3145:
from
Scotland to Ireland in the plantations or time period after. I suspect that when these people arrived in Ireland that they referred to themselves as Scottish and had a Scottish culture then eventually as Irish as they assimilated - I imagine this is difficult to comprehend nowadays as the communities for which /Ulster Scots/ are associated is generally Unionist/Loyalist and British. However, only after the partitioning of Ireland and the creation of N.Ireland do you tend to see individuals call themselves British or Ulster Scots. In the 19th century, you will see Protestant organisations referenced as Irish or Ireland. The largest unionist party in Ireland pre-partition was called the 'IRISH Unionists'. If you read any of the Ordnance Survey Memoirs for Ireland, for areas of historical Scottish settlement, you will see the people referred to in relation to their Scottish manner or habits. Their cultural habits may have been different but the people were Irish by nationality and regarded themselves as so. There are countless examples of this. This page appears to try to almost paint Ulster Scots as a polar opposite to Irish, like it's a nationality. It isn't. The people were culturally separate. However, given Scottish traditions (including the Lowlands) there is likely some overlap with Irish traditions. In the rebellion of 1641, the Scottish were said to be spared by the Irish rebels due to the similar affinities - the wikipedia article for the 1641 rebellion even states this.
3039:, just to get it on the record. The flags are not being used to "represent" Ulster Scots, so anywhere that's mentioed is irrelevant. They are being used to show the historical origins of the people who came to be the Ulster Scots, and they have been in the article a long time. Other Knowledge (XXG) articles use flags in the same way, so such use is either not a "violation" of Knowledge (XXG)'s rules, or the rules are being violated left and right. Maybe some of you who are dead set against the "random" use of flags need to visit some othere articles and clean house. The article on Detroit shows the flags of France, Great Britain, and the USA, even though the city is neither French nor British, and is not the USA, (even though it's IN the USA). The article on French Canadians displays multiple national, civic flags, and ethnic flags, although none represent "French Canadians" as a specific ethnicity (and even some of the ethnic flags are not especially accepted or even known about by many they are supposed to represent). The article on Afrikaners doesn't display flags of countries where the Afrikaners' ancestors originated, but it does display the national flags of the various countries where Afrikaners live today, including New Zealand, Brazil, and Argentina.
1769:; that's not "going about editing", that's interfering with everyone else's editing. Alssa1 is confusing making an edit (attempting to contribute to the encyclopedia) with making the same edit over and over again despite objections (disrupting the encyclopedia). And "it might still be a good contribution" does not mean "is necessarily a good contribution", especially in the face of multiple reasons that it is not a good one. Finally, "a people and their ethnogenesis" has nothing really to do with sticking a bunch of flag images on them. The very fact that Alssa1 is treating the Ulster Scots as if they were a homogenous blob is problematic, as I've already pointed out, and which Alssa1 just ignored or simply did not understand ("This is talking tangentially to the point" Alssa1 responded, remember).
3020:, the flags are not being used to represent the Ulster Scots people and are only being used for decoration. None of those flags represent Ulster Scots. Just because Ulster Scots have lived in those countries doesn't mean they represent them. Would you use the Union Flag to represent Irish people? Extreme example yes, but not removed from what the flags are being used to represent here. None of those flags represent Ulster Scots and Ulster Scots are not represented by those flags. Ulster Scots are not a unified people or a nation and are therefore not represented by any national flag. They're just an ethnic group with no other real ties and at no point in history have any of those flags been used to represent Ulster Scots.
290:
269:
1761:, etc. If Alssa1's principle were valid, we probably could have no guidelines or policies at all (at least not enforceable ones, and it would certainly be impossible to introduce new P&G that addressed pre-existing problems, since the pre-existing would be automatically immune!), and all content on WP would just be directly controlled by a pack of warring wikiprojects asserting temporal primacy against each other on a page-by-page basis. Be glad that is not the case. Next, "doesn't damage the usability or usefulness of the article" is not an inclusion rationale, and is a classic "argument to avoid" (
1679:(and note local consensus cannot usually override the MOS.) In no way do these flags represent the people the article is discussing. Not a single one of those flags represents a geographic area solely populated by the people being discussed. And this people are not confined to any of the geographic areas represented by those flags. Additionally they're not mentioned in the article and as a result of these points, per the MOS they're not being used to support the article and are merely decorative which is not permitted. This isn't necessarily about flags either, it's about not having relevant images.
1871:
involved in another contentious discussion about a related article that you'd like to change the name of. You are involved in contention about that article, and you are involved in contention about this article. Nobody likes it when someone just wants to wield a stick to stir things up. Whether or not there are flag images in this group doesn't matter to the content. Maybe they are just decorative. But stirring up contention about it doesn't do the community any good at all. They aren't hurting anything by simply being part of the decor. Please try to be a little bit less contentious.
3149:
Scotland to
Ireland and vice versa, INCLUDING PRE-PLANTATION. There is genetic evidence of links between Down and Galloway. The haplogroups for Irish clans like McGuinness are also found in southwest Scotland. Similarly Dal Riada and the migrations between the Glens of Antrim -Ballycastle/Cushendall and Argyll. The religious affiliations doesn't really matter. You can see Scottish Gaelic Catholics in the Glens of Antrim, like those settled in the MacDonnell estate. You can also see Scottish Gaelic Presbyterians in Ireland. I point to McKinley, the American President.
1961:
don't materially influence the article. But they do reflect the countries associated with the history of the Ulster Scots. They are fine. Loads of
Knowledge (XXG) articles have superfluous images, that do not materially contribute to the article. They are pictures, and an article could serve perfectly well with only words. But pictures provide a bit of visual enhancement. If someone had tossed in the flags of Russia or Japan, then I'd have an issue with it, but the flags shown do indeed reflect the history of the Ulster Scots.
1125:. Everything about the flag usage you're trying to insist on is politically laden, from applying a traditional flag of Ireland to people mostly in Northern Ireland, to using an unofficial Ulster flag that is a Unionist symbol, to applying a Scottish flag to people only descended multi-generationally from Scots, to adding the flag of England which really has nothing to do with Ulster Scots or Ulster at all (the English flag is not the Union Jack). And you are certainly not "listen to concerns raised by other editors" so far.
1907:. "Please try to be a little bit less contentious." Our talk pages exist for improving the pages they are attached to; this generally requires contention, because editors do not have a hive mind. Going around page after page disagreeing with me, and more to the point making inappropriate insinuations about my motivations, is not you being "a bit less contentious", it's you picking a fight about as pointedly as one can be picked here.
2604:. FOTW is a long-established wiki-type repository for, as the name suggests, flags. Here you will find multiple uses of the Cross of St George by organizations which draw their primary membership from Ulster Scots, and some lesser use of the Cross of St Andrew (although in my own experience in Northern Ireland I've seen more St. Andrew's Crosses than those of St George). Also see Ulster University's CAIN Archive concerning
1890:
Stick to the actual rationales presented in discussions instead of following around people who disagreed with you in one place to demonize them in others. And try thinking before coming up with conspiracy-theory-style wild hypotheses about other editors' motives: If it's plausible that you happened to notice this discussion because you have a bunch of articles on your watchlist, don't you think maybe, maybe it possible that
2801:. Just because you are failing to understand how Knowledge (XXG) works and what its policies actually mean doesn't mean anyone is doing you a wrong or making any other kind of mistake. In particular, 'So Knowledge (XXG) "consensus" is itself not a reliable source about what is or isn't a reliable source' is just confused in the extreme. WP's own internal determinations as to what are reliable sources are quite binding (see
589:
568:
494:
799:
778:
484:
463:
3192:
anything about until the last generation or so) has nothing to do with socio-cultural group identity (either intrinsic to the group or used historically/anthropologically/sociologically as a categoriser). The most that needs to be done here is some clarity about when the term arose, but that will require further reliable sourcing, if there is even a source that identifies the coining of the term at all.
1135:, but Ulster Scots are not a sovereign state, and they cross multiple sovereign states even in their home area. That section of MOS:FLAGS even addresses the UK in particular, suggesting that sometimes (usually not) flags for NI, Scotland, Wales, and England are separably useful in an article, but it does not do so for ethno-sociological groups like Ulster Scots. Back to one of these flags in particular:
809:
238:
207:
1794:. We don't remove long-standing edits while a discussion is taking place to resolve the dispute. As for the claim about 'homogeneity' of the Ulster Scots and me ignoring/not understanding your point - my position is that I didn't assert nor suggest that the Ulster Scots were a homogenous group, therefore having a discussion along those lines is tangential to the issue at hand.
1448:"You haven't read..." - I've read the entire article. That the Plantation of Ulster (the official part of it anyway) was instituted by the English crown does not make the flag of England a pertinent symbol for all of the Ulster Scots people into the present day. "those particular flags are not controversial": Your use of them is being controverted by at least
379:
358:
2491:...if there has not been any verifiable information published in reliable sources about the subject, then there is no way to check whether the information in the article is true, and it may damage the reputation of the subject and the project. Even if it is true, without the ability to check it, false information could very well start to seep in.
389:
659:
2364:. Readers should be able to expect that when images of symbols are included in an article about an ethnic group, that's because the symbols concerned represent that group. This isn't established by reliable sources for these symbols, and it appears that even the advocates of their inclusion don't see them all as symbols of the group.
1410:
thing they have in common is some ancestry from
Scotland since the Early Modern period (and not from culturally/ethnically homogenous parts of Scotland; Highlanders are largely of Gaelic and Norse extraction, and Lowlanders largely Anglo-Saxon and Norman, but both supplied large numbers of immigrants to north Ireland).
