Knowledge

Talk:Zeno's paradoxes

Source 📝

936:: "A version of nonstandard analysis, Internal Set Theory, has been used to provide a resolution of Zeno's paradoxes of motion. This resolution is inadequate because the application of Internal Set Theory to the paradoxes requires a model of the world that is not in accordance with either experience or intuition. A model of standard mathematics in which the ordinary real numbers are defined in terms of rational intervals does provide a formalism for understanding the paradoxes. This model suggests that in discussing motion, only intervals, rather than instants, of time are meaningful. The approach presented here reconciles resolutions of the paradoxes based on considering a finite number of acts with those based on analysis of the full infinite set Zeno seems to require. The paper concludes with a brief discussion of the classical and quantum mechanics of performing an infinite number of acts in a finite time." 1168:"According to this, the length of the hypotenuse of a right angled triangle in discretized space is always equal to the length of one of the two sides, in contradiction to geometry." -this sentence seems problematic, because it relates space with a distinstive attribute (discretized) to geometry without an an attribute. i cannot propose a solution since the meaning of "discretized" is unbeknowst to me, but i can propose an initial direction of reseach that is try replacing "geometry" with " euclidian geometry" as a formal (linguistical) corrction and check the meaning and reltiobn between "discretionalized" and "euclidian". 1176:
becomes proven enough to be accepted as not just a theory but rather the actual dscription of reality (if and when that happens) it will remind us that zeno was wrong in his assumption about infinite divisibility and that can be taken as a simple cause of his paradoxes. (if i take correctly a paradox takes a seemingly correct line of arguments and points to a result with it that is obviously contradicting reality, saying either the line of thought is not as correct as we think and then lets find the mistake in it, or reality is not what it is belived and then lets find the mistake in the belief about it.)
466: 456: 435: 229: 544: 407: 391: 656: 988:): 'Kip Sewell holds an MLIS from the University of South Carolina and currently works as an information professional. He has also received BA and MA degrees in Philosophy and has been a college lecturer. "The Cosmic Sphere" (1999) is Sewell's first work on the subject of cosmology. He is currently revising the book and continues to explore issues in science, philosophy, and theology as an independent researcher.' 220: 1215:. This makes more sense, as the figure illustrates how each of the successive stages in the race takes less time and brings Achilles closer to the tortoise until the tortoise is overtaken. The exposition is immediately followed by a discussion of the associated convergent infinite series. In the English Knowledge, the infinite-series discussion is in a different article, 293: 262: 303: 1240:
The resolution of the paradoxes comes from understanding that if someone can direct your attention to an irrelevant part of a system, while you think you are looking at the whole system, they can convince you of foolish things about the whole system. So if you look at shorter and shorter segments of
1171:
also im missing from the article a simple worded paragraph that would tell that the zeno paradoxes result in an so to say impossibility of the event observed in reality because the question is framed to look at a time frame that by its definition excludes the event of achilles reaching the turtle or
1175:
also theres this italian guy, carlo rovelli who deserves mention as the author of some books proposing that the infinite division used in the zeno paradoxes actually is in contradiction with the physical nature of the world. its not that he talks about zeno, its that when his quantum physics theory
1270:
One risk of being a debunker or skeptic is that you might not be skeptical about your own skepticism. Your explanation is great until you unequivocally declare "nothing to do with infinities". I think the history of math will bear out that the notion of limits is a very old problem (not initially
765:
