Knowledge

Talk:People Power Party (South Korea)

Source 📝

2992:. Simple: this party is more conservative than the LDP, and has an extreme aversion to communism. South Korea and Japan are one of the few developed and liberal democracies. None of these countries is more socially conservative, anti-communist than PPP, and reveals a blatant dislike of LGBT. While center-right parties in other developed countries oppose 'homosexual marriage', they do not oppose 'homosexual', and PPP is anti-feminist sentiment. PPP is similar to the far right in Europe, as the center-left media Hankyoreh pointed out on issues related to feminism. 1573:
journals in Korean, the reference used to conclude and label PPP are sheer opinions and what seems to be very biased view on the party. For example, Nathan Park of Foreign Policy belongs Far-Left ideology as well as NYT referenced for their Ideology. I have yet to find PPP officially expressing anti stands on any of the social issues pertaining to the current political environment. I humbly ask you to revise anti-feminism to Pro-Woman or remove anti-feminism at all as references are inaccurate. Also the Party does not invade human rights issues on LGBTQ.
2586:
you agree? In addition, you have disagreed with the Liberty Korea Party's political position in the past as "right-wing," argued that the LKP should be described as "right-wing to far-right," and led to actual agreement. Is there any evidence that PPP is much more moderate than LKP? Once again, I can see that there is no consensus among users that PPP is center-right, and many reliable sources indicate that the party is more often portrayed as right-wing than it is.
531: 392: 365: 1443:
pointing out the nationalist tendencies of the conservative forces in Korea. What is certain is that liberals, not conservatives, tend to be closer to "Korean nationalism" in South Korea. (In terms of political views between North Korea and South Korea, not issues such as immigration or multiculturalism.) If I had to explain all of this and find a paper and quote it, it would be a very meaningless wasteful argument.--
402: 337: 521: 500: 614: 215: 267: 246: 468: 1335:. The United Future Party has not been long since it was founded, and Korean political forces often classify it as a faction, which is not well described as ideology. Also, the party's main predecessor, the LKP and Future 4.0, showed a tendency toward national conservatism. However, populism is controversial, so I will remove it from the infobox.-- 670: 3423:
In regards to your first point, this is your stated opinion. It may well be the right. How correct or not the statement is is not what is being discussed. The issue is whether the person is using the term "hawk" in this context as a shorthand for the term "war hawk", of which I can see no reason (nor
1100:
I'm changing my stance on this issue to support listing the UFP as purely "right-wing". Although the party has been described as center-right and is the successor to a line of center-right to right-wing parties, it has also been described as far-right and does include far-right members. Additionally,
698:
First of all, I respect all rules of Knowledge and loves it. However it sounds SAMSUNG also needs to gain consenseus to correct wrong information of itself. I see. But UFP can mention officially that the current information in English on Knowledge is not correct. Officially UFP uses the term Chairman
2629:
Japan's Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) is also classified as right-wing in the English version. Judging from this standard, People Power Party (PPP) is clearly more right than the Liberal Democratic Party, so it should be classified as right-wing. If PPP is classified as centre-right, of course, LDP
2585:
The party is described as right-wing in an overwhelming number of sources, even if there are a few sources to believe that the PPP is centre-right. If PPP is a right-of-center logic, there is a reliable source describing Japan's LDP as a right-of-center party, so it should be viewed the same way. Do
1912:
In addition, the people's power is now on a path to moderate after the election of a new party leader, but the extreme internal factions are still intact. It is a sufficiently extreme neoliberal ideology that is close to the far-right political position) and made remarks as if defending the election
1464:
I won't question what you've said about nationalism's place in the liberal and conservative political camps in South Korea; what you've written pretty much aligns with some of the stuff I've read. However, I think that listing the UFP with the ideology of "national conservatism" would still count as
1397:
It is the source of the description of LPK as a nationalist party. However, the reason why I wrote "national conservatism" is because in South Korean politics, "Korean nationalism" is often used as an investigation to refer to those who are negative to foreign forces, including the U.S., and who are
1082:
I added 'extreme right wing' to the infobox of the UFP. The UFP has an absolute majority of politicians affiliated with the LKP, who were virtually "Right-wing to far-right". The UFP has anti-socialism tendencies and is extremely hostile to sexual minorities, socially conservative and very strong in
3510:
policy, so I deleted it. Secondly, I enhanced the neutral description of the party in the introduction of the article. The word "conservative party" was already mentioned in the infobox, so I deleted it from the introduction to maintain the neutrality of the article. If there are any issues with my
2788:
I agree to express the political position of the People's Power Party as a simple right wing and write "center right" to "far right" in internal factions. The power of the people was moving in a relatively moderate direction after the election of the moderate party leader in the past, but after the
2600:
Fidesz, Law and Justice, and Japan's LDP are also described as center-right in many reliable sources. The same is true of the GOP in the United States. I would rather suggest removing the political position of the PPP. Once again, you cannot deny that even if you look for many reliable sources, PPP
1644:
Mainstream politicians in PPP oppose feminism. The same goes for Yoon, the presidential candidate, and Lee, the current party leader. You are generalizing very few cases as if they were mainstream opinions. And Knowledge has marked the ideology of many party articles as social conservatism based on
1442:
The reason why I use the term "national conservatism," not "Korean nationalism," is that "nationalism", which appears in Korea's conservative forces, including the UFP, is closer to "South Korean nationalism" with exclusive tendencies than "Korean nationalism." You can find some papers and articles
645:
This is the international relations bureau of the United Future Party that means has a right to confirm official information in English. ID jeff6045 is continually posting some wrong information and has not allowed edition. Officially UFP uses the term Chairman and Floor leader not the President or
2269:
Super-expensive houses have become a major issue in South Korea’s tight presidential election, which takes place on March 9th. The two front-runners—Lee Jae-myung, of the ruling Minjoo Party, and Yoon Seok-youl, of the centre-right People Power Party—have clashed over housing policy throughout the
2221:
Super-expensive houses have become a major issue in South Korea’s tight presidential election, which takes place on March 9th. The two front-runners—Lee Jae-myung, of the ruling Minjoo Party, and Yoon Seok-youl, of the centre-right People Power Party—have clashed over housing policy throughout the
918:
I'm going to object, only because the party was created out of a merger between mostly the Liberty Korea Party and other smaller conservative parties, and before the merger, none of them appeared to be described as "centre-right." Their ideology doesn't appear to have moderated any amount from the
3667:
Social democracy can involve social justice, but it doesn't have to, its primarily an economic ideology. As demonstrated a party can differ on its economic and social views. I think its therefore beneficial to include both and maintain the infobox as it currently stands to clarify where the party
3433:
In regards to the second, the origins of a term fiscal conservatism don't matter, what matters is whether or not this party is referred to as this by reliable sources, and we have one that says as much. Also, having economic liberalism in the infobox doesn't make this redundant. You yourself said
1808:
When I looked at the data that 'claimed' that the people's power was evaluated as center-right, there was only an expression that it was more moderate than in the past, but there was no expression of center-right. If so, I think the right-wing to far-right evaluation is correct, as there are only
3223:
PPP is now consistently conservative. However, during the Grand National Party (한나라당), there were also culturally moderate-to-liberal members. In the 2020s, a cultural war began in South Korean politics. Exactly a 15 years ago, however, the main issue of South Korea's main conservatives and main
2710:
I don't think it was rude to you. You're the only one in the talk who doesn't agree that PPP is a "right-wing", and the long-held political position in the article was also a "right-wing". Therefore, if there is no agreement in Talk that PPP is "centre-right," it should never be reflected in the
2478:
The ip above is my ip. Even relatively moderate politicians within the PPP are extremely hostile to LGBT rights. Lee Joon-seok, a former leader, even had controversy over his hatred of the disabled, and there is a negative position on feminism as a whole. This is not a political position to call
1989:
The power of the people was evaluated as “right wing” or “far-right”, never as a center-right wing. So, let's evaluate it as right-wing to far-right. If you are opposed to the right-wing perspective, I would like you to prove that there is a serious problem with the credibility of media articles
1770:
You are constantly stating your subjective views without any source, so please present a credible media that classifies the PPP as a far-right party. The parties classified as far-right parties in English Knowledge include France's National Rally, Germany's AfD, and Hungary's Fidesz, etc. Do you
3505:
After deleting a significant amount of information from the article, I wanted to post an explanation to prevent some users from misunderstanding it as vandalism. Firstly, I edited the section on the party's ideology. The source that was cited to describe the party as right-wing populist did not
1692:
This is just a pun. European far-right populist parties are also considered far-right because the mainstream forces of the party have such a tendency, even if they do not put forward far-right ideologies at the party level. Now, many other major politicians, including PPP party representatives,
1572:
Hi, I am Korean-American living in State of Washington. I have read and done in-depth research on People’s Power Party of Republic of Korea. I have found discrepancy on some of the information represented on this site. I did not find PPP is Anti-Feminism on any of their interviews, website, and
3526:
I will insist on maintaining the original narrative. The original description described the party as simple conservative, not conservative and right-wing populism. (in the description above) The part is modified, but the principle is to maintain the ideology and internal faction that have been
1427:
To be more accurate, it is extremely rare in the first place to describe South Korea's political parties with ideological term frequently used in Western politics, such as "liberal conservatism," "conservative liberalism," "national conservatism," "social democracy," and "social liberalism."
2570:
There is no reason to remove party’s political spectrum. The reason why I removed Democratic party’s political spectrum is that the party has been described as both centrist and left-wing. However People Power party has been described as center-right or right-wing by reliable sources. Only
1897:
There is practically no data evaluating ppp as a center-right winger. I think Nation is neutral and trustworthy. Even though both the Korean and foreign media, which evaluated the power of the people as far-right, were presented, I cannot agree to the continued opposition without evidence.