1187:
thing they have in common is some ancestry from
Scotland since the Early Modern period (and not from culturally/ethnically homogenous parts of Scotland; Highlanders are largely of Gaelic and Norse extraction, and Lowlanders largely Anglo-Saxon and Norman, but both supplied large numbers of immigrants to north Ireland).
2335:, no matter what page it's currently housed in; it is written with flags in general in mind, as is clear from its wording, and blowing up the icons to giant size simply compounds, not lessens, the problems with them). These are not symbols that represent the Ulster Scots, and the notion that they are is
3148:
It appears to me that the Ulster Scots which is outlined by the Ulster Scots society is that these people spoke a variant of Scots from
Scotland and had some of their own specific traditions. What these are, I don't know. The genetics for this is complicated because there is historical migration from
2092:
What this is all boiling down to is people's opinions. Larry says, "I just don't think it belongs". McCandlish says it "seems" inappropriate. The images are of long standing in this article, to illustrate the countries of Ulster Scots' ancestry. It's helpful to illustrate that the ancestry wasn't
1960:
I have no idea what "potentially" wrong means. Something is either right or wrong. The flags reflects the primary countries from which the Ulster Scots came (Scotland and
England), and the place to which they went (Ireland and the province of Ulster). Is this wrong? Again, they are decorative and
1870:
I have several related WP articles that I follow. This is one of them. I've remained quiet about the flag controversy in this article because it doesn't involve anything substantial, but now I have to provide some input about why there might be controversy at all. Mr. McCandlish, you are currently
1284:
instead, and the purpose these are serving in this article is basically that of icons, just large ones. When the guideline intends in particular to address small icons, such as those produced by the flag icon templates, it says so specifically (e.g. in the material about infobox and table usage). All
1183:
Do not use subnational flags without direct relevance: Subnational flags (regions, cities, etc.) should generally be used only when directly relevant to the article. Such flags are rarely recognizable by the general public, detracting from any shorthand utility they might have, and are rarely closely
3144:
This page appears problematic. Is there actual evidence that this identity exists historically? The reason I ask is because I cannot imagine that historically people referred to themselves as /Ulster Scots/. The idea of Ulster Scots appears to be a modern term applied to the group of people who came
2115:
inappropriate, for reasons that multiple editors have explained to you at great length. "To illustrate the countries of 's ancestry" is not an encyclopedic purpose of images. We do not need "a visual representation" of every single thing the article says somewhere in it. Rather than continue to go
1996:
Of the 10 clusters, seven were found to be of "Gaelic" Irish origin and three of mixed Irish and
British ancestry. All of the mixed clusters were located in Northern Ireland. The geographical location of these three groupings, along with estimates of when the population mixing occurred - the 17th to
1709:
Knowledge (XXG) has many policies or what many consider "rules". Instead of following every rule, it is acceptable to use common sense as you go about editing. Being too wrapped up in rules can cause a loss of perspective, so there are times when it is better to ignore a rule. Even if a contribution
3182:
Perhaps more the point, the anon's notion that the article can't exist unless the term was historically used by the first of the people today called Ulster Scots is nonsense to begin with. Our articles are written around the facts and terminology used in reliable modern sources. The anon's position
3080:, the flags don't represent the people and it's difficult to see what they do represent - except being vaguely connected to significant historical phases, but even in that respect, the flags' purpose or role in each phase isn't clear. On balance their presence is more confusing than clarifying IMO.
2404:
of Ulster Scots, as least as they're defined by historians. They are very distantly related to the subject. Their use would serve the opposite of the intended purpose; it'd muddle the issue and give grounds for both malevolent propaganda and groundless animosity among users as well as contributors.
1409:
We've already covered this above, but in short it is not possible for these flags to be directly relative to a group of people scattered over the entire north of the island of
Ireland, of mixed political loyalties and citizenship, and of completely different family-historical backgrounds; the only
1347:
Everything about the flag usage you're trying to insist on is politically laden, from applying a traditional flag of
Ireland to people mostly in Northern Ireland, to using an unofficial Ulster flag that is a Unionist symbol, to applying a Scottish flag to people only descended multi-generationally
1186:
We've already covered this above, but in short it is not possible for these flags to be directly relative to a group of people scattered over the entire north of the island of Ireland, of mixed political loyalties and citizenship, and of completely different family-historical backgrounds; the only
1068:
From what I can tell, the objections to the inclusion of flags are incredibly recent (we've had them on the page since 2009). They don't harm the article, and their long-standing presence suggests implies a long-standing consensus of them being on the page. They take nothing away from the article,
2679:
This is actually rather funny. "...written off as an unreliable source in general. Although some of its pages might refer to reliable sources, it is self-published content without editorial oversight..." That description could apply to Knowledge (XXG) itself. Knowledge (XXG) editors, after all,
1975:
Inclusion of flags in an article about an ethnic group suggests that those flags are recognised symbols of the group. I wrote "potentially wrong" because I don't know whether the St George's Cross is recognised by anyone as a symbol of Ulster Scots - it seems a bit unlikely to me but it's hard to
964:
I know there was an earlier discussion of a misused flag image, but I'm wondering why all the flags are currently even in this article. They don't seem to illustrate the article in any way, but just fill space. I think they should be removed. There is no official flag for Ulster Scots identity as
2339:
not backed up by reliable sourcing. These big flag images are serving nothing but a decoration purpose at best, and are apt to spark politicised controversy because of general sore feelings when it comes to flags and Ulster. And the entire notion is a major confusion of the idea of a nation or
1889:
bollocks. There is absolutely no – even theoretical – connection between how to spell a term for an American (and Canadian) diasporic ethnic group, and whether to inject a bunch of flags into an Ulster article after years and years of people losing it over inappropriate flags in Ulster articles.
1201:
Do not rewrite history: Flags should not be used to misrepresent the nationality of a historical figure, event, object, etc. Political boundaries change, often over the span of a biographical article subject's lifetime. Where ambiguity or confusion could result, it is better not to use a flag at
1116:
Entities without flags until after a certain point in time: Some subnational entities have not had flags until recently (e.g. the Welsh flag has only been official since 1959). While this flag can still represent Wales generally, it should not be used to represent the country when the context is
2185:
What are you talking about? It's certainly a "rule", at the same level that any other WP guideline is a rule. It may not be as hard-and-fast a rule as a policy, but transgressing a guideline still requires a really compelling it-objectively-improves-the-encyclopedia reason to do it, and no such
1109:
It may in some narrow military history circumstances be appropriate to use flags, as they were used at the time being written about, including naval ensigns.... An example might be an in-depth exploration of a famous battle involving numerous forces with known flags; such flags might be used in
3167:
I once heard someone try to argue that there were no Germans before 1870, when the various kingdoms and principalities were united as the German Empire, which is of course nonsense. Similarly, to say that there were no Ulster Scots before the Partition of Ireland in 1921, is equally strange.
895:
What exactly is Protestant Scottish traditional music? As someone who has played Gaelic Traditional Music (Scottish/Irish/Manx/Cape Breton) for 10 years, I have never heard of this genre and am interested to learn more. I suggest deleting this. I also know many Prodestants from Ulster who play
3191:
is an invalid article because all the peoples classified as Slavic by anthropologists today did not historically call themselves by that name or consider themselves to belong to such a grouping. Also, the genetic argument introduced by the anon is meaningless. DNA heritage (which no one knew
1095:
Flag icons may be relevant in some subject areas, where the subject actually represents that country or nationality – such as military units or national sports teams. ... Terms such as "country" and "nation" as used should be understood to also apply to other uses of flags, such as national
1102:
Use a historical flag and associated country name when they have at least a semi-officially applicable rationale to use them. For example, in lists of Olympic medalists, the USSR flag and country name should be used for reporting before 1992, not those of the Russian Federation or the
1162:
Flags are visually striking, and placing a national flag next to something can make its nationality or location seem to be of greater significance than other things. ... Emphasizing the importance of a person's citizenship or nationality above their other qualities risks violating
1458:"Absolutely no idea ..." Clearly. That you fail to understand, and just hand-wave to avoid, the arguments presented to you does not make the arguments wrong. Ditto for "This is talking tangentially to the point" and "I really don't follow this reasoning at all". That you don't
2950:
That's a red herring, we're not discussing voluntary political or sporting affiliations. The flags are non-controversial symbols of the groups that were responsible for the ethnogenesis of the Ulster Scots - and the selection of those groups are supported by reliable sources.
1674:
Yes. Flags are representative of nation-states. However this is an article about a people not a nation-state. Not a locale. Not a municipality. And not an ideal. It is an article about a people. Flags don't represent a people. As mentioned, including the flags here is failing
1400:
That's basically what's going on here. Because of MOS:NOETHNICGALLERIES, you are trying to just "decorate" the article by jamming images into it, and have inappropriately selected flags, which are subject to a lot of "regulation" on Knowledge (XXG) that you've not bothered to
1894:
also noticed and entered these discussions because they have a bunch of articles on their watchlist? Or are you just magically special? To return the actual substance of this thread: "Whether or not there are flag images in this doesn't matter to the content." That's an
1204:. These flags do misrepresent nationality, and the actual nationalities to which any given historical Ulster Scot, or the Ulster Scots as a group, has obviously changed over time (plus some of the flags you're defending the use of are not official symbols at all).
2286:) to illustrate and provide a visual representation of the ancestral countries/provinces of the Ulster Scots? This has been extensively discussed above, but there seem to be too few editors involved yet to put the matter to rest with a clear enough consensus,
2931:
Of course, it "harms" the article. More precisely, the inclusion of symbols not expressly used to denote the ethnic group's identity is confusing to the user and unnecessarily muddles the already complex history of the subject. Many Ulster Scots support the
1644:. They're being used for purely decorative reasons, they are not referenced in the text and are not supporting the text. Additionally having them implies that they represent the people in the text, which they don't. This is about a people, not a country.
