300:
279:
915:! thanks for pointing this out. Now that i think about it i did have a vague feeling the example messages were a bit too much in terms of detail so Ill probably remove it when i have the time. Regarding oversection I'm not entirely too sure how to deal with that. However, I do believe that the incident was notable enough to warrant addition to the overall article. Would you consider it better to integrate it into the history section or would simplifying the lonsi leak section be enough?
310:
627:
409:
384:
577:
455:
942:
charges" would be an incorrect description as there is a specific legal definition for assault (direct/indirect) under the
Revised Penal Code of the Philippines. The QCPD's charges, per the sources, were for frustrated murder, physical injury, malicious mischief, and illegal possession of ammunition. Again, two separate and unrelated incidents do not warrant a subsection for the sake of having a subsection.
728:. A table will allow room where chapter references may point to portal pages, and allow comments on where a chapter came from, interesting facts or its outcome. A list of notable members is OK, if it is limited to those with their own valid wikipedia pages; if creating this, publish a list of rules for inclusion on the Talk page, which define who may be added. This will help avoid vanity listings.
248:
21:
976:
Oh i thought you were just referring to the lonsi leaks section i edited instead of also the hazing incidents. Ill take a look at them as well because i agree the state of frat and sorority articles are abysmal. Would you feel lonsi leaks warrants its own subsection as it is right now? regarding the
867:
A neutral characterization of disputes requires presenting viewpoints with a consistently impartial tone; otherwise, articles end up as partisan commentaries even while presenting all relevant points of view. Even where a topic is presented in terms of facts rather than opinions, inappropriate tones
941:
As for the sections, I suggest to just remove them entirely. First, there's an error in categorization (Rolando Perez was a fatality of a fraternity brawl, not a hazing incident) which would leave just two recorded incidents separated by decades, not enough to warrant a subsection. Second, "assault
856:
issues and resembled an advert/brochure rather than an encyclopedia article. After removing most of the content (i.e., lists of alumni achievements/positions unrelated to actual fraternity activities), the key now is trying to maintain balance with positive/neutral content with the negative. From
929:
Yes you can go ahead and remove those details. As for the rest of it (quotes from university officials, details about which office was involved where), just take it from the point of a reader not from the university: "Do I really care about reading all of this information?" While I do agree it
787:
Taking a cursory look at the editing history of this article, it does seem that there has been a concerted effort from numerous single-purpose accounts (whose editing histories comprise this article, and only this article) to repurpose this article into what's essentially a brochure for the
933:
Also, as this is a point of controversy, let's strive to keep every sentence or claim made here backed up with a few solid references or sources. On the other hand, don't go overboard with it like other editors in the past with an agenda (both negative and positive) who were guilty of
847:: "short paragraphs and single sentences generally do not warrant their own subheading." A simple, chronological recounting of past incidents isn't sufficient content to warrant a subheading and honestly just feels like padding the section to make it bigger, wouldn't you agree?
479:
711:
Add a physical address. Add number of members, both lifetime and active. Add relevant symbolism to the infobox. Expand the
History section. The infobox says there are two chapters... A chapter list should be placed into a table format within the body text, like this:
656:
Most fraternity articles would benefit from additional citations, especially new or updated references. These could be from a notable publication or book, a university yearbook, an official university portal listing or where the school comments on the student
497:
on the
Knowledge. This includes but is not limited to International social societies, local organizations, honor societies, and their members. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the
551:
838:.) Do you have a valid reason for why you think this should be included in such detail to Knowledge, keeping in mind that what may have been a "big deal" within one university is not really as relevant in a wider scope?
181:
791:
I can bite the bullet and take a crack at restoring the
Controversies section with some care and keep a closer watch going forward. Most of the content will still need significant rewriting for NPOV considerations.
366:
1025:
541:
1015:
930:
warrants a mention in the article, it should just stick to the most pertinent facts to be consistent with other fraternity articles. Golden rule of writing is KISS: Keep It Short and Simple.