3640:
However, social democracy relates to social justice and economics, social conservatism relates to social issues, like abortion, LGBT rights and others. We currently have social conservatism, which isn't needed, as we already have national conservatism, which the former is a part of.
2516:
The 'diplomat' source you presented does not directly portray the party as a center-right. And the far-right nature of PPP has been mentioned in the Hankyoreh and The Nation. "Centre-right" is not agreed at all, so the political position should remain the status quo as the existing
2644:
I agree with you. If the LDP is not center-right, PPP is even more not center-right. Currently, Jeff6045 is the only one who claims that PPP is "centre-right" in this debate. Therefore, we will remove the phrase written on the center-right and restore it to its existing political
2673:
Don't play with words. Lazt9312 agreed that the PPP's political position is right-wing, and 769 haas says it is more right-wing than the LDP at all. Jeff6045 is the only one in this debate who doesn't agree that PPP is simply a "Right-wing" You shouldn't cause any more editorial
1716:
The current PPP government does not fall under the anti-globalization ideology, which is the main identity of the far-right in Europe, as well as the establishment of the immigration office. Also, PPP leader Lee Jun-seok has expressed a favorable position on homosexuality.
801:, with the source being the above link, be stated as the position until other sources counterclaiming such are provided (if any). If no opposition backed by reliable sources is stated within the next few days, I will assume no disagreement and will place it in the article. 1945:
The PPP is also a member of the IDU, an international coalition of centre-right parties to which the German CDU and the British Conservative Party belong. Therefore, the view that the PPP is a centre-right party seems more persuasive than that it is a far-right party.
2185:
When I read the article, I didn't see the term "center-right". There is no expression of center-right in the articles you have presented as a basis. Therefore, there are only claims of the far-right and the right-wing, so there is no choice but to be right-wing or
3434:
while they overlap, they’re not the same. They are significantly different enough to have their own separate Knowledge pages, rather than one be a section on the others page. I don't see how adding this one ideology makes the infobox any more difficult to read.
2892:
This user has a history of deleting the center-right classification from the LDP(Japan) document and fixing it as right-wing. Conversely, in this document, he deletes right-wing classification and try to fix it as the center-right. It seems very contradictory.
2443:
PPP has overwhelmingly more views on the right than views on the center-right, and far-right controversy exists. However, considering that South Korea is practically a two-party system, it is better to eliminate the dispute by removing its political position.
1311:
Cited sources only provide the definition of a conservative political party. Other ideologies, such as right-wing populism and national conservatism, lack any reliable source. These uncited ideologies should be excluded until a reliable source can be found.
1932:
The Nation itself is basically a magazine with a progressive bias, but even the author of the article you presented is a person who has appeared on South Korea's extreme left-wing broadcaster TBS, and it is difficult to acknowledge the credibility of the
1755:
Please do not arbitrarily interpret your remarks. Based on the article, articles that view the right wing are the mainstream, and there are often articles that view them as far-right and center-right. Therefore, I ask you to write as a simple right wing.
1083:
defending the Park Chung-hee administration in the past. That is why the UFP is often perceived as a hard-line right-wing party in Korea, and its far-right political stance is also included in the document of the UFP with the Korean-language Knowledge.--
2070:
Your claiming that the PPP is a far-right party comes from articles written by biased media, and if you want to stick with that argument, you must also agree with the credibility of my source, which describes the Democrats as a 'far-left communist
2571:
left-leaning newspapers have criticized party’s hard right faction. If you want to change party’s political spectrum please make consensus with numerous wiki users and provide reliable sources that party is far from center-right. Thank you.
1412:
In addition, the UFP has taken nationalistic views on many issues, but I am not good at English, so I have not written them down in detail. For now, there is little disagreement among South Koreans that the UFP is a "national conservatism"
3404:
Fiscal conservatism is an American term, and it is not used much in South Korea. There is redundancy because "Economic liberalism" and "Conservatism" are written in infobox. There is no need to write too much ideology in infobox.
1793:
I do not view the People's Power as a simple far-right party, nor do I see it as a center-right party. Since there are both extreme right-wing media data and center-right media data, let's evaluate it as a simple right-wing one.
177: 941:
Assent to HapHaxion's input. It is hard to define the party as centre right with just on source frome chinese media. Also as South korean, the party is considered as hard right in South Korean politics rather than centre-right.
792:
I did some research and the above link seems to be the only source concretely and explicitly stating a political position. If no one opposes, and since it is fairly similar to that of the position of the predecessor party, the
2725:
Even if Lazt9312 has agreed to your input it is enough to change party's political position. We need more debate with multiple wiki users. Also it seems that Lazt9312 has failed to make concenus with other wiki users.
2463:
As seen in the dispute above in Talk, it is not a widely accepted view that PPP is center-right. I'm an IP user, so I won't be able to participate, but I thought I needed a vote on whether the PPP was Centre-Right.--
3462:
There was once a time when too much ideology was added to infobox. Therefore, I think it is appropriate to maintain the status quo. And there is only one source in the article that supports "fiscal conservatism".
1942:
Also, neoliberalism is not far-right politics. Far-right politics in the 21st century is an ideology based on ultranationalism and anti-globalization, and it is correct to view it as the opposite of neoliberalism.
2915:
As for the political position of PPP, no satisfactory conclusions are drawn. When no conclusion is reached, it is better to make a majority decision. Please mention a political position in which each agrees.
1974:
Since you keep repeating your far-left arguments, I'm not sure I can reach an agreement, so I'll just wait for new people to join the discussion. It seems difficult for the two of us to come to an agreement.
2479:
center-right in Europe or the United States. As South Korea's low birth rate became serious, PPP shifted to a moderate position in immigration policy, but I understand that other editors agreed that the
3386:
The DPK is a hawk in the sense that it has a strong foreign policy against Japan. However, both South Korea and Japan are allies of the United States, and the DPK does not in itself attempt to go to
2502:
Sources about centre-right are reliable. Also they are directly describing the party as cnetre-right. I think there is no problem to portray party's political spectrum as centre-right to right-wing.
2254:
I'll try to invite some users to this talk page. (WP:DR) Please do not change the party's ideology or political spectrum without any further discussion on the talk page and keep WP:COV and WP:NPOV
2464: 2206:
The Economist article clearly states that the PPP is centre-right. Did you check correctly? If you insist that it is not written even though it is written, how are we going to have a discussion?
3167:
I believe there is a point to that. Historically, the main factor in dividing conservative and liberal in South Korea has been the perspective of North Korea, and it is still partially valid.
2449: 1613:
If PPP cannot describe PPP as "social conservatism" in the infobox because there is no source of "social conservatism", then "anti-LGBT" and "ant-feminism" should be described in the infobox.
1260: 3153:
Though the reason why "(South Korean)" is there denotes that, yes the ideology has a long history, but that it differs from other countries, otherwise there would be no point in having it.
2855:
are cited to describe party's right-wing position. I want to remove right-wing from party's political spectrum uless there are other reliable sources that describe the party as right-wing.
2189:
Also, please go to that document for information related to the Korean Democratic Party (and separate "articles" and "columns"). The claim that the Korean media is biased is not persuasive.
3328:"There are speculations that the party is willing to form an electoral alliance with the minor opposition party in the 2021 by-elections.". This sentence should be updated to present day. 2036:
Since you are repeating the same argument without rebutting what I pointed out, I do not see any reason to give an answer at this time. I will wait for more people to join the discussion.
1629:
If PPP does not bring the stated grounds that it is a social conservative party, it is an independent description. There are several politicians in the PPP who claim to be feminists. --
171: 68: 1960:
I don't know what TBS is, but I've heard that the media environment in Korea is conservative. If there is any material that evaluated TBS as a far-left press, I would appreciate it.
3006:
Originally, he insisted on a simple right-wing position, but now the PPP is in a situation where the influence of moderates has been extremely reduced, so right-wing to far-right.
3548: 1659:
What is certain is that PPP is anti-feminism because there have been several reports in the media called "anti-feminism." PPP's position on feminism is clearly not moderate.--
2056:
After all, there is a right-wing or far-right rationale right now, but the conclusion has no choice but to come out as a simple right-wing or right-to-extreme right anyway.
1879:
There are various political positions in the PPP. Centre-right to right-wing politics are representative, but there are also opinions that the PPP has far-right politics.
3760: 482: 2742:
In addition party's political position was already agreed as centre-right to right-wing. But one ip user had deleted centre-right content without making any consensus.
876:
I found this source describing the party as "centre-right". It seems pretty difficult to find sources placing this party on the political spectrum, since it is so new.
477: 375: 1398:
favorable to active dialogue with North Korea. The LKP and the UFP are not active in unifying North Korea and have shown a tendency to be hostile toward the North.--
3735: 2453: 317: 3615: 2050:
If you do not present an article that clearly expresses the power of the people as "center-right" rather than your own, I cannot agree with the debater's argument.
841:
We should delay placing the party's political spectrum until the general election. Before that, I think it would be a very controversial issue with other editors.
3780: 3765: 2274:
Are you arguing that there is no center-right phrase even though it is clearly stated in the article? Are you really willing to discuss and come to an agreement?
2226:
Are you arguing that there is no center-right phrase even though it is clearly stated in the article? Are you really willing to discuss and come to an agreement?
577: 587: 3566:
Are they needed? Other ideologies cover them to a certain extent, and not all ideologies are needed in the infobox, as it is to summerise, not to be explicit.