1273:
Nope. Nothing in the wording of it suggests that at all, everything it says about the problems of using flags having nothing to do with their size, it's in that particular guideline for lack of better place to put it (though it arguably could be moved
2864:. The "wiki-types" well, they are not; and this makes them unusable here. It's actually very surprising that you are ready to pull down the Knowledge (XXG) project's foundational policies in order to open the way for any and all. But, explicitly,
3227:
Yeah, but this article promotes a blood fantasy that this group remained "culturally" and "ethnically" distinct from the local Irish population (and misuses the word "ethnic"), which is clearly nonsense and not consistent with some of the latest
1765:). Yes, it is "acceptable to use common sense as you go about editing"; no one is expected to memorize all WP rules, and doing so is not required to make an edit. What is not acceptable is to editwar against all comers to preserve your personal
3231:. You also list "English" and "Scottish" as related ethnic groups but leave out "Irish", even though the English and Scottish view these people as Irish. In fact, much of this article promotes what Kerby Miller calls the "two traditions" thesis
2608:
which shows use of the flags of St George, St Andrew, Province of Ulster, and various other flags. And don't say, "But these flags aren't being used to represent Ulster Scots". Who else would be flying these flags in Ulster? Puerto Ricans?
1418:
This doesn't pertain in a literal sense, but it does in an in-spirit on, since you are attempting to use these flags as catch-all symbols for diverse people who cross national boundaries; essentially making up a supranational use for these
1748:
material that now exists against it' is never a reason for any P&G material to not be applied to applicable content. Let's not be silly. Never in the history of Knowledge (XXG) has such an argument ever been accepted. Cf.
1479:"No, that's not the situation at all." Except it demonstrably is. I'll quote someone else who reverted you: "Fails MOS:FLAG and MOS:IMAGERELEVANCE. Images are not mentioned in the text, so are not illustrating the text."
986:
I'm also curious - removing them outright messes with the formatting a bit but I am strongly tempted to do so given it's been brought up a couple times on the talk page and as far as I can tell no one has defended them.
153:
1469:"You are aware that there is a distinction between 'listening' and 'agreeing' right?" Your failure to address the substance of most of the arguments is a failure to listen and engage, not a substantive disagreement.
2991:. Ethnic groups might have -they usually have- a complex and varied ethnic history but we do not put up symbols of every one of their ancestral tribes. Why? Because it's essentially an exercise in irrelevance and
1217:
principles with regard to "biographies" and "sub-national entities" in particular need to be edited to be a little clearer that they apply to ethnic groups, just to forestall anything like this coming up again.
1179:, you are trying to just "decorate" the article by jamming images into it, and have inappropriately selected flags, which are subject to a lot of "regulation" on Knowledge (XXG) that you've not bothered to read.
1712:" You are advocating the removal of a decades-long inclusion which doesn't damage the usability or usefulness of the article and which has been included on this article page for as long as the MOS has existed.
340:
1703:" - nations are a people, and we are talking about a people and their ethnogenesis. Even if the inclusion failed the MOS (which for the record I don't agree that it does), you need to take account of the
3574:
2507:
The quote seems to work against your Yes suggestion. By inserting the symbols without sources that support their use by the subject group, we risk, if not assure, that "false information will seep in."
1193:. This doesn't pertain in a literal sense, but it does in an in-spirit on, since you are attempting to use these flags as catch-all symbols for diverse people who cross national boundaries; essentially
330:
1553:, making it clear that the rules do not apply to larger images. Possibly the community shares your view, but until the Manual of Style is changed what matters is the guidelines as they're written.
1323:
Nothing like that applies here, to create a big vertical gallery of flags, as Ulster Scots are not formal representatives, like a sports team, of anywhere or "anywhen" to which those flags pertain.
1105:
Nothing like that applies here, to create a big vertical gallery of flags, as Ulster Scots are not formal representatives, like a sports team, of anywhere or "anywhen" to which those flags pertain.
3569:
3515:
The lead says, "or, in North America, Scotch-Irish." I cannot access the source, but it seems that the normal term in Canada is Ulster-Scots and before that they were just referred to as Irish.
306:
1339:
Ulster Scots have no flag that pertains to them in particular at all, and do not form a jurisdiction of any kind, much less a sub-national political entity to which a flag applies, now or ever.
1119:
Ulster Scots have no flag that pertains to them in particular at all, and do not form a jurisdiction of any kind, much less a sub-national political entity to which a flag applies, now or ever.
3584:
3153:
435:
1455:
editors (one in great detail), so your claim of lack of controversy is false on its face. (Ditto for "What you've described as a 'politicised editorial controversy' is not reflected...").
3604:
1903:. "Maybe they are just decorative." That's another perfect reason to remove them, per the general image use guidelines not just the flag-specific one. "They aren't hurting anything":
1384:
This is clearly politicised and has raised editorial controversy; there's no reason to think this MoS principle doesn't apply to mass-biographical articles and only to individual bios.
1149:
This is clearly politicised and has raised editorial controversy; there's no reason to think this MoS principle doesn't apply to mass-biographical articles and only to individual bios.
742:
297:
274:
3579:
2443:- it offers precisely no harm to the article and suggestion that the symbols are not relevant to the group is not accurate given the sources provided and the history of the group.
690:
1849:
ping, so you can let us know if you've changed your mind in the interim. In absence of their renewed participation here, however, their concerns have to be taken at face value.
715:
705:
445:
147:
896:
Irish/Scottish trad music and doubt that you can desect Ulster Scots, Irish, Scottish, Scottish Protestants, Scottish hythens, and Scottish Catholics along music lines.
198:
2699:
2605:
1147:
Avoid flag usage, especially to present a point of view, that is likely to raise editorial controversy over political or other factual matters about a biography subject.
720:
710:
1810:
The 'length of time' point was primarily about challenging the idea that the flags need to be removed; it wasn't attempting to answer the question about verifiability.
639:
3589:
3619:
3229:
629:
411:
755:
2783:
OK. I'll give way to the gate-keepers of Knowledge (XXG) rule integrity. You folks are right. It's all about officious bureaucracy. I should have known.
79:
3097:, the flags aren't related to the ethic group, and as such, should not be included in the article because of the very likely potential of confusing readers.
2766:
1145:. This is actually worse, using it to represent people who are not even limited to Northern Ireland but also found in the RoI, especially Donegal. See also
869:
3624:
3614:
3398:– Something about the "back end" of the disaporic process. Part of a series that also includes volumes on Renfrewshire, Dumfries and Galloway, Lanarkshire.
44:
605:
550:
2761:. And shows that, at the very least, you have not understood why Knowledge (XXG) proclaims itself as unreliable. As to consensus, good luck tearing down
1928:
The idea that having potentially wrong information in an encyclopedia article (not a "group" - this isn't social media) doesn't do any harm is worrying.
1123:
Political issues: Beware of political pitfalls, and listen to concerns raised by other editors. Some flags are (sometimes or always) political statements
700:
1544:: While icons can be useful in Knowledge (XXG) articles in some circumstances, there are also problems associated with their misapplication and overuse.
604:, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
3634:
3599:
2536:
You have sources that Ulster Scots have some ancestry from places represented by such flags, not that they use these flags as group self-identifiers.
1462:
the relevance doesn't mean the relavance is not there, and just declaring something irrelevant to you doesn't address the concern raised at all. It's
1348:
from Scots, to adding the flag of England which really has nothing to do with Ulster Scots or Ulster at all (the English flag is not the Union Jack).
859:
540:
402:
363:
751:
85:
3639:
1567:
Correct, (and I mistyped in an edit summary also), MOS:FLAGS is only pertaining to the use of the flag icons. This discussion is more related to
1990:
No one asserted that the St George's Cross was a symbol of the Ulster Scots, it's a symbol of England - and a link to England is justified by a
1372:
This is actually worse, using it to represent people who are not even limited to Northern Ireland but also found in the RoI, especially Donegal.
3629:
3609:
3232:
2426:, summarised as "illustrate, not decorate". So which part of the article do the flags illustrate? Or where to they replace a thousand words? --
835:
663:
596:
573:
3594:
1173:
Do not use a flag when a picture of the subject is not available: A flag (or other symbolic image) should not be used as an image placeholder
516:
289:
268:
30:
925:
1386:" What you've described as a 'politicised editorial controversy' is not reflected by the reality of the article and/or the flags used.
3316:
2973:
No herring in this table, I'm afraid; only symiaki garida cooked with cheese, as it happens. (Don't be jealous, now.) These flags are
998:
I removed them, since they don't improve the article in any way and seem to have been added as decoration. We'll see if that sticks.
945:
194:
190:
2071:
groups, just because they are in some sense ancestral to the one that is our subject, seems especially inappropriate and misleading.
99:
3504:
3465:
3446:
3428:
3410:
3391:
3371:
3353:
3335:
3291:
3259:
3203:
3157:
2901:
2820:
2600:
As for whether Ulster Scots actually "use" the crosses of St. George or St Andrew, please see "Flags of the World" (FOTW) regarding
2590:
2547:
2475:
2351:
2309:
2213:
2127:
2082:
2003:" Do we need to have a specific source that proves (for example) that the flag of England is a symbol of England, or can we rely on
1918:
1860:
1780:
1610:
1492:
1300:
1245:
1229:
1139:
Some flags are politically contentious – take care to avoid using them in inappropriate contexts. Some examples are: ... Use of the
1058:
1034:
1009:
2718:
Right. That's my point. So Knowledge (XXG) "consensus" is itself not a reliable source about what is or isn't a reliable source.