1030:
882:
If you would like to fix your prior edit or if you want to discuss it further, please go ahead. As mentioned previously in this talk page, this article has a history of being targeted by
946:
503:
1020:
527:
878:
weight on a single controversy from 2018 (relevant to the remaining article content), and that an outside observer would consider it to have been written by an impartial editor?
1005:
415:
389:
356:
175:
670:
499:
489:
460:
31:
1000:
332:
788:
organization. A "controversies" section (which I distinctly remember reading back then) has been scrubbed somehow without triggering any alarms from other editors.
689:(--these things: "| = ''text'' ) is the fraternity-specific infobox. This, and other useful items are linked on the Fraternities and Sororities Project page.
826:, while I am inclined to revert your edits, I would like to first hear your thoughts regarding the following points as you are an editor with experience:
323:
284:
107:
1035:
1010:
949:
since a lot of them are in pretty awful condition and need to be sat down on, so if you want to help out on that as well that would be great. Thanks!
72:
769:
113:
964:
901:
807:
679:
772:, have been scrubbed from the article. These are issues that are well-sourced and relevant, moreso than what's in most of the article.
765:
764:. (But I do think it's established enough to merit its own article.) Two, and more direly, all mentions of controversy, including
883:
218:
196:
127:
58:
163:
720:(to reference two unrelated examples). A chapter list should include dates of chartering. Indicate if a chapter is active by
132:
48:
102:
886:
that have added promotional text and removed controversial content. Let's not give them any further reason to come back.
639:
259:
494:
93:
213:
157:
27:
227:
961:
898:
804:
650:
830:
Your addition of "Examples of
Messages" adds excessively lurid details unfit for an encyclopedia article (see
299:
278:
247:
153:
831:
137:
835:
777:
977:
hazings tho what do you think of combining them into a subsection purely about incidents of that nature?
203:
694:
265:
935:
581:
420:
394:
20:
982:
951:
920:
912:
888:
858:
794:
761:
189:
83:
331:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
315:
232:
98:
169:
773:
662:
585:
79:
52:
705:
229:
875:
844:
717:
713:
978:
916:
853:
823:
757:
626:
533:
994:
685:
The infobox is incomplete. The template best used for this entry, where you can see
478:
454:
328:
408:
383:
751:
305:
945:
I'll leave you to it on how to best sort it out. I plan on going through the
231:
986:
968:
924:
905:
811:
781:
748:
There are massive problems with this article. One, I completely agree with
868:
can be introduced through how facts are selected, presented, or organized.
700:
Set a calendar reminder check the article for necessary updates, annually.
327:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the
645:
An additional, freely-licensed graphic would add reader interest.
567:
536:
in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
532:
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the
241:
233:
43:
15:
493:, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to
502:, where you can join the project, and/or contribute to the
609:
603:
597:
591:
947:
188:
1026:
430:
Knowledge:WikiProject
University of the Philippines
433:Template:WikiProject University of the Philippines
1016:C-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
512:Knowledge:WikiProject Fraternities and Sororities
1031:WikiProject Fraternities and Sororities articles
515:Template:WikiProject Fraternities and Sororities
418:, a project which is currently considered to be
61:for general discussion of the article's subject.
864:
756:it reads like an advert in clear violation of
202:
8:
1021:C-Class Fraternities and Sororities articles
668:Examples and templates are available on the
818:Excessive detail on "Controversies" section
245:
1006:Low-importance Philippine-related articles
634:Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
449:
378:
341:Knowledge:WikiProject Tambayan Philippines
273:
416:WikiProject University of the Philippines
344:Template:WikiProject Tambayan Philippines
874:Do you believe your edits did not place
1001:Start-Class Philippine-related articles
490:Fraternities and Sororities WikiProject
451:
380:
275:
436:University of the Philippines articles
852:Last month, this article had serious
7:
518:Fraternities and Sororities articles
414:This article is within the scope of
321:This article is within the scope of
671:Fraternities and Sororities Project
264:It is of interest to the following
51:for discussing improvements to the
724:its name, or if inactive by using
534:project-independent quality rating
14:
30:on 30 August 2016. The result of
1036:Knowledge pages with to-do lists
1011:WikiProject Philippines articles
625:
575:
477:
453:
407:
382:
324:WikiProject Tambayan Philippines
308:
298:
277:
246:
73:Click here to start a new topic.