1936:
You should present specific examples of the PPP's far-right politics, not just the arguments of biased people who brand the PPP as far-right without context.
1611:
The fact that PPP is not "social conservatism" is just a far-right OR-based pun. It is also shown in the article that PPP opposes LGBT rights and feminism.
2688:
I think you just don't know how to make conseneus with other wiki users. Also your attitude seems quite rude to me. Please be civil. I suggest you to read
3367:. I'm not sure why you have a problem with having fiscal conservativism in the infobox when it’s supported by a citation. Also, a hawk is in reference to 2192:
Rather, I heard that the top three Korean media outlets and about 70% of the top 10 media outlets are similar to Fox News (conservative media in the US).
1939:
And it's the first time I've ever heard the opinion that repealing the inheritance tax is far-right politics. Inheritance tax is also abolished in Sweden.
3785: 3750: 448: 346: 103: 3105:
Are they needed in the "Ideology" parametre? The reason being that both are intrinsically linked to the conservatism that has developed in South Korea.
2084:
I would like to make it clear that only reports from neutral English-speaking media that have no interest in Korean politics should be used as sources.
699:
and Floor leader not the President or Parliamentary leader. And UFP is a member of IDU and APDU that can be a member to Center-right parties. Source? :
3755: 1216:
As the National Power document has been changed, I will change this document as well. If you have any objections, please do not hesitate to discuss.
458: 2970: 2948: 285: 2774:
You should at least provide reliable sources that describe the party as right-wing. Currently there are no reliable sources supporting your claim.
991:
I would be open to putting the political position as "right-wing", anyway. I don't think there's any controversy that it can be described that way.
3730: 2162: 718: 553: 1156: 3775: 3770: 327: 2111:, some say that it is inevitable for Lee to face obstacles not only from progressives, but also from his supporters and his party’s lawmakers. 2448:
Let's not describe the political position in the infobox of the article. This proposal may be the best alternative to satisfy many editors.--
2275: 2255: 2227: 2207: 2037: 1976: 1947: 1884: 1841: 1772: 778: 192: 109: 3081:
as to what an article should say, preferably based in Knowledge guidelines. The article should refer to this party as what most independent
1526:
There has been a lot of controversies about PPP's ideology and politocal spectrum spectrum. Therefore, I would like to suggest a solution.
1372:'s page doesn't explicitly label the party as "national-conservative" (if it does, please tell me where), which also counts as synthesis or 1722: 1253: 159: 3009:
After writing with , it is better to write the center-right wing as an internal faction (since there are moderates such as Yoo Seung-min).
1061:
I am not opposed to adding only 'Right-wing' to the infobox. I just added it. However, I am a little concerned about editorial disputes.--
3610:
I think the infobox should be kept as it is. I don't think 5 ideologies is an overload and is perfectly readable. While these ideologies
3740: 2172: 2143: 2085: 1840:
Tim Sherlock is hardly an objective observer, and you keep citing progressive media such as Pressian, which is difficult to agree with.
424: 3745: 3618:
for example, who are both socially conservative but also advocate social democracy, which is very different from fiscal conservatism.
2944: 2468: 2098: 544: 505: 2288:
It is my mistake to judge wrong. I will accept the argument that the power of the people should be evaluated as a simple right wing.
2873: 1737:
Christianday is a media that supports cultural Marxist conspiracy theories, and it is not a mainstream media and cannot be trusted.
646:
Parliamentary leader. And UFP is a member of IDU and APDU that can be a member to Center-right parties. If someone has a question,
1448: 1433: 1418: 1403: 1340: 1088: 1066: 975: 961: 860: 832: 2756:
Why do you skip 769haas? No one agrees with you. Also, UFP and PPP are legally the same parties and ideologically no difference.
2127: 289: 48: 153: 3552: 1360:, considering that even "conservatism" needs to be cited. Additionally, although you describe the party's main predecessors as 1017: 931: 813: 123: 54: 1713:
You are repeating the claim that the PPP is a far-right party. I'm curious what you think the standards of the far-right are.
1039:, do you have any objection to listing the party's political position as "right-wing"? If not, we can add it to the infobox. 415: 370: 293: 128: 44: 3295: 3266:
Also disagree with removing this. Why was this discussion not started in the correct place at the bottom of the talk page?
2302:
Then, it would be good to combine the opinion of the panelist with my opinion and do the following for the spectrum of ppp.
149: 3703: 3646: 3597: 3571: 3348: 3243: 3214: 3186: 3158: 3129: 3110: 1591:
Is there any evidence that Nathan Park is "far left"? It is an objective fact that PPP is hostile to LGBT and feminism. --
98: 2396: 2123: 2115: 1512: 1297: 1268: 226: 3668:
stands economically and socially. I therefore still stand by the view of maintaining the current state of the infobox.
3139:
Opposition. I think it should be reserved for readers who don't know if it's the main element of Korean conservatism.
1459: 1444: 1429: 1414: 1399: 1351: 1336: 1084: 1062: 1036: 986: 971: 957: 897: 856: 828: 714: 657: 274: 251: 199: 89: 2864: 1497:
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
1282:
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
855:
I'll agree with you for now. I will not display the spectrum of the political parties until the general elections.--
2135: 2131: 1913:
fraud conspiracy theory. Therefore, I propose to establish the political position of the people's power as follows.
2259: 2041: 1980: 1951: 1888: 1845: 782: 3699: 3642: 3593: 3567: 3344: 3239: 3210: 3182: 3154: 3125: 3106: 2423: 2279: 2231: 2211: 2163:
https://www.economist.com/finance-and-economics/2022/03/05/south-koreas-economy-threatens-to-become-like-japans
1776: 1161: 1739:
PPP supports a position close to the Far right (at least by US or European standards) on many social issues.--
1726: 2413: 2403: 2176: 2147: 2089: 1501: 1249:
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
1508: 1293: 1264: 744: 710: 653: 620: 165: 133: 1578: 3486: 3468: 3453: 3410: 3395: 3229: 3200: 3172: 3144: 2997: 2966: 2940: 2761: 2716: 2679: 2650: 2606: 2591: 2561: 2546: 2522: 2488: 1744: 1317: 3481:
I support Helper201's view of putting both 'fiscal conservatism' and 'economic liberalism' into infobox.
1816: 1558: 1544: 1469:, so I would strongly prefer that a source that explicitly calls the UFP national-conservative be found. 1286: 1235: 1221: 1177: 3224:
liberals was North Korea, while other issues were not subjects for dividing conservatives and liberals.
1361: 232: 1916: 1574: 3448:
There is no term 'hawk' in the source in the first place. The term should be changed to 'hard-line'.
3032: 2932: 706: 3669: 3619: 3583: 3435: 3372: 3267: 2789:
ouster of the party leader, it is moving again in the radical direction of the Liberty Korea Party.
2615:
It is written as a simple right wing and I think it should be written as center-right to far-right.
1615:
Obviously, PPP is directly referred to as "anti-feminism" from the source written in the article. --
1554: 1540: 1231: 1217: 214: 3673: 3623: 3439: 3376: 3271: 3078: 3037: 2480: 2139: 2099:
https://thediplomat.com/2021/07/can-a-36-year-old-leader-transform-south-koreas-conservative-party/
1678: 1630: 1369: 1013: 927: 809: 794: 624: 536: 185: 79: 3329: 2894: 2631: 2317:(There is a similar example in the Japanese Liberal Democratic Party article on Korean Knowledge) 2122:(as well as some further right-wing) political parties – including the UK Conservative Party, the 1990:
claiming the far-right or bring an article that evaluates the power of the people as center-right.
552:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
423:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
3532: 3516: 3074: 3057: 3023: 2883: 2874:
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/30/opinion/international-world/korea-emoji-feminism-misogyny.html
2860: 2808: 2794: 2779: 2747: 2731: 2701: 2664: 2620: 2576: 2507: 2354: 2336: 2322: 2293: 2197: 2061: 2027: 1965: 1923: 1903: 1831: 1799: 1761: 1698: 1682: 1664: 1650: 1634: 1620: 1596: 1198: 1138: 947: 846: 763: 754:
policy. The party simply being member of IDU doesn't mean the party is center-right. For example
94: 3707: 3677: 3650: 3627: 3601: 3575: 3556: 3536: 3520: 3490: 3472: 3457: 3443: 3414: 3399: 3380: 3352: 3337: 3275: 3247: 3233: 3218: 3204: 3190: 3176: 3162: 3148: 3133: 3114: 3094: 3061: 3027: 3001: 2902: 2887: 2812: 2798: 2783: 2765: 2751: 2735: 2720: 2705: 2683: 2668: 2654: 2639: 2624: 2610: 2595: 2580: 2565: 2550: 2526: 2511: 2492: 2472: 2457: 2358: 2340: 2326: 2297: 2283: 2263: 2235: 2215: 2201: 2180: 2151: 2093: 2065: 2045: 2031: 1984: 1969: 1955: 1927: 1907: 1892: 1849: 1835: 1803: 1780: 1765: 1748: 1730: 1702: 1686: 1668: 1654: 1638: 1624: 1600: 1582: 1562: 1548: 1516: 1478: 1452: 1437: 1422: 1407: 1385: 1344: 1321: 1301: 1272: 1239: 1225: 1110: 1092: 1070: 1048: 1022: 1000: 979: 965: 951: 936: 913: 885: 864: 850: 836: 818: 786: 767: 732: 722: 693: 661: 3482: 3464: 3449: 3406: 3391: 3364: 3333: 3225: 3196: 3168: 3140: 2993: 2962: 2936: 2898: 2771: 2757: 2712: 2675: 2646: 2635: 2602: 2587: 2557: 2542: 2518: 2484: 1788: 1740: 1677:
Even so, the evidence you claim does not state that the PPP is a social conservative party. --
1474: 1381: 1313: 1106: 1044: 996: 909: 881: 75: 3090: 1493:
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
1278:
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
1133: 758:
is member of IDU but generally described as right-wing or far-right by international media.