2233:
924:
The definition is quite elementary... Irish/Scottish traditional music plus a lambeg drum = Scottish Protestant traditional music!
822:
783:
104:
20:
168:
3248:
Well, our articles don't research and write themselves. Maybe get some books and work their relevant gist into the article. :-)
2740:
2067:
Yes, and it's not clear there even is any image that is widely symbolic of Ulster Scots. But sticking images widely symbolic of
507:
468:
135:
74:
3534:
I copy-edited the lead as it seemed in need of précis and so I removed clutter, duplication, tangents and excessive detail per
1976:
know when there's no reference to a source. I'd also remind you that the standard for inclusion isn't truth but verifiability.
249:
912:
302:
65:
1726:
Regardless of what the MOS says, the inclusion of these flags as representatives of an ethnic group would need sources per
938:
That's not Ulster-Scots that's Irish and Scottish music respectively, you're trying to invent a genre that doesn't exist.
889:
3135:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
2809:
is a published work. A Knowledge (XXG) consensus is a decision-making process. Not meaningfully comparable in any way.
3485:
3481:
1069:
and their presence is not in breach of any wiki rules - therefore I don't agree that it is legitimate to remove them.
2992:
2865:
2021:
No, but if it was just included as a symbol of England, then I don't think it belongs in an article on Ulster Scots.
129:
2852:, is user generated, well described by you as a "wiki-type" site. Note the extremely significant difference between
2388:
2175:
1844:
988:
206:
185:
2695:
2381:
not in the way they were included. They were just not informative to the relevant text and potentially misleading.
2093:
all Ulster or all Scot. It already says so in the article, but the flags give a visual representation of this.
109:
3551:
3520:
3477:
3026:
2708:
2665:
2267:
2255:
1685:
1650:
1577:
2736:
1766:
1463:
217:
125:
2748:
2369:
2058:
2026:
1981:
1937:
1735:
3535:
1206:
Flags make simple, blunt statements about nationality, while words can express the facts with more complexity.
255:
237:
1595:
for a lack of better place to put it, and most of it is general, about flag usage at all. When it means flag
1445:
in a hand-wave manner that something it's applicable doesn't explain or demonstrate that it isn't applicable.
949:
929:
394:
2108:
1750:
941:
900:
175:
3489:
2805:
for the formal process). That doesn't make it a "source" that itself can be determined reliable or not. A
2557:
Nobody is claiming that Ulster Scots use these flags as self-identifiers, so please stop repeating this..
677:
1331:
Ulster Scots are not a military unit, and this is nothing like use of small identifying flags in a table.
1112:
Ulster Scots are not a military unit, and this is nothing like use of small identifying flags in a table.
55:
3501:
3256:
3239:
3200:
2898:
2817:
2587:
2544:
2472:
2348:
2306:
2210:
2124:
2079:
1915:
1857:
1777:
1607:
1489:
1297:
1242:
1226:
1176:
1055:
1031:
1006:
834:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
515:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
410:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
305:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1758:
70:
3235:
3547:
3516:
3021:
2703:
2660:
2251:
1997:
18th Centuries - led the researchers to surmise that this was related to the Ulster Plantation, when
1680:
1660:
The flags are representative of nation-states - they are both representations of nations and states.
1645:
1572:
1441:"Again, not relevant" - Ditto. And so on. I'm going to skip the rest of these pseudo-arguments. Just
2191:
2035:
Why? Does that source not demonstrate a verifiable link to England (and Scotland) for Ulster Scots?
1472:"The Ulster Banner is not on the page" - The "traditional" variant of it you're using is covered at
3066:
3000:
2941:
2873:
2774:
2744:
2513:
2410:
2365:
2054:
2022:
1977:
1933:
1837:, Alssa1 has implied that the previous editors who raised these concerns no longer share them. So:
1731:
1351:
161:
24:
2486:
2461:
1929:
1904:
1762:
1745:
1727:
1704:
3218:
3173:
3085:
3044:
2788:
2723:
2685:
2614:
2562:
2324:
2098:
2050:
1966:
1876:
1676:
1641:
1568:
1558:
1264:
908:
222:
141:
2116:
in circles with you, I'm just going to open an RfC on the matter and get more community input.
3462:
3443:
3425:
3407:
3404:
The Plantation of Ulster: The British Colonization of the North of Ireland in the 17th Century
3388:
3368:
3350:
3332:
3313:
3288:
3054:
831:
51:
3306:
2656:
2576:
2111:
argument, one of the classic "arguments to avoid". I used "seems" to be polite. They clearly
2004:
1164:
3496:
3251:
3195:
2956:
2893:
2812:
2582:
2539:
2527:
2498:
2467:
2448:
2343:
2301:
2275:
2205:
2119:
2074:
2040:
2012:
1951:
1910:
1852:
1815:
1799:
1772:
1717:
1665:
1602:
1484:
1426:
1292:
1237:
1221:
1110:
summary tables to make it clearer which force was being referred to for a particular detail.
1074:
1050:
1026:
1001:
407:
219:
2887:
2883:
2853:
2802:
2572:
2199:
2187:
1791:
1754:
1154:
3121:
2279:
1991:
976:
814:
731:
2857:
2336:
1438:"This is not relevant to the use case" - Just an assertion that makes no actual argument.
1194:
3062:
2996:
2937:
2869:
2770:
2509:
2406:
2385:
2271:
2202:
concerns about mis-applying nationalistic and controversial labels to an ethnic group.
2172:
499:
2987:
2861:
2250:
The rough consensus was that the flags should not be used and they have been removed.
2195:
3563:
3214:
3184:
3169:
3081:
3040:
2849:
2784:
2758:
2732:
2719:
2681:
2655:
Flags of the World has long been declared a completely unusable non-reliable site at
2610:
2558:
2431:
2094:
1962:
1872:
1554:
1473:
1366:" You are aware that there is a distinction between 'listening' and 'agreeing' right?
1260:
1140:
904:
2571:
Please stop ignoring that applying flags to people who don't use them is an obvious
2400:. The aforementioned symbols do not denote the subject of the article, which is the
3323:– Covers the Plantation of Ulster through American emigration and early US history.
2933:
2601:
2401:
1435:"No one is asserting that they are" - But you're misusing the flags as if they are.
601:
588:
567:
1899:
rationale for deleting them, and a point made both by myself and and others, e.g.
1697:
The flags are representative of nation-states - they are both representations of
2952:
2798:
2523:
2494:
2444:
2036:
2008:
1947:
1811:
1795:
1713:
1710:"violates" the precise wording of a rule, it might still be a good contribution.
1661:
1422:
1358:
on 'relatedness'; the reasons for those particular flags are not controversial.
1070:
1044:
1946:
Sorry what is the 'potentially wrong information' you're referring to exactly?
798:
777:
221:
3555:
3524:
3509:
3422:
The Scot in Ulster: Sketch of the History of the Scottish Population of Ulster
3285:
The Scot in Ulster: Sketch of the History of the Scottish Population of Ulster
3264:
3243:
3222:
3208:
3177:
3161:
3125:
3114:
3089:
3070:
3048:
3031:
3004:
2960:
2945:
2906:
2877:
2825:
2792:
2778:
2752:
2727:
2713:
2689:
2670:
2618:
2595:
2566:
2552:
2531:
2517:
2502:
2480:
2452:
2435:
2423:
2414:
2392:
2373:
2356:
2314:
2259:
2218:
2179:
2132:
2102:
2087:
2062:
2044:
2030:
2016:
1985:
1970:
1955:
1941:
1923:
1886:
1880:
1865:
1840:
1819:
1803:
1790:
Accusing me of an edit war is not legitimate in the slightest, the process is
1785:
1739:
1721:
1690:
1669:
1655:
1615:
1582:
1562:
1497:
1430:
1364:
And you are certainly not "listen to concerns raised by other editors" so far.
1305:
1281:
1268:
1250:
1078:
1063:
1047:, what is your reasoning, in the face of objections from three other editors?
1039:
1014:
993:
980:
969:
953:
933:
916:
804:
489:
483:
462:
384:
1310:
Every supposed problem you're citing is not relevant to the subject/use case:
1169:
This clearly pertains even more to applying flags to entire groups of people.
2382:
2328:
2169:
2161:
1592:
1536:
1256:
1214:
1088:
697:
Articles about ethnic groups that currently have issues needing resolution:
3546:, "you better discuss this first onb the talkpage". And so here we are...
3385:
Scotland During the Plantation of Ulster: The People of Ayrshire, 1600-1699
1476:
and is also controverial for same socio-political reasons as the white one.
691:
Resolve the disparity in importance rankings among different ethnic groups
3539:
2427:
827:
600:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to
2168:
a rule! Really don't know why there are people who still don't get that.
1133:
a flag is felt to be necessary, it should be that of the sovereign state
512:
2053:). Better to include images widely agreed to be symbols of the group.
658:
1153:
Inappropriate use: Do not emphasize nationality without good reason.
3329:
The Scotch-Irish: From the North of Ireland to the Making of America
1730:. Having been in the article for a long time doesn't obviate that.
1259:
applies specifically to flag icons, and these images aren't icons.
1129:
Use of flags for non-sovereign states and nations: ... In general,
378:
357:
3347:
Ulster to America: The Scots-Irish Migration Experience, 1680–1830
3188:
2331:(which, contrary to Alssa1's belief above, is not limited to flag
3459:
Ireland in the Virginian Sea: Colonialism in the British Atlantic
2856:
and this type of "wiki-type" sites: Knowledge (XXG) is all about
3300:
More about out-migration of Ulster Scots to the Americas, etc.:
725:
231:
223:
15:
1394:" Absolutely no idea how you're arriving at that conclusion.
