456:
subject. "Whom" is only used when it is on the receiving end of the verb (i.e. when it is the object, "whom did you call?"). Who is used when it is doing the action, which it seems to be. ("who called you?") Perhaps we can change this template OR make an alternate "by who?" template. Why am I drawing this distinction? Well, it seems to me that if you say "by whom" you are trying to follow the who/whom distinctions, but that is incorrect. Please, a grammarian help me! Correct me if I'm wrong!
22:
600:
499:
371:
1040:
1202:
568:
428:
215:
1030:
1134:
Where appropriate, application developers may selectively target users of suitable devices based by feature requisite, as commonly practiced when an application depends on a particular hardware attribute of the device, such as a motion sensor (for motion-dependent games) or a front-facing camera (for
455:
Whenever this template seems to be commonly used, say like this: "It has been suggested " it is grammatically incorrect, I believe. This is one of those less common cases where whom is used when who ought to be. Dissecting the sentence, "it" is the object, "suggested" is the "verb" and "who" is the
1114:
What makes this come across as brochureware is that both "many" and "can be" are qualitative restrictions cooking in the same kitchen. Then "based on" wades into the conversation, and you don't know which chef to slay. It shouldn't be the reader's job to decide this (therefore brochureware rarely
956:
Thanks. I agree that having it say somthing different every where would be bad and that if it really was important to have something different someone could do it maualy and not haveing that option would make it less likelly for people to have something different then everywhere else without a good
934:
to add the section heading. I'll document them all if the change goes live. But to change the displayed text, there'd have to be a little extra code that defaulted to something standard, but depending on what the user put in the template, changed to suit. As I say though, I think that's a bad idea.
1153:
If this template ought not cover the latter, what template should? And how will the average spot-checking diligence bunny such as myself find out? Most usefully, by direct mention in the article here. (A spot-checking diligence bunny RTFMs all the time, but never front to back, and thus relies
876:
solution that you use now or write the wikitext yourself. This would probaby be ok for the sort of person who needs that as very few times would that be needed. On a side note, is this parameter you are thinking of optional (you said it would be)? If so then why did you decide to have an
471:
I think you're wrong. "by whom" is a prepositional phrase, and in a prepositional phrase we use the object form (where that matters). A useful trick for "who" vs "whom" is to replace it with "he" or "him" and see if it makes sense, although you may have to take into account
72:, a collaborative effort to improve and manage Knowledge (XXG)'s inline footnote, cleanup and dispute templates. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
861:
I agree that "Discuss" is much better than "Talk". I don't really know much about templates right now but I see that a lot of them have extera parameters for situations that are not 'normal'. In that situation you could go with
1122:
Many applications can be targeted to specific users based on a particular hardware attribute of their device, such as a motion sensor (for motion-dependent games) or a front-facing camera (for online video calling).
1091:
targeted to specific users based on a particular hardware attribute of their device, such as a motion sensor (for motion-dependent games) or a front-facing camera (for online video calling).
631:
i would suggest adding the same 'Visual effect' example under the usage header. Also, wouldn't it be better to also use {{By whom|{{subst:DATE}}}} instead of manually adding the date?
1139:
I don't seem to be able to get the tone right on this sentence (for the audience of this page), so perhaps I would have been better off simply flagging the problem and moving along.
813:
I just want to add that maybe there should be an optional parameter for what should be said (right now it is "Discuss" but it could be "Talk" or something simmilar if need comes up).
264:
is missing in the template, there simply are to many verbs to choose between, such as "worn by whome", "eaten by whome", "rejected by whome", "hailed by whome". ... said:
885:(i hope that is the right link) because if there is a problem it would not effect much if you tested it already. Also I personly like the parameter to be called
76:
935:
If it rolls out, and is used, imagine if every time you saw it, it said something different? That incontinuity would rub people the wrong way (it would me).
1233:
1110:
a particular hardware attribute of their device, such as a motion sensor (for motion-dependent games) or a front-facing camera (for online video calling).
