Talk:Yadava - Knowledge

1877:

Shakti Sangam Tantra that the descendants of King Ahuk are called Ahir (Gwala). It is also mentioned in Harivans and Bhagavata Purana. Ahir is not a caste but a title given to Maharaj Yadu. Then it is said that they robbed women of Vrishni and Andhak dynasty. Why would anyone rob women of their own lineage? Why would the cowherds rob their own women? Clearly, it has been sabotaged in modern India. Made to discredit. If it is assumed that they looted. Arjun used the word 'Loota'. This should also be true, he protected women from Arjuna. When Arjuna was kidnapping and taking Subhadra, all the Yadavas wanted to kill Arjuna including Balarama but he could not do so because of Lord Krishna. This must have been the reason that when Arjuna was taking the women, he thought that he was kidnapping and taking them and he attacked Arjuna and protected the women. Arjuna lost to them, so must have used the word loot. One more thing, when Arjuna defeated the Narayani army in battle, he was proud that he defeated with his power. Lord Krishna promised Indra that he will protect Arjuna as long as he stays on earth. That is why Lord Krishna did this to break Arjuna's pride. It is all written. Now the question comes that the condition you have spoken to see us. According to the condition that any scholar or source of high news which according to Knowledge, his article can be taken as reliable source of Knowledge article. He never wrote that Ahir robbed the woman. So why is it written in some Knowledge articles that Ahir looted? Two sources are telling about A and B, so shall we use them to indicate C? Thank You

2063:

according to modern criteria, the entire particular caste cannot be placed in the class decided in modern times. According to this criteria, they try to prove that you are modern, no relation to the ancient. You take Tulsi Ji's Ramcharitmanas, he says in one place that in the whole world, apart from Ahir, there is no pure clean heart of anyone, then he tells Villain in one place. There has been a lot of sabotage in middle and modern history. Thank you very much sir for answering our questions.

1410:

the whole point of this discussion. If you feel we dont have to merge it then dont merge it. but core issue is "why is work of so many reputed scholars ignored". kindly look into it. Just a few sentence correction based on MSA Rao book is being expected. The article YADAV is not really neutral. So many books have been provided as reference which mentions about AHIR kings ,,, AHIR and YADAV being synonyms. MSA Rao should be given due weightage ( you had mentioned that ).

334: 2229: 358: 256: 222: 242: 191: 266: 2354: 2286: 1444:. Forum shopping when you do not "get your way" in one place is not usually a good idea. You appear now not to have a particular opinion one way or the other about the actual merger proposal, despite being the proposer. This is therefore a waste of everyone's time and I wonder if it would be best for you to formally withdraw the proposal. - 471:"यादव" is pronuonced as Yadav, not Yadava unlike Sanskrit and whenever any work in English mentioned about the ancient Indian people, it always used Yadava, not Yadav. Even J. N. Singh Yadav's work is titled "Yādavas Through The Ages", not Yadavs. At the end, the point raised by you seems to be an irrelevant one to me. Thank you again. 1676:

It is plan simple fact that Yadava/Yadav no difference as no difference in krishn/krishna or Ram/Rama. It means there is no discussion needed at all. As far as yadav and ahir is concerned it has been used interchangeably. For the mater of fact, when krishna killed Kaliyanag (one demon shape snake) by

1590:

what do you mean by outofcontext. MSA Rao clearly states that Ahir/yadav/yadava are one and the same. He has mentioned clearly that evidence exists that yadava dynasties are Ahir dynasties. The article needs to be merged. Whats going on. Ahir, yadav and yadava are always used interchangeably. merge

1002:

Both Yadav and Yadava should be combined, but Ahir should be separate. Yadavs did not exist in the Gangetic Plain before 1900. The term was adopted by the some among the former Ahir, Gwalas, and Gopis (herders and milkmen) as a part of a program of upward social mobility. Subsequently a golden age

2028:

It may be from scholars but we're showing very old primary texts and very old scholars. Academic thoughts tend to change over time, sometimes because certain things become more popular areas of study but often because the criteria used for study has tightened up. As an exmaple, this is why we do not

1944:

Sir, By writing Rama in English to Lord Rama of Hindi, Lord Rama of Hindi language and English language does not separate, he is the same. Similarly, by writing Yadav or Yadva, both will not be separated. Sir I agree that this is about the ancient Yadavas, not about modern Yadavas. but instead you

527:

In accordance with the long standing colonial tradition of denigrating Hindu deities, ignoring glaring evidence, about how Krishna was a 'tribal' deity, later appropriated by Brahmins to preserve their ever weakening authority. These colonial masters has not only distorted our history to suit their

1876:

Sir, I would like to make some argument. In the Padma, Vishnu Purana, Lord Vishnu himself has said that he will be born in the Yadava dynasty of Gwalas and will kill the wicked. Even in the Rig Veda, Maharaj Yadu and his brother Turvasu were called Gwala as a servant of cows. It is mentioned in the

1728:

His entourage was attacked by bandits. And why exactly are these bandits equated with Abhirs? Now all along the author seems to be arguing that the Abhirs were Vrishnis, then why would Vrishnis attack their own women? As usual the reader is given no proof in this regard, except for a statement from

579:

As far as I know, there is absolutely no evidence in any ancient Indian literature that ancient Yadava people were anyway related to the Abhiras. Even the reference mentioned by you is about the castes of Bombay, not about the ancient people. It is quite true that like a number of other communities

462:

page. Even at the end of the lead paragraph, it is clearly mentioned, "A number of communities and royal dynasties of ancient, medieval and modern Indian subcontinent, claiming their descents from the ancient Yadava clans and mythical Yadava personalities also describe themselves as the Yadavas (or

407:

word and In Sanskrit (written in any script, including Devanagari), if a lone consonant is written without any following vowel, it is given a halanta/virāma diacritic below (example: प्). If it not there, it is to pronounced with vowel "a" after it. The citations mentioned in this article also used

388:

Sorry Abhiras are not Yadavas in the Mahabharata. THey are described as the tribe that kidnapped the Vrishni and Andhaka women and looted the remnants of the Yadavas after their internecine strife that wiped out all their warriors during their journey to Indraprastha. If Abhiras were really Yadavas

1749:

In accordance with the long standing colonial tradition of denigrating Hindu deities, Scroll's recent article on Krishna indulges in wild speculation, ignoring glaring evidence, about how Krishna was a 'tribal' deity, later appropriated by Brahmins to preserve their ever weakening authority. These