1098:. Ulster Scots are not the repesenatives of any jurisdiction.
2845:
3187:
because the ancient Egyptians didn't call it that, or that
2493:" - it's a little bit more nuanced than you're making out.
1315:
Ulster Scots are not the repesenatives of any jurisdiction.
1255:
I don't think this is correct. Its name notwithstanding,
743:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Ethnic groups/Article requests
315:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom
2993:
Knowledge (XXG) is not a collection of random information
2866:
Knowledge (XXG) is not a repository of random information
2680:
aren't really editors. They are just self-publishers.
3105:, I started the latest thread and gave my opinion there.
2194:
decorating", especially when the case in point involves
1374:" The Ulster Banner is not on the page, and there was a
3543:
2283:
1900:
1835:
1588:
1191:
Do not use supranational flags without direct relevance
1143:
to represent Northern Ireland in inappropriate contexts
1020:
3575:
Low-importance Politics of the United Kingdom articles
1208:
That's the nutshell summary of the overall issue here.
1155:
Knowledge (XXG) is not a place for nationalistic pride
160:
1087:
in breach of wiki rules. You appear not to have read
2232:
The following discussion is an archived record of a
1175:. That's basically what's going on here. Because of
1117:
specifically about a time period predating the flag.
826:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
716:
Category:Ethnic groups articles needing reassessment
706:
Category:Ethnic groups articles needing merge action
511:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
406:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
301:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
3570:
Start-Class Politics of the United Kingdom articles
3461:. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
3312:. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
2242:
No further edits should be made to this discussion.
1999:
English and Scottish Protestants settled in Ireland
1539:makes it very clear that it applies only to icons:
1378:
to not use a similarly-sectarian flag back in 2007.
318:
Template:WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom
174:
3305:
3168:Actually, they were the reason for the Partition.
3585:High-importance Northern Ireland-related articles
3472:– Has at least some material on the Ulster Scots.
3453:– Has at least some material on the Ulster Scots.
721:Category:Ethnic groups articles needing attention
711:Category:Ethnic groups articles needing infoboxes
3365:Ulster Emigration to Colonial America, 1718–1785
1213:This discussion suggests to me that some of the
1165:Knowledge (XXG)'s "Neutral point of view" policy
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
3605:Start-Class Ireland articles of High-importance
3234:, which I do not believe is a mainstream view.
1421:" I really don't follow this reasoning at all.
3486:Talk:Scotch-Irish Canadians#Additional sources
3482:Talk:Scotch-Irish Americans#Additional sources
3183:is rather like arguing that we have to delete
2340:other polity, versus that of an ethnic group.
1023:, but has not provided any kind of rationale.
3580:Start-Class Northern Ireland-related articles
2769:manifesto? We have enough or them already.) -
2245:A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
1640:I've removed the flags, they completely fail
965:much as some people would wish there were. —
687:of articles within the scope of this project.
8:
3478:Talk:Plantation of Ulster#Additional sources
2225:RfC on inclusion of ancestral national flags
1412:" This is talking tangentially to the point.
1275:
420:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Northern Ireland
2700:WP:Knowledge (XXG) is not a reliable source
2293:
2287:
2186:reason is presented here. You can't invoke
235:
2985:of those flags represent them. And that's
2739:as your comments are starting to get into
1587:Except it's not. I already addressed this
1355:
939:
772:
701:Category:Unassessed Ethnic groups articles
647:
562:
457:
352:
298:WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom
263:
3490:Talk:Scottish diaspora#Additional sources
614:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Ethnic groups
2190:with a rationale that boils down to "I
2160:To clarify, I want to stress here that
1403:" No, that's not the situation at all.
1325:" This is not relevant to the use-case.
1285:the other material is about flag usage
774:
564:
459:
354:
321:Politics of the United Kingdom articles
265:
3590:All WikiProject Northern Ireland pages
3512:; rev'd. 13:30, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
3442:. Southern Illinois University Press.
3440:New Perspectives on the Irish Diaspora
1547:
1540:
1341:" Again, not relevant to the use case
1205:
1200:
1190:
1184:related to the subject of the article.
1182:
1172:
1161:
1152:
1146:
1138:
1128:
1122:
1115:
1108:
1101:
1094:
3620:Mid-importance Ethnic groups articles
2602:"political flags" in Northern Ireland
890:Protestant Scottish traditional music
651:WikiProject Ethnic groups open tasks:
423:Template:WikiProject Northern Ireland
7:
3154:2A02:C7F:864B:CC00:448:3A75:4733:353
2936:. Should we put up a Rangers flag? -
1317:" No one is asserting that they are.
1197:a supranational use for these flags.
844:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Scotland
820:This article is within the scope of
594:This article is within the scope of
505:This article is within the scope of
400:This article is within the scope of
295:This article is within the scope of
2741:Knowledge (XXG):Tendentious editing
525:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Ireland
23:for discussing improvements to the
3625:WikiProject Ethnic groups articles
3615:Start-Class Ethnic groups articles
3308:The Scotch-Irish: A Social History
3059:- to find that other stuff exists!
1932:is a core policy for good reason.
1546:This is followed by a definition,
617:Template:WikiProject Ethnic groups
14:
3349:. University of Tennessee Press.
426:Northern Ireland-related articles
50:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome!
3635:Mid-importance Scotland articles
3600:High-importance Ireland articles
3367:. Ulster Historical Foundation.
3131:The discussion above is closed.
2606:"Flags Used in Northern Ireland"
2266:Should this article include the
1352:relevant sections of the article
807:
797:
776:
657:
587:
566:
492:
482:
461:
387:
377:
356:
288:
267:
236:
205:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
3304:Leyburn, James Graham (1989) .
1599:specifically, it says "icons".
1591:. The flag material is just in
864:This article has been rated as
634:This article has been rated as
545:This article has been rated as
440:This article has been rated as
335:This article has been rated as
3640:All WikiProject Scotland pages
3438:Fanning, Charles, ed. (2000).
3090:05:40, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
3071:12:34, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
3049:20:53, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
3032:14:01, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
3005:15:08, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
2961:13:46, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
2907:01:49, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
2878:18:11, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
2826:01:49, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
2793:22:57, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
2779:18:11, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
2765:. (What is this? Some kind of
2753:15:38, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
2728:14:43, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
2714:14:18, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
2698:. Which is exactly the reason
2690:13:50, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
2671:13:33, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
2619:12:49, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
2596:03:58, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
2567:02:26, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
2553:21:02, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
2532:13:44, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
2284:in this version of the article
1234:18:38, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
312:Politics of the United Kingdom
303:Politics of the United Kingdom
275:Politics of the United Kingdom
254:It is of interest to multiple
1:
3630:Start-Class Scotland articles
3610:All WikiProject Ireland pages
3525:21:18, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
3494:
3249:
3223:02:40, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
3209:22:17, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
3193:
2946:20:27, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
2891:
2810:
2580:
2537:
2518:20:27, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
2503:20:13, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
2481:18:35, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
2465:
2464:, classic argument to avoid.
2453:16:29, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
2436:14:12, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
2415:12:48, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
2393:08:34, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
2374:06:39, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
2357:06:34, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
2341:
2315:06:34, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
2299:
2270:, the traditional provincial
2219:21:52, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
2203:
2180:08:24, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
2133:06:34, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
2117:
2103:02:38, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
2088:21:23, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
2072:
2063:20:18, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
2045:20:11, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
2031:19:57, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
2017:19:54, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
1986:18:32, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
1971:21:06, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
1956:18:53, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
1942:08:54, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
1924:01:19, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
1908:
1881:22:43, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
1866:22:03, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
1850:
1820:18:58, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
1804:19:05, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
1786:22:03, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
1770:
1744:And 'this stuff preceded the
1740:21:35, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
1722:21:24, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
1691:20:49, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
1670:20:41, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
1656:20:36, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
1616:20:49, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
1600:
1583:20:37, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
1563:20:33, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
1498:20:47, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
1482:
1431:20:19, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
1306:19:42, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
1290:
1269:18:55, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
1251:18:38, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
1235:
1219:
1079:14:43, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
1064:00:03, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
1048:
1040:00:01, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
1024:
999:
847:Template:WikiProject Scotland
838:and see a list of open tasks.
608:and see a list of open tasks.
519:and see a list of open tasks.
414:and see a list of open tasks.
309:and see a list of open tasks.
42:Put new text under old text.
3595:Start-Class Ireland articles
3345:Hofstra, Warren R. (2021) .
3265:13:31, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
3244:06:21, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
3178:21:45, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
2977:being used to represent the
2522:But they do have sources...
1551:encompasses any small images
528:Template:WikiProject Ireland
403:WikiProject Northern Ireland
3510:20:23, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
3387:. Genealogical Publishing.
2844:The content of the website
2757:This is truly astonishing,
2702:and can't be used as such.
1158:. Clear FAIL on that count.
1015:19:43, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
994:05:10, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
954:22:39, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
934:14:44, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
3656:
3538:and the other guidance of
3402:Bardon, Jonathan (2013) .
2049:It's not relevant enough (
870:project's importance scale
640:project's importance scale
551:project's importance scale
446:project's importance scale
341:project's importance scale
3556:12:49, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
3126:02:41, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
2735:, if I were you, I would
2268:Royal Standard of Ireland
2260:12:39, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
1392:Clear FAIL on that count.