648:
This second point I don't see. There is no way to add the date automatically. We simply copy the code from the documentation page, or yes, type it out.
68:
53:
343:
This message is to inform people monitoring this talk page that there is an "editprotected" request involving this and several other templates at
1009:
link text or the dash? Should it render an error message if the section is incorrectly formatted and/or add the page to a maintenance category?
1127:
Not only are there two chefs in the kitchen, but there are many other parties at the table holding knives, and looking vaguely chef-like.
799:. I don't know if I would or would not use it but I think it would be valuable to have this and nothing would be broken by its inclution.
1095:
The dubious grammatical structure set off my brochureware alarm, and I waded in with a sledge hammer. Then I started actually thinking.
352:
1036:- I am satisfied that there are no objections, so have added the param and updated the documentation. Thanks for your feedback
634:
33:
186:
1068:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
716:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
938:
Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you ever want help with techy things like templates, scripts and such.
1187:
with "July 2020" instead of "date=July 2020"; there was no error and it was not put in the correct monthly category.
139:'s default wording). Would require a bot to replace the instances already deployed, which are all over the place. —
835:
For continuity and technical simplicity, I think the visible link text should be standardized. Personally I prefer
606:
505:
377:
673:
225:
161:
691:
There was a clear consensus to implement support for an optional link to an associated talk page section, which
256:"who claims? Please add the name, address, shoe number and hat number of the claimant, and also add a citation!"
737:
904:
39:
787:
552:
922:
As for the technical stuff: The way I wrote the test implementation, to call the functionality, we can use
911:
requires a crowd. If the sky were falling I might leap into the fray, but all the while I'm listening to
1142:
Then I realized that this is actually an unorthodox use case of "by whom", worthy of explicit mention.
577:
461:
1044:
1010:
939:
844:
761:
669:
665:
222:
158:
668:, which is not protected. You don't need to ask other editors to edit the documentation for you. --
1214:
908:
653:
440:
248:
doesn't explain what I'm after: I wish that this sentence is rewritten to a sourced citation. If a
156:
A straight replace seems ok to me. Some of the redirects were formerly redirects to "who" anyway.
962:
894:
818:
804:
783:
696:
544:
315:
to not redirect here. On the other hand the doc is unified between the two templates. ... said:
991:
415:
309:
882:
191:
1182:
700:
480:
320:
290:
269:
142:
878:
760:
I think it could be valuable to have this option, and would appreciate your consideration.
347:
344:
202:
642:
1210:
1168:
649:
436:
539:
1227:
958:
890:
814:
800:
457:
181:
1118:
Had I been in a blind hurry, I might have wanted to handle the problem like this:
987:
916:
870:
730:
628:
411:
133:
119:
736:
to implement support for an optional link to an associated talk page section - in
285:
BTW: shoe number reveals whether they're dwarves, the rest is obvious. ... said:
1174:
1155:
1080:
477:
473:
316:
286:
265:
638:
1130:
Where this wants to go is something like this (but more gracefully worded):
912:
1218:
1193:
1158:
1056:
1022:
995:
966:
951:
898:
856:
822:
808:
791:
773:
677:
657:
584:
560:
483:
465:
444:
419:
356:
330:
300:
279:
205:
195:
150:
1154:
immensely on prominent "see also"s link-farmed at the usual suspects.) —
129:
with a value of yes (use "by whom" form) or anything else/blank (go with
1188:
240:
When I write "{{says who}}" in the offending subjective text, I wish a
782:. Sounds fair, even though I don't see it used at all. Best regards,
532:| link = Knowledge (XXG):Avoid_weasel_words#Unsupported_attributions
633:
241:
903:
Hi. Although we can be bold, we can also be humble :-) There's
664:
In any case the template documentation is in a separate page,
594:
493:
365:
15:
1171:, It looks like there is no parameter checking here, like in
252:
is appended before the rest, I signal that I wish to know
692:
178:
175:
757:) would render if this feature were adopted as is.