1409:

I think SITUSH the point here is article YADAV needs some correction based on Temples of Kr̥ṣṇa in South India: history, art, and traditions in Tamilnāḍu " is written by T. Padmaja Social movements and social transformation: a study of two backward classes movements in India by MSA RAO. That is

2082:

No problem. Let's see if Utcursch has anything to say. It would help if you could try to indent your replies using ":" in future - if you look at this section when you next edit it, you will see above how I have added a series of ":" before each message, one more ":" for each than existed for the

1680:

In particular in north side (in particular in Bihar and UP) there is four sub caste(called as kories) of Yadav are krishnauth, Majroth,Goriya, gawala.As all most some other caste caste have their own sub caste(kories) like in Brahmins but at least there is no debate on their being on brahmins.In

1367:

So UTCURSCH is basically saying that AHIR are the not the only YADAVS but other communties fall under YADAVS too but then why is that the article YADAV only mentions about AHIR. It should also mention about various other communities under YADAV. Bases on UTCURSCH comments the article YADAV needs

508:

Drona). In Mahabharata war only blood related people are seen to fight and kill each other. Then how can one say that Abhiras are not part of Yadavas just for the reason that they attacked andhakas/Vrishnis. That too the episode is part of so called Musala Parv where All Yadavas are seen to fight

431:

I am surprised. Joy is giving such lame excuses for maintaining this article. I won't discuss with you whether it is Yadav or yadava, in sanskrit, because AFAIK, it is same. In english both terms are used interchangeably, and you are just creating problem for readers who are yet not familiar with

506:

Just to answer the leading sentence of this discussion about Mahabharata that why did Abhira tribe kidnap or loot the Vrishni and Andhaka. As far as I or anyone else can easily understand that Mahabharata is the story of bloody fight between brothers and relatives. Brother killed brother (Arjuna

2062:

Here the source of the same scholars are being shown who have mostly worked on economic and educational parameters or researched on a particular subject, it is also true that economic criteria and occupation determine the class of any one, but the ancient caste category cannot be changed, and

1271:

fit into this proposal? Some of the above comments seem actually to be using alleged Abhira/Ahir synonymity as at least a partial basis for their position. If there is any doubt then the articles should not be merged: better not to conflate and thereby create potential misinformation. -

610: 910:

for it. While there are quite a few editors supporting a merge after the proposal was withdrawn, many of those arguments do not have reference to the sources presented indicating that there is not substantial enough overlap between the topics to warrant a merge in accordance with

667:

In which place or book it is written that Ahir was not Yadav. Do not write history by yourself. The Yadavas are a dynasty consisting mainly of four groups. You will find evidence in the Puranas - Vishnu, Harivamsa, Padma Purana, Shakti Sangam Tantra etc. Thank you

1769:

Dear administrator, the central description of article "ancient Indian Kshatriya" should be changed to ancient hindu tribes. As their ancestral king was cursed by his father that he will no longer carry the family lineage/kingdom.So, they are just a Indian tribes.

1300:(with sources). TLDR: (1) A number of castes claiming descent from the ancient Yadavas started doing so in the 1920s. (2) While Ahirs themselves believe that Ahir = Yadav, there are other communities which claim that Ahirs are just one of the several Yadav castes. 1345:

arguments that the British lumped various groups together at Ahir etc in their censuses are somewhat poor as a basis for conflating the groups noted here: the British methods were generally skewed and this has been commented on by countless modern writers, eg in

1898:

It is your interpretation of the primary sources that leads you down a path of uncertainty and confusion. Those ancient texts were compiled over centuries, exist in many forms and were influenced by the needs of the time (an old but more recent example would be

445:

Thanks for your reply. What I could understand from your reply that the only reason behind your proposal for deletion of this article is the possible confusion between Yadava and Yadav by the readers, But, a reference has been made at the top of this article to

1347: 588:

and not supported by facts. If you find any reference in any ancient Indian literature (Hindu, Buddhist or Jain or any secular text), where Abhiras are mentioned as a Yadava clan, you are welcome to incorporate the same in the article with proper citation.

1241:

I have indented some of the comments above as things were getting confusing. I would encourage the IPs to register: merge discussions involving IPs tend to hit problems regarding judgement of consensus. I am not suggesting that any of the above IPs are

389:

why would they prey on their own kinsmen. I have tagged prod. Kindly either redirect to yadav or move the material there. Yadav(cast), would be offshooted to a proper namespace. You should have readers in your mind before creating such an article.

611:

http://books.google.co.in/books?id=Ri7pgHOQC8UC&pg=PA21&dq=ahirs+of+gujarat&hl=en&ei=rS2MTbuHHsf4rQfOx-XSDQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CDIQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=ahirs%20of%20gujarat&f=false

1903:, who inevitably had to write to please his royal masters). This is why we should always use modern academic interpretations. We are also not permitted on Knowledge to make our own judgements regarding which version is "right" - that is what 2195: 2029:

use Raj era sources in caste articles - they're hopelessly "amateur" compared to modern sources. (And as an example of the problem relating to primary texts being used by us, consider the northern and southern recensions of the

776:

This is what i copied from main article. If i am not wrong then this means Yadavas and Yadavs are same thing. Yadav article says yadavs are shudras then how come these glorified people who were once kings and rulers became

1677:

naked feet that time this term coined ahir(ahi+ir i.e. "ahi" means snake and "ir" means stamping by naked feet i.e. fearless ) for yadavs.Hence, there is no need to divide the yadav page and making it ambiguous.

791:

There is no question of yadav being Sudra.If you take four varna ( bhramin, kshatriya, vaishav, shurda)in hindu.Rather Yadav are always been in Kshatriya.It is showing the complete lack of Indian caste system.

1555:. You've been quoting the sentence "evidence exists for equating the Ahirs with the Yadavs" out-of-context to prove your point. The book clearly states "Yadav is a category of allied castes", and lists Ahir as 153: 580:

in South Asia, the Abhiras or the Ahirs also claim themselves as Yadavas or Yadavs and that very fact is mentioned in the lead paragraph. Knowledge being an encyclopedia, which follows the policy of

1144: 955: 948:

Based on these sources given below the term Yadav, Ahir and Yadava are used synonymously so it is proposed that they be merged into one article YADAVA. All contents of Ahir and Yadav will move to

1003:

was invented in which they, a non-elite caste, had now magically become kshatriya. The Yadav page needs to explicitly state that and all its history should be post-1900. Here are some sources:

554: 2479: 1750:

colonial masters has not only distorted our history to suit their purpose but also made their slaves psychologically And they knew creating conflicting statement would result in disharmony

859:

Shudra is occupation based classification called Varna and is determined by traditional occupation of the community.S ince we 'yadavs were nomadic cowherders,so they come in shudra Varna.