1375:
981:16:34, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
917:19:35, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
863:
792:
664:WikiProject Ethnic groups
646:
633:
597:WikiProject Ethnic groups
582:
544:
477:
439:
372:
334:
283:
262:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
3457:Horning, Audrey (2012).
3420:Harrison, John (2018) .
3406:. Gill & MacMillan.
3283:Harrison, John (2018) .
3162:19:16, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
3133:Please do not modify it.
2239:Please do not modify it.
1992:previously quoted source
3363:Dickson, R. J. (2010).
3327:Chepesiuk, Ron (2005).
3140:Does this really exist?
1542:This page in a nutshell
1350:" You haven't read the
1333:" Again, not relevant.
832:Scotland-related topics
395:Northern Ireland portal
3383:Dobson, David (2009).
2882:Or in short form: see
2294:
2288:
1276:
620:Ethnic groups articles
244:This article is rated
75:avoid personal attacks
1845:LookOnMyEditsYeMighty
1792:BOLD, revert, discuss
1177:MOS:NOETHNICGALLERIES
990:LookOnMyEditsYeMighty
248:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
199:Auto-archiving period
100:Neutral point of view
3152:Just some thoughts.
823:WikiProject Scotland
105:No original research
3424:. Forgotten Books.
3287:. Forgotten Books.
2694:Completely correct
2234:request for comment
1356:extended discussion
756:discuss these tasks
662:Here are some open
508:WikiProject Ireland
25:Ulster Scots people
3277:Additional sources
2846:Flags of the World
2325:MOS:IMAGERELEVANCE
2051:MOS:IMAGERELEVANCE
1677:MOS:IMAGERELEVANCE
1642:MOS:IMAGERELEVANCE
1569:MOS:IMAGERELEVANCE
739:Start an article:
250:content assessment
86:dispute resolution
47:
3542:. This edit was
1885:That's a load of
1466:dismissivemeness.
956:
944:comment added by
920:
903:comment added by
884:
883:
880:
879:
876:
875:
850:Scotland articles
771:
770:
767:
766:
763:
762:
561:
560:
557:
556:
456:
455:
452:
451:
351:
350:
347:
346:
230:
229:
66:Assume good faith
43:
3647:
3508:
3471:
3452:
3434:
3416:
3397:
3377:
3359:
3341:
3322:
3311:
3297:
3263:
3207:
3124:
3119:
3113:
2905:
2858:reliable sources
2824:
2594:
2551:
2479:
2355:
2313:
2297:
2291:
2276:Scottish Saltire
2241:
2217:
2131:
2107:You're making a
2086:
1922:
1864:
1848:
1784:
1695:And as I said: "
1614:
1496:
1304:
1279:
1249:
1233:
1062:
1038:
1013:
991:
979:
974:
968:
919:
897:
852:
851:
848:
845:
842:
817:
812:
811:
810:
801:
794:
793:
788:
780:
773:
685:on the talk page
682:
676:
661:
648:
622:
621:
618:
615:
612:
591:
584:
583:
578:
570:
563:
533:
532:
531:Ireland articles
529:
526:
523:
502:
497:
496:
495:
486:
479:
478:
473:
465:
458:
428:
427:
424:
421:
418:
417:Northern Ireland
408:Northern Ireland
397:
392:
391:
390:
381:
374:
373:
368:
364:Northern Ireland
360:
353:
323:
322:
319:
316:
313:
292:
285:
284:
279:
271:
264:
247:
241:
240:
232:
224:
210:
209:
200:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
3655:
3654:
3650:
3649:
3648:
3646:
3645:
3644:
3560:
3559:
3532:
3468:
3456:
3449:
3437:
3431:
3419:
3413:
3401:
3394:
3382:
3374:
3362:
3356:
3344:
3338:
3326:
3319:
3303:
3294:
3282:
3279:
3213:Totally agree.
3142:
3137:
3136:
3120:
3117:
3111:
3023:Canterbury Tail
2934:Glascow Rangers
2854:Knowledge (XXG)
2737:drop this stick
2705:Canterbury Tail
2662:Canterbury Tail
2280:flag of England
2262:
2237:
2227:
1838:
1767:WP:RIGHTVERSION
1682:Canterbury Tail
1647:Canterbury Tail
1574:Canterbury Tail
1464:WP:ICANTHEARYOU
1454:
1451:
989:
975:
972:
966:
962:
898:
893:
849:
846:
843:
840:
839:
815:Scotland portal
813:
808:
806:
786:
732:Peruvian people
680:
674:
619:
616:
613:
610:
609:
576:
547:High-importance
530:
527:
524:
521:
520:
498:
493:
491:
472:High‑importance
471:
442:High-importance
425:
422:
419:
416:
415:
393:
388:
386:
367:High‑importance
366:
320:
317:
314:
311:
310:
277:
245:
226:
225:
220:
197:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
3653:
3651:
3643:
3642:
3637:
3632:
3627:
3622:
3617:
3612:
3607:
3602:
3597:
3592:
3587:
3582:
3577:
3572:
3562:
3561:
3536:WP:LEADCLUTTER
3531:
3528:
3493:
3474:
3473:
3466:
3454:
3447:
3435:
3429:
3417:
3411:
3399:
3392:
3380:
3379:
3378:
3372:
3360:
3354:
3342:
3336:
3324:
3318:978-0807842591
3317:
3298:
3292:
3278:
3275:
3274:
3273:
3272:
3271:
3270:
3269:
3268:
3267:
3225:
3141:
3138:
3130:
3129:
3128:
3107:
3106:
3099:
3098:
3092:
3075:
3074:
3073:
3055:I am shocked -
3034:
3014:
3013:
3012:
3011:
3010:
3009:
3008:
3007:
2966:
2965:
2964:
2963:
2928:
2927:
2926:
2925:
2924:
2923:
2922:
2921:
2920:
2919:
2918:
2917:
2916:
2915:
2914:
2913:
2912:
2911:
2910:
2909:
2841:
2840:
2839:
2838:
2837:
2836:
2835:
2834:
2833:
2832:
2831:
2830:
2829:
2828:
2755:
2745:Cordless Larry
2674:
2673:
2636:
2635:
2634:
2633:
2632:
2631:
2630:
2629:
2628:
2627:
2626:
2625:
2624:
2623:
2622:
2621:
2456:
2455:
2438:
2417:
2395:
2376:
2366:Cordless Larry
2359:
2334:
2298:, to move on.
2278:flag, and the
2272:flag of Ulster
2265:
2263:
2249:
2248:
2247:
2228:
2226:
2223:
2222:
2221:
2158:
2157:
2156:
2155:
2154:
2153:
2152:
2151:
2150:
2149:
2148:
2147:
2146:
2145:
2144:
2143:
2142:
2141:
2140:
2139:
2138:
2137:
2136:
2135:
2114:
2070:
2055:Cordless Larry
2023:Cordless Larry
1978:Cordless Larry
1958:
1934:Cordless Larry
1926:
1898:
1893:
1832:
1831:
1830:
1829:
1828:
1827:
1826:
1825:
1824:
1823:
1822:
1808:
1807:
1806:
1732:Cordless Larry
1638:
1637:
1636:
1635:
1634:
1633:
1632:
1631:
1630:
1629:
1628:
1627:
1626:
1625:
1624:
1623:
1622:
1621:
1620:
1619:
1618:
1598:
1517:
1516:
1515:
1514:
1513:
1512:
1511:
1510:
1509:
1508:
1507:
1506:
1505:
1504:
1503:
1502:
1501:
1500:
1480:
1477:
1470:
1467:
1461:
1456:
1452:
1449:
1446:
1444:
1439:
1436:
1414:
1413:
1405:
1404:
1396:
1395:
1388:
1387:
1380:
1379:
1368:
1367:
1360:
1359:
1343:
1342:
1335:
1334:
1327:
1326:
1319:
1318:
1311:
1288:
1211:
1210:
1209:
1198:
1188:
1180:
1170:
1159:
1150:
1136:
1132:
1126:
1120:
1113:
1106:
1099:
1086:
1042:
961:
960:Why the flags?
958:
923:
892:
887:
882:
881:
878:
877:
874:
873:
866:Mid-importance
862:
856:
855:
853:
836:the discussion
819:
818:
802:
790:
789:
787:Mid‑importance
781:
769:
768:
765:
764:
761:
760:
752:edit this list
748:
747:
746:
745:
737:
736:
735:
728:
723:
718:
713:
708:
703:
695:
694:
693:
688:
653:
652:
644:
643:
636:Mid-importance
632:
626:
625:
623:
606:the discussion
592:
580:
579:
577:Mid‑importance
571:
559:
558:
555:
554:
543:
537:
536:
534:
517:the discussion
504:
503:
500:Ireland portal
487:
475:
474:
466:
454:
453:
450:
449:
438:
432:
431:
429:
412:the discussion
399:
398:
382:
370:
369:
361:
349:
348:
345:
344:
337:Low-importance
333:
327:
326:
324:
307:the discussion
293:
281:
280:
278:Low‑importance
272:
260:
259:
253:
242:
228:
227:
218:
216:
215:
212:
211:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3652:
3641:
3638:
3636:
3633:
3631:
3628:
3626:
3623:
3621:
3618:
3616:
3613:
3611:
3608:
3606:
3603:
3601:
3598:
3596:
3593:
3591:
3588:
3586:
3583:
3581:
3578:
3576:
3573:
3571:
3568:
3567:
3565:
3558:
3557:
3553:
3549:
3545:
3541:
3537:
3529:
3527:
3526:
3522:
3518:
3513:
3511:
3506:
3503:
3500:
3499:
3491:
3487:
3483:
3479:
3469:
3467:9781469610726
3464:
3460:
3455:
3450:
3448:9780809323449
3445:
3441:
3436:
3432:
3430:9781330652862
3427:
3423:
3418:
3414:
3412:9780717154470
3409:
3405:
3400:
3395:
3393:9780806353913
3390:
3386:
3381:
3375:
3373:9780901905178
3370:
3366:
3361:
3357:
3355:9781621902638
3352:
3348:
3343:
3339:
3337:9780786422739
3334:
3331:. McFarland.