3124:
I think it should be removed, as it constitutes an element of conservatism in South Korea.
3047: 2159:, a magazine with global influence, also classified People's Power as a center-right party. 2693: 2427: 2417: 2407: 1365: 1203: 407: 3698:
However, national conservatism includes social conservatism, so the latter is redundant.
2556:
Please don't change your political position before an agreement is reached through Talk.
1128: 17: 2314:
It seems like it would be good to hang related evidence articles next to each tendency.
1823: 1812:
The Nation, a reliable journalist, also evaluated the power of the people as far-right.
1357: 1332: 1328: 1157:"As South Koreans head for polls, Moon gains currency with coronavirus crisis handling" 1006: 920: 894: 802: 1721:) I would like you to explain why you think the People's Power is a far-right party.-- 401: 391: 364: 3724: 3587: 3547:
The Party has explicitly taken on the issue of opposing "feminists and misandrists".
3528: 3512: 3507: 3053: 3019: 2879: 2856: 2804: 2790: 2775: 2743: 2727: 2697: 2689: 2660: 2616: 2572: 2503: 2350: 2332: 2318: 2289: 2193: 2142:
parties – which declares commitment to human rights as well as economic development.
2057: 2023: 1961: 1919: 1899: 1827: 1795: 1757: 1694: 1660: 1646: 1616: 1592: 1245:
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
943: 891: 842: 759: 751: 678: 2021:, it is considered to have been moderated and moved to a simple right-wing position. 970:
I think it would be better not to just indicate the political position of the UFP.--
3082: 2852: 2331:
If there is no objection within the next day, I will revise it as suggested above.
2018: 1530: 1470: 1466: 1392: 1377: 1373: 1102: 1077: 1056: 1040: 992: 905: 877: 682: 549: 2017:
It was originally evaluated as right-wing to far-right, but after the election of
3303: 3086: 2074: 1507:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —
1292:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —
686: 1718: 336: 2079: 2001: 1809:
data that evaluates to the right and the data that evaluates to the far right.
1182: 798: 526: 520: 499: 397: 2659:
No other wiki users have agreed to your input. Please make consensus first.
2005: 729: 690: 3042: 2870:
It was mentioned in an article in the New York Times as being right-winged.
1859:
But we have to see an agreement, so I propose a big tent as an alternative.
3424:
none provided by yourself) as to why that's not what they are saying here.
2878:
It seems rather extreme to deny that there is even a right-wing tendency.
3371:. What other definition do you think it is referring to in this context? 3368: 2483:, the predecessor and de facto mainstream of PPP, is a far-right party.-- 1867: 420: 3614:
overlap to a certain extent they don't always do. Take parties like the
2601:
is overwhelmingly expressed as "right-wing" rather than "centre-right."
266: 245: 1817:
https://www.thenation.com/article/world/south-korea-elections-climate/
1674:
Has PPP ever officially argued for anti-feminism at the party level?
827:
party. I don't think the party should be labeled as a center-right.--
755: 2420: 2053:
I asked why TBS is a far-left broadcaster, so why doesn't it answer?
1917:
https://www.donga.com/news/Politics/article/all/20210916/109289218/1
2910: 1230:
Oops, my mistake. Not "National Power", it's "People Power Party"
1199:"'Unity in time of crisis pushes up approval rating for President'" 467: 3562:
Fiscal conservatism, National conservatism and Social conservatism
3033:
https://www.hani.co.kr/arti/politics/politics_general/1073262.html
2410: 2400: 1856:
Why do you keep repeating subjective claims based on biased media?
1101:
the majority of sources choose to describe the UFP as right-wing.
280: 278:, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to 2803:
If there is no objection by tomorrow, I will revise it as above.
1993:
How about writing it this way with as much agreement as possible?
3038:
https://www.khan.co.kr/politics/assembly/article/202210182102025
700: 292:. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the 608: 208: 39: 26: 777:
Here's at least one source for the "right-wing" designation.
3296:"Myth of Pure-Blood Nationalism Blocks Multi-Ethnic Society" 1785:
This Korean press evaluated the people's power as far-right.
956:
I agree. I'm against describing the UFP as a center-right.--
466: 335: 3209:
What has that go to do with keeping "social conservatism"?
1789:
https://www.pressian.com/pages/articles/2021082222314899642
2911:
Let's vote to determine the political position of the PPP
2539:
Why don't you remove the political position from infobox?
904:
with the sources listed here on or after April 23, 2020.
3506:
explicitly depict the party as such, which violates the
3195:
No. I think "social conservatism" should be maintained.
3048:
https://m.hankookilbo.com/News/Read/A2022071109590000646
2740: 1178:"Electoral Triumph Spurs Green New Deal in South Korea" 1771:
think the PPP is on the same line with these parties?
728:
How does that link verify your claims — I'm confused.
184: 1645:
opposition to LGBTQ human rights and anti-feminism.--
900:
If no one has any objections, I'll list the party as
1824:
http://www.giview.co.kr/mobile/article.html?no=31644
1129:"Three minor parties merge ahead of April elections" 548:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 419:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2349:Would you like to agree on a settlement agreement? 1364:, using that to describe this party could count as 2847:Removing right-wing from PPP's political spectrum 1368:. Besides, it seems like the source used on the 57:for general discussion of the article's subject. 1693:presidential candidates, are anti-feminists. -- 605:Semi-protected edit request on 24 February 2020 2118:, to which the PPP belongs, is an alliance of 1259:Participate in the deletion discussion at the 3181:So, are we in agreement it shall be removed? 2075:https://www.pressian.com/pages/articles/70683 1428:Moreover, the UFP is a new political party.-- 198: 8: 2541:I can never agree that I am a center-right. 1719:https://www.christiantoday.co.kr/news/340657 2107:a young leader to garner more support from 2080:https://www.mbn.co.kr/news/politics/4701862 648: 3616:Social Democratic Party (UK, 1990–present) 3101:"Social conservatism" and "Anti-communism" 2930: 1529:First, remove all other ideologies except 704: 494: 359: 240: 3761:High-importance political party articles 3501:Explanations about the edits I have made 3043:https://www.nocutnews.co.kr/news/5870335 1307:Ideologies not based on reliable sources 284:. All interested editors are invited to 3286: 2389: 1522:About Ideologies and Political Spectrum 1120: 703:and Please ask to the UFP HQ. Thanks. 