This list is intended to collect references thought to be relevant for the article. Delete entries only when they are blatantly and obviously inappropriate. In general, we want not only to collect useful references, but also be able to check new additions against previous discussions that lead to
1203:
Is the image worth preserving? I propose to delete it. It adds nothing to the text. It merely illustrates what is obvious anyhow, that Achilles, running at 10 m/s, will overtake anything running more slowly including, for example, a squirrel running at 5 m/s. (Squirrels can go that fast, though
866:
After the relevant entries in this encyclopedia, the place to begin any further investigation is Salmon (2001), which contains some of the most important articles on Zeno up to 1970, and an impressively comprehensive bibliography of works in English in the Twentieth Century
1219:. The figure should be here, if anywhere, though the argument in this section supposes the tortoise's speed to be 0.1 m/s. Modifying the graph to suppose that the tortoise is going 0.1 or 0.2 m/s is impractical, since the line for the tortoise would be nearly horizontal. 1241:
time (of a runner's or a Hare's motion), because a questioner like Zeno led you down that path, you discover the "paradox" that your inquiry doesn't tell you anything accurate about the characteristics of the overall motion. Or as
1142:
Philip K. Dick's short science-fiction story "The Indefatigable Frog" concerns an experiment to determine whether a frog which continually leaps half the distance to the top of a well will ever be able to get out of the
1146:
Allama Iqbal's book The Reconstruction of Religious Thought in Islam discusses the paradox in Lecture II The Philosophical Test of the Revelations of Religious Experience, and suggests that motion is not continuous but
166: 1315: 977:
Footnote 10 on page 410 (for page 15 in section 3 "Infinite Time" of chapter 1 "the Container of All Things") discusses "proposals at the ability to cross an infinite provided infinite acceleration is assumed".
1305: 1320: 522: 1013:
Paul A. Fishwick, ed. (1 June 2007). "15.6 "Pathological Behavior Classes" in chapter 15 "Hybrid Dynamic Systems: Modeling and Execution" by Pieter J. Mosterman, The Mathworks, Inc.".
233: 1355: 160: 1271:
solved by Newton and Leibnitz when they formulated calculus) and Zeno was a key motivator by framing it as a paradox. But what do I know? I'm not a historian of science.
324:
on Knowledge. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the
1360: 555: 1340: 1133:
Paul Hornschemeier's most recent graphic novel, The Three Paradoxes, contains a comic version of Zeno presenting his three paradoxes to his fellow philosophers.
1350: 1330: 398: 351: 272: 1150:
Ursula K. Le Guin's character of Shevek in The Dispossessed discusses the arrow paradox in great amusement with his un-understanding classmates as a child.
361: 1370: 512: 92: 1136:
Zadie Smith references Zeno's arrow paradox, and, more briefly, Zeno's Achilles and tortoise paradox, at the end of Chapter 17 in her novel White Teeth.
57: 1300: 1208: 1345: 414: 276: 1197: 1310: 1196:
The image supposes that a tortoise can run 5 m/s. No source supports this speed, and neither Zeno nor Aristotle supposes this to be possible. The
488: 1365: 1335: 326: 98: 1325: 668: 1177: 570: 1019:. Chapman & Hall/CRC Computer and Information Science (hardcover ed.). Boca Raton, Florida, USA: CRC Press. pp. 15–22 to 15–23. 565: 880:
The bibliography of my 1970 hardcover edition has 143 entries, the 2001 edition cited above has at least 218 (preview limit, sorry).
1023: 954: 838: 769:
The 2001 edition of Salmon's anthology lists at least 218 sources, so it is safe to say that this bibliography cannot be considered
479: 440: 1139:
Brian Massumi shoots Zeno's "philosophical arrow" in the opening chapter of Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation.
714: 709: 702: 697: 692: 685: 680: 675: 626: 316: 267: 181: 1375: 1295: 561: 148: 112: 43: 1252:
So this "paradox" has nothing to do with infinities or calculus, and everything to do with attention, focus, and distraction.
117: 33: 1089:
Criticizes the "Received View" on Zeno as untenable. Maintains that a "generally overlooked" key to Zeno arguments is that "
87: 242: 747: 78: 142: 543: 726: 199: 1226: 138: 974:
Pages 14-15 (section 3 "Infinite Time" of chapter 1 "the Container of All Things") discuss the arrow paradox.
