86:
138:
The use of this template does not imply a final or consensus view of how any given source should be assessed. Though it may be used to summarize a developing consensus, it may also reflect the assessments of a single editor in the course of a
201:) provides a visually clear means of presenting as assessment of sources against each of these three criteria, as well as an overall assessment derived from these criterion assessments.
48:
288:
101:
321:
284:
97:
191:
ORGCRIT and other guidelines expand on what is meant by "significant coverage", "reliability", "independence", and "secondary source". This template (with
105:
350:
340:
270:
355:
317:
278:
93:
63:
39:
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor.
187:
if it has been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject."
131:
345:
53:
195:
117:
32:
58:
148:
126:
69:
180:
176:
124:. It generates a source assessment table, which contains assessments of sources with respect to
274:
152:
334:
172:
168:
164:
80:
160:
233:<!--See description of arguments at {{tl|ORGCRIT assess}}-->
309:
301:
297:
112:
This template encloses one or more calls to template
127:
the notability guideline for organizations (ORGCRIT)
294:Editors can experiment in this template's sandbox
157:
8:
151:is a benchmark for assessing the presumed
15:
7:
351:Knowledge (XXG) namespace templates
14:
279:Template:ORGCRIT assess table/doc
155:of organizations. From ORGCRIT:
84:
341:Articles for deletion templates
1:
372:
268:
322:Subpages of this template
130:. It is meant for use in
75:
356:Talk namespace templates
208:
18:Created with templates
316:Add categories to the
189:
89:Template documentation
68:Overall value toward
59:Significant coverage?
214:ORGCRIT assess table
132:deletion discussions
23:ORGCRIT assess table
346:Rationale templates
41:
16:
79:
78:
40:
363:
313:
305:
292:
264:
260:
256:
253:
250:
247:
243:
240:
237:
234:
231:
227:
224:
221:
218:
215:
212:
200:
194:
122:
116:
109:
90:
88:
87:
42:
37:
31:
27:
21:
17:
371:
370:
366:
365:
364:
362:
361:
360:
331:
330:
328:
326:
325:
315:
307:
295:
293:
282:
267:
266:
265:
262:
258:
254:
251:
248:
245:
241:
238:
235:
232:
229:
225:
222:
219:
216:
213:
210:
207:
198:
192:
146:
120:
114:
110:
91:
85:
83:
38:
35:
29:
25:
19:
12:
11:
5:
369:
367:
359:
358:
353:
348:
343:
333:
332:
306:and testcases
252:ORGCRIT assess
239:ORGCRIT assess
223:ORGCRIT assess
209:
206:
203:
196:ORGCRIT assess
145:
142:
118:ORGCRIT assess
82:
81:
77:
76:
73:
72:
66:
61:
56:
51:
46:
33:ORGCRIT assess
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
368:
357:
354:
352:
349:
347:
344:
342:
339:
338:
336:
329:
323:
319:
311:
303:
299:
290:
286:
280:
276:
272:
271:documentation
204:
202:
197:
188:
186:
182:
178:
174:
170:
166:
162:
156:
154:
150:
143:
141:
140:
135:
133:
129:
128:
123:
119:
107:
103:
99:
95:
74:
71:
67:
65:
62:
60:
57:
55:
52:
50:
47:
44:
43:
34:
24:
327:
199:}}
193:{{
190:
184:
169:organization
158:
147:
137:
136:
125:
121:}}
115:{{
113:
111:
49:Independent?
36:}}
30:{{
26:}}
22:
20:{{
275:transcluded
165:corporation
139:discussion.
104:] [
100:] [
96:] [
335:Categories
269:The above
153:notability
144:Background
64:Secondary?
320:subpage.
54:Reliable?
300:|
289:history
287:|
185:notable
181:service
177:product
161:company
149:ORGCRIT
102:history
70:ORGCRIT
45:Source
314:pages.
310:create
302:mirror
298:create
277:from
205:Usage
179:, or
173:group
108:]
106:purge
92:[
318:/doc
285:edit
261:...
257:...
244:...
228:...
98:edit
94:view
28:and
273:is
183:is
159:"A
337::
281:.
263:}}
259:}}
249:{{
246:}}
236:{{
230:}}
220:{{
211:{{
175:,
171:,
167:,
163:,
134:.
324:.
312:)
308:(
304:)
296:(
291:)
283:(
255:|
242:|
226:|
217:|
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.