407:
403:
399:
75:Some discussion of this template may take place at
689:
32:does not require a rating on Knowledge (XXG)'s
339:Editprotected request involving this template
8:
1209:. Please ping me if I messed anything up. –
889:because it tells you exacly what to put in.
528:| link = Knowledge (XXG):Avoid weasel words
86:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Inline Templates
47:
244:in the template such as , not a simple .
1115:passes such a golden opportunity up).
1079:This was recently found in the lead at
684:RfC: Optional link to talk page section
49:
1005:Any concerns about the rendering; the
931:
927:
923:
886:
863:
754:
750:
723:
126:
410:; i.e. there is an extraneous space.
89:Template:WikiProject Inline Templates
66:This template is within the scope of
21:
19:
7:
1037:
710:The following discussion is closed.
115:This should probably be merged into
746:{{By whom|date=Today|talk=Foo bar}}
201:Reverted by me, and Rich informed.
38:It is of interest to the following
1234:WikiProject Inline Templates pages
1075:Possibly useful off-label use case
881:? I think you could have followed
14:
1064:The discussion above is closed.
490:Edit request on 19 September 2013
1200:
1038:
1028:
632:
598:
566:
497:
426:
369:
362:Edit request on 12 February 2012
213:
165:, 20:38 27 September 2008 (UTC).
20:
585:11:46, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
561:03:09, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
536:
484:15:39, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
466:00:13, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
1:
1159:19:37, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
678:07:44, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
658:01:38, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
643:23:26, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
445:19:21, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
420:16:32, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
357:20:10, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
151:09:56, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
986:; sounds like a great idea.
590:
331:17:07, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
301:13:29, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
280:13:26, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
229:, 17:47 31 March 2009 (UTC).
69:WikiProject Inline Templates
1106:targeted to specific users
621:to reactivate your request.
609:has been answered. Set the
520:to reactivate your request.
508:has been answered. Set the
392:to reactivate your request.
380:has been answered. Set the
1250:
1057:23:15, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
1023:05:32, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
996:04:02, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
967:18:39, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
952:16:38, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
919:I just can't be feisty ;-)
899:16:06, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
857:11:55, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
823:20:39, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
809:17:24, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
792:16:10, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
774:02:19, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
703:) 21:46, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
211:
206:17:40, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
196:08:14, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
1219:04:22, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
1194:03:52, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
92:Inline Templates articles
59:
46:
1066:Please do not modify it.
713:Please do not modify it.
402:parameter's text begins
1135:online video calling).
534:to avoid the redirect.
177:for example. Caused by
77:the project's talk page
1179:. I just ran across a
1137:
1125:
1112:
1093:
705:
406:, but it should begin
1132:
1120:
1097:
1085:
125:, with an added flag
909:the wisdom of crowds
666:Template:By whom/doc
839:in this context to
738:the sandbox version
591:Add 'Visual effect'
170:Template is broken.
79:, rather than here.
1164:Parameter checking
1146:by whose authority
1087:Many applications
722:I've utilized the
353:(background check)
34:content assessment
625:
624:
524:
523:
396:
395:
108:
107:
104:
103:
100:
99:
1241:
1208:
1204:
1203:
1186:
1178:
1043:
1042:
1041:
1032:
1031:
933:
929:
925:
888:
875:
869:
865:
756:
752:
748:
747:
735:
729:
725:
715:
641:
636:
616:
612:
602:
601:
595:
580:
579:Mr. Stradivarius
570:
569:
558:
557:
555:
547:
542:
533:
529:
515:
511:
501:
500:
494:
434:
430:
429:
409:
405:
401:
387:
383:
373:
372:
366:
326:
314:
308:
296:
275:
236:Grammatical lack
217:
216:
145:
138:
132:
128:
124:
118:
94:
93:
90:
87:
84:
83:Inline Templates
61:
60:
54:Inline Templates
48:
25:
24:
23:
16:
1249:
1248:
1244:
1243:
1242:
1240:
1239:
1238:
1224:
1223:
1201:
1199:
1180:
1172:
1166:
1149:by whose agency
1077:
1072:
1039:
1029:
873:
867:
745:
744:
733:
727:
711:
706:
686:
670:John of Reading
637:
614:
610:
599:
593:
578:
567:
553:
545:
540:
538:
531:
527:
513:
509:
498:
492:
453:
427:
425:
385:
381:
370:
364:
355:
345:Template talk:!