1181: 122: 1200:
for tortoises is 0.28 m/s and the accompanying text, unlike the image caption, implies a speed of 0.2 m/s.
560:, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the 1060: 188: 872: 248: 981: 465: 994:
IMO, a minor primary source, apparently not peer-reviewed, by a philosopher very early in his career.
1255:
I have not found a Runcible Source that has noticed this, so it is not suitable for the article yet.
1115: 1098: 999: 885: 219: 1222: 858:
Salmon's book is one of the best on the subject. Huggett, in his article "Zeno's Paradoxes" in the
174: 68: 487:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1276: 1246: 1076: 1044: 1014: 732: 471: 204: 83: 1249:, "If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they don't have to worry about the answers." 455: 434: 154: 37: 1020: 951: 918: 835: 802: 778: 308: 64: 945: 1260: 910: 869: 825: 728: 655: 201: 1111: 1094: 995: 881: 933: 1242: 1048: 991:
Apart from this book, Scirus, Google Scholar and WorldCat turned up nothing by Sewell.
406: 390: 1289: 1272: 899:
Alper, Joseph S.; Bridger, Mark (1997). "Mathematics, Models and Zeno's Paradoxes".
862: 1256: 1043:
Defines "Zeno behavior", a concept from the field of verification and design of
829: 806: 782: 484: 914: 461: 321: 298: 921: 1280: 1264: 1230: 1185: 1119: 1102: 1003: 889: 875: 730: 203: 766:
exclusion. Provide diffs, and update section links when they get archived.
1216: 901: 1107: 985: 320:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to 1080: 292: 261: 1192:
Remove the distance vs. time graph in § Achilles and the Tortoise?
1061:"Zeno's Paradoxes. A Cardinal Problem - I. On Zenonian Plurality" 733: 649: 213: 205: 28: 15: 564:. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be 405: 389: 1316:
Knowledge level-5 vital articles in Philosophy and religion
1157: 773:
near comprehensive before we have passed the 200 mark.
619: 600: 1207:
In the French Knowledge, the graph is associated with
173: 574:
of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
483:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 1306:
Knowledge vital articles in Philosophy and religion
372: 1321:C-Class vital articles in Philosophy and religion 1236:If Zeno can get you asking the wrong questions... 46:for general discussion of the article's subject. 741:This page has archives. Sections older than 187: 8: 1356:High-importance Ancient philosophy articles 1217:Infinity § Zeno: Achilles and the tortoise 1153:add missing refs from Rucker section below 1091:they do not presuppose space, neither time 579: 538: 429: 369: 256: 1204:they're not noted for sustained effort.) 431: 258: 217: 1361:Ancient philosophy task force articles 751:when more than 4 sections are present. 330:about philosophy content on Knowledge. 556:Philosophy and religion good articles 7: 1341:High-importance metaphysics articles 1016:Handbook of dynamic system modeling 477:This article is within the scope of 314:This article is within the scope of 1351:C-Class Ancient philosophy articles 1331:High-importance Philosophy articles 860:Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 784:Modern science and Zeno's paradoxes 247:It is of interest to the following 36:for discussing improvements to the 14: 1371:Mid-priority mathematics articles 944:Sewell, Kip K. (1 October 1999). 