379:
363:
335:
314:
290:
278:
257:
241:
229:
202:
400:
185:
141:
104:
71:
413:
For the most part, this looks like a very good article deserving of GA status. As a Utah resident, I believe this article accurately and thoroughly describes one of this state's major highways. When the above issues are cleared, please contact me on my talk page and I will happily resume the process.
438:
Thanks for the improvements. Despite this lack in the
History section, I believe this article is deserving of GA status. I will proceed to make the necessary changes. Congratulations to all involved editors.
115:"US-89 enters Utah inside the Glen Canyon National Recreation Area..." Perhaps add "from the south" or something similar; technically the highway enters and exits the state from the north and south.
57:
Note: "Done" and "Not done" status indicates whether an issue has been fixed. Once a particular issue has been addressed, editors are free to change this status and use this list as a checklist.
429:
It needs more details of the history, for instance the bypassing by I-70 in the Sevier Valley. I stopped work on it without finishing it, but will hopefully get back to it in the future. --
159:
357:
251:
98:
Breaking this section into sub-sections would be a good organizational touch; how this would be done is up to the editor(s).
295:
The level of detail on the Route summary is amazing, yet it doesn't list details to an overly exhaustive extent. Well done.
196:
17:
219:
127:
53:
I have reviewed this article, and have found just a few things which I think should be fixed, detailed here:
384:
The images on this article are also impressive. The inclusion of some of the Scenic Byways is a nice touch.
171:
This is not the final review; I am putting the nomination on hold so that the above issues may be fixed.
124:
349:
444:
419:
36:
163:
80:
I doubled the width of the red line; is it clearer now (and does it still need the caption)? --
304:
373:
448:
433:
423:
131:
84:
40:
440:
430:
415:
81:
47:
32:
155:
With these issues withstanding, I would rate this article in the following manner:
65:
The map could use a caption; it is a tad unclear at first which road is US-89.
372:
B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with
356:
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have
405:
As stated above, I'm putting the nomination on hold.
238:B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
190:I'll hold off here until above issues are fixed.
8:
123:- Hope I did some justice to this article.
7:
399:
311:Fair representation without bias:
184:
24:
398:
377:
361:
333:
312:
288:
276:
255:
239:
227:
200:
183:
139:
102:
69:
31:I plan to review this article.
1:
378:
362:
334:
313:
289:
277:
256:
240:
228:
201:
95:Route description section:
467:
449:19:06, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
226:A. References to sources:
169:
18:Talk:U.S. Route 89 in Utah
434:01:32, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
424:01:10, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
353:to illustrate the topic?
132:05:11, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
85:05:49, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
41:00:26, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
177:reasonably well written
46:Preliminary Review by
270:broad in its coverage
252:No original research
358:fair use rationales
332:No edit wars, etc:
275:A. Major aspects:
215:factually accurate
182:A. Prose quality:
374:suitable captions
458:
402:
401:
381:
380:
365:
364:
337:
336:
316:
315:
292:
291:
280:
279:
259:
258:
243:
242:
231:
230:
204:
203:
187:
186:
147:
143:
142:
110:
106:
105:
77:
73:
72:
466:
465:
461:
460:
459:
457:
456:
455:
140:
138:
103:
101:
70:
68:
51:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
464:
462:
454:
453:
452:
451:
441:Robert Skyhawk
416:Robert Skyhawk
411:
410:
409:
408:
407:
406:
397:Pass or Fail:
389:
388:
387:
386:
385:
370:
369:
368:
344:
343:
342:
341:
340:
323:
322:
321:
320:
319:
300:
299:
298:
297:
296:
285:
284:
283:
266:
265:
264:
263:
262:
248:
247:
246:
236:
235:
234:
211:
210:
209:
208:
207:
193:
192:
191:
153:
152:
151:
150:
149:
148:
136:
135:
134:
113:
112:
111:
93:
92:
91:
90:
89:
88:
87:
50:
48:Robert Skyhawk
44:
33:Robert Skyhawk
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
463:
450:
446:
442:
437:
436:
435:
432:
428:
427:
426:
425:
421:
417:
404:
403:
396:
395:
393:
390:
383:
382:
375:
371:
367:
366:
359:
355:
354:
352:
351:
345:
339:
338:
331:
330:
328:
324:
318:
317:
310:
309:
307:
306:
301:
294:
293:
286:
282:
281:
274:
273:
271:
267:
261:
260:
253:
249:
245:
244:
237:
233:
232:
225:
224:
222:
221:
216:
212:
206:
205:
198:
194:
189:
188:
181:
180:
178:
174:
173:
172:
168:
167:
165:
162:review – see
161:
156:
146:
137:
133:
129:
126:
122:
119:
118:
117:
116:
114:
109:
100:
99:
97:
96:
94:
86:
83:
79:
78:
76:
67:
66:
64:
63:
61:
60:
59:
58:
54:
49:
45:
43:
42:
38:
34:
26:
19:
412:
391:
347:
326:
303:
287:B. Focused:
269:
218:
214:
199:compliance:
176:
170:
166:for criteria
158:
157:
154:
144:
120:
107:
74:
56:
55:
52:
30:
220:verifiable
62:Infobox:
27:GA Review
348:contain
346:Does it
164:WP:WIAGA
392:Overall
305:neutral
350:images
327:stable
325:Is it
302:Is it
268:Is it
213:Is it
175:Is it
16:<
445:Talk
420:Talk
217:and
145:Done
121:Done
108:Done
75:Done
37:Talk
431:NE2
250:C.
197:MoS
195:B.
82:NE2
447:)
422:)
394::
376::
360::
329:?
308:?
272:?
254::
223:?
179:?
160:GA
130:—
39:)
443:(
418:(
128:L
125:C
35:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.