2083:

previous message. Indenting can get quite complex but just doing that is a good start. (So, if you reply to this one, which already has one ":", you would start your reply with "::".) -

2202: 1815:

Why is this article using very old translations of primary sources? It shouldn't be using any - we should be working off reliable, modern secondary sources. I am inclined to gut it. -

547:

please remove non elite word from yadav articles because who is elite or non elite is not decided by you. Those people who proud of his work is always elite. So please sir remove it.

1830:

Only primary and old sources are true. Modern sources which are being written today are not considered to be true. They are with hostility. Both old and new sources should be used.

1796:

Neither someone's status is removed nor decreased , your mindset should be changed, Knowledge is responsible for giving for giving appropriate information,and that it is doing.

1368:

correction. Also MSA Rao is a source which cannot be ignored. The article YADAV needs correction based on MSA RAos book. In academic world he is a premier historian/scholar.

509:

each other and kill each other. So at least in case of Mahabharata it is simply baseless to say that Abhira are not Yadava because they attacked Andhaka/Vrishni (the Yadava).--

2164:

The sources provided for the ancient Yadavas belonging to Abhira tribe and thus present-day Ahir caste are not reliable in this article. Would request you to look into this.

753:

Many kings started there own Dynasties like Vrishni, Bhoja etc. and there descendants are using there name instead of calling themselves Yadu vanshi (descendants of Yadu). --

1160:

This book was printed in 1880 by government central by the goverment. The book mentions about a chief Asa the ahir also known as yadav. This is before the 19th century.

966: 573: 2464: 2474: 348: 1464:

Thanks everyone for the comments. I formally remove my proposal to merge the articles ahir/yadav/yadava. Sitush can you help me out with the formalities. Thanks

1145:

http://books.google.com/books?ei=4RqGTvHVDYPOrQf59-TrDA&ct=result&id=wWEiAQAAMAAJ&dq=semi+historical+evidences+ahir&q=semi+historical#search_anchor

956:

http://books.google.com/books?ei=4RqGTvHVDYPOrQf59-TrDA&ct=result&id=wWEiAQAAMAAJ&dq=semi+historical+evidences+ahir&q=semi+historical#search_anchor

628: 1202: 147: 2484: 1133:

Two reliable academic sources one by MSA Rao and other by T Padmaja is provided above which clearly mentions Ahir as Yadavs long before 18 or 19th century.

412:

word and it can not be used to describe the ancient Yadavas. Please first discuss in the talk page why a Sanskrit word should be replaced by a Hindi word.

79: 408:

Yadava, not Yadav. Not a single logic is provided why the article should be either deleted or shifted to Yadav. It is simply unacceptable as Yadav is a

1082:

There are a bunch of pages in Jaffrelot that address this, but I'm too tired to quote them (and it would likely be a copyright infringement if I do).

1047:

kshatriyas, had long sought and attained (after 1898) recruitment as soldiers in the British Indian army, particularly in the Western Gangetic Plain."

2469: 432:

what the term is and likely to be confused between yadav and yadava. Also. whether in sanskrit or in Hindi it is always written without halanta.

2033:- which do we choose? why are they different? and so on)I don't do a lot of work on ancient empires/dynasties etc here on Knowledge but I think 1630:

By reading the discussion from users. It is clear that yadav and yadava there is no difference. numerous proofs/source in discussion of Yadav.

1573: 2459: 1972:

Absolutely you said right, if there will be different opinions, then you will show but it does not happen. The 'selective option' is adopted.

468: 324: 314: 1713: 1061: 1017: 85: 2072:

That is why I said that very ancient and modern sources (present ) whose original research is based on very ancient history should be used.

1649: 778: 651: 343: 232: 2489: 1471: 1417: 987: 967:

http://books.google.com/books?id=F-_eR1isesMC&pg=RA1-PA34&dq=Yadavas+of+South+India+velir&hl=en#v=onepage&q&f=false

574:

http://books.google.co.in/books?ei=xm2ATbagEYPirAf-8szDBw&ct=result&id=fltuAAAAMAAJ&dq=chudasama+were+abhiras&q=yadavas

2308: 1533: 1512: 1375: 1211: 1176: 1111: 624: 558: 2388: 1787:

Removing someone from the state does not change anyone's character. Whether a lion lives in a forest or in a city, it is a lion.

521:

All these confusion is caused by the British written books, who didn’t have the slightest knowledge about our culture and history

2454: 99: 30: 1203:

http://books.google.com/books?id=nqvloPNdEZgC&pg=PA44&dq=ahir+YADAV&hl=en#v=onepage&q=ahir%20YADAV&f=false

808: 104: 44: 20: 528:

purpose but also made their slaves psychologically And they knew creating conflicting statement would result in disharmony

1697:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

1607: 620: 74: 2210: 202: 1246:

but such activity is quite common on Indian caste articles & it does tend to make life difficult for all concerned.

1136:

Rao has also stated that ancient Yadav dynasty and Ahir are one and the same. MSA Rao book must be given due weightage.

735:

So why indian govt and constitution accepts all ahirs be it be yaduvanshi , nandvanshi or gwalvanshi to be yadavas ?.

289: 279: 227: 65: 168: 1104:

msa raos book can be taken as a good source and ahir, yadav and yadava can be combined. please read msa raos book.

2102: 2073: 2064: 2000: 1973: 1946: 1878: 1831: 1788: 1088: 1079:: North Indian caste title signifying kinship with the Hindu pastoral hero Krishna; now used in preference to Ahir. 851: 669: 135: 1801: 1775: 1717: 864: 838: 824: 2177: 1999:

Sir, what I have argued is not primarily mine based on the original article, it is from the scholars.Thank you

1645: 782: 655: 2259:

It is factually wrong. No historical inscription/ book/ record says any connection between Chedis and Ghosis.

2407:

article will only add confusion. But perhaps I've misunderstood, in which case I guess the new page is fine.