19:
546:This article has been rated as
361:This article has been rated as
26:This article was nominated for
1:
427:University of the Philippines
390:University of the Philippines
335:and see a list of open tasks.
70:Put new text under old text.
987:05:52, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
969:04:28, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
925:01:58, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
906:18:31, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
812:10:04, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
782:05:13, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
509:Fraternities and Sororities
461:Fraternities and Sororities
347:Philippine-related articles
78:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
1052:
552:project's importance scale
545:
531:
472:
402:
360:
293:
272:
108:Be welcoming to newcomers
938:and notability-bombing.
884:single purpose accounts
871:
254:This article is rated
103:avoid personal attacks
128:Neutral point of view
687:all available fields
338:Tambayan Philippines
285:Tambayan Philippines
133:No original research
744:Self-promotion, etc
615:Updated 2021-01-20
316:Philippines portal
260:content assessment
114:dispute resolution
75:
741:
740:
735:
734:
586:Upsilon Sigma Phi
566:
565:
562:
561:
558:
557:
485:Upsilon Sigma Phi
448:
447:
444:
443:
377:
376:
373:
372:
240:
239:
94:Assume good faith
71:
53:Upsilon Sigma Phi
42:
41:
1043:
967:
958:
904:
895:
832:WP:NOTEVERYTHING
810:
801:
755:
640:Article requests
629:
622:
621:
616:
579:
578:
568:
520:
519:
516:
513:
510:
481:
474:
473:
468:
465:
457:
450:
438:
437:
434:
431:
428:
411:
404:
403:
398:
386:
379:
367:importance scale
349:
348:
345:
342:
339:
318:
313:
312:
311:
302:
295:
294:
289:
281:
274:
257:
251:
250:
242:
234:
207:
206:
192:
123:Article policies
44:
23:
16:
1051:
1050:
1046:
1045:
1044:
1042:
1041:
1040:
991:
990:
952:
950:
889:
887:
845:MOS:OVERSECTION
836:WP:EXCESSDETAIL
820:
795:
793:
749:
746:
737:
736:
731:
718:Sigma Delta Rho
714:Omega Tau Sigma
590:
576:
517:
514:
511:
508:
507:
487:is part of the
466:
463:
435:
432:
429:
426:
425:
392:
346:
343:
340:
337:
336:
314:
309:
307:
287:
258:on Knowledge's
255:
236:
235:
230:
149:
144:
143:
142:
119:
89:
12:
11:
5:
1049:
1047:
1039:
1038:
1033:
1028:
1023:
1018:
1013:
1008:
1003:
993:
992:
974:
973:
972:
971:
955:PritongKandule
943:
939:
931:
913:PritongKandule
892:PritongKandule
880:
879:
863:
862:
849:
848:
840:
839:
819:
816:
815:
814:
798:PritongKandule
789:
745:
742:
739:
738:
733:
732:
730:
729:
701:
690:
675:
658:
651:Citing sources
646:
633:
631:
630:
618:
573:
571:
564:
563:
560:
559:
556:
555:
548:Low-importance
544:
538:
537:
530:
524:
523:
521:
482:
470:
469:
467:Low‑importance
458:
446:
445:
442:
441:
439:
412:
400:
399:
387:
375:
374:
371:
370:
363:Low-importance
359:
353:
352:
350:
333:the discussion
320:
319:
303:
291:
290:
288:Low‑importance
282:
270:
269:
263:
252:
238:
237:
228:
226:
225:
222:
221:
209:
208:
146:
145:
141:
140:
135:
130:
121:
120:
118:
117:
110:
105:
96:
90:
88:
87:
76:
67:
66:
63:
62:
56:
40:
39:
32:the discussion
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1048:
1037:
1034:
1032:
1029:
1027:
1024:
1022:
1019:
1017:
1014:
1012:
1009:
1007:
1004:
1002:
999:
998:
996:
989:
988:
984:
980:
970:
966:
963:
959:
957:
956:
948:
944:
940:
937:
936:WP:OVERCITING
932:
928:
927:
926:
922:
918:
914:
910:
909:
908:
907:
903:
900:
896:
894:
893:
885:
877:
873:
872:
870:
869:
860:
855:
851:
850:
846:
842:
841:
837:
833:
829:
828:
827:
825:
817:
813:
809:
806:
802:
800:
799:
790:
786:
785:
784:
783:
779:
775:
771:
770:"Lonsi Leaks"
767:
763:
759:
753:
743:
727:
723:
719:
715:
710:
708:
707:
702:
699:
697:
696:
691:
688:
684:
682:
681:
676:
673:
672:
667:
665:
664:
659:
657:organization.