341:
322:
312:
306:
292:
271:
238:
220:
219:
214:
189:
172:
141:
136:
130:
122:
116:
113:
91:
88:
85:
82:
81:
12:
11:
5:
1247:
1245:
1237:
1236:
1226:
1225:
1222:
1221:
1165:
1162:
1151:
1150:
1147:
1076:
1073:
1071:
1070:
1060:
1026:
1025:
999:
998:
980:
979:
978:
977:
976:
975:
974:
973:
972:
971:
970:
969:
936:
920:
828:
827:
826:
825:
794:
720:
719:
718:
688:
687:
685:
682:
681:
680:
661:
660:
623:
622:
603:
592:
589:
588:
587:
522:
521:
502:
491:
488:
487:
486:
452:
449:
448:
447:
394:
393:
374:
363:
360:
351:
340:
337:
336:
335:
334:
333:
258:
257:
237:
234:
233:
232:
231:
230:
212:
185:
171:
168:
167:
166:
112:
111:Merge proposal
109:
106:
105:
102:
101:
98:
97:
95:
73:
64:
57:
56:
51:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1246:
1235:
1232:
1231:
1229:
1220:
1216:
1212:
1207:
1198:
1197:
1196:
1195:
1192:
1191:
1184:
1176:
1170:
1163:
1161:
1160:
1157:
1148:
1145:
1144:
1143:
1140:
1136:
1131:
1128:
1124:
1119:
1116:
1111:
1109:
1105:
1102:applications
1101:
1096:
1092:
1090:
1084:
1082:
1074:
1069:
1067:
1062:
1061:
1059:
1058:
1055:
1054:
1053:
1049:
1035:
1024:
1021:
1020:
1019:
1015:
1008:
1004:
1001:
1000:
997:
993:
989:
985:
982:
981:
968:
964:
960:
955:
954:
953:
950:
949:
948:
944:
937:
921:
918:
914:
910:
906:
902:
901:
900:
896:
892:
884:
880:
872:
866:parameter in
860:
859:
858:
855:
854:
853:
849:
842:
838:
834:
833:
832:
831:
830:
829:
824:
820:
816:
812:
811:
810:
806:
802:
798:
795:
793:
789:
785:
784:Codename Lisa
781:
778:
777:
776:
775:
772:
771:
770:
766:
758:
741:
739:
732:
726:parameter in
717:
714:
708:
707:
704:
702:
698:
694:
693:has been done
683:
679:
675:
671:
667:
663:
662:
659:
655:
651:
647:
646:
645:
644:
640:
635:
630:
620:
617:parameter to
608:
604:
597:
596:
586:
583:
582:
581:
573:
565:
564:
563:
562:
559:
556:
551:
548:
543:
519:
516:parameter to
507:
503:
496:
495:
489:
485:
482:
479:
475:
470:
469:
468:
467:
463:
459:
450:
446:
442:
438:
433:
424:
423:
422:
421:
417:
413:
404:T he material
391:
388:parameter to
379:
375:
368:
367:
361:
359:
358:
354:
349:
346:
338:
332:
328:
327:
325:
318:
311:
304:
303:
302:
298:
297:
295:
288:
284:
283:
282:
281:
277:
276:
274:
267:
263:
255:
254:
253:
251:
247:
243:
235:
228:
227:
224:
209:
208:
207:
204:
200:
199:
198:
197:
193:
188:
183:
179:
176:
169:
164:
163:
160:
155:
154:
153:
152:
149:
146:
144:
135:
121:
110:
96:
80:
78:
71:
70:
65:
63:
62:
58:
55:
52:
50:
45:
41:
35:
31:
27:
18:
17:
1205:
1189:
1167:
1152:
1141:
1138:
1133:
1129:
1126:
1121:
1117:
1113:
1107:
1103:
1099:
1098:
1094:
1088:
1086:
1078:
1065:
1063:
1051:
1047:
1045:
1033:
1027:
1017:
1013:
1011:
1006:
1002:
983:
946:
942:
940:
917:Mr. Songbird
851:
847:
845:
840:
836:
796:
779:
768:
764:
762:
759:
742:
721:
712:
709:
690:
629:who template
626:
618:
607:edit request
576:
575:
571:
549:
535:
525:
517:
506:edit request
454:
431:
408:The material
397:
389:
378:edit request
342:
323:
321:
293:
291:
272:
270:
261:
259:
249:
245:
239:
221:
173:
157:
147:
140:
114:
74:
67:
40:WikiProjects
29:
1081:Google Play
905:no deadline
864:|post-text=
743:The use of
724:|post-text=
474:Wh-movement
246:"By whome?"