2191:

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

1755: 1734: 533: 2427: 2396: 2392: 2384: 2235: 2206: 1475: 1421: 991: 960:

Social movements and social transformation: a study of two backward classes movements in India by MSA RAO.

109: 1633:

Merge the articles YADAV/AHIR/YADAVA. how many articles for the same thing. now its all becoming a joke.

484:

The same author dr Jn singh yadav a famous yadav historian says yadavs is same as yadav so why new article?

2304: 2273: 2159: 1797: 1784: 1771: 1537: 1516: 1379: 1215: 1180: 1115: 860: 847: 834: 820: 459: 451: 447: 2173: 606:

abhira has yaduvanshi classification link-The Tribes and Castes of the Central Provinces of India-page-22

2435: 2412: 2365: 1751: 1730: 963:

Temples of Kr̥ṣṇa in South India: history, art, and traditions in Tamilnāḍu " is written by T. Padmaja

920: 833:

Shudras also have their chiefs/kings.for example adivasis were also having their kings#rani durgawati.

529: 513: 208: 129: 2341: 2269: 1487: 1326: 1083: 1709: 1637: 1595: 1529: 1508: 1467: 1413: 1371: 1207: 1172: 1107: 983: 796: 616: 550: 438: 395: 754: 721: 190: 1641: 800: 758: 739: 738:

Then why are ahirs called yadavs and why not bhati, jadeja and saini ever used Yadav as last name ?

725: 683: 643: 485: 454:

page very clearly has removed all possibilities of confusion. A similar reference is also there in

161: 125: 55: 2337: 2139: 1564: 1305: 804: 743: 687: 647: 489: 70: 463:

Yadavs)," which I think leaves no room for confusion. A small point I like to mention again. In

2293: 1848: 1603: 1058: 1014: 584:, I think you will appreciate that if Abhira and Yadava become a single article, it will be a 404: 175: 51: 2430:

as a DAB page. Apparently, a sock editor has been attempting to create a content fork there.

1052: 2431: 2408: 2361: 2088: 2042: 1916: 1856: 1844: 1820: 1581: 1495: 1449: 1399: 1355: 1277: 1008: 949: 916: 635: 510: 773:

Yadava personalities also describe themselves as the Yadavas (or later Yadavs or Jadhavs).

333: 1548: 1243: 912: 433: 390: 2265:

Infact Ghosis have started connecting themselves with Krishna only in the 30th century.

2118:

I am not sure which specific sources are being referred to, but if we're talking about

1904: 464: 409: 2399:, and then reverted.) My understanding is that the term is another way of expressing " 2448: 2187:

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

2135: 2034: 1560: 1322: 1301: 141: 2387:

to a stub article from the existing disambiguation page. (Also was previously done

2167: 2127: 2101:

I will take care of this from the beginning whenever there is a discussion. Thanks

1908: 1599: 1163:

People of India: Rajasthan, Part 1 By K. S. Singh published by government of India

664: 593: 507:

killed Karna or Arjuna killed Duryodhana), A pupil kills his teacher (Arjuna -: -->

472: 416: 271: 1054:

Caste, Society and Politics in India from the Eighteenth Century to the Modern Age

1432:

This discussion is about the merger proposal, not about possible improvements to

2256:

In the Chedi section - It is mentioned that Chedis are present day Hindu Ghosi.

2196:

Vasudeva tells Arjuna about the destruction of Yadavas and Krishna's message.jpg

2084: 2038: 1941: 1912: 1873: 1852: 1816: 1577: 1491: 1445: 1395: 1351: 1273: 1911:

saying different things then we should show all of those different opinions. -

2423: 2380: 1552: 1526:

MSA Raos book can definitely be used as a source to merge AHIR/YADAV/YADAVA.

1441: 261: 2131: 819:

Yadavs are group of peasant- pastrol communities so they comes in shudras.

639: 2153:

Sources provided for them being belonging to Abhira tribe, thus Ahir caste.

634:

If you have any doubt that abhiras later called ahirs have a branch called

357: 255: 221: 1900: 1394:

does mention Rao and does mention communities other than the Ahirs. -

2400: 1268: 943: 883: 717: 705: 701: 24: 1843:

That is not how it works. In fact, it is exactly the opposite - see

1342:, clearly demonstrate that they have considered the opinions of Rao. 287:-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the 2037:

does a fair bit so perhaps they will have something to say here. -

241: 1433: 1391: 1339: 1332: 935: 875: 713: 709: 697: 473: 455: 417: 284: 1945:

should use Yaduvansh as the main title and not Yadava. Thank You

1572:

A general notice: I have referred this discussion for review at

939: 879: 581: 1505:

many many sources use ahir,yadav and yadava interchangeingly.

2223: 585: 184: 15: 2220:

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 24 December 2023

2130:

for this article. Relevant quotes from these texts belong on

1490:(who supported your proposal) and no other person objects. - 650:) 15:38, 7 July 2011 (UTC) "Is there any answer to Raosaab7 " 2439: 2416: 2369: 2345: 2312: 2277: 2214: 2181: 2142: 2105: 2092: 2076: 2067: 2046: 2003: 1976: 1949: 1920: 1881: 1860: 1834: 1824: 1805: 1791: 1779: 1759: 1738: 1721: 1653: 1611: 1585: 1567: 1541: 1520: 1499: 1479: 1453: 1425: 1403: 1383: 1359: 1308: 1281: 1219: 1184: 1119: 1093: 1043:, who would by early 1900s begin referring to themselves as 995: 924: 868: 854: 842: 828: 812: 786: 762: 747: 729: 691: 672: 659: 600: 562: 537: 516: 493: 479: 440: 423: 397: 356: 332: 704:(descendants of Yadu). These clans are also descendants of 2319:

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 26 March 2024

1297: 1154:

and then "Gazetteer of the Bombay Presidency: Khándesh"

906:

The proposal has been withdrawn and there is otherwise

2323:

Can anyone change (literally, descended from Yadu) to

978: 160: 1338:

sources such as Jaffrelot, which are already used in

2126:, I agree with Sitush's assessment -- these are not 975: 972: 899:

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

642:

a clan of rajputs were caled abhiras and ahir ranas.

1681:

summary,What I mean these pages needs to be merged.