655:
653:
652:
647:
644:
642:
641:
636:
635:
632:
628:
624:
623:
620:
617:
614:
611:
608:
605:
602:
599:
596:
593:
589:
587:
583:
572:
570:
569:
553:
549:
543:
540:
539:
535:
529:
526:
525:
522:
505:
501:
496:
492:
491:
486:
483:
480:
476:
475:
471:
462:
459:
456:
452:
440:
423:
422:
417:
413:
410:
406:
405:
401:
396:
391:
388:
385:
381:
368:
364:
358:
355:
354:
351:
334:
330:
326:
325:
317:
306:
304:
301:
297:
296:
292:
286:
283:
280:
276:
271:
267:
261:
253:
249:
244:
243:
224:
223:
220:
217:
215:
211:
210:
205:
201:
198:
195:
191:
187:
183:
180:
177:
174:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
155:
152:
151:Find sources:
148:
147:
139:
138:Verifiability
136:
134:
131:
129:
126:
125:
124:
115:
111:
109:
106:
104:
100:
97:
95:
92:
91:
85:
81:
80:Learn to edit
77:
74:
69:
68:
65:
64:
60:
54:
50:
46:
45:
37:
33:
29:
25:
22:
18:
17:
975:
954:
953:
891:
890:
881:
866:
865:
859:WP:IMPARTIAL
821:
797:
796:
774:Nintendo2000
762:WP:PROMOTION
747:
725:
721:
704:
703:
693:
692:
686:
678:
677:
669:
661:
660:
649:
648:
638:
637:
619:
612:
606:
600:
594:
580:
574:
547:
500:project page
488:
484:
419:
362:
322:
266:WikiProjects
212:
199:
193:
185:
178:
172:
166:
160:
150:
122:
47:This is the
35:
329:Philippines
256:Start-class
176:free images
59:not a forum
36:speedy keep
995:Categories
582:To-do list
504:discussion
495:Greek Life
979:Firekiino
917:Firekiino
824:Firekiino
116:if needed
99:Be polite
49:talk page
876:WP:UNDUE
768:and the
695:Maintain
421:inactive
395:inactive
214:Archives
84:get help
57:This is
55:article.
28:deletion
911:Hello @
854:WP:NPOV
758:WP:NPOV
726:italics
722:bolding
680:Infobox
663:Cleanup
610:refresh
598:history
550:on the
464:C‑class
365:on the
182:WP refs
170:scholar
766:hazing
706:Wikify
262:scale.
154:Google
752:Chlod
674:page.
604:watch
197:JSTOR
158:books
112:Seek
983:talk
921:talk
843:Per
834:and
822:To @
778:talk
760:and
592:edit
584:for
190:FENS
164:news
101:and
34:was
716:or
542:Low
357:Low
204:TWL
997::
985:)
965:📝
962:✉️
923:)
902:📝
899:✉️
808:📝
805:✉️
780:)
184:)
82:;
981:(
960:-
919:(
897:-
861::
803:-
776:(
754::
750:@
709::
698::
683::
666::
654::
643::
613:·
607:·
601:·
595:·
588::
554:.
528:C
506:.
424:.
397:)
393:(
369:.
268::
219:1
216::
200:·
194:·
186:·
179:·
173:·
167:·
161:·
156:(
86:.
38:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