496: 361: 242: 212: 3736:High-importance Korea-related articles 2465:2001:2D8:6C34:2CF7:D9CD:88FC:CA79:6051 1356:I don't believe that this falls under 1150: 1148: 3781:High-importance Conservatism articles 3766:Political parties task force articles 2450:2001:2D8:922:613B:651B:E237:1E93:1555 1553:Please ignore some typing mistakes;; 7: 3477:I've been thinking for a long time, 2990:Right-wing (with far-right factions) 2926:Right-wing (with far-right factions) 2109:young voters and those in the center 542:This article is within the scope of 413:This article is within the scope of 272:This article is within the scope of 1536:Second, remove politocal spectrum. 347:one or more inactive working groups 47:for discussing improvements to the 3527:maintained for more than a month. 3511:edits, please leave a reply here. 2846: 2171:have clashed over... blahblahblah 1883:Do you agree with this statement? 562:Knowledge:WikiProject Conservatism 25: 3786:WikiProject Conservatism articles 3751:High-importance politics articles 3294:Park, Chung-a (August 14, 2006). 565:Template:WikiProject Conservatism 3756:C-Class political party articles 668: 612: 529: 519: 498: 400: 390: 363: 265: 244: 213: 69:Click here to start a new topic. 49:People Power Party (South Korea) 3549:2A02:3030:81D:B7C:1:0:E6A6:EE35 3324:Outdated grammar in “2020-2021” 2169:centre-right People Power Party 1539:Please suggest your opinion. -- 1254:Logo of United Future Party.png 1197:Park Han-sol (25 August 2020). 823:I agree. The party is a simple 582:This article has been rated as 453:This article has been rated as 322:This article has been rated as 3731:C-Class Korea-related articles 3095:08:00, 20 September 2022 (UTC) 3002:07:55, 20 September 2022 (UTC) 2971:07:49, 20 September 2022 (UTC) 2949:07:56, 20 September 2022 (UTC) 2903:04:56, 17 September 2022 (UTC) 2888:14:09, 15 September 2022 (UTC) 2865:07:07, 10 September 2022 (UTC) 2813:02:40, 19 September 2022 (UTC) 2799:14:19, 15 September 2022 (UTC) 2784:07:21, 10 September 2022 (UTC) 2766:07:20, 10 September 2022 (UTC) 2752:07:15, 10 September 2022 (UTC) 2736:06:42, 10 September 2022 (UTC) 2721:06:32, 10 September 2022 (UTC) 2706:06:27, 10 September 2022 (UTC) 2684:06:20, 10 September 2022 (UTC) 2669:06:04, 10 September 2022 (UTC) 2655:04:57, 10 September 2022 (UTC) 2630:should be classified as well. 433:Knowledge:WikiProject Politics 231:It is of interest to multiple 1: 3776:C-Class Conservatism articles 3771:WikiProject Politics articles 3708:10:16, 31 December 2023 (UTC) 3678:01:43, 30 December 2023 (UTC) 3651:19:05, 29 December 2023 (UTC) 3628:19:00, 29 December 2023 (UTC) 3602:21:19, 27 December 2023 (UTC) 3353:15:54, 24 February 2023 (UTC) 3338:13:50, 24 February 2023 (UTC) 3248:14:15, 25 February 2023 (UTC) 3234:14:08, 25 February 2023 (UTC) 3219:13:33, 25 February 2023 (UTC) 3205:21:14, 24 February 2023 (UTC) 3191:15:41, 24 February 2023 (UTC) 3177:09:53, 24 February 2023 (UTC) 3163:21:32, 23 February 2023 (UTC) 3149:21:26, 23 February 2023 (UTC) 3134:20:59, 23 February 2023 (UTC) 2640:02:15, 8 September 2022 (UTC) 2625:09:04, 5 September 2022 (UTC) 1703:12:06, 18 December 2021 (UTC) 1687:11:41, 18 December 2021 (UTC) 1669:11:00, 18 December 2021 (UTC) 1655:10:58, 18 December 2021 (UTC) 1639:08:55, 18 December 2021 (UTC) 1625:07:05, 18 December 2021 (UTC) 1155:Power, John (13 April 2020). 768:01:26, 24 February 2020 (UTC) 733:01:22, 24 February 2020 (UTC) 723:01:19, 24 February 2020 (UTC) 694:00:36, 24 February 2020 (UTC) 681:for your changes by citing a 662:00:32, 24 February 2020 (UTC) 556:and see a list of open tasks. 475:This article is supported by 436:Template:WikiProject Politics 427:and see a list of open tasks. 344:This article is supported by 66:Put new text under old text. 3479:my position has now changed. 3115:17:07, 5 December 2022 (UTC) 2397:International Democrat Union 2124:Conservative Party of Canada 2116:International Democrat Union 1601:11:32, 3 December 2021 (UTC) 1176:Shorrock, Tim (1 May 2020). 902:"centre-right to right-wing" 701:https://www.idu.org/members/ 478:Political parties task force 3576:09:37, 5 October 2023 (UTC) 3073:Decisions on Knowledge are 3062:14:08, 4 January 2023 (UTC) 3028:14:05, 4 January 2023 (UTC) 3018:right-wing to center-right 3012:right wing to extreme right 2611:07:22, 30 August 2022 (UTC) 2596:07:18, 30 August 2022 (UTC) 2581:02:56, 30 August 2022 (UTC) 2566:21:39, 29 August 2022 (UTC) 2551:20:30, 29 August 2022 (UTC) 2527:07:42, 29 August 2022 (UTC) 2512:07:29, 29 August 2022 (UTC) 2493:06:28, 29 August 2022 (UTC) 2473:05:55, 29 August 2022 (UTC) 2458:03:13, 29 August 2022 (UTC) 2430:) Accessed on 22 June 2012. 1749:06:31, 29 August 2022 (UTC) 1111:23:30, 26 August 2020 (UTC) 639:to reactivate your request. 627:has been answered. Set the 302:Knowledge:WikiProject Korea 74:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 3802: 3741:WikiProject Korea articles 3592:: What do you guys think? 3537:05:26, 15 April 2023 (UTC) 3521:16:28, 14 April 2023 (UTC) 3491:07:43, 12 April 2023 (UTC) 3085:refer to its ideology as. 2954:Centre-right to right-wing 2421:Declaration of Principles. 2136:New Zealand National Party 2132:Liberal Party of Australia 2130:of the United States, the 1583:16:56, 4 August 2021 (UTC) 1322:09:20, 11 April 2020 (UTC) 1302:18:53, 10 April 2020 (UTC) 1049:15:49, 28 April 2020 (UTC) 1023:21:19, 24 April 2020 (UTC) 1001:02:57, 23 April 2020 (UTC) 980:01:14, 21 April 2020 (UTC) 966:01:12, 21 April 2020 (UTC) 952:22:50, 20 April 2020 (UTC) 937:18:13, 20 April 2020 (UTC) 914:17:12, 20 April 2020 (UTC) 886:14:48, 16 April 2020 (UTC) 865:06:01, 17 March 2020 (UTC) 851:05:03, 17 March 2020 (UTC) 837:03:36, 17 March 2020 (UTC) 819:02:58, 17 March 2020 (UTC) 588:project's importance scale 459:project's importance scale 328:project's importance scale 305:Template:WikiProject Korea 3746:C-Class politics articles 3473:21:56, 8 April 2023 (UTC) 3458:21:53, 8 April 2023 (UTC) 3444:21:47, 8 April 2023 (UTC) 3415:21:40, 8 April 2023 (UTC) 3400:21:36, 8 April 2023 (UTC) 3381:17:07, 6 April 2023 (UTC) 3276:17:19, 19 July 2023 (UTC) 2359:09:45, 14 June 2022 (UTC) 2311:center right to far right 1709:Political position of PPP 1563:06:00, 18 July 2021 (UTC) 1549:01:41, 17 July 2021 (UTC) 1517:11:53, 11 July 2021 (UTC) 1273:21:54, 8 April 2020 (UTC) 787:15:38, 5 March 2020 (UTC) 581: 514: 474: 452: 385: 343: 321: 260: 239: 104:Be welcoming to newcomers 33:Skip to table of contents 3557:15:27, 1 July 2023 (UTC) 2341:11:26, 9 June 2022 (UTC) 2327:15:27, 7 June 2022 (UTC) 2298:14:22, 7 June 2022 (UTC) 2284:10:28, 7 June 2022 (UTC) 2264:09:17, 6 June 2022 (UTC) 2236:10:28, 7 June 2022 (UTC) 2216:10:25, 7 June 2022 (UTC) 2202:08:11, 7 June 2022 (UTC) 2181:05:55, 7 June 2022 (UTC) 2152:05:44, 7 June 2022 (UTC) 2094:05:01, 7 June 2022 (UTC) 2066:13:00, 6 June 2022 (UTC) 2046:09:42, 6 June 2022 (UTC) 2032:09:31, 6 June 2022 (UTC) 1985:09:14, 6 June 2022 (UTC) 1970:09:08, 6 June 2022 (UTC) 1956:09:05, 6 June 2022 (UTC) 1928:08:33, 6 June 2022 (UTC) 1908:08:25, 6 June 2022 (UTC) 1893:02:47, 6 June 2022 (UTC) 1850:02:49, 6 June 2022 (UTC) 1836:02:39, 6 June 2022 (UTC) 1804:01:32, 6 June 2022 (UTC) 1781:15:12, 5 June 2022 (UTC) 1766:13:45, 