2268:Remove the mention of Ghosis from Chedis section. 1706:Is their any relation to Yadava and Kapu caste ? 2480:B-Class Indian history articles of Low-importance 1576:, bearing in mind the formal withdrawal above. - 1551:has made available pages from the MS Rao book at 1296:I oppose the merge because of the reasons listed 1166:It states Ahir and yadav are used interchangeably 569:Abhiras themselves are Yadavas so why new article 2262:So remove the last two lines from this section. 1702:Is their any relation to Yadava and Kapu caste ? 283:, which aims to improve Knowledge's coverage of 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 2201:Participate in the deletion discussion at the 1486:That can be done, if we get the agreement of 1436:, which is an aspect that has been discussed 902:A summary of the conclusions reached follows. 174: 8: 678:Yadava and Yadav article creating confusion? 2324: 1157:Page 578 yadav or ahir is used synonymously 1707: 1169:Please consider these for article merger 548: 216: 1013:. University of California Press. p. 90. 2465:B-Class India articles of Low-importance 2403:". If that's correct, having a separate 1765:Editing of article central description. 218: 188: 2475:Low-importance Indian history articles 1390:Are we reading the same article here? 1321:support the "oppose" reasons given by 1057:. Cambridge University Press. p. 387. 682:If it is yadavas then what is Yadavs ? 555:2409:4064:b03:ea9d:1f6c:9a28:5aae:3291 469:Schwa deletion in Indo-Aryan languages 1745:No evidence as to abhirs looted women 7: 893:The following discussion is closed. 277:This article is within the scope of 2485:WikiProject Indian history articles 1010:Peasants and monks in British India 207:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 1335:explains the creation of a history 458:article, directing the readers to 365:This article was last assessed in 14: 2352: 2284: 2227: 2172:Can you please look into this? 1693:The discussion above is closed. 264: 254: 240: 220: 189: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 2470:B-Class Indian history articles 1907:is for, and if we have various 850:Where is Yadav Shudra written? 319:This article has been rated as 1460:formally withdraw the proposal 979:http://en.wikipedia.org/Yadava 1: 2460:Low-importance India articles 2313:12:09, 24 December 2023 (UTC) 2278:06:15, 24 December 2023 (UTC) 1722:19:58, 23 February 2019 (UTC) 976:http://en.wikipedia.org/Ahirs 973:http://en.wikipedia.org/Yadav 480:05:42, 27 February 2011 (UTC) 441:15:02, 26 February 2011 (UTC) 424:12:47, 26 February 2011 (UTC) 398:10:03, 26 February 2011 (UTC) 341:This article is supported by 42:Put new text under old text. 1654:03:50, 16 October 2011 (UTC) 1612:01:57, 14 October 2011 (UTC) 925:19:45, 19 October 2011 (UTC) 813:06:58, 17 October 2011 (UTC) 631:) 05:33, 12 April 2011 (UTC) 344:the Indian history workgroup 2250:to reactivate your request. 2238:has been answered. Set the 2143:20:00, 11 August 2020 (UTC) 1586:00:48, 9 October 2011 (UTC) 1568:17:03, 8 October 2011 (UTC) 1542:15:30, 8 October 2011 (UTC) 1521:05:16, 6 October 2011 (UTC) 1500:16:26, 5 October 2011 (UTC) 1480:16:22, 5 October 2011 (UTC) 1454:16:06, 5 October 2011 (UTC) 1426:16:00, 5 October 2011 (UTC) 1404:15:13, 5 October 2011 (UTC) 1384:15:07, 5 October 2011 (UTC) 1360:10:13, 5 October 2011 (UTC) 1325:and, where appropriate, by 1309:09:59, 5 October 2011 (UTC) 1282:09:30, 5 October 2011 (UTC) 1220:05:53, 5 October 2011 (UTC) 1185:05:50, 5 October 2011 (UTC) 1120:03:51, 5 October 2011 (UTC) 1094:02:28, 5 October 2011 (UTC) 996:22:41, 4 October 2011 (UTC) 934:Proposal to merge articles 874:Proposal to merge articles 299:Knowledge:WikiProject India 50:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 2506: 2490:WikiProject India articles 2346:16:37, 26 March 2024 (UTC) 1806:08:48, 2 August 2020 (UTC) 1760:16:54, 19 April 2020 (UTC) 1739:22:03, 19 April 2020 (UTC) 1007:Pinch, William R. (1996). 869:08:53, 2 August 2020 (UTC) 601:08:31, 16 March 2011 (UTC) 563:16:01, 21 April 2020 (UTC) 538:21:57, 19 April 2020 (UTC) 325:project's importance scale 302:Template:WikiProject India 2376:Merge new Yaduvanshi page 2215:13:05, 1 March 2023 (UTC) 2182:12:14, 12 June 2022 (UTC) 1553:Talk:Yadav#Pages_from_Rao 364: 340: 318: 249: 215: 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 2440:05:31, 14 May 2024 (UTC) 2417:03:27, 13 May 2024 (UTC) 2370:05:31, 14 May 2024 (UTC) 2106:13:47, 4 July 2020 (UTC) 2093:13:15, 4 July 2020 (UTC) 2077:12:47, 4 July 2020 (UTC) 2068:12:43, 4 July 2020 (UTC) 2047:11:51, 4 July 2020 (UTC) 2004:10:34, 4 July 2020 (UTC) 1977:10:32, 4 July 2020 (UTC) 1950:10:28, 4 July 2020 (UTC) 1921:10:26, 4 July 