143.128
605:
602:
601:
600:
566:
565:
564:
563:
562:
561:
560:
559:
509:
481:surely too.
460:99.181.131.214
451:
441:
440:
439:
405:
404:
403:
402:
401:
400:
372:
371:
370:
369:
345:
344:
318:
317:
301:
300:
295:
294:
268:
267:
206:
205:
185:complex system
165:
162:
131:
129:
126:
125:
122:
121:
118:
117:
115:
103:Disambiguation
84:disambiguation
74:
62:
61:
59:Disambiguation
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
687:
676:
673:
672:
670:
659:
655:
651:
647:
643:
642:
641:
638:
635:
631:
627:
626:
625:
624:
620:
616:
615:99.109.124.95
612:
610:
603:
599:
595:
591:
590:99.109.127.44
587:
583:
582:
581:
580:
576:
572:
558:
555:
552:
548:
544:
543:
542:
538:
534:
533:99.181.138.52
530:
526:
525:
524:
521:
518:
514:
510:
508:
505:
502:
498:
494:
493:
492:
488:
484:
483:99.181.130.94
480:
476:
472:
471:
470:
469:
465:
461:
457:
449:
446:
442:
438:
434:
430:
425:
421:
420:
419:
418:
414:
410:
399:
395:
391:
387:
383:
378:
377:
376:
375:
374:
373:
368:
364:
360:
356:
353:
349:
348:
347:
346:
343:
339:
335:
330:
325:
320:
319:
315:
311:
307:
303:
302:
297:
296:
292:
291:tipping point
287:
283:
279:
275:
270:
269:
265:
261:
257:
253:
252:same metaphor
249:
248:
247:
246:
242:
238:
234:
229:
225:
221:
220:
216:
212:
204:
200:
196:
191:
186:
182:
181:
180:
179:
175:
171:
163:
161:
159:
156:
152:
147:
138:
130:
116:
99:
95:
90:
89:edit the page
85:
81:
80:
75:
72:
68:
67:
63:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
31:
27:
23:
18:
17:
634:Arthur Rubin
629:
607:
567:
551:Arthur Rubin
528:
527:Why is that
517:Arthur Rubin
501:Arthur Rubin
453:
406:
323:
313:
305:
274:white flight
251:
223:
222:
207:
170:Thechemist21
167:
154:
149:
148:
144:
94:project page
77:
40:WikiProjects
29:
445:mathematics
278:segregation
475:mathmatics
450:or a tool?
314:at the top
98:discussion
630:generally
531:to you?
529:important
513:economics
479:economics
382:neologism
211:Brusegadi
669:Category
286:his book
228:metaphor
448:science
429:Dancter
390:Dancter
334:Dancter
324:literal
195:Dancter
637:(talk)
604:Order?
554:(talk)
520:(talk)
504:(talk)
359:Lumos3
237:Lumos3
224:Oppose
134:": -->
36:scale.
28:This
654:talk
619:talk
594:talk
575:talk
537:talk
487:talk
464:talk
454:See
433:talk
413:talk
394:talk
363:talk
338:talk
276:and
241:talk
215:talk
199:talk
174:talk
136:edit
648:.
588:.
473:If
443:Is
671::
656:)
621:)
596:)
577:)
539:)
489:)
466:)
435:)
415:)
396:)
365:)
354:,
340:)
243:)
235:.
217:)
201:)
176:)
652:(
617:(
592:(
573:(
535:(
485:(
462:(
431:(
411:(
392:(
361:(
336:(
239:(
213:(
197:(
172:(
155:.
140:]
100:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