143:SMcCandlish
1003:Questions:
611:|answered=
510:|answered=
382:|answered=
348:cymru.lass
305:I altered
226:Farmbrough
203:Tonywalton
192:WP Physics
162:Farmbrough
1211:Jonesey95
1169:Jonesey95
1007:"Discuss"
932:|discuss=
928:|section=
913:The Kinks
887:|section=
837:"Discuss"
755:|discuss=
751:|section=
650:Debresser
437:WOSlinker
250:"claimed"
1228:Category
1108:based on
959:Hungryce
957:reason.
891:Hungryce
815:Hungryce
801:Hungryce
627:Per the
458:Sansveni
310:says who
218:Resolved
187:κοντριβς
182:Headbomb
30:template
1183:by whom
988:APerson
984:Support
883:WP:BOLD
797:Support
780:Support
541:Cheers,
526:Please
451:By who?
412:Gorobay
262:"claim"
210:Thanks
148:‹(-¿-)›
1156:MaxEnt
1104:can be
1089:can be
924:|talk=
879:WP:RFC
841:"Talk"
697:Cunard
478:Anomie
317:Rursus
287:Rursus
266:Rursus
36:scale.
992:talk!
749:( or
639:Husky
615:|ans=
605:This
514:|ans=
504:This
400:title
386:|ans=
376:This
324:bork³
294:bork³
273:bork³
28:This
1215:talk
1206:Done
1100:Many
1052:andt
1034:Done
1018:andt
963:talk
947:andt
907:and
895:talk
852:andt
819:talk
805:talk
788:talk
769:andt
701:talk
674:talk
654:talk
572:Done
462:talk
441:talk
432:Done
416:talk
398:The
242:verb
223:Rich
174:See
159:Rich
1048:red
1014:red
943:red
930:or
871:Fix
848:red
765:red
753:or
731:Fix
613:or
537:--
530:to
512:or
435:--
384:or
260:If
134:who
120:who
1230::
1217:)
1190:MB
1185:}}
1181:{{
1177:}}
1175:cn
1173:{{
1083::
994:)
965:)
926:,
915:'
897:)
874:}}
868:{{
843:.
821:)
807:)
790:)
740:.
734:}}
728:{{
695:.
676:)
656:)
619:no
574:—
554:ey
546:Ri
518:no
476:.
464:)
443:)
418:)
390:no
329:)
313:}}
307:{{
299:)
278:)
194:}
190:–
180:.
137:}}
131:{{
123:}}
117:{{
1213:(
1050:g
1046:f
1016:g
1012:f
990:(
961:(
945:g
941:f
893:(
850:g
846:f
817:(
803:(
786:(
767:g
763:f
699:(
672:(
652:(
550:l
481:⚔
460:(
439:(
414:(
350:⁄
319:(
289:(
268:(
184:{
127:|
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.