2020 (UTC) 1882:10:17, 4 July 2020 (UTC) 1861:09:24, 4 July 2020 (UTC) 1835:09:03, 4 July 2020 (UTC) 1825:15:57, 3 July 2020 (UTC) 1792:09:18, 4 July 2020 (UTC) 1780:17:23, 28 May 2020 (UTC) 1695:Please do not modify it. 896:Please do not modify it. 855:09:15, 4 July 2020 (UTC) 843:17:19, 28 May 2020 (UTC) 829:17:16, 28 May 2020 (UTC) 787:07:08, 8 July 2011 (UTC) 763:09:03, 8 July 2011 (UTC) 748:06:48, 8 July 2011 (UTC) 730:01:52, 8 July 2011 (UTC) 692:15:40, 7 July 2011 (UTC) 673:09:09, 4 July 2020 (UTC) 660:07:10, 8 July 2011 (UTC) 621:Ancient indian historian 494:15:43, 7 July 2011 (UTC) 1811:Old and primary sources 517:15:15, 4 May 2016 (UTC) 2455:B-Class India articles 2422:No longer applies, as 460:Yadav (disambiguation) 452:Yadav (disambiguation) 448:Yadav (disambiguation) 361: 337: 197:This article is rated 75:avoid personal attacks 1333:Yadav#Sanskritisation 1051:Bayly, Susan (2001). 360: 336: 100:Neutral point of view 2134:, not on Knowledge. 1785:User:Deokalimuskabad 1331:the sourced section 848:User:Deokalimuskabad 105:No original research 2331:descended from Yadu 769:Yadava are Yadavs ? 2207:Community Tech bot 2160:Packer&Tracker 2128:acceptable sources 1559:of these castes. 971:Impacted articles 362: 338: 203:content assessment 86:dispute resolution 47: 2254: 2253: 1724: 1712:comment added by 1657: 1640:comment added by 1615: 1598:comment added by 1532:comment added by 1511:comment added by 1488:User:64.105.168.2 1470:comment added by 1416:comment added by 1374:comment added by 1327:Fowler&fowler 1210:comment added by 1175:comment added by 1110:comment added by 1085:Fowler&fowler 1063:978-0-521-79842-6 1019:978-0-520-20061-6 986:comment added by 816: 799:comment added by 633: 619:comment added by 565: 553:comment added by 381: 380: 377: 376: 373: 372: 280:WikiProject India 183: 182: 66:Assume good faith 43: 2497: 2360: 2356: 2355: 2335: 2332: 2329: 2326: 2301: 2297: 2292: 2288: 2287: 2245: 2241: 2231: 2230: 2224: 2171: 2163: 1909:reliable sources 1656: 1634: 1614: 1592: 1544: 1523: 1482: 1428: 1386: 1222: 1187: 1122: 1091: 1086: 1074: 1072: 1070: 1030: 1028: 1026: 998: 898: 815: 793: 636:Yaduvanshi Ahirs 632: 613: 598: 477: 436: 421: 393: 307: 306: 303: 300: 297: 274: 269: 268: 267: 258: 251: 250: 245: 244: 243: 238: 235: 224: 217: 200: 194: 193: 185: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 16: 2505: 2504: 2500: 2499: 2498: 2496: 2495: 2494: 2445: 2444: 2378: 2353: 2351: 2333: 2330: 2327: 2321: 2299: 2295: 2285: 2283: 2243: 2239: 2228: 2222: 2203:nomination page 2189: 2165: 2157: 2155: 1813: 1798:Deokalimuskabad 1772:Deokalimuskabad 1767: 1747: 1714:198.147.202.105 1704: 1699: 1698: 1635: 1593: 1527: 1506: 1465: 1462: 1411: 1369: 1205: 1170: 1105: 1089: 1084: 1068: 1066: 1064: 1050: 1024: 1022: 1020: 1006: 981: 932: 894: 887: 861:Deokalimuskabad 835:Deokalimuskabad 821:Deokalimuskabad 794: 771: 680: 614: 594: 571: 545: 434: 391: 386: 304: 301: 298: 295: 294: 270: 265: 263: 239: 236: 230: 201:on Knowledge's 198: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 2503: 2501: 2493: 2492: 2487: 2482: 2477: 2472: 2467: 2462: 2457: 2447: 2446: 2443: 2442: 2385:been converted 2377: 2374: 2373: 2372: 2320: 2317: 2316: 2315: 2252: 2251: 2232: 2221: 2218: 2199: 2198: 2188: 2185: 2174:Iamritwikaryan 2154: 2151: 2150: 2149: 2148: 2147: 2146: 2145: 2120:Ramcharitmanas 2111: 2110: 2109: 2108: 2096: 2095: 2060: 2059: 2058: 2057: 2056: 2055: 2054: 2053: 2052: 2051: 2050: 2049: 2015: 2014: 2013: 2012: 2011: 2010: 2009: 2008: 2007: 2006: 1988: 1987: 1986: 1985: 1984: 1983: 1982: 1981: 1980: 1979: 1961: 1960: 1959: 1958: 1957: 1956: 1955: 1954: 1953: 1952: 1930: 1929: 1928: 1927: 1926: 1925: 1924: 1923: 1889: 1888: 1887: 1886: 1885: 1884: 1866: 1865: 1864: 1863: 1838: 1837: 1812: 1809: 1766: 1763: 1746: 1743: 1742: 1741: 1703: 1700: 1692: 1691: 1690: 1689: 1688: 1687: 1686: 1685: 1684: 1683: 1682: 1678: 1665: 1664: 1663: 1662: 1661: 1660: 1659: 1658: 1642:Sutradhari2000 1631: 1621: 1620: 1619: 1618: 1617: 1616: 1503: 1502: 1461: 1458: 1457: 1456: 1407: 1406: 1365: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1343: 1336: 1329: 1312: 1311: 1293: 1292: 1291: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1256: 1255: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1248: 1247: 1230: 1229: 1228: 1227: 1226: 1225: 1224: 1223: 1193: 1192: 1191: 1190: 1189: 1188: 1167: 1164: 1161: 1158: 1155: 1142: 1141: 1140: 1139: 1138: 1137: 1134: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1099: 1098: 1097: 1096: 1080: 1062: 1048: 1018: 931: 930: 929: 928: 927: 889: 888: 886: 872: 779:38.101.155.250 770: 767: 766: 765: 733: 732: 679: 676: 652:38.101.155.250 608: 607: 591: 590: 570: 567: 544: 541: 525: 524: 