5 June 2022 (UTC) 1731:07:19, 5 June 2022 (UTC) 1240:08:07, 26 May 2021 (UTC) 1226:06:43, 25 May 2021 (UTC) 1162:South China Morning Post 1093:11:39, 25 May 2020 (UTC) 545:WikiProject Conservatism 32: 18:Talk:United Future Party 2986:Right-wing to far-right 2923:Right-wing to far-right 2167:Yoon Seok-youl, of the 1479:00:39, 5 May 2020 (UTC) 1453:02:21, 3 May 2020 (UTC) 1438:02:45, 3 May 2020 (UTC) 1423:02:16, 3 May 2020 (UTC) 1408:02:07, 3 May 2020 (UTC) 1386:14:43, 2 May 2020 (UTC) 1345:02:43, 2 May 2020 (UTC) 1071:02:21, 2 May 2020 (UTC) 1005:I'd be fine with that. 471: 340: 308:Korea-related articles 288:and contribute to the 221:This article is rated 99:avoid personal attacks 1362:national-conservative 568:Conservatism articles 470: 339: 124:Neutral point of view 2305:Big tent, right wing 2140:Christian democratic 416:WikiProject Politics 129:No original research 3700:ValenciaThunderbolt 3643:ValenciaThunderbolt 3594:ValenciaThunderbolt 3568:ValenciaThunderbolt 3345:ValenciaThunderbolt 3240:ValenciaThunderbolt 3211:ValenciaThunderbolt 3183:ValenciaThunderbolt 3155:ValenciaThunderbolt 3126:ValenciaThunderbolt 3120:Social conservatism 3107:ValenciaThunderbolt 2481:Liberty Korea Party 2426:1 July 2012 at the 2416:1 July 2012 at the 2406:1 July 2012 at the 2105:conservatives chose 1607:Social conservatism 1370:Liberty Korea Party 1141:. 24 February 2020. 919:constituent parts. 795:Liberty Korea Party 625:United Future Party 537:Conservatism portal 3075:not made by voting 2696:policy. Thankyou. 2019:a new party leader 1998:Political position 1864:Political position 1509:Community Tech bot 1294:Community Tech bot 1265:Community Tech bot 1139:Yonhap News Agency 797:, I petition that 773:Political position 472: 341: 227:content assessment 110:dispute resolution 71: 2951: 2935:comment added by 1467:original research 1374:original research 745:Unitedfutureparty 725: 711:Unitedfutureparty 709:comment added by 654:Unitedfutureparty 643: 642: 602: 601: 598: 597: 594: 593: 493: 492: 489: 488: 439:politics articles 376:Political parties 358: 357: 354: 353: 275:WikiProject Korea 207: 206: 90:Assume good faith 67: 38: 37: 16:(Redirected from 3793: 3591: 3316: 3315: 3313: 3311: 3306:on July 25, 2011 3302:. Archived from 3291: 3083:reliable sources 2853:reliable sources 2851:I have found no 2439:Centre-right???? 2431: 2394: 2308:internal faction 2128:Republican Party 2013: 1875: 1502:Lee Jun Seok.jpg 1463: 1396: 1355: 1209: 1208: 1194: 1188: 1187: 1173: 1167: 1166: 1152: 1143: 1142: 1134:The Korea Herald 1125: 1081: 1060: 990: 748: 676: 672: 671: 651: 650: 634: 630: 616: 615: 609: 570: 569: 566: 563: 560: 539: 534: 533: 532: 523: 516: 515: 510: 502: 495: 441: 440: 437: 434: 431: 410: 405: 404: 394: 387: 386: 381: 378: 367: 360: 310: 309: 306: 303: 300: 286:join the project 269: 262: 261: 256: 248: 241: 224: 218: 217: 209: 203: 202: 188: 119:Article policies 40: 27: 21: 3801: 3800: 3796: 3795: 3794: 3792: 3791: 3790: 3721: 3720: 3581: 3564: 3545: 3503: 3361: 3326: 3321: 3320: 3319: 3309: 3307: 3300:The Korea Times 3293: 3292: 3288: 3122: 3103: 2978: 2913: 2849: 2517:"Right-wing".-- 2441: 2436: 2435: 2434: 2428:Wayback Machine 2418:Wayback Machine 2408:Wayback Machine 2395: 2391: 2276:210.221.255.174 2256:210.221.255.159 2228:210.221.255.174 2208:210.221.255.174 2038:210.221.255.159 2010: 1977:210.221.255.159 1948:210.221.255.159 1885:210.221.255.159 1872: 1842:210.221.255.159 1773:210.221.255.173 1711: 1609: 1570: 1524: 1495: 1457: 1390: 1349: 1309: 1280: 1261:nomination page 1247: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1204:The Korea Times 1196: 1195: 1191: 1175: 1174: 1170: 1154: 1153: 1146: 1127: 1126: 1122: 1075: 1054: 1021: 984: 935: 903: 817: 779:198.138.209.228 775: 742: 683:reliable source 669: 667: 647: 632: 628: 613: 607: 584:High-importance 567: 564: 561: 558: 557: 535: 530: 528: 509:High‑importance 508: 483:High-importance 455:High-importance 438: 435: 432: 429: 428: 408:Politics portal 406: 399: 380:High‑importance 379: 373: 324:High-importance 307: 304: 301: 298: 297: 255:High‑importance 254: 225:on Knowledge's 222: 145: 140: 139: 138: 115: 85: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 3799: 3797: 3789: 3788: 3783: 3778: 3773: 3768: 3763: 3758: 3753: 3748: 3743: 3738: 3733: 3723: 3722: 3719: 3718: 3717: 3716: 3715: 3714: 3713: 3712: 3711: 3710: 3687: 3686: 3685: 3684: 3683: 3682: 3681: 3680: 3658: 3657: 3656: 3655: 3654: 3653: 3633: 3632: 3631: 3630: 3605: 3604: 3563: 3560: 3544: 3543:Anti-feminism? 3541: 3540: 3539: 3502: 3499: 3498: 3497: 3496: 3495: 3494: 3493: 3475: 3460: 3428: 3427: 3426: 3425: 3418: 3417: 3402: 3360: 3357: 3356: 3355: 3325: 3322: 3318: 3317: 3285: 3284: 3280: 3279: 3278: 3264: 3263: 3262: 3261: 3260: 3259: 3258: 3257: 3256: 3255: 3254: 3253: 3252: 3251: 3250: 3121: 3118: 3102: 3099: 3098: 3097: 3068: 3067: 3066: 3065: 3064: 3050: 3045: 3040: 3035: 3016: 3015:Inner faction: 3013: 3010: 3007: 2977: 2974: 2959: 2958: 2955: 2952: 2927: 2924: 2921: 2912: 2909: 2908: 2907: 2906: 2905: 2876: 2871: 2848: 2845: 2844: 2843: 2842: 2841: 2840: 2839: 2838: 2837: 2836: 2835: 2834: 2833: 2832: 2831: 2830: 2829: 2828: 2827: 2826: 2825: 2824: 2823: 2822: 2821: 2820: 2819: 2818: 2817: 2816: 2815: 2768: 2598: 2536: 2535: 2534: 2533: 2532: 2531: 2530: 2529: 2476: 2475: 2447: 2440: 2437: 2433: 2432: 2388: 2387: 2383: 2382: 2381: 2380: 2379: 2378: 2377: 2376: 2375: 2374: 2373: 2372: 2371: 2370: 2369: 2368: 2367: 2366: 2365: 2364: 2363: 2362: 2361: 2347: 2346: 2345: 2344: 2343: 2315: 2312: 2309: 2306: 2303: 2272: 2252: 2251: 2250: 2249: 2248: 2247: 2246: 2245: 2244: 2243: 2242: 2241: 2240: 2239: 2238: 2224: 2190: 2187: 2165: 2160: 2154: 2112: 2101: 2096: 2082: 2077: 2072: 2054: 2051: 2022: 2008: 1994: 1991: 1943: 1940: 1937: 1934: 1914: 1881: 1880: 1870: 1860: 1857: 1854: 1853: 1852: 1820: 1813: 1810: 1791: 1786: 1752: 1751: 1723:211.202.127.36 1710: 1707: 1706: 1705: 1672: 1671: 1657: 1608: 1605: 1604: 1603: 1569: 1566: 1523: 1520: 1505: 1504: 1494: 1491: 1490: 1489: 1488: 1487: 1486: 1485: 1484: 1483: 1482: 1481: 1440: 1425: 1333:MOS:INFOBOXREF 1308: 1305: 1290: 1289: 1287:ParkWanSoo.jpg 1279: 1276: 1257: 1256: 1246: 1243: 1211: 1210: 1189: 1168: 1144: 1119: 1118: 1114: 1098: 1097: 1096: 1095: 1034: 1033: 1032: 1031: 1030: 1029: 1028: 1027: 1026: 1025: 1011: 968: 939: 925: 901: 874: 873: 872: 871: 870: 869: 868: 867: 807: 774: 771: 750:Please follow 749: 740: 739: 738: 737: 736: 735: 677:. Please gain 641: 640: 617: 606: 603: 600: 599: 596: 595: 592: 591: 580: 574: 573: 571: 554:the discussion 541: 540: 524: 512: 511: 503: 491: 490: 487: 486: 473: 463: 462: 451: 445: 444: 442: 425:the discussion 412: 411: 395: 383: 382: 368: 356: 355: 352: 351: 342: 332: 331: 320: 314: 313: 311: 270: 258: 257: 249: 237: 236: 230: 219: 205: 204: 142: 141: 137: 136: 131: 126: 117: 116: 114: 113: 106: 101: 92: 86: 84: 83: 72: 63: 62: 59: 58: 52: 36: 35: 30: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3798: 3787: 3784: 3782: 3779: 3777: 3774: 