808:Modern science and Zeno's paradox 745:may be automatically archived by 497:Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics 1301:Knowledge level-5 vital articles 654: 542: 500:Template:WikiProject Mathematics 464: 454: 433: 336:Knowledge:WikiProject Philosophy 301: 291: 260: 227: 218: 58:Click here to start a new topic. 1346:Metaphysics task force articles 1172:the arrow reaching its target. 517:This article has been rated as 356:This article has been rated as 339:Template:WikiProject Philosophy 1311:C-Class level-5 vital articles 1: 934:the official page at Springer 890:08:32, 25 February 2010 (UTC) 876:14:22, 13 February 2010 (UTC) 491:and see a list of open tasks. 55:Put new text under old text. 1366:C-Class mathematics articles 1336:C-Class metaphysics articles 1281:05:11, 11 October 2022 (UTC) 1265:04:40, 11 October 2022 (UTC) 1186:15:04, 2 February 2020 (UTC) 1326:C-Class Philosophy articles 1231:22:52, 25 August 2020 (UTC) 787:. Wesleyan University Press 63:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 1392: 568:. Editors may also seek a 362:project's importance scale 1120:19:52, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 1103:17:33, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 1004:01:17, 2 March 2010 (UTC) 640: 627:Good article reassessment 582: 578: 516: 449: 413: 397: 368: 355: 286: 255: 93:Be welcoming to newcomers 22:Skip to table of contents 523:project's priority scale 21: 915:10.1023/A:1004967023017 480:WikiProject Mathematics 373:Associated task forces: 1376:Delisted good articles 1296:C-Class vital articles 1156:add refs deleted with 834:. Hackett Publishing. 748:Lowercase sigmabot III 410: 394: 317:WikiProject Philosophy 88:avoid personal attacks 1108:Her official homepage 643:Delisted good article 562:good article criteria 409: 393: 234:level-5 vital article 113:Neutral point of view 982:Amazon's author page 608:Good article nominee 503:mathematics articles 118:No original research 950:. Nova Publishers. 342:Philosophy articles 620:September 14, 2006 583:Article milestones 472:Mathematics portal 415:Ancient philosophy 411: 395: 327:general discussion 243:content assessment 99:dispute resolution 60: 1247:Gravity's Rainbow 1209:a section on the 947:The Cosmic Sphere 826:Salmon, Wesley C. 755: 754: 720: 719: 648: 647: 636: 635: 601:February 13, 2006 537: 536: 533: 532: 529: 528: 428: 427: 424: 423: 420: 419: 309:Philosophy portal 212: 211: 79:Assume good faith 56: 27: 26: 1383: 1075: 1073: 1071: 1065: 1059:Verelst, Karin. 1036: 1034: 1032: 967: 965: 963: 925: 851: 849: 847: 831:Zeno's paradoxes 819: 817: 815: 796: 794: 792: 750: 734: 672: 671: 658: 650: 641:Current status: 622: 603: 580: 550:Zeno's paradoxes 546: 539: 505: 504: 501: 498: 495: 474: 469: 468: 458: 451: 450: 445: 437: 430: 380: 370: 344: 343: 340: 337: 334: 311: 306: 305: 304: 295: 288: 287: 282: 279: 264: 257: 240: 231: 230: 223: 222: 214: 206: 192: 191: 177: 108:Article policies 38:Zeno's paradoxes 29: 16: 1391: 1390: 1386: 1385: 1384: 1382: 1381: 1380: 1286: 1285: 1238: 