523: 522: 503: 502: 501: 500: 499: 498: 497: 496: 414: 413: 385: 382: 379: 378: 375: 374: 371: 370: 363: 353: 352: 349:Low-importance 339: 329: 328: 321:Low-importance 317: 311: 310: 308: 305:India articles 276: 275: 259: 247: 246: 237:Low‑importance 225: 213: 212: 206: 195: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2502: 2491: 2488: 2486: 2483: 2481: 2478: 2476: 2473: 2471: 2468: 2466: 2463: 2461: 2458: 2456: 2453: 2452: 2450: 2441: 2437: 2433: 2429: 2428:been restored 2425: 2421: 2420: 2419: 2418: 2414: 2410: 2406: 2402: 2398: 2394: 2390: 2386: 2382: 2375: 2371: 2367: 2363: 2359: 2350: 2349: 2348: 2347: 2343: 2339: 2318: 2314: 2310: 2306: 2302: 2298: 2291: 2282: 2281: 2280: 2279: 2275: 2271: 2266: 2263: 2260: 2257: 2249: 2246:parameter to 2237: 2233: 2226: 2225: 2219: 2217: 2216: 2212: 2208: 2204: 2197: 2194: 2193: 2192: 2186: 2184: 2183: 2179: 2175: 2169: 2161: 2152: 2144: 2141: 2137: 2133: 2129: 2125: 2121: 2117: 2116: 2115: 2114: 2113: 2112: 2107: 2104: 2100: 2099: 2098: 2097: 2094: 2090: 2086: 2081: 2080: 2079: 2078: 2075: 2070: 2069: 2066: 2048: 2044: 2040: 2036: 2032: 2027: 2026: 2025: 2024: 2023: 2022: 2021: 2020: 2019: 2018: 2017: 2016: 2005: 2002: 1998: 1997: 1996: 1995: 1994: 1993: 1992: 1991: 1990: 1989: 1978: 1975: 1971: 1970: 1969: 1968: 1967: 1966: 1965: 1964: 1963: 1962: 1951: 1948: 1943: 1940: 1939: 1938: 1937: 1936: 1935: 1934: 1933: 1932: 1931: 1922: 1918: 1914: 1910: 1906: 1902: 1897: 1896: 1895: 1894: 1893: 1892: 1891: 1890: 1883: 1880: 1875: 1872: 1871: 1870: 1869: 1868: 1867: 1862: 1858: 1854: 1850: 1846: 1842: 1841: 1840: 1839: 1836: 1833: 1829: 1828: 1827: 1826: 1822: 1818: 1810: 1808: 1807: 1803: 1799: 1794: 1793: 1790: 1786: 1782: 1781: 1777: 1773: 1764: 1762: 1761: 1757: 1753: 1752:Utkarsh nagwa 1744: 1740: 1736: 1732: 1731:Utkarsh nagwa 1727: 1726: 1725: 1723: 1719: 1715: 1711: 1701: 1696: 1679: 1675: 1674: 1673: 1672: 1671: 1670: 1669: 1668: 1667: 1666: 1655: 1651: 1647: 1643: 1639: 1632: 1629: 1628: 1627: 1626: 1625: 1624: 1623: 1622: 1613: 1609: 1605: 1601: 1597: 1589: 1588: 1587: 1583: 1579: 1575: 1571: 1570: 1569: 1566: 1562: 1558: 1554: 1550: 1547: 1546: 1545: 1543: 1539: 1535: 1531: 1524: 1522: 1518: 1514: 1510: 1501: 1497: 1493: 1489: 1485: 1484: 1483: 1481: 1477: 1473: 1472:67.118.115.66 1469: 1459: 1455: 1451: 1447: 1443: 1439: 1435: 1431: 1430: 1429: 1427: 1423: 1419: 1418:67.118.115.66 1415: 1405: 1401: 1397: 1393: 1389: 1388: 1387: 1385: 1381: 1377: 1373: 1361: 1357: 1353: 1349: 1344: 1341: 1337: 1334: 1330: 1328: 1324: 1320: 1319: 1317: 1314: 1313: 1310: 1307: 1303: 1299: 1295: 1294: 1283: 1279: 1275: 1270: 1266: 1265: 1264: 1263: 1262: 1261: 1260: 1259: 1258: 1257: 1245: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1237: 1236: 1235: 1234: 1233: 1232: 1231: 1221: 1217: 1213: 1209: 1204: 1201: 1200: 1199: 1198: 1197: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1186: 1182: 1178: 1174: 1168: 1165: 1162: 1159: 1156: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1148: 1147: 1146: 1135: 1132: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1128: 1127: 1121: 1117: 1113: 1109: 1103: 1102: 1101: 1100: 1095: 1092: 1087: 1081: 1078: 1065: 1060: 1056: 1055: 1049: 1046: 1042: 1038: 1034: 1021: 1016: 1012: 1011: 1005: 1004: 1001: 1000: 999: 997: 993: 989: 988:67.118.115.66 985: 980: 977: 974: 969: 968: 964: 961: 958: 957: 953: 951: 946: 945: 941: 937: 926: 922: 918: 914: 909: 905: 904: 903: 900: 897: 891: 890: 885: 881: 877: 873: 871: 870: 866: 862: 857: 856: 853: 849: 845: 844: 840: 836: 831: 830: 826: 822: 817: 814: 810: 806: 802: 798: 789: 788: 784: 780: 774: 768: 764: 760: 756: 752: 751: 750: 749: 745: 741: 736: 731: 727: 723: 719: 715: 711: 707: 703: 700:is a clan of 699: 696: 695: 694: 693: 689: 685: 677: 675: 674: 671: 666: 662: 661: 657: 653: 649: 645: 641: 637: 630: 626: 622: 618: 612: 605: 604: 603: 602: 599: 597: 587: 583: 578: 577: 576: 575: 568: 566: 564: 560: 556: 552: 542: 540: 539: 535: 531: 530:Utkarsh nagwa 520: 519: 518: 515: 512: 505: 504: 495: 491: 487: 483: 482: 481: 478: 476: 470: 466: 461: 457: 453: 449: 444: 443: 442: 439: 437: 430: 429: 428: 427: 426: 425: 422: 420: 411: 406: 402: 401: 400: 399: 396: 394: 383: 368: 359: 355: 354: 350: 347:(assessed as 346: 345: 335: 331: 330: 326: 322: 316: 313: 312: 309: 292: 291: 286: 282: 281: 273: 262: 260: 257: 253: 252: 248: 234: 229: 226: 223: 219: 214: 210: 204: 196: 192: 187: 186: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 2404: 2379: 2357: 2322: 2294: 2289: 2270:Abhimanyu200 2267: 2264: 2261: 2258: 2255: 2247: 2236:edit request 2200: 2190: 2156: 2123: 2119: 2071: 2061: 2030: 1814: 1795: 1783: 1768: 1748: 1729:the pulpit. 