3772: 3769: 3767: 3764: 3762: 3759: 3757: 3754: 3752: 3749: 3747: 3744: 3742: 3739: 3737: 3734: 3732: 3729: 3728: 3726: 3709: 3705: 3701: 3697: 3696: 3695: 3694: 3693: 3692: 3691: 3690: 3689: 3688: 3679: 3675: 3671: 3666: 3665: 3664: 3663: 3662: 3661: 3660: 3659: 3652: 3648: 3644: 3639: 3638: 3637: 3636: 3635: 3634: 3629: 3625: 3621: 3617: 3613: 3609: 3608: 3607: 3606: 3603: 3599: 3595: 3589: 3585: 3580: 3579: 3578: 3577: 3573: 3569: 3561: 3559: 3558: 3554: 3550: 3542: 3538: 3534: 3530: 3525: 3524: 3523: 3522: 3518: 3514: 3509: 3500: 3492: 3488: 3484: 3480: 3476: 3474: 3470: 3466: 3461: 3459: 3455: 3451: 3447: 3446: 3445: 3441: 3437: 3432: 3431: 3430: 3429: 3422: 3421: 3420: 3419: 3416: 3412: 3408: 3403: 3401: 3397: 3393: 3389: 3385: 3384: 3383: 3382: 3378: 3374: 3370: 3366: 3358: 3354: 3350: 3346: 3342: 3341: 3340: 3339: 3335: 3331: 3323: 3305: 3301: 3297: 3290: 3287: 3283: 3277: 3273: 3269: 3265: 3249: 3245: 3241: 3237: 3236: 3235: 3231: 3227: 3222: 3221: 3220: 3216: 3212: 3208: 3207: 3206: 3202: 3198: 3194: 3193: 3192: 3188: 3184: 3180: 3179: 3178: 3174: 3170: 3166: 3165: 3164: 3160: 3156: 3152: 3151: 3150: 3146: 3142: 3138: 3137: 3136: 3135: 3131: 3127: 3119: 3117: 3116: 3112: 3108: 3100: 3096: 3092: 3088: 3084: 3080: 3076: 3072: 3069: 3063: 3059: 3055: 3052:are sources. 3051: 3049: 3046: 3044: 3041: 3039: 3036: 3034: 3031: 3030: 3029: 3025: 3021: 3017: 3014: 3011: 3008: 3005: 3004: 3003: 2999: 2995: 2991: 2987: 2983: 2980: 2979: 2975: 2973: 2972: 2968: 2964: 2956: 2953: 2950: 2946: 2942: 2938: 2934: 2928: 2925: 2922: 2919: 2918: 2917: 2904: 2900: 2896: 2891: 2890: 2889: 2885: 2881: 2877: 2875: 2872: 2869: 2868: 2867: 2866: 2862: 2858: 2854: 2814: 2810: 2806: 2802: 2801: 2800: 2796: 2792: 2787: 2786: 2785: 2781: 2777: 2773: 2769: 2767: 2763: 2759: 2755: 2754: 2753: 2749: 2745: 2741: 2739: 2738: 2737: 2733: 2729: 2724: 2723: 2722: 2718: 2714: 2709: 2708: 2707: 2703: 2699: 2695: 2691: 2687: 2686: 2685: 2681: 2677: 2672: 2671: 2670: 2666: 2662: 2658: 2657: 2656: 2652: 2648: 2643: 2642: 2641: 2637: 2633: 2628: 2627: 2626: 2622: 2618: 2614: 2613: 2612: 2608: 2604: 2599: 2597: 2593: 2589: 2584: 2583: 2582: 2578: 2574: 2569: 2568: 2567: 2563: 2559: 2555: 2554: 2553: 2552: 2548: 2544: 2540: 2528: 2524: 2520: 2515: 2514: 2513: 2509: 2505: 2501: 2500: 2499: 2498: 2497: 2496: 2495: 2494: 2490: 2486: 2482: 2474: 2470: 2466: 2462: 2461: 2460: 2459: 2455: 2451: 2445: 2438: 2429: 2425: 2422: 2419: 2415: 2412: 2409: 2405: 2402: 2398: 2393: 2390: 2386: 2360: 2356: 2352: 2348: 2342: 2338: 2334: 2330: 2329: 2328: 2324: 2320: 2316: 2313: 2310: 2307: 2304: 2301: 2300: 2299: 2295: 2291: 2287: 2286: 2285: 2281: 2277: 2273: 2271: 2267: 2266: 2265: 2261: 2257: 2253: 2237: 2233: 2229: 2225: 2223: 2219: 2218: 2217: 2213: 2209: 2205: 2204: 2203: 2199: 2195: 2191: 2188: 2184: 2183: 2182: 2178: 2174: 2173:211.114.22.80 2170: 2166: 2164: 2161: 2158: 2157:The Economist 2155: 2153: 2149: 2145: 2144:211.114.22.80 2141: 2137: 2133: 2129: 2125: 2121: 2117: 2113: 2110: 2106: 2102: 2100: 2097: 2095: 2091: 2087: 2086:211.114.22.80 2083: 2081: 2078: 2076: 2073: 2069: 2068: 2067: 2063: 2059: 2055: 2052: 2049: 2048: 2047: 2043: 2039: 2035: 2034: 2033: 2029: 2025: 2020: 2016: 2012: 2009: 2007: 2003: 1999: 1995: 1992: 1988: 1987: 1986: 1982: 1978: 1973: 1972: 1971: 1967: 1963: 1959: 1958: 1957: 1953: 1949: 1944: 1941: 1938: 1935: 1931: 1930: 1929: 1925: 1921: 1918: 1915: 1911: 1910: 1909: 1905: 1901: 1896: 1895: 1894: 1890: 1886: 1882: 1878: 1874: 1871: 1869: 1865: 1861: 1858: 1855: 1851: 1847: 1843: 1839: 1838: 1837: 1833: 1829: 1825: 1821: 1818: 1814: 1811: 1807: 1806: 1805: 1801: 1797: 1792: 1790: 1787: 1784: 1783: 1782: 1778: 1774: 1769: 1768: 1767: 1763: 1759: 1754: 1753: 1750: 1746: 1742: 1738: 1735: 1734: 1733: 1732: 1728: 1724: 1720: 1714: 1708: 1704: 1700: 1696: 1691: 1690: 1689: 1688: 1684: 1680: 1675: 1670: 1666: 1662: 1658: 1656: 1652: 1648: 1643: 1642: 1641: 1640: 1636: 1632: 1627: 1626: 1622: 1618: 1614: 1606: 1602: 1598: 1594: 1590: 1587: 1586: 1585: 1584: 1580: 1576: 1567: 1565: 1564: 1560: 1556: 1551: 1550: 1546: 1542: 1537: 1534: 1532: 1527: 1521: 1519: 1518: 1514: 1510: 1503: 1500: 1499: 1498: 1492: 1480: 1476: 1472: 1468: 1461: 1456: 1455: 1454: 1450: 1446: 1441: 1439: 1435: 1431: 1426: 1424: 1420: 1416: 1411: 1410: 1409: 1405: 1401: 1394: 1389: 1388: 1387: 1383: 1379: 1375: 1371: 1367: 1363: 1359: 1353: 1348: 1347: 1346: 1342: 1338: 1334: 1330: 1326: 1325: 1324: 1323: 1319: 1315: 1306: 1304: 1303: 1299: 1295: 1288: 1285: 1284: 1283: 1277: 1275: 1274: 1270: 1266: 1262: 1255: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1244: 1242: 1241: 1237: 1233: 1228: 1227: 1223: 1219: 1206: 1205: 1200: 1193: 1190: 1185: 1184: 1179: 1172: 1169: 1164: 1163: 1158: 1151: 1149: 1145: 1140: 1136: 1135: 1130: 1124: 1121: 1117: 1113: 1112: 1108: 1104: 1094: 1090: 1086: 1079: 1074: 1073: 1072: 1068: 1064: 1058: 1053: 1052: 1051: 1050: 1046: 1042: 1038: 1024: 1019: 1015: 1010: 1009: 1004: 1003: 1002: 998: 994: 988: 983: 982: 981: 977: 973: 969: 967: 963: 959: 955: 954: 953: 949: 945: 940: 938: 933: 929: 924: 923: 917: 916: 915: 911: 907: 899: 896: 893: 890: 889: 888: 887: 883: 879: 866: 862: 858: 854: 853: 852: 848: 844: 840: 839: 838: 834: 830: 826: 822: 821: 820: 815: 811: 806: 805: 800: 796: 791: 790: 789: 788: 784: 780: 772: 770: 769: 765: 761: 757: 753: 746: 734: 731: 727: 726: 724: 720: 716: 712: 708: 702: 697: 696: 695: 692: 689:your claims. 688: 684: 680: 675: 666: 665: 664: 663: 659: 655: 638: 635:parameter to 626: 622: 618: 611: 610: 604: 589: 585: 579: 576: 575: 572: 555: 551: 547: 546: 538: 527: 525: 522: 518: 517: 513: 507: 504: 501: 497: 484: 481:(assessed as 480: 479: 469: 465: 464: 460: 456: 450: 447: 446: 443: 426: 422: 418: 417: 409: 403: 398: 396: 393: 389: 388: 384: 377: 372: 369: 366: 362: 349: 348: 338: 334: 333: 329: 325: 319: 316: 315: 312: 295: 294:documentation 291: 287: 283: 282: 277: 276: 271: 268: 264: 263: 259: 253: 250: 247: 243: 238: 234: 228: 220: 216: 211: 210: 201: 197: 194: 191: 187: 183: 179: 176: 173: 170: 167: 164: 161: 158: 155: 151: 148: 147:Find sources: 144: 143: 135: 134:Verifiability 132: 130: 127: 125: 122: 121: 120: 111: 107: 105: 102: 100: 96: 93: 91: 88: 87: 81: 77: 76:Learn to edit 73: 70: 65: 64: 61: 60: 56: 50: 46: 42: 41: 34: 31: 29: 28: 19: 3611: 3565: 3546: 3504: 3483:Mureungdowon 3478: 3465:Mureungdowon 3450:Mureungdowon 3407:Mureungdowon 3392:Mureungdowon 3390:with Japan. 