Knowledge

Talk:Tropical Storm Norma (2005)/GA1

Source 📝

368: 127: 113: 345: 331: 300: 276: 212: 198: 184: 237: 247: 252:
As I said before, there is some jargon, but it seems some things are missing. What caused the initial tropical disturbance to form? Why did it track the way it did? What allowed it to strengthen/weaken? Some of that may require research outside of the tropical cyclone
397:
Thanks for the review, HH; I'm back from my trip. Still just getting used to the prose and MOS of these hurricane articles, which to be honest is a little frustrating to figure out. The review is good, though - thanks for taking the time, I'll look over things.
132:
There is a good bit of jargon, and a few sentences left me scratching my head a bit. Some important meteorological terms aren't linked, which is a problem when the writing isn't clear. Here are some of the more confusing statements.
139:
One particularly well-defined vortex spun out of the southeast edge of the deep convection early on September 22 and spent most of the day traveling in a loop to the east of the convection
66: 373:
I was going to put it on hold, but the article hasn't been touched by the author in 22 days, and the author hasn't really even edited any other tropical cyclone articles. ♬♩
62: 47: 39: 91: 85: 323: 55: 17: 204: 153:. It also doesn't follow the MOS too well, as there is unit inconsistency, and also since all times are supposed to be in 32: 119: 379: 170: 406: 374: 413: 384: 313: 262: 399: 337: 190: 154: 74: 43: 236: 147:storm to increase in speed due to warmer waters 8: 322:(images are tagged and non-free images have 7: 317:, where possible and appropriate. 24: 366: 343: 329: 298: 274: 271:Fair representation without bias 245: 235: 210: 196: 182: 125: 111: 18:Talk:Tropical Storm Norma (2005) 246: 135:It traveled weakly in a circle 1: 414:18:53, 29 December 2008 (UTC) 385:19:09, 27 December 2008 (UTC) 367: 344: 330: 299: 275: 211: 197: 183: 126: 112: 432: 143:The formation strengthened 151:in a southwestern circle 141:in the first paragraph. 101:reasonably well written 336:(appropriate use with 311:It is illustrated by 263:neutral point of view 225:broad in its coverage 324:fair use rationales 166:factually accurate 382: 338:suitable captions 295:No edit wars etc. 423: 410: 403: 378: 370: 369: 347: 346: 333: 332: 302: 301: 278: 277: 249: 248: 239: 238: 214: 213: 200: 199: 191:reliable sources 186: 185: 129: 128: 115: 114: 79: 70: 51: 431: 430: 426: 425: 424: 422: 421: 420: 408: 401: 260:It follows the 232:(major aspects) 60: 37: 31: 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 429: 427: 419: 418: 417: 416: 392: 391: 390: 389: 388: 387: 354: 353: 352: 351: 350: 309: 308: 307: 306: 305: 285: 284: 283: 282: 281: 258: 257: 256: 255: 254: 221: 220: 219: 218: 217: 189:(citations to 162: 161: 160: 159: 158: 96: 95: 80: 28: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 428: 415: 412: 411: 405: 404: 396: 395: 394: 393: 386: 381: 376: 375:Hurricanehink 372: 371: 364: 361: 360: 358: 355: 349: 348: 341: 339: 327: 325: 319: 318: 316: 315: 310: 304: 303: 296: 293: 292: 290: 286: 280: 279: 272: 269: 268: 266: 264: 259: 251: 250: 243: 233: 229: 228: 226: 222: 216: 215: 208: 206: 194: 192: 180: 176: 175: 173: 172: 167: 163: 156: 152: 148: 144: 140: 137:in the lede. 136: 131: 130: 123: 121: 109: 105: 104: 102: 98: 97: 94:for criteria) 93: 89: 87: 83: 82: 81: 78: 77: 73: 68: 64: 59: 58: 54: 49: 45: 41: 36: 35: 26: 19: 407: 400: 362: 356: 335: 321: 312: 294: 288: 270: 261: 241: 231: 224: 202: 188: 179:(references) 178: 169: 165: 150: 146: 142: 138: 134: 117: 107: 100: 84: 75: 71: 57:Article talk 56: 52: 33: 30: 44:visual edit 171:verifiable 363:Pass/Fail 242:(focused) 27:GA Review 357:Overall 253:report. 108:(prose) 67:history 48:history 34:Article 314:images 289:stable 287:It is 265:policy 223:It is 164:It is 99:It is 88:review 402:Jamie 90:(see 76:Watch 16:< 380:talk 168:and 92:here 63:edit 40:edit 409:S93 155:UTC 120:MoS 383:) 365:: 359:: 342:: 334:b 328:: 320:a 297:: 291:. 273:: 267:. 244:: 240:b 234:: 230:a 227:. 209:: 205:OR 201:c 195:: 187:b 181:: 177:a 174:. 149:, 145:, 124:: 116:b 110:: 106:a 103:. 86:GA 65:| 46:| 42:| 377:( 340:) 326:) 207:) 203:( 193:) 157:. 122:) 118:( 72:· 69:) 61:( 53:· 50:) 38:(

Index

Talk:Tropical Storm Norma (2005)
Article
edit
visual edit
history
Article talk
edit
history
Watch
GA
here
MoS
UTC
verifiable
reliable sources
OR
neutral point of view
images
fair use rationales
suitable captions
Hurricanehink
talk
19:09, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
Jamie
S93
18:53, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.