1708:— Preceding 1705: 1694: 1636:— Preceding 1594:— Preceding 1556: 1534:64.105.168.2 1528:— Preceding 1525: 1513:64.105.168.2 1507:— Preceding 1504: 1466:— Preceding 1463: 1438:ad infinitum 1437: 1412:— Preceding 1408: 1376:64.105.168.2 1370:— Preceding 1366: 1316:Oppose merge 1315: 1267:Where would 1212:64.105.168.2 1206:— Preceding 1177:64.105.168.2 1171:— Preceding 1143: 1112:64.105.168.2 1106:— Preceding 1076: 1067:. Retrieved 1053: 1044: 1040: 1036: 1032: 1023:. Retrieved 1009: 982:— Preceding 970: 965: 962: 959: 954: 947: 933: 908:no consensus 907: 901: 895: 892: 858: 846: 832: 818: 795:— Preceding 790: 775: 772: 737: 734: 681: 665:User:Joy1963 663: 615:— Preceding 609: 595: 592: 572: 549:— Preceding 546: 526: 474: 418: 415: 403:Yadava is a 387: 366: 342: 320: 290:project page 288: 278: 272:India portal 209:WikiProjects 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 2432:AukusRuckus 2409:AukusRuckus 2362:AukusRuckus 2124:Mahabharata 2031:Mahabharata 1942:User:Sitush 1874:User:Sitush 917:Mkativerata 511:MahenSingha 467:because of 148:free images 31:not a forum 2449:Categories 2424:Yaduvanshi 2405:Yaduvanshi 2381:Yaduvanshi 2336:, thanks. 2240:|answered= 1849:WP:PRIMARY 1549:JanetteDoe 1442:Talk:Yadav 2132:Wikiquote 1845:WP:HISTRS 1318:because: 1069:4 October 1025:4 October 640:chudasama 450:page and 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 2309:contribs 2136:utcursch 2035:Utcursch 1710:unsigned 1650:contribs 1638:unsigned 1608:contribs 1596:unsigned 1561:utcursch 1530:unsigned 1509:unsigned 1468:unsigned 1414:unsigned 1372:unsigned 1323:Utcursch 1302:utcursch 1208:unsigned 1173:unsigned 1108:unsigned 1031:Quote: " 984:unsigned 913:WP:MERGE 809:contribs 801:D murari 797:unsigned 777:shudras? 740:Raosaab7 684:Raosaab7 644:Raosaab7 638:and yes 629:contribs 617:unsigned 551:unsigned 543:Untitled 486:Raosaab7 405:Sanskrit 367:May 2012 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 2338:Rau6590 2168:Joy1963 1905:WP:NPOV 1901:Kalhana 1600:Balaucf 1075:Quote: 720:etc. -- 596:Joy1963 589:Thanks. 475:Joy1963 419:Joy1963 323:on the 233:History 199:B-class 154:WP refs 142:scholar 2401:Yadava 2395:, and 2085:Sitush 2039:Sitush 1913:Sitush 1853:Sitush 1817:Sitush 1578:Sitush 1492:Sitush 1446:Sitush 1396:Sitush 1352:Sitush 1274:Sitush 1269:Abhira 1090:«Talk» 1039:, and 1037:Goalas 950:YADAVA 944:Yadava 884:Yadava 718:Jadeja 706:Yadava 702:Yadava 514:(Talk) 205:scale. 126:Google 25:Yadava 2300:space 2296:Delta 2244:|ans= 2234:This 1591:it. 1574:WP:AN 1434:Yadav 1392:Yadav 1340:Yadav 1244:socks 1077:Yadav 1045:Yadav 1041:Ahirs 1033:Gopis 936:Yadav 876:Yadav 755:¢ℓαяк 722:¢ℓαяк 714:Bhati 710:Saini 708:like 698:Yadav 465:Hindi 456:Yadav 410:Hindi 296:India 285:India 228:India 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 2436:talk 2426:has 2413:talk 2397:here 2393:here 2389:here 2383:has 2366:talk 2358:Done 2342:talk 2325:lit. 2305:talk 2290:Done 2274:talk 2211:talk 2178:talk 2140:talk 2089:talk 2043:talk 1917:talk 1857:talk 1851:. - 1847:and 1821:talk 1802:talk 1776:talk 1756:talk 1735:talk 1718:talk 1646:talk 1604:talk 1582:talk 1565:talk 1538:talk 1517:talk 1496:talk 1476:talk 1450:talk 1422:talk 1400:talk 1380:talk 1356:talk 1350:. - 1348:this 1306:talk 1298:here 1278:talk 1216:talk 1181:talk 1116:talk 1071:2011 1059:ISBN 1027:2011 1015:ISBN 992:talk 952:. 942:and 940:Ahir 921:talk 915:. -- 882:and 880:Ahir 865:talk 839:talk 825:talk 805:talk 783:talk 759:talk 744:talk 726:talk 688:talk 656:talk 648:talk 625:talk 582:NPOV 559:talk 534:talk 490:talk 435:Ikon 392:Ikon 384:Prod 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 2242:or 2205:. — 2122:or 1557:one 1440:at 586:POV 315:Low 176:TWL 2451:: 2438:) 2415:) 2391:, 2368:) 2344:) 2311:) 2307:• 2276:) 2248:no 2213:) 2180:) 2138:| 2103:N8 2091:) 2074:N8 2065:N8 2045:) 2001:N8 1974:N8 1947:N8 1919:) 1879:N8 1859:) 1832:N8 1823:) 1804:) 1789:N8 1778:) 1758:) 1737:) 1720:) 1652:) 1648:• 1610:) 1606:• 1584:) 1563:| 1540:) 1519:) 1498:) 1478:) 1452:) 1424:) 1402:) 1382:) 1358:) 1304:| 1280:) 1218:) 1183:) 1118:) 1035:, 994:) 938:, 923:) 878:, 867:) 852:N8 841:) 827:) 811:) 807:• 785:) 761:) 746:) 728:) 716:, 712:, 690:) 670:N8 658:) 627:• 561:) 536:) 492:) 351:). 231:: 156:) 54:; 2434:( 2411:( 2364:( 2340:( 2334:' 2328:' 2303:( 2272:( 2209:( 2176:( 2170:: 2166:@ 2162:: 2158:@ 2087:( 2041:( 1915:( 1855:( 1819:( 1800:( 1774:( 1754:( 1733:( 1716:( 1644:( 1602:( 1580:( 1536:( 1515:( 1494:( 1474:( 1448:( 1420:( 1398:( 1378:( 1354:( 1276:( 1214:( 1179:( 1114:( 1073:. 1029:. 990:( 919:( 863:( 837:( 823:( 803:( 781:( 757:( 742:( 724:( 686:( 654:( 646:( 623:( 557:( 532:( 488:( 369:. 327:. 293:. 211:: 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 58:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index