3387: 3365:Mureungdowon 3362: 3327: 3308:. Retrieved 3304:the original 3299: 3289: 3281: 3226:Mureungdowon 3197:Mureungdowon 3169:Mureungdowon 3141:Mureungdowon 3123: 3104: 3070: 2994:Mureungdowon 2989: 2985: 2981: 2963:Mureungdowon 2960: 2957:Centre-right 2937:Mureungdowon 2931:— Preceding 2929:Right-wing 2914: 2850: 2772:Mureungdowon 2758:Mureungdowon 2713:Mureungdowon 2676:Mureungdowon 2647:Mureungdowon 2603:Mureungdowon 2588:Mureungdowon 2558:Mureungdowon 2543:Mureungdowon 2538: 2537: 2519:Mureungdowon 2485:Mureungdowon 2477: 2446: 2442: 2392: 2384: 2268: 2220: 2168: 2156: 2120:centre-right 2119: 2108: 2104: 2014: 2011: 1997: 1876: 1873: 1863: 1741:Mureungdowon 1736: 1715: 1712: 1676: 1673: 1628: 1612: 1610: 1588: 1571: 1552: 1538: 1535: 1531:conservatism 1528: 1525: 1506: 1496: 1327:Please read 1314:Res Iudicata 1310: 1291: 1281: 1258: 1248: 1229: 1215: 1202: 1192: 1181: 1171: 1160: 1132: 1123: 1115: 1099: 1035: 1007: 921: 875: 824: 803: 776: 741: 705:— Preceding 673: 644: 636: 621:edit request 583: 559:Conservatism 550:conservatism 543: 506:Conservatism 476: 454: 414: 345: 323: 279: 273: 233:WikiProjects 195: 189: 181: 174: 168: 162: 156: 146: 118: 43:This is the 3343:Corrected. 3238:Okay then. 3077:, but by a 2674:disputes.-- 2645:position.-- 1575:Pigatemypie 172:free images 55:not a forum 3725:Categories 3282:References 2982:Right-wing 2711:article.-- 2385:References 2186:far-right. 2114:Also, The 2002:right-wing 1183:The Nation 1116:References 825:right-wing 799:right-wing 649:(Redacted) 629:|answered= 290:discussion 3670:Helper201 3620:Helper201 3584:Helper201 3436:Helper201 3373:Helper201 3268:Helper201 3079:consensus 2920:Far-right 2411:Founders. 2270:campaign. 2222:campaign. 2006:far-right 1555:Liberally 1541:Liberally 1366:synthesis 1232:Liberally 1218:Liberally 1008:HapHaxion 922:HapHaxion 804:HapHaxion 679:consensus 112:if needed 95:Be polite 45:talk page 3588:Lazt9312 3529:Lazt9312 3513:Jeff6045 3369:war hawk 3310:July 25, 3054:Lazt9312 3020:Lazt9312 2945:contribs 2933:unsigned 2880:Lazt9312 2857:Jeff6045 2805:Lazt9312 2791:Lazt9312 2776:Jeff6045 2744:Jeff6045 2728:Jeff6045 2698:Jeff6045 2694:WP:CIVIL 2661:Jeff6045 2617:Lazt9312 2573:Jeff6045 2504:Jeff6045 2424:Archived 2414:Archived 2404:Archived 2401:History. 2351:Lazt9312 2333:Lazt9312 2319:Lazt9312 2290:Lazt9312 2194:Lazt9312 2103:- While 2058:Lazt9312 2024:Lazt9312 1962:Lazt9312 1933:article. 1920:Lazt9312 1900:Lazt9312 1868:Big tent 1828:Lazt9312 1796:Lazt9312 1758:Lazt9312 1695:Storm598 1679:Sure3910 1661:Storm598 1647:Storm598 1631:Sure3910 1617:Storm598 1593:Storm598 1568:Ideology 1413:party.-- 1018:contribs 944:Jeff6045 932:contribs 843:Jeff6045 814:contribs 760:Jeff6045 719:contribs 707:unsigned 687:verifies 674:Not done 430:Politics 421:politics 371:Politics 80:get help 53:This is 51:article. 3359:Infobox 3330:Benmsch 3071:Comment 2895:769haas 2632:769haas 2071:party'. 1471:Ezhao02 1393:Ezhao02 1378:Ezhao02 1358:WP:BLUE 1329:WP:BLUE 1103:Ezhao02 1078:Ezhao02 1057:Ezhao02 1041:Ezhao02 993:Ezhao02 906:Ezhao02 878:Ezhao02 586:on the 457:on the 326:on the 223:C-class 178:WP refs 166:scholar 3508:WP:SYN 3087:331dot 2690:WP:CON 2134:, the 2126:, the 1589:Oppose 756:Fidesz 752:WP:SYN 685:which 229:scale. 150:Google 633:|ans= 619:This 299:Korea 281:Korea 252:Korea 193:JSTOR 154:books 108:Seek 3704:talk 3674:talk 3647:talk 3624:talk 3598:talk 3586:and 3572:talk 3553:talk 3533:talk 3517:talk 3487:talk 3469:talk 3454:talk 3440:talk 3411:talk 3396:talk 3377:talk 3349:talk 3334:talk 3312:2011 3272:talk 3244:talk 3230:talk 3215:talk 3201:talk 3187:talk 3173:talk 3159:talk 3145:talk 3130:talk 3111:talk 3091:talk 3058:talk 3024:talk 2998:talk 2976:Vote 2967:talk 2941:talk 2899:talk 2884:talk 2861:talk 2809:talk 2795:talk 2780:talk 2762:talk 2748:talk 2732:talk 2717:talk 2702:talk 2692:and 2680:talk 2665:talk 2651:talk 2636:talk 2621:talk 2607:talk 2592:talk 2577:talk 2562:talk 2547:talk 2523:talk 2508:talk 2489:talk 2469:talk 2454:talk 2355:talk 2337:talk 2323:talk 2294:talk 2280:talk 2260:talk 2232:talk 2212:talk 2198:talk 2177:talk 2148:talk 2138:and 2090:talk 2062:talk 2042:talk 2028:talk 1981:talk 1966:talk 1952:talk 1924:talk 1904:talk 1889:talk 1846:talk 1832:talk 1800:talk 1777:talk 1762:talk 1745:talk 1727:talk 1699:talk 1683:talk 1665:talk 1651:talk 1635:talk 1621:talk 1597:talk 1579:talk 1559:talk 1545:talk 1513:talk 1475:talk 1460:삭은사과 1449:talk 1445:삭은사과 1434:talk 1430:삭은사과 1419:talk 1415:삭은사과 1404:talk 1400:삭은사과 1382:talk 1352:삭은사과 1341:talk 1337:삭은사과 1331:and 1318:talk 1298:talk 1269:talk 1236:talk 1222:talk 1107:talk 1089:talk 1085:삭은사과 1067:talk 1063:삭은사과 1045:talk 1037:삭은사과 1014:talk 997:talk 987:삭은사과 976:talk 972:삭은사과 962:talk 958:삭은사과 948:talk 928:talk 910:talk 882:talk 861:talk 857:삭은사과 847:talk 833:talk 829:삭은사과 810:talk 783:talk 764:talk 730:El_C 715:talk 691:El_C 658:talk 578:High 449:High 318:High 186:FENS 160:news 97:and 3612:can 3388:war 3363:Hi 2988:or 2984:or 2399:. ( 2004:to 1263:. — 631:or 623:to 200:TWL 3727:: 3706:) 3676:) 3649:) 3626:) 3600:) 3574:) 3555:) 3535:) 3519:) 3489:) 3471:) 3456:) 3442:) 3413:) 3398:) 3379:) 3351:) 3336:) 3298:. 3274:) 3246:) 3232:) 3217:) 3203:) 3189:) 3175:) 3161:) 3147:) 3132:) 3113:) 3093:) 3060:) 3026:) 3000:) 2969:) 2961:-- 2947:) 2943:• 2901:) 2886:) 2863:) 2811:) 2797:) 2782:) 2764:) 2750:) 2734:) 2719:) 2704:) 2682:) 2667:) 2653:) 2638:) 2623:) 2609:) 2594:) 2579:) 2564:) 2549:) 2525:) 2510:) 2491:) 2471:) 2456:) 2357:) 2339:) 2325:) 2296:) 2282:) 2262:) 2234:) 2214:) 2200:) 2179:) 2150:) 2092:) 2064:) 2044:) 2030:) 2015:a: 2000:= 1996:| 1983:) 1968:) 1954:) 1926:) 1906:) 1891:) 1877:a: 1866:= 1862:| 1848:) 1834:) 1826:) 1822:( 1815:( 1802:) 1779:) 1764:) 1747:) 1729:) 1701:) 1685:) 1667:) 1653:) 1637:) 1623:) 1599:) 1581:) 1561:) 1547:) 1533:. 1515:) 1477:) 1451:) 1436:) 1421:) 1406:) 1384:) 1376:. 1343:) 1320:) 1300:) 1271:) 1238:) 1224:) 1201:. 1180:. 1159:. 1147:^ 1137:. 1131:. 1109:) 1091:) 1069:) 1047:) 1016:/ 999:) 978:) 964:) 950:) 930:/ 912:) 884:) 863:) 849:) 835:) 812:/ 785:) 766:) 721:) 717:• 660:) 652:. 637:no 485:). 374:: 180:) 78:; 3702:( 3672:( 3645:( 3622:( 3596:( 3590:: 3582:@ 3570:( 3551:( 3531:( 3515:( 3485:( 3467:( 3452:( 3438:( 3409:( 3394:( 3375:( 3347:( 3332:( 3314:. 3270:( 3242:( 3228:( 3213:( 3199:( 3185:( 3171:( 3157:( 3143:( 3128:( 3109:( 3089:( 3056:( 3022:( 2996:( 2965:( 2939:( 2897:( 2882:( 2859:( 2807:( 2793:( 2778:( 2770:@ 2760:( 2746:( 2730:( 2715:( 2700:( 2678:( 2663:( 2649:( 2634:( 2619:( 2605:( 2590:( 2575:( 2560:( 2545:( 2521:( 2506:( 2487:( 2467:( 2452:( 2353:( 2335:( 2321:( 2292:( 2278:( 2258:( 2230:( 2210:( 2196:( 2175:( 2146:( 2088:( 2060:( 2040:( 2026:( 1979:( 1964:( 1950:( 1922:( 1902:( 1887:( 1844:( 1830:( 1819:) 1798:( 1775:( 1760:( 1743:( 1725:( 1717:( 1697:( 1681:( 1663:( 1649:( 1633:( 1619:( 1595:( 1577:( 1557:( 1543:( 1511:( 1473:( 1462:: 1458:@ 1447:( 1432:( 1417:( 1402:( 1395:: 1391:@ 1380:( 1354:: 1350:@ 1339:( 1316:( 1296:( 1267:( 1234:( 1220:( 1207:. 1186:. 1165:. 1105:( 1087:( 1080:: 1076:@ 1065:( 1059:: 1055:@ 1043:( 1020:) 1012:( 995:( 989:: 985:@ 974:( 960:( 946:( 934:) 926:( 908:( 898:​ 895:​ 892:​ 880:( 859:( 845:( 831:( 816:) 808:( 781:( 762:( 747:: 743:@ 713:( 656:( 590:. 461:. 350:. 330:. 296:. 235:. 196:· 190:· 182:· 175:· 169:· 163:· 157:· 152:( 82:. 20:)

Index

Talk:United Future Party
Skip to table of contents
talk page
People Power Party (South Korea)
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL

content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Korea

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.