3330:
3325:
3320:
3315:
3310:
3309:
3302:
3301:
3299:
3295:
3293:9781330652862
3290:
3286:
3281:
3280:
3276:
3266:
3261:
3258:
3255:
3254:
3247:
3246:
3245:
3241:
3237:
3233:
3230:
3226:
3224:
3220:
3216:
3212:
3211:
3210:
3205:
3202:
3199:
3198:
3190:
3186:
3185:Ancient Egypt
3181:
3180:
3179:
3175:
3171:
3166:
3165:
3164:
3163:
3159:
3155:
3150:
3146:
3139:
3134:
3127:
3123:
3116:
3109:
3108:
3104:
3101:
3100:
3096:
3093:
3091:
3087:
3083:
3079:
3076:
3072:
3068:
3064:
3060:
3058:
3052:
3051:
3050:
3046:
3042:
3038:
3035:
3033:
3030:
3029:
3025:
3024:
3019:
3016:
3015:
3006:
3002:
2998:
2994:
2990:
2989:
2984:
2980:
2976:
2972:
2971:
2970:
2969:
2968:
2967:
2962:
2958:
2954:
2949:
2948:
2947:
2943:
2939:
2935:
2930:
2929:
2908:
2903:
2900:
2897:
2896:
2889:
2885:
2881:
2880:
2879:
2875:
2871:
2867:
2863:
2862:verifiability
2859:
2855:
2851:
2847:
2843:
2842:
2827:
2822:
2819:
2816:
2815:
2808:
2804:
2800:
2796:
2795:
2794:
2790:
2786:
2782:
2781:
2780:
2776:
2772:
2768:
2764:
2760:
2756:
2754:
2750:
2746:
2742:
2738:
2734:
2731:
2730:
2729:
2725:
2721:
2717:
2716:
2715:
2712:
2711:
2707:
2706:
2701:
2697:
2693:
2692:
2691:
2687:
2683:
2678:
2677:
2676:
2675:
2672:
2669:
2668:
2664:
2663:
2658:
2654:
2653:
2652:
2651:
2650:
2649:
2648:
2647:
2646:
2645:
2644:
2643:
2642:
2641:
2640:
2639:
2638:
2637:
2620:
2616:
2612:
2607:
2603:
2599:
2598:
2597:
2592:
2589:
2586:
2585:
2578:
2574:
2570:
2569:
2568:
2564:
2560:
2556:
2555:
2554:
2549:
2546:
2543:
2542:
2535:
2534:
2533:
2529:
2525:
2521:
2520:
2519:
2515:
2511:
2506:
2505:
2504:
2500:
2496:
2492:
2488:
2484:
2483:
2482:
2477:
2474:
2471:
2470:
2463:
2460:
2459:
2458:
2457:
2454:
2450:
2446:
2442:
2439:
2437:
2433:
2429:
2425:
2421:
2418:
2416:
2412:
2408:
2403:
2399:
2396:
2394:
2390:
2387:
2384:
2380:
2377:
2375:
2371:
2367:
2363:
2360:
2358:
2353:
2350:
2347:
2346:
2338:
2332:
2330:
2326:
2322:
2319:
2318:
2317:
2316:
2311:
2308:
2305:
2304:
2296:
2290:
2285:
2281:
2277:
2273:
2269:
2261:
2257:
2253:
2246:
2243:
2240:
2235:
2230:
2229:
2224:
2220:
2215:
2212:
2209:
2208:
2201:
2197:
2193:
2189:
2184:
2183:
2182:
2181:
2177:
2174:
2171:
2167:
2163:
2134:
2129:
2126:
2123:
2122:
2112:
2110:
2109:WP:CONTENTAGE
2106:
2105:
2104:
2100:
2096:
2091:
2090:
2089:
2084:
2081:
2078:
2077:
2068:
2066:
2065:
2064:
2060:
2056:
2052:
2048:
2047:
2046:
2042:
2038:
2034:
2033:
2032:
2028:
2024:
2020:
2019:
2018:
2014:
2010:
2006:
2002:
2000:
1993:
1989:
1988:
1987:
1983:
1979:
1974:
1973:
1972:
1968:
1964:
1959:
1957:
1953:
1949:
1945:
1944:
1943:
1939:
1935:
1931:
1927:
1925:
1920:
1917:
1914:
1913:
1906:
1902:
1896:
1891:
1888:
1884:
1883:
1882:
1878:
1874:
1869:
1868:
1867:
1862:
1859:
1856:
1855:
1846:
1842:
1836:
1834:In user talk
1833:
1821:
1817:
1813:
1809:
1805:
1801:
1797:
1793:
1789:
1788:
1787:
1782:
1779:
1776:
1775:
1768:
1764:
1760:
1756:
1752:
1751:WP:CONTENTAGE
1747:
1743:
1742:
1741:
1737:
1733:
1729:
1725:
1724:
1723:
1719:
1715:
1711:
1706:
1702:
1700:
1694:
1693:
1692:
1689:
1688:
1684:
1683:
1678:
1673:
1672:
1671:
1667:
1663:
1659:
1658:
1657:
1654:
1653:
1649:
1648:
1643:
1639:
1617:
1612:
1609:
1606:
1605:
1596:
1594:
1590:
1586:
1585:
1584:
1581:
1580:
1576:
1575:
1570:
1566:
1565:
1564:
1560:
1556:
1552:
1550:
1545:
1543:
1538:
1535:
1534:
1533:
1532:
1531:
1530:
1529:
1528:
1527:
1526:
1525:
1524:
1523:
1522:
1521:
1520:
1519:
1518:
1499:
1494:
1491:
1488:
1487:
1481:
1478:
1475:
1474:Ulster Banner
1471:
1468:
1465:
1459:
1457:
1447:
1442:
1440:
1437:
1434:
1433:
1432:
1428:
1424:
1420:
1415:
1411:
1406:
1402:
1397:
1393:
1389:
1385:
1381:
1377:
1373:
1369:
1365:
1361:
1357:
1353:
1349:
1344:
1340:
1336:
1332:
1328:
1324:
1320:
1316:
1312:
1309:
1308:
1307:
1302:
1299:
1296:
1295:
1286:
1283:
1278:
1272:
1271:
1270:
1266:
1262:
1258:
1254:
1253:
1252:
1247:
1244:
1241:
1240:
1231:
1228:
1225:
1224:
1216:
1212:
1207:
1203:
1199:
1196:
1192:
1189:
1185:
1181:
1178:
1174:
1171:
1168:
1166:
1160:
1157:
1156:
1151:
1148:
1144:
1142:
1141:Ulster Banner
1137:
1134:
1130:
1127:
1124:
1121:
1118:
1114:
1111:
1107:
1104:
1100:
1097:
1093:
1092:
1090:
1084:
1082:
1081:
1080:
1076:
1072:
1067:
1066:
1065:
1060:
1057:
1054:
1053:
1046:
1043:
1041:
1036:
1033:
1030:
1029:
1022:
1018:
1017:
1016:
1011:
1008:
1005:
1004:
997:
996:
995:
992:
985:
984:
983:
982:
978:
971:
959:
957:
955:
951:
947:
943:
936:
935:
931:
927:
926:92.235.178.44
921:
918:
914:
910:
906:
902:
891:
888:
886:
871:
867:
861:
858:
857:
854:
837:
833:
829:
825:
824:
816:
805:
803:
800:
796:
795:
791:
785:
782:
779:
775:
759:
757:
753:
750:Feel free to
744:
741:
740:
738:
734:
733:
729:
727:
724:
722:
719:
717:
714:
712:
709:
707:
704:
702:
699:
698:
696:
692:
689:
686:
679:
678:Ethnic groups
672:
671:
669:
668:
667:
665:
660:
655:
654:
650:
649:
645:
641:
637:
631:
628:
627:
624:
611:Ethnic groups
607:
603:
602:ethnic groups
599:
598:
593:
590:
586:
585:
581:
575:
574:Ethnic groups
572:
569:
565:
552:
548:
542:
539:
538:
535:
518:
514:
510:
509:
501:
490:
488:
485:
481:
480:
476:
470:
467:
464:
460:
447:
443:
437:
434:
433:
430:
413:
409:
405:
404:
396:
385:
383:
380:
376:
375:
371:
365:
362:
359:
355:
342:
338:
332:
329:
328:
325:
308:
304:
300:
299:
294:
291:
287:
286:
282:
276:
273:
270:
266:
261:
257:
251:
243:
239:
234:
233:
214:
213:
208:
204:
196:
192:
189:
187:
183:
182:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
3533:
3514:
3497:
3475:
3458:
3439:
3421:
3403:
3384:
3364:
3346:
3328:
3307:
3284:
3252:
3196:
3151:
3147:
3143:
3132:
3102:
3094:
3077:
3056:
3036:
3027:
3022:
3017:
2986:
2982:
2979:Ulster Scots
2978:
2974:
2894:
2813:
2806:
2767:inclusionist
2762:
2709:
2704:
2666:
2661:
2583:
2540:
2490:
2468:
2440:
2419:
2402:ethnic group
2397:
2378:
2361:
2344:
2320:
2302:
2264:
2244:
2238:
2231:
2206:
2165:
2159:
2120:
2075:
1998:
1995:
1911:
1892:someone else
1853:
1773:
1708:
1698:
1696:
1686:
1681:
1651:
1646:
1603:
1578:
1573:
1548:
1541:
1485:
1417:
1408:
1399:
1391:
1383:
1371:
1363:
1346:
1338:
1330:
1322:
1314:
1293:
1238:
1222:
1096:subdivisions
1051:
1027:
1002:
963:
946:51.37.254.47
940:— Preceding
937:
922:
894:
885:
865:
821:
749:
730:
684:
670:Meta-tasks:
656:
635:
595:
546:
506:
441:
401:
336:
296:
256:WikiProjects
202:
184:
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
3498:SMcCandlish
3253:SMcCandlish
3236:Jonathan f1
3197:SMcCandlish
2988:per sources
2895:SMcCandlish
2814:SMcCandlish
2799:sour grapes
2743:territory.