1194: 1166: 1130: 1110:(5 March 2010) 1069: 1067: 1063: 1058: 1030: 1028: 1026: 1012: 961: 959: 957: 943: 898: 845: 843: 841: 824: 813: 811: 803:Grünbaum, Adolf 801: 790: 788: 779:Grünbaum, Adolf 777: 763: 746: 735: 729: 663: 618: 599: 552:was one of the 502: 499: 496: 493: 492: 470: 463: 443: 378: 358:High-importance 341: 338: 335: 332: 331: 307: 302: 300: 281:High‑importance 280: 270: 241:on Knowledge's 238: 228: 208: 207: 202: 134: 129: 128: 127: 104: 74: 12: 11: 5: 1389: 1387: 1379: 1378: 1373: 1368: 1363: 1358: 1353: 1348: 1343: 1338: 1333: 1328: 1323: 1318: 1313: 1308: 1303: 1298: 1288: 1287: 1284: 1283: 1243:Thomas Pynchon 1237: 1234: 1213:of the paradox 1193: 1190: 1165: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1154: 1151: 1148: 1144: 1140: 1137: 1134: 1129: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1105: 1084: 1083: 1055: 1054: 1053: 1052: 1049:hybrid systems 1038: 1037: 1024: 1009: 1008: 1007: 1006: 992: 989: 978: 975: 969: 968: 955: 940: 939: 938: 937: 932:Abstract from 927: 926: 909:(1): 143–166. 895: 894: 893: 892: 878: 853: 852: 839: 828:(March 2001). 821: 820: 798: 797: 762: 759: 757: 753: 752: 740: 737: 736: 731: 727: 725: 722: 721: 718: 717: 712: 706: 705: 700: 695: 689: 688: 683: 678: 665: 664: 659: 653: 646: 645: 638: 637: 634: 633: 630: 623: 615: 614: 611: 604: 596: 595: 592: 589: 585: 584: 576: 575: 547: 535: 534: 531: 530: 527: 526: 515: 509: 508: 506: 489:the discussion 476: 475: 459: 447: 446: 438: 426: 425: 422: 421: 418: 417: 412: 402: 401: 396: 386: 385: 383: 381: 375: 374: 366: 365: 354: 348: 347: 345: 313: 312: 296: 284: 283: 265: 253: 252: 246: 224: 210: 209: 200: 198: 197: 194: 193: 131: 130: 126: 125: 120: 115: 106: 105: 103: 102: 95: 90: 81: 75: 73: 72: 61: 52: 51: 48: 47: 41: 25: 24: 19: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1388: 1377: 1374: 1372: 1369: 1367: 1364: 1362: 1359: 1357: 1354: 1352: 1349: 1347: 1344: 1342: 1339: 1337: 1334: 1332: 1329: 1327: 1324: 1322: 1319: 1317: 1314: 1312: 1309: 1307: 1304: 1302: 1299: 1297: 1294: 1293: 1291: 1282: 1278: 1274: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1266: 1262: 1258: 1253: 1250: 1248: 1244: 1235: 1233: 1232: 1228: 1224: 1220: 1218: 1214: 1212: 1205: 1201: 1199: 1191: 1189: 1187: 1183: 1179: 1178:89.134.199.32 1173: 1169: 1163: 1159: 1155: 1152: 1149: 1145: 1141: 1138: 1135: 1132: 1131: 1127: 1121: 1117: 1113: 1109: 1106: 1104: 1100: 1096: 1092: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1085: 1082: 1078: 1062: 1057: 1056: 1050: 1046: 1042: 1041: 1040: 1039: 1027: 1025:9781584885658 1022: 1018: 1017: 1011: 1010: 1005: 1001: 997: 993: 990: 987: 983: 979: 976: 973: 972: 971: 970: 958: 956:9781560726616 953: 949: 948: 942: 941: 935: 931: 930: 929: 928: 923: 920: 916: 912: 908: 904: 903: 897: 896: 891: 887: 883: 879: 877: 874: 871: 868: 863: 861: 857: 856: 855: 854: 842: 840:9780872205604 837: 833: 832: 827: 823: 822: 810: 809: 804: 800: 799: 786: 785: 780: 776: 775: 774: 772: 767: 760: 758: 749: 744: 739: 738: 724: 723: 716: 713: 711: 708: 707: 704: 701: 699: 696: 694: 691: 690: 687: 684: 682: 679: 677: 674: 673: 670: 667: 666: 662: 657: 652: 651: 644: 639: 631: 629: 628: 624: 621: 617: 616: 612: 610: 609: 605: 602: 598: 597: 593: 590: 587: 586: 581: 577: 573: 572: 567: 563: 559: 558: 557: 551: 548: 545: 541: 540: 524: 520: 514: 511: 510: 507: 490: 486: 482: 481: 473: 467: 462: 460: 457: 453: 452: 448: 442: 439: 436: 432: 416: 408: 404: 403: 400: 392: 388: 387: 384: 382: 377: 376: 371: 367: 363: 359: 353: 350: 349: 346: 329: 328: 323: 319: 318: 310: 299: 297: 294: 290: 289: 285: 278: 274: 269: 266: 263: 259: 254: 250: 244: 236: 235: 225: 221: 216: 215: 196: 195: 190: 186: 183: 180: 176: 172: 168: 165: 162: 159: 156: 153: 150: 147: 144: 140: 137: 136:Find sources: 133: 132: 124: 123:Verifiability 121: 119: 116: 114: 111: 110: 109: 100: 96: 94: 91: 89: 85: 82: 80: 77: 76: 70: 66: 65:Learn to edit 62: 59: 54: 53: 50: 49: 45: 39: 35: 31: 30: 23: 20: 18: 17: 1254: 1251: 1239: 1221: 1210: 1206: 1202: 1198:world record 1195: 1174: 1170: 1167: 1090: 1081:math/0604639 1068:. Retrieved 1066:. PhilPapers 1045:timed event 1029:. Retrieved 1015: 960:. Retrieved 946: 906: 900: 865: 859: 844:. Retrieved 830: 812:. Retrieved 807: 789:. Retrieved 783: 770: 768: 764: 761:Bibliography 756: 742: 660: 642: 625: 607: 606: 571:reassessment 569: 554: 553: 549: 519:Mid-priority 518: 478: 444:Mid‑priority 357: 325: 315: 249:WikiProjects 232: 184: 178: 170: 163: 157: 151: 145: 135: 107: 32:This is the 1223:Peter Brown 1164:herman weyl 870:Paul August 846:13 February 814:13 February 791:13 February 566:renominated 494:Mathematics 485:mathematics 441:Mathematics 399:Metaphysics 273:Metaphysics 161:free images 44:not a forum 1290:Categories 1211:resolution 1112:Paradoctor 1095:Paradoctor 996:Paradoctor 882:Paradoctor 333:Philosophy 322:philosophy 268:Philosophy 1245:wrote in 1158:this edit 1147:discrete. 922:0039-7857 715:Archive 8 710:Archive 7 703:Archive 6 698:Archive 5 693:Archive 4 686:Archive 3 681:Archive 2 676:Archive 1 237:is rated 101:if needed 84:Be polite 34:talk page 1273:Martindo 1031:5 March 902:Synthese 864:writes: 805:(1968). 781:(1967). 771:anywhere 661:Archives 632:Delisted 69:get help 42:This is 40:article. 1070:5 March 986:WebCite 962:1 March 743:90 days 591:Process 521:on the 360:on the 277:Ancient 239:C-class 167:WP refs 155:scholar 1257:Gnuish 613:Listed 594:Result 245:scale. 139:Google 1143:well. 1128:to do 1077:arXiv 1064:(PDF) 980:From 669:Index 226:This 182:JSTOR 143:books 97:Seek 1277:talk 1261:talk 1227:talk 1182:talk 1116:talk 1099:talk 1072:2010 1047:and 1033:2010 1021:ISBN 1000:talk 964:2010 952:ISBN 919:ISSN 886:talk 848:2010 836:ISBN 816:2010 793:2010 588:Date 352:High 175:FENS 149:news 86:and 1093:". 911:doi 907:110 513:Mid 189:TWL 1292:: 1279:) 1263:) 1229:) 1188:. 1184:) 1118:) 1101:) 1002:) 917:. 905:. 888:) 379:/ 275:/ 271:: 169:) 67:; 1275:( 1259:( 1225:( 1180:( 1114:( 1097:( 1079:: 1074:. 1051:. 1035:. 998:( 984:( 966:. 924:. 913:: 884:( 873:☎ 867:. 850:. 818:. 795:. 525:. 364:. 251:: 185:· 179:· 171:· 164:· 158:· 152:· 146:· 141:( 71:.

Index

Skip to table of contents
talk page
Zeno's paradoxes
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL

level-5 vital article
content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Philosophy

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.