2584:SMcCandlish
2541:SMcCandlish
2469:SMcCandlish
2345:SMcCandlish
2303:SMcCandlish
2207:SMcCandlish
2121:SMcCandlish
2076:SMcCandlish
1912:SMcCandlish
1854:SMcCandlish
1774:SMcCandlish
1759:WP:CONLEVEL
1604:SMcCandlish
1486:SMcCandlish
1294:SMcCandlish
1239:SMcCandlish
1223:SMcCandlish
1052:SMcCandlish
1028:SMcCandlish
1021:reverted me
1003:SMcCandlish
899:—Preceding
246:Start-class
148:free images
31:not a forum
3564:Categories
3476:See also:
2696:as we know
2424:MOS:IMAGES
2282:(as shown
1887:ad hominem
1746:WP:P&G
1701:and states
1460:understand
1376:discussion
1282:MOS:IMAGES
673:Place the
3063:The Gnome
2997:The Gnome
2938:The Gnome
2870:The Gnome
2771:The Gnome
2579:problem.
2510:The Gnome
2489:states: "
2487:WP:NOHARM
2462:WP:NOHARM
2407:The Gnome
2329:MOS:FLAGS
2192:just like
2162:MOS:FLAGS
1930:WP:VERIFY
1905:WP:NOHARM
1897:excellent
1763:WP:NOHARM
1728:WP:VERIFY
1593:MOS:ICONS
1555:Dan Bloch
1537:MOS:FLAGS
1261:Dan Bloch
1257:MOS:FLAGS
1215:MOS:FLAGS
1195:making up
1089:MOS:FLAGS
683:template
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
3544:reverted
3540:MOS:LEAD
3228:research
3215:Eastcote
3170:Eastcote
3082:Pincrete
3057:shocked!
3053:Well!..
3041:Eastcote
2981:people.
2850:Eastcote
2785:Eastcote
2759:Eastcote
2733:Eastcote
2720:Eastcote
2682:Eastcote
2611:Eastcote
2559:Eastcote
2095:Eastcote
1963:Eastcote
1873:Eastcote
1705:guidance
1443:claiming
1277:en masse
1019:Someone
942:unsigned
913:contribs
905:Zimmer79
901:unsigned
841:Scotland
828:Scotland
784:Scotland
203:365 days
186:Archives
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
2657:WP:RS/P
2577:WP:NPOV
2485:And as
2005:WP:BLUE
1699:nations
1354:or the
868:on the
666:tasks:
638:on the
549:on the
522:Ireland
513:Ireland
469:Ireland
444:on the
339:on the
154:WP refs
142:scholar
3548:Andrew
2953:Alssa1
2888:WP:UGC
2884:WP:SPS
2807:source
2803:WP:RSN
2573:WP:NOR
2524:Alssa1
2495:Alssa1
2445:Alssa1
2428:𝕁𝕄𝔽
2323:, per
2274:, the
2252:Andrew
2200:WP:NOR
2188:WP:IAR
2037:Alssa1
2009:Alssa1
1948:Alssa1
1812:Alssa1
1796:Alssa1
1755:WP:OWN
1714:Alssa1
1662:Alssa1
1423:Alssa1
1419:flags.
1287:at all
1071:Alssa1
1045:Alssa1
252:scale.
126:Google
3189:Slavs
3115:Parsa
2337:WP:OR
2333:icons
2069:other
1841:Parsa
1597:icons
1549:icons
1450:three
1401:read.
1083:They
970:Parsa
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
3552:talk
3530:Lead
3521:talk
3463:ISBN
3444:ISBN
3426:ISBN
3408:ISBN
3389:ISBN
3369:ISBN
3351:ISBN
3333:ISBN
3314:ISBN
3289:ISBN
3240:talk
3219:talk
3174:talk
3158:talk
3122:talk
3086:talk
3067:talk
3045:talk
3028:talk
3001:talk
2983:None
2957:talk
2942:talk
2886:and
2874:talk
2860:and
2797:Cf.
2789:talk
2775:talk
2763:that
2749:talk
2724:talk
2710:talk
2686:talk
2667:talk
2615:talk
2575:and
2563:talk
2528:talk
2514:talk
2499:talk
2449:talk
2432:talk
2422:per
2411:talk
2370:talk
2327:and
2256:talk
2196:WP:V
2099:talk
2059:talk
2041:talk
2027:talk
2013:talk
1982:talk
1967:talk
1952:talk
1938:talk
1901:here
1877:talk
1843:and
1816:talk
1800:talk
1736:talk
1718:talk
1687:talk
1666:talk
1652:talk
1589:here
1579:talk
1559:talk
1453:four
1427:talk
1265:talk
1103:CIS.
1075:talk
977:talk
950:talk
930:talk
909:talk
830:and
726:Iyer
541:High
436:High
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
3550:🐉(
3517:TFD
3507:😼
3262:😼
3206:😼
3037:Yes
2995:. -
2975:not
2904:😼
2868:. -
2823:😼
2593:😼
2550:😼
2478:😼
2441:Yes
2379:No,
2354:😼
2312:😼
2295:con
2292:or
2289:pro
2254:🐉(
2216:😼
2166:NOT
2164:is
2130:😼
2113:are
2085:😼
1994:: "
1921:😼
1863:😼
1783:😼
1707:: "
1613:😼
1495:😼
1416:- "
1407:- "
1398:- "
1390:- "
1382:- "
1370:- "
1362:- "
1345:- "
1337:- "
1329:- "
1321:- "
1313:- "
1303:😼
1280:to
1248:😼
1232:😼
1202:all
1085:are
1061:😼
1037:😼
1012:😼
860:Mid
754:or
630:Mid
331:Low
176:TWL
3566::
3554:)
3523:)
3495:—
3488:,
3484:,
3480:,
3250:—
3242:)
3221:)
3194:—
3176:)
3160:)
3118:☞
3110:—
3103:No
3095:No
3088:)
3078:No
3069:)
3047:)
3018:No
3003:)
2959:)
2944:)
2892:—
2890:.
2876:)
2848:,
2811:—
2791:)
2777:)
2751:)
2726:)
2688:)
2659:.
2617:)
2581:—
2565:)
2538:—
2530:)
2516:)
2501:)
2466:—
2451:)
2434:)
2420:No
2413:)
2398:No
2391:1
2372:)
2362:No
2342:—
2321:No
2300:—
2258:)
2236:.
2204:—
2198:/
2178:1
2118:—
2101:)
2073:—
2061:)
2043:)
2029:)
2015:)
2007:?
1984:)
1969:)
1954:)
1940:)
1909:—
1879:)
1851:—
1818:)
1802:)
1771:—
1757:,
1753:,
1738:)
1720:)
1668:)
1601:—
1571:.
1561:)
1483:—
1429:)
1291:—
1289:.
1267:)
1236:—
1220:—
1131:if
1091:.
1077:)
1049:—
1025:—
1000:—
973:☞
952:)
932:)
915:)
911:•
758:.
681:}}
675:{{
201::
193:,
156:)
54:;
3519:(
3505:¢
3502:☏
3492:.
3470:.
3451:.
3433:.
3415:.
3396:.
3376:.
3358:.
3340:.
3321:.
3296:.
3260:¢
3257:☏
3238:(
3217:(
3204:¢
3201:☏
3172:(
3156:(
3112:★
3084:(
3065:(
3061:-
3043:(
2999:(
2955:(
2940:(
2902:¢
2899:☏
2872:(
2821:¢
2818:☏
2787:(
2773:(
2747:(
2722:(
2684:(
2613:(
2591:¢
2588:☏
2561:(
2548:¢
2545:☏
2526:(
2512:(
2508:-
2497:(
2476:¢
2473:☏
2447:(
2430:(
2409:(
2405:-
2389:x
2386:v
2383:T
2368:(
2352:¢
2349:☏
2310:¢
2307:☏
2214:¢
2211:☏
2176:x
2173:v
2170:T
2128:¢
2125:☏
2097:(
2083:¢
2080:☏
2057:(
2039:(
2025:(
2011:(
2001:.
1980:(
1965:(
1950:(
1936:(
1919:¢
1916:☏
1875:(
1861:¢
1858:☏
1847::
1839:@
1814:(
1798:(
1781:¢
1778:☏
1734:(
1716:(
1664:(
1611:¢
1608:☏
1557:(
1493:¢
1490:☏
1425:(
1301:¢
1298:☏
1263:(
1246:¢
1243:☏
1230:¢
1227:☏
1167:.
1073:(
1059:¢
1056:☏
1035:¢
1032:☏
1010:¢
1007:☏
967:★
948:(
928:(
907:(
872:.
642:.
553:.
448:.
343:.
258:.
